I'm using NSPersistentCloudKitContainer and in the CloudKit dashboards I have added indexes for all my records modifiedTimestamp queryable, modifiedTimestamp sortable and recordName queryable. But I'm still getting this warning message in the console. <CKError 0x302acf0c0: "Invalid Arguments" (12/2015); server message = "Field 'recordName' is not marked queryable"; op = FF68EFF8D501AED8; uuid = 12C5C84B-EA9B-41A6-AD85-34023827E6FA; container ID = "z.y.x"> error: CoreData+CloudKit: -[NSCloudKitMirroringDelegate _importFinishedWithResult:importer:](1400): <PFCloudKitImporter: 0x30316c1c0>: Import failed with error: <CKError 0x302acf0c0: "Invalid Arguments" (12/2015); server message = "Field 'recordName' is not marked queryable"; op = FF68EFF8D501AED8; uuid = 12C5C84B-EA9B-41A6-AD85-34023827E6FA; container ID = "z.y.x"> error: CoreData+CloudKit: -[NSCloudKitMirroringDelegate recoverFromError:](2312): <NSCloudKitMirroringDelegate: 0x301b1cd20> - Attempting recovery from error: <CKError 0x302acf0c0: "Invalid Arguments" (12/2015); server message = "Field 'recordName' is not marked queryable"; op = FF68EFF8D501AED8; uuid = 12C5C84B-EA9B-41A6-AD85-34023827E6FA; container ID = "z.y.x"> error: CoreData+CloudKit: -[NSCloudKitMirroringDelegate _recoverFromError:withZoneIDs:forStore:inMonitor:](2622): <NSCloudKitMirroringDelegate: 0x301b1cd20> - Failed to recover from error: CKErrorDomain:12 Recovery encountered the following error: (null):0 error: CoreData+CloudKit: -[NSCloudKitMirroringDelegate resetAfterError:andKeepContainer:](612): <NSCloudKitMirroringDelegate: 0x301b1cd20> - resetting internal state after error: <CKError 0x302acf0c0: "Invalid Arguments" (12/2015); server message = "Field 'recordName' is not marked queryable"; op = FF68EFF8D501AED8; uuid = 12C5C84B-EA9B-41A6-AD85-34023827E6FA; container ID = "z.y.x"> error: CoreData+CloudKit: -[NSCloudKitMirroringDelegate _requestAbortedNotInitialized:](2200): <NSCloudKitMirroringDelegate: 0x301b1cd20> - Never successfully initialized and cannot execute request '<NSCloudKitMirroringImportRequest: 0x300738eb0> A3F23AAC-F820-4044-B4B9-28DFAC4DE8D7' due to error: <CKError 0x302acf0c0: "Invalid Arguments" (12/2015); server message = "Field 'recordName' is not marked queryable"; op = FF68EFF8D501AED8; uuid = 12C5C84B-EA9B-41A6-AD85-34023827E6FA; container ID = "z.y.x">

I'm getting a crash in SwiftData but only on one specific device (iPhone 16 pro running 18.2 22C5131e) and not on an ipad or simulator I cant troubleshoot this crash and its quite frustrating, all I am getting is @Query(sort: \Todo.timestamp, order: .reverse) private var todos: [Todo] ForEach(todos.filter { !$0.completed }) { item in // <---crash TodoListView() } and the error is Thread 1: signal SIGABRT An abort signal terminated the process. Such crashes often happen because of an uncaught exception or unrecoverable error or calling the abort() function. and _SwiftData_SwiftUI.Query.wrappedValue.getter : τ_0_1 -> 0x105b98b58 <+160>: ldur x8, [x29, #-0x40] 0x105b98b5c <+164>: ldur x0, [x29, #-0x38] 0x105b98b60 <+168>: ldur x1, [x29, #-0x30] 0x105b98b64 <+172>: ldur x9, [x29, #-0x20] 0x105b98b68 <+176>: stur x9, [x29, #-0x28] 0x105b98b6c <+180>: ldr x8, [x8, #0x8] 0x105b98b70 <+184>: blr x8 0x105b98b74 <+188>: ldur x0, [x29, #-0x28] 0x105b98b78 <+192>: sub sp, x29, #0x10 0x105b98b7c <+196>: ldp x29, x30, [sp, #0x10] 0x105b98b80 <+200>: ldp x20, x19, [sp], #0x20 0x105b98b84 <+204>: ret How do I fix this?

