I often struggle to see my own log data with the heavy stream of CloudKit updates. Is there an easy way to filter that our or turn it on/off?

I've spent a few months writing an app that uses SwiftData with inheritance. Everything worked well until I tried adding CloudKit support. To do so, I had to make all relationships optional, which exposed what appears to be a bug. Note that this isn't a CloudKit issue -- it happens even when CloudKit is disabled -- but it's due to the requirement for optional relationships. In the code below, I get the following error on the second call to modelContext.save() when the button is clicked: Could not cast value of type 'SwiftData.PersistentIdentifier' (0x1ef510b68) to 'SimplePersistenceIdentifierTest.Computer' (0x1025884e0). I was surprised to find zero hit when Googling "Could not cast value of type 'SwiftData.PersistentIdentifier'". Some things to note: Calling teacher.computers?.append(computer) instead of computer.teacher = teacher results in the same error. It only happens when Teacher inherits Person. It only happens if modelContext.save() is called both times. It works if the first modelContext.save() is commented out. If the second modelContext.save()is commented out, the error occurs the second time the model context is saved (whether explicitly or implicitly). Keep in mind this is a super simple repro written to generate on demand the error I'm seeing in a normal app. In my app, modelContext.save() must be called in some places to update the UI immediately, sometimes resulting in the error seconds later when the model context is saved automatically. Not calling modelContext.save() doesn't appear to be an option. To be sure, I'm new to this ecosystem so I'd be thrilled if I've missed something obvious! Any thoughts are appreciated. import Foundation import SwiftData import SwiftUI struct ContentView: View { @Environment(\.modelContext) var modelContext var body: some View { VStack { Button("Do it") { let teacher = Teacher() let computer = Computer() modelContext.insert(teacher) modelContext.insert(computer) try! modelContext.save() computer.teacher = teacher try! modelContext.save() } } } } @Model class Computer { @Relationship(deleteRule: .nullify) var teacher: Teacher? init() {} } @Model class Person { init() {} } @available(iOS 26.0, macOS 26.0, *) @Model class Teacher: Person { @Relationship(deleteRule: .nullify, inverse: \Computer.teacher) public var computers: [Computer]? = [] override init() { super.init() } }

Hi there, as far as I know CloudKit sharing is only available when using Core Kit coding instead swift. Are you okaying to open that posibility in further versions of swift?

Hi, Overview I have a SwiftData project which automatically syncs with CloudKit. When I run the app, I see the following error in Xcode logs. Error updating background task request: Error Domain=BGSystemTaskSchedulerErrorDomain Code=3 "(null)" My attempt I can enable Background processing (under Signing & Capabilities > Background modes), but I don't know the BGTaskSchedulerPermittedIdentifiers to add in the Info.plist Questions How can I resolve this? If I should enable background processing, what are the BGTaskSchedulerPermittedIdentifiers to add in Info.plist?

Hi, I’m working on a macOS app that includes a file browser component. And I’m trying to match Finder’s behavior for color tags and folder icons. For local files/folders everything works fine: Tag color key returns the expected label number via NSColor * labelColor = nil; [fileURL getResourceValue:&labelColor forKey:NSURLLabelColorKey error:nil]; NSNumber * labelKey = nil; [fileURL getResourceValue:&labelKey forKey:NSURLLabelNumberKey error:nil]; QLThumbnailGenerator obtains the expected colored folder icon (including emoji/symbol overlay if set) via QLThumbnailGenerationRequest * request = [[QLThumbnailGenerationRequest alloc] initWithFileAtURL:fileURL size:iconSize scale:scaleFactor representationTypes:QLThumbnailGenerationRequestRepresentationTypeIcon]; request.iconMode = YES; [[QLThumbnailGenerator sharedGenerator] generateBestRepresentationForRequest:request completionHandler:^(QLThumbnailRepresentation * _Nullable thumbnail, NSError * _Nullable error) { if (thumbnail != nil && error == nil) { NSImage * thumbnailImage = [thumbnail NSImage]; // ... } }]; However, for items on iCloud Drive (whether currently downloaded locally or only stored in the cloud), the same code always produces gray colors, while Finder shows everything correctly: NSURLLabelNumberKey always returns 1 (gray) for items with color tags, and 0 for non-tagged. Folder icons returned via QLThumbnailGenerator are gray, no emoji/symbol overlays. Reading tag data from xattr gives values like “Green\1” (tag name matches, but numeric value is still "Gray"). Also, if I move a correctly-tagged local item into iCloud Drive, it immediately becomes gray in my app (Finder still shows the correct colors). Question: What is the supported way to retrieve Finder tag colors and the correct folder icon appearance (color + overlays) for items in iCloud Drive, so that the result matches Finder? I am on macOS Tahoe 26.2/26.3, Xcode 26.2 (17C52). If you need any additional details, please let me know. Thanks!

