This issue affects camera session behavior and UI integration. I would like to request improved support or clarification regarding the simultaneous use of ARFaceTrackingConfiguration and AVCaptureMultiCamSession. Currently, when attempting to use both: Front camera (TrueDepth) for gaze tracking using ARFaceTrackingConfiguration Rear camera for live preview using AVCaptureMultiCamSession the ARKit face tracking stops updating, or the application becomes unstable (e.g., camera preview turns white or the app crashes). Steps to Reproduce: Start ARSession using ARFaceTrackingConfiguration (front camera) Start AVCaptureMultiCamSession using rear camera Overlay both outputs in a single UI Observe that ARKit tracking stops or camera preview becomes invalid Expected Result: ARKit face tracking continues updating while the rear camera is active. Actual Result: ARKit tracking stops updating, and camera output may become unstable or crash. Use Case: This functionality is important for accessibility and educational applications. For example, users can control UI via gaze input (front camera) while observing real-world objects using the rear camera. Request: Support simultaneous use of ARFaceTrackingConfiguration and AVCaptureMultiCamSession, or Improve resource sharing between TrueDepth and rear cameras, or Provide clear documentation about current limitations This feature would significantly enhance accessibility applications on iPad. Attachment: A photo is attached showing the issue on a real iPad device. In the image, the camera preview becomes white while the application is running, indicating unstable behavior when both ARKit face tracking and rear camera capture are active simultaneously.

Among Japanese end users, audio issues during screen recording—primarily in game applications—have become a topic of discussion. We have confirmed that the trigger for this issue is highly likely to be related to changes to IOBufferDuration. When using setPreferredIOBufferDuration and the IOBufferDuration is set to a value smaller than the default, audio problems occur in the recorded screen capture video. Audio playback is performed using AudioUnit (RemoteIO). https://developer.apple.com/documentation/avfaudio/avaudiosession/setpreferrediobufferduration(_:)?language=objc This issue was not observed on iOS 18, and it appears to have started occurring after upgrading to iOS 26. We provide an audio middleware solution, and we had incorporated changes to IOBufferDuration into our product to achieve low-latency audio playback. As a result, developers using our product as well as their end users are being affected by this issue. We kindly request that this issue be investigated and addressed in a future update. “This document has been translated by AI. The original text is included below for reference.” 日本のエンドユーザー間で主にゲームアプリケーションにおける画面収録時の音声の問題が話題になっています。 こちらの症状のトリガーが、IOBufferDurationの変更によるものである可能性が高いことを確認しました。 setPreferredIOBufferDurationを使用し、IOBufferDurationがデフォルトより小さい状態の時、画面収録された動画の音声に問題が発生することをしています。 音声の再生にはAudioUnit(RemoteIO)を使用しています。 https://developer.apple.com/documentation/avfaudio/avaudiosession/setpreferrediobufferduration(_:)?language=objc iOS 18ではこのような問題は確認されておらず、iOS26になってから問題が発生しているようです。 私たちはオーディオミドルウェアを提供しており、低遅延の再生のためにIOBufferDurationの変更を製品に組み込んでいました。 そのため、弊社製品をご利用いただいている開発者およびエンドユーザーの皆様がこの不具合の影響を受けています。 こちらの不具合の調査及び修正対応を検討いただけますでしょうか。

