At a recent community meeting we were wondering how Apple creates this soft-edge effect around the occlusion cutouts. We see this effect on keyboard cutouts, iPhone cutouts, and in progressive spaces. An example: Notice the soft edged around the occlusion cutout for the keyboard One of our members created some Shader Graph materials to explore soft edges. These work by sending data into the opacity channel of the PreviewSurface node. Unfortunately, the Occlusion Surface nodes lack any sort of input. If you know how to blend these concepts with RealityKit Occlusion, please let us know!

I"m trying to create a simple app for my students that will display .heic images taken with a nikon and them converted to .heic in the photos app. My attempts only result in the QuickLook viewer showing the images in 2d. Any guidance? Here is my ContentView: import SwiftUI import QuickLook struct ContentView: View { @State private var showQuickLook = false @State private var previewURL: URL? = nil // State to store the URL for Quick Look var body: some View { VStack { Button("See it in 3D") { // Set the URL for the file from the bundle and toggle Quick Look presentation if let imageURL = Bundle.main.url(forResource: "Michelia_fuego", withExtension: "heic") { previewURL = imageURL // Set the preview URL if the image is found showQuickLook.toggle() // Toggle to trigger Quick Look presentation } else { print("File not found") // Print error if the file is missing } } .quickLookPreview($previewURL) // Binding to the URL } } } #Preview { ContentView() }

If I update vision pro size then textfield and button are not update as per its new size. Its working on some scren but not in some screen. Please refer below screenshot for your reference,

This restriction causes me to be unable to use Metal to create images and simultaneously use Swift to add UI controls or RealityKit content (without using a window) in immersive mode.

I found that there is such a click-to-expand horizontally and smoothly effect in the system application called "message", which is good. I wonder if I can add a similar effect to my own app. If possible, are there any implementation ideas or examples that I can refer to? Thanks!

Is there any size guidance for the new WidgetKit integration on visionOS? The Widget HIG provides dimensions for all the widget size classes on iOS, iPadOS and watchOS, but has not been updated for visionOS. https://developer.apple.com/design/human-interface-guidelines/widgets My potential widget use case is image based, so I'm looking to better understand the optimal size, resolution etc I would need, particularly for the new visionOS specific extra large widget size.

