macOS is the operating system for Mac.

Posts under macOS tag

200 Posts

Post

Replies

Boosts

Views

Activity

Wait Time for Siri AI waitlist
There seems to be a lack of clarity about how this Siri AI rollout is working. Does the indexing have anything to do with getting taken off the waitlist, or are they completely separate? Also, what is the expected wait time and has anyone gotten the new Siri after the initial wave of approvals (after 4 hours after the keynote)? The waitlist is extremely slow compared to the initial Apple Intelligence waitlist from a couple of years ago.
6
4
646
1m
Can macOS 27 VMs be run on older versions of macOS?
As the title says, I'd like to run a macOS 27 VM on my Mac (the host is on macOS 26.5.1) in order to test my apps without having to update my host to a beta. My virtualization app of choice (VirtualBuddy) fails on installation when I use the restore image for macOS 27.0 (26A5353q) from the developer website. The developer of VirtualBuddy believes this is a macOS limitation (https://github.com/insidegui/VirtualBuddy/discussions/683). (I filed FB22977958, but I'm not sure if they filed their own bug.) Is there a workaround? It'd be very nice to have access to this during WWDC week. Usually I'd look for device support files on the developer website for download and/or install the Xcode beta first, but I've already installed the Xcode beta and there don't seem to be any device support files available.
1
1
87
1h
macOS 27 Golden Gate: com.apple.spaces plist restructured — 'Monitors' key replaced by 'SpacesDisplayConfiguration', breaking third-party window managers (FB23017010)
I'm building a window layout manager that saves and restores window positions across Spaces when switching between display configurations (laptop / docked 3-monitor / Vision Pro). Spencer 1.4.4 handles this today but broke on Golden Gate beta with "Cannot detect number of Spaces." I built a diagnostic probe to find the root cause. FINDINGS (macOS 27.0 Build 26A5353q): CGSPrivate symbols — all intact and functional: CGSMainConnectionID, CGSCopySpaces, CGSGetWindowWorkspace, CGSMoveWindowsToManagedSpace all resolve via dlsym and work correctly. CGSCopySpaces(mask=7) returns 14 valid space IDs. This is NOT the source of the breakage. com.apple.spaces plist — structure changed in Golden Gate: The top-level 'Monitors' key is gone. It has moved to: SpacesDisplayConfiguration → Management Data → Monitors New top-level keys: [SpacesDisplayConfiguration, app-bindings, spans-displays] This IS the root cause. Spencer's parser looks for 'Monitors', finds nothing, and fails. One-line fix once confirmed stable. CGSGetWindowWorkspace returns Space ID 0 for windows set to 'all desktops'. Valid space IDs in this session are 30, 15, 14, 12, 11, 10 — so 0 appears to be a sentinel value for that condition. Full probe output: `SpacesProbe v1.0 — WWDC 2026 Developer Lab ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ System: Version 27.0 (Build 26A5353q) Date: 2026-06-09 21:41:33 +0000 ── PUBLIC API (stable, no entitlements needed) ──────────── ✅ CGWindowListCopyWindowInfo: 17 on-screen windows found ✅ CGGetActiveDisplayList: 1 active display(s) ✅ Accessibility (AXIsProcessTrusted): GRANTED ✅ AXUIElement read: 'Cursor Pro' @ 1427,906 438×438 ✅ AXUIElement write: SUCCESS (nudged window +1px and restored — non-destructive) ── com.apple.spaces PLIST (what Spencer reads to understand Space topology) Path: /Users/csj/Library/Preferences/com.apple.spaces.plist ✅ Plist file exists ✅ Plist readable and deserializable ✅ Monitors in plist: 8 ✅ Total spaces found: 14 Top-level keys: [SpacesDisplayConfiguration, app-bindings, spans-displays] ⚡ GOLDEN GATE: 'Monitors' replaced by 'SpacesDisplayConfiguration' SpacesDisplayConfiguration sub-keys: [Management Data, Space Properties] Monitors (under Management Data): 8 Monitor 0: 14 space(s) ⚠️ 'Monitors' key gone in Golden Gate — moved to SpacesDisplayConfiguration. Spencer parser needs update to read new key. → These anomalies cause Spencer 1.4.4 to report → "Cannot detect number of Spaces" on Golden Gate beta. ── CGSPrivate BRIDGE (private API — the only path to Space assignment) Resolution via dlsym — nil = symbol removed from this OS build ✅ CGSMainConnectionID ✅ CGSCopySpaces ✅ CGSGetWindowWorkspace ✅ CGSMoveWindowsToManagedSpace Connection ID: 3175291 ✅ CGSCopySpaces(mask=7): 14 spaces → 30, 15, 14, 12, 11, 10 ✅ CGSGetWindowWorkspace(wid=99): Space ID = 0 ── SUMMARY ───────────────────────────────────────────────── ✅ Window enumeration (CGWindowListCopyWindowInfo): WORKS ✅ Window position read/write (AXUIElement): WORKS ✅ Display topology (CGGetActiveDisplayList): WORKS ❌ com.apple.spaces plist parsing: BROKEN (1 anomalies) ✅ CGSPrivate Space management symbols: ALL PRESENT Feedback: feedbackassistant.apple.com FB23017010QUESTIONS: Is the new SpacesDisplayConfiguration.Management Data.Monitors path stable and intended for use by third-party tools, or still an implementation detail subject to change? Is Space ID 0 from CGSGetWindowWorkspace the stable sentinel for 'window assigned to all desktops', or is there a proper API for detecting that condition? Is there an entitlement (com.apple.private.spaces or equivalent) that can be granted to productivity tools distributed outside the App Store for Space management? What is the intended supported mechanism for a third-party app to save and restore window Space assignments on macOS? Feedback: FB23017010
0
0
7
2h
macOS 27 Beta 1 Install Failure
Hello, I'm unable to install macOS 27 Beta 1 on relatively clean test system - 15" MacBook Air M4 16GB RAM. Error from installer log: Jun 9 09:55:29 COMPUTERNAME osinstallersetupd[11696]: Operation queue failed with error: Error Domain=com.apple.OSInstallerSetup.error Code=1007 "An error occurred preparing the update." UserInfo={NSLocalizedRecoverySuggestion=Failed to personalize the software update. Please try again., NSLocalizedDescription=An error occurred preparing the update., NSUnderlyingError=0xbdbf93f30 {Error Domain=SUMacControllerError Code=7723 "[SUMacControllerErrorPreflightPersonalizeFailed=7723] Failed to perform PreflightPersonalize operation: [MobileSoftwareUpdateErrorDomain(MSU):MSU_ERR_PERSONALIZATION_FAILURE(2)_1_MobileSoftwareUpdateErrorDomain(MSU):MSU_ERR_GLOBAL_TICKET_INVALID(53)]" UserInfo={NSLocalizedDescription=Failed to personalize the software update. Please try again., SUMacControllerErrorIndicationsMask=0, NSDebugDescription=[SUMacControllerErrorPreflightPersonalizeFailed=7723] Failed to perform PreflightPersonalize operation: [MobileSoftwareUpdateErrorDomain(MSU):MSU_ERR_PERSONALIZATION_FAILURE(2)_1_MobileSoftwareUpdateErrorDomain(MSU):MSU_ERR_GLOBAL_TICKET_INVALID(53)], NSUnderlyingError=0xbdbf93b10 {Error Domain=MobileSoftwareUpdateErrorDomain Code=2 "Could not personalize boot/firmware bundle." UserInfo={NSUnderlyingError=0xbdbf93d80 {Error Domain=MobileSoftwareUpdateErrorDomain Code=53 "Global ticket failed to verify" UserInfo=0xbdbfd2be0 (not displayed)}, NSLocalizedDescription=Could not personalize boot/firmware bundle., target_update=26A5353q}}}}} Not sure if anyone else has experienced this error?
2
1
115
4h
Charging Limit misalignment, 80% or 94%?