I’m working with FairPlay offline licenses using AVContentKeySession and ran into behavior that I cannot find documented. I am explicitly calling: contentKeySession.processContentKeyRequest( withIdentifier: identifier as NSString, initializationData: nil, options: nil ) Expected behavior I expect that each call to processContentKeyRequest will eventually result in the delegate callback: contentKeySession(_:didProvide:) Observed behavior If I call processContentKeyRequest with a new identifier, everything works as expected: didProvide is called I complete the request successfully However, if I call processContentKeyRequest again with the same identifier that was already processed earlier, then: No delegate callbacks are triggered at all The session does not appear to be blocked or stuck If I issue another request with a different identifier, it is processed normally So the behavior looks like the session is silently ignoring repeated requests for the same content key identifier. Important context This is not a concurrency issue — the session continues processing other requests This is reproducible consistently I am not using renewExpiringResponseData(for:) because I do not have a live AVContentKeyRequest at the time of retry Use case My use case is offline playback with periodically refreshed licenses. The app can stay alive for a long time (days/weeks), and I need to proactively refresh licenses before expiration. In this scenario: I only have the contentKeyIdentifier I do not have a current AVContentKeyRequest Calling processContentKeyRequest again for the same identifier does not trigger any delegate callbacks Questions Is this behavior expected — that AVContentKeySession ignores repeated processContentKeyRequest calls for the same identifier? What is the recommended way to re-fetch or refresh a license when: I only have the identifier I do not have a current AVContentKeyRequest I need to refresh proactively (not just in response to playback) What is the intended approach in this case? Maybe to create a new AVContentKeySession to force a new request cycle? Or something else? Is there any way to guarantee that a call to processContentKeyRequest will result in a delegate callback, or is it expected that it may be ignored in some cases? Any clarification on the intended lifecycle of AVContentKeySession and how repeated requests should be handled would be greatly appreciated.

Feedback: PHBackgroundResourceUploadExtension is never scheduled when iCloud Photos is enabled Summary PHBackgroundResourceUploadExtension's init() and process() methods are never called by the system when iCloud Photos is enabled on the device, even though setUploadJobExtensionEnabled(true) succeeds and uploadJobExtensionEnabled returns true. Environment iOS 26.4 (both devices) Xcode 26.x Tested on iPhone 17 Pro (primary device, 10,000+ photos) and an older iPhone (development device, 200+ photos) Same build deployed to both devices Full photo library access (.authorized) on both devices Steps to Reproduce Create an app with a PHBackgroundResourceUploadExtension (ExtensionKit, extension point com.apple.photos.background-upload) Enable iCloud Photos on the device (Settings > Photos > iCloud Photos) In the host app, request .readWrite photo library authorization and receive .authorized Call PHPhotoLibrary.shared().setUploadJobExtensionEnabled(true) — succeeds without error Verify PHPhotoLibrary.shared().uploadJobExtensionEnabled == true Wait for the system to schedule the extension (tested overnight, with device on charger + WiFi) Expected Behavior The system should call the extension's init() and process() methods to allow the app to create upload jobs, as documented in "Uploading asset resources in the background." Actual Behavior The extension's init() and process() are never called. The extension process is never launched. Investigation via Console.app Using Console.app to monitor system logs on both devices revealed the root cause: When iCloud Photos is DISABLED (extension works correctly): assetsd Checked all submitted library bundles. Result: YES dasd SUBMITTING: com.apple.assetsd.backgroundjobservice.assetresourceuploadextensionrunner:35E7B5 dasd Submitted: ...assetresourceuploadextensionrunner at priority 5 dasd submitTaskRequestWithIdentifier: Submitted BGSystemTask com.apple.assetsd.backgroundjobservice.assetresourceuploadextensionrunner The extension is subsequently launched and init() / process() are called as expected. When iCloud Photos is ENABLED (extension never works): assetsd Checked all submitted library bundles. Result: NO No assetresourceuploadextensionrunner background task is ever submitted to dasd. The extension is never launched. Reproducibility 100% reproducible across two different devices Toggling iCloud Photos off (and waiting for sync to complete) immediately resolves the issue Toggling iCloud Photos on immediately causes the issue to reappear Reinstalling the app does not help The same build works on the same device when iCloud Photos is disabled Impact This effectively makes PHBackgroundResourceUploadExtension unusable for the vast majority of users, as most iPhone users have iCloud Photos enabled. Third-party photo backup apps (Google Photos, Dropbox, OneDrive, etc.) would all be affected by this limitation. The documentation for "Uploading asset resources in the background" does not mention any incompatibility with iCloud Photos being enabled. Requested Resolution Please either: Allow PHBackgroundResourceUploadExtension to be scheduled regardless of iCloud Photos status, or Document this limitation clearly in the API documentation if it is intentional behavior

