General: Forums subtopic: App & System Services > Networking TN3151 Choosing the right networking API Networking Overview document — Despite the fact that this is in the archive, this is still really useful. TLS for App Developers forums post Choosing a Network Debugging Tool documentation WWDC 2019 Session 712 Advances in Networking, Part 1 — This explains the concept of constrained networking, which is Apple’s preferred solution to questions like How do I check whether I’m on Wi-Fi? TN3135 Low-level networking on watchOS TN3179 Understanding local network privacy Adapt to changing network conditions tech talk Understanding Also-Ran Connections forums post Extra-ordinary Networking forums post Foundation networking: Forums tags: Foundation, CFNetwork URL Loading System documentation — NSURLSession, or URLSession in Swift, is the recommended API for HTTP[S] on Apple platforms. Network framework: Forums tag: Network Network framework documentation — Network framework is the recommended API for TCP, UDP, and QUIC on Apple platforms. Building a custom peer-to-peer protocol sample code (aka TicTacToe) Implementing netcat with Network Framework sample code (aka nwcat) Configuring a Wi-Fi accessory to join a network sample code Moving from Multipeer Connectivity to Network Framework forums post Network Extension (including Wi-Fi on iOS): See Network Extension Resources Wi-Fi Fundamentals TN3111 iOS Wi-Fi API overview Wi-Fi Aware framework documentation Wi-Fi on macOS: Forums tag: Core WLAN Core WLAN framework documentation Wi-Fi Fundamentals Secure networking: Forums tags: Security Apple Platform Security support document Preventing Insecure Network Connections documentation — This is all about App Transport Security (ATS). Available trusted root certificates for Apple operating systems support article Requirements for trusted certificates in iOS 13 and macOS 10.15 support article About upcoming limits on trusted certificates support article Apple’s Certificate Transparency policy support article What’s new for enterprise in iOS 18 support article — This discusses new key usage requirements. Technote 2232 HTTPS Server Trust Evaluation Technote 2326 Creating Certificates for TLS Testing QA1948 HTTPS and Test Servers Miscellaneous: More network-related forums tags: 5G, QUIC, Bonjour On FTP forums post Using the Multicast Networking Additional Capability forums post Investigating Network Latency Problems forums post WirelessInsights framework documentation iOS Network Signal Strength Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = "eskimo" + "1" + "@" + "apple.com"

I am seeking assistance with how to properly handle / save / reuse NWConnections when it comes to the NWBrowser vs NWListener. Let me give some context surrounding why I am trying to do what I am. I am building an iOS app that has peer to peer functionality. The design is for a user (for our example the user is Bob) to have N number of devices that have my app installed on it. All these devices are near each other or on the same wifi network. As such I want all the devices to be able to discover each other and automatically connect to each other. For example if Bob had three devices (A, B, C) then A discovers B and C and has a connection to each, B discovers B and C and has a connection to each and finally C discovers A and B and has a connection to each. In the app there is a concept of a leader and a follower. A leader device issues commands to the follower devices. A follower device just waits for commands. For our example device A is the leader and devices B and C are followers. Any follower device can opt to become a leader. So if Bob taps the “become leader” button on device B - device B sends out a message to all the devices it’s connected to telling them it is becoming the new leader. Device B doesn’t need to do anything but device A needs to set itself as a follower. This detail is to show my need to have everyone connected to everyone. Please note that I am using .includePeerToPeer = true in my NWParameters. I am using http/3 and QUIC. I am using P12 identity for TLS1.3. I am successfully able to verify certs in sec_protocal_options_set_verify_block. I am able to establish connections - both from the NWBrowser and from NWListener. My issue is that it’s flaky. I found that I have to put a 3 second delay prior to establishing a connection to a peer found by the NWBrowser. I also opted to not save the incoming connection from NWListener. I only save the connection I created from the peer I found in NWBrowser. For this example there is Device X and Device Y. Device X discovers device Y and connects to it and saves the connection. Device Y discovers device X and connects to it and saves the connection. When things work they work great - I am able to send messages back and forth. Device X uses the saved connection to send a message to device Y and device Y uses the saved connection to send a message to device X. Now here come the questions. Do I save the connection I create from the peer I discovered from the NWBrowser? Do I save the connection I get from my NWListener via newConnectionHandler? And when I save a connection (be it from NWBrowser or NWListener) am I able to reuse it to send data over (ie “i am the new leader command”)? When my NWBrowser discovers a peer, should I be able to build a connection and connect to it immediately? I know if I save the connection I create from the peer I discover I am able to send messages with it. I know if I save the connection from NWListener - I am NOT able to send messages with it — but should I be able to? I have a deterministic algorithm for who makes a connection to who. Each device has an ID - it is a UUID I generate when the app loads - I store it in UserDefaults and the next time I try and fetch it so I’m not generating new UUIDs all the time. I set this deviceID as the name of the NWListener.Service I create. As a result the peer a NWBrowser discovers has the deviceID set as its name. Due to this the NWBrowser is able to determine if it should try and connect to the peer or if it should not because the discovered peer is going to try and connect to it. So the algorithm above would be great if I could save and use the connection from NWListener to send messages over.