Hello Apple, I have been facing an issue with charging, although I have beta updates off, but I faced an issue that in my opinion should show pulsing Amber on MagSafe, like I mentioned in my other thread. The MagSafe was glowing amber. Ok, can’t be on 80% yet. I opened the lid, and I found something I never expected: Although it was supposed to stop on 80%, it continued to 94% with no user notification. This happens every once in a while, but isn’t extremely rare. Last time this happened was about a week after macOS 26.5 was launched. I was running macOS 26.5 when this occurred Please consider this as an issue that needs to be fixed, and one of the ways is the MagSafe update, so the user at least knows something is wrong in case something like this ever happens. Please ask me for more information regarding this issue if needed. I am ready to mark the other post as answered if this gets a good reply, and keep in mind that I am conscious of what im doing, so please give this a good read and reply. Please do not count this as spam, I am only doing this to get it fixed, it may seem like a never reported before issue, but it’s still a real one. I am sorry that my previous replies on the forums were useless, and I promise to not reply to posts I don’t know about anymore. I am not a trained developer, and I hope you accept the apology. Thanks, Alyaman
1
0
21
7h
Apple AUGraphicEQ dead-lock
Hi, I encounter a dead-lock with Apple AUGraphicEQ. I have attached backtrace: thread #44, name = 'com.apple.audio.toolbox.AUScheduledParameterRefresher' frame #0: 0x0000000182059bb0 libsystem_kernel.dylib`semaphore_wait_trap + 8 frame #1: 0x000000018e9e7e00 caulk`caulk::semaphore::timed_wait(double) + 224 frame #2: 0x000000018e9e7cac caulk`caulk::concurrent::details::worker_thread::run() + 32 frame #3: 0x000000018e9e794c caulk`void* caulk::thread_proxy<std::__1::tuple<caulk::thread::attributes, void (caulk::concurrent::details::worker_thread::*)(), std::__1::tuple<caulk::concurrent::details::worker_thread*>>>(void*) + 96 frame #4: 0x000000018209dc58 libsystem_pthread.dylib`_pthread_start + 136 regards, Joël
1
0
413
9h
MagSafe charging light problem
Dear Apple, It looks likes Apple like my new idea, and a lot. I know this as Apple always want their things to be easily understandable, and for MagSafe to be understandable it has to mimic macOS. I got an unreliable reply for the first post, just a person telling me I’m in the wrong place for this. The MagSafe is amazing, but everything needs to be upgraded in some way or the other, DTS engineers are saying that developer forums are for developing, not feedback. So here I am, developing the MagSafe wire, as I would by now rather get a third-party MagSafe wire if mine possibly breaks. $49. This is the price tag for an official MagSafe wire. If it can’t show anything but charging and charged, it’s something that must be reproduced. We have the hardware, we have the red and green diodes in the MagSafe, we just need to turn both of them on to make yellow. We have the hardware, and physics is helping us by saying: “Red + green light = yellow light.” This isn’t as complicated as π, so please implement it and let over 100 million users feel that MagSafe is finally worth the price. It is extremely simple, no new tests, no new safety certifications, just a new code you can forget about once released. To make things as easy as possible, here is the code, you can inspect it and test it, it should be OK. (THIS CODE IS TO SHOW THE BASE OF THE IDEA, PLEASE DONT COPY-PASTE, DOUBLE CHECK IT FIRST. Consider that I didn’t code this myself, I got help. Don’t expect any code from me to be mine) #include <stdbool.h> #include <stdint.h> typedef enum { MODEL_AIR, MODEL_PRO } MacModel; typedef enum { LED_OFF, LED_SOLID_AMBER, LED_SOLID_YELLOW, LED_SOLID_GREEN, LED_PULSING_AMBER, LED_PULSING_YELLOW } LEDState; uint32_t current_cycle_seconds = 0; MacModel get_mac_model(void); uint8_t get_battery_soc(void); uint8_t get_charge_limit(void); uint32_t get_charger_wattage(void); bool check_hardware_faults(void); void apply_led_hardware_state(LEDState state, bool pin_high); void update_magsafe_led(void) { MacModel model = get_mac_model(); uint8_t soc = get_battery_soc(); uint8_t limit = get_charge_limit(); uint32_t wattage = get_charger_wattage(); bool overcharge_fault = (soc > (limit + 2)); bool critical_error = check_hardware_faults() || overcharge_fault; bool slow_charger = false; if (model == MODEL_AIR && wattage < 30) { slow_charger = true; } else if (model == MODEL_PRO && wattage < 70) { slow_charger = true; } LEDState normal_state; if (soc >= 90 || soc >= limit) { normal_state = LED_SOLID_GREEN; } else if (soc >= 50) { normal_state = LED_SOLID_YELLOW; } else { normal_state = LED_SOLID_AMBER; } LEDState active_state = normal_state; bool should_pulse = false; if (current_cycle_seconds < 10) { if (critical_error) { active_state = LED_PULSING_AMBER; should_pulse = true; } else if (slow_charger) { active_state = LED_PULSING_YELLOW; should_pulse = true; } } bool led_pin_high = true; if (should_pulse) { if (current_cycle_seconds % 2 != 0) { led_pin_high = false; } } apply_led_hardware_state(active_state, led_pin_high); current_cycle_seconds++; if (current_cycle_seconds >= 20) { current_cycle_seconds = 0; } } (THIS CODE IS TO SHOW THE BASE OF THE IDEA, PLEASE DONT COPY-PASTE, DOUBLE CHECK IT FIRST. Consider that I didn’t code this myself, I got help. Don’t expect any code from me to be mine) This should show: Pulsing Amber for critical issues Pulsing yellow for slow chargers, under 30w for Macbook air and if under 70w for Macbook pro. Pulses for 10 seconds, and shows the light of the battery percentage for 10 seconds. Amber: 0-50% battery Yellow: 50-90% battery Green: 90%+ battery or reached charging limit. Please consider this code, I prefer a reply if possible to keep track of the new MagSafe update. macOS is amazing, but there are always final touches to be added, and if the hardware can be as similar as possible to the software, this is what brings understanding the battery alive, and apple has always wanted macOS to be as understandable as possible, why not the wire as well? If you need any extra information for the MagSafe, feel free to reply to me on the forum, I will try replying as soon as possible. Let the MagSafe glow. Let it show a yellow. It’s WWDC, and here I am right here. Let 2026 be the year where MagSafe is the most understandable yet, and let the yellow color come alive to MagSafe. Please consider it another chance to get a fresh, serious and realistic start to this. I am more than ready to mark the other post as answered if I get a realistic, understandable and useful reply to this. I apologize if my previous responses weren't very useful; I am not a formally trained engineer, but I wanted to show my idea the best way I could. May I please get a proper reply? Im extremely sorry for my previous replies that lost me reputation, but I promise I won’t reply to other posts from now on. May I please get a proper reply? May my idea get supported? May MagSafe feel as good as the magnetic “snap”? Please keep in mind that im in developer forums to develop the MagSafe wire, and as the DTS engineer stated in their reply: “ These forums are for questions about developing software and accessories for Apple platforms. If this is the case then feel free to provide more information,” In this thread here. There I am. Developing an accessory. MagSafe. I have been using macOS for about a year now, I noticed this flaw since a long time, and here I am, getting it out and loud to Apple in WWDC. Please do not count this as spam, or a repost of my original idea, I am conscious of what im currently doing, so please give this a good read and a caring, useful reply. I really hope you consider this and make MagSafe stand out, alongside the MacBook Neo. It was amazing. Unstoppable. But why not the MagSafe be as well? All the best, Alyaman
Topic: Design SubTopic: General Tags:
0
0
28
10h
Can APNs wake a sleeping Mac for a third-party app?
I'm building a macOS app and trying to confirm whether there's a way for me to remotely wake a Mac so my app can do a small amount of work (using APNs silent notifications or any other technique). Here's what I want to happen: User runs my app on their Mac User puts the Mac to sleep (Apple menu > Sleep) 30 minutes later, my server sends a push notification (content-available: 1, apns-push-type: background, apns-priority: 5) via APNs to the Mac Note: Power Nap and Wake for Network Access are enabled The Mac dark-wakes, delivers the notification to my app via application(_:didReceiveRemoteNotification:), my app gets ~30 seconds to open a WebSocket, do some work, and return Mac goes back to sleep So far, I've been able to send silent push notifications to a sleeping Mac, but my app only gets to take action on them after the Mac has been awoken manually. I've tried both silent pushes (content-available: 1, priority 5) and alert pushes (priority 10) with the same result. After trying every option I can find, I don't believe notifications can wake a sleeping Mac and allow my third-party app to process data, but I really want to be wrong. Can anyone confirm whether or not this is possible?
3
0
132
1d
macOS 26.5.1: Age Range Setup Assistant pane cannot be skipped with MDM SetupAssistant payload outside ADE
Hello, I’m trying to clarify whether the new Age Range / Age Assurance Setup Assistant pane can be skipped on macOS when using a standard MDM Device Enrollment flow, not Automated Device Enrollment. Environment: Platform: macOS Tahoe 26.5.1 Enrollment type: MDM Device Enrollment, not ADE / DEP MDM: Microsoft Intune Profile deployment channel: Device profile Payload type: com.apple.SetupAssistant.managed Key used: SkipSetupItems Skip items tested: AgeAssurance AgeBasedSafetySettings The configuration profile installs successfully on the Mac as a device profile. I can confirm that the com.apple.SetupAssistant.managed payload is present on the device and includes the tested SkipSetupItems values. However, the Age Range / age-related Setup Assistant pane is still shown to the user. Example payload content: <dict> <key>PayloadType</key> <string>com.apple.SetupAssistant.managed</string> <key>PayloadIdentifier</key> <string>com.example.setupassistant.managed</string> <key>PayloadUUID</key> <string>REDACTED-UUID</string> <key>PayloadVersion</key> <integer>1</integer> <key>PayloadDisplayName</key> <string>Managed Setup Assistant</string> <key>SkipSetupItems</key> <array> <string>AgeAssurance</string> <string>AgeBasedSafetySettings</string> </array> </dict> What I expected: When the com.apple.SetupAssistant.managed payload is installed as a device-level profile and includes the relevant age-related skip keys, the Age Range / Age Assurance pane should be skipped during Setup Assistant, or Apple documentation should state clearly that this pane can only be skipped in ADE. What actually happens: The profile installs, but the Age Range / age-related Setup Assistant pane still appears to the user on macOS 26.5.1. Documentation ambiguity: Apple’s Setup Assistant payload documentation says: The supported payload identifier is com.apple.SetupAssistant.managed Supported operating systems/channels include macOS device and macOS user Supported enrollment methods include User Enrollment, Device Enrollment, and Automated Device Enrollment SkipSetupItems is a list of Setup Assistant panes that can be skipped Apple’s macOS Tahoe 26 enterprise notes say: “The new Age Range setup pane is automatically skipped for devices using Automated Device Enrollment.” That wording clearly mentions ADE, but I have not found documentation that explicitly states whether the Age Range pane is intentionally unsupported for non-ADE macOS MDM enrollment, or whether there is a separate skip key required for macOS. Third-party MDM/tooling documentation appears to reference the following newer skip keys: AgeAssurance AgeBasedSafetySettings However, it is unclear whether those keys are supported on macOS, iOS/iPadOS only, ADE only, or all MDM enrollment methods. Questions: Are AgeAssurance and AgeBasedSafetySettings valid SkipSetupItems values on macOS 26.5.1? If yes, are they supported only during Automated Device Enrollment, or should they also work with standard MDM Device Enrollment? If these keys are iOS/iPadOS-only, what is the correct macOS skip item for the Age Range / age-related Setup Assistant pane? Is the Age Range pane intentionally only auto-skipped in ADE on macOS? Should Apple’s public Device Management / SkipKeys documentation be updated to list the correct key names, supported platforms, minimum OS versions, and enrollment requirements? This is important for Mac deployments where devices are enrolled into MDM but are not assigned through Apple Business Manager / Automated Device Enrollment. At the moment, it is difficult to determine whether the behavior is expected, unsupported, or a bug in macOS / Setup Assistant / MDM profile handling. Thanks.
