Hi everyone
Im currently developing an object detection model that shall identify up to seven classes in an image. While im usually doing development with basic python and the ultralytics library, i thought i would like to give CreateML a shot. The experience is actually very nice, except for the fact that the model seem not to be using any ANE or GPU (MPS) for accelerated training.
On https://developer.apple.com/machine-learning/create-ml/ it states: "On-device training Train models blazingly fast right on your Mac while taking advantage of CPU and GPU."
Am I doing something wrong?
Im running the training on
Apple M1 Pro 16GB
MacOS 26.1 (Tahoe)
Xcode 26.1 (Build version 17B55)
It would be super nice to get some feedback or instructions.
Thank you in advance!
ML Compute
RSS for tagAccelerate training and validation of neural networks using the CPU and GPUs.
Posts under ML Compute tag
29 Posts
Selecting any option will automatically load the page
Post
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
We’ve encountered what appears to be a CoreML regression between macOS 26.0.1 and macOS 26.1 Beta.
In macOS 26.0.1, CoreML models run and produce correct results. However, in macOS 26.1 Beta, the same models produce scrambled or corrupted outputs, suggesting that tensor memory is being read or written incorrectly. The behavior is consistent with a low-level stride or pointer arithmetic issue — for example, using 16-bit strides on 32-bit data or other mismatches in tensor layout handling.
Reproduction
Install ON1 Photo RAW 2026 or ON1 Resize 2026 on macOS 26.0.1.
Use the newest Highest Quality resize model, which is Stable Diffusion–based and runs through CoreML.
Observe correct, high-quality results.
Upgrade to macOS 26.1 Beta and run the same operation again.
The output becomes visually scrambled or corrupted.
We are also seeing similar issues with another Stable Diffusion UNet model that previously worked correctly on macOS 26.0.1. This suggests the regression may affect multiple diffusion-style architectures, likely due to a change in CoreML’s tensor stride, layout computation, or memory alignment between these versions.
Notes
The affected models are exported using standard CoreML conversion pipelines.
No custom operators or third-party CoreML runtime layers are used.
The issue reproduces consistently across multiple machines.
It would be helpful to know if there were changes to CoreML’s tensor layout, precision handling, or MLCompute backend between macOS 26.0.1 and 26.1 Beta, or if this is a known regression in the current beta.
Using Tensorflow for Silicon gives inaccurate results when compared to Google Colab GPU (9-15% differences). Here are my install versions for 4 anaconda env's. I understand the Floating point precision can be an issue, batch size, activation functions but how do you rectify this issue for the past 3 years?
1.) Version TF: 2.12.0, Python 3.10.13, tensorflow-deps: 2.9.0, tensorflow-metal: 1.2.0, h5py: 3.6.0, keras: 2.12.0
2.) Version TF: 2.19.0, Python 3.11.0, tensorflow-metal: 1.2.0, h5py: 3.13.0, keras: 3.9.2, jax: 0.6.0, jax-metal: 0.1.1,jaxlib: 0.6.0, ml_dtypes: 0.5.1
3.) python: 3.10.13,tensorflow: 2.19.0,tensorflow-metal: 1.2.0, h5py: 3.13.0, keras: 3.9.2, ml_dtypes: 0.5.1
4.) Version TF: 2.16.2, tensorflow-deps:2.9.0,Python: 3.10.16, tensorflow-macos 2.16.2, tensorflow-metal: 1.2.0, h5py:3.13.0, keras: 3.9.2, ml_dtypes: 0.3.2
Install of Each ENV with common example:
Create ENV: conda create --name TF_Env_V2 --no-default-packages
start env: source TF_Env_Name
ENV_1.) conda install -c apple tensorflow-deps , conda install tensorflow,pip install tensorflow-metal,conda install ipykernel
ENV_2.) conda install pip python==3.11, pip install tensorflow,pip install tensorflow-metal,conda install ipykernel
ENV_3) conda install pip python 3.10.13,pip install tensorflow, pip install tensorflow-metal,conda install ipykernel
ENV_4) conda install -c apple tensorflow-deps, pip install tensorflow-macos, pip install tensor-metal, conda install ipykernel
Example used on all 4 env:
import tensorflow as tf
cifar = tf.keras.datasets.cifar100
(x_train, y_train), (x_test, y_test) = cifar.load_data()
model = tf.keras.applications.ResNet50(
include_top=True,
weights=None,
input_shape=(32, 32, 3),
classes=100,)
loss_fn = tf.keras.losses.SparseCategoricalCrossentropy(from_logits=False)
model.compile(optimizer="adam", loss=loss_fn, metrics=["accuracy"])
model.fit(x_train, y_train, epochs=5, batch_size=64)
Context
I’m deploying large language models on iPhone using llama.cpp. A new iPhone Air (12 GB RAM) reports a Metal MTLDevice.recommendedMaxWorkingSetSize of 8,192 MB, and my attempt to load Llama-2-13B Q4_K (~7.32 GB weights) fails during model initialization.
