Hello, I uploaded a new iOS build (1.0.1 - Build 180) to App Store Connect for my app "Benimle Konus". The build has been processed successfully and is marked as "Ready to Test". However, when I try to assign this build to any internal TestFlight group, the group checkboxes are greyed out and cannot be selected. I’ve made sure that: All required metadata is filled out. What’s New and compliance information is complete. Previous builds worked with the same TestFlight groups. To fix this, I have uploaded 3 separate builds, but the issue still persists with all of them. There are no error messages, but I can't continue testing because I can't assign the build to testers. App ID: 6742759002 Bundle ID: com.benimlekonus.app Build Version: 1.0.1 (180) Is this a known issue or something I'm missing? Any help would be appreciated.

So, I was attempting to rename my Finder Tags. Unfortunately, I’m also trying Apple’s Intelligent Writing Tools to proofread it, but I’ve encountered a bug in it. Here’s an example: For reference, my macOS version is macOS Sequoia 15.3.2 (24D81)—a stable version. I hope that bug is fixed soon.

Hi everyone, I've been working on an iOS app for about a year and a half. That application comes with unit and UI automated testings. Recently I started the development of the tvOS application so I added a new target and used the same bundle id as I want to eventually share purchases. What I need I'm working on an application that uses VLC (Need to play media more exotic than MP4) through these two pods pod 'MobileVLCKit', '3.6.0' (Only for iOS) pod 'TVVLCKit', '3.6.0' (Only for tvOS) What works Compilation works fine for both targets Unit tests work fine for both targets UI tests work fine ONLY for the original iOS target What doesn't work and how it fails When I launch the UI tests for the tvOS target, the compilation succeeds, but I get an error when calling app.launch() from my XCTestCase. Failed to get launch progress for <XCUIApplicationImpl: 0x600000c61e90 abergia.com.iptv at ...AppPath...>: App installation failed: Unable to Install “...AppName...”. This app is not made for this device. This app was not built to support this device family; app is compatible with ( 1, 2 ) but this device supports ( 3 ). (Underlying Error: Unable to Install “...AppName...”. This app is not made for this device. This app was not built to support this device family; app is compatible with ( 1, 2 ) but this device supports ( 3 ). What I tried Single target - Both Pods It looks like I can 'cheat' a little the system and make the Xcode target compatible with both iOS and tvO, but when declaring both pods inside the same CocoaPod target, the installation fails as one of the library is not compatible. Use a newer version of VLC (4.0.0) Works BUT that version is way too unstable, I will eventually use it again once they fix all the issues. Different Bundle ID Changing the bundle id of the tvOS application resolves the issue BUT I really want to use the same bundle id to share the purchases. Not UI testing the tvOS version It's an option I'm starting to contemplate out of frustration but I'm sure that we have people here who can help me!

Hello, I struggle to do some UI testing using accessibility identifiers when I wrap some SwiftUI view using UIHostingController (our app is mainly coded using UIKit). Considering this SwiftUI view (simplified for this post): HStack { Text(self.title.uppercased()) .albusTheme(.header) .lineLimit(self.isMultiline ? nil : 1) .multilineTextAlignment(.leading) .accessibilityAddTraits(.isStaticText) .accessibilityIdentifier("section_title") } This view and its controller are embedded as a UITableViewHeaderFooterView in a UITableView. This is an extract of recursiveDescription output: | | | | | | <_UITableViewHeaderFooterContentView: 0x1076ad720; frame = (0 0; 393 40); layer = <CALayer: 0x6000006b1720>> | | | | | | | <_TtGC13ListComponent19SwiftUIFieldContentV20ListComponentLibrary17FormSectionHeader_: 0x1076ab980; baseClass = UIControl; frame = (0 0; 393 40); layer = <CALayer: 0x6000006b1da0>> | | | | | | | | <_TtGC7SwiftUI14_UIHostingViewV20ListComponentLibrary17FormSectionHeader_: 0x1078f9600; frame = (0 0; 393 40); gestureRecognizers = <NSArray: 0x600000e25d70>; backgroundColor = UIExtendedSRGBColorSpace 0.0666667 0.133333 0.227451 1; layer = <SwiftUI.UIHostingViewDebugLayer: 0x6000006b19a0>> | | | | | | | | | <_TtCOCV7SwiftUI11DisplayList11ViewUpdater8Platform13CGDrawingView: 0x106985550; frame = (16 12.6667; 147.667 14.6667); anchorPoint = (0, 0); opaque = NO; autoresizesSubviews = NO; layer = <_TtCOCV7SwiftUI11DisplayList11ViewUpdater8PlatformP33_65A81BD07F0108B0485D2E15DE104A7514CGDrawingLayer: 0x6000026b8240>> CGDrawingView seems to hide the underlying view hierarchy. Is there a way to access accessibility settings using the integration of SwiftUI in UIKit?