Hi everyone, I am a beginner in iOS/Swift programming. I'm trying to develop a mobile application that allows to mount a network drive in the iphone Files application via the WebDav protocol. I saw on the internet that WebDav is no longer implemented in iOS because considered deprecated by apple. To accomplish this task, I decided to separate responsibilities as follows: Framework: WebDav (responsible for communication with the WebDav server) FileProviderExtension: FileBridge (Responsible for bridging the gap between the WebDav Framework and the iOS Files app) Main App I also have an AppGroup that includes the main application and the fileproviderextension Initially, to measure the feasibility and complexity of this task, I'd like to make a simplistic version that simply displays the files on my drive in the Files app, without necessarily being able to interact with them. FileProviderExtension.swift: import FileProvider import WebDav class FileProviderExtension: NSObject, NSFileProviderReplicatedExtension { private var webDavService: WebDavService? required init(domain: NSFileProviderDomain) { super.init() self.webDavService = WebDavService(baseURL: URL(string: "https://www.mydrive.com/drive")!) } func invalidate() { // TODO: cleanup any resources } func item(for identifier: NSFileProviderItemIdentifier, request: NSFileProviderRequest, completionHandler: @escaping (NSFileProviderItem?, Error?) -> Void) -> Progress { let progress = Progress(totalUnitCount: 1) Task { do { if let items = try await webDavService?.propfind(path: identifier.rawValue, depth: 1), let item = items.first(where: { $0.itemIdentifier == identifier }) { completionHandler(item, nil) } else { completionHandler(nil, NSError(domain: NSCocoaErrorDomain, code: NSFileNoSuchFileError, userInfo: nil)) } } catch { completionHandler(nil, error) } } return progress } func fetchContents(for itemIdentifier: NSFileProviderItemIdentifier, version requestedVersion: NSFileProviderItemVersion?, request: NSFileProviderRequest, completionHandler: @escaping (URL?, NSFileProviderItem?, Error?) -> Void) -> Progress { let progress = Progress(totalUnitCount: 1) Task { do { guard let service = webDavService else { throw WebDavError.invalidResponse } let data = try await service.get(fileAt: itemIdentifier.rawValue) let tempURL = FileManager.default.temporaryDirectory.appendingPathComponent(itemIdentifier.rawValue) try data.write(to: tempURL) completionHandler(tempURL, nil, nil) } catch { completionHandler(nil, nil, error) } } return progress } func createItem(basedOn itemTemplate: NSFileProviderItem, fields: NSFileProviderItemFields, contents url: URL?, options: NSFileProviderCreateItemOptions = [], request: NSFileProviderRequest, completionHandler: @escaping (NSFileProviderItem?, NSFileProviderItemFields, Bool, Error?) -> Void) -> Progress { // TODO: a new item was created on disk, process the item's creation completionHandler(itemTemplate, [], false, nil) return Progress() } func modifyItem(_ item: NSFileProviderItem, baseVersion version: NSFileProviderItemVersion, changedFields: NSFileProviderItemFields, contents newContents: URL?, options: NSFileProviderModifyItemOptions = [], request: NSFileProviderRequest, completionHandler: @escaping (NSFileProviderItem?, NSFileProviderItemFields, Bool, Error?) -> Void) -> Progress { // TODO: an item was modified on disk, process the item's modification completionHandler(nil, [], false, NSError(domain: NSCocoaErrorDomain, code: NSFeatureUnsupportedError, userInfo:[:])) return Progress() } func deleteItem(identifier: NSFileProviderItemIdentifier, baseVersion version: NSFileProviderItemVersion, options: NSFileProviderDeleteItemOptions = [], request: NSFileProviderRequest, completionHandler: @escaping (Error?) -> Void) -> Progress { // TODO: an item was deleted on disk, process the item's deletion completionHandler(NSError(domain: NSCocoaErrorDomain, code: NSFeatureUnsupportedError, userInfo:[:])) return Progress() } func enumerator(for containerItemIdentifier: NSFileProviderItemIdentifier, request: NSFileProviderRequest) throws -> NSFileProviderEnumerator { return FileProviderEnumerator(enumeratedItemIdentifier: containerItemIdentifier, service: webDavService) } } Here's the code I use to initialize my domain in the main app files: fileprivate func registerFileProviderDomain() { let domainIdentifier = NSFileProviderDomainIdentifier("FileProviderExtension Bundle Identifier") let domain = NSFileProviderDomain(identifier: domainIdentifier, displayName: "My Drive") NSFileProviderManager.add(domain) { error in NSFileProviderManager.add(domain) { error in if let error = error { print("Error cannot add domain file provider : \(error.localizedDescription)") } else { print("Success domain file provider added") } } } I can't get rid of the Error : Error cannot add domain file provider : The operation couldn’t be completed. Invalid argument. I don't know what I'm missing Please help me understand

Hello, on every Apple device, iPhone/Watch I have the option to install developer beta versions. I would like to unsubscribe from developer beta versions - not have them in settings. I know that developer beta is assigned to my iCloud account. After logging out and restoring factory settings, the tab disappears. When I log into my iCloud account, it appears everywhere. I did not sign up for developer beta. How do I remove it?

