Search results for

“4.3”

793 results found

Post

Replies

Boosts

Views

Activity

Reply to Apple 4.3 guideline - What to do
They are literally not reading responses. Don't bother. Here's a transcript:Aug 27, 2017 From AppleGuideline 4.2.6 - Design - Minimum Functionality...Guideline 4.3 - Design...Next Steps...Aug 29, 2017 From MeI submitted an appeal but received no confirmation e-mail. Did it go through? Do I need to resubmit my app or just wait now?Aug 30, 2017 From AppleGuideline 4.3 - DesignWe ask that you consolidate your existing apps...Aug 30, 2017 From MeAll I am asking is if my appeal was received? There was no e-mail confirmation.Aug 31, 2017 From Apple4. 3 Design: SpamThank you for your response. However we still find that the previously addressed issue still persists in your application...
Aug ’17
Guideline 4.3(a) - Design - Spam - automatic rejection
I previously written here, and some advices were to appeal to rejection sending them message describing uniqueness of the app. Nothing is working. In short, i have a vpn app (of course by design shares some concept with other apps that are in the app store). But since the rejection i have completely changed the ui, added built in browser, p2p messenger so users could interact with each other without any interference. The app is completely free with no ads. I thought this is it, there's no way it would reject this time, but... i get a notification with rejection repeating the same old message. I'm extremely frustrated and don't know what to do. Tried changing the logo of the app, the name to Incognito - Messenger, VPN, app store screenshots. I've already appealed with screenshots describing unique features that other vpn apps don't have, but the message just repeats from app review team. Submission ID: 1a49ee0b-c4e2-4a36-8372-e4d3b9a8b13f Does anybody have an advice what i can do?
3
0
2.3k
Jan ’25
4.3(a) spam flag on my open source project
Hi there, I am one of the developers of SymPy, a Python library that implements algorithms for symbolic mathematics (a bit like Wolfram Mathematica implemented in Python). I've contributed to SymPy since 2012. I have recently developed a user interface for SymPy, and made it open source: https://github.com/Upabjojr/sympy-editor SymPy Editor has been released as an Android app and as a PythonHosted package (to use it programmatically in Python environments). When it comes to App Store, the app got flagged as spam during review. While indeed containing the binary copy of CPython (necessary to run code written in python) and SymPy (the core math algorithms), all of my user interface is entirely new. What could have triggered this flag? Is it the packaged binaries (CPython and SymPy) or could someone have copied my code and submitted it in parallel (my code is free to clone on github)? Anyone has any idea?
0
0
62
4w
AllFins 4.3(a): clarification pending since Oct 3; Board appeal filed Oct 8
Hello App Review team, Could an Apple staff member help route our existing appeal and clarification request to the responsible team, and advise whether any information is missing? AllFins: Apple ID 6815843947, iOS 2.0 (build 6). Developer Support case: 102982766041. Timeline (Pacific time): September 26, 2026: answered all six information categories requested under Guideline 2.1, including a physical-device demonstration and model notices. Resubmitted build 6 at 10:27 PM. October 3: rejected under 4.3(a), with a general concern about similar binary, metadata and/or concept. Requested actionable clarification at 3:43 PM. October 8: filed the formal App Review Board appeal. October 9: Developer Support confirmed both the appeal and Resolution Centre response were queued, without an estimated timeframe. October 11: still no substantive clarification. Supplied a build-6-specific supplement and requested a telephone discussion in App Store Connect. The submitted app connects California lake/species planni
0
0
126
5d
Reply to 4.3 guideline nightmare
Same here. We have done dozens of apps which serve a particular type of business. Needless to say we try to produce them in a way that it is cost efficient for those businesses. But each app has a totally different look and the content is always different (each one has different data and data sources).Yes Apple is reject saying these violate 4.3. We have been doing this for years, have 700 clients and service customers from small to the largest of their kind in the world. Apple review used to be great and smooth and fast. Now it's become one reject after another that makes no sense with this 4.3. reject being the latest reject fad.
Aug ’17
Reply to XCode 6 with deployment target iOS5 possible?
As far as I tested, when I set the Deployment Target down to 4.3 in the Info pane of the PROJECT setting, I can choose down to 4.3 in the General pane of the TARGETS. This may depend on other settings and I haven't checked all combinations, so please start checking with a simple new project.Anyway, I couldn't find any announcements regarding the deplpyment target from Apple, other than- You need to build your app with the 8.0 SDK or later.- Your app needs to suppert 64-bit.So, apps targeting iOS 5 should be approved for the App Store, if you can fulfill other requirements.Sorry, but the minimum targeted version of our recently released apps is iOS 6, so I may be missing something.
Jul ’15
Resolving 2nd Repeated "Guideline 4.3(a) - Design - Spam" Rejection Within Six Months
We are reaching out for guidance after encountering 2nd repeated Guideline 4.3(a) - Design - Spam rejections for our WeNote app. Here’s a brief timeline of our journey: 2018: We launched the WeNote Android app on Google Play Store. 2019: We started promoting WeNote on YouTube and began development of the WeNote iOS app. Our progress was publicly visible on our Trello board and discussed on the Apple Developer forum. August 17, 2021: We filed an official complaint with Apple regarding a *** company infringing on our app logo, title, and description. The issue was resolved when *** agreed to update their app’s branding. 2022 Year: *** company is terminated from App Store. June 2022: WeNote for iOS was officially released on the Apple App Store. June 17, 2024: We received a rejection from the Apple Review team citing Guideline 4.3(a) - Design - Spam: “We noticed your app shares a similar binary, metadata, and/or concept as apps previously submitted by a terminated Apple Developer Program accoun