Hey, I'm building an app that uses App Intents to modify data stored in SwiftData and synced through CloudKit. My expectation is that these changes should eventually be reflected in my app's widgets across all of the user's devices (iPhone, iPad, and Mac). However, I'm struggling to find a reliable way to ensure widgets reload when the underlying data changes as a result of a CloudKit sync. Reloading widgets on the device that modifies the data works reliably. The challenge is ensuring widgets reload on other devices after the updated data has been synced through CloudKit. In practice, this doesn't appear to happen reliably. I do not expect the user to manually open the app on those devices. I'm fine with the system launching my app in the background if that's part of the intended solution. Is there a recommended approach for keeping widgets in sync with SwiftData and CloudKit across devices? More specifically: Can WidgetKit be notified when SwiftData receives updates from CloudKit? Is there any supported way to trigger widget reloads on remote devices after a CloudKit sync? If not, what is the recommended architecture for ensuring widgets stay reasonably up to date when synchronized data changes? Things I've considered and/or tried: Calling sendChanges(_:) on CKSyncEngine from my App Intent to push changes immediately. However, this depends on an active Internet connection and doesn't address the case where changes are made offline and synchronized to CloudKit at a later time. Sending push notifications to the user's devices after an App Intent runs and using WidgetPushHandler to reload widgets. However, this requires confidence that the changes have already been uploaded to CloudKit. As far as I can tell, that's difficult or impossible to guarantee in the general case because of the issue described above. Calling fetchChanges(_:) on CKSyncEngine from the widget's timeline provider to ensure the widget has the latest data. However, the widget first needs some indication that new changes are available in CloudKit. Additionally, widget timeline reloads appear to have fairly strict execution time limits, which makes performing CloudKit synchronization work in that context seem less than ideal. My goal is for a Shortcut run on one device to update data and have widgets on all of the user's devices reflect those changes without requiring the user to manually open the app on each device. Am I thinking about this problem correctly, or is there a recommended pattern I'm missing? I'd appreciate any guidance on the intended WidgetKit + SwiftData + CloudKit integration story for this scenario. Thanks!