Hello, I apologize if this post could be slightly out of forum topic but I have one issue that I cannot solve. I tried a few times to call Apple support but the only indication that have given to me is to try with this forum. The issue I have is simple. Sometimes the modifications performed on iCloud Drive on one computer are not properly synced between the local folder /Users/[username]/Library/Mobile Documents/... and the cloud and therefore are not shared across all devices that use the same iCloud Drive. This is very disturbing as it may lead to a data loss. I would like to write a simple software that activates the iCloud Drive sync between the local iCloud folder /Users/[username]/Library/Mobile Documents/... and the Cloud. A simple macOS bash script would be fine but also other pieces of software are welcome. Can anyone please help me? Thanks! Daniele

I have integrated CloudKit into a CoreData application and am ready to deploy the schema to production but keep getting an "internal error" when trying to deploy to production or reset my CloudKit environment. I have attached images of what I am seeing including one of the console error. Is there any way to resolve this?

I have a widely-used app that lets users keep track of personal data. This data is persisted with SwiftData, and synced with CloudKit. I understand that if the user's iCloud account changes on a device (for example, user logs out or toggles off an app's access to iCloud), then NSPersistentCloudKitContainer will erase the local data records on app launch. This is intentional behavior, intended as a privacy feature. However, we are receiving regular reports from users for whom the system has incorrectly indicated that the app's access to iCloud is unavailable, even when the user hasn't logged out or toggled off permission to access iCloud. This triggers the behavior to clear the local records, and even though the data is still available in iCloud, to the user, it looks like their data has disappeared for no reason. Helping the user find and troubleshoot their iCloud app data settings can be very difficult, since in many cases the user has no idea what iCloud is, and we can't link them directly to the correct settings screen. We seem to get these reports most frequently from users whose iCloud storage is full (which feels like punishment for not paying for additional storage), but we've also received reports from users who have enough storage space available (and are logged in and have the app's iCloud data permissions toggled on). It appears to happen randomly, as far as we can tell. I found a blog post from two years ago from another app developer who encountered the same issue: https://crunchybagel.com/nspersistentcloudkitcontainer/#:~:text=The%20problem%20we%20were%20experiencing To work around this and improve the user experience, we want to use CKContainer.accountStatus to check if the user has an available iCloud account, and if not, disable the CloudKit sync before it erases the local data. I've found steps to accomplish this workaround using CoreData, but I'm not sure how to best modify the ModelContainer's configuration after receiving the CKAccountStatus when using SwiftData. I've put together this approach so far; is this the right way to handle disabling/enabling sync based on account status? import SwiftUI import SwiftData import CloudKit @main struct AccountStatusTestApp: App { @State private var modelContainer: ModelContainer? var body: some Scene { WindowGroup { if let modelContainer { ContentView() .modelContainer(modelContainer) } else { ProgressView("Loading...") .task { await initializeModelContainer() } } } } func initializeModelContainer() async { let schema = Schema([ Item.self, ]) do { let accountStatus = try await CKContainer.default().accountStatus() let modelConfiguration = ModelConfiguration( schema: schema, cloudKitDatabase: accountStatus == .available ? .private("iCloud.com.AccountStatusTestApp") : .none ) do { let container = try ModelContainer(for: schema, configurations: [modelConfiguration]) modelContainer = container } catch { print("Could not create ModelContainer: \(error)") } } catch { print("Could not determine iCloud account status: \(error)") } } } I understand that bypassing the clearing of local data when the iCloud account is "unavailable" introduces possible issues with data being mingled on shared devices, but I plan to mitigate that with warning messages when users are in this state. This would be a far more preferable user experience than what's happening now.

Hi, I'm working on a macOS app that utilizes SwiftData to save some user generated content to their private databases. It is not clear to me at which point the app I made starts using the production database. I assumed that if I produce a Release build that it will be using the prod db, but that doesn't seem to be the case. I made the mistake of distributing my app to users before "going to prod" with CloudKit. So after I realized what I had done, I inspected my CloudKit dashboard and records and I found the following: For my personal developer account the data is saved in the Developer database correctly and I can inspect it. When I use the "Act as iCloud account" feature and use one of my other accounts to inspect the data, I notice that for the other user, the data is neither in the Development environment nor the Production environment. Which leads me to believe it is only stored locally on that user's machine, since the app does in fact work, it's just not syncing with other devices of the same user. So, my question is: how do I "deploy to production"? I know that there is a Deploy Schema Changes button in the CloudKit dashboard. At which point should I press that? If I press it now, before distributing a new version of my app, will that somehow "signal" the already running apps on user's machines to start using the Production database? Is there a setting in Xcode that I need to check for my Release build, so that the app does in fact start using the production db? Is there a way to detect in the code whether the app is using the Production database or not? It would be useful so I can write appropriate migration logic, since I don't want to loose existing data users already have saved locally.