1
0
152
2d
Time Machine destination automatically converted to Case-Sensitive APFS in macOS Tahoe?
Mac: MacBook Pro 16-inch (Intel, 2019) macOS: Tahoe 26.5.1 I'm trying to determine whether this is expected behavior or a bug. Setup I purchased a new 2TB SSD to use exclusively for Time Machine. Before configuring Time Machine, I manually erased the SSD in Disk Utility and formatted it as: APFS (non-case-sensitive) Encrypted I specifically did not choose APFS (Case-sensitive). What happened After selecting the SSD as a Time Machine destination and allowing macOS to prepare the disk, I later checked the volume information and found: File System Personality: Case-sensitive APFS and: APFS Volume Disk (Role): Backup Name: Brad Mac Backups SSD (Case-sensitive) The volume appears to have been converted to a dedicated APFS Backup volume and is now reported as case-sensitive. Additional observations After backups complete: tmutil status reports: Running = 0 indicating Time Machine is no longer running. However, Spotlight processes (mds and mds_store) continue accessing the backup volume for many hours afterwards, preventing normal ejection of the SSD. Using: sudo lsof | grep "/Volumes/Brad Mac Backups SSD" shows Spotlight processes holding the drive open. Finder's "Force Eject" works successfully. Questions Is it expected behavior in macOS Tahoe for Time Machine to create a Case-sensitive APFS Backup volume, even when the destination was originally formatted as standard APFS? Has anyone else observed a Time Machine destination changing from APFS (non-case-sensitive) to APFS (Case-sensitive) during setup? Could the case-sensitive APFS format be related to Spotlight continuously indexing the backup volume and preventing normal ejection? Relevant Output diskutil info disk3s2 returns: File System Personality: Case-sensitive APFS and: diskutil apfs list shows: APFS Volume Disk (Role): Backup Name: Brad Mac Backups SSD (Case-sensitive) Mount Point: /Volumes/Brad Mac Backups SSD 1 Any insight would be appreciated, as Apple Support was unable to explain why the backup volume became case-sensitive.
0
0
69
3d
Orphaned 9GB Simulator Runtime in /System/Library/AssetsV2 - Cannot Delete (SIP protected)
I have an orphaned asset folder taking up 9.13GB located at: /System/Library/AssetsV2/com_apple_MobileAsset_iOSSimulatorRuntime/c0d3fd05106683ba0b3680d4d1afec65f098d700.asset It contains SimulatorRuntimeAsset version 18.5 (Build 22F77). Active Version: My current Xcode setup is using version 26.2 (Build 23C54). I checked the plist files in the directory and found what seems to be the cause of the issue: The "Never Collected" Flag: The Info.plist inside the orphaned asset folder explicitly sets the garbage collection behavior to "NeverCollected": <key>__AssetDefaultGarbageCollectionBehavior</key> <string>NeverCollected</string> The Catalog Mismatch: The master catalog file (com_apple_MobileAsset_iOSSimulatorRuntime.xml) in the parent directory only lists the new version (26.2). Because the old version (18.5) is missing from this XML, Xcode and mobileassetd seem to have lost track of it entirely. What I Have Tried (All Failed) Xcode Components: The version 18.5 does not appear in Settings -> Components, so I cannot delete it via the GUI. Simctl: xcrun simctl list runtimes does not list this version. Running xcrun simctl runtime delete 22F77 fails with: "No runtime disk images or bundles found matching '22F77'." Manual Deletion: sudo rm -rf [path] fails with "Operation not permitted", presumably because /System/Library/AssetsV2 is SIP-protected. Third-party Tools: Apps like DevCleaner do not detect this runtime (likely because they only scan ~/Library or /Library, not /System/Library). Has anyone found a way to force the system (perhaps via mobileassetd or a specific xcrun flag) to re-evaluate this folder and respect a deletion request? I am trying to avoid booting into Recovery Mode just to delete a cache file. Any insights on how AssetsV2 handles these "orphaned" files would be appreciated.
20
8
2.5k
4d
NWParameters.preferNoProxies ignored for NWConnection when system Automatic Proxy Configuration (PAC) is enabled
We are implementing a Network Extension that uses NETransparentProxyProvider. For browser TCP flows we terminate in the extension and re‑originate traffic with NWConnection. Per documentation, we set NWParameters.preferNoProxies = true on that NWConnection so it should not use the system HTTP/HTTPS proxy configuration, including PAC‑selected explicit proxies. Observation: With System Settings → Network → Proxies → Automatic proxy configuration pointing at a PAC file that returns something like PROXY 127.0.0.1:8888 for relevant traffic, we still see our NWConnection traffic show up at the local explicit proxy as a normal CONNECT host:443 tunnel. That suggests PAC / explicit proxy selection is still being applied to sockets we believed were opted out via preferNoProxies. This is affecting interoperability: the browser may evaluate PAC with a hostname (e.g. a site configured as DIRECT), while a separate NWConnection may be evaluated in a context where the logical host is an IPv4 literal, so the same PAC script can return PROXY for what the user thinks is the “same” destination. We had expected preferNoProxies to remove the second leg from PAC/proxy entirely. Expected: NWConnection with preferNoProxies == true should connect without opening an explicit CONNECT session to the PAC‑configured proxy (unless there is documented behavior that NE‑originated traffic is intentionally exempt from this flag). Actual: Traffic from the NWConnection path still reaches the explicit proxy (we can log CONNECT … on a minimal local proxy). Environment: macOS Tahoe 26.5 (25F71), Network Extension / App Proxy provider, PAC served over local http, Safari as client. Questions: Is preferNoProxies guaranteed to bypass PAC‑selected explicit proxies for NWConnection from Network Extension processes, or are there known exceptions (e.g. certain interfaces, MDM, networkserviceproxy, etc.)? If this is by design, what is the supported way for an NE to open an outbound TCP connection that must not inherit system PAC/proxy?
2
1
148
5d
macOS Tahoe 26.5 File System
I updated my OS to Tahoe 26.5 several days ago. Now, I'm developing a new macOS application under it. What I notice about it is that it can take the application at several seconds to select a file or a folder with NSSavePanel, NSOpenPanel and .fileImporter. First, I thought it's just my application. But it's not. Preview acts the same. First, a progress wheel keeps rolling several seconds. Then it will disappear, and you won't be able to select a folder for another several seconds. Why do they make it more difficult to use every time they release a new OS version? Why don't Reviewers notice when they test it? Wait for 10 seconds or more just to select a file or a folder? It's disappointing. I wish I could go back to macOS 15.7.
1
0
140
6d
Does @IBSegueAction still not work for AppKit relationship segues from NSWindowController?
I’m working on a storyboard-based AppKit application that uses an NSWindowController containing an NSSplitViewController with multiple child view controllers. The hierarchy is roughly: NSWindowController └── NSSplitViewController ├── NSViewController ├── NSViewController └── NSViewController I am trying to provide dependencies during storyboard instantiation using either @IBSegueAction or instantiateInitialController(creator:), rather than configuring everything after initialisation. What I attempted I added custom initialisers to my view controllers so I can pass dependencies at creation time: class SplitViewController: NSSplitViewController { let dependency: Dependency init?(coder: NSCoder, dependency: Dependency) { self.dependency = dependency super.init(coder: coder) } required init?(coder: NSCoder) { print("init(coder:) was called") fatalError("init(coder:) is not supported") } } I then attempted to intercept storyboard instantiation using @IBSegueAction, trying it in both the window controller and the split view controller: @IBSegueAction func makeSplitViewController(_ coder: NSCoder) -> NSSplitViewController? { SplitViewController(coder: coder, dependency: dependency) } I also tried attaching the segue action at different points in the storyboard, but the behaviour did not change. Observed behaviour Regardless of where I place the segue action, AppKit still appears to call: required init?(coder: NSCoder) This means my custom initialiser is never used for the split view controller or its children. Background reference I found this older known issue in the Xcode 11 release notes: “A Segue Action on a relationship segue between a NSWindowController and a View Controller is currently not supported and ignored. (48252727)” This suggests that, at least historically, AppKit relationship segues ignored segue actions entirely. Has this limitation since been fixed in modern Xcode/macOS SDK releases, or are relationship segues involving NSWindowController still incompatible with @IBSegueAction? More generally, what is the intended way to provide dependencies to an NSSplitViewController and its child view controllers in a storyboard-based AppKit application? I am also unclear whether instantiateInitialController(creator:) participates in the creation of container hierarchies like split view controllers, or only top-level controllers.