Environment
Device: iPhone Air (12 GB RAM)
iOS: 26
Xcode: 26.0.1
Build: Metal backend enabled llama.cpp
App runs on device (not Simulator)
What I’m seeing
MTLCreateSystemDefaultDevice().recommendedMaxWorkingSetSize == 8192 MiB
Loading Llama-2-13B Q4_K (7.32 GB) fails to complete. Logs indicate memory pressure / allocation issues consistent with the 8 GB working-set guidance.
Smaller models (e.g., 7B/8B with similar quantization) load and run (8B Q4_K provide around 9 tokens/second decoding speed).
Questions
Is 8,192 MB an expected recommendedMaxWorkingSetSize on a 12 GB iPhone?
What values should I expect on other 2025 devices including iPhone 17 (8 GB RAM) and iPhone 17 Pro (12 GB RAM)
Is it strictly enforced by Metal allocations (heaps/buffers), or advisory for best performance/eviction behavior?
Can a process practically exceed this for long-lived buffers without immediate Jetsam risk?
Any guidance for LLM scenarios near the limit?
Hello, is it allowed to use Foundation Model Framework in submission app for WWDC26? The thing is that Apple Intelligence needs to be enabled in the settings. So, does that mean the jury won't be able to fully utilize the app's AI functionality?
Does anyone know if ExecuTorch is officially supported or has been successfully used on visionOS? If so, are there any specific build instructions, example projects, or potential issues (like sandboxing or memory limitations) to be aware of when integrating it into an Xcode project for the Vision Pro?
While ExecuTorch has support for iOS, I can't find any official documentation or community examples specifically mentioning visionOS.
Thanks.
WWDC25: Combine Metal 4 machine learning and graphics
Demonstrated a way to combine neural network in the graphics pipeline directly through the shaders, using an example of Texture Compression. However there is no mention of using which ML technique texture is compressed.
Can anyone point me to some well known model/s for this particular use case shown in WWDC25.
From tensorflow-metal example:
Created TensorFlow device (/job:localhost/replica:0/task:0/device:GPU:0 with 0 MB memory) -> physical PluggableDevice (device: 0, name: METAL, pci bus id: )
I know that Apple silicon uses UMA, and that memory copies are typical of CUDA, but wouldn't the GPU memory still be faster overall?
I have an iMac Pro with a Radeon Pro Vega 64 16 GB GPU and an Intel iMac with a Radeon Pro 5700 8 GB GPU.
But using tensorflow-metal is still WAY faster than using the CPUs. Thanks for that. I am surprised the 5700 is twice as fast as the Vega though.
I'm developing a tennis ball tracking feature using Vision Framework in Swift, specifically utilizing VNDetectedObjectObservation and VNTrackObjectRequest.
Occasionally (but not always), I receive the following runtime error:
Failed to perform SequenceRequest: Error Domain=com.apple.Vision Code=9 "Internal error: unexpected tracked object bounding box size" UserInfo={NSLocalizedDescription=Internal error: unexpected tracked object bounding box size}
From my investigation, I suspect the issue arises when the bounding box from the initial observation (VNDetectedObjectObservation) is too small. However, Apple's documentation doesn't clearly define the minimum bounding box size that's considered valid by VNTrackObjectRequest.
Could someone clarify:
What is the minimum acceptable bounding box width and height (normalized) that Vision Framework's VNTrackObjectRequest expects?
Is there any recommended practice or official guidance for bounding box size validation before creating a tracking request?
This information would be extremely helpful to reliably avoid this internal error.
Thank you!
Topic:
Media Technologies
SubTopic:
Photos & Camera
Tags:
ML Compute
Machine Learning
Camera
AVFoundation
I followed below url for converting Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct model but always fails even i have 64GB of free space after downloading model from huggingface.
https://machinelearning.apple.com/research/core-ml-on-device-llama
Also tried with other models Llama-3.1-1B-Instruct & Llama-3.1-3B-Instruct models those are converted but while doing performance test in xcode fails for all compunits.
Is there any source code to run llama models in ios app.