Hello, We use the Network API in our macOS ObjectiveC applications to create a small web server. With macOS Sequoia or Tahoe (not with Sonoma), downloading files from another computer using the built-in ethernet port is way too slow. Steps to reproduce: Computer A (using macOS Tahoe or Sonoma), run an application using the Network APIs to create a webserver Make sure that this computer connects to the network using the Ethernet port, there is no issue when using WiFi On computer B, make an HTTP request to download a 20MB file => it will take about 30 seconds to download => way too slow... We tested with: if on computer A you run a web server using the GCD API instead of Network, it takes 0.2 seconds to download the file => no issue on computer A disable TSO, it improves the results, but that's not a long term solution as it doesn't hold when rebooting I can provide sample code to demonstrate this if needed. This is a new issue as it's been a while we use that code, and only noticed it recently, and macOS Sonoma is not impacted. Thank you for the help you can provide. Pierre

Hi, when I perform an overlay installation via a PKG on macOS for an application containing the NEFilterDataProvider functionality, there is a chance that the entire system network becomes unreachable. Disabling the corresponding Content Filter in "System Settings > Network > Filters" immediately restores network connectivity. This issue does not occur every time, with a frequency of approximately 1 in 20 installation attempts.  The following details may help identify the problem: The Filter.app containing the NEFilterDataProvider resides within the main app's Resources directory, e.g., /Applications/Main.app/Contents/Resources/Filter.app Main.app is installed via a PKG; the issue typically occurs during an overlay installation of Main.app. The NEFilterDataProvider operates as a System Extension. The func handleNewFlow(_ flow: NEFilterFlow) -> NEFilterNewFlowVerdict {} returns .allow. Wireshark packet captures show TCP packets but no UDP packets; TCP handshakes cannot complete. Disabling the corresponding content filter in "System Settings > Network > Filters" restores the network; re-enabling it breaks connectivity again. After waiting for a period, approximately 30-60 minutes, network connectivity can recover automatically. What causes this and how can it be fixed? Any workarounds?

Are the Wifi-Aware's WAEndpoint's discovered ephemeral? I'm trying to understand what's the best way to reconnect a disconnected WifiAware connection - Can I just cache the endpoint and start a new connection with the same endpoint or do I need to browse again and get a new WAEndpoint? My use case requires both WifiAware connection to another device and the devices also need to be connected to infrastructure wifi most of the time. I'm concerned about the WifiAware's connection having any impact on infrastructure wifi. What is the impact on the infrastructure wifi here in comparison to using the Apple peer to peer wifi(That Multipeer framework or Network framework use)?