Dear Apple & Community, I am encountering an issue while running my Unit tests on Xcode 16. I'm receiving the following error in the debugger area. Error loading /var/containers/Bundle/Application/FF057050-1BCC-49D8-9D3F-A3731E30F354/<Project_name>.app/PlugIns/<Project_name>.xctest/<Project_name>Tests (133): dlopen(/var/containers/Bundle/Application/FF057050-1BCC-49D8-9D3F-A3731E30F354/<Project_name>.app/PlugIns/<Project_name>.xctest/<Project_name>Tests, 0x0109): Symbol not found: _$s5Model11AccountDataV7TestingE4mockACvau Referenced from: <4027FFAF-5C6C-3F8A-9862-648D3D4A1257> /private/var/containers/Bundle/Application/FF057050-1BCC-49D8-9D3F-A3731E30F354/<Project_name>.app/PlugIns/<Project_name>.xctest/<Project_name>Tests Expected in: <406DF294-634D-3D8A-8E59-BEE455BA96AF> /System/Developer/Library/Frameworks/Testing.framework/Testing Failed to load test bundle from file:///private/var/containers/Bundle/Application/FF057050-1BCC-49D8-9D3F-A3731E30F354/<Project_name>.app/PlugIns/<Project_name>.xctest/: Error Domain=NSCocoaErrorDomain Code=3588 .....

I have implemented a XPC server using C APIs. I want to write unit tests for it. I came across the following links that use Swift APIs- Testing and Debugging XPC Code With an Anonymous Listener TN3113 I have tried to write anonymous listener code and the client code in the same file, using C APIs- #include <unistd.h> #include <syslog.h> #include <pthread.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <xpc/xpc.h> #include <xpc/connection.h> #include <CoreFoundation/CoreFoundation.h> static void Anon_Client_Connection_Handler(xpc_connection_t connection, xpc_object_t clientMessage) { const char *description = xpc_copy_description(clientMessage); printf("Event received - %s\n", description); free((void *)description); xpc_type_t type = xpc_get_type(clientMessage); if (type == XPC_TYPE_ERROR) { if (clientMessage == XPC_ERROR_CONNECTION_INVALID) printf("Client_Connection_Handler received invalid connection n"); else if (clientMessage == XPC_ERROR_TERMINATION_IMMINENT) printf("Client_Connection_Handler received termination notice n"); } else { const char *clientMsg = xpc_dictionary_get_string(clientMessage, "message"); printf("Received from client: %s ", clientMsg); } } static void Anon_Listener_Connection_Handler(xpc_connection_t connection) { printf("Anon_Listener_Connection_Handler called, setting up event handler \n"); xpc_connection_set_event_handler(connection, ^(xpc_object_t clientMessage) { printf("Processing the connection! \n"); Anon_Client_Connection_Handler(connection, clientMessage); }); xpc_connection_resume(connection); } int main(int argc, const char *argv[]) { xpc_connection_t anon_listener = xpc_connection_create(NULL, NULL); xpc_connection_set_event_handler(anon_listener, ^(xpc_object_t clientConnection) { printf("Client tried to connect \n"); Anon_Listener_Connection_Handler(clientConnection); }); xpc_connection_resume(anon_listener); printf("\nINFO Anonymous connection resumed"); xpc_object_t anon_endpoint = xpc_endpoint_create(anon_listener); xpc_connection_t clientConnection = xpc_connection_create_from_endpoint(anon_endpoint); xpc_object_t message = xpc_dictionary_create(NULL, NULL, 0); xpc_dictionary_set_string(message, "message", "client's message"); xpc_connection_send_message_with_reply(clientConnection, message, dispatch_get_main_queue(), ^(xpc_object_t event) { printf("\nINFO inside reply"); const char *description = xpc_copy_description(event); printf("\nINFO %s",description); free((void *)description); }); xpc_release(message); xpc_release(anon_listener); printf("\nINFO Releasing listener"); xpc_release(anon_endpoint); printf("\nINFO Releasing endpoint"); // dispatch_main(); return 0; } and this is the output I get INFO Anonymous connection resumed INFO Releasing listener INFO Releasing endpoint I am not able to connect to the client and exchange messages. Where am I going wrong?

