Hello everyone, why should our account with a binary file that is public and all developers can use it be closed according to the 4.3 guideline? But Planet VPN which has more than 11 apps and many other developers can easily use it and there are no problems, be closed? Are these rules only for our company with more than 20+ employees? That our years of effort can end in one day with the decision of an inspector who only checks a system message? Maybe you can check the links: https://apps.apple.com/ae/app/japan-vpn-secure-proxy/id6499425450
https://apps.apple.com/ae/app/vpn-canada-fast-private/id6499426249
https://apps.apple.com/ae/app/vpn-turkey-fast-and-private/id6499426037
https://apps.apple.com/ae/app/vpn-india-private-secure/id6477943653
And you have access to more than 7 other apps and you can see the developer page, blocking an account because of a legal line is not right! According to Apple's fraud or abuse or circumvention rules, this could include account banning, but we can prove with evidence that the reason for marking binary similarity with other developers is simply a public branch that all developers can use on GitHub.
Is there really anyone who monitors that the review team does not make dictatorial decisions?
If they do not review for more than a month or continue to refuse to accept the developer's application for approval despite explanations and documentation, they have not made a mistake.
But if the developers do not change the structure of a public library that is not necessary to build at all due to the similarity of the work, like OpenVPN at its core, they are linking you to other developers who have violated the rules!!!
I agree with you, a reviewer whose literacy is at the level of a primary school child.
https://github.com/XTLS/Xray-core Many developers may use this core and break the rules. There is no reason why your system should automatically attribute it. You can also impose the same due to the inconvenience and harassment of other developers. You can decide with your own eyes and mind.
I wrote this so that maybe a good and responsible person can solve it. Respect to the review team and their senior managers.
Regards