Background I have an established app in the App Store which has been using NSPersistentCloudkitContainer since iOS 13 without any issues. I've been running my app normally on an iOS device running the iOS 15 betas, mainly to see problems arise before my users see them. Ever since iOS 15 (beta 4) my app has failed to sync changes - no matter how small the change. An upload 'starts' but never completes. After a minute or so the app quits to the Home Screen and no useful information can be gleaned from crash reports. Until now I've had no idea what's going on. Possible Bug in the API? I've managed to replicate this behaviour on the simulator and on another device when building my app with Xcode 13 (beta 5) on iOS 15 (beta 5). It appears that NSPersistentCloudkitContainer has a memory leak and keeps ramping up the RAM consumption (and CPU at 100%) until the operating system kills the app. No code of mine is running. I'm not really an expert on these things and I tried to use Instruments to see if that would show me anything. It appears to be related to NSCloudkitMirroringDelegate getting 'stuck' somehow but I have no idea what to do with this information. My Core Data database is not tiny, but not massive by any means and NSPersistentCloudkitContainer has had no problems syncing to iCloud prior to iOS 15 (beta 4). If I restore my App Data (from an external backup file - 700MB with lots of many-many, many-one relationships, ckAssets, etc.) the data all gets added to Core Data without an issue at all. The console log (see below) then shows that a sync is created, scheduled & then started... but no data is uploaded. At this point the memory consumption starts and all I see is 'backgroundTask' warnings appear (only related to CloudKit) with no code of mine running. CoreData: CloudKit: CoreData+CloudKit: -[PFCloudKitExporter analyzeHistoryInStore:withManagedObjectContext:error:](501): <PFCloudKitExporter: 0x600000301450>: Exporting changes since (0): <NSPersistentHistoryToken - { "4B90A437-3D96-4AC9-A27A-E0F633CE5D9D" = 906; }> CoreData: CloudKit: CoreData+CloudKit: -[PFCloudKitExportContext processAnalyzedHistoryInStore:inManagedObjectContext:error:]_block_invoke_3(251): Finished processing analyzed history with 29501 metadata objects to create, 0 deleted rows without metadata. CoreData: CloudKit: CoreData+CloudKit: -[NSCloudKitMirroringDelegate _scheduleAutomatedExportWithLabel:activity:completionHandler:](2800): <NSCloudKitMirroringDelegate: 0x6000015515c0> - Beginning automated export - ExportActivity: <CKSchedulerActivity: 0x60000032c500; containerID=<CKContainerID: 0x600002ed3240; containerIdentifier=iCloud.com.nitramluap.Somnus, containerEnvironment="Sandbox">, identifier=com.apple.coredata.cloudkit.activity.export.4B90A437-3D96-4AC9-A27A-E0F633CE5D9D, priority=2, xpcActivityCriteriaOverrides={ Priority=Utility }> CoreData: CloudKit: CoreData+CloudKit: -[NSCloudKitMirroringDelegate executeMirroringRequest:error:](765): <NSCloudKitMirroringDelegate: 0x6000015515c0>: Asked to execute request: <NSCloudKitMirroringExportRequest: 0x600002ed2a30> CBE1852D-7793-46B6-8314-A681D2038B38 2021-08-13 08:41:01.518422+1000 Somnus[11058:671570] [BackgroundTask] Background Task 68 ("CoreData: CloudKit Export"), was created over 30 seconds ago. In applications running in the background, this creates a risk of termination. Remember to call UIApplication.endBackgroundTask(_:) for your task in a timely manner to avoid this. 2021-08-13 08:41:03.519455+1000 Somnus[11058:671570] [BackgroundTask] Background Task 154 ("CoreData: CloudKit Scheduling"), was created over 30 seconds ago. In applications running in the background, this creates a risk of termination. Remember to call UIApplication.endBackgroundTask(_:) for your task in a timely manner to avoid this. Just wondering if anyone else is having a similar issue? It never had a problem syncing an initial database restore prior to iOS 15 (beta 4) and the problems started right after installing iOS 15 (beta 4). I've submitted this to Apple Feedback and am awaiting a response (FB9412346). If this is unfixable I'm in real trouble (and my users are going to be livid). Thanks in advance!