In the test plan settings, it's possible to select an .xcappdata bundle for a set of tests: I failed to find any documentation about it in the context of macOS apps testing. What I'm trying to achieve is having a sandboxed app container (/Users/{user}/Library/Containers/{bundle-id)/Data/) replaced before running a test suite. Is it something possible to achieve using the latest Xcode? What should be the .xcappdata structure to make it work on macOS?

Hello, I have a few questions about increasing a price increase for an existing subscription on an iOS application: 1.) Is it possible to test the price increase in the sandbox environment? If so do I have to plan the scheduled increase first or can I create this scenario in the sandbox environment without any scheduling? I ask because id like to test the new price update in some of the local code first without having the risk of a user getting notified that a price increase is coming before the app is ready to display it properly. 2.) When a price increase is scheduled say two weeks out, but then its determined that we need to cancel it by deleting it from app store connect. Are users that were potentially notified of the price increase via the consent form notified a second time that it has been cancelled? Thanks for any help!

As SwiftUI adoption grows, developers face challenges in effectively measuring and optimizing SwiftUI app performance within automated tests. Currently, the only viable approach to analyzing SwiftUI performance is through Profiling (Instruments), which, while powerful, lacks the ability to be incorporated into automated testing workflows. It would be incredibly valuable if XCTest could introduce new performance metrics specifically tailored for SwiftUI, allowing us to write tests against common performance bottlenecks. Suggested Metrics: View Body Evaluation Count – Tracks how often a SwiftUI body is recomputed to detect unnecessary re-renders. Slow View Bodies – Flags SwiftUI views that take a significant amount of time to compute their body. These metrics would help developers identify inefficiencies early, enforce performance best practices through CI/CD pipelines, and ensure a smooth user experience. I believe adding these performance metrics would be a game-changer for SwiftUI development. Thank you for your time and consideration!