Hello, I'm hitting a persistent CKQuerySubscription save failure on the public database in my Production CloudKit container. I want to flag this is NOT the iOS 26.4 silent-push regression resolved in 26.4.1 (I've confirmed it manifests differently and on devices that predate that bug). App: Win 10 Min (com.luiz.PandaApp) Container: iCloud.com.luiz.PandaApp Current shipping version: 3.2.1 build 420 (approved 2026-05-19) Public database THE ERROR (captured from CKError.userInfo) CKErrorCode 12 (badRequest) CKInternalErrorDomain code 2006 ("BadSyntax") ServerErrorDescription: "attempting to create a subscription in a production container" Execution time per failed attempt: 45-90ms (gateway-level rejection, not data validation). CODE let subscription = CKQuerySubscription( recordType: "GuardianRequest", predicate: NSPredicate(format: "guardianRecordName == %@", me), subscriptionID: "guardian-incoming-(me)", options: [.firesOnRecordCreation] ) let info = CKSubscription.NotificationInfo() info.shouldSendContentAvailable = true subscription.notificationInfo = info try await container.publicCloudDatabase.save(subscription) The .save() throws every time. REPRODUCES ACROSS iPhone on iOS 26.4.2 (i.e., has the 26.4.1 CloudKit regression fix) iPhone on iOS 18.6.x (predates the 26.4 regression entirely) Multiple distinct Apple IDs / userId hashes Fresh installs via TestFlight Updated installs from production CONSISTENTLY: USER_ERROR / BAD_REQUEST. Same error every time. WHY THIS ISN'T THE iOS 26.4 REGRESSION (Thread 820562) That regression caused silent notifications to be DROPPED client-side AFTER successful subscription creation. Our failure is SubscriptionCreate itself being rejected by the CloudKit server before any subscription exists. Different layer, different symptom. iOS 18.6.x devices also fail (they never had the 26.4 token-validation regression code). CLOUDKIT CONSOLE LOGS (sample request UUIDs Apple engineers can lookup) EB30E9D0-8C97-4685-BD16-3E79B3328D6F (2026-05-17 8:08 UTC) EEAA0606-5B50-4640-A950-EEA33B790B8E (2026-05-17, captured in-app) EB4C90CE-9172-4942-B00F-DE4A28388FBA (2026-05-19 7:18 UTC, iOS 18.6.x) F2DF69D9-2339-437A-B59B-7FBD4D57442F (2026-05-19 7:51 UTC, iOS 26.4.x) CloudKit Console → Production → Subscriptions: 0 entries despite 70+ attempts since 2026-05-11. WHAT I'VE VERIFIED / TRIED Schema: GuardianRequest.guardianRecordName and GuardianResponse.requesterRecordName both have QUERYABLE indexes in the Production schema (confirmed in Console). Field types: all STRING. aps-environment entitlement: "production" (changed from "development" in build 420; no change in error pattern). Push Notifications capability: enabled on App ID in Developer Portal AND in Xcode Signing & Capabilities for the main app target. UIBackgroundModes: includes "remote-notification". Re-deployed Production schema from Development on 2026-05-19 (Console reported "no changes"; failure pattern unchanged). Tried with and without info.desiredKeys = []. RecordQuery operations on the same fields and record types in the same container succeed consistently. QUESTIONS Is there a known infrastructure issue affecting public database CKQuerySubscription creation that is distinct from the iOS 26.4 regression (thread 820562)? Is there a per-container configuration that may be in an unexpected state, and if so what should I check? Are there workarounds beyond schema redeployment that have helped other developers in similar situations? Thanks for any guidance.

I'm building a SwiftUI app with SwiftData and want to centralize both query logic and related actions in a manager class. For example, let's say I have a reading app where I need to track the currently reading book across multiple views. What I want to achieve: @Observable class ReadingManager { let modelContext: ModelContext // Ideally, I'd love to do this: @Query(filter: #Predicate<Book> { $0.isCurrentlyReading }) var currentBooks: [Book] // ❌ But @Query doesn't work here var currentBook: Book? { currentBooks.first } func startReading(_ book: Book) { // Stop current book if any if let current = currentBook { current.isCurrentlyReading = false } book.isCurrentlyReading = true try? modelContext.save() } func stopReading() { currentBook?.isCurrentlyReading = false try? modelContext.save() } } // Then use it cleanly in any view: struct BookRow: View { @Environment(ReadingManager.self) var manager let book: Book var body: some View { Text(book.title) Button("Start Reading") { manager.startReading(book) } if manager.currentBook == book { Text("Currently Reading") } } } The problem is @Query only works in SwiftUI views. Without the manager, I'd need to duplicate the same query in every view just to call these common actions. Is there a recommended pattern for this? Or should I just accept query duplication across views as the intended SwiftUI/SwiftData approach?

Hi everyone, I’m running into a breaking issue with SwiftData automatic CloudKit syncing on iOS 26, and I'm trying to determine if this is a known regression or a new configuration requirement I missed. The Setup: My setup is extremely standard; I am using the default configuration exactly as described in Apple's documentation here: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/swiftdata/syncing-model-data-across-a-persons-devices The schema is very simple: A single @Model class. No relationships. The Issue: Prior to iOS 26, this exact app was successfully syncing data between devices and to iCloud without issues. Immediately after the iOS 26 update, syncing stopped completely. I haven't changed any code, but when I check the CloudKit Console, I am seeing some BAD_REQUEST errors during sync attempts. Since I am using the default SwiftData sync (and not manual CKRecord handling), I’m not sure how my client code could be triggering a bad request unless the schema requirements have changed under the hood. Questions: Has anyone else seen increased BAD_REQUEST errors with SwiftData on iOS 26? Are there new entitlements or strict schema requirements introduced in iOS 26 that might cause a previously valid model to be rejected by CloudKit? Any pointers or confirmations would be appreciated. Thanks!

