I have this actor actor ConcurrentDatabase: ModelActor { nonisolated let modelExecutor: any ModelExecutor nonisolated let modelContainer: ModelContainer init(modelContainer: ModelContainer) { self.modelExecutor = DefaultSerialModelExecutor(modelContext: ModelContext(modelContainer)) self.modelContainer = modelContainer } /// Save pending changes in the model context. private func save() { if self.modelContext.hasChanges { do { try self.modelContext.save() } catch { ... } } } } I am getting a runtime crash on: try self.modelContext.save() when trying to insert something into the database and save Thread 1: Fatal error: Incorrect actor executor assumption; Expected same executor as MainActor. Can anyone explain why this is happening?

Use CloudKit's ckqueryoperation's recordmatchedblock in Swift 6.0, which always crashes, but works fine in Swift 5: func fetchAllRecords() async throws { let predicate = NSPredicate(format: "Topics = %@", "Integrations") let query = CKQuery(recordType: "PureMList", predicate: predicate) let operation = CKQueryOperation(query: query) operation.recordMatchedBlock = { recordID, result in switch result { case .success(let record): DispatchQueue.main.async { // Ensure UI updates happen here print("Fetched record: \(record)") // Update your UI elements here } case .failure(let error): // Handle the error print("Error fetching record with ID \(recordID): \(error)") } } // Ensure you're using the correct database publicDatabase.add(operation) }

I get the following fatal error when the user clicks Save in AddProductionView. Fatal error: Duplicate keys of type 'AnyHashable' were found in a Dictionary. This usually means either that the type violates Hashable's requirements, or that members of such a dictionary were mutated after insertion. As far as I’m aware, SwiftData automatically makes its models conform to Hashable, so this shouldn’t be a problem. I think it has something to do with the picker, but for the life of me I can’t see what. This error occurs about 75% of the time when Save is clicked. I'm using Xcode 16.2 and iPhone SE 2nd Gen. Any help would be greatly appreciated… Here is my code: import SwiftUI import SwiftData @main struct MyApp: App { var body: some Scene { WindowGroup { ContentView() .modelContainer(for: Character.self, isAutosaveEnabled: false) } } } @Model final class Character { var name: String var production: Production var myCharacter: Bool init(name: String, production: Production, myCharacter: Bool = false) { self.name = name self.production = production self.myCharacter = myCharacter } } @Model final class Production { var name: String init(name: String) { self.name = name } } struct ContentView: View { @State private var showingSheet = false var body: some View { Button("Add", systemImage: "plus") { showingSheet.toggle() } .sheet(isPresented: $showingSheet) { AddProductionView() } } } struct AddProductionView: View { @Environment(\.dismiss) private var dismiss @Environment(\.modelContext) var modelContext @State var production = Production(name: "") @Query var characters: [Character] @State private var characterName: String = "" @State private var selectedCharacter: Character? var filteredCharacters: [Character] { characters.filter { $0.production == production } } var body: some View { NavigationStack { Form { Section("Details") { TextField("Title", text: $production.name) } Section("Characters") { List(filteredCharacters) { character in Text(character.name) } HStack { TextField("Character", text: $characterName) Button("Add") { let newCharacter = Character(name: characterName, production: production) modelContext.insert(newCharacter) characterName = "" } .disabled(characterName.isEmpty) } if !filteredCharacters.isEmpty { Picker("Select your role", selection: $selectedCharacter) { Text("Select") .tag(nil as Character?) ForEach(filteredCharacters) { character in Text(character.name) .tag(character as Character?) } } .pickerStyle(.menu) } } } .toolbar { Button("Save") { //Fatal error: Duplicate keys of type 'AnyHashable' were found in a Dictionary. This usually means either that the type violates Hashable's requirements, or that members of such a dictionary were mutated after insertion. if let selectedCharacter = selectedCharacter { selectedCharacter.myCharacter = true } modelContext.insert(production) do { try modelContext.save() } catch { print("Failed to save context: \(error)") } dismiss() } .disabled(production.name.isEmpty || selectedCharacter == nil) } } } }

I have an app that uses Member as a @Model Class name. When I installed Xcode 16, Member was not allowed and failed in the Build, so I had to rename the class. If I pass this patch to the app store, my users will lose data. Do you have any suggestions?