When test support code relies on production code, a diamond can occur. If this occurs across packages, it can lead to duplicated symbols and incorrect behavior at runtime despite no warnings at build time. This only occurs in Xcode and top-level application testing. This doesn't occur when the code being tested is in a separate package. I'm trying to understand how to correctly manage shared test support code which needs to access production code, or if this is the correct way and it is an Xcode bug. For a minimized example project, see https://github.com/rnapier/SupportCode. The setup includes three packages: Dependencies, which manages all the dependencies for the app and tests; Core which contains core logic and test support; and Feature, which relies on Core an contains feature-related logic and test support. Building this system causes Core.framework to show up three times in DerivedData: ./App.app/PlugIns/AppTests.xctest/Frameworks/Core_59974D35D_PackageProduct.framework ./App.app/Frameworks/Core_59974D35D_PackageProduct.framework ./PackageFrameworks/Core_59974D35D_PackageProduct.framework When unit tests are run, there is a collision on the symbol for Keychain: objc[48914]: Class _TtC8Keychain8Keychain is implemented in both /Users/ornapier/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/App-grdjljgevqofhqgflgtrqvhvbtej/Build/Products/Debug-iphonesimulator/PackageFrameworks/Core_59974D35D_PackageProduct.framework/Core_59974D35D_PackageProduct (0x100a98118) and /Users/ornapier/Library/Developer/CoreSimulator/Devices/216C441E-4AE5-45EC-8E52-FA42D8562365/data/Containers/Bundle/Application/7197F2F2-EB26-42FF-B7DB-67116159897D/App.app/PlugIns/AppTests.xctest/AppTests (0x1011002c0). One of the two will be used. Which one is undefined. This is not a benign warning. There are two distinct copies of _TtC8Keychain8Keychain and test cases will access one and the app will access a different one. This leads to mismatches when accessing static instances such as .shared. I believe this dependency graph should work, and it does work as long as the top-level testing system is a Swift module. But if it is the application, it builds successfully, but behaves incorrectly in subtle ways.

I'm seeking advice on distributing a beta iOS app to a business partner for internal testing, but we're encountering a challenge due to their organization's use of Managed Apple IDs. Problem We are developing an iOS app for B2B use and need to provide our partner organization with a beta version for testing. However, this partner organization strictly utilizes Apple Managed IDs for all their employees. Their devices are configured in a way that employees cannot use personal Apple IDs on their company devices. This effectively prevents the use of TestFlight, as TestFlight requires personal Apple IDs for testers. We understand TestFlight is the standard recommendation for beta distribution, but it seems incompatible with organizations heavily invested in Managed Apple IDs and their associated security policies. Question What are the recommended alternative methods for distributing our iOS beta app to this organization for testing, considering these constraints? Are there any official Apple-recommended solutions for B2B beta testing in this scenario when TestFlight is not viable due to Managed Apple ID restrictions? Any insights, suggestions, or alternative approaches would be greatly appreciated. We want to ensure we're following best practices and respecting the partner organization's IT policies while still enabling them to effectively test our application. Thank you in advance