I got 3203.23 GFLOPS (FP16) on the M3 Macbook Pro and only 2833.24 GFLOPS (FP16) on the M4 Macbook Air for 4096x4096 matrix multiplications for a PyTorch MPS FP16 Benchmark. Wasn't the performance supposed to be twice as high on the M4 compared to the M3 even with the termal throtling on the Macbook Air? What went wrong?
In my quantization code, the line:
compressed_model_a8 = cto.coreml.experimental.linear_quantize_activations(
model, activation_config, [{'img':np.random.randn(1,13,1024,1024)}]
)
has taken 90 minutes to run so far and is still not completed. From debugging, I can see that the line it's stuck on is line 261 in _model_debugger.py:
model = ct.models.MLModel(
cloned_spec,
weights_dir=self.weights_dir,
compute_units=compute_units,
skip_model_load=False, # Don't skip model load as we need model prediction to get activations range.
)
Is this expected behaviour? Would it be quicker to run on another computer with more RAM?
Hello,
I posted an issue on the coremltools GitHub about my Core ML models not performing as well on iOS 17 vs iOS 16 but I'm posting it here just in case.
TL;DR
The same model on the same device/chip performs far slower (doesn't use the Neural Engine) on iOS 17 compared to iOS 16.
Longer description
The following screenshots show the performance of the same model (a PyTorch computer vision model) on an iPhone SE 3rd gen and iPhone 13 Pro (both use the A15 Bionic).
iOS 16 - iPhone SE 3rd Gen (A15 Bioinc)
iOS 16 uses the ANE and results in fast prediction, load and compilation times.
iOS 17 - iPhone 13 Pro (A15 Bionic)
iOS 17 doesn't seem to use the ANE, thus the prediction, load and compilation times are all slower.
Code To Reproduce
The following is my code I'm using to export my PyTorch vision model (using coremltools).
I've used the same code for the past few months with sensational results on iOS 16.
# Convert to Core ML using the Unified Conversion API
coreml_model = ct.convert(
model=traced_model,
inputs=[image_input],
outputs=[ct.TensorType(name="output")],
classifier_config=ct.ClassifierConfig(class_names),
convert_to="neuralnetwork",
# compute_precision=ct.precision.FLOAT16,
compute_units=ct.ComputeUnit.ALL
)
System environment:
Xcode version: 15.0
coremltools version: 7.0.0
OS (e.g. MacOS version or Linux type): Linux Ubuntu 20.04 (for exporting), macOS 13.6 (for testing on Xcode)
Any other relevant version information (e.g. PyTorch or TensorFlow version): PyTorch 2.0
Additional context
This happens across "neuralnetwork" and "mlprogram" type models, neither use the ANE on iOS 17 but both use the ANE on iOS 16
If anyone has a similar experience, I'd love to hear more.
Otherwise, if I'm doing something wrong for the exporting of models for iOS 17+, please let me know.
Thank you!
使用MPS来加速机器学习功能,有时是否与torch会有适配性问题?
Hey everyone, i just updated my IPhone to ios 18.4 a just after i updated my mobile internet stopped working. With no internet i cant do anything, and i dont know how to fix it, i hope someone can help me
Based on the documentation, it appears that MLTensor can be used to perform tensor operations using the ANE (Apple Neural Engine) by wrapping the tensor operations with withMLTensorComputePolicy with a MLComputePolicy initialized with MLComputeUnits.cpuAndNeuralEngine (it can also be initialized with MLComputeUnits.all to let the OS spread the load between the Neural Engine, GPU and CPU).
However, when using the Instruments app, it appears that the tensor operations never get executed on the Neural Engine.
It would be helpful if someone can guide me on the correct way to ensure that the Nerual Engine is used to perform the tensor operations (not as part of a CoreML model file).
based on this example, I've created a simple code to try it:
import Foundation
import CoreML
print("Starting...")
let semaphore = DispatchSemaphore(value: 0)
Task {
await withMLTensorComputePolicy(.init(MLComputeUnits.cpuAndNeuralEngine)) {
let v1 = MLTensor([1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0])
let v2 = MLTensor([5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0])
let v3 = v1.matmul(v2)
await v3.shapedArray(of: Float.self) // is 70.0
let m1 = MLTensor(shape: [2, 3], scalars: [
1, 2, 3,
4, 5, 6
], scalarType: Float.self)
let m2 = MLTensor(shape: [3, 2], scalars: [
7, 8,
9, 10,
11, 12
], scalarType: Float.self)
let m3 = m1.matmul(m2)
let result = await m3.shapedArray(of: Float.self) // is [[58, 64], [139, 154]]
// Supports broadcasting
let m4 = MLTensor(randomNormal: [3, 1, 1, 4], scalarType: Float.self)
let m5 = MLTensor(randomNormal: [4, 2], scalarType: Float.self)
let m6 = m4.matmul(m5)
print("Done")
return result;
}
semaphore.signal()
}
semaphore.wait()
Here's what I get on the Instruments app:
Notice how the Neural Engine line shows no usage.