Hello Apple Support Team, We are experiencing a performance issue with HTTP/3 in our iOS application during testing. Problem Description: Network requests using HTTP/3 are significantly slower than expected. This issue occurs on both Wi-Fi and 4G networks, with both IPv4 and IPv6. The same setup worked correctly in an earlier experiment. Key Observations: The slowdown disappears when the device uses: · A personal hotspot. · Network Link Conditioner (with no limitations applied). · Internet sharing from a MacBook via USB (where traffic was also inspected with Wireshark without issues). The problem is specific to HTTP/3 and does not occur with HTTP/2. The issue is reproducible on iOS 15, 18.7, and the latest iOS 26 beta. HTTP/3 is confirmed to be active (via assumeHttp3Capable and Alt-Svc header). Crucially, the same backend endpoint works with normal performance on Android devices and using curl with HTTP/3 support from the same network. I've checked the CFNetwork logs in the Console but haven't found any suspicious errors or obvious clues that explain the slowdown. We are using a standard URLSession with basic configuration. Attempted to collect qlog diagnostics by setting the QUIC_LOG_DIRECTORY=~/ tmp environment variable, but the logs were not generated. Question: What could cause HTTP/3 performance to improve only when the device is connected through a hotspot, unrestricted Network Link Conditioner, or USB-tethered connection? The fact that Android and curl work correctly points to an issue specific to the iOS network stack. Are there known conditions or policies (e.g., related to network interface handling, QoS, or specific packet processing) that could lead to this behavior? Additionally, why might the qlog environment variable fail to produce logs, and are there other ways to obtain detailed HTTP/3 diagnostic information from iOS? Any guidance on further diagnostic steps or specific system logs to examine would be greatly appreciated. Thank you for your assistance.

Reproduce Same SIM card with 4G, same testing location, connected to the same server, xcode debugging game applications, network/profile retrotransmitted, Avg round trip to view data iPhone17， Turn off 4G and turn on WiFi. All the above indicators are acceptable iPhone17， Turn on 4G, turn off WiFi, retry with retransmission and very high Avg round trip iPhone14-16， Turn on 4G and turn off WiFi. All the above indicators are acceptable App Unity3d project .netframe4.0 C# Socket Other Many developers in Chinese forums have provided feedback on this issue

We have observed a per-process limitation on the number of simultaneous nw_connection_t objects in certain macOS environments. On some systems, this limit does not appear to apply, but on others the limitation is reproducible. When a process attempts to establish a large number of connections (e.g. 512+), some connections enter the nw_connection_state_waiting state and report the POSIX error “Cannot allocate memory”. These connections remain stuck indefinitely, even after other connections are deallocated and resources should theoretically be available again. This behavior severely impacts use cases such as transparent proxies implemented via the NetworkExtension framework, which intercept system-wide traffic and must open connections on behalf of all client processes. In this scenario, a per-process limit effectively becomes a system-wide limit, leading to unexpected and hard-to-diagnose network failures in client applications. So, is there any way to disable this restriction for Network Extension processes? Are there any system settings that could affect this limitation and be modified by users?

Hi Apple Engineers and fellow developers, I'm a student developer working on an educational focus management app that helps users hide distracting apps during study sessions. The app consists of: macOS app: Simple "Hide apps" button that triggers app hidding sessions iOS app: Uses Screen Time API to temporarily hide selected apps from home screen Communication: Bonjour networking between Mac and iPhone for session coordination The Challenge My app requires two entitlements that aren't available with Personal Developer Teams: com.apple.developer.family-controls (for Screen Time API) com.apple.developer.networking.multicast (for Bonjour device discovery) Current Error Messages text Cannot create a iOS App Development provisioning profile for "focuser.focuser-app". Personal development teams, including "My Name", do not support the Family Controls (Development) capability. Provisioning profile doesn't include the com.apple.developer.family-controls and com.apple.developer.networking.multicast entitlements. My Question for Apple Engineers Is there any legitimate way to test these privacy-sensitive APIs on my own devices for educational/learning purposes without purchasing the $99/year Apple Developer Program membership? I understand the security reasons behind these restrictions, but as a student just learning iOS development, it creates a significant barrier to experimenting with these technologies.

