Discuss how to manage tickets, boarding passes, payment cards and other passes in the Wallet app.

Wallet Documentation

Posts under Wallet subtopic

Post

Replies

Boosts

Views

Created

Apple wallet pass nfc enable
on a span of 4 months we sent 2 for nfc entitlement requests and refused , no reason nothing . i mean all we want is the ability to use nfc on passes nothing else , no idea why this is so complex . with google you don’t even need a developer account and it’s for free , here we pay and we can’t even get the full functionality the passes offer , we got the hardware and the solution but we find out we need an nfc entitlement to allow passes to have nfc ? i mean our use case is very simple instead of having barcode on the passes we want them to be via nfc and we already got the nfc hardware but we find out we need nfc entitlement which we tried requesting but getting refused with no reason at all. at least tell u what is the problem what how to fix it not outright refuse without any reason at all. if anyone got any solution please provide.
0
0
128
Feb ’25
Verify with wallet run in simulator
I am fallowing the steps mention here https://developer.apple.com/wallet/get-started-with-verify-with-wallet/ and https://developer.apple.com/documentation/passkit/requesting-identity-data-from-a-wallet-pass to run a POC in simulator but I am getting a crash DigitalPresentmentSession requestDocument fatal error from xpc: This app has crashed because it called an API it is not entitled to use. :0: Fatal error: This app has crashed because it called an API it is not entitled to use.
4
0
330
Jan ’25
Wallet Extension stopped working
Hello, I am facing a problem when trying to start the Wallet Extension Flow. It seems that even though the override func status(completion: @escaping (PKIssuerProvisioningExtensionStatus) -> Void) of the PKIssuerProvisioningExtensionHandler is called, the override func passEntries(completion: @escaping ([PKIssuerProvisioningExtensionPassEntry]) -> Void) is not called. Note that this issue is reproduced in a device with iOS 18.1 whereas it is working correctly in a device with iOS 17.4. Has something changed regarding the Wallet Extension in iOS 18.1 and above?
1
0
238
Jan ’25
pkpass not opening on iphone (ios17.7)
I am currently working on creating a digital wallet for Apple. While I am able to successfully generate the .pkpass file and verify its contents by changing the extension to .zip, I encounter an issue when attempting to open the .pkpass file on an iPhone—it displays the error "File format is not supported." I validated the .pkpass file using https://pkpassvalidator.azurewebsites.net/, and the validation results indicate that everything is correct. Additionally, I manually verified the contents by extracting the zip file, and all the information appears to be in order. I am unable to identify the root cause of this issue. Could you please provide guidance on what might be going wrong?
1
0
241
Jan ’25
PKPassLibrary.requestAutomaticPassPresentationSuppression Behavior
We are implementing a feature that uses PKPassLibrary.requestAutomaticPassPresentationSuppression to prevent the Wallet from appearing when unlocking a lock. We have already completed the approval process for the entitlement to enable Pass Presentation Suppression. In most cases, our code snippet works as expected, and the result is .success. However, we are also encountering other results, such as .denied, .alreadyPresenting, and .cancelled or .notSupported, which cause the Wallet to appear for users. Here's the code snippet we're using: PKPassLibrary.requestAutomaticPassPresentationSuppression { result in logger.log( .info, "PKPassLibrary suppression result: \(result.description)", LogContext.homeFeature ) } I would appreciate clarification on the following points: What's the meaning of each result type (.denied, .alreadyPresenting, .cancelled, .notSupported) beyond what is mentioned in the documentation? The documentation here does not provide additional details. What is the recommended handling for these specific result states? Should we be taking different actions or retries based on each case? Thank you very much for your help. Best, Ramiro.
4
2
323
Nov ’24