Hi, I am creating (or trying to) my first app using SwiftData - and I have questions :-) The main question I can't get my head wrapped around is the following: Let's say I have the sample below... @Model class Person { @Relationship(inverse:\Hat.owner) var hat:Hat } @Model class Hat { var owner:Person? } It looks like I am creating a strong reference cycle between the person and the hat objects? And in fact I am seeing these kinds of reference cycles when I look at the memory debugger. Many code samples I have seen so far use this type of relationship declaration... And I am wondering: Am I missing something? Admittedly I don't find many discussions about memory leaks caused by SwiftData despite the syntax being used in many examples? So what is the situation? Did Apple just miss to explain that the inverse: declaration causes memory leaks or is there some kind of magic that I should understand?

After updating to 15.2 I am seeing frequent crashes in my in-development app related to SwiftData. For instance, I have a 100% reproducible crash when I make the app lose and regain focus. There is also a crash that seem to be triggered by a modelContext.save() call in one of my ModelActors. With both of these crashes, the issue seems to be around keeping SwiftData models up to date. The first item in the stacktrace that is not machinecode is always some getter on a SwiftData collection or object. In the console, these crashes are accompanied by output along the lines of: === AttributeGraph: cycle detected through attribute 820680 === precondition failure: setting value during update: 930592 error: the replacement path doesn't exist: "/var/folders/b7/0dw7ztp13fgfxlj19by851tw0000gn/T/swift-generated-sources/@__swiftmacro_10SpaceDebug8TodoListV5todos33_5575DE008494C519BB9FA49C405133E1LL5QueryfMa_.swift" error: the replacement path doesn't exist: "/var/folders/b7/0dw7ztp13fgfxlj19by851tw0000gn/T/swift-generated-sources/@__swiftmacro_10SpaceDebug8TodoListV5todos33_5575DE008494C519BB9FA49C405133E1LL5QueryfMa_.swift" Can't show file for stack frame : <DBGLLDBStackFrame: 0x35a57c4e0> - stackNumber:27 - name:TodoList.todos.getter. The file path does not exist on the file system: /var/folders/b7/0dw7ztp13fgfxlj19by851tw0000gn/T/swift-generated-sources/@__swiftmacro_10SpaceDebug8TodoListV5todos33_5575DE008494C519BB9FA49C405133E1LL5QueryfMa_.swiftCan't show file for stack frame : <DBGLLDBStackFrame: 0x35a57c4e0> - stackNumber:27 - name:TodoList.todos.getter. The file path does not exist on the file system: /var/folders/b7/0dw7ztp13fgfxlj19by851tw0000gn/T/swift-generated-sources/@__swiftmacro_10SpaceDebug8TodoListV5todos33_5575DE008494C519BB9FA49C405133E1LL5QueryfMa_.swiftCan't show file for stack frame : <DBGLLDBStackFrame: 0x35a5a82f0> - stackNumber:62 - name:TodoList.todos.getter. The file path does not exist on the file system: /var/folders/b7/0dw7ztp13fgfxlj19by851tw0000gn/T/swift-generated-sources/@__swiftmacro_10SpaceDebug8TodoListV5todos33_5575DE008494C519BB9FA49C405133E1LL5QueryfMa_.swift Has anyone run into something similar? I'm looking for suggestions on how to debug this. Cheers, Bastiaan

