Hello, I'm using CoreData + CloudKit and I am facing the following error 134100 "The managed object model version used to open the persistent store is incompatible with the one that was used to create the persistent store." All my schema updates are composed of adding optional attributes to existing entities, adding non-optional attributes (with default value) to existing entities or adding new entities Basically, only things that lightweight migrations can handle. Every time I update the schema, I add a new model version of xcdatamodel - who only has a single configuration (the "Default" one). And I also deploy the updated CloudKit schema from the dashboard. It worked up to v3 of my xcdatamodel, but started to crash for a few users at v4 when I added 16 new attributes (in total) to 4 existing entities. Then again at v5 when I added 2 new optional attributes to 1 existing entity. I'm using a singleton and here is the code: private func generateCloudKitContainer() -> NSPersistentCloudKitContainer { let container = NSPersistentCloudKitContainer(name: "MyAppModel") let fileLocation = URL(...) let description = NSPersistentStoreDescription(url: fileLocation) description.shouldMigrateStoreAutomatically = true description.setOption(true as NSNumber, forKey: NSPersistentHistoryTrackingKey) description.setOption(true as NSNumber, forKey: NSPersistentStoreRemoteChangeNotificationPostOptionKey) let options = NSPersistentCloudKitContainerOptions(containerIdentifier: "iCloud.com.company.MyApp") options.databaseScope = .private description.cloudKitContainerOptions = options container.persistentStoreDescriptions = [description] container.viewContext.automaticallyMergesChangesFromParent = true container.loadPersistentStores { description, error in container.viewContext.mergePolicy = NSMergePolicy(merge: .mergeByPropertyObjectTrumpMergePolicyType) if let error { // Error happens here! } } return container } I can't reproduce it yet. I don't really understand what could lead to this error.

I have developed an app that I had been testing on the hardware device with the developer profile signed builds, I had setup a CloudKit container in development mode and also had tested with Production mode and they are working as expected. I have also tested storekit auto renewal subscriptions using Storekit Config file and all of that is working on the hardware device with the developer profile signed builds. Now comes the Fun Part, I want to use the Distribution profile to test the app for production readiness, I had created a distribution profile and had set that up in the Release under target of the app in Xcode, I have also created sandbox tester account (which is showing inactive even after 7 days - though I am also logged in with this sandbox tester account on a hardware device and under developer setting it shows as a sandbox tester account) All the subscriptions are showing Ready to Submit in the App Store Connect. I need help understand this whole flow, how to ensure I can test CloudKit and storekit for production readiness and then publish my app for the review. Thank you.

Hello everyone, I'm looking for updated information on CloudKit pricing for both public and private users. Apple provides a free tier, but I couldn't find a clear breakdown of the costs for exceeding the free limits. Specifically, I would like to know: Public data storage: What are the costs associated with storing and querying public records? Private data storage: How is pricing handled when a user's private data exceeds their iCloud quota? Additional requests and bandwidth: Are there any charges for extra API requests or data transfer beyond the free limits? If anyone has insights or an official reference, I'd really appreciate your help. Thanks in advance!

I need to know the current date to query CloudKit data with it, like: let predicate = NSPredicate(format: "publishedAt <= %@", currentDateAndTime) I don't need high precision, even +/- a few minutes is fine, but I can't rely on device's time since the user can manually change it. Researching this myself I see that the most reliable method is to get the date from the server. There are NTP servers, but accessing them requires additional libraries which adds complexity. TrueTime (last updated 6 years ago) and Kronos (updated like once a year) seem outdated, given how much Swift has changed in the past years. I can make an HTTP request to a website like Google or Apple and read the current time from its headers. But I don't know if this method is reliable. I know I can create a dummy record in CloudKit, update it, and read its modificationDate. But it feels hacky. Maybe there is another way to fetch the current date directly from CloudKit? It feels like it should be easy and there is a straightforward solution, but I just can't find it.