I'm developing a VisionOS app with bouncing ball physics and struggling to achieve natural bouncing behavior using RealityKit's physics system. Despite following Apple's recommended parameters, the ball loses significant energy on each bounce and doesn't behave like a real basketball, tennis ball, or football would. With identical physics parameters (restitution = 1.0), RealityKit shows significant energy loss. I've had to implement a custom physics system to compensate, but I want to use native RealityKit physics. It's impossible to make it work by applying custom impulses. Ball Physics Setup (Following Apple Forum Recommendations) // From PhysicsManager.swift private func createBallEntityRealityKit() -> Entity { let ballRadius: Float = 0.05 let ballEntity = Entity() ballEntity.name = "bouncingBall" // Mesh and material let mesh = MeshResource.generateSphere(radius: ballRadius) var material = PhysicallyBasedMaterial() material.baseColor = .init(tint: .cyan) material.roughness = .float(0.3) material.metallic = .float(0.8) ballEntity.components.set(ModelComponent(mesh: mesh, materials: [material])) // Physics setup from Apple Developer Forums let physics = PhysicsBodyComponent( massProperties: .init(mass: 0.624), // Seems too heavy for 5cm ball material: PhysicsMaterialResource.generate( staticFriction: 0.8, dynamicFriction: 0.6, restitution: 1.0 // Perfect elasticity, yet still loses energy ), mode: .dynamic ) ballEntity.components.set(physics) ballEntity.components.set(PhysicsMotionComponent()) // Collision setup let collisionShape = ShapeResource.generateSphere(radius: ballRadius) ballEntity.components.set(CollisionComponent(shapes: [collisionShape])) return ballEntity } Ground Plane Physics // From GroundPlaneView.swift let groundPhysics = PhysicsBodyComponent( massProperties: .init(mass: 1000), material: PhysicsMaterialResource.generate( staticFriction: 0.7, dynamicFriction: 0.6, restitution: 1.0 // Perfect bounce ), mode: .static ) entity.components.set(groundPhysics) Wall Physics // From WalledBoxManager.swift let wallPhysics = PhysicsBodyComponent( massProperties: .init(mass: 1000), material: PhysicsMaterialResource.generate( staticFriction: 0.7, dynamicFriction: 0.6, restitution: 0.85 // Slightly less than ground ), mode: .static ) wall.components.set(wallPhysics) Collision Detection // From GroundPlaneView.swift content.subscribe(to: CollisionEvents.Began.self) { event in guard physicsMode == .realityKit else { return } let currentTime = Date().timeIntervalSince1970 guard currentTime - lastCollisionTime > 0.1 else { return } if event.entityA.name == "bouncingBall" || event.entityB.name == "bouncingBall" { let normal = event.collision.normal // Distinguish between wall and ground collisions if abs(normal.y) < 0.3 { // Wall bounce print("Wall collision detected") } else if normal.y > 0.7 { // Ground bounce print("Ground collision detected") } lastCollisionTime = currentTime } } Issues Observed Energy Loss: Despite restitution = 1.0 (perfect elasticity), the ball loses ~20-30% energy per bounce Wall Sliding: Ball tends to slide down walls instead of bouncing naturally No Damping Control: Comments mention damping values but they don't seem to affect the physics Change in mass also doesn't do much. Custom Physics System (Workaround) I've implemented a custom physics system that manually calculates velocities and applies more realistic restitution values: // From BouncingBallComponent.swift struct BouncingBallComponent: Component { var velocity: SIMD3<Float> = .zero var angularVelocity: SIMD3<Float> = .zero var bounceState: BounceState = .idle var lastBounceTime: TimeInterval = 0 var bounceCount: Int = 0 var peakHeight: Float = 0 var totalFallDistance: Float = 0 enum BounceState { case idle case falling case justBounced case bouncing case settled } } Is this energy loss expected behavior in RealityKit, even with perfect restitution (1.0)? Are there additional physics parameters (damping, solver iterations, etc.) that could improve bounce behavior? Would switching to Unity be necessary for more realistic ball physics, or am I missing something in RealityKit? Even in the last video here: https://stepinto.vision/example-code/collisions-physics-physics-material/ bounce of the ball is very unnatural - stops after 3-4 bounces. I apply custom impulses, but then if I have walls around the ball, it's almost impossible to make it look natural. I also saw this post https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/759422 and ball is still not bouncing naturally.

Is it possible to manage the behavior of timeline totally from code? I am exploring the Compose interactive 3D content in Reality Composer Pro sample project after seeing the related video, but the example shows only the use of Behaviors from RCP to activate timelines actions. I was wondering if it is possible to, somehow, retrieve some kind of timeline controller that allows me access to its informations just like the AnimationPlaybackController does with single animations. What I would like to achieve is being able to play/pause/retrieve timestamp from them in order to allow synchronization between different users on SharePlay

Hello all, I saw this interesting VisionOS app: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/splitscreen-multi-display/id6478007837 I was wondering if there was any documentation on the Swift APIs that were used to create this app.

Im just trying to setup some kind of visual on my iPad for testing and play purposes... I tried adding iPad to both APPLE Visual APPS. I get this error for both Building for 'iphoneos', but '12.0' must be >= '18.0'

In some cases, we will put the Apple Vision Pro back on for a short period of time after taking it off, such as less than 1 minute, and want to keep it activte when we take it off so that it can continue to work seamlessly when we put it on again. The current Apple Vision Pro turns off the display and goes to sleep whenever it is been taken off. This feature is also explained in the user guide, to save power, for safety, etc. However, we want a seamless experience! Is it possible to have a screen saver like macOS or iOS, where we can set our own delay time to go sleep? Or is there any API that can be called to prevent going to sleep?

.glassEffect(.regular, in: .rect(cornerRadius: 24)) error; 'glassEffect(_:in:isEnabled:)' is unavailable in visionOS This is not surprising since visionOS already has a native glass interface that formed a model for the other OS's, but this error will create additional overhead for developers creating multi-platform apps that include visionOS.

My app has two Window Groups: Window1 and Window2 Moving Window2 to Window1 will overlay, and I cannot see or interact with Window1. My question is, is there any way that I can make Window1 always on top, and whenever Window2 moves in front of Window1, will it be overlayed instead of Window1?

I would like to integrate the object capture API with a ML model for analysis. So, i will need to get the current frame into CG images for further process. Thanks in advance !