Hello, I used AVPlayer in my project to play network movie. Most movie could play normally, but I found the sound will disappear sometimes if I play specified 4K video network stream. The video will continue playing but audio stops after video is played for a while. If I pause player and then resume, the sound will be back but disappeared again after several seconds Check AVPlayerItem status: isPlaybackLikelyToKeepUp` == true isPlaybackBufferEmpty` = false player.volume > 0 According the value above, it seems not cause by empty playback buffer or volume issue. I am so confused for this situation. Movie information Video Format : AVC Format/Info : Advanced Video Codec Format profile : High L5.1 Codec ID : avc1 Codec ID/Info : Advanced Video Coding Bit rate mode : Variable Bit rate : 100.0 Mb/s Width : 3 840 pixels Height : 2 160 pixels Display aspect ratio : 16:9 Frame rate mode : Constant Frame rate : 29.970 (30000/1001) FPS Audio Format : AAC LC Format/Info : Advanced Audio Codec Low Complexity Codec ID : mp4a-40-2 Duration : 5 min 19 s Bit rate mode : Constant Bit rate : 192 kb/s Nominal bit rate : 48.0 kb/s Channel(s) : 2 channels Channel layout : L R Sampling rate : 48.0 kHz Frame rate : 46.875 FPS (1024 SPF) Does anyone know if AVPlayer has this limitations when playing high-bitrate movie streams, and are there any solutions?

We are developing a video streaming app that uses AVContentKeySession with FairPlay Streaming. Our implementation supports both online playback (non-persistable keys) and offline playback (persistable keys). We have observed the following behavior: Once a content key has been obtained for a given Content Key ID, AVContentKeySession does not trigger contentKeySession(_:didProvide:) again for that same Key ID We also attempted to explicitly call processContentKeyRequest(withIdentifier:initializationData:options:) on the session to force a new key request for the same identifier, but this did not result in the delegate callback being fired again. The session appears to consider the key already resolved and silently ignores the request. This means that if a user first plays content online (receiving a non-persistable key), and later wants to download the same content for offline use (requiring a persistable key), the delegate callback is not fired again, and we have no opportunity to request a persistable key. Questions Is this the expected behavior? Specifically, is it by design that AVContentKeySession caches the key for a given Key ID and does not re-request it — even when processContentKeyRequest(withIdentifier:) is explicitly called? Should we use distinct Content Key IDs for persistable vs. non-persistable keys? For example, if the same piece of content can be played both online and offline, is the recommended approach to have the server provide different EXT-X-KEY URIs (and thus different key identifiers) for the streaming and download variants? Is there a supported way to force a fresh key request for a Key ID that has already been resolved — for example, to upgrade from a non-persistable to a persistable key? Environment iOS 18+ AVContentKeySession(keySystem: .fairPlayStreaming) Any guidance on the recommended approach for supporting both streaming and offline playback for the same content would be greatly appreciated.

We have an application that capture audio and video. App captures audio PCM on internal or external microphone and displays audio level on the screen. App was working fine for many years but after iOS 26.4 upgrade, averagePowerLevel and peakHoldLevel are stuck to -120 values. Any suggestion?

I am developing a VoIP app that uses WebRTC inside a WKWebView. Question 1: How can I monitor which audio output device WebRTC is currently using? I want to display this information in the UI for the user . Question 2: How can I change the current audio output device for WebRTC? I am using a JS Bridge to Objective-C code, attempting to change the audio device with the following code: void set_speaker(int n) { session = [AVAudioSession sharedInstance]; NSError *err = nil; if (n == 1) { [session overrideOutputAudioPort:AVAudioSessionPortOverrideSpeaker error:&err]; } else { [session overrideOutputAudioPort:AVAudioSessionPortOverrideNone error:&err]; } } However, this approach does not work. I am testing on an iPhone with iOS 16.7. Is a higher iOS version required?