0
0
160
1w
In-app purchase fails on Apple Silicon Mac
I'm testing IPhone and iPad Apps on Apple Silicon Macs. When I purchase In-app product in the app on Apple Silicon Mac, the payment receipt is not created, so the purchase fails. In console log, it says it doesn't have permission to write to the file. storekitagent [6913DE38_SK1] Error writing receipt (5095 bytes) to file:///Users/XXXX/Library/Containers/90FE2A60-9FDF-4ECF-848F-CE3D396322CA/Data/StoreKit/sandboxReceipt: Error Domain=NSCocoaErrorDomain Code=513 "You don’t have permission to save the file “sandboxReceipt” in the folder “StoreKit”" UserInfo={NSFilePath=/Users/XXXX/Library/Containers/90FE2A60-9FDF-4ECF-848F-CE3D396322CA/Data/StoreKit/sandboxReceipt, NSUnderlyingError=0x14202c920 {Error Domain=NSPOSIXErrorDomain Code=1 "Operation not permitted"}} The App is using Original API for In-App Purchase written in Objective-C. When I purchase in-app product, the app calls SKPaymentQueue::addPayment. And then it gets paymentQueue:updatedTransactions callback with SKPaymentTransactionStatePurchased. This means that the payment was successful. But the receipt is not created so I can't continue the after process. I'm testing with sandbox in-app purchase. I have tested several times and confirmed that on macOS Monterey 12.2 the receipt is created successfully, but on macOS Ventura 13.2 the receipt isn't created. I think there is something to do with macOS version. Does anyone have any solutions? Here is a very similar thread on apple developer forum. (And there too has no anwsers)  https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/719505
8
0
1.8k
1w
Charging limit misalignment, 80% limit vs 94% real life battery
I was recently charging my macbook, just like any normal time i do. i expected to see the battery at 80%, but the macbook was hiding a surprise for me. the magsafe glowed amber, so i knew it cant be on 80%, so when i opened the lid, the surprise was a shocking 94%. I didn't know what to expect, but my macbook is running macOS tahoe 26.5, so everything seemed normal to me until: someone please help in fixing this bug, as it isn't the first time this happens to me. please link this to my magsafe 4 idea here, as the magsafe could activate pulsing amber (1 second on 1 second off, for both amber and yellow pulsing lights) in case of failure to stop on set limit, making it visually much easier to understand if there is an issue.
Topic: UI Frameworks SubTopic: General Tags:
2
0
471
1w
Xcode Source Control pull/push hangs indefinitely, terminal Git works normally After Tahoe 26.3 (25D125) Update
Device Details: MBP M2 Pro AND MBP M3 Pro macOS 26.3 (25D125) Xcode Version 26.3, 26.2, 26.1 (I reinstalled all 3 of these after the macOS update) BUG: Xcode hangs indefinitely when performing Source Control operations (Pull or Push) on a Git repository that uses SSH authentication. The same repository works correctly when performing the equivalent Git operations from the Terminal using the Git CLI. The issue appears to be specific to Xcode’s internal Source Control integration. When the operation is triggered from Xcode, the UI shows a spinning progress indicator and never completes. Terminal Git commands (git fetch, git pull, git push) complete normally using the same SSH key and repository. A hang sample taken during the issue shows the Xcode main thread blocked in Source Control authentication and fingerprint handling code paths, including: IDESourceControlUIHandler IDESourceControlFingerprintManager handleAuthenticationFailure showFingerprintAlertOnWindow This suggests Xcode may be waiting on a Source Control authentication or host fingerprint UI flow that never resolves. SSH connectivity itself is functioning correctly: ssh -T git@bitbucket.org and ssh -T git@github.com both authenticate successfully. git ls-remote, git fetch, git pull, and git push all work correctly from Terminal. No Source Control accounts are configured in Xcode Preferences. Authentication relies entirely on SSH keys. Steps to Reproduce Configure an SSH key for Git access (e.g., Bitbucket or GitHub) and confirm it works via Terminal. Clone or open an existing Git repository that uses SSH (git@host:repo.git). Open the project/workspace in Xcode. In Xcode, attempt a Source Control operation such as: Source Control → Pull Source Control → Push Observe that Xcode displays a spinning progress indicator and does not complete the operation. Logs available on this Feedback Assist ID: FB22146913
9
10
757
1w
How to make app appear in Input Monitoring permissions list (like Accessibility does automatically)?
My app needs both Accessibility and Input Monitoring permissions. Accessibility works as expected — calling AXIsProcessTrusted() automatically adds the app to System Settings > Privacy & Security > Accessibility, and the user just needs to toggle it on. Input Monitoring doesn't behave the same way. I'm calling CGRequestListenEventAccess() and creating a CGEvent.tapCreate(.listenOnly), but the app doesn't reliably appear in the Input Monitoring list. The user opens the pane and sees nothing to enable. What I've tried: CGRequestListenEventAccess() — shows the system prompt once per install, but doesn't always add the app to the list CGEvent.tapCreate(tap: .cgSessionEventTap, place: .headInsertEventTap, options: .listenOnly, ...) — returns nil before Accessibility is granted; after Accessibility is granted, the tap succeeds but the app still may not appear in the Input Monitoring list 3. Calling both after Accessibility is confirmed, with a delay before opening the Settings pane The flow: User grants Accessibility (app appears automatically via AXIsProcessTrusted()) App creates a listen-only CGEventTap (succeeds) App opens x-apple.systempreferences:com.apple.preference.security?Privacy_ListenEvent User sees the Input Monitoring pane but the app is not listed Environment: macOS 15 (Sequoia), signed and notarized app, correct bundle ID, Hardened Runtime with com.apple.security.device.audio-input-monitoring entitlement not set (not applicable — this is for audio, not HID). Question: Is there an API equivalent to AXIsProcessTrusted() that reliably registers an app in the Input Monitoring list? Or is there a specific entitlement, Info.plist key, or sequence of calls required on macOS 14+/15 to ensure the app appears?
1
0
774
1w
How to muse app appear in Input Monitoring permissions list (like Accessibility does automatically)?
My app needs both Accessibility and Input Monitoring permissions. Accessibility works as expected - calling AXIsProcesstrusted() automatically adds the app to System Settings > Privacy & Security > Accessibility, and the user just needs to toggle it on. Input Monitoring doesn't behave the same way. I'm calling CGRequestListenEventAccess() and creating a CGEvent.tapCreate(.listenOnly), but the app doesn't reliably appear in the Input Monitoring list. The user opens the pane and sees nothing to enable. What I've tried: CGRequestListenEventAccess() — shows the system prompt once per install, but doesn't always add the app to the list CGEvet.tapCreate(tsp: .cgSessionEventTap, place: .headInsertEventTap, options: listenOnly, ...) — returns nil before Accessibility is granted; after Accessibility is granted, the tap succeeds but the app still may not appear in the Input Monitoring list Calling both after Accessibility is confirmed, with a delay before opening the Settings pane The flow: User grants Accessibility (app appears automatically via AXIsProcessTrusted()) App creates a listen-only CGEventTap (succeeds) App opens x-apple.systempreferences:com.apple.preferences.security?Privacy_ListenEvent User sees the Input Monitoring pane but the app is not listed Environment: macOS 15, signed and notarized app, correct bundle ID, Hardened Runtime with com.apple.security.device.audio-input-monitoring entitlement not set (not applicable). Is there an API equivalent to AXIsProcessTrusted() that reliably registers an app in the Input Monitoring list? Or is there a specific entitlement, Info.plist key, or sequence of calls required on macOS 14+/15 to ensure the app appears?
1
0
712
1w
Logon to Mac OS with Dev Account which is Account Holder
I'm a solo developer and owner of my companies account. I'm trying to sign on to my Mac so I can use my developer account to get a certificate for wallet use and to select the correct developer account for applications in Xcode. I'm am brand new to all this so apologize if I'm missing the simple solution. I'm not able to edit the roles of my developer account but being an Admin I should already have all the necessary access...I think. I get an error when trying to logon as a work account: Searching for the long error doesn't provide a solution in the forum or through search engines. AI says to check the roles.
0
0
154
1w
Wait Time for Siri AI waitlist
There seems to be a lack of clarity about how this Siri AI rollout is working. Does the indexing have anything to do with getting taken off the waitlist, or are they completely separate? Also, what is the expected wait time and has anyone gotten the new Siri after the initial wave of approvals (after 4 hours after the keynote)? The waitlist is extremely slow compared to the initial Apple Intelligence waitlist from a couple of years ago.