2
0
849
Nov ’24
Pending Termination Notice 4.3 (Spam) – Appeal Submitted 7 days ago but no confirmation or response
Hello Apple Developer Community and App Review Team, I received a Pending Termination Notice regarding Section 4.3 (Spam) for my games (Scream Bird and Hopscotch). I submitted a formal appeal 7 days ago detailing the technical context, but I have not yet received an automated confirmation email or a case tracking number. Full Context of My Situation: I had previously published a game called Scream Bird on this account, and that was the first time I received a 4.3 Spam error. It was the first time I'd encountered this error, as all my games and applications are designed by me, from the buttons to the characters and gameplay. When I received that error, I tried to understand and modify my game a bit, thinking it might have overlapped with an existing game. But that build continued to receive the 4.3 Spam error. This time, I really didn't know what to do. I intended to keep the gameplay but redesign everything. Strangely, while I was trying to redesign and change my game, I received an
4
0
904
Jul ’26
Reply to Apple 4.3 guideline - What to do
They are literally not reading responses. Don't bother. Here's a transcript:Aug 27, 2017 From AppleGuideline 4.2.6 - Design - Minimum Functionality...Guideline 4.3 - Design...Next Steps...Aug 29, 2017 From MeI submitted an appeal but received no confirmation e-mail. Did it go through? Do I need to resubmit my app or just wait now?Aug 30, 2017 From AppleGuideline 4.3 - DesignWe ask that you consolidate your existing apps...Aug 30, 2017 From MeAll I am asking is if my appeal was received? There was no e-mail confirmation.Aug 31, 2017 From Apple4. 3 Design: SpamThank you for your response. However we still find that the previously addressed issue still persists in your application...
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Aug ’17
Guideline 4.3(a) - Design - Spam - automatic rejection
I previously written here, and some advices were to appeal to rejection sending them message describing uniqueness of the app. Nothing is working. In short, i have a vpn app (of course by design shares some concept with other apps that are in the app store). But since the rejection i have completely changed the ui, added built in browser, p2p messenger so users could interact with each other without any interference. The app is completely free with no ads. I thought this is it, there's no way it would reject this time, but... i get a notification with rejection repeating the same old message. I'm extremely frustrated and don't know what to do. Tried changing the logo of the app, the name to Incognito - Messenger, VPN, app store screenshots. I've already appealed with screenshots describing unique features that other vpn apps don't have, but the message just repeats from app review team. Submission ID: 1a49ee0b-c4e2-4a36-8372-e4d3b9a8b13f Does anybody have an advice what i can do?
Replies
3
Boosts
0
Views
2.3k
Activity
Jan ’25
4.3(a) spam flag on my open source project
Hi there, I am one of the developers of SymPy, a Python library that implements algorithms for symbolic mathematics (a bit like Wolfram Mathematica implemented in Python). I've contributed to SymPy since 2012. I have recently developed a user interface for SymPy, and made it open source: https://github.com/Upabjojr/sympy-editor SymPy Editor has been released as an Android app and as a PythonHosted package (to use it programmatically in Python environments). When it comes to App Store, the app got flagged as spam during review. While indeed containing the binary copy of CPython (necessary to run code written in python) and SymPy (the core math algorithms), all of my user interface is entirely new. What could have triggered this flag? Is it the packaged binaries (CPython and SymPy) or could someone have copied my code and submitted it in parallel (my code is free to clone on github)? Anyone has any idea?
Replies
0
Boosts
0
Views
62
Activity
4w
AllFins 4.3(a): clarification pending since Oct 3; Board appeal filed Oct 8
Hello App Review team, Could an Apple staff member help route our existing appeal and clarification request to the responsible team, and advise whether any information is missing? AllFins: Apple ID 6815843947, iOS 2.0 (build 6). Developer Support case: 102982766041. Timeline (Pacific time): September 26, 2026: answered all six information categories requested under Guideline 2.1, including a physical-device demonstration and model notices. Resubmitted build 6 at 10:27 PM. October 3: rejected under 4.3(a), with a general concern about similar binary, metadata and/or concept. Requested actionable clarification at 3:43 PM. October 8: filed the formal App Review Board appeal. October 9: Developer Support confirmed both the appeal and Resolution Centre response were queued, without an estimated timeframe. October 11: still no substantive clarification. Supplied a build-6-specific supplement and requested a telephone discussion in App Store Connect. The submitted app connects California lake/species planni
Replies
0
Boosts
0
Views
126
Activity
5d
Reply to 4.3 guideline nightmare
