column

The context of this question is setting ViewControllers into the secondary column when in a compact environment. It appears as if it always retains the first view controller no matter how many additional ones I set.

When I open the documentation I'm looking at Apple's docs here: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/swift ...but I don't see the icons/columns you're seeing - do you have a link that demos your example, thanks.

Ugh, I'm a moron. It seems... float principleX = thisPhoto.intrinsicMatrix.m20; float principleY = thisPhoto.intrinsicMatrix.m21;Should have been... float principleX = thisPhoto.intrinsicMatrix.m02; float principleY = thisPhoto.intrinsicMatrix.m12;The column/row seems to be swapped.

I have the same issue but need to know a way to avoid this automatic grouping at all. Would like each column has it all accessibility value (similar to the activities chart on health app)

Thank you very much ,but my min3 is NSTableView's first Column can scroll with tableView scroll up and down but can't scroll with tableView scroll left and right like the table's index of i,2,3

As I mentioned before... I set up an ident for the column but the rest of the hierarchy items are default. Where is the ident being called from ?Is it referring to the NSTableColumn / NSTableCellView / NSTextField or NSTextFieldCell ?I haven't setup a nib.

The rows in the English column all contain black text, which is the text passed as the value argument to NSLocalizedString(_:value:comment:). The app also runs in English if I select it in the Xcode scheme editor.

Swift 5.5 introduced a new dot leaded notation. SE-0299Extending Static Member Lookup in Generic Contexts Please try this: .navigationViewStyle(.columns)

Not only does this seem like premature optimization, but I suspect that it's actively counterproductive.When you structure the code using a function-returning function, you're preventing the compiler from doing any inlining. The compiler can't assume that theMethodToUse points anywhere in particular, because its value is calculated at run-time. So any reference to theMethodToUse() will probably result in an actual function call. I suspect you'd be better off from a performance standpoint doing an inlined switch on the number of players, even if that value is constant.But you really can't say for sure without doing some testing. And regardless of the answer, this code is highly unlikely to ever be a performance bottleneck. You just shouldn't be worrying about performance in this context until you've been able to prove that it's an issue in the environment of the completed application.As far as brevity, I don't think you can do much better than Wallacy's revised version with the tuple-valued switch. But that co

Not sure if I'm seeing the same issue as you, but there is an odd offset with the UIPickerView in iOS 14 that wasn't there with iOS 13... Can't seem to post a screen shot or a link to the image I posted on twitter, but I'll try to describe it. I've got 3 components (columns) in a single UIPickerView. and it looks like everything is aligned to the right of the picker, except that the center to center distance of the selected item for each component is different then the center to center distance of each of the unselected item columns. And they get further out of sync the closer you get to the left.

I suggest you start by describing what solution you want, that would solve the problem. If a data item is longer than the width of the column, then I want to … do what? … to make sure the alignment stays correct. If you can describe in words what would solve the problem, you're more than half way to the solution.For example, you might say, If a data item is longer than the width of the column, then I want to warp the fabric of space-time to squeeze the data into the space allowed to make sure the alignment stays correct. Then you'd know you had to go into a physics lab and start inventing.OK, so that's not a practical solution, so what is?

In the Dashboard:1) Select your container. Then choose Schema.2) In the sidebar select the record you want.3) With the record selected in the sidebar you should see a list of System fields and Custom fields. Scroll to the bottom and click the Edit Indexes.4) You'll now see a pop up button appear in the Fields column. Choose recordName (if it isn't already selected in the pop up button) then choose Queryable in the pop up button in the Index Type column. Click Add Index.5) Click Save Changes to save.

I was able to achieve side by side column sections by setting the scroll direction. let config = UICollectionViewCompositionalLayoutConfiguration() config.scrollDirection = .horizontal layout.configuration = config return layout The downside being that the orthogonal scrolling was a pretty choppy since my columns were long lists. I don't think this will work for your layout though, since your layout has sections flowing in both axes. I believe you will need to use a single section with multiple groups. This will make syncing to the datasource more complicated since we can't use the section index, but it should be possible.

Can you share a code example that replicates the issue here? We're tracking similar bugs, but your callout of an explicit stack in the detail column is a configuration we haven't yet seen this issue with.