Post

Replies

Boosts

Views

Activity

Reply to Notarization of universal static library (fat file) doesn't work
@eskimo: Yes I'm building an SDK. I don't expect my clients to include the static lib but I want to offer it as an option. So I'm shipping both the dynamic and the static library. In the past I only shipped the dynamic library but we got requests from some Linux customers to include a static version too, so I added it on Linux and thought it wouldn't hurt when I add it on macOS too. Can you please tell me more about those workarounds :) Thanks
Topic: App & System Services SubTopic: General Tags:
Jan ’21
Reply to Notarization of universal static library (fat file) doesn't work
@Etresoft I didn't say that I'm notarizing a single static library or a Framework by itself ^^ I notarize my Framework as package, the package contains a binary and multiple libraries including the static library. Please note that I mentioned in my question that notarization does already work correctly for me when I build non-fat files. Only in case of fat files it fails. So I'm indeed able to notarize this archive.
Topic: App & System Services SubTopic: General Tags:
Jan ’21