I am trying to add a custom JSON DataStore and DataStoreConfiguration for SwiftData. Apple kindly provided some sample code in the WWDC24 session, "Create a custom data store with SwiftData", and (once updated for API changes since WWDC) that works fine. However, when I try to add a relationship between two classes, it fails. Has anyone successfully made a JSONDataStore with a relationship? Here's my code; firstly the cleaned up code from the WWDC session: import SwiftData final class JSONStoreConfiguration: DataStoreConfiguration { typealias Store = JSONStore var name: String var schema: Schema? var fileURL: URL init(name: String, schema: Schema? = nil, fileURL: URL) { self.name = name self.schema = schema self.fileURL = fileURL } static func == (lhs: JSONStoreConfiguration, rhs: JSONStoreConfiguration) -> Bool { return lhs.name == rhs.name } func hash(into hasher: inout Hasher) { hasher.combine(name) } } final class JSONStore: DataStore { typealias Configuration = JSONStoreConfiguration typealias Snapshot = DefaultSnapshot var configuration: JSONStoreConfiguration var name: String var schema: Schema var identifier: String init(_ configuration: JSONStoreConfiguration, migrationPlan: (any SchemaMigrationPlan.Type)?) throws { self.configuration = configuration self.name = configuration.name self.schema = configuration.schema! self.identifier = configuration.fileURL.lastPathComponent } func save(_ request: DataStoreSaveChangesRequest<DefaultSnapshot>) throws -> DataStoreSaveChangesResult<DefaultSnapshot> { var remappedIdentifiers = [PersistentIdentifier: PersistentIdentifier]() var serializedData = try read() for snapshot in request.inserted { let permanentIdentifier = try PersistentIdentifier.identifier(for: identifier, entityName: snapshot.persistentIdentifier.entityName, primaryKey: UUID()) let permanentSnapshot = snapshot.copy(persistentIdentifier: permanentIdentifier) serializedData[permanentIdentifier] = permanentSnapshot remappedIdentifiers[snapshot.persistentIdentifier] = permanentIdentifier } for snapshot in request.updated { serializedData[snapshot.persistentIdentifier] = snapshot } for snapshot in request.deleted { serializedData[snapshot.persistentIdentifier] = nil } try write(serializedData) return DataStoreSaveChangesResult<DefaultSnapshot>(for: self.identifier, remappedIdentifiers: remappedIdentifiers) } func fetch<T>(_ request: DataStoreFetchRequest<T>) throws -> DataStoreFetchResult<T, DefaultSnapshot> where T : PersistentModel { if request.descriptor.predicate != nil { throw DataStoreError.preferInMemoryFilter } else if request.descriptor.sortBy.count > 0 { throw DataStoreError.preferInMemorySort } let objs = try read() let snapshots = objs.values.map({ $0 }) return DataStoreFetchResult(descriptor: request.descriptor, fetchedSnapshots: snapshots, relatedSnapshots: objs) } func read() throws -> [PersistentIdentifier : DefaultSnapshot] { if FileManager.default.fileExists(atPath: configuration.fileURL.path(percentEncoded: false)) { let decoder = JSONDecoder() decoder.dateDecodingStrategy = .iso8601 let data = try decoder.decode([DefaultSnapshot].self, from: try Data(contentsOf: configuration.fileURL)) var result = [PersistentIdentifier: DefaultSnapshot]() data.forEach { s in result[s.persistentIdentifier] = s } return result } else { return [:] } } func write(_ data: [PersistentIdentifier : DefaultSnapshot]) throws { let encoder = JSONEncoder() encoder.dateEncodingStrategy = .iso8601 encoder.outputFormatting = [.prettyPrinted, .sortedKeys] let jsonData = try encoder.encode(data.values.map({ $0 })) try jsonData.write(to: configuration.fileURL) } } The data model classes: import SwiftData @Model class Settings { private(set) var version = 1 @Relationship(deleteRule: .cascade) var hack: Hack? = Hack() init() { } } @Model class Hack { var foo = "Foo" var bar = 42 init() { } } Container: lazy var mainContainer: ModelContainer = { do { let url = // URL to file let configuration = JSONStoreConfiguration(name: "Settings", schema: Schema([Settings.self, Hack.self]), fileURL: url) return try ModelContainer(for: Settings.self, Hack.self, configurations: configuration) } catch { fatalError("Container error: \(error.localizedDescription)") } }() Load function, that saves a new Settings JSON file if there isn't an existing one: @MainActor func loadSettings() { let mainContext = mainContainer.mainContext let descriptor = FetchDescriptor<Settings>() let settingsArray = try? mainContext.fetch(descriptor) print("\(settingsArray?.count ?? 0) settings found") if let settingsArray, let settings = settingsArray.last { print("Loaded") } else { let settings = Settings() mainContext.insert(settings) do { try mainContext.save() } catch { print("Error saving settings: \(error)") } } } The save operation creates a JSON file, which while it isn't a format I would choose, is acceptable, though I notice that the "hack" property (the relationship) doesn't have the correct identifier. When I run the app again to load the data, I get an error (that there wasn't room to include in this post). Even if I change Apple's code to not assign a new identifier, so the relationship property and its pointee have the same identifier, it still doesn't load. Am I doing something obviously wrong, or are relationships not supported in custom data stores?

