I have implemented a XPC server using C APIs. I want to write unit tests for it.
I came across the following links that use Swift APIs-
Testing and Debugging XPC Code With an Anonymous Listener
TN3113
I have tried to write anonymous listener code and the client code in the same file, using C APIs-
#include <unistd.h>
#include <syslog.h>
#include <pthread.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <xpc/xpc.h>
#include <xpc/connection.h>
#include <CoreFoundation/CoreFoundation.h>
static void Anon_Client_Connection_Handler(xpc_connection_t connection, xpc_object_t clientMessage)
{
const char *description = xpc_copy_description(clientMessage);
printf("Event received - %s\n", description);
free((void *)description);
xpc_type_t type = xpc_get_type(clientMessage);
if (type == XPC_TYPE_ERROR)
{
if (clientMessage == XPC_ERROR_CONNECTION_INVALID)
printf("Client_Connection_Handler received invalid connection n");
else if (clientMessage == XPC_ERROR_TERMINATION_IMMINENT)
printf("Client_Connection_Handler received termination notice n");
}
else
{
const char *clientMsg = xpc_dictionary_get_string(clientMessage, "message");
printf("Received from client: %s ", clientMsg);
}
}
static void Anon_Listener_Connection_Handler(xpc_connection_t connection)
{
printf("Anon_Listener_Connection_Handler called, setting up event handler \n");
xpc_connection_set_event_handler(connection, ^(xpc_object_t clientMessage) {
printf("Processing the connection! \n");
Anon_Client_Connection_Handler(connection, clientMessage);
});
xpc_connection_resume(connection);
}
int main(int argc, const char *argv[])
{
xpc_connection_t anon_listener = xpc_connection_create(NULL, NULL);
xpc_connection_set_event_handler(anon_listener, ^(xpc_object_t clientConnection) {
printf("Client tried to connect \n");
Anon_Listener_Connection_Handler(clientConnection);
});
xpc_connection_resume(anon_listener);
printf("\nINFO Anonymous connection resumed");
xpc_object_t anon_endpoint = xpc_endpoint_create(anon_listener);
xpc_connection_t clientConnection = xpc_connection_create_from_endpoint(anon_endpoint);
xpc_object_t message = xpc_dictionary_create(NULL, NULL, 0);
xpc_dictionary_set_string(message, "message", "client's message");
xpc_connection_send_message_with_reply(clientConnection, message, dispatch_get_main_queue(), ^(xpc_object_t event) {
printf("\nINFO inside reply");
const char *description = xpc_copy_description(event);
printf("\nINFO %s",description);
free((void *)description);
});
xpc_release(message);
xpc_release(anon_listener);
printf("\nINFO Releasing listener");
xpc_release(anon_endpoint);
printf("\nINFO Releasing endpoint");
// dispatch_main();
return 0;
}
and this is the output I get
INFO Anonymous connection resumed
INFO Releasing listener
INFO Releasing endpoint
I am not able to connect to the client and exchange messages. Where am I going wrong?
Post
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
I am using C APIs for XPC communication.
When my XPC server gets a xpc_dictionary as a message, I use xpc_dictionary_get_string to get the string which is of type const char*. Afterwards, when I try to free up the memory for the string, I get an error.
I could not find any details on why this happens.
Does XPC handle the lifecycle of these C strings ?
I did some tests to see the behaviour.
The following code snippet prints a string temp before and after releasing the dictionary memory.
char* string = "dummy-string";
xpc_object_t dict = xpc_dictionary_create(NULL, NULL, 0); xpc_dictionary_set_string(dict, "str", string);
const char* temp = xpc_dictionary_get_string(reply, "str");
printf("temp before release: %s\n", temp);
xpc_release(reply);
printf("temp after release: %s\n", temp);
output:
# temp before release: dummy-string
# temp after release:
I tried to free the variable temp before and after releasing dict .
char* string = "dummy-string";
xpc_object_t dict = xpc_dictionary_create(NULL, NULL, 0); xpc_dictionary_set_string(dict, "str", string);
const char* temp = xpc_dictionary_get_string(dict, "str");
printf("temp before release: %s\n", temp);
free((void *)temp); // case 1
xpc_release(dict);
// free((void *)temp); // case 2
printf("temp after release: %s\n", temp);
in both the cases i got the output:
# temp before release: dummy-string
# app(18502,0x1f02fc840) malloc: Double free of object 0x145004a20
# app(18502,0x1f02fc840) malloc: *** set a breakpoint in malloc_error_break to debug
# SIGABRT: abort
# PC=0x186953720 m=0 sigcode=0
# signal arrived during cgo execution
# ...
# ...
On my MAC, I have a XPC server running as a daemon. It also checks the clients for codesigning requirements.
I have multiple clients(2 or more).
Each of these clients periodically(say 5 seconds) poll the XPC server to ask for a particular data.
I want to understand how the performance of my MAC will be affected when multiple XPC clients keep polling a XPC server.
I have created a XPC server and client using C APIs. I want to ensure that I trust the client, so I want to have a codesigning requirement on the server side, something like -
xpc_connection_set_peer_code_signing_requirement(listener, "anchor apple generic and certificate leaf[subject.OU] = \"1234567\"")
This checks if the client code was signed by a code-signing-identity issued by Apple and that the teamID in the leaf certificate is 1234567.
My questions are-
Is using teamID as a signing requirement enough? What else can I add to this requirement to make it more secure?
How does xpc_connection_set_peer_code_signing_requirement work internally? Does it do any cryptographic operations to verify the clients signature or does it simply do string matching on the teamID?
Is there a way actually verify the clients signature(cryptographically) before establishing a connection with the server? (so we know the client is who he claims to be)
I have followed this post for creating a Launch Agent that provides an XPC service on macOS using Swift-
post link - https://rderik.com/blog/creating-a-launch-agent-that-provides-an-xpc-service-on-macos/
In the swift code the interface of the XPC service is defined by protocols which makes the code nice and neat. I want to implement the XPC service using C APIs for XPC, and C APIs send and receive messages using dictionaries, which need manual handling with conditional statements.
I want to know if its possible to go with the protocol based approach with C APIs.