“SwiftData inheritance relationship”

An app and its extensions can share a SwiftData store located in a shared App Group container. The following Apple sample demonstrates that: Adopting SwiftData for a Core Data app The discussion in this post may help as well, if you have any data update issue. CloudKit integration adds more complexity on this topic. You can start with checking if this post helps. SwiftData + CloudKit uses NSPersistentCloudKitContainer under the hood, and so the content applies. Best, —— Ziqiao Chen  Worldwide Developer Relations.

You might want to check if this post answers your question. SwiftData + CloudKit uses NSPersistentCloudKitContainer under the hood, and so the content applies. Best, —— Ziqiao Chen  Worldwide Developer Relations.

Did you wait some time to make sure the error didn't pop up? It might take a minute or two. Try inserting a record then re-running and waiting a few minutes. Yeah, I've tried waiting until seeing the new record being synchronized across my devices, and haven't seen the issue. NSKeyedUnarchiveFromData is the default transformer and comes to play when you use a Core Data / SwiftData transformable attribute without explicitly specifying a transformer. Unless you are using a transformable attribute, it shouldn't be engaged. My best guess is that your CloudKit schema / data contains something that needs a transformer (due to your historical changes?), and that triggers the error when NSPersistentCloudKitContainer tries to synchronize the data from the server to your device. If that is the case, consider cleaning up the schema and data on the CloudKit server. Assuming you are on the CloudKit development environment, you can remove the existing schema and data by resetting the environment, and then re-creat

Thanks a lot for your detailed explanation of the relevant concepts @DTS Engineer. It's very helpful and I really appreciate your time and support here. I am using Content Filter Extension to capture/log some basic details. As you've mentioned, it's the simplest one. I wanted to have a working network extension app for MacOS to begin with. However, my intention is to capture real network traffic with HTTP/HTTPS logs, actual urls, and actual endpoints along with DNS Record details by using all the relevant extensions together. Right now, My app is working with Content Filter extension. As you suggested, I am building with two Xcode targets, one with Main app and other with the System Extension(which contains multiple network extensions). To start with, I am only focusing on HTTP logs capture using NETransparentProxyProvider for now(Capturing/logging HTTPS requires more work dealing with TLS and Certificates, will look into this later). I am able to build, and run this binary with these added new files for AppP

Also started seeing this around 2025-09-05. Using the manualPrice id returned from a previous relationships/manualPrices result. Error: Request https://api.appstoreconnect.apple.com/v1/inAppPurchasePriceSchedules failed with status code 409. Related response error(s): The request failed with response code 409 ENTITY_ERROR.INCLUDED.INVALID_ID The provided entity id is invalid. The provided included entity id 'eyJzIjoiNjQ1MTIxNzg3OSIsInQiOiJVU0EiLCJwIjoiMTAwOTQiLCJzZCI6MC4wLCJlZCI6MC4wfQ' has invalid format).

(Re: previous answers - skip if you haven't followed the saga) Adding some context for the answer. I added AppKit specifically because it's not UIKit, as I didn't want an answer for iOS or ipadOS, but macOS. The only SwiftUI line is the onDrag, that I faithfully added to the line as the caller, but I didn't think I'd have a different DropHandler for macOS and ipadOS, the culprit seemingly being the onDrag SwiftUI part that tries to give me only the good thing on macOS, but somehow is unusable. As I repeated, I wanted to quickly iterate and used the hacks instead of trying to use the Async versions, where some versions aren't actually available. The final code will be in Async, thank you. My first SwiftUI app was with GCD because there wasn't an alternative back then. There's one now. But I'm also butting heads with SwiftData, where models cannot be Sendable, but Async are also required to be sendable, so I've had a lot of fun on this topic. With the nearly 200 trials I had to do in order to make it w

I switch to using Data with Transient computed property and it still is showing the same error logged to the console: import SwiftData @Model final class ProtocolMedication { var uuid: UUID = UUID() var createdAt: Date = Date() var frequency: SchedulingFrequency = SchedulingFrequency.atRegularIntervals var interval: SchedulingInterval = SchedulingInterval(days: 1) var startDate: Date = Date() var timesData: Data? var dayOfWeekSelection: DayOfWeekSelection = DayOfWeekSelection(days: [1]) var injectionRotationConfig: InjectionRotationConfig = InjectionRotationConfig() var medicationConcentration: MedicationConcentration = MedicationConcentration(value: nil, unit: nil) var medication: Medication? @Relationship(deleteRule: .cascade, inverse: ScheduledDose.protocolMed) var _scheduledDoses: [ScheduledDose]? @Relationship(deleteRule: .cascade, inverse: DoseLog.protocolMed) var _doseLogs: [DoseLog]? @Transient var times: [SchedulingTime] { get { guard let data = timesData else { return [] }

Do you have a feedback report yet? If not, I’d suggest that you file one and share your report ID here. For a workaround, you might consider making SchedulingTime a SwiftData model, if that is appropriate, and relating it to ProtocolMedication with a too-many relationship. You can also consider using Data directly for persistence, and providing a transient (@Transient) property for the access to the struct array (only) in memory. A transient property can't be used in a query though. Best, —— Ziqiao Chen  Worldwide Developer Relations.