Hi everyone, I’m building a visualization app for VisionPro that uses SharePlay and GroupActivities to explore datasets collaboratively. I’ve successfully implemented the new SharedWorldAnchor feature, and everything works well with nearby, local participants. However, I’m stuck on one point: How can I share a world anchor with remote participants who join via FaceTime as spatial personas? Apple’s demo app (where multiple users move a plane model around) seems to suggest that this is possible. For context, I’m building an immersive app with Metal rendering. Any guidance or examples would be greatly appreciated! Thanks, Jens

Hi, I am trying to stream spatial video in realtime from my iPhone 16. I am able to record spatial video as a file output using: let videoDeviceOutput = AVCaptureMovieFileOutput() However, when I try to grab the raw sample buffer, it doesn't include any spatial information: let captureOutput = AVCaptureVideoDataOutput() //when init camera session.addOutput(captureOutput) captureOutput.setSampleBufferDelegate(self, queue: sessionQueue) //finally func captureOutput(_ output: AVCaptureOutput, didOutput sampleBuffer: CMSampleBuffer, from connection: AVCaptureConnection) { //use sample buffer (but no spatial data available here) } Is this how it's supposed to work or maybe I am missing something? this video: https://developer.apple.com/videos/play/wwdc2023/10071 gives us a clue towards setting up spatial streaming and I've got the backend all ready for 3D HLS streaming. Now I am only stuck at how to send the video stream to my server.

Hello, There are three issues I am running into with a default template project + additional minimal code changes: the Sphere_Left entity always overlaps the Sphere_Right entity. when I release the Sphere_Left entity, it does not remain sticking to the Sphere_Right entity when I release the Sphere_Left entity, it distances itself from the Sphere_Right entity When I manipulate the Sphere_Right entity, these above 3 issues do not occur: I get a correct and expected behavior. These issues are simple to replicate: Create a new project in XCode Choose visionOS -> App, then click Next Name your project, and leave all other options as defaults: Initial Scene: Window, Immersive Space Renderer: RealityKit, Immersive Space: Mixed, then click Next Save you project anywhere... Replace the entire ImmersiveView.swift file with the below code. Run. Try to manipulate the left sphere, you should get the same issues I mentioned above If you restart the project, and manipulate only the right sphere, you should get the correct expected behaviors, and no issues. I am running this in macOS 26, XCode 26, on visionOS 26, all released lately. ImmersiveView Code: // // ImmersiveView.swift // import OSLog import SwiftUI import RealityKit import RealityKitContent struct ImmersiveView: View { private let logger = Logger(subsystem: "com.testentitiessticktogether", category: "ImmersiveView") @State var collisionBeganUnfiltered: EventSubscription? var body: some View { RealityView { content in // Add the initial RealityKit content if let immersiveContentEntity = try? await Entity(named: "Immersive", in: realityKitContentBundle) { content.add(immersiveContentEntity) // Add manipulation components setupManipulationComponents(in: immersiveContentEntity) collisionBeganUnfiltered = content.subscribe(to: CollisionEvents.Began.self) { collisionEvent in Task { @MainActor in handleCollision(entityA: collisionEvent.entityA, entityB: collisionEvent.entityB) } } } } } private func setupManipulationComponents(in rootEntity: Entity) { logger.info("\(#function) \(#line) ") let sphereNames = ["Sphere_Left", "Sphere_Right"] for name in sphereNames { guard let sphere = rootEntity.findEntity(named: name) else { logger.error("\(#function) \(#line) Failed to find \(name) entity") assertionFailure("Failed to find \(name) entity") continue } ManipulationComponent.configureEntity(sphere) var manipulationComponent = ManipulationComponent() manipulationComponent.releaseBehavior = .stay sphere.components.set(manipulationComponent) } logger.info("\(#function) \(#line) Successfully set up manipulation components") } private func handleCollision(entityA: Entity, entityB: Entity) { logger.info("\(#function) \(#line) Collision between \(entityA.name) and \(entityB.name)") guard entityA !== entityB else { return } if entityB.isAncestor(of: entityA) { logger.debug("\(#function) \(#line) \(entityA.name) already under \(entityB.name); skipping reparent") return } if entityA.isAncestor(of: entityB) { logger.info("\(#function) \(#line) Skip reparent: \(entityA.name) is an ancestor of \(entityB.name)") return } reparentEntities(child: entityA, parent: entityB) entityA.components[ParticleEmitterComponent.self]?.burst() } private func reparentEntities(child: Entity, parent: Entity) { let childBounds = child.visualBounds(relativeTo: nil) let parentBounds = parent.visualBounds(relativeTo: nil) let maxEntityWidth = max(childBounds.extents.x, parentBounds.extents.x) let childPosition = child.position(relativeTo: nil) let parentPosition = parent.position(relativeTo: nil) let currentDistance = distance(childPosition, parentPosition) child.setParent(parent, preservingWorldTransform: true) logger.info("\(#function) \(#line) Set \(child.name) parent to \(parent.name)") child.components.remove(ManipulationComponent.self) logger.info("\(#function) \(#line) Removed ManipulationComponent from child \(child.name)") if currentDistance > maxEntityWidth { let direction = normalize(childPosition - parentPosition) let newPosition = parentPosition + direction * maxEntityWidth child.setPosition(newPosition - parentPosition, relativeTo: parent) logger.info("\(#function) \(#line) Adjusted position: distance was \(currentDistance), now \(maxEntityWidth)") } } } fileprivate extension Entity { func isAncestor(of other: Entity) -> Bool { var current: Entity? = other.parent while let node = current { if node === self { return true } current = node.parent } return false } } #Preview(immersionStyle: .mixed) { ImmersiveView() .environment(AppModel()) }