I am using SwiftData to model my data. For that i created a model called OrganizationData that contains various relationships to other entities. My data set is quite large and i am having a big performance issue when fetching all OrganizationData entities. I started debugging and looking at the sql debug log i noticed that when fetching my entities i run into faults for all relationships even when not accessing them. Fetching my entities: let fetchDescriptor = FetchDescriptor<OrganizationData>() let context = MapperContext(dataManager: self) let organizations = (try modelContainer.mainContext.fetch(fetchDescriptor)) Doing this fetch, also fetches all relationships. Each in a single query, for every OrganizationData entity. CoreData: annotation: to-many relationship fault "relationship1" for objectID 0x8aa5249772916e00 <x-coredata://B891FCEB-DF16-4E11-98E6-0AFB5D171A81/OrganizationData/p3869> fulfilled from database. Got 9 rows CoreData: annotation: to-many relationship fault "relationship2" for objectID 0x8aa5249772916e00 <x-coredata://B891FCEB-DF16-4E11-98E6-0AFB5D171A81/OrganizationData/p3869> fulfilled from database. Got 0 rows CoreData: annotation: to-many relationship fault "relationship3" for objectID 0x8aa5249772916e00 <x-coredata://B891FCEB-DF16-4E11-98E6-0AFB5D171A81/OrganizationData/p3869> fulfilled from database. Got 0 rows CoreData: annotation: to-many relationship fault "relationship4" for objectID 0x8aa5249772916e00 <x-coredata://B891FCEB-DF16-4E11-98E6-0AFB5D171A81/OrganizationData/p3869> fulfilled from database. Got 0 rows CoreData: annotation: to-many relationship fault "relationship5" for objectID 0x8aa5249772916e00 <x-coredata://B891FCEB-DF16-4E11-98E6-0AFB5D171A81/OrganizationData/p3869> fulfilled from database. Got 0 rows CoreData: annotation: to-many relationship fault "relationship6" for objectID 0x8aa5249772916e00 <x-coredata://B891FCEB-DF16-4E11-98E6-0AFB5D171A81/OrganizationData/p3869> fulfilled from database. Got 0 rows CoreData: annotation: to-many relationship fault "relationship7" for objectID 0x8aa5249772916e00 <x-coredata://B891FCEB-DF16-4E11-98E6-0AFB5D171A81/OrganizationData/p3869> fulfilled from database. Got 1 rows CoreData: annotation: to-many relationship fault "relationship8" for objectID 0x8aa5249772916e00 <x-coredata://B891FCEB-DF16-4E11-98E6-0AFB5D171A81/OrganizationData/p3869> fulfilled from database. Got 0 rows CoreData: annotation: to-many relationship fault "relationship9" for objectID 0x8aa5249772916e00 <x-coredata://B891FCEB-DF16-4E11-98E6-0AFB5D171A81/OrganizationData/p3869> fulfilled from database. Got 0 rows The relationships are all defined the same @Relationship(deleteRule: .cascade, inverse: \EntityData1.organization) var relationship1: [EntityData1] = [] Am i missing something? As far as i understood relationships are lazy and should only be faulted when accessing the property. But doing the fetch as described above already causes a query to happen, making the fetch take very long when using a large data set.

I have an iOS app using SwiftData with VersionedSchema. The schema is synchronized with an CloudKit container. I previously introduced some model properties that I have now removed, as they are no longer needed. This results in the current schema version being identical to one of the previous ones (except for its version number). This results in the following exception: 'NSInvalidArgumentException', reason: 'Duplicate version checksums across stages detected.' So it looks like we cannot have a newer schema version with an identical content to an older schema version. The intuitive way would be to re-add the old (identical) schema version to the end of the "schemas" list property in the SchemaMigrationPlan, in order to signal that it is the newest one, and to add a migration stage back to it, thus: public enum MySchemaMigrationPlan: SchemaMigrationPlan { public static var schemas: [any VersionedSchema.Type] { [ SchemaV100.self, SchemaV101.self, SchemaV100.self ] } public static var stages: [MigrationStage] { [ migrateV100toV101, migrateV101toV100 ] } However, I am not sure if this is the right way to go, as previously, as I wanted to write unit tests for schema migration and rollback, I tried defining an inverse for each migration stage, so that I could trigger a migration and a rollback from a unit test, which resulted in an exception saying that it is not supported to downgrade a VersionedSchema. I must admit that I solved the original problem by introducing a dummy model property that I will later remove. What would have been the correct approach?