It takes a few seconds, sometimes a few minutes for records to be downloaded back from CloudKit when the user reinstalls the app, which leads users to thinking their data was lost. I would like to know if there’s any way to provide a visual feedback about the current CloudKit sync status so I can let users know their data is being in fact downloaded back to their devices.

I have a @Model class that is comprised of a String and a custom Enum. It was working until I added raw String values for the enum cases, and afterwards this error and code displays when opening a view that uses the class: { @storageRestrictions(accesses: _$backingData, initializes: _type) init(initialValue) { _$backingData.setValue(forKey: \.type, to: initialValue) _type = _SwiftDataNoType() } get { _$observationRegistrar.access(self, keyPath: \.type) return self.getValue(forKey: \.type) } set { _$observationRegistrar.withMutation(of: self, keyPath: \.type) { self.setValue(forKey: \.type, to: newValue) } } } Thread 1: EXC_BREAKPOINT (code=1, subcode=0x1cc165d0c) I removed the String raw values but the error persists. Any guidance would be greatly appreciated. Below is replicated code: @Model class CopingSkillEntry { var stringText: String var case: CaseType init(stringText: String, case: CaseType) { self.stringText = stringText self.case = case } } enum CaseType: Codable, Hashable { case case1 case case1 case case3 }

I want to get to a point where I can use a small view with a query for my SwiftData model like this: @Query private var currentTrainingCycle: [TrainingCycle] init(/*currentDate: Date*/) { _currentTrainingCycle = Query(filter: #Predicate<TrainingCycle> { $0.numberOfDays > 0 // $0.startDate < currentDate && currentDate < $0.endDate }, sort: \.startDate) } The commented code is where I want to go. In this instance, it'd be created as a lazy var in a viewModel to have it stable (and not constantly re-creating the view). Since it was not working, I thought I could check the same view with a query that does not require any dynamic input. In this case, the numberOfDays never changes after instantiation. But still, each time the app tries to create this view, the app becomes unresponsive, the CPU usage goes at 196%, memory goes way high and the device heats up quickly. Am I holding it wrong? How can I have a dynamic predicate on a View in SwiftUI with SwiftData?

My App requires access to iCloud. I used to be able to get the User's name components (family+given name) using: let dummyZone = CKRecordZone (zoneName: UUID().uuidString) let dummyShare = CKShare (recordZoneID: dummyZone.zoneID) Persistence.logger.notice ("\(#function): Dummy Zone: \(dummyZone.zoneID.zoneName)") // Save the dummyZone and then the dummyShare (for/in the dummyZone) let _ = try await container.privateCloudDatabase.save (dummyZone) let _ = try await container.privateCloudDatabase.save (dummyShare) // Extract the dummyShare's owner's identity - which is 'us/me' let userIdentity = dummyShare.owner.userIdentity where the resulting userIdentity had a filled out nameComponents. Now, recently, it seems to be empty. Did something change in the interfaces? I've also tried, more directly: let userRecordID = try await container.userRecordID() let userParticipant = try await container.shareParticipant(forUserRecordID: userRecordID) let userIdentity = userParticipant.userIdentity and still nameComponents is empty. Given that my App requires iCloud, is there a way to get (familyName,givenName)?