Replies
6
Boosts
4
Views
646
Activity
1m
Can macOS 27 VMs be run on older versions of macOS?
As the title says, I'd like to run a macOS 27 VM on my Mac (the host is on macOS 26.5.1) in order to test my apps without having to update my host to a beta. My virtualization app of choice (VirtualBuddy) fails on installation when I use the restore image for macOS 27.0 (26A5353q) from the developer website. The developer of VirtualBuddy believes this is a macOS limitation (https://github.com/insidegui/VirtualBuddy/discussions/683). (I filed FB22977958, but I'm not sure if they filed their own bug.) Is there a workaround? It'd be very nice to have access to this during WWDC week. Usually I'd look for device support files on the developer website for download and/or install the Xcode beta first, but I've already installed the Xcode beta and there don't seem to be any device support files available.
Replies
1
Boosts
1
Views
87
Activity
1h
macOS 27 Golden Gate: com.apple.spaces plist restructured — 'Monitors' key replaced by 'SpacesDisplayConfiguration', breaking third-party window managers (FB23017010)
I'm building a window layout manager that saves and restores window positions across Spaces when switching between display configurations (laptop / docked 3-monitor / Vision Pro). Spencer 1.4.4 handles this today but broke on Golden Gate beta with "Cannot detect number of Spaces." I built a diagnostic probe to find the root cause. FINDINGS (macOS 27.0 Build 26A5353q): CGSPrivate symbols — all intact and functional: CGSMainConnectionID, CGSCopySpaces, CGSGetWindowWorkspace, CGSMoveWindowsToManagedSpace all resolve via dlsym and work correctly. CGSCopySpaces(mask=7) returns 14 valid space IDs. This is NOT the source of the breakage. com.apple.spaces plist — structure changed in Golden Gate: The top-level 'Monitors' key is gone. It has moved to: SpacesDisplayConfiguration → Management Data → Monitors New top-level keys: [SpacesDisplayConfiguration, app-bindings, spans-displays] This IS the root cause. Spencer's parser looks for 'Monitors', finds nothing, and fails. One-line fix once confirmed stable. CGSGetWindowWorkspace returns Space ID 0 for windows set to 'all desktops'. Valid space IDs in this session are 30, 15, 14, 12, 11, 10 — so 0 appears to be a sentinel value for that condition. Full probe output: `SpacesProbe v1.0 — WWDC 2026 Developer Lab ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ System: Version 27.0 (Build 26A5353q) Date: 2026-06-09 21:41:33 +0000 ── PUBLIC API (stable, no entitlements needed) ──────────── ✅ CGWindowListCopyWindowInfo: 17 on-screen windows found ✅ CGGetActiveDisplayList: 1 active display(s) ✅ Accessibility (AXIsProcessTrusted): GRANTED ✅ AXUIElement read: 'Cursor Pro' @ 1427,906 438×438 ✅ AXUIElement write: SUCCESS (nudged window +1px and restored — non-destructive) ── com.apple.spaces PLIST (what Spencer reads to understand Space topology) Path: /Users/csj/Library/Preferences/com.apple.spaces.plist ✅ Plist file exists ✅ Plist readable and deserializable ✅ Monitors in plist: 8 ✅ Total spaces found: 14 Top-level keys: [SpacesDisplayConfiguration, app-bindings, spans-displays] ⚡ GOLDEN GATE: 'Monitors' replaced by 'SpacesDisplayConfiguration' SpacesDisplayConfiguration sub-keys: [Management Data, Space Properties] Monitors (under Management Data): 8 Monitor 0: 14 space(s) ⚠️ 'Monitors' key gone in Golden Gate — moved to SpacesDisplayConfiguration. Spencer parser needs update to read new key. → These anomalies cause Spencer 1.4.4 to report → "Cannot detect number of Spaces" on Golden Gate beta. ── CGSPrivate BRIDGE (private API — the only path to Space assignment) Resolution via dlsym — nil = symbol removed from this OS build ✅ CGSMainConnectionID ✅ CGSCopySpaces ✅ CGSGetWindowWorkspace ✅ CGSMoveWindowsToManagedSpace Connection ID: 3175291 ✅ CGSCopySpaces(mask=7): 14 spaces → 30, 15, 14, 12, 11, 10 ✅ CGSGetWindowWorkspace(wid=99): Space ID = 0 ── SUMMARY ───────────────────────────────────────────────── ✅ Window enumeration (CGWindowListCopyWindowInfo): WORKS ✅ Window position read/write (AXUIElement): WORKS ✅ Display topology (CGGetActiveDisplayList): WORKS ❌ com.apple.spaces plist parsing: BROKEN (1 anomalies) ✅ CGSPrivate Space management symbols: ALL PRESENT Feedback: feedbackassistant.apple.com FB23017010QUESTIONS: Is the new SpacesDisplayConfiguration.Management Data.Monitors path stable and intended for use by third-party tools, or still an implementation detail subject to change? Is Space ID 0 from CGSGetWindowWorkspace the stable sentinel for 'window assigned to all desktops', or is there a proper API for detecting that condition? Is there an entitlement (com.apple.private.spaces or equivalent) that can be granted to productivity tools distributed outside the App Store for Space management? What is the intended supported mechanism for a third-party app to save and restore window Space assignments on macOS? Feedback: FB23017010
Replies
0
Boosts
0
Views
7
Activity
2h
macOS 27 Beta 1 Install Failure
Hello, I'm unable to install macOS 27 Beta 1 on relatively clean test system - 15" MacBook Air M4 16GB RAM. Error from installer log: Jun 9 09:55:29 COMPUTERNAME osinstallersetupd[11696]: Operation queue failed with error: Error Domain=com.apple.OSInstallerSetup.error Code=1007 "An error occurred preparing the update." UserInfo={NSLocalizedRecoverySuggestion=Failed to personalize the software update. Please try again., NSLocalizedDescription=An error occurred preparing the update., NSUnderlyingError=0xbdbf93f30 {Error Domain=SUMacControllerError Code=7723 "[SUMacControllerErrorPreflightPersonalizeFailed=7723] Failed to perform PreflightPersonalize operation: [MobileSoftwareUpdateErrorDomain(MSU):MSU_ERR_PERSONALIZATION_FAILURE(2)_1_MobileSoftwareUpdateErrorDomain(MSU):MSU_ERR_GLOBAL_TICKET_INVALID(53)]" UserInfo={NSLocalizedDescription=Failed to personalize the software update. Please try again., SUMacControllerErrorIndicationsMask=0, NSDebugDescription=[SUMacControllerErrorPreflightPersonalizeFailed=7723] Failed to perform PreflightPersonalize operation: [MobileSoftwareUpdateErrorDomain(MSU):MSU_ERR_PERSONALIZATION_FAILURE(2)_1_MobileSoftwareUpdateErrorDomain(MSU):MSU_ERR_GLOBAL_TICKET_INVALID(53)], NSUnderlyingError=0xbdbf93b10 {Error Domain=MobileSoftwareUpdateErrorDomain Code=2 "Could not personalize boot/firmware bundle." UserInfo={NSUnderlyingError=0xbdbf93d80 {Error Domain=MobileSoftwareUpdateErrorDomain Code=53 "Global ticket failed to verify" UserInfo=0xbdbfd2be0 (not displayed)}, NSLocalizedDescription=Could not personalize boot/firmware bundle., target_update=26A5353q}}}}} Not sure if anyone else has experienced this error?
Replies
2
Boosts
1
Views
115
Activity
4h
Charging Limit misalignment, 80% or 94%?