I've got an application built on top of SwiftData (+ CloudKit) which is published to App Store. I've got a problem where on each app update, the data saved in the database is duplicated to the end user. Obviously this isn't wanted behaviour, and I'm really looking forward to fixing it. However, given the restrictions of SwiftData, I haven't found a single fix for this. The data duplication happens automatically on the first initial sync after the update. My guess is that it's because it doesn't detect the data already in the device, so it pulls all data from iCloud and appends it to the database where data in reality exists.

I'm using SwiftData with an @Model and am also using an @ModelActor. I've fixed all concurrency issues and have migrated to Swift 6. I am getting a console error that I do not understand how to clear. I get this error in Swift 6 and Swift 5. I do not experience any issue with the app. It seems to be working well. But I want to try to get all issues taken care of. I am using the latest Xcode beta. error: the replacement path doesn't exist: "/var/folders/1q/6jw9d6mn0gx1znh1n19z2v9r0000gp/T/swift-generated-sources/@_swiftmacro_17MyAppName14MyModelC4type18_PersistedPr> opertyfMa.swift"

I am trying to port my application over to CloudKit. My app worked fine before, but then I made scheme of changes and am trying to deploy to a new container. For some reason, the database is not being created after I create the container through Xcode. I think I have configured the app correctly and a container was created, but no records were deployed. My app current stores data locally on individual devices just fine but they don't sync with each other. That's why I would like to use CloudKit. See screenshot from Xcode of where I have configured the container. I also have background notifications enabled. Also see screenshot from console where the container has been created, but no records have been. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thank you

I've been trying to setup a successful migration, but it keeps failing with this error: NSCloudKitMirroringDelegate are not reusable and should have a lifecycle tied to a given instance of NSPersistentStore. I can't find any information about this online. I added breakpoints throughout the code in willMigrate, and it originally failed on this line: try? context.save() I removed that, and it still failed. After I reload the app, it doesn't run the migration again and the app loads successfully. I figured since it crashed, it would keep trying, but I guess not. Here's how my migration is setup. enum MigrationV1ToV2: SchemaMigrationPlan { static var schemas: [any VersionedSchema.Type] { [SchemaV1.self, SchemaV2.self] } static var stages: [MigrationStage] { [stage] } static let stage = MigrationStage.custom( fromVersion: SchemaV1.self, toVersion: SchemaV2.self, willMigrate: { context in // Get cycles let cycles = try? context.fetch(FetchDescriptor<SchemaV1.Cycle>()) if let cycles { for cycle in cycles { // Create new recurring objects based on what's in the cycle for income in cycle.income { let recurring = SchemaV2.Recurring(name: income.name, frequency: income.frequency, kind: .income) recurring.addAmount(.init(date: cycle.startDate, amount: income.amount)) context.insert(recurring) } for expense in cycle.expenses { let recurring = SchemaV2.Recurring(name: expense.name, frequency: expense.frequency, kind: .expense) recurring.addAmount(.init(date: cycle.startDate, amount: expense.amount)) context.insert(recurring) } for savings in cycle.savings { let recurring = SchemaV2.Recurring(name: savings.name, frequency: savings.frequency, kind: .savings) recurring.addAmount(.init(date: cycle.startDate, amount: savings.amount)) context.insert(recurring) } for investment in cycle.investments { let recurring = SchemaV2.Recurring(name: investment.name, frequency: investment.frequency, kind: .investment) recurring.addAmount(.init(date: cycle.startDate, amount: investment.amount)) context.insert(recurring) } } //try? context.save() } else { print("The cycles were not able to be fetched.") } }, didMigrate: { context in // Get new recurring objects let newRecurring = try? context.fetch(FetchDescriptor<SchemaV2.Recurring>()) if let newRecurring { for recurring in newRecurring { // Get all recurring with the same name and kind let sameName = newRecurring.filter({ $0.name == recurring.name && $0.kind == recurring.kind }) // Add amount history to recurring object, and then remove matching for match in sameName { recurring.amountHistory.append(contentsOf: match.amountHistory) context.delete(match) } } //try? context.save() } else { print("The new recurring objects could not be fetched.") } } ) } Here's is my modelContainer in the app file. There is a fatal error occurring here that's crashing the app. var sharedModelContainer: ModelContainer = { let schema = Schema(versionedSchema: SchemaV2.self) let modelConfiguration = ModelConfiguration(schema: schema, isStoredInMemoryOnly: false) do { return try ModelContainer( for: schema, migrationPlan: MigrationV1ToV2.self, configurations: [modelConfiguration] ) } catch { fatalError("Could not create ModelContainer: \(error)") } }() Does anyone have any suggestions for this? EDIT: I found this error in the console that may be relevant. BUG IN CLIENT OF CLOUDKIT: Registering a handler for a CKScheduler activity identifier that has already been registered (com.apple.coredata.cloudkit.activity.export.8F7A1261-4324-40B4-B041-886DF36FBF0A). CloudKit setup failed because it couldn't register a handler for the export activity. There is another instance of this persistent store actively syncing with CloudKit in this process. And here is the fatal error Fatal error: Could not create ModelContainer: SwiftDataError(_error: SwiftData.SwiftDataError._Error.loadIssueModelContainer, _explanation: nil)