Using SwiftData and this is the simplest example I could boil down: @Model final class Item { var timestamp: Date var tag: Tag? init(timestamp: Date) { self.timestamp = timestamp } } @Model final class Tag { var timestamp: Date init(timestamp: Date) { self.timestamp = timestamp } } Notice Tag has no reference to Item. So if I create a bunch of items and set their Tag. Later on I add the ability to delete a Tag. Since I haven't added inverse relationship Item now references a tag that no longer exists so so I get these types of errors: SwiftData/BackingData.swift:875: Fatal error: This model instance was invalidated because its backing data could no longer be found the store. PersistentIdentifier(id: SwiftData.PersistentIdentifier.ID(url: x-coredata://EEC1D410-F87E-4F1F-B82D-8F2153A0B23C/Tag/p1), implementation: SwiftData.PersistentIdentifierImplementation) I think I understand now that I just need to add the item reference to Tag and SwiftData will nullify all Item references to that tag when a Tag is deleted. But, the damage is already done. How can I iterate through all Items that referenced a deleted tag and set them to nil or to a placeholder Tag? Or how can I catch that error and fix it when it comes up? The crash doesn't occur when loading an Item, only when accessing item.tag?.timestamp, in fact, item.tag?.id is still ok and doesn't crash since it doesn't have to load the backing data. I've tried things like just looping through all items and setting tag to nil, but saving the model context fails because somewhere in there it still tries to validate the old value. Thanks!

I'm considering using CloudKit in my app (it doesn't use Core Data) and have read as many materials as I can find. I haven't fully grasped it yet and have a basic question on CKRecord.Reference. Does CloudKit guarantee CKRecord.Reference value is always valid? By valid I mean the target CkRecord pointed by the CKRecord.Reference exists in the database. Let's consider an example. Suppose there are two tables: Account and Transaction: Account Table: AccountNumber Currency Rate ------------- -------- ---- a1 USD 0.03 Transaction Table: TransactionNumber AccountNumber Amount ----------------- ------------- ------ t1 a1 20 Now suppose user does the following: User first deletes account a1 and its associated transactions t1 on device A. The device saves the change to cloud. Then user adds a new transaction t2 to account a1 on device B, before the device receives the change made in step 1 from cloud. Since a1 hasn't been deleted on device B, the operation should succeed locally. The device tries to save the change to cloud too. My questions: Q1) Will device B be able to save the change in step 2 to cloud? I hope it would fail, because otherwise it would lead to inconsistent data. But I find the following in CKModifyRecordsOperation doc (emphasis mine), which implies CloudKit allows invalid reference: During a save operation, CloudKit requires that the target record of the parent reference, if set, exists in the database or is part of the same operation; all other reference fields are exempt from this requirement. (BTW, I think the fact that, when using CloudKit, Core Data requires all relations must be optional also indicates that CloudKit can't guarantee relation is always valid, though I think that is mainly an issue on client side caused by data transfer size. The above example, however, is different in that it's an issue on cloud side - the data on cloud is inconsistent). I also find the following in the document. However, I don't think it helps in the above example, because IIUC CloudKit can only detect conflict when the changes on the same record but the changes in step 1 and step 2 are on different records. Because records can change between the time you fetch them and the time you save them, the save policy determines whether new changes overwrite existing changes. By default, the operation reports an error when there’s a newer version on the server. If the above understanding is correct, however, I don't understand why the same document has the following requirement, which implies CloudKit doesn't allow invalid reference: When creating two new records that have a reference between them, use the same operation to save both records at the same time. Q2) Suppose CloudKit allows invalid reference on cloud side (that is, device B successfully saves the change in step 2 to cloud) , I wonder what's the best practice to deal with it? I think the issue is different from the optional relation requirement in Core Data when using CloudKit, because in that case the data is consistent on cloud side and eventually the client will receive complete data. In the above example, however, the data on cloud is inconsistent so the client has to remedy it somehow (although client has little information helping it). One approach I think of is to avoid the issue in the first place. My idea is to maintain a counter in the database and requires client to increase the counter (it's not Lamport clock. BTW, is it possible to use Lamport clock in this case?) when making any change. This should help CloudKit to detect conflict (though I can't think out a good strategy on how client should deal with it. A simple one is perhaps to prompt user to select one copy). However, this approach effectively uses cloud as a centralized server, which I suspect isn't the typical way how people use CloudKit, and it requires clients to maintain local counter value in various situations. I wonder what's the typical approach? Am I missing something? Thanks for any help.