Hello Apple, I have been facing an issue with charging, although I have beta updates off, but I faced an issue that in my opinion should show pulsing Amber on MagSafe, like I mentioned in my other thread. The MagSafe was glowing amber. Ok, can’t be on 80% yet. I opened the lid, and I found something I never expected: Although it was supposed to stop on 80%, it continued to 94% with no user notification. This happens every once in a while, but isn’t extremely rare. Last time this happened was about a week after macOS 26.5 was launched. I was running macOS 26.5 when this occurred Please consider this as an issue that needs to be fixed, and one of the ways is the MagSafe update, so the user at least knows something is wrong in case something like this ever happens. Please ask me for more information regarding this issue if needed. I am ready to mark the other post as answered if this gets a good reply, and keep in mind that I am conscious of what im doing, so please give this a good read and reply. Please do not count this as spam, I am only doing this to get it fixed, it may seem like a never reported before issue, but it’s still a real one. I am sorry that my previous replies on the forums were useless, and I promise to not reply to posts I don’t know about anymore. I am not a trained developer, and I hope you accept the apology. Thanks, Alyaman
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
21
Activity
7h
Apple AUGraphicEQ dead-lock
Hi, I encounter a dead-lock with Apple AUGraphicEQ. I have attached backtrace: thread #44, name = 'com.apple.audio.toolbox.AUScheduledParameterRefresher' frame #0: 0x0000000182059bb0 libsystem_kernel.dylib`semaphore_wait_trap + 8 frame #1: 0x000000018e9e7e00 caulk`caulk::semaphore::timed_wait(double) + 224 frame #2: 0x000000018e9e7cac caulk`caulk::concurrent::details::worker_thread::run() + 32 frame #3: 0x000000018e9e794c caulk`void* caulk::thread_proxy<std::__1::tuple<caulk::thread::attributes, void (caulk::concurrent::details::worker_thread::*)(), std::__1::tuple<caulk::concurrent::details::worker_thread*>>>(void*) + 96 frame #4: 0x000000018209dc58 libsystem_pthread.dylib`_pthread_start + 136 regards, Joël
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
413
Activity
9h
MagSafe charging light problem
Dear Apple, It looks likes Apple like my new idea, and a lot. I know this as Apple always want their things to be easily understandable, and for MagSafe to be understandable it has to mimic macOS. I got an unreliable reply for the first post, just a person telling me I’m in the wrong place for this. The MagSafe is amazing, but everything needs to be upgraded in some way or the other, DTS engineers are saying that developer forums are for developing, not feedback. So here I am, developing the MagSafe wire, as I would by now rather get a third-party MagSafe wire if mine possibly breaks. $49. This is the price tag for an official MagSafe wire. If it can’t show anything but charging and charged, it’s something that must be reproduced. We have the hardware, we have the red and green diodes in the MagSafe, we just need to turn both of them on to make yellow. We have the hardware, and physics is helping us by saying: “Red + green light = yellow light.” This isn’t as complicated as π, so please implement it and let over 100 million users feel that MagSafe is finally worth the price. It is extremely simple, no new tests, no new safety certifications, just a new code you can forget about once released. To make things as easy as possible, here is the code, you can inspect it and test it, it should be OK. (THIS CODE IS TO SHOW THE BASE OF THE IDEA, PLEASE DONT COPY-PASTE, DOUBLE CHECK IT FIRST. Consider that I didn’t code this myself, I got help. Don’t expect any code from me to be mine) #include <stdbool.h> #include <stdint.h> typedef enum { MODEL_AIR, MODEL_PRO } MacModel; typedef enum { LED_OFF, LED_SOLID_AMBER, LED_SOLID_YELLOW, LED_SOLID_GREEN, LED_PULSING_AMBER, LED_PULSING_YELLOW } LEDState; uint32_t current_cycle_seconds = 0; MacModel get_mac_model(void); uint8_t get_battery_soc(void); uint8_t get_charge_limit(void); uint32_t get_charger_wattage(void); bool check_hardware_faults(void); void apply_led_hardware_state(LEDState state, bool pin_high); void update_magsafe_led(void) { MacModel model = get_mac_model(); uint8_t soc = get_battery_soc(); uint8_t limit = get_charge_limit(); uint32_t wattage = get_charger_wattage(); bool overcharge_fault = (soc > (limit + 2)); bool critical_error = check_hardware_faults() || overcharge_fault; bool slow_charger = false; if (model == MODEL_AIR && wattage < 30) { slow_charger = true; } else if (model == MODEL_PRO && wattage < 70) { slow_charger = true; } LEDState normal_state; if (soc >= 90 || soc >= limit) { normal_state = LED_SOLID_GREEN; } else if (soc >= 50) { normal_state = LED_SOLID_YELLOW; } else { normal_state = LED_SOLID_AMBER; } LEDState active_state = normal_state; bool should_pulse = false; if (current_cycle_seconds < 10) { if (critical_error) { active_state = LED_PULSING_AMBER; should_pulse = true; } else if (slow_charger) { active_state = LED_PULSING_YELLOW; should_pulse = true; } } bool led_pin_high = true; if (should_pulse) { if (current_cycle_seconds % 2 != 0) { led_pin_high = false; } } apply_led_hardware_state(active_state, led_pin_high); current_cycle_seconds++; if (current_cycle_seconds >= 20) { current_cycle_seconds = 0; } } (THIS CODE IS TO SHOW THE BASE OF THE IDEA, PLEASE DONT COPY-PASTE, DOUBLE CHECK IT FIRST. Consider that I didn’t code this myself, I got help. Don’t expect any code from me to be mine) This should show: Pulsing Amber for critical issues Pulsing yellow for slow chargers, under 30w for Macbook air and if under 70w for Macbook pro. Pulses for 10 seconds, and shows the light of the battery percentage for 10 seconds. Amber: 0-50% battery Yellow: 50-90% battery Green: 90%+ battery or reached charging limit. Please consider this code, I prefer a reply if possible to keep track of the new MagSafe update. macOS is amazing, but there are always final touches to be added, and if the hardware can be as similar as possible to the software, this is what brings understanding the battery alive, and apple has always wanted macOS to be as understandable as possible, why not the wire as well? If you need any extra information for the MagSafe, feel free to reply to me on the forum, I will try replying as soon as possible. Let the MagSafe glow. Let it show a yellow. It’s WWDC, and here I am right here. Let 2026 be the year where MagSafe is the most understandable yet, and let the yellow color come alive to MagSafe. Please consider it another chance to get a fresh, serious and realistic start to this. I am more than ready to mark the other post as answered if I get a realistic, understandable and useful reply to this. I apologize if my previous responses weren't very useful; I am not a formally trained engineer, but I wanted to show my idea the best way I could. May I please get a proper reply? Im extremely sorry for my previous replies that lost me reputation, but I promise I won’t reply to other posts from now on. May I please get a proper reply? May my idea get supported? May MagSafe feel as good as the magnetic “snap”? Please keep in mind that im in developer forums to develop the MagSafe wire, and as the DTS engineer stated in their reply: “ These forums are for questions about developing software and accessories for Apple platforms. If this is the case then feel free to provide more information,” In this thread here. There I am. Developing an accessory. MagSafe. I have been using macOS for about a year now, I noticed this flaw since a long time, and here I am, getting it out and loud to Apple in WWDC. Please do not count this as spam, or a repost of my original idea, I am conscious of what im currently doing, so please give this a good read and a caring, useful reply. I really hope you consider this and make MagSafe stand out, alongside the MacBook Neo. It was amazing. Unstoppable. But why not the MagSafe be as well? All the best, Alyaman
Topic: Design SubTopic: General Tags:
Replies
0
Boosts
0
Views
28
Activity
10h
Can APNs wake a sleeping Mac for a third-party app?
I'm building a macOS app and trying to confirm whether there's a way for me to remotely wake a Mac so my app can do a small amount of work (using APNs silent notifications or any other technique). Here's what I want to happen: User runs my app on their Mac User puts the Mac to sleep (Apple menu > Sleep) 30 minutes later, my server sends a push notification (content-available: 1, apns-push-type: background, apns-priority: 5) via APNs to the Mac Note: Power Nap and Wake for Network Access are enabled The Mac dark-wakes, delivers the notification to my app via application(_:didReceiveRemoteNotification:), my app gets ~30 seconds to open a WebSocket, do some work, and return Mac goes back to sleep So far, I've been able to send silent push notifications to a sleeping Mac, but my app only gets to take action on them after the Mac has been awoken manually. I've tried both silent pushes (content-available: 1, priority 5) and alert pushes (priority 10) with the same result. After trying every option I can find, I don't believe notifications can wake a sleeping Mac and allow my third-party app to process data, but I really want to be wrong. Can anyone confirm whether or not this is possible?
Replies
3
Boosts
0
Views
132
Activity
1d
macOS 26.5.1: Age Range Setup Assistant pane cannot be skipped with MDM SetupAssistant payload outside ADE
Hello, I’m trying to clarify whether the new Age Range / Age Assurance Setup Assistant pane can be skipped on macOS when using a standard MDM Device Enrollment flow, not Automated Device Enrollment. Environment: Platform: macOS Tahoe 26.5.1 Enrollment type: MDM Device Enrollment, not ADE / DEP MDM: Microsoft Intune Profile deployment channel: Device profile Payload type: com.apple.SetupAssistant.managed Key used: SkipSetupItems Skip items tested: AgeAssurance AgeBasedSafetySettings The configuration profile installs successfully on the Mac as a device profile. I can confirm that the com.apple.SetupAssistant.managed payload is present on the device and includes the tested SkipSetupItems values. However, the Age Range / age-related Setup Assistant pane is still shown to the user. Example payload content: <dict> <key>PayloadType</key> <string>com.apple.SetupAssistant.managed</string> <key>PayloadIdentifier</key> <string>com.example.setupassistant.managed</string> <key>PayloadUUID</key> <string>REDACTED-UUID</string> <key>PayloadVersion</key> <integer>1</integer> <key>PayloadDisplayName</key> <string>Managed Setup Assistant</string> <key>SkipSetupItems</key> <array> <string>AgeAssurance</string> <string>AgeBasedSafetySettings</string> </array> </dict> What I expected: When the com.apple.SetupAssistant.managed payload is installed as a device-level profile and includes the relevant age-related skip keys, the Age Range / Age Assurance pane should be skipped during Setup Assistant, or Apple documentation should state clearly that this pane can only be skipped in ADE. What actually happens: The profile installs, but the Age Range / age-related Setup Assistant pane still appears to the user on macOS 26.5.1. Documentation ambiguity: Apple’s Setup Assistant payload documentation says: The supported payload identifier is com.apple.SetupAssistant.managed Supported operating systems/channels include macOS device and macOS user Supported enrollment methods include User Enrollment, Device Enrollment, and Automated Device Enrollment SkipSetupItems is a list of Setup Assistant panes that can be skipped Apple’s macOS Tahoe 26 enterprise notes say: “The new Age Range setup pane is automatically skipped for devices using Automated Device Enrollment.” That wording clearly mentions ADE, but I have not found documentation that explicitly states whether the Age Range pane is intentionally unsupported for non-ADE macOS MDM enrollment, or whether there is a separate skip key required for macOS. Third-party MDM/tooling documentation appears to reference the following newer skip keys: AgeAssurance AgeBasedSafetySettings However, it is unclear whether those keys are supported on macOS, iOS/iPadOS only, ADE only, or all MDM enrollment methods. Questions: Are AgeAssurance and AgeBasedSafetySettings valid SkipSetupItems values on macOS 26.5.1? If yes, are they supported only during Automated Device Enrollment, or should they also work with standard MDM Device Enrollment? If these keys are iOS/iPadOS-only, what is the correct macOS skip item for the Age Range / age-related Setup Assistant pane? Is the Age Range pane intentionally only auto-skipped in ADE on macOS? Should Apple’s public Device Management / SkipKeys documentation be updated to list the correct key names, supported platforms, minimum OS versions, and enrollment requirements? This is important for Mac deployments where devices are enrolled into MDM but are not assigned through Apple Business Manager / Automated Device Enrollment. At the moment, it is difficult to determine whether the behavior is expected, unsupported, or a bug in macOS / Setup Assistant / MDM profile handling. Thanks.