I have a project that currently has data saved locally and I'm trying to get it to sync over multiple devices. Currently basic data is syncing perfectly fine, but I'm having issues getting the images to convert to data. From what I've researched it because I'm using a UIImage to convert and this caches the image It works fine when there's only a few images, but if there's several its a pain The associated code func updateLocalImages() { autoreleasepool { let fetchRequest: NSFetchRequest&lt;Project&gt; = Project.fetchRequest() fetchRequest.predicate = NSPredicate(format: "converted = %d", false) fetchRequest.sortDescriptors = [NSSortDescriptor(keyPath: \Project.statusOrder?.sortOrder, ascending: true), NSSortDescriptor(keyPath: \Project.name, ascending: true)] do { let projects = try viewContext.fetch(fetchRequest) for project in projects { currentPicNumber = 0 currentProjectName = project.name ?? "Error loading project" if let pictures = project.pictures { projectPicNumber = pictures.count for pic in pictures { currentPicNumber = currentPicNumber + 1 let picture : Picture = pic as! Picture if let imgData = convertImage(picture: picture) { picture.pictureData = imgData } } project.converted = true saveContext() } } } catch { print("Fetch Failed") } } } func convertImage(picture : Picture)-&gt; Data? { let paths = FileManager.default.urls(for: .documentDirectory, in: .userDomainMask) let path = paths[0] if let picName = picture.pictureName { let imagePath = path.appendingPathComponent(picName) if let uiImage = UIImage(contentsOfFile: imagePath.path) { if let imageData = uiImage.jpegData(compressionQuality: 0.5) { return imageData } } } return nil }```

I'm using NSPersistentCloudKitContainer to save, edit, and delete items, but it only works half of the time. When I delete an item and terminate the app and repoen, sometimes the item is still there and sometimes it isn't. The operations are simple enough: moc.delete(thing) try? moc.save() Here is my DataController. I'm happy to provide more info as needed class DataController: ObservableObject { let container: NSPersistentCloudKitContainer @Published var moc: NSManagedObjectContext init() { container = NSPersistentCloudKitContainer(name: "AppName") container.loadPersistentStores { description, error in if let error = error { print("Core Data failed to load: \(error.localizedDescription)") } } #if DEBUG do { try container.initializeCloudKitSchema(options: []) } catch { print("Error initializing CloudKit schema: \(error.localizedDescription)") } #endif moc = container.viewContext } }