I am trying to use the new SpeechAnalyzer framework in my Mac app, and am running into an issue for some languages. When I call AssetInstallationRequest.downloadAndInstall() for some languages, it throws an error: Error Domain=SFSpeechErrorDomain Code=1 "transcription.ar asset not found after attempted download." The ".ar" appears to be the language code, which in this case was Arabic. When I call AssetInventory.status(forModules:) before attempting the download, it is giving me a status of "downloading" (perhaps from an earlier attempt?). If this language was completely unsupported, I would expect it to return a status of "unsupported", so I'm not sure what's going on here. For other languages (Polish, for example) SpeechTranscriber.supportedLocale(equivalentTo:) is returning nil, so that seems like a clearly unsupported language. But I can't tell if the languages I'm trying, like Arabic, are supported and something is going wrong, or if this error represents something I can work around. Here's the relevant section of code. The error is thrown from downloadAndInstall(), so I never even get as far as setting up the SpeechAnalyzer itself. private func setUpAnalyzer() async throws { guard let sourceLanguage else { throw Error.languageNotSpecified } guard let locale = await SpeechTranscriber.supportedLocale(equivalentTo: Locale(identifier: sourceLanguage.rawValue)) else { throw Error.unsupportedLanguage } let transcriber = SpeechTranscriber(locale: locale, preset: .progressiveTranscription) self.transcriber = transcriber let reservedLocales = await AssetInventory.reservedLocales if !reservedLocales.contains(locale) && reservedLocales.count == AssetInventory.maximumReservedLocales { if let oldest = reservedLocales.last { await AssetInventory.release(reservedLocale: oldest) } } do { let status = await AssetInventory.status(forModules: [transcriber]) print("status: \(status)") if let installationRequest = try await AssetInventory.assetInstallationRequest(supporting: [transcriber]) { try await installationRequest.downloadAndInstall() } } ...

I'm using the new SpeechAnalyzer framework to detect certain commands and want to improve accuracy by giving context. Seems like AnalysisContext is the solution for this, but couldn't find any usage example. So I want to make sure that I'm doing it right or not. let context = AnalysisContext() context.contextualStrings = [ AnalysisContext.ContextualStringsTag("commands"): [ "set speed level", "set jump level", "increase speed", "decrease speed", ... ], AnalysisContext.ContextualStringsTag("vocabulary"): [ "speed", "jump", ... ] ] try await analyzer.setContext(context) With this implementation, it still gives outputs like "Set some speed level", "It's speed level", etc. Also, is it possible to make it expect number after those commands, in order to eliminate results like "set some speed level to" (instead of two).

I have an application that includes custom artwork for the album cover and text details setup with the MPRemoteCommandCenter.shared() reference. I need the user to have a full featured "now playing" display to see all of this. My experience is that cannot find a set of parameters for AVAudioSession.setCategory() that route audio successfully, and display the full featured now playing deck. If I use .playAndRecord, the audio I send out plays out on the radio. But, the now-playing deck is empty and nothing I do with the command center seems to change that. If I instead use .playback, I cannot use .defaultToSpeaker option which is the only way I've found to cause the "now-playing" navigation button to appear so that the full featured deck will display. But, of course setCategory() fails with an error about .defaultToSpeaker only available with .playAndRecord, so some default or intermediate state is entered and I see the full featured deck, but no audio goes out to the radio. What combination is supposed to be used here and is this more likely a problem with thread use (@MainActor) and/or some ordering of operations that I've overlooked?