I'm developing a SwiftUI app using SwiftData and encountering a persistent issue: Error Message: Thread 1: Fatal error: Duplicate keys of type 'Bland' were found in a Dictionary. This usually means either that the type violates Hashable's requirements, or that members of such a dictionary were mutated after insertion. Details: Occurrence: The error always occurs on the first launch of the app after installation. Specifically, it happens approximately 1 minute after the app starts. Inconsistent Behavior: Despite no changes to the code or server data, the error occurs inconsistently. Data Fetching Process: I fetch data for entities (Bland, CrossZansu, and Trade) from the server using the following process: Fetch Bland and CrossZansu entities via URLSession. Insert or update these entities into the SwiftData context. The fetched data is managed as follows: func refleshBlandsData() async throws { if let blandsOnServer = try await DataModel.shared.getBlands() { await MainActor.run { blandsOnServer.forEach { blandOnServer in if let blandOnLocal = blandList.first(where: { $0.code == blandOnServer.code }) { blandOnLocal.update(serverBland: blandOnServer) } else { modelContext.insert(blandOnServer.bland) } } } } } This is a simplified version of my StockListView. The blandList is a @Query property and dynamically retrieves data from SwiftData: struct StockListView: View { @Environment(\.modelContext) private var modelContext @Query(sort: \Bland.sname) var blandList: [Bland] @Query var users: [User] @State private var isNotLoaded = true @State private var isLoading = false @State private var loadingErrorState = "" var body: some View { NavigationStack { List { ForEach(blandList, id: \.self) { bland in NavigationLink(value: bland) { Text(bland.sname) } } } .navigationTitle("Stock List") .onAppear { doIfFirst() } } } // This function handles data loading when the app launches for the first time func doIfFirst() { if isNotLoaded { loadDataWithAnimationIfNotLoading() isNotLoaded = false } } // This function ensures data is loaded with an animation and avoids multiple triggers func loadDataWithAnimationIfNotLoading() { if !isLoading { isLoading = true Task { do { try await loadData() } catch { // Capture and store any errors during data loading loadingErrorState = "Data load failed: \(error.localizedDescription)" } isLoading = false } } } // Fetch data from the server and insert it into the SwiftData model context func loadData() async throws { if let blandsOnServer = try await DataModel.shared.getBlands() { for bland in blandsOnServer { // Avoid inserting duplicate keys by checking for existing items in blandList if !blandList.contains(where: { $0.code == bland.code }) { modelContext.insert(bland.bland) } } } } } Entity Definitions: Here are the main entities involved: Bland: @Model class Bland: Identifiable { @Attribute(.unique) var code: String var sname: String @Relationship(deleteRule: .cascade, inverse: \CrossZansu.bland) var zansuList: [CrossZansu] @Relationship(deleteRule: .cascade, inverse: \Trade.bland) var trades: [Trade] } CrossZansu: @Model class CrossZansu: Equatable { @Attribute(.unique) var id: String var bland: Bland? } Trade: @Model class Trade { @Relationship(deleteRule: .nullify) var user: User? var bland: Bland } User: class User { var id: UUID @Relationship(deleteRule: .cascade, inverse: \Trade.user) var trades: [Trade] } Observations: Error Context: The error occurs after the data is fetched and inserted into SwiftData. This suggests an issue with Hashable requirements or duplicate keys being inserted unintentionally. Concurrency Concerns: The fetch and update operations are performed in asynchronous tasks. Could this cause race conditions? Questions: Could this issue be related to how @Relationship and @Attribute(.unique) are managed in SwiftData? What are potential pitfalls with Equatable implementations (e.g., in CrossZansu) when used in SwiftData entities? Are there any recommended approaches for debugging "Duplicate keys" errors in SwiftData? Additional Info: Error Timing: The error occurs only during the app's first launch and consistently within the first minute.

I have been dealing with an error for almost 2 days now that caused my programme to crash on runtime with Thread 10: EXC_BAD_ACCESS (code=1, address=0x0) error , only when using Release mode. After many trial and errors and narrowing down the root problem I became suspicious to #Predicate and Generics being the root cause of the problem so I made these views to test it out. import SwiftUI import SwiftData struct DataBaseTestGeneric<Model : PersistentModel>: View { @State private var models: [Model] = [] var body: some View { viewLoader{ let reporter = Reporter() let pred = #Predicate<Model>{ model in return true } models = await reporter.fetch(pred) }content: { List{ ForEach(models){ model in Text("\(model.id)") } } } } } and a non-Generic version : import SwiftData struct DatabaseTest: View { @State private var transactions: [Transaction] = [] var body: some View { viewLoader { let reporter = Reporter() let pred = #Predicate<Transaction>{ dec in return true } let decs = await reporter.fetch(pred) transactions = decs }content:{ List{ ForEach(transactions){transaction in Text("\(transaction.id)") } } } } } to give you an insight viewLoader implentations is : struct viewLoader<Content : View>: View { var state : LoadingView.States = .loading let loadingTask : () async -> Void @State private var isLoading = true @ViewBuilder var content : Content var body: some View { if isLoading{ LoadingView(state) .task { await Task.detached(priority:.high){ await loadingTask() }.value isLoading = false } }else{ content } } } and I am accessing SwiftData using a background thread ( by implementing @ModelActor . the problem is that the code always crash on runtime when I am trying to fetch the data using reporter.fetch function. To make things even more weird I have to add the fact that Reporter class also have another function called fetchAll as follow : func fetchAll<T>(_ model : T.Type) async -> [T] where T : PersistentModel { let desc = FetchDescriptor<T>() let result = try? await context.fetch(desc) guard let result else { assertionFailure("Error fetching \(model) from context") return [] } return result } if i replace this function with reporter.fetch (which takes a predicate) the code will not crash either with or without using Generics , which brings me to the point that #Predicate is causing mayhem somehow ! PS: I am using Xcode Version 16.1 (16B40) , on macOs Sequoia Version 15.2 Beta (24C5089c)

I have an app that uses SwiftData with CloudKit to synchronize data across a users devices. I'm able to replicate data created on one device on another and when removing data, it is also removed on the other device. So, I know that SwiftData and CloudKit are configured correctly. What I'd like to do though, is to ensure that if a user installs the app on an additional device, that the data is synchronized upon app start. When testing my app on a third device, via TestFlight, there was no data in the app upon launch even though all three devices are using the same Apple account (e.g. Apple ID). What is