I’m getting a 0xdead10cc crash in a basic CoreData/CloudKit application. I only have one CoreData save call and its made when the app is in the foreground and it's minor so I don't think its being caused by that. My best guess is that it's related to background syncing of CloudKit. Does anyone know how to fix it? I've been advised that adding the following code around any saves will fix it, but it seems weird that this is the solution. I would expect the inner CoreData/CloudKit engine to handle this. ProcessInfo().performActivity(reason: "Persisting to context") { // Save to context here } Here is the crashing thread Thread 7: 0 libsystem_kernel.dylib 0x00000001edc086f4 guarded_pwrite_np + 8 (:-1) 1 libsqlite3.dylib 0x00000001ca71b6e4 seekAndWrite + 456 (sqlite3.c:44287) 2 libsqlite3.dylib 0x00000001ca6d5df4 unixWrite + 180 (sqlite3.c:44365) 3 libsqlite3.dylib 0x00000001ca723b90 pagerWalFrames + 872 (sqlite3.c:67093) 4 libsqlite3.dylib 0x00000001ca6d5b14 sqlite3PagerCommitPhaseOne + 316 (sqlite3.c:70409) 5 libsqlite3.dylib 0x00000001ca6c6494 sqlite3BtreeCommitPhaseOne + 172 (sqlite3.c:81106) 6 libsqlite3.dylib 0x00000001ca6c605c vdbeCommit + 1136 (sqlite3.c:94124) 7 libsqlite3.dylib 0x00000001ca69f778 sqlite3VdbeHalt + 1340 (sqlite3.c:94534) 8 libsqlite3.dylib 0x00000001ca6c0618 sqlite3VdbeExec + 42648 (sqlite3.c:103922) 9 libsqlite3.dylib 0x00000001ca6b56c0 sqlite3_step + 960 (sqlite3.c:97886) 10 CoreData 0x00000001a459ab38 _execute + 128 (NSSQLiteConnection.m:4614) 11 CoreData 0x00000001a45fe004 -[NSSQLiteConnection commitTransaction] + 728 (NSSQLiteConnection.m:3278) 12 CoreData 0x00000001a469888c _executeGenerateObjectIDRequest + 388 (NSSQLCore_Functions.m:6021) 13 CoreData 0x00000001a46986a4 -[NSSQLGenerateObjectIDRequestContext executeRequestCore:] + 28 (NSSQLObjectIDRequestContext.m:42) 14 CoreData 0x00000001a45fb380 -[NSSQLStoreRequestContext executeRequestUsingConnection:] + 240 (NSSQLStoreRequestContext.m:183) 15 CoreData 0x00000001a45fb0a8 __52-[NSSQLDefaultConnectionManager handleStoreRequest:]_block_invoke + 60 (NSSQLConnectionManager.m:307) 16 CoreData 0x00000001a45fafe0 __37-[NSSQLiteConnection performAndWait:]_block_invoke + 48 (NSSQLiteConnection.m:755) 17 libdispatch.dylib 0x00000001a4357fa8 _dispatch_client_callout + 20 (object.m:576) 18 libdispatch.dylib 0x00000001a43677fc _dispatch_lane_barrier_sync_invoke_and_complete + 56 (queue.c:1104) 19 CoreData 0x00000001a45b5ba4 -[NSSQLiteConnection performAndWait:] + 176 (NSSQLiteConnection.m:752) 20 CoreData 0x00000001a45b5a68 -[NSSQLDefaultConnectionManager handleStoreRequest:] + 248 (NSSQLConnectionManager.m:302) 21 CoreData 0x00000001a45b5938 -[NSSQLCoreDispatchManager routeStoreRequest:] + 228 (NSSQLCoreDispatchManager.m:60) 22 CoreData 0x00000001a45b573c -[NSSQLCore dispatchRequest:withRetries:] + 172 (NSSQLCore.m:4044) 23 CoreData 0x00000001a46737b4 -[NSSQLCore _obtainPermanentIDsForObjects:withNotification:error:] + 1324 (NSSQLCore.m:2830) 24 CoreData 0x00000001a460ba98 -[NSSQLCore _prepareForExecuteRequest:withContext:error:] + 272 (NSSQLCore.m:2946) 25 CoreData 0x00000001a460a0f8 __65-[NSPersistentStoreCoordinator executeRequest:withContext:error:]_block_invoke.547 + 8988 (NSPersistentStoreCoordinator.m:2995) 26 CoreData 0x00000001a45d6660 -[NSPersistentStoreCoordinator _routeHeavyweightBlock:] + 264 (NSPersistentStoreCoordinator.m:668) 27 CoreData 0x00000001a45ded28 -[NSPersistentStoreCoordinator executeRequest:withContext:error:] + 1200 (NSPersistentStoreCoordinator.m:2810) 28 CoreData 0x00000001a4655988 -[NSManagedObjectContext save:] + 984 (NSManagedObjectContext.m:1593) 29 CoreData 0x00000001a46f47dc __52+[NSCKEvent beginEventForRequest:withMonitor:error:]_block_invoke_2 + 352 (NSCKEvent.m:76) 30 CoreData 0x00000001a45c28f0 developerSubmittedBlockToNSManagedObjectContextPerform + 476 (NSManagedObjectContext.m:3984) 31 libdispatch.dylib 0x00000001a4357fa8 _dispatch_client_callout + 20 (object.m:576) 32 libdispatch.dylib 0x00000001a43677fc _dispatch_lane_barrier_sync_invoke_and_complete + 56 (queue.c:1104) 33 CoreData 0x00000001a4615c34 -[NSManagedObjectContext performBlockAndWait:] + 308 (NSManagedObjectContext.m:4108) 34 CoreData 0x00000001a46f45ac __52+[NSCKEvent beginEventForRequest:withMonitor:error:]_block_invoke + 192 (NSCKEvent.m:66) 35 CoreData 0x00000001a4825e68 -[PFCloudKitStoreMonitor performBlock:] + 92 (PFCloudKitStoreMonitor.m:148) 36 CoreData 0x00000001a46f4394 +[NSCKEvent beginEventForRequest:withMonitor:error:] + 256 (NSCKEvent.m:61) 37 CoreData 0x00000001a47cc6ec __57-[NSCloudKitMirroringDelegate _performExportWithRequest:]_block_invoke + 260 (NSCloudKitMirroringDelegate.m:1433) 38 CoreData 0x00000001a47c9970 __92-[NSCloudKitMirroringDelegate _openTransactionWithLabel:assertionLabel:andExecuteWorkBlock:]_block_invoke + 72 (NSCloudKitMirroringDelegate.m:957) 39 libdispatch.dylib 0x00000001a4356248 _dispatch_call_block_and_release + 32 (init.c:1549) 40 libdispatch.dylib 0x00000001a4357fa8 _dispatch_client_callout + 20 (object.m:576) 41 libdispatch.dylib 0x00000001a435f5cc _dispatch_lane_serial_drain + 768 (queue.c:3934) 42 libdispatch.dylib 0x00000001a4360158 _dispatch_lane_invoke + 432 (queue.c:4025) 43 libdispatch.dylib 0x00000001a436b38c _dispatch_root_queue_drain_deferred_wlh + 288 (queue.c:7193) 44 libdispatch.dylib 0x00000001a436abd8 _dispatch_workloop_worker_thread + 540 (queue.c:6787) 45 libsystem_pthread.dylib 0x0000000227213680 _pthread_wqthread + 288 (pthread.c:2696) 46 libsystem_pthread.dylib 0x0000000227211474 start_wqthread + 8 (:-1)