I am having problems when I first loads the app. The time it takes for the Items to be sync from my CloudKit to my local CoreData is too long. Code I have the model below defined by my CoreData. public extension Item { @nonobjc class func fetchRequest() -> NSFetchRequest<Item> { NSFetchRequest<Item>(entityName: "Item") } @NSManaged var createdAt: Date? @NSManaged var id: UUID? @NSManaged var image: Data? @NSManaged var usdz: Data? @NSManaged var characteristics: NSSet? @NSManaged var parent: SomeParent? } image and usdz columns are both marked as BinaryData and Attribute Allows External Storage is also selected. I made a Few tests loading the data when the app is downloaded for the first time. I am loading on my view using the below code: @FetchRequest( sortDescriptors: [NSSortDescriptor(keyPath: \Item.createdAt, ascending: true)] ) private var items: FetchedResults<Item> var body: some View { VStack { ScrollView(.vertical, showsIndicators: false) { LazyVGrid(columns: columns, spacing: 40) { ForEach(items, id: \.self) { item in Text(item.id) } } } } } Test 1 - Just loads everything When I have on my cloudKit images and usdz a total of 100mb data, it takes around 140 seconds to show some data on my view (Not all items were sync, that takes much longer time) Test 2 - Trying getting only 10 items at the time () This takes the same amount of times the long one . I have added the following in my class, and removed the @FetchRequest: @State private var items: [Item] = [] // CK @State private var isLoading = false @MainActor func loadMoreData() { guard !isLoading else { return } isLoading = true let fetchRequest = NSFetchRequest<Item>(entityName: "Item") fetchRequest.predicate = NSPredicate(format: "title != nil AND title != ''") fetchRequest.fetchLimit = 10 fetchRequest.fetchOffset = items.count fetchRequest.predicate = getPredicate() fetchRequest.sortDescriptors = [NSSortDescriptor(keyPath: \Item.createdAt, ascending: true)] do { let newItems = try viewContext.fetch(fetchRequest) DispatchQueue.main.async { items.append(contentsOf: newItems) isLoading = false } } catch {} } Test 2 - Remove all images and usdz from CloudKit set all as Null Setting all items BinaryData to null, it takes around 8 seconds to Show the list. So as we can see here, all the solutions that I found are bad. I just wanna go to my CloudKit and fetch the data with my CoreData. And if possible to NOT fetch all the data because that would be not possible (imagine the future with 10 or 20GB or data) What is the solution for this loading problem? What do I need to do/fix in order to load lets say 10 items first, then later on the other items and let the user have a seamlessly experience? Questions What are the solutions I have when the user first loads the app? How to force CoreData to query directly cloudKit? Does CoreData + CloudKit + NSPersistentCloudKitContainer will download the whole CloudKit database in my local, is that good???? Storing images as BinaryData with Allow external Storage does not seems to be working well, because it is downloading the image even without the need for the image right now, how should I store the Binary data or Images in this case?

Hi, I have designed an app which needs to reschedule notifications according to the user's calendar at midnight. The function has been implemented successfully via backgroundtask. But since the app has enabled iCloud sync, some users will edit their calendar on their iPad and expect that the notifications will be sent promptly to them on iPhone without launching the app on their iPhone. But the problem is that if they haven't launched the app on their iPhone, iCloud sync won't happen. The notifications on their iPhone haven't been updated and will be sent wrongly. How can I design some codes to let iCloud sync across the devices without launching the app at midnight and then reschedule notifications?