Usually, when you call fetchRecordZoneChanges with the previous change token, you get a list of the record ID’s that have been deleted since your last fetch. But if you get a changeTokenExpired error because it‘s been too long since you last fetched, you have to call fetch again without a token. For my specific application, I still need to know, though, if any records have been deleted since my last sync. How can I get that information if I no longer have a valid change token?

I'm trying to understand the terminology around forward vs backward references in CloudKit. Say I have two record types: User LeaderboardScore (a score belongs to a user) The score record stores a user reference: score["user"] = CKRecord.Reference( recordID: userRecordID, action: .deleteSelf ) So: LeaderboardScore → User The user record does not store any references to scores From a data-model perspective: Is this considered a forward reference (child → parent)? Or a back reference, since the score is "pointing back" to its owner? My use case is having leaderboard in my app and so i have created a user table to store all the users and a score table for saving the scores of each user of the app.

There is a conflict in SwiftData (specifically when synced with CloudKit) when a @Model attribute shares the same name as a case within its assigned enum type. When this occurs, accessing the attribute on a model instance consistently returns the value corresponding to the enum case name, rather than the actual value persisted in the database. Steps to Reproduce Define an enumeration (e.g., Status) with a case that matches a planned property name (e.g., case status). Create a SwiftData @Model that uses this enum. Name the property in the model the same as the enum case. Attempt to save and then retrieve the value. Example Code enum TaskStatus: String, Codable { case status // The conflict source case pending case completed } @Model class TodoItem { // Conflict: Property name matches enum case name var status: TaskStatus init(status: TaskStatus) { self.status = status } } Expected Behavior The property item.status should return the value stored in the database (e.g., .pending or .completed). Actual Behavior The property item.status consistently resolves to the enum case .status, ignoring the actual persisted data.

Hi everyone, On macOS 26.4 beta (with Xcode 26.4 beta), I’m seeing the following console messages in a brand new SwiftData + CloudKit template project (no custom logic added, fresh CloudKit container): updateTaskRequest called for a pre-running task com.apple.coredata.cloudkit.activity.export.F9EE783D-7521-4EC2-B42C-9FD1F29BA5C4 updateTaskRequest called for an already running/updated task com.apple.coredata.cloudkit.activity.export.F9EE783D-7521-4EC2-B42C-9FD1F29BA5C4 Error updating background task request: Error Domain=BGSystemTaskSchedulerErrorDomain Code=8 "(null)" These messages appear: When CloudKit is enabled Occasionally on app launch Often when bringing the app back to the foreground (Cmd-Tab away and back) Even with zero additional SwiftData logic They do not appear when CloudKit is disabled. This behavior is reproducible on a completely new project with a fresh CloudKit container. Questions: What exactly do these messages indicate? Is BGSystemTaskScheduler Code=8 expected in this context? Are these safe to ignore? Is this a known change in logging behavior in macOS 26.4 beta? Additionally, in a larger project I’ve observed SwiftData crashes and initially suspected these logs might be related. However, since the issue reproduces in a fresh template project, I’m unsure whether this is simply verbose beta logging or something more serious. Any clarification would be appreciated. Filed as FB21993521.

Hi, Overview: I get the following error when trying to save / read from SwiftData It happens when I try to save color to SwiftData (code below) Error 'NSKeyedUnarchiveFromData' should not be used to for un-archiving and will be removed in a future release Questions How can I resolve the error? I am not directly using data, I am using just Float values, swift types. Why am I getting this error? Is there a way to add a breakpoint to stop at the exact type causing the error? (Symbolic breakpoint doesn't seem to help) Or is the below code ok and not responsible for the error? Code import SwiftUI nonisolated struct ColorRepresentation: Codable { let red: Float let green: Float let blue: Float let opacity: Float init(colorResolved: Color.Resolved) { red = colorResolved.red green = colorResolved.green blue = colorResolved.blue opacity = colorResolved.opacity } func color() throws -> Color { Color( red: Double(red), green: Double(green), blue: Double(blue), opacity: Double(opacity) ) } } extension ColorRepresentation: Equatable {}