When attempting to deploy schema changes in the iCloudKit Database by clicking the Deploy Schema Changes button, a Confirm Deployment dialog appears, showing an error: “Internal error”. The following error details were observed in the JavaScript console: • description: “The request has failed due to an error.” • headers: undefined • message: “Known response error: The request has failed due to an error.” • result: • code: 400 • detailedMessage: undefined • message: “bad-request” • reason: “Internal error” • redirectUrl: undefined • requestUuid: “0c5b4af2-15c9-425f-87ea-************” • retryAfterSeconds: undefined

I'm using NSPersistentCloudKitContainer and in the CloudKit dashboards I have added indexes for all my records modifiedTimestamp queryable, modifiedTimestamp sortable and recordName queryable. But I'm still getting this warning message in the console. <CKError 0x302acf0c0: "Invalid Arguments" (12/2015); server message = "Field 'recordName' is not marked queryable"; op = FF68EFF8D501AED8; uuid = 12C5C84B-EA9B-41A6-AD85-34023827E6FA; container ID = "z.y.x"> error: CoreData+CloudKit: -[NSCloudKitMirroringDelegate _importFinishedWithResult:importer:](1400): <PFCloudKitImporter: 0x30316c1c0>: Import failed with error: <CKError 0x302acf0c0: "Invalid Arguments" (12/2015); server message = "Field 'recordName' is not marked queryable"; op = FF68EFF8D501AED8; uuid = 12C5C84B-EA9B-41A6-AD85-34023827E6FA; container ID = "z.y.x"> error: CoreData+CloudKit: -[NSCloudKitMirroringDelegate recoverFromError:](2312): <NSCloudKitMirroringDelegate: 0x301b1cd20> - Attempting recovery from error: <CKError 0x302acf0c0: "Invalid Arguments" (12/2015); server message = "Field 'recordName' is not marked queryable"; op = FF68EFF8D501AED8; uuid = 12C5C84B-EA9B-41A6-AD85-34023827E6FA; container ID = "z.y.x"> error: CoreData+CloudKit: -[NSCloudKitMirroringDelegate _recoverFromError:withZoneIDs:forStore:inMonitor:](2622): <NSCloudKitMirroringDelegate: 0x301b1cd20> - Failed to recover from error: CKErrorDomain:12 Recovery encountered the following error: (null):0 error: CoreData+CloudKit: -[NSCloudKitMirroringDelegate resetAfterError:andKeepContainer:](612): <NSCloudKitMirroringDelegate: 0x301b1cd20> - resetting internal state after error: <CKError 0x302acf0c0: "Invalid Arguments" (12/2015); server message = "Field 'recordName' is not marked queryable"; op = FF68EFF8D501AED8; uuid = 12C5C84B-EA9B-41A6-AD85-34023827E6FA; container ID = "z.y.x"> error: CoreData+CloudKit: -[NSCloudKitMirroringDelegate _requestAbortedNotInitialized:](2200): <NSCloudKitMirroringDelegate: 0x301b1cd20> - Never successfully initialized and cannot execute request '<NSCloudKitMirroringImportRequest: 0x300738eb0> A3F23AAC-F820-4044-B4B9-28DFAC4DE8D7' due to error: <CKError 0x302acf0c0: "Invalid Arguments" (12/2015); server message = "Field 'recordName' is not marked queryable"; op = FF68EFF8D501AED8; uuid = 12C5C84B-EA9B-41A6-AD85-34023827E6FA; container ID = "z.y.x">