Same here. We have done dozens of apps which serve a particular type of business. Needless to say we try to produce them in a way that it is cost efficient for those businesses. But each app has a totally different look and the content is always different (each one has different data and data sources).Yes Apple is reject saying these violate 4.3. We have been doing this for years, have 700 clients and service customers from small to the largest of their kind in the world. Apple review used to be great and smooth and fast. Now it's become one reject after another that makes no sense with this 4.3. reject being the latest reject fad.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Aug ’17
Reply to still under 4.3(a)
I am same, I delete almost all code, just send a small demo with little almost hand write code with a new game diff from all others in the app store, but give me the 4.3(a). it's with confused.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Apr ’25
Reply to 7.1 Won't Install
Same error.I downloaded xcode 7.1 see Launchpad 4.3GB of 4.3 gb then get message from mac app store try again purchased page.and I try again 3 times still face same error.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Oct ’15
Reply to My App Rejected 4.3 Design: Spam
That stinks. I got a 4.3 just a short while ago and feel super stuck on figuring out how to solve it. My content is unique but apple is claiming the same things they did for you. Did you have any luck figuring this out seeing how it's been years? Thx
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Aug ’22
Reply to XCode 6 with deployment target iOS5 possible?
As far as I tested, when I set the Deployment Target down to 4.3 in the Info pane of the PROJECT setting, I can choose down to 4.3 in the General pane of the TARGETS. This may depend on other settings and I haven't checked all combinations, so please start checking with a simple new project.Anyway, I couldn't find any announcements regarding the deplpyment target from Apple, other than- You need to build your app with the 8.0 SDK or later.- Your app needs to suppert 64-bit.So, apps targeting iOS 5 should be approved for the App Store, if you can fulfill other requirements.Sorry, but the minimum targeted version of our recently released apps is iOS 6, so I may be missing something.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Jul ’15
Reply to what is highest version of osx I can develop on to target ios 5
According to the wikipedia Xcode, Xcode 6.4 is the latest version where minimum Deployment Target is iOS 4.3 or iOS 5.1.1.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XcodeAnd currently you can submit apps with Xcode 6.x. (Though I'm not sure if you need it.)
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Aug ’17
Reply to Whatsapp Sticker Apps Getting Rejected
Today iMessage Sticker app got rejected as well with same reason: 4.3 Design: Spam. It doesn't have any design, it's a sticker app from default Xcode project. It has original content from original artist. These app reviews are getting weirder.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Nov ’18
Resolving 2nd Repeated "Guideline 4.3(a) - Design - Spam" Rejection Within Six Months
We are reaching out for guidance after encountering 2nd repeated Guideline 4.3(a) - Design - Spam rejections for our WeNote app. Here’s a brief timeline of our journey: 2018: We launched the WeNote Android app on Google Play Store. 2019: We started promoting WeNote on YouTube and began development of the WeNote iOS app. Our progress was publicly visible on our Trello board and discussed on the Apple Developer forum. August 17, 2021: We filed an official complaint with Apple regarding a *** company infringing on our app logo, title, and description. The issue was resolved when *** agreed to update their app’s branding. 2022 Year: *** company is terminated from App Store. June 2022: WeNote for iOS was officially released on the Apple App Store. June 17, 2024: We received a rejection from the Apple Review team citing Guideline 4.3(a) - Design - Spam: “We noticed your app shares a similar binary, metadata, and/or concept as apps previously submitted by a terminated Apple Developer Program accoun
Replies
2
Boosts
0
Views
849
Activity
Nov ’24
Reply to Concerns About Rule 4.3 Spam Restriction - Enlightenment Needed
I had a similar issue, and it took a lot of email, phone calls and appeals to finally have Apple understand the apps I'm developing. The reviewers are over zealous in their quest to enforce rule 4.3 and are doing more harm than good. I felt it was a huge waste of time and energy.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Dec ’17
Reply to App Review rejected due to Guideline 4.3(a) - Design - Spam
@App Review After our video call with the Apple Review Team, they mentioned they had reviewed and confirmed that there were no issues with the app, and requested us to re-submit. However, after doing so, they rejected the app again citing the same reason (4.3). ** What is the actual issue here? This is really confusing.**
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Mar ’25
Pending Termination Notice 4.3 (Spam) – Appeal Submitted 7 days ago but no confirmation or response
Hello Apple Developer Community and App Review Team, I received a Pending Termination Notice regarding Section 4.3 (Spam) for my games (Scream Bird and Hopscotch). I submitted a formal appeal 7 days ago detailing the technical context, but I have not yet received an automated confirmation email or a case tracking number. Full Context of My Situation: I had previously published a game called Scream Bird on this account, and that was the first time I received a 4.3 Spam error. It was the first time I'd encountered this error, as all my games and applications are designed by me, from the buttons to the characters and gameplay. When I received that error, I tried to understand and modify my game a bit, thinking it might have overlapped with an existing game. But that build continued to receive the 4.3 Spam error. This time, I really didn't know what to do. I intended to keep the gameplay but redesign everything. Strangely, while I was trying to redesign and change my game, I received an
Replies
4
Boosts
0
Views
904
Activity
Jul ’26