I'm using NSPersistentCloudKitContainer with Core Data and I receive errors because my iCloud space is full. The errors printed are the following: <CKError 0x280df8e40: "Quota Exceeded" (25/2035); server message = "Quota exceeded"; op = 61846C533467A5DF; uuid = 6A144513-033F-42C2-9E27-693548EF2150; Retry after 342.0 seconds>. I want to inform the user about this issue, but I can't find a way to access the details of the error. I'm listening to NSPersistentCloudKitContainer.eventChangedNotification, I receive a error of type .partialFailure. But when I want to access the underlying errors, the partialErrorsByItemID property on the error is nil. How can I access this Quota Exceeded error? import Foundation import CloudKit import Combine import CoreData class SyncMonitor { fileprivate var subscriptions = Set<AnyCancellable>() init() { NotificationCenter.default.publisher(for: NSPersistentCloudKitContainer.eventChangedNotification) .sink { notification in if let cloudEvent = notification.userInfo?[NSPersistentCloudKitContainer.eventNotificationUserInfoKey] as? NSPersistentCloudKitContainer.Event { guard let ckerror = cloudEvent.error as? CKError else { return } print("Error: \(ckerror.localizedDescription)") if ckerror.code == .partialFailure { guard let errors = ckerror.partialErrorsByItemID else { return } for (_, error) in errors { if let currentError = error as? CKError { print(currentError.localizedDescription) } } } } } // end of sink .store(in: &subscriptions) } }

Hello, From the documentation linked below, the limitations for Background Assets are the following: Size Limit: 200 GB Asset Pack Count: 100 I'm expecting I will need ~175 Asset Packs and around 500GB of storage. I understand Background Assets is a new, but is there a process or a potential that these limits will be increased in the future? Or is there a way to request an increase? I've tried contacting Apple Support as this is more of an Admin issue, however they've directed me here. Case ID 102725356578 https://developer.apple.com/help/app-store-connect/reference/apple-hosted-asset-pack-size-limits Thank you, Tanner

Here is what I thought I want to give each user a unique container, when the user login or register, the user could isolate their data in specific container. I shared the container in a singleton actor, I found it's possible to update the container in that actor. But I think it won't affect the modelContext which is in the Environment. Does SwiftData allow me or recommend to do that?

I'm using Swift Data for an app that requires iOS 18. All of my models conform to a protocol that guarantees they have a 'serverID' String variable. I wrote a function that would allow me to pass in a serverID String and have it fetch the model object that matched. Because I am lazy and don't like writing the same functions over and over, I used a Self reference so that all of my conforming models get this static function. Imagine my model is called "WhatsNew". Here's some code defining the protocol and the fetching function. protocol RemotelyFetchable: PersistentModel { var serverID: String { get } } extension WhatsNew: RemotelyFetchable {} extension RemotelyFetchable { static func fetchOne(withServerID identifier: String, inContext modelContext: ModelContext) -> Self? { var fetchDescriptor = FetchDescriptor<Self>() fetchDescriptor.predicate = #Predicate<Self> { $0.serverID == identifier } do { let allModels = try modelContext.fetch(fetchDescriptor) return allModels.first } catch { return nil } } } Worked great! Or so I thought... I built this and happily ran a debug build in the Simulator and on devices for months while developing the initial version but when I went to go do a release build for TestFlight, that build reliably crashed on every device with a message like this: SwiftData/DataUtilities.swift:65: Fatal error: Couldn't find \WhatsNew. on WhatsNew with fields [SwiftData.Schema.PropertyMetadata(name: "serverID", keypath: \WhatsNew., defaultValue: nil, metadata: Optional(Attribute - name: , options: [unique], valueType: Any, defaultValue: nil, hashModifier: nil)), SwiftData.Schema.PropertyMetadata(name: "title", keypath: \WhatsNew., defaultValue: nil, metadata: nil), SwiftData.Schema.PropertyMetadata(name: "bulletPoints", keypath: \WhatsNew.)>, defaultValue: nil, metadata: nil), SwiftData.Schema.PropertyMetadata(name: "dateDescription", keypath: \WhatsNew., defaultValue: nil, metadata: nil), SwiftData.Schema.PropertyMetadata(name: "readAt", keypath: \WhatsNew.)>, defaultValue: nil, metadata: nil)] It seems (cannot confirm) that something in the release build optimization process is stripping out some metadata / something about these models that makes this predicate crash. Tested on iOS 18.0 and 18.1 beta. How can I resolve this? I have two dozen types that conform to this protocol. I could manually specialize this function for every type myself but... ugh.