Hallo zusammen, ich habe seit einiger Zeit ein Problem, dass ich eine App 'Warenwirtschaft' aus Xcode heraus nicht mehr im Simulator oder auf meinem IPad starten kann. Ein Compilieren und Verteilen über TestFlight funktioniert weiterhin ohne Probleme. Leider klappt das Debugger nun nicht mehr. Anbei die Fehlermeldung von Xcode. Ich hoffe ihr könnt mir helfen. Grüsse Mark Cannot launch simulated executable: no file found at /Applications/Warenwirtschaft.app Domain: IDEFoundationErrorDomain Code: 1 User Info: { DVTErrorCreationDateKey = "2025-02-05 10:10:06 +0000"; IDERunOperationFailingWorker = IDELaunchiPhoneSimulatorLauncher; } Event Metadata: com.apple.dt.IDERunOperationWorkerFinished : { "device_identifier" = "D572897F-2ECB-4109-9DFC-C7D0FB145C1C"; "device_model" = "iPad16,6"; "device_osBuild" = "18.2 (22C150)"; "device_platform" = "com.apple.platform.iphonesimulator"; "device_thinningType" = "iPad16,6-A"; "dvt_coredevice_version" = "397.28"; "dvt_coresimulator_version" = "993.7"; "dvt_mobiledevice_version" = "1759.81.1"; "launchSession_schemeCommand" = Run; "launchSession_state" = 1; "launchSession_targetArch" = arm64; "operation_duration_ms" = 562; "operation_errorCode" = 1; "operation_errorDomain" = IDEFoundationErrorDomain; "operation_errorWorker" = IDELaunchiPhoneSimulatorLauncher; "operation_name" = IDERunOperationWorkerGroup; "param_debugger_attachToExtensions" = 0; "param_debugger_attachToXPC" = 1; "param_debugger_type" = 3; "param_destination_isProxy" = 0; "param_destination_platform" = "com.apple.platform.iphonesimulator"; "param_diag_113575882_enable" = 0; "param_diag_MainThreadChecker_stopOnIssue" = 0; "param_diag_MallocStackLogging_enableDuringAttach" = 0; "param_diag_MallocStackLogging_enableForXPC" = 1; "param_diag_allowLocationSimulation" = 1; "param_diag_checker_tpc_enable" = 1; "param_diag_gpu_frameCapture_enable" = 0; "param_diag_gpu_shaderValidation_enable" = 0; "param_diag_gpu_validation_enable" = 0; "param_diag_guardMalloc_enable" = 0; "param_diag_memoryGraphOnResourceException" = 0; "param_diag_mtc_enable" = 1; "param_diag_queueDebugging_enable" = 1; "param_diag_runtimeProfile_generate" = 0; "param_diag_sanitizer_asan_enable" = 0; "param_diag_sanitizer_tsan_enable" = 0; "param_diag_sanitizer_tsan_stopOnIssue" = 0; "param_diag_sanitizer_ubsan_enable" = 0; "param_diag_sanitizer_ubsan_stopOnIssue" = 0; "param_diag_showNonLocalizedStrings" = 0; "param_diag_viewDebugging_enabled" = 1; "param_diag_viewDebugging_insertDylibOnLaunch" = 1; "param_install_style" = 2; "param_launcher_UID" = 2; "param_launcher_allowDeviceSensorReplayData" = 0; "param_launcher_kind" = 0; "param_launcher_style" = 0; "param_launcher_substyle" = 0; "param_runnable_appExtensionHostRunMode" = 0; "param_runnable_productType" = "com.apple.product-type.application"; "param_structuredConsoleMode" = 1; "param_testing_launchedForTesting" = 0; "param_testing_suppressSimulatorApp" = 0; "param_testing_usingCLI" = 0; "sdk_canonicalName" = "iphonesimulator18.2"; "sdk_osVersion" = "18.2"; "sdk_variant" = iphonesimulator; } System Information macOS Version 15.3 (Build 24D60) Xcode 16.2 (23507) (Build 16C5032a) Timestamp: 2025-02-05T11:10:06+01:00

I'd like to implement unit tests that exercise keys made available via a persistent token interface. However, when attempting to list available tokens by passing kSecAttrAccessGroupToken as the kSecAttrAccessGroup to SecItemCopyMatching from a unit test, -34018 is returned. It succeeds without the kSecAttrAccessGroup, which makes sense given the unit test binary does not have com.apple.token Keychain Group. The Xcode UI indicates "Capabilities are not supported" for the unit test binary when attempting to add a Keychain Sharing capability to enable use of persistent tokens. This feels like a dead end but begs the question is there any way to implement unit tests to exercise a persistent token interface? It seems like the only path may be write unit tests that drive an independent app that handles the interactions with the persistent token.

Hello, I'm building an expense management app and have the necessary FinanceKit entitlements. However I'm based in India and hence do not have access to an Apple Card. Is there anyway to test FinanceKit with some sort of mock data? I have tried following the developer documentation and built a minimal implementation to share via Testflight to my users. However it's failing to get any transaction data. I'm unable to debug the code myself and if anyone here has valid entitlements along with Apple Card, I'd appreciate if you could debug an example project I made below: https://github.com/tanmays/FinanceKitExample Feedback #FB14136552

