Why Python native on M1 Max is greatly slower than Python on old Intel i5?

Hi graphitum, i have obtained the same results!! On my MacBook m1 pro results has been : 4.34 secs while on my iMac 27 with i7-10700K the program returned an incredible 0.75532 secs !!

I'm very confused about this !!! We have to see deep inside the question....

As I know, Intel has super powerful math library.. you can see more details at below link.: https://www.pugetsystems.com/labs/hpc/AMD-Ryzen-3900X-vs-Intel-Xeon-2175W-Python-numpy---MKL-vs-OpenBLAS-1560/

I have worked out a workaround solution - How to install numpy on M1 Max, with the most accelerated performance (Apple's vecLib)? Here's the answer as of Dec 6 2021.

Steps

I. Install miniforge

So that your Python is run natively on arm64, not translated via Rosseta.

1. Download Miniforge3-MacOSX-arm64.sh, then
2. Run the script, then open another shell

$ bash Miniforge3-MacOSX-arm64.sh

1. Create an environment (here I use name np_veclib)

$ conda create -n np_veclib python=3.9
$ conda activate np_veclib

II. Install Numpy with BLAS interface specified as vecLib

1. To compile numpy, first need to install cython and pybind11:

$ conda install cython pybind11

1. Compile numpy by (Thanks @Marijn's answer) - don't use conda install!

$ pip install --no-binary :all: --no-use-pep517 numpy

1. An alternative of 2. is to build from source

$ git clone https://github.com/numpy/numpy
$ cd numpy
$ cp site.cfg.example site.cfg
$ nano site.cfg

Edit the copied site.cfg: add the following lines:

[accelerate]
libraries = Accelerate, vecLib

Then build and install:

$ NPY_LAPACK_ORDER=accelerate python setup.py build
$ python setup.py install

1. After either 2 or 3, now test whether numpy is using vecLib:

>>> import numpy
>>> numpy.show_config()

Then, info like /System/Library/Frameworks/vecLib.framework/Headers should be printed.

III. For further installing other packages using conda

Make conda recognize packages installed by pip

conda config --set pip_interop_enabled true

This must be done, otherwise if e.g. conda install pandas, then numpy will be in The following packages will be installed list and installed again. But the new installed one is from conda-forge channel and is slow.

Comparisons to other installations:

1. Competitors:

Except for the above optimal one, I also tried several other installations

• A. np_default: conda create -n np_default python=3.9 numpy
• B. np_openblas: conda create -n np_openblas python=3.9 numpy blas=*=*openblas*
• C. np_netlib: conda create -n np_netlib python=3.9 numpy blas=*=*netlib*

The above ABC options are directly installed from conda-forge channel. numpy.show_config() will show identical results. To see the difference, examine by conda list - e.g. openblas packages are installed in B. Note that mkl or blis is not supported on arm64.

• D. np_openblas_source: First install openblas by brew install openblas. Then add [openblas] path /opt/homebrew/opt/openblas to site.cfg and build Numpy from source.
• M1 and i9–9880H in this post.
• My old i5-6360U 2cores on MacBook Pro 2016 13in.

2. Benchmarks:

Here I use two benchmarks:

1. mysvd.py: My SVD decomposition

import time
import numpy as np
np.random.seed(42)
a = np.random.uniform(size=(300, 300))
runtimes = 10

timecosts = []
for _ in range(runtimes):
    s_time = time.time()
    for i in range(100):
        a += 1
        np.linalg.svd(a)
    timecosts.append(time.time() - s_time)

print(f'mean of {runtimes} runs: {np.mean(timecosts):.5f}s')

1. dario.py: A benchmark script by Dario Radečić at the post above.

3. Results:

+-------+-----------+------------+-------------+-----------+--------------------+----+----------+----------+
|  sec  | np_veclib | np_default | np_openblas | np_netlib | np_openblas_source | M1 | i9–9880H | i5-6360U |
+-------+-----------+------------+-------------+-----------+--------------------+----+----------+----------+
| mysvd |  1.02300  |   4.29386  |   4.13854   |  4.75812  |      12.57879      |  / |     /    |  2.39917 |
+-------+-----------+------------+-------------+-----------+--------------------+----+----------+----------+
| dario |     21    |     41     |      39     |    323    |         40         | 33 |    23    |    78    |
+-------+-----------+------------+-------------+-----------+--------------------+----+----------+----------+

I tested this on my M1 MacBook Pro 13" MacOS Big Sur, using python 3.8, numpy 1.19 (from Apple's TF 2.6.0 dependencies) and got 2.35s average.

How do I best install conda? I wiped my hard drive on my M1. I did the command $bash Miniforge3-MacOSX-arm64.sh and next I am tried $ conda create -n pym12022feb python=3.9 and Error is: $ bash: conda: command not found. Many Thanks.

Tried with my new M1 Pro here, 10 CPU, 16 GPU. Python 3.10.2 installed via python website. numpy installed via pip3

Tried with M2 MacBook Air 24GB ram. under 1 sec :)

Instead of all the above, I was able to get ~1 second results on the mysvd.py test by just running:

conda install numpy "libblas=*=*accelerate"

In my new MAC M1.

1)I installed the Minoforge3 (bash Miniforge3-MacOSX-arm64.sh) 2 Initialized a conda base environment (conda init) 3) Installed numpy properly: conda install numpy "libblas=*=*accelerate"

And then the suggested benchmark runs in 1.07172 secs