I'm developing an audio player app that uses AVAudio​File to read PCM data from various formats. I'm experiencing severe performance issues when seeking in FLAC, while other compressed formats (M4A/AAC) work correctly. I don't intend to use them in my app, but I also tested mp3 files just by curiosity and they also have this issue. Environment: macOS 26 (Tahoe) Xcode 26.3 Apple Silicon (M1) The issue: After setting AVAudio​File​.frame​Position to a position mid-file, the subsequent call to AVAudio​File​.read(into​:frame​Count:) blocks for an unreasonable amount of time for FLAC and MP3 files. The delay scales linearly with the seek target, seeking near the beginning is fast, seeking toward the end is proportionally slower, which suggests the decoder is decoding linearly from the beginning of the file rather than using any seek index. (My app deals with “images” of Audio CDs ripped as a single long audio file.) The issue is particularly severe when reading files from an SMB network share (server on Ethernet, client on Wi-Fi with the access point ~2 meters away in line of sight). Quick Benchmark results: I tested with the same 75-minute audio content (16-bit/44.1 kHz stereo, 200,502,708 frames) encoded in five formats, seeking to the midpoint. Over SMB (Local Network, Server on Ethernet, Client on WiFi): Format | Seek + Read Time ----------|------------------ WAV | 0.007 s AIFF | 0.009 s Apple | 0.015 s Lossless | MP3 | 9.2 s FLAC | 30.2 s Locally (MacBook Air M1 SSD) : Format | Seek + Read Time ----------|------------------ WAV | 0.0005 s AIFF | 0.0004 s Apple | 0.0011 s Lossless | MP3 | 0.1958 s FLAC | 0.7528 s WAV, AIFF, and M4A all seek virtually instantly (< 15 ms). MP3 and FLAC exhibit linear-time behavior, with FLAC being the worst affected. Note that M4A (AAC) is also a compressed format that requires decoding after seeking, yet it completes in 15 ms. This rules out any inherent limitation of compressed formats, the MP4 container's packet index (stts/stco) is clearly being used for fast random access. Both MP3 (Xing/LAME TOC) and FLAC (SEEKTABLE metadata block) have their own seek mechanisms that should provide similar performance. Minimal CLI tool to reproduce: import Foundation guard CommandLine.arguments.count > 1 else { print("Usage: FLACSpeed <audio-file-path>") exit(1) } let path = CommandLine.arguments[1] let fileURL = URL(fileURLWithPath: path) do { let file = try AVAudioFile(forReading: fileURL) let format = file.processingFormat let buffer = AVAudioPCMBuffer(pcmFormat: format, frameCapacity: 8192)! let totalFrames = file.length let seekTarget = totalFrames / 2 print("File: \(fileURL.lastPathComponent)") print("Format: \(format)") print("Total frames: \(totalFrames)") print("Seeking to frame: \(seekTarget)") file.framePosition = seekTarget let start = CFAbsoluteTimeGetCurrent() try file.read(into: buffer, frameCount: 8192) let elapsed = CFAbsoluteTimeGetCurrent() - start print("Read after seek took \(elapsed) seconds") } catch { print("Error: \(error.localizedDescription)") exit(1) } Expected behavior: AVAudio​File​.read(into​:frame​Count:) after setting frame​Position should use the available seek mechanisms in FLAC and MP3 files for fast random access, as it already does for M4A (AAC). Even accounting for the fact that seek tables provide approximate (not sample-precise) positioning, the "jump to nearest index point + decode forward" approach should complete in milliseconds, not seconds. Workaround: For FLAC, I've worked around this by using libFLAC directly, which provides instant seeking via FLAC__stream​_decoder​_seek​_absolute(). libFLAC Performance: For comparison, libFLAC's FLAC__stream​_decoder​_seek​_absolute() performs the same seek + read on the same FLAC file in around 0.015, using the FLAC seek table to jump to the nearest preceding seek point, then decoding forward a small number of frames to the exact target sample.

We have an VoiP application, our application can be configured to amplify the PCM samples before feeding it to the Player to achieve volume gain at the receiver. In order to support this, We follow as below. If User has configured this Gain Settings within application, Application applies the amplification for the samples to introduce the gain. Application will also set the AVAudioSessionCategory to AVAudioSessionCategoryPlayback Provided the User has chosen the output to Speaker. This settings was working for us but we see there is a difference in behaviour w.r.t Volume Level System Settings between OS 26.3.1 and OS 26.4 When user has chosen earpiece as Output, then we will set the AVAudioSessionCategory to AVAudioSessionCategoryPlayAndRecord. User would have set the volume level to minimum. When user will change the output to Speaker, then we will set the AVAudioSessionCategory to AVAudioSessionCategoryPlayback. The expectation is, the volume level should be of AVAudioSessionCategoryPlayback what was set earlier instead we are seeing the volume level stays as minimum which was set to AVAudioSessionCategoryPlayAndRecord Could you please explain about this inconsistency w.r.t Volume level.