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
152
Activity
2d
Time Machine destination automatically converted to Case-Sensitive APFS in macOS Tahoe?
Mac: MacBook Pro 16-inch (Intel, 2019) macOS: Tahoe 26.5.1 I'm trying to determine whether this is expected behavior or a bug. Setup I purchased a new 2TB SSD to use exclusively for Time Machine. Before configuring Time Machine, I manually erased the SSD in Disk Utility and formatted it as: APFS (non-case-sensitive) Encrypted I specifically did not choose APFS (Case-sensitive). What happened After selecting the SSD as a Time Machine destination and allowing macOS to prepare the disk, I later checked the volume information and found: File System Personality: Case-sensitive APFS and: APFS Volume Disk (Role): Backup Name: Brad Mac Backups SSD (Case-sensitive) The volume appears to have been converted to a dedicated APFS Backup volume and is now reported as case-sensitive. Additional observations After backups complete: tmutil status reports: Running = 0 indicating Time Machine is no longer running. However, Spotlight processes (mds and mds_store) continue accessing the backup volume for many hours afterwards, preventing normal ejection of the SSD. Using: sudo lsof | grep "/Volumes/Brad Mac Backups SSD" shows Spotlight processes holding the drive open. Finder's "Force Eject" works successfully. Questions Is it expected behavior in macOS Tahoe for Time Machine to create a Case-sensitive APFS Backup volume, even when the destination was originally formatted as standard APFS? Has anyone else observed a Time Machine destination changing from APFS (non-case-sensitive) to APFS (Case-sensitive) during setup? Could the case-sensitive APFS format be related to Spotlight continuously indexing the backup volume and preventing normal ejection? Relevant Output diskutil info disk3s2 returns: File System Personality: Case-sensitive APFS and: diskutil apfs list shows: APFS Volume Disk (Role): Backup Name: Brad Mac Backups SSD (Case-sensitive) Mount Point: /Volumes/Brad Mac Backups SSD 1 Any insight would be appreciated, as Apple Support was unable to explain why the backup volume became case-sensitive.
Replies
0
Boosts
0
Views
69
Activity
3d
Orphaned 9GB Simulator Runtime in /System/Library/AssetsV2 - Cannot Delete (SIP protected)
I have an orphaned asset folder taking up 9.13GB located at: /System/Library/AssetsV2/com_apple_MobileAsset_iOSSimulatorRuntime/c0d3fd05106683ba0b3680d4d1afec65f098d700.asset It contains SimulatorRuntimeAsset version 18.5 (Build 22F77). Active Version: My current Xcode setup is using version 26.2 (Build 23C54). I checked the plist files in the directory and found what seems to be the cause of the issue: The "Never Collected" Flag: The Info.plist inside the orphaned asset folder explicitly sets the garbage collection behavior to "NeverCollected": <key>__AssetDefaultGarbageCollectionBehavior</key> <string>NeverCollected</string> The Catalog Mismatch: The master catalog file (com_apple_MobileAsset_iOSSimulatorRuntime.xml) in the parent directory only lists the new version (26.2). Because the old version (18.5) is missing from this XML, Xcode and mobileassetd seem to have lost track of it entirely. What I Have Tried (All Failed) Xcode Components: The version 18.5 does not appear in Settings -> Components, so I cannot delete it via the GUI. Simctl: xcrun simctl list runtimes does not list this version. Running xcrun simctl runtime delete 22F77 fails with: "No runtime disk images or bundles found matching '22F77'." Manual Deletion: sudo rm -rf [path] fails with "Operation not permitted", presumably because /System/Library/AssetsV2 is SIP-protected. Third-party Tools: Apps like DevCleaner do not detect this runtime (likely because they only scan ~/Library or /Library, not /System/Library). Has anyone found a way to force the system (perhaps via mobileassetd or a specific xcrun flag) to re-evaluate this folder and respect a deletion request? I am trying to avoid booting into Recovery Mode just to delete a cache file. Any insights on how AssetsV2 handles these "orphaned" files would be appreciated.
Replies
20
Boosts
8
Views
2.5k
Activity
4d
NWParameters.preferNoProxies ignored for NWConnection when system Automatic Proxy Configuration (PAC) is enabled
We are implementing a Network Extension that uses NETransparentProxyProvider. For browser TCP flows we terminate in the extension and re‑originate traffic with NWConnection. Per documentation, we set NWParameters.preferNoProxies = true on that NWConnection so it should not use the system HTTP/HTTPS proxy configuration, including PAC‑selected explicit proxies. Observation: With System Settings → Network → Proxies → Automatic proxy configuration pointing at a PAC file that returns something like PROXY 127.0.0.1:8888 for relevant traffic, we still see our NWConnection traffic show up at the local explicit proxy as a normal CONNECT host:443 tunnel. That suggests PAC / explicit proxy selection is still being applied to sockets we believed were opted out via preferNoProxies. This is affecting interoperability: the browser may evaluate PAC with a hostname (e.g. a site configured as DIRECT), while a separate NWConnection may be evaluated in a context where the logical host is an IPv4 literal, so the same PAC script can return PROXY for what the user thinks is the “same” destination. We had expected preferNoProxies to remove the second leg from PAC/proxy entirely. Expected: NWConnection with preferNoProxies == true should connect without opening an explicit CONNECT session to the PAC‑configured proxy (unless there is documented behavior that NE‑originated traffic is intentionally exempt from this flag). Actual: Traffic from the NWConnection path still reaches the explicit proxy (we can log CONNECT … on a minimal local proxy). Environment: macOS Tahoe 26.5 (25F71), Network Extension / App Proxy provider, PAC served over local http, Safari as client. Questions: Is preferNoProxies guaranteed to bypass PAC‑selected explicit proxies for NWConnection from Network Extension processes, or are there known exceptions (e.g. certain interfaces, MDM, networkserviceproxy, etc.)? If this is by design, what is the supported way for an NE to open an outbound TCP connection that must not inherit system PAC/proxy?
Replies
2
Boosts
1
Views
148
Activity
5d
macOS Tahoe 26.5 File System
I updated my OS to Tahoe 26.5 several days ago. Now, I'm developing a new macOS application under it. What I notice about it is that it can take the application at several seconds to select a file or a folder with NSSavePanel, NSOpenPanel and .fileImporter. First, I thought it's just my application. But it's not. Preview acts the same. First, a progress wheel keeps rolling several seconds. Then it will disappear, and you won't be able to select a folder for another several seconds. Why do they make it more difficult to use every time they release a new OS version? Why don't Reviewers notice when they test it? Wait for 10 seconds or more just to select a file or a folder? It's disappointing. I wish I could go back to macOS 15.7.
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
140
Activity
6d
Does @IBSegueAction still not work for AppKit relationship segues from NSWindowController?
I’m working on a storyboard-based AppKit application that uses an NSWindowController containing an NSSplitViewController with multiple child view controllers. The hierarchy is roughly: NSWindowController └── NSSplitViewController ├── NSViewController ├── NSViewController └── NSViewController I am trying to provide dependencies during storyboard instantiation using either @IBSegueAction or instantiateInitialController(creator:), rather than configuring everything after initialisation. What I attempted I added custom initialisers to my view controllers so I can pass dependencies at creation time: class SplitViewController: NSSplitViewController { let dependency: Dependency init?(coder: NSCoder, dependency: Dependency) { self.dependency = dependency super.init(coder: coder) } required init?(coder: NSCoder) { print("init(coder:) was called") fatalError("init(coder:) is not supported") } } I then attempted to intercept storyboard instantiation using @IBSegueAction, trying it in both the window controller and the split view controller: @IBSegueAction func makeSplitViewController(_ coder: NSCoder) -> NSSplitViewController? { SplitViewController(coder: coder, dependency: dependency) } I also tried attaching the segue action at different points in the storyboard, but the behaviour did not change. Observed behaviour Regardless of where I place the segue action, AppKit still appears to call: required init?(coder: NSCoder) This means my custom initialiser is never used for the split view controller or its children. Background reference I found this older known issue in the Xcode 11 release notes: “A Segue Action on a relationship segue between a NSWindowController and a View Controller is currently not supported and ignored. (48252727)” This suggests that, at least historically, AppKit relationship segues ignored segue actions entirely. Has this limitation since been fixed in modern Xcode/macOS SDK releases, or are relationship segues involving NSWindowController still incompatible with @IBSegueAction? More generally, what is the intended way to provide dependencies to an NSSplitViewController and its child view controllers in a storyboard-based AppKit application? I am also unclear whether instantiateInitialController(creator:) participates in the creation of container hierarchies like split view controllers, or only top-level controllers.
