So when I was on the Settings app. I couldn’t see it, but I updated it and I don’t it why don’t is this a glitch please fix it your friend Isaiah.
Apple Intelligence
RSS for tagApple Intelligence is the personal intelligence system that puts powerful generative models right at the core of your iPhone, iPad, and Mac and powers incredible new features to help users communicate, work, and express themselves.
Selecting any option will automatically load the page
Post
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
I am working on adding indexing to my App Entities via IndexedEntity. I already, separately index my content via Spotlight.
Watching 'What's New in App Intents', this is covered well but I have a question.
Do I need to implement both CSSearchableItem's associateAppEntity AND also a custom implementation of attributeSet in my IndexedEntity conformance? It seems duplicative but I can't tell from the video if you're supposed to do both or just one or the other.
I tried this:
struct CarShortcutsProvider: AppShortcutsProvider {
@AppShortcutsBuilder
static var appShortcuts: [AppShortcut] {
AppShortcut(
intent: LockCarIntent(),
phrases: ["Lock my car with \(.applicationName)", "Lock my \(\.$car) with \(.applicationName)"],
shortTitle: LocalizedStringResource("Lock Car"),
systemImageName: "lock.fill"
)
AppShortcut(
intent: UnlockCarIntent(),
phrases: ["Unlock my car with \(.applicationName)", "Unlock my \(\.$car) with \(.applicationName)"],
shortTitle: LocalizedStringResource("Unlock Car"),
systemImageName: "lock.open.fill"
)
}
}
but Siri only understands "unlock my car ", not with the placeholder. Siri asks me then for the car, and it understands it, but not in one sentence. Is there something wrong with my code?
Also I tried it without applicationName first, and then it didn't work at all with Siri. Is this a general limitation of app intents? I thought the goal was to reduce friction. If the user has to mention the app name all the time, it adds friction.
Topic:
Machine Learning & AI
SubTopic:
Apple Intelligence