Hello everyone, I have a question regarding the Ultra-Low Latency Frame Interpolation and Super Resolution features introduced in WWDC 2025 Session 300 (https://developer.apple.com/videos/play/wwdc2025/300/). In the video, it was mentioned that these features run on any device as long as it has iOS 26.0 or later and an Apple Silicon chipset. Based on the official support guide (https://support.apple.com/ko-kr/guide/iphone/iphe3fa5df43/ios), the iPhone 11 and iPhone SE (2nd generation) are listed as supported devices. I just want to double-check and confirm: since they meet the criteria mentioned in the video, do these features actually run without any performance issues or limitations on the iPhone 11 and iPhone SE (2nd gen)? I want to make sure I understand the exact hardware capabilities before proceeding with development. Thanks for your help!

While working on a heart rate measurement app (photoplethysmography via camera), we faced systematic err=-17281 (FigCaptureSourceRemote) issues on real devices starting from iOS 17+, and the problem became more noticeable after iOS 26. The error often appeared during AVCaptureSession initialization or when restarting capture, especially under high frame rates (30-60 FPS) and frequent foreground/background transitions. Root cause (our understanding): Camera hardware/session not fully released after previous use Race conditions between session teardown and new setup Changes in AVFoundation capture pipeline in recent iOS versions Our solution: Instead of blocking delays, we implemented asynchronous retry logic with explicit hardware readiness check via AVCaptureDevice.lockForConfiguration().

With the Voice Conversational Entitlement, can a CarPlay app establish a turn-based audio interface that operates in two modes: Speaking mode: Audio Session configured for playback Buffered audio Listening mode: Switch Audio Session to .record or .playAndRecord Activate SFSpeechRecognizer And continue toggling back and forth. The app should listen for responses to questions or other audio cues, and assuming those answers are correct (based on analysis of results from SFSpeechRecognizer), continue this pattern of mode 1 and 2 alternating. This appears to be a valid use of this entitlement. Does this also require the Audio App Entitlement, or is the Voice Conversational Entitlement sufficient? Are there other obstacles to this type of app that I'm not seeing? Or perhaps this is technically possible, but unlikely to pass app store review?

AVPictureInPictureController with AVSampleBufferDisplayLayer: Video not scaled in PiP window on macOS Platform: macOS 26.4 (Tahoe) Framework: AVKit / AVFoundation Xcode: 26.4 Summary When using AVPictureInPictureController with ContentSource(sampleBufferDisplayLayer:playbackDelegate:) on macOS, the video content in the PiP window is not scaled to fit — it renders at 1:1 pixel resolution, showing only the bottom-left portion of the video (zoomed/cropped). The same code works correctly on iOS. Setup let displayLayer = AVSampleBufferDisplayLayer() displayLayer.videoGravity = .resizeAspect // Host displayLayer as a sublayer of an NSView, enqueue CMSampleBuffers let source = AVPictureInPictureController.ContentSource( sampleBufferDisplayLayer: displayLayer, playbackDelegate: self ) let pip = AVPictureInPictureController(contentSource: source) pip.delegate = self The source display layer is 1280×720, matching the video stream resolution. PiP starts successfully — isPictureInPicturePossible is true, the PiP button works, and the PIPPanel window appears. However, the video in the PiP window (~480×270) shows only the bottom-left 480×270 pixels of the 1280×720 content, rather than scaling the full frame to fit. Investigation Inspecting the PiP window hierarchy reveals: PIPPanel (480×270) └─ AVPictureInPictureSampleBufferDisplayLayerView └─ AVPictureInPictureSampleBufferDisplayLayerHostView (layer = CALayerHost) └─ AVPictureInPictureCALayerHostView The CALayerHost mirrors the source AVSampleBufferDisplayLayer at 1:1 pixel resolution. Unlike AVPlayerLayer-based PiP (which works correctly on macOS), the sample buffer display layer path does not apply any scaling transform to the mirrored content. On iOS, PiP with AVSampleBufferDisplayLayer works correctly because the system reparents the layer into the PiP window, so standard layer scaling applies. On macOS, the system uses CALayerHost mirroring instead, and the scaling step is missing. What I tried (none fix the issue) Setting autoresizingMask on all PiP internal subviews — views resize correctly, but CALayerHost content remains at 1:1 pixel scale Applying CATransform3DMakeScale on the CALayerHost layer — creates a black rectangle artifact; the mirrored content does not transform Setting CALayerHost.bounds to the source layer size — no effect on rendering Reparenting the internal AVPictureInPictureCALayerHostView out of the host view — video disappears entirely Hiding the CALayerHost — PiP window goes white (confirming it is the sole video renderer) Resizing the source AVSampleBufferDisplayLayer to match the PiP window size — partially works (1:1 mirror of a smaller source fits), but causes visible lag during resize, affects the main window's "This video is playing in Picture in Picture" placeholder, and didTransitionToRenderSize stops being called after the initial resize Expected behavior The video content should be scaled to fit the PiP window, respecting the display layer's videoGravity setting (.resizeAspect), consistent with: iOS PiP with AVSampleBufferDisplayLayer (works correctly) macOS PiP with AVPlayerLayer (works correctly) Environment macOS 26.4 (Tahoe) Xcode 26.4 Apple Silicon (M-series) Retina display (contentsScale = 2.0) Video: H.264 1280×720, hardware decoded via VTDecompressionSession, enqueued as CMSampleBuffer