Hello, When attempting to create a CKShare on a personal device linked to a Family iCloud plan (non-primary account holder), the operation fails with a quotaExceeded error. This occurs with the Family plan having 1.5TB available storage space. This is also causing a data loss for the object(s) that were attempted to be shared. Details Account Type: Family iCloud Plan (2TB total storage) Current Family Usage: 399GB iCloud Account Usage: 70 GB Steps to Reproduce: Have an iCloud account with storage over the 5GB free space limit. Be on a part of a iCloud Family Plan as the non-primary account holder. Have storage space available in the Family Plan Attempt to start a CloudKit Share/Collaboration on the device. Observe that the CKShare creation fails with a quotaExceeded error. Expected Behavior: The CKShare should be successfully created, reflecting the total available storage of the Family plan. Observed Behavior: The CKShare fails to be created with quotaExceeded. Additional Testing On a test device using an iCloud account with no stored data, the CKShare was created successfully and shared without issue. Suspected Cause The CKShare functionality is verifying the personal storage allocation of the iCloud account and failing without checking total available storage provided by the Family plan.

I've already submitted this as a bug report to Apple, but I am posting here so others can save themselves some troubleshooting. This is submitted as FB14337982 with an attached complete Xcode project to replicate. In iOS 17 we use a ModelActor to download data which is saved as an Event, and then save it to SwiftData with a relationship to a Location. In iOS 18 22A5307d we are seeing that this code no longer persists the relationship to the Location, but still saves the Event. If we put a breakpoint in that ModelActor we see that the object graph is correct within the ModelActor stack trace at the time we call modelContext.save(). However, after saving, the relationship is missing from the default.store SQLite file, and of course from the app UI. Here is a toy example showing how inserting an Employee into a Company using a ModelActor gives unexpected results in iOS 18 22A5307d but works as expected in iOS 17. It appears that no relationships data survives being saved in a ModelActor.ModelContext. Also note there seems to be a return of the old bug that saving this data in the ModelActor does not update the @Query in the UI in iOS 18 but does so in iOS 17. Models @Model final class Employee { var uuid: UUID = UUID() @Relationship(deleteRule: .nullify) public var company: Company? /// For a concise display @Transient var name: String { self.uuid.uuidString.components(separatedBy: "-").first ?? "NIL" } init(company: Company?) { self.company = company } } @Model final class Company { var uuid: UUID = UUID() @Relationship(deleteRule: .cascade, inverse: \Employee.company) public var employees: [Employee]? = [] /// For a concise display @Transient var name: String { self.uuid.uuidString.components(separatedBy: "-").first ?? "NIL" } init() { } } ModelActor import OSLog private let logger = Logger(subsystem: Bundle.main.bundleIdentifier!, category: "SimpleModelActor") @ModelActor final actor SimpleModelActor { func addEmployeeTo(CompanyWithID companyID: PersistentIdentifier?) { guard let companyID, let company: Company = self[companyID, as: Company.self] else { logger.error("Could not get a company") return } let newEmployee = Employee(company: company) modelContext.insert(newEmployee) logger.notice("Created employee \(newEmployee.name) in Company \(newEmployee.company?.name ?? "NIL")") try! modelContext.save() } } ContentView import OSLog private let logger = Logger(subsystem: Bundle.main.bundleIdentifier!, category: "View") struct ContentView: View { @Environment(\.modelContext) private var modelContext @Query private var companies: [Company] @Query private var employees: [Employee] @State private var simpleModelActor: SimpleModelActor! var body: some View { ScrollView { LazyVStack { DisclosureGroup("Instructions") { Text(""" Instructions: 1. In iOS 17, tap Add in View. Observe that an employee is added with Company matching the shown company name. 2. In iOS 18 beta (22A5307d), tap Add in ModelActor. Note that the View does not update (bug 1). Note in the XCode console that an Employee was created with a relationship to a Company. 3. Open the default.store SQLite file and observe that the created Employee does not have a Company relationship (bug 2). The relationship was not saved. 4. Tap Add in View. The same code is now executed in a Button closure. Note in the XCode console again that an Employee was created with a relationship to a Company. The View now updates showing both the previously created Employee with NIL company, and the View-created employee with the expected company. """) .font(.footnote) } .padding() Section("**Companies**") { ForEach(companies) { company in Text(company.name) } } .padding(.bottom) Section("**Employees**") { ForEach(employees) { employee in Text("Employee \(employee.name) in company \(employee.company?.name ?? "NIL")") } } Button("Add in View") { let newEmployee = Employee(company: companies.first) modelContext.insert(newEmployee) logger.notice("Created employee \(newEmployee.name) in Company \(newEmployee.company?.name ?? "NIL")") try! modelContext.save() } .buttonStyle(.bordered) Button("Add in ModelActor") { Task { await simpleModelActor.addEmployeeTo(CompanyWithID: companies.first?.persistentModelID) } } .buttonStyle(.bordered) } } .onAppear { simpleModelActor = SimpleModelActor(modelContainer: modelContext.container) if companies.isEmpty { let newCompany = Company() modelContext.insert(newCompany) try! modelContext.save() } } } }