Ive run this test on an M1 Max MacBook Pro.
When working on the project "Analyzing a Selfie and Visualizing Its Content" from Apple's documentation, I downloaded the project and opened it in Xcode. However, I encountered the following error:
VTEST: error: perform(_:): inside 'for await result in resultStream' error: internalError("Error Domain=com.apple.Vision Code=9 \"Could not create inference context\" UserInfo={NSLocalizedDescription=Could not create inference context}")
VTEST: error: DetectFaceRectanglesRequest was cancelled.
VTEST: error: DetectFaceRectanglesRequest was cancelled.
Error Domain=com.apple.Vision Code=9 "Could not create inference context" UserInfo={NSLocalizedDescription=Could not create inference context}
How can I resolve this issue? Thanks in advance!
After updating to macOS15.2beta, the Yolo11 object detection model exported to coreml outputs incorrect and abnormal bounding boxes.
It also doesn't work in iOS apps built on a 15.2 mac.
The same model worked fine on macOS14.1.
When training a Yolo11 custom model in Python, exporting it to coreml, and testing it in the preview tab of mlpackage on macOS15.2 and Xcode16.0, the above result is obtained.
Issue type: Bug
TensorFlow metal version: 1.1.1
TensorFlow version: 2.18
OS platform and distribution: MacOS 15.2
Python version: 3.11.11
GPU model and memory: Apple M2 Max GPU 38-cores
Standalone code to reproduce the issue:
import tensorflow as tf
if __name__ == '__main__':
gpus = tf.config.experimental.list_physical_devices('GPU')
print(gpus)
Current behavior
Apple silicone GPU with tensorflow-metal==1.1.0 and python 3.11 works fine with tensorboard==2.17.0
This is normal output:
/Users/mspanchenko/anaconda3/envs/cryptoNN_ml_core/bin/python /Users/mspanchenko/VSCode/cryptoNN/ml/core_second_window/test_tensorflow_gpus.py
[PhysicalDevice(name='/physical_device:GPU:0', device_type='GPU')]
Process finished with exit code 0
But if I upgrade tensorflow to 2.18 I'll have error:
/Users/mspanchenko/anaconda3/envs/cryptoNN_ml_core/bin/python /Users/mspanchenko/VSCode/cryptoNN/ml/core_second_window/test_tensorflow_gpus.py
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/Users/mspanchenko/VSCode/cryptoNN/ml/core_second_window/test_tensorflow_gpus.py", line 1, in <module>
import tensorflow as tf
File "/Users/mspanchenko/anaconda3/envs/cryptoNN_ml_core/lib/python3.11/site-packages/tensorflow/__init__.py", line 437, in <module>
_ll.load_library(_plugin_dir)
File "/Users/mspanchenko/anaconda3/envs/cryptoNN_ml_core/lib/python3.11/site-packages/tensorflow/python/framework/load_library.py", line 151, in load_library
py_tf.TF_LoadLibrary(lib)
tensorflow.python.framework.errors_impl.NotFoundError: dlopen(/Users/mspanchenko/anaconda3/envs/cryptoNN_ml_core/lib/python3.11/site-packages/tensorflow-plugins/libmetal_plugin.dylib, 0x0006): Symbol not found: __ZN3tsl8internal10LogMessageC1EPKcii
Referenced from: <D2EF42E3-3A7F-39DD-9982-FB6BCDC2853C> /Users/mspanchenko/anaconda3/envs/cryptoNN_ml_core/lib/python3.11/site-packages/tensorflow-plugins/libmetal_plugin.dylib
Expected in: <2814A58E-D752-317B-8040-131217E2F9AA> /Users/mspanchenko/anaconda3/envs/cryptoNN_ml_core/lib/python3.11/site-packages/tensorflow/python/_pywrap_tensorflow_internal.so
Process finished with exit code 1
Hello,
I would like to inquire about the release date of Swift Assist’s beta version. Apple has stated that it will be released later this year, but they have not provided a specific date or time.
Could you please provide information on the beta version’s release date? Additionally, is there a trial version available? If so, when was it released?
Thank you for your assistance.