I'm beta-testing a CloudKit-based app. One of my testers suddenly reported that they got a .badContainer CloudKit error: <CKError 0x302619800:"Bad Container" (5/1014); server message = "Invalid container to get bundle ids"; op = <...>; uuid = <...>; container ID = "<...>"> (all private info replaced with <...>) The container ID in the message was exactly what I expected, and exactly what other users are successfully using. When I followed up on the report, the user said she tried again later and everything was fine. It's still working fine days later. What could cause a user to get a .badContainer message, when all other users using the same app are fine, the container ID makes sense, and future runs work fine? Is this something I need to worry about? Does it maybe sometimes happen when CloudKit is having some kind of outage?

My question Is there a way to perform an iCloud keychain reset in order to be able to test CKErrorUserDidResetEncryptedDataKey ? I found this section in the CloudKit documentation https://developer.apple.com/documentation/cloudkit/encrypting-user-data#Handle-a-User-Keychain-Reset I want to be prepared for the zoneNotFound / CKErrorUserDidResetEncryptedDataKey case. However, I can't find a way to actually reproduce this error with an iCloud (test-) user and can't find any Apple documentation on how to perform sucha "User Keychain Reset". The only thing that almost looked like it I came across was in the Keychain.app's Settings "Reset Default Keychains…". However, performing this didn't seem to affect the CloudKit data used in our App at all. I've been trying to do this with an Apple account that has 2FA active and a recovery account assigned. We're only targetting >= iOS 18, macOS >= 15.

I'm using SwiftData with CloudKit and have been trying to migrate from SchemaV1 to SchemaV2, but it seems reducing the Entities crashes my app. // Example of migrating from V1 to V2 // Dropping `Person` because it's no longer needed do { // SchemaV1: Person.self, Author.self // SchemaV2: Author.self let schema = Schema(versionedSchema: SchemaV2.self) return try ModelContainer( for: schema, migrationPlan: AppSchemaMigrationPlan.self, configurations: ModelConfiguration( cloudKitDatabase: .automatic) ) } catch { fatalError("Could not create ModelContainer: \(error)") } Is it possible to drop Entities in the Schema Migration Plan? How can I delete the Person model from my Schema and CloudKit?