I would like to understand the behaviour of Network framework when I have established a connection between 2 iOS devices which are connected through LAN and the same Wifi. Assumptions: Enabled includePeerToPeer. Devices are discovered and connected through Bonjour: When the connection establishes for the first time, does it automatically decide which interface to pick? I see some posts which point to Happy Eyeball algorithm but that seem to point more towards ipv4 vs ipv6 rather than Wifi vs LAN vs P2P. In the middle of a connection, if the established connection has issues, does the Network framework automatically switch to the best available interface? If not, I would assume the app will have to handle the switching in betterPathUpdateHandler callback? I’m curious what needs to be done here. Do I just create a new connection and hope that it picks the actual better path? The NWInterface.InterfaceType doesnt have a type for peer to peer wifi. Does that mean that when the interface actually switches to peer to peer, the InterfaceType will be other? It would be great if there is a workflow or example of how this needs to be handled with multiple available Interfaces.

Explanation of the issue When tethering is enabled and a wireless connection is established, there are instances where an IP address is not assigned. Steps to Reproduce the Issue (if possible) Enable iPhone tethering and connect wirelessly using 11ax. Expected Result The iPhone assigns an IP address, enabling network connectivity. Actual Result Observed DHCP negotiation failed. After attempting communication with the DHCP server via DHCP Discover, a DHCP Offer was returned from the iPhone. If this was missed, it would retry by performing another DHCP Discover. However, the iPhone does not issue a DHCP Offer no matter how many times it retries. The IP address is not assigned unless the wireless connection is disconnected and reconnected. If the initial Discover is missed, does this invalidate subsequent Offer retries? The above issue has been confirmed on iPhone 17 Pro and iPhone 16. It does not appear to occur on iPhone 15.

I have some confusion around the usage of DeviceDiscoveryUI. The documentation suggests that it is available only on TVOS. But with the recent announcement of WifiAware, it has been used in iOS devices as well. Within DeviceDiscoveryUI, the DevicePicker or the DevicePairingView documentation seems to be available with iOS. Is this just a documentation mistake? Followup - Can I use DeviceDiscoveryUI's DevicePicker/ DevicePairingView to discover devices through Bonjour and then establish a connection through Network framework?

Enabling Private Relay seems to block XHR in Safari from reaching a local HTTPS server hosted by an iOS app, though it works in other browsers. Before (working): JS → https://local.example.com → 127.0.0.1 → OK After (blocked / no DNS reply probably): JS → https://local.example.com → ERR Is there any way to restore local domain access or mitigate this issue?

Hi, Since iOS 26 (and any other apple system with a 26 version) there is a very weird behavior in the whole apple ecosystem (iOS, iPadOS, macOS and visionOS). I'm self-hosting a web project called mempool (https://github.com/Retropex/mempool). This project is entirely self-hosted on my own infrastructure, so I have advanced control to be sure it's just not an anti-DDoS feature that makes the bug happen. So the bug is once I visit my website, for example this page (https://mempool.guide/tx/d86192252a6631831e55f814aea901e65407b6dbda77e1abdea8ec27861e9682) the OS will lose the ability to connect to the underlying IP of the domain (mempool.guide) but the issue seems to affect only the HTTPS/HTTP port (443/80). The issue is system wide, not only is Safari. For exemple I have another domain that resolve to the same IP (haf.ovh) and if this link above trigger the bug then I will also lose the ability to connect to https://haf.ovh A temporary fix that I have is that if I turn off wifi/cellular then I turn it on again I can connect again to my server again until the bug is triggered again. I have done test with tcpdump on my server and the connection isn't making it to my server that's why I think it's an OS issue, especially given the fix above. This issue can be reproduced on any apple device out of the box with a system with >v26. All device (Mac, iPad, iPhone, vision) with version pre-26 are completely unaffected by the bug and can freely explore the website without loosing the connection macOS is less affected by this bug, it can be random with it. With iOS/iPadOS it's systematic. Another thing to note is that the same URL on firefox/chrome for iOS doesn't trigger the bug. Let me know if anyone has an idea on what's going on. Thanks, Léo.