Hello everyone, I'm working on an iOS app that uses CloudKit for data synchronization. I'm encountering an issue where my app can't find the "JournalPrompt" record type in the public database. Here's the relevant code and error messages (I'm using placeholders like [APP_NAME] or [CONTAINER_IDENTIFIER]): private func fetchPromptsFromiCloud() { let container = CKContainer(identifier: "[CONTAINER_IDENTIFIER]") let publicDatabase = container.publicCloudDatabase // Create a predicate to query for the specific record let predicate = NSPredicate(format: "recordID.recordName == %@", "B6663053-FC2E-4645-938B-9FA528D59663") let query = CKQuery(recordType: "JournalPrompt", predicate: predicate) publicDatabase.perform(query, inZoneWith: nil) { [weak self] (records, error) in if let error = error as? CKError { if error.code == .unknownItem { print("JournalPrompt record type does not exist or the specific record was not found in the public database.") } else { print("Error fetching record from iCloud public database: \(error)") } return } guard let record = records?.first else { print("No record found with the specified ID in the public database.") return } print("Found record in public database:") print("Record ID: \(record.recordID.recordName)") print("Text: \(record["text"] as? String ?? "No text")") print("Creation Date: \(record.creationDate ?? Date())") print("Used Count: \(record["usedCount"] as? Int ?? 0)") print("Is Default: \(record["isDefault"] as? Bool ?? false)") } } Error When I run this code, I get the following error: Error fetching record from iCloud public database: <CKError 0x600000c072a0: "Invalid Arguments" (12/1009); "Invalid predicate: recordKey (recordID.recordName) contains invalid characters"> I've also implemented a function to check the CloudKit schema: func checkCloudKitSchema() { checkDatabase(scope: .private) checkDatabase(scope: .public) } private func checkDatabase(scope: CKDatabase.Scope) { let container = CKContainer(identifier: "[CONTAINER_IDENTIFIER]") let database = scope == .private ? container.privateCloudDatabase : container.publicCloudDatabase print("Checking \(scope == .private ? "private" : "public") database") database.fetchAllRecordZones { (zones, error) in if let error = error { print("Error fetching record zones: \(error)") return } print("Available record zones in \(scope == .private ? "private" : "public") database:") zones?.forEach { zone in print("- \(zone.zoneID.zoneName)") } let query = CKQuery(recordType: "JournalPrompt", predicate: NSPredicate(value: true)) database.perform(query, inZoneWith: nil) { (records, error) in if let error = error as? CKError, error.code == .unknownItem { print("JournalPrompt record type does not exist in the \(scope == .private ? "private" : "public") database.") } else if let error = error { print("Error fetching records from \(scope == .private ? "private" : "public") database: \(error)") } else if let records = records, !records.isEmpty { print("JournalPrompt record type exists in the \(scope == .private ? "private" : "public") database.") print("Fetched \(records.count) JournalPrompt records:") for record in records { print("Record ID: \(record.recordID.recordName)") print("Fields:") record.allKeys().forEach { key in print(" - \(key): \(type(of: record[key]))") } print("---") } } else { print("JournalPrompt record type exists in the \(scope == .private ? "private" : "public") database, but no records found.") } } } } When I run this, I get: Checking public database Available record zones in public database: _defaultZone JournalPrompt record type does not exist in the public database. CloudKit Database Setup I've set up my CloudKit Database as follows: And my data model is as follows: Despite this setup, my app can't seem to find or interact with the JournalPrompt record type. I've double-checked that my app's identifier matches the one in the CloudKit dashboard, and I've verified that the record type name is spelled correctly. Questions: Why might my app be unable to find the JournalPrompt record type, even though it's defined in the CloudKit dashboard? Is there anything wrong with my query or error handling that could be causing this issue? Are there any common pitfalls or setup steps I might have missed when integrating CloudKit? Any insights or suggestions would be greatly appreciated. I really appreciate any help you can provide.

