If I may respond to your post below....
1) If you resubmit then you cancel the appeal process. So you have to make a decision, await a response to the appeal or resubmit. It's a tough decision. Sometimes the appeal can get lost in the system and resubmission can take many days and fail to address an incorrectly perceived feature of the app.
2) Yes, confirming KMT below, it may be just a simple mistake - that App Review thought you were enabling streaming a TV Channel. App Review may simply realize this and accept your appeal as it is.
3) But......Your appeal (as you quoted below) did not address, perhaps, the key issue - who owns the copyright on the material your app does, or can, display. Clearly App Review is wrong about the streaming. They seem to misunderstand what your app does. Your appeal places them on the defensive, perhaps not from where you want them to respond. The rejection itself involved copyrights as a result of some feature App Review sees in your app. Asking App Review to specify that feature will not address the core concern - copyright. I'd redo the appeal stating simply...."Thanks for reviewing the app. It does not stream any material. I created and therefore own the copyright in the material the app presents - and I am submitting this response as docuentary evidence of such ownership. I am answering this under the provisions of section 3.2(f)."
4) If however, you do not own the copyright in the material the app displays, or that the user is able to access material through the app that would violate a copyright (e.g. downloading music files from other users), then App Review's concern needs to be addressed. Albeit, no media streaming, but there is still a copyright infringement issue. App Review may have simply misstated the source of their concern.