Hi Everyone, I have a query regarding capturing an NWConnection instance inside the receive closure, which gets invoked whenever some raw bytes are received. I want to know whether this will create a strong retain cycle or not. My understanding is that NWConnection holds a reference to the closure, and if I capture the NWConnection instance inside the closure, the closure will have a reference back to the connection, which, according to my understanding, creates a strong reference cycle. Is my understanding correct? If so, how can we break the strong reference cycle — using a capture list, or is there any other way as well? Thanks

Questions about FTP crop up from time-to-time here on DevForums. In most cases I write a general “don’t use FTP” response, but I don’t have time to go into all the details. I’ve created this post as a place to collect all of those details, so I can reference them in other threads. IMPORTANT Apple’s official position on FTP is: All our FTP APIs have been deprecated, and you should avoid using deprecated APIs. Apple has been slowly removing FTP support from the user-facing parts of our system. The most recent example of this is that we removed the ftp command-line tool in macOS 10.13. You should avoid the FTP protocol and look to adopt more modern alternatives. The rest of this post is an informational explanation of the overall FTP picture. This post is locked so I can keep it focused. If you have questions or comments, please do create a new thread in the App & System Services > Networking subtopic and I’ll respond there. Don’t Use FTP FTP is a very old and very crufty protocol. Certain things that seem obvious to us now — like being able to create a GUI client that reliably shows a directory listing in a platform-independent manner — aren’t possible to do in FTP. However, by far the biggest problem with FTP is that it provides no security [1]. Specifically, the FTP protocol: Provides no on-the-wire privacy, so anyone can see the data you transfer Provides no client-authenticates-server authentication, so you have no idea whether you’re talking to the right server Provides no data integrity, allowing an attacker to munge your data in transit Transfers user names and passwords in the clear Using FTP for anonymous downloads may be acceptable (see the explanation below) but most other uses of FTP are completely inappropriate for the modern Internet. IMPORTANT You should only use FTP for anonymous downloads if you have an independent way to check the integrity of the data you’ve downloaded. For example, if you’re downloading a software update, you could use code signing to check its integrity. If you don’t check the integrity of the data you’ve downloaded, an attacker could substitute a malicious download instead. This would be especially bad in, say, the software update case. These fundamental problems with the FTP protocol mean that it’s not a priority for Apple. This is reflected in the available APIs, which is the subject of the next section. FTP APIs Apple provides two FTP APIs: All Apple platforms provide FTP downloads via URLSession. Most Apple platforms (everything except watchOS) support CFFTPStream, which allows for directory listings, downloads, uploads, and directory creation. All of these FTP APIs are now deprecated: URLSession was deprecated for the purposes of FTP in the 2022 SDKs (macOS 13, iOS 16, iPadOS 16, tvOS 16, watchOS 9) [2]. CFFTPStream was deprecated in the 2016 SDKs (macOS 10.11, iOS 9, iPadOS 9, tvOS 9). CFFTPStream still works about as well as it ever did, which is not particularly well. Specifically: There is at least one known crashing bug (r. 35745763), albeit one that occurs quite infrequently. There are clear implementation limitations — like the fact that CFFTPCreateParsedResourceListing assumes a MacRoman text encoding (r. 7420589) — that won’t be fixed. If you’re looking for an example of how to use these APIs, check out SimpleFTPSample. Note This sample hasn’t been updated since 2013 and is unlikely to ever be updated given Apple’s position on FTP. The FTP support in URLSession has significant limitations: It only supports FTP downloads; there’s no support for uploads or any other FTP operations. It doesn’t support resumable FTP downloads [3]. It doesn’t work in background sessions. That prevents it from running FTP downloads in the background on iOS. It’s only supported in classic loading mode. See the usesClassicLoadingMode property and the doc comments in <Foundation/NSURLSession.h>. If Apple’s FTP APIs are insufficient for your needs, you’ll need to write or acquire your own FTP library. Before you do that, however, consider switching to an alternative protocol. After all, if you’re going to go to the trouble of importing a large FTP library into your code base, you might as well import a library for a better protocol. The next section discusses some options in this space. Alternative Protocols There are numerous better alternatives to FTP: HTTPS is by far the best alternative to FTP, offering good security, good APIs on Apple platforms, good server support, and good network compatibility. Implementing traditional FTP operations over HTTPS can be a bit tricky. One possible way forward is to enable DAV extensions on the server. FTPS is FTP over TLS (aka SSL). While FTPS adds security to the protocol, which is very important, it still inherits many of FTP’s other problems. Personally I try to avoid this protocol. SFTP is a file transfer protocol that’s completely unrelated to FTP. It runs over SSH, making it a great alternative in many of the ad hoc setups that traditionally use FTP. Apple doesn’t have an API for either FTPS or SFTP, although on macOS you may be able to make some headway by invoking the sftp command-line tool. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = "eskimo" + "1" + "@" + "apple.com" [1] In another thread someone asked me about FTP’s other problems, those not related to security, so let’s talk about that. One of FTP’s implicit design goals was to provide cross-platform support that exposes the target platform. You can think of FTP as being kinda like telnet. When you telnet from Unix to VMS, it doesn’t aim to abstract away VMS commands, so that you can type Unix commands at the VMS prompt. Rather, you’re expected to run VMS commands. FTP is (a bit) like that. This choice made sense back when the FTP protocol was invented. Folks were expecting to use FTP via a command-line client, so there was a human in the loop. If they ran a command and it produced VMS-like output, that was fine because they knew that they were FTPing into a VMS machine. However, most users today are using GUI clients, and this design choice makes it very hard to create a general GUI client for FTP. Let’s consider the simple problem of getting the contents of a directory. When you send an FTP LIST command, the server would historically run the platform native directory list command and pipe the results back to you. To create a GUI client you have to parse that data to extract the file names. Doing that is a serious challenge. Indeed, just the first step, working out the text encoding, is a challenge. Many FTP servers use UTF-8, but some use ISO-Latin-1, some use other standard encodings, some use Windows code pages, and so on. I say “historically” above because there have been various efforts to standardise this stuff, both in the RFCs and in individual server implementations. However, if you’re building a general client you can’t rely on these efforts. After all, the reason why folks continue to use FTP is because of it widespread support. [2] To quote the macOS 13 Ventura Release Notes: FTP is deprecated for URLSession and related APIs. Please adopt modern secure networking protocols such as HTTPS. (92623659) [3] Although you can implement resumable downloads using the lower-level CFFTPStream API, courtesy of the kCFStreamPropertyFTPFileTransferOffset property. Revision History 2025-10-06 Explained that URLSession only supports FTP in classic loading mode. Made other minor editorial changes. 2024-04-15 Added a footnote about FTP’s other problems. Made other minor editorial changes. 2022-08-09 Noted that the FTP support in URLSession is now deprecated. Made other minor editorial changes. 2021-04-06 Fixed the formatting. Fixed some links. 2018-02-23 First posted.