One question I often see on DevForums and in my day DTS job is if a Core Data object managed by NSPersistentCloudKitContainer can be shared with other iCloud users. The answer is yes but you need to do it using CloudKit API directly because NSPersistentCloudKitContainer doesn’t support CloudKit shared database (CKContainer.sharedCloudDatabase) today. Assuming you have a Core Data object, let’s say a document, that you’d like to collaborate with your colleagues: You are the document owner and can use NSPersistentCloudKitContainer to fully manages the document and synchronize it across your devices. You can grab a CloudKit record associated with your document from NSPersistentCloudKitContainer using record(for:) or recordID(for:), and share it to your colleagues using UICloudSharingController. See our Sharing CloudKit Data with Other iCloud Users - https://developer.apple.com/documentation/cloudkit/sharing_cloudkit_data_with_other_icloud_users sample for how to share a CloudKit record. After accepting the sharing, your colleague, as a participant, can view or edit the shared document. The document resides in the participant’s CloudKit shared database and you have to manage it with your own code. When your colleague edits and saves the shared document, the changes go to the owner’s private database, and eventually synchronize to NSPersistentCloudKitContainer on the owner side.  As you can see, you need to implement #2 and #3 with your own code because NSPersistentCloudKitContainer can’t manage the data in the participant's shared database. If you have any difficulty after going through the above sample code, you can contact Apple’s DTS for help.

My use case is the following: Every user of my app can create as an owner a set of items.  These items are private until the owner invites other users to share all of them as participant. The participants can modify the shared items and/or add other items. So, sharing is not done related to individual items, but to all items of an owner. I want to use CoreData & CloudKit to have local copies of private and shared items. To my understanding, CoreData & CloudKit puts all mirrored items in a special zone „com.apple.coredata.cloudkit.zone“. So, this zone should be shared, i.e. all items in it. In the video it is said that NSPersistentCloudKitContainer uses Record Zone Sharing optionally in contrast to hierarchically record sharing using a root record. But how is this done? Maybe I can declare zone „com.apple.coredata.cloudkit.zone“ as a shared zone?

I am working on a software where we want to add the feature to share the whole database with the other user. Database is iCloud combined with coredata. The other user(s) should be able to edit /delete and even create new objects in the share. I did this with this code witch directly from sample code let participants = try await ckConainer.fetchParticipants(matching: [lookupInfo], into: selectedStore) for participant in participants { participant.permission = .readWrite participant.role = .privateUser share.addParticipant(participant) } try await ckConainer.persistUpdatedShare(share, in: selectedStore) the other user gets invited and I can see this in iCloud database that the other user is invited with status invited. but the other user never gets a mail or something to accept and join the share. How does the other needs to accept the invitation ?

I am attempting to migrate a cloudkit module that calls on manual cloudkit methods for fetching record zone changes, modifying records, etc to one that utilizes CKSyncEngine. I've got a basic implementation working with just a create method for one of my data models, however it seems like the sync engine keeps calling sync events on the same pending changes. Here is my current flow: The user will hit some button that lets them fill out a form to create a data model. The user saves the form. This triggers a method that takes the resulting data model and queues it to the sync engine's state (engine.state.add(pendingRecordZoneChanges: pendingChanges) I have my delegate method nextRecordZoneChangeBatch(_ context:...) implemented where it fetches the corresponding data model using the record ID and returns a batch containing the corresponding populated record from the data model. I have the handleEvent(_ event:...) delegate method implemented where I handle both .fetchRecordZoneChanges and .sentRecordZoneChanges. I have set up .sentRecordZoneChanges to merge the server record into my local record (and persisted locally) so that the record change tags are the same. After this last portion, it seems that the sync engine continues to keep pushing syncs/updates and I end up with numerous handleEvent(_ event:) calls that keep returning savedRecords (and occasionally failedRecordSaves). Am I missing some step to remove the record from the changes after the sync engine recognizes that I have properly saved the record to the server?