xcode github

search github watchOS-2-heartrate

I am just learning GitHub. How do I push a link?

Looks like you can... My Xcode 9.3 supports down to iOS 8.0 via the Deployment OS setting. You may need to code around any deprecations, etc. Idioms might help.And just a note that after all the chatter surrounding Apple's repeated admonition that as of April 2018 (May 1 is tomorrow...), 'all new apps and updates must support iOS 11', which would mean latest Xcode 9.3 (as of now), iTunes Connect, after nearly two years, remains unchanged, still saying this about that:Submit your builds using Xcode 6 or later, or Application Loader 3.0 or later.If you want to build w/base SDK iOS 9.x, you're free to use Xcode 7.x - which of course means you can't also support iOS 11 - but you seem to be good-to-go in that example, since you have no interest in iOS 11 support.Good luck.

Thanks, I've used Xcode for a long time. So I'm familiar with the breakpoint UI. It's just that they shift as code changes, and then I like to delete them. How do you delete a conflicting Xcode keyboard shortcut? I constantly have this issue. Cmd+ doesn't work. There are no articles online about it. delete just enters the delete key as the keyboard shortcut. This shouldn't have to be this hard. The keyboard shortcut menu even has a red x, but you click on it and it doesn't delete the conflict.

I wrote an example on Github and blog post on how to do this.

Could you please share the github link for the sample?

For what it's worth, this is one of the tools in my toolset on Github.

Search github watchOS-2-heartrate

FWIW I am seeing this with my GitHub actions as well.

I apologize, it is confusing. I don't know what to do so there is no code yet. My previous attempts are snippets and are not whole. I'm looking if there is a function to do this process below before I start coding again.The values are values of the variables x and y, in this specific case the values are 3 and 5, however, the values of x and y will change every loop.As well as the fact if we convert the numbers into strings it would be pointless again, because it would be searching for x, and not searching for the actual value of x.What I was trying to say here is simply I tried the function arrayValue.containsand in order to do that .contains function, I would need to string x, which would make the .contains function search for x, instead of the actual value of x, in this example is 3.if arrayValue.contains(x){}Sorry if it's not clear, I'll do my best, since I am confused myself.

It is in effect the same thing. In particular, you can currently write this code (where x is a property of optional type):guard let x = x else {return} // 'x' is an unwrapped local for the rest of the scopeNote that it's not really unsafe, because you can't assign to the new 'x', and it has the same value as the old x.All that's really in question here is whether this sort of thing is always going to require an explict let x = x somewhere in the syntax, as above, or whether this in the future might be done silently by the compiler.

I will put this on github in the coming weeks and respond back here.

It is solved by adding the username and email of GitHub on the preferences.

I plan to export the product to GitHub, giving it to people there.

Thanks very much jaypri for creating the GitHub project.