I investigated what network interface names are assigned to carrier networks on a dual SIM iPhone by examining the output of getifaddrs(). (An part of the program used for this is provided below.) ////////////// struct ifaddrs *interfaces = NULL; struct ifaddrs *an_interface = NULL; if (0 == getifaddrs(&interfaces)) { an_interface = interfaces; while (an_interface != NULL) { if( an_interface->ifa_addr->sa_family == AF_INET) { NSString* name = [NSString stringWithUTF8String:an_interface->ifa_name]; NSLog(@"Interface name is: %@", name); } an_interface = an_interface->ifa_next; } } freeifaddrs(interfaces); In this investigation, it appeared that the interface name for the sXGP SIM selected under "iPhone > Settings > Cellular > Cellular Data" was always "pdp_ip0". (A screenshot of "Cellular Data" is provided below. this is sample of sXGP selected )" [QUESTION] Is the SIM selected in Settings of iPhone always assigned to "pdp_ip0"? [BACKGROUND] I am developing a VoIP application and opening sockets by specifying IP addresses for communication. On a dual SIM iPhone, multiple networks (IP addresses) are visible. Therefore, I need to determine which network to use. My question is whether I can reliably make this decision based on the network interface name. If the SIM selected in Settings is always assigned to "pdp_ip0", I intend to open the socket using the IP address of "pdp_ip0". Alternatively, should I use a different method to select the appropriate network interface?