I have a SwiftData model where I need to customize behavior based on the value of a property (connectorType). Here’s a simplified version of my model: @Model public final class ConnectorModel { public var connectorType: String ... func doSomethingDifferentForEveryConnectorType() { ... } } I’d like to implement doSomethingDifferentForEveryConnectorType in a way that allows the behavior to vary depending on connectorType, and I want to follow best practices for scalability and maintainability. I’ve come up with three potential solutions, each with pros and cons, and I’d love to hear your thoughts on which one makes the most sense or if there’s a better approach: **Option 1: Use switch Statements ** func doSomethingDifferentForEveryConnectorType() { switch connectorType { case "HTTP": // HTTP-specific logic case "WebSocket": // WebSocket-specific logic default: // Fallback logic } } Pros: Simple to implement and keeps the SwiftData model observable by SwiftUI without any additional wrapping. Cons: If more behaviors or methods are added, the code could become messy and harder to maintain. **Option 2: Use a Wrapper with Inheritance around swiftdata model ** @Observable class ParentConnector { var connectorModel: ConnectorModel init(connectorModel: ConnectorModel) { self.connectorModel = connectorModel } func doSomethingDifferentForEveryConnectorType() { fatalError("Not implemented") } } @Observable class HTTPConnector: ParentConnector { override func doSomethingDifferentForEveryConnectorType() { // HTTP-specific logic } } Pros: Logic for each connector type is cleanly organized in subclasses, making it easy to extend and maintain. Cons: Requires introducing additional observable classes, which could add unnecessary complexity. **Option 3: Use a @Transient class that customizes behavior ** protocol ConnectorProtocol { func doSomethingDifferentForEveryConnectorType(connectorModel: ConnectorModel) } class HTTPConnectorImplementation: ConnectorProtocol { func doSomethingDifferentForEveryConnectorType(connectorModel: ConnectorModel) { // HTTP-specific logic } } Then add this to the model: @Model public final class ConnectorModel { public var connectorType: String @Transient public var connectorImplementation: ConnectorProtocol? // Or alternatively from swiftui I could call myModel.connectorImplementation.doSomethingDifferentForEveryConnectorType() to avoid this wrapper func doSomethingDifferentForEveryConnectorType() { connectorImplementation?.doSomethingDifferentForEveryConnectorType(connectorModel: self) } } Pros: Decouples model logic from connector-specific behavior. Avoids creating additional observable classes and allows for easy extension. Cons: Requires explicitly passing the model to the protocol implementation, and setup for determining the correct implementation needs to be handled elsewhere. My Questions Which approach aligns best with SwiftData and SwiftUI best practices, especially for scalable and maintainable apps? Are there better alternatives that I haven’t considered? If Option 3 (protocol with dependency injection) is preferred, what’s the best way to a)manage the transient property 2) set the correct implementation and 3) pass reference to swiftdata model? Thanks in advance for your advice!

I have been trying to get this to work since it was announced a few years ago but with no joy. I'm struggling to get Apple's example code to behave itself too. Seems overly complex and buggy. So I set out to create a simplified version myself. I have got the database to sync with CloudKit and I can see my records in the developer dashboard. I'm trying to use container.record(for: object.objectID) to get the CKRecord for it, but this always fails. The next step would be to add the participant. I try to add the participant based on this code: Button { let record = fetchRecord(for: items[0]) //hack just to use the first record for dev testing let share = CKShare(rootRecord: record) let persistenceController = PersistenceController.shared persistenceController.addParticipant( emailAddress: "andrew@ambrit.com", permission: .readWrite, share: share) { share, error in if let error = error { print("Error: \(error.localizedDescription)") } else if let share = share { print("Share updated successfully: \(share)") } } } label: { Label("Participants", systemImage: "person") } and extension PersistenceController { func addParticipant(emailAddress: String, permission: CKShare.ParticipantPermission = .readWrite, share: CKShare, completionHandler: ((_ share: CKShare?, _ error: Error?) -> Void)?) { let container = PersistenceController.shared.container let lookupInfo = CKUserIdentity.LookupInfo(emailAddress: emailAddress) let persistentStore = privatePersistentStore //share.persistentStore! container.fetchParticipants(matching: [lookupInfo], into: persistentStore) { (results, error) in guard let participants = results, let participant = participants.first, error == nil else { completionHandler?(share, error) return } participant.permission = permission participant.role = .privateUser share.addParticipant(participant) container.persistUpdatedShare(share, in: persistentStore) { (share, error) in if let error = error { print("\(#function): Failed to persist updated share: \(error)") } completionHandler?(share, error) } } } } My immediate problem is that when I call fetchRecord it doesn't find anything despite the record being available in the CloudKit dashboard. func fetchRecord(for object: NSManagedObject) -> CKRecord { let container = PersistenceController.shared.container print ("Fetching record \(object.objectID)") if let record = container.record(for: object.objectID) { print("CKRecord ID: \(record.recordID)") print("Record Name: \(record.recordID.recordName)") return record } else { fatalError("Record not found") } }