The Android MusicKit documentation documents two functions that are not actually exposed/added to the SDK. https://developer.apple.com/musickit/android/com/apple/android/music/playback/controller/MediaPlayerController.html#canSetRadioLikeState-- https://developer.apple.com/musickit/android/com/apple/android/music/playback/controller/MediaPlayerController.html#setRadioLikeState-int- Is the documentation stale or is the SDK out of date?

Hello Apple Developer Support, I am reaching out for technical guidance regarding screen capture protection behavior on macOS. We are building a desktop application using Flutter running on macOS, and we have implemented native Swift code inside the macOS Runner in order to protect sensitive content from screen recording and screen sharing. Our current implementation relies on native window-level protection and display state handling from Swift, while the main UI remains rendered by Flutter. The main challenge we are facing is the following: we need to keep a strong native anti-recording protection on macOS the application is heavily used with AirPlay and screen mirroring currently, AirPlay / mirroring is often interpreted by the system similarly to screen capture or screen recording this causes our protected content to be replaced by a gray or blank area even during legitimate AirPlay usage In practice, we would like to allow: AirPlay legitimate external display / mirroring usage while still preventing: screen recording screen sharing unauthorized screen capture We would like to know whether Apple recommends an official supported approach for this use case, preferably using public APIs. More specifically: Is there an officially supported way on macOS to distinguish AirPlay mirroring from screen recording / screen sharing? Is "NSWindow.sharingType" the recommended public API for this scenario? Is there a recommended approach when the UI surface is rendered through Flutter / Metal? Are there any best practices with ScreenCaptureKit for protecting content without affecting AirPlay? We understand that some lower-level APIs may not be officially supported, so we would greatly appreciate guidance toward a public and future-proof implementation path. Thank you very much for your time and support. Best regards, Tony

I'm developing an iOS app that uses Apple's DockKit framework to control gimbals. I've tested with the Insta360 Flow 2 Pro and the DJI Osmo Mobile 8. The Flow 2 Pro supports all DockKit motor control APIs — setAngularVelocity, setOrientation, setLimits — which lets my app do manual pan/tilt control via a virtual joystick. The Osmo Mobile 8 (model DS308, firmware 1.0.0) connects fine via DockKit and reports as docked, but every motor control API fails with "The device doesn't support the requested operation": setAngularVelocity — fails setOrientation(relative: true) — fails setLimits — fails The only thing that works is Apple's system tracking (setSystemTrackingEnabled(true)) for automatic face/body following. This means there's no way for third-party apps to do manual gimbal control (pan/tilt via joystick) on the Osmo 8 through DockKit — only automatic tracking works. Questions: Is anyone else seeing the same limitation with the Osmo 8 and DockKit? Has DJI confirmed whether manual motor control via DockKit is intentionally unsupported, or is this a firmware issue that might be addressed in an update? Does the DJI Mimo app use DockKit for its tracking, or does it use a proprietary Bluetooth protocol? Running iOS 26.4 on iPhone 15 Pro. Happy to share more technical details if helpful.