I want to create a screenshot (static image) of the current view on the Apple Vision Pro using written code in visionOS. Unfortunately, I currently can’t find a way to achieve this. The only option I’ve found so far is through Reality Composer Pro. However, since I want to accomplish this directly through code, this approach is not an option for me.

iOS currently restricts background Bluetooth advertising and scanning in order to preserve battery life and protect user privacy. While these restrictions serve important purposes, they also limit legitimate use cases where users have explicitly opted in to proximity-based experiences. The core challenge is that modern social applications need a way to detect when users are physically present at the same location or event without requiring every participant to keep their app in the foreground. Under the current system, background BLE advertising is heavily throttled and can only transmit a limited payload, background scanning intervals are sparse and unpredictable, peer-to-peer proximity detection cannot be maintained reliably when apps are in the background, and Background App Refresh is non-deterministic, making any kind of time-based proximity validation impossible. A proposed enhancement would be to introduce an “Enhanced Proximity Permission.” This would allow developers to enable reliable background BLE advertising and scanning for declared time windows, such as a maximum of eight hours. It would also allow devices running the same app to detect each other’s proximity using ephemeral, rotating identifiers that preserve privacy, with clear user consent and prominent indicators whenever the feature is active. Unlocking this capability would open up new categories of applications. Live events could offer automatic attendance tracking at concerts, conferences, or sports venues. Retail environments could support opt-in foot traffic analysis and dwell-time insights. Social apps could allow users to find friends at festivals, campuses, or other large venues. Safety applications could extend to crowd density monitoring and contact tracing beyond COVID-era needs. Gaming could offer real-world multiplayer experiences based on physical proximity, and transportation providers could verify rideshare pickups or measure public transit flows automatically. Privacy safeguards would remain central. Permissions would be time-boxed and expire after an event or session. A mandatory visual indicator would be displayed whenever proximity tracking is active. A user-facing dashboard would show all apps granted enhanced proximity access. Permissions would automatically be revoked after a period of non-use, and only ephemeral tokens not permanent identifiers would be broadcast. The industry impact would be significant. With this enhancement, iOS could power the next generation of location-aware social platforms while maintaining Apple’s leadership in privacy through explicit user control and transparency. Current alternatives, such as requiring users to keep apps in the foreground or deploying dedicated hardware beacons, produce poor user experiences and constrain innovation in spatial computing and social applications. Can anyone from Apple consider this change? Having to buy iBeacons is brutal and means slower adoption. Please reconsider this for users who opt in.

I have a visionOS 2 project created on Xcode 16, when I updated to Xcode 26 beta5, I can't build it any more, every time it stuck in process like the picture shows below: Already tried many methods to fix this issue, such as clear build folders, but don't work. MacBook Air M2 / MacOS 26 beta5 / Xcode 26 beta5