I have a simple model that contains a one-to-many relationship to itself to represent a simple tree structure. It is set to cascade deletes so deleting the parent node deletes the children. Unfortunately I get an error when I try to batch delete. A test demonstrates: @Model final class TreeNode { var parent: TreeNode? @Relationship(deleteRule: .cascade, inverse: \TreeNode.parent) var children: [TreeNode] = [] init(parent: TreeNode? = nil) { self.parent = parent } } func testBatchDelete() throws { let config = ModelConfiguration(isStoredInMemoryOnly: true) let container = try ModelContainer(for: TreeNode.self, configurations: config) let context = ModelContext(container) context.autosaveEnabled = false let root = TreeNode() context.insert(root) for _ in 0..<10 { let child = TreeNode(parent: root) context.insert(child) } try context.save() // fails if first item doesn't have a nil parent, succeeds otherwise // which row is first is random, so will succeed sometimes try context.delete(model: TreeNode.self) } The error raised is: CoreData: error: Unhandled opt lock error from executeBatchDeleteRequest Constraint trigger violation: Batch delete failed due to mandatory OTO nullify inverse on TreeNode/parent and userInfo { NSExceptionOmitCallstacks = 1; NSLocalizedFailureReason = "Constraint trigger violation: Batch delete failed due to mandatory OTO nullify inverse on TreeNode/parent"; "_NSCoreDataOptimisticLockingFailureConflictsKey" = ( ); } Interestingly, if the first record when doing an unsorted query happens to be the parent node, it works correctly, so the above unit test will actually work sometimes. Now, this can be "solved" by changing the reverse relationship to an optional like so: @Relationship(deleteRule: .cascade, inverse: \TreeNode.parent) var children: [TreeNode]? The above delete will work fine. However, this causes issues with predicates that test counts in children, like for instance deleting only nodes where children is empty for example: try context.delete(model: TreeNode.self, where: #Predicate { $0.children?.isEmpty ?? true }) It ends up crashing and dumps a stacktrace to the console with: An uncaught exception was raised Keypath containing KVC aggregate where there shouldn't be one; failed to handle children.@count (the stacktrace is quite long and deep in CoreData's NSSQLGenerator) Does anyone know how to work around this?

I have encountered an issue with a customer’s data access after they migrated to a different iCloud account, and I’m looking for guidance. The Situation: The customer was logged into their account on my app, which was associated with a specific iCloud account (iCloud A). They had all their app data available while using iCloud A. The customer then switched to a new iCloud account (iCloud B) on the same device, while still using the same app account. After switching iCloud accounts, their data is no longer visible in the app or my CloudKit dashboard. My Investigation: I accessed the customer’s CloudKit data via the CloudKit Console, acting as their iCloud account. I couldn’t find the private database zone or any of their records when accessing iCloud A through the console. I don’t believe the data was deleted since actions performed under iCloud B shouldn’t affect data stored in iCloud A. My Hypothesis: I suspect that the customer’s old iCloud account (iCloud A) may have downgraded or stopped paying for iCloud storage. If the iCloud subscription is inactive or expired, could that prevent me from accessing their CloudKit data? Would renewing the iCloud subscription for iCloud A restore access to the missing data? Questions: Does an unpaid or expired iCloud account restrict access to CloudKit records, even if they weren’t deleted? Would paying for iCloud storage again restore the data previously stored in CloudKit? Is there any way to recover the customer’s CloudKit data if they are unable to access their old iCloud account? If anyone has a simpler approach to recovering the customer’s iCloud-stored app data or has experience dealing with iCloud migrations like this, I’d appreciate your insights. Thank you in advance for any advice!