We just updated our ATS to the latest 8.3.0 version and tried to run the iAP2 Session Test via BPA100 Bluetooth Analyzer and we are experiencing this EXC_BAD_INSTRUCTION. This same test still seems to work on ATS version 6. Please advise. Process: ATS [1782] Path: /private/var/folders/*/ATS.app/Contents/MacOS/ATS Identifier: com.apple.ATSMacApp Version: 8.3.0 (1826) Build Info: ATSMacApp-1826000000000000~2 (1A613) Code Type: X86-64 (Native) Parent Process: launchd [1] User ID: 501 Date/Time: 2025-01-27 11:05:21.1334 -0800 OS Version: macOS 15.2 (24C101) Report Version: 12 Bridge OS Version: 9.2 (22P2093) Anonymous UUID: 098E2BB5-CB98-CA1C-CEFE-188AF6EFE8CF Time Awake Since Boot: 9700 seconds System Integrity Protection: enabled Crashed Thread: 2 com.apple.ATSMacApp.FrontlineFrameworkInterface Exception Type: EXC_BAD_INSTRUCTION (SIGILL) Exception Codes: 0x0000000000000001, 0x0000000000000000 Termination Reason: Namespace SIGNAL, Code 4 Illegal instruction: 4 Terminating Process: exc handler [1782]

I've been getting this error when opening TestFlight since this morning. I tried restarting the network, re-install testflight, updating my iPhone, and re-logging with my Apple ID. This error prevents me from installing or updating all apps linked to my account, so I don't think it's related to a particular app permission.

Hi team, We were wondering what's the correct way of configuring a test environment with Apple Pay. Not sure if this is explicitly mentioned in the documentation, but in order to avoid having the same certificates shared between test and production, should we have a different merchant identifier (and pair of certificates) for test purposes only? The above is the main question. However, two follow up questions: Do you know if payment processors usually allow the merchant ID to be configured, so that only payments generated with the prod certificates can be accepted? Is there any risk of someone getting hold of the certificates generated for the test environment (which are usually less safe than production) and using that to process payments in production?

Hello, everyone! I'm currently working on creating tests for a study project in Swift. My current task is to create a test to check if a file is saved correctly. The workflow in the app is as follows: Launch the app. Open a file within the app. Modify the file. Save it inside the app. Save it to the Files app. I need to verify if the saved file in the Files app is identical to a base file stored in the app bundle. Initially, I thought I could solve this by creating a UI test, which I've already implemented up to a certain point. The UI test successfully navigates through the workflow steps until it's time to compare the saved file with the base file. The problem is that I cannot open a saved file from the Files app in a UI test because it operates in a sandboxed environment and cannot interact with external app scopes. So, my question is: What should I do in this case? Would it be better to create a unit test specifically for testing the save function and ensure the UI test only verifies if the expected filename exists in the Files app? I would prefer an end-to-end (E2E) test that covers the entire workflow, but it seems Swift splits tests into Unit and UI test groups, making this approach less straightforward. Any suggestions or best practices would be greatly appreciated!

In my macOS app I have a SwiftUI list that starts like this: List(selection: $selection) { HStack { Label("Staging", systemImage: "arrow.up.square") Spacer() WorkspaceStatusBadge(unstagedCount: model.statusCounts.unstaged, stagedCount: model.statusCounts.staged) } (where WorkspaceStatusBadge is a custom view that just contains a Text) I'm trying to set the accessibility ID of that first cell so I can find it in XCUITest. If I apply the accessibilityIdentifier() modifier to the HStack, it instead sets the ID of the two static text elements inside it, and the cell still has no ID. I could find the cell based on the ID of the child staticText, but I have some other cases where this doesn't work as well. If I use .accessibilityElement() on the HStack, then XCUI sees a cell containing a Group element with the ID. This might be workable, but it's certainly not ideal. So how do I set the ID of the cell itself?

Hi, Testflight app is showing "Couldn't Load Apps. TestFlight is currently unavailable. Try again." error each time when i trying to open it last 2 days. I'm tried to uninstall/re-install TestFlight app, but error still remain. Can anyone confirm this error? Devices which is affected with the same error: iPad 6 (2018) / iOS 17.7, iPad Pro / iOS 16.7.9, iPad Air 2 / iOS 15.8.2