Hi everyone,
I am looking for some insight from anyone who has dealt with a long "In Review" session recently, especially for apps in complex categories like prediction markets or finance.
The Situation: Our app was previously rejected under Guideline 5.3.4 (Gambling/Prediction Markets). We submitted a formal appeal with a very detailed compliance brief and a comprehensive demo video to show our non-custodial architecture.
The build went "In Review" exactly 24 hours ago. This is a standard (non-expedited) submission, but since the status hasn't moved in a full day, I wanted to see if this is common for apps that are under "compliance audit."
App Details
- Name: Clover: Predict with Friends
- App ID: 6761430958
- Bundle ID: fun.clover.app
- Version: 1.2.0 (Build 19)
- Status: In Review (24+ hours)
What we have already tried
- Confirmed there are no unread messages in the Resolution Center.
- Verified that all testing credentials and demo videos are functional.
- Filed a formal App Status Inquiry via Developer Support.
Questions for the community
- For those in "gray area" categories (prediction, crypto, etc.), how long does your "In Review" phase typically last for a standard submission?
- Given the 5.3.4 context, does a 24-hour session usually mean it's being escalated to a more senior reviewer or a legal lead?
- Is it common for standard reviews to stay "In Review" across a weekend or multiple business days?
I would love to hear from anyone who has navigated a similar deep dive review.
Thank you for any advice or shared experiences!