Replies
0
Boosts
0
Views
160
Activity
1w
In-app purchase fails on Apple Silicon Mac
I'm testing IPhone and iPad Apps on Apple Silicon Macs. When I purchase In-app product in the app on Apple Silicon Mac, the payment receipt is not created, so the purchase fails. In console log, it says it doesn't have permission to write to the file. storekitagent [6913DE38_SK1] Error writing receipt (5095 bytes) to file:///Users/XXXX/Library/Containers/90FE2A60-9FDF-4ECF-848F-CE3D396322CA/Data/StoreKit/sandboxReceipt: Error Domain=NSCocoaErrorDomain Code=513 "You don’t have permission to save the file “sandboxReceipt” in the folder “StoreKit”" UserInfo={NSFilePath=/Users/XXXX/Library/Containers/90FE2A60-9FDF-4ECF-848F-CE3D396322CA/Data/StoreKit/sandboxReceipt, NSUnderlyingError=0x14202c920 {Error Domain=NSPOSIXErrorDomain Code=1 "Operation not permitted"}} The App is using Original API for In-App Purchase written in Objective-C. When I purchase in-app product, the app calls SKPaymentQueue::addPayment. And then it gets paymentQueue:updatedTransactions callback with SKPaymentTransactionStatePurchased. This means that the payment was successful. But the receipt is not created so I can't continue the after process. I'm testing with sandbox in-app purchase. I have tested several times and confirmed that on macOS Monterey 12.2 the receipt is created successfully, but on macOS Ventura 13.2 the receipt isn't created. I think there is something to do with macOS version. Does anyone have any solutions? Here is a very similar thread on apple developer forum. (And there too has no anwsers)  https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/719505
Replies
8
Boosts
0
Views
1.8k
Activity
1w
Charging limit misalignment, 80% limit vs 94% real life battery
I was recently charging my macbook, just like any normal time i do. i expected to see the battery at 80%, but the macbook was hiding a surprise for me. the magsafe glowed amber, so i knew it cant be on 80%, so when i opened the lid, the surprise was a shocking 94%. I didn't know what to expect, but my macbook is running macOS tahoe 26.5, so everything seemed normal to me until: someone please help in fixing this bug, as it isn't the first time this happens to me. please link this to my magsafe 4 idea here, as the magsafe could activate pulsing amber (1 second on 1 second off, for both amber and yellow pulsing lights) in case of failure to stop on set limit, making it visually much easier to understand if there is an issue.
Topic: UI Frameworks SubTopic: General Tags:
Replies
2
Boosts
0
Views
471
Activity
1w
Xcode Source Control pull/push hangs indefinitely, terminal Git works normally After Tahoe 26.3 (25D125) Update
Device Details: MBP M2 Pro AND MBP M3 Pro macOS 26.3 (25D125) Xcode Version 26.3, 26.2, 26.1 (I reinstalled all 3 of these after the macOS update) BUG: Xcode hangs indefinitely when performing Source Control operations (Pull or Push) on a Git repository that uses SSH authentication. The same repository works correctly when performing the equivalent Git operations from the Terminal using the Git CLI. The issue appears to be specific to Xcode’s internal Source Control integration. When the operation is triggered from Xcode, the UI shows a spinning progress indicator and never completes. Terminal Git commands (git fetch, git pull, git push) complete normally using the same SSH key and repository. A hang sample taken during the issue shows the Xcode main thread blocked in Source Control authentication and fingerprint handling code paths, including: IDESourceControlUIHandler IDESourceControlFingerprintManager handleAuthenticationFailure showFingerprintAlertOnWindow This suggests Xcode may be waiting on a Source Control authentication or host fingerprint UI flow that never resolves. SSH connectivity itself is functioning correctly: ssh -T git@bitbucket.org and ssh -T git@github.com both authenticate successfully. git ls-remote, git fetch, git pull, and git push all work correctly from Terminal. No Source Control accounts are configured in Xcode Preferences. Authentication relies entirely on SSH keys. Steps to Reproduce Configure an SSH key for Git access (e.g., Bitbucket or GitHub) and confirm it works via Terminal. Clone or open an existing Git repository that uses SSH (git@host:repo.git). Open the project/workspace in Xcode. In Xcode, attempt a Source Control operation such as: Source Control → Pull Source Control → Push Observe that Xcode displays a spinning progress indicator and does not complete the operation. Logs available on this Feedback Assist ID: FB22146913
Replies
9
Boosts
10
Views
757
Activity
1w
How to make app appear in Input Monitoring permissions list (like Accessibility does automatically)?
My app needs both Accessibility and Input Monitoring permissions. Accessibility works as expected — calling AXIsProcessTrusted() automatically adds the app to System Settings > Privacy & Security > Accessibility, and the user just needs to toggle it on. Input Monitoring doesn't behave the same way. I'm calling CGRequestListenEventAccess() and creating a CGEvent.tapCreate(.listenOnly), but the app doesn't reliably appear in the Input Monitoring list. The user opens the pane and sees nothing to enable. What I've tried: CGRequestListenEventAccess() — shows the system prompt once per install, but doesn't always add the app to the list CGEvent.tapCreate(tap: .cgSessionEventTap, place: .headInsertEventTap, options: .listenOnly, ...) — returns nil before Accessibility is granted; after Accessibility is granted, the tap succeeds but the app still may not appear in the Input Monitoring list 3. Calling both after Accessibility is confirmed, with a delay before opening the Settings pane The flow: User grants Accessibility (app appears automatically via AXIsProcessTrusted()) App creates a listen-only CGEventTap (succeeds) App opens x-apple.systempreferences:com.apple.preference.security?Privacy_ListenEvent User sees the Input Monitoring pane but the app is not listed Environment: macOS 15 (Sequoia), signed and notarized app, correct bundle ID, Hardened Runtime with com.apple.security.device.audio-input-monitoring entitlement not set (not applicable — this is for audio, not HID). Question: Is there an API equivalent to AXIsProcessTrusted() that reliably registers an app in the Input Monitoring list? Or is there a specific entitlement, Info.plist key, or sequence of calls required on macOS 14+/15 to ensure the app appears?
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
774
Activity
1w
How to muse app appear in Input Monitoring permissions list (like Accessibility does automatically)?
My app needs both Accessibility and Input Monitoring permissions. Accessibility works as expected - calling AXIsProcesstrusted() automatically adds the app to System Settings > Privacy & Security > Accessibility, and the user just needs to toggle it on. Input Monitoring doesn't behave the same way. I'm calling CGRequestListenEventAccess() and creating a CGEvent.tapCreate(.listenOnly), but the app doesn't reliably appear in the Input Monitoring list. The user opens the pane and sees nothing to enable. What I've tried: CGRequestListenEventAccess() — shows the system prompt once per install, but doesn't always add the app to the list CGEvet.tapCreate(tsp: .cgSessionEventTap, place: .headInsertEventTap, options: listenOnly, ...) — returns nil before Accessibility is granted; after Accessibility is granted, the tap succeeds but the app still may not appear in the Input Monitoring list Calling both after Accessibility is confirmed, with a delay before opening the Settings pane The flow: User grants Accessibility (app appears automatically via AXIsProcessTrusted()) App creates a listen-only CGEventTap (succeeds) App opens x-apple.systempreferences:com.apple.preferences.security?Privacy_ListenEvent User sees the Input Monitoring pane but the app is not listed Environment: macOS 15, signed and notarized app, correct bundle ID, Hardened Runtime with com.apple.security.device.audio-input-monitoring entitlement not set (not applicable). Is there an API equivalent to AXIsProcessTrusted() that reliably registers an app in the Input Monitoring list? Or is there a specific entitlement, Info.plist key, or sequence of calls required on macOS 14+/15 to ensure the app appears?
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
712
Activity
1w
Logon to Mac OS with Dev Account which is Account Holder
I'm a solo developer and owner of my companies account. I'm trying to sign on to my Mac so I can use my developer account to get a certificate for wallet use and to select the correct developer account for applications in Xcode. I'm am brand new to all this so apologize if I'm missing the simple solution. I'm not able to edit the roles of my developer account but being an Admin I should already have all the necessary access...I think. I get an error when trying to logon as a work account: Searching for the long error doesn't provide a solution in the forum or through search engines. AI says to check the roles.
Replies
0
Boosts
0
Views
154
Activity
1w