For testing purposes we have code that calls SecTrustEvaluateAsyncWithError() with a trust object containing a hardcoded leaf certificate and the corresponding intermediate certificate required to form a valid chain. Because the leaf certificate has since expired we pass a date in the past via SecTrustSetVerifyDate() at wich the certificate was still valid, but trust evaluation fails: Error Domain=NSOSStatusErrorDomain Code=-67825 "“<redacted>” certificate is not standards compliant" UserInfo={NSLocalizedDescription=“<redacted>” certificate is not standards compliant, NSUnderlyingError=0x600000c282a0 {Error Domain=NSOSStatusErrorDomain Code=-67825 "Certificate 0 “<redacted>” has errors: Certificate Transparency validation required for this use;" UserInfo={NSLocalizedDescription=Certificate 0 “<redacted>” has errors: Certificate Transparency validation required for this use;}}} I know that App Transport Security enforces Certificate Transparency by default, but is there a way around that here?

Title / Summary Crash in libquic.dylib when app is backgrounded and issues an HTTP/3 request Description On iOS 26, the app crashes inside libquic.dylib while performing a network request using HTTP/3 (QUIC) after the app has moved to the background. The crash happens within low-level QUIC / libquic internals. Reproduction Steps Launch the app, perform normal operations. Background the app (press home / switch away). While in background, trigger a network request that uses HTTP/3 / QUIC. Observe that the app crashes (stack trace pointing into libquic.dylib). Expected Behavior The HTTP/3 request in background should either be handled gracefully (fail or complete) without causing a crash; the app must not be terminated due to internal libquic failures. Actual Behavior The app crashes with signals/exceptions coming from libquic.dylib (in the QUIC / packet building / encryption / key state logic) when a HTTP/3 request is made in background. Environment / Device Information • OS: iOS 26 • Device: iPhone 13 Pro Max • Network environment: (Wi-Fi / Cellular) • HTTP/3 support: enabled in URLSession / Network framework Stack Trace： 8eedc0df3d914b0faf8def9af3b21574-symbolicated.crash

I was exploring the scenarios where an NWListener or NWConnection can be invalidated or reclaimed by the OS itself. I came across the document TN2277: Networking and Multitasking, which discusses situations where iOS can reclaim the underlying socket descriptor. The document states: while the app is suspended the system may choose to reclaim resources out from underneath a network socket used by the app, thereby closing the network connection represented by that socket. From this, I understand that when the app is in a suspended state, the OS may reclaim the socket descriptor. My questions are: In what scenarios does the OS not reclaim the socket descriptor while the app is suspended, and in which cases does it reclaim it? When reclamation occurs, does the OS reclaim 'a' single NWListener/NWConnection, or does it reclaim 'all' NWListener/NWConnections opened by the application? Thanks.

We are using wifi_aware demo at https://developer.apple.com/documentation/wifiaware/building-peer-to-peer-apps. We use iPhone 16 with ios26 to install this app successfully for the first time. After then we want to remove some paired devices, but the function used to delete paired device is not founded. So we uninstall the app, and intend to install it again. This time, it jump to the interface displaying the message "This device does not support Wi-Fi Aware". We are confused by this and don't know what to do. Instead of using other devices, how can we successfully install the app on this device. The iphone, Apple computer and Xcode environment maintain the same for sure. We sincerely appreciate your reply.