I am attempting to migrate a cloudkit module that calls on manual cloudkit methods for fetching record zone changes, modifying records, etc to one that utilizes CKSyncEngine. I've got a basic implementation working with just a create method for one of my data models, however it seems like the sync engine keeps calling sync events on the same pending changes. Here is my current flow: The user will hit some button that lets them fill out a form to create a data model. The user saves the form. This triggers a method that takes the resulting data model and queues it to the sync engine's state (engine.state.add(pendingRecordZoneChanges: pendingChanges) I have my delegate method nextRecordZoneChangeBatch(_ context:...) implemented where it fetches the corresponding data model using the record ID and returns a batch containing the corresponding populated record from the data model. I have the handleEvent(_ event:...) delegate method implemented where I handle both .fetchRecordZoneChanges and .sentRecordZoneChanges. I have set up .sentRecordZoneChanges to merge the server record into my local record (and persisted locally) so that the record change tags are the same. After this last portion, it seems that the sync engine continues to keep pushing syncs/updates and I end up with numerous handleEvent(_ event:) calls that keep returning savedRecords (and occasionally failedRecordSaves). Am I missing some step to remove the record from the changes after the sync engine recognizes that I have properly saved the record to the server?

Hi there We're using CloudKit in our app which, generally, syncs data perfectly between devices. However, recently the sync has stopped working (some changes will never sync and the sync is delayed for several days even with the app open on all devices). CloudKit's logs show the error „You can't save and delete the same record" and „Already have a mirrored relationship registered for this key", etc. We’ve a hunch that this issue is related to a mirrored relationship of one database entity. Our scenario: We've subclassed the database entities. The database model (which we can't share publicly) contains mirrored relationships. We store very long texts in the database (similar to a Word document that contains markup data – in case that’s relevant). Deleting all data and starting with a completely new container and bundle identifier didn’t help (we tried that multiple times). This issue occurs on macOS (15.2（24C101) as well on iOS (18.2). Any hints on how to get the sync working again? Should we simply avoid mirrored relationships? Many thanks

I followed these two resources and setup history tracking in SwiftData. SwiftData History tracking: Track model changes with SwiftData history For data deduplication: Sharing Core Data objects between iCloud users In the sample app (CoreDataCloudKitShare), a uuid: UUID field is used for deduplication logic. It sorts the entities by their uuids, reserves the first one, and marks the others as deduplicated. Would it be a viable solution to use a createdAt: Date field for the sort operation instead of a uuid field, or are dates inherently problematic?

Hey, For some reason I see crashes for my iOS app related to CloudKit entitlements. The crash happens on start up and it says: "CKException - Application has malformed entitlements. Found value "*" for entitlement com.apple.developer.icloud-services, expected an array of strings" I have checked my entitlements of the same build on App Store Connect and it shows "com.apple.developer.icloud-services: ( "CloudKit" )" So I am not sure why users are having this issue. I haven't been able to reproduce it. Does anyone have any idea why this is happening? Thanks

My app has been in the App Store a few months. In that time I've added a few updates to my SwiftData schema using a MigrationPlan, and things were seemingly going ok. But then I decided to add CloudKit syncing. I needed to modify my models to be compatible. So, I added another migration stage for it, changed the properties as needed (making things optional or adding default values, etc.). In my tests, everything seemed to work smoothly updating from the previous version to the new version with CloudKit. So I released it to my users. But, that's when I started to see the crashes and error reports come in. I think I've narrowed it down to when users update from older versions of the app. I was finally able to reproduce this on my end, and Core Data is throwing an error when loading the ModelContainer saying "CloudKit integration requires that all attributes be optional, or have a default value set." Even though I did this in the latest schema. It’s like it’s trying to load CloudKit before performing the schema migration, and since it can’t, it just fails and won’t load anything. I’m kinda at a loss how to recover from this for these users other than tell them to delete their app and restart, but obviously they’ll lose their data that way. The only other idea I have is to setup some older builds on TestFlight and direct them to update to those first, then update to the newest production version and hope that solves it. Any other ideas? And what can I do to prevent this for future users who maybe reinstall the app from an older version too? There's nothing special about my code for loading the ModelContainer. Just a basic: let container = try ModelContainer( for: Foo.self, Bar.self, migrationPlan: SchemaMigration.self, configurations: ModelConfiguration(cloudKitDatabase: .automatic) )

In a CloudKit private database, the Owner creates a custom zone and performs the following actions: Creates CKRecord1 with CKShare1 and invites Participant1 to it. Creates CKRecord2 with CKShare2 and invites Participant2 to it. Creates CKRecordShared, which should be accessible to both Participant1 and Participant2. How can I achieve step 3? I observed that: Setting a regular reference from CKRecord1 (or CKRecord2) to CKRecordShared does not automatically make CKRecordShared accessible to Participant1 (or Participant2). CKRecordShared can only have one parent, so it cannot be directly linked via parent reference to both Participant1 and Participant2 at the same time. One potential solution I see is to have the Owner create a separate CKShare for CKRecordShared and share it explicitly with each participant. However, this approach could lead to user errors, as it requires careful management of multiple shares for each participant. Is there a better way to handle this scenario, ensuring that CKRecordShared is accessible to multiple participants without introducing unnecessary complexity or potential errors?

Hi, I've been using Core Data + CloudKit via NSPersistentCloudKitContainer for several years now. Back then I just created my Core Data AND CloudKit fields by hand. Now the time has come for a little lightweight migration to a new Core Data model, let's say I just needed to add one String attribute. So I've done the Core Data local migration as usual, then added this to container code: try? persistentContainer.initializeCloudKitSchema(options: NSPersistentCloudKitContainerSchemaInitializationOptions()) Run. And everything worked great. but… Now I've noticed that CloudKit created new CKAsset fields for each String attribute that I had in Core Data (about 5 new CKAsset fields). Is this normal!? Why? ! Is it safe to deploy these changes to prod? ty. ChatGPT said: "This field is used internally by CloudKit to handle large string values. If the string value is small enough, it is stored in the normal String field, but if it exceeds the size limit (about 1KB), the string is automatically stored as a CKAsset."

Something I want to know and all users of CKSyncEngine care about I'm going to build a full stack solution using CKSyncEngine, but what's the near future and the support and maintenance priorities inside Apple for CKSyncEngine? There is only one short video for CKSyncEngine, in 2023, no updates after that, no future plans mentioned. I'm worried that this technology be deprecated or not activity maintained. This is a complex technology, without being activity maintained (or open-sourced) there will be fatal production issues we the developer cannot solve. The CK developer in the video stated that "many apps" were using the framework, but he did not list any. The only named is NSUbiquitousKeyValueStore, but NSUbiquitousKeyValueStore is too simple a use case. I wonder is apple's Notes.app using it, or going to use it? Is SwiftData using it? API Problems The API design seems a little bit tricky, not designed from a user's perspective. handleEvent doesn't contain any context information about which batch. How do I react the event properly? Let's say our sync code and CKSyncEngine, and callbacks are all on a dedicated thread. Consider this: in nextRecordZoneChangeBatch you provided a batch of changes, let's call this BATCH 1, including an item in database with uuid "xxx" and name "yyy" before the changes are uploaded, there are new changes from many OTHER BACKGROUND THREADS made to the database. item "xxx"'s name is now "zzz" handle SentRecordZoneChanges event: I get records that uploaded or failed, but I don't know which BATCH the records belong to. How do I decide if i have to mark "xxx" as finished uploading or not? If I mark xxx as finished that's wrong, the new name "zzz" is not uploaded. I have to compare every field of xxx with the savedRecord to decide if I finished uploading or not? That is not acceptable as the performance and memory will be bad. Other questions I have to add recordIDs to state, and wait for the engine to react. I don't think this is a good idea, because recordID is a CloudKit concept, and what I want to sync is a local database. I don't see any rational for this, or not documented. If the engine is going to ask for a batch of records, you can get all record ids from the batch?

In Apple Numbers and similar apps, a user can save a document to iCloud Drive, and collaborate with other users. From what I can gather, it seems to use two mechanisms: the document as a whole is synced via iCloud Drive, but when a collaboration is started, it seems to use CloudKit records to do live updates. I am working on a similar app, that saves documents to iCloud Drive (on Mac, iPad, and iPhone). Currently it only syncs via iCloud Drive, re-reading the entire (often large) document when a remote change occurs. This can lead to a delay of several seconds (up to a minute) for the document to be saved, synced to the server, synced from the server, and re-read. I'm working on adding a "live sync", i.e. the ability to see changes in as near to real-time as feasible, like in Apple's apps. The document as a whole will remain syncing via iCloud Drive. My thought is to add a CloudKit CKRecord-based sync when two or more users are collaborating on a document, recording only the diffs for quick updates. The app would no longer re-read the entire document when iCloud Drive updates it while in use, and would instead read the CloudKit records and apply those changes. This should be much faster. Is my understanding of how Apple does it correct? Does my proposed approach seem sensible? Has anyone else implemented something like this, with iCloud Drive-based documents and a CloudKit live sync? In terms of technologies, I see that Apple now has a Shared with You framework, with the ability to use a NSItemProvider to start the collaboration. Which raises the question, should I use the iCloud Drive document for the collaboration (as I do now), or the CloudKit CKShare diff? I think I'd have to use the document as a whole, both so it works with the Send Copy option, and so a user that doesn't have the document gets it when using Collaborate. Once the collaboration is underway, I'd want to start the CloudKit channel. So I guess I'd save the CKShare to the server, get its URL, and save that in the document, so another user can read that URL as part of their initial load of the document from iCloud Drive? Once two (or more) users have the document via iCloud Drive, and the CKShare via the embedded URL, I should be able to do further live-sync updates via CloudKit. If a user closes the document and re-opens it, they'd get the updates via iCloud Drive, so no need to apply any updates from before the document was opened. Does all this sound reasonable, or am I overlooking some gotcha? I'd appreciate any advice from people who have experience with this kind of syncing.

I have encountered an issue with a customer’s data access after they migrated to a different iCloud account, and I’m looking for guidance. The Situation: The customer was logged into their account on my app, which was associated with a specific iCloud account (iCloud A). They had all their app data available while using iCloud A. The customer then switched to a new iCloud account (iCloud B) on the same device, while still using the same app account. After switching iCloud accounts, their data is no longer visible in the app or my CloudKit dashboard. My Investigation: I accessed the customer’s CloudKit data via the CloudKit Console, acting as their iCloud account. I couldn’t find the private database zone or any of their records when accessing iCloud A through the console. I don’t believe the data was deleted since actions performed under iCloud B shouldn’t affect data stored in iCloud A. My Hypothesis: I suspect that the customer’s old iCloud account (iCloud A) may have downgraded or stopped paying for iCloud storage. If the iCloud subscription is inactive or expired, could that prevent me from accessing their CloudKit data? Would renewing the iCloud subscription for iCloud A restore access to the missing data? Questions: Does an unpaid or expired iCloud account restrict access to CloudKit records, even if they weren’t deleted? Would paying for iCloud storage again restore the data previously stored in CloudKit? Is there any way to recover the customer’s CloudKit data if they are unable to access their old iCloud account? If anyone has a simpler approach to recovering the customer’s iCloud-stored app data or has experience dealing with iCloud migrations like this, I’d appreciate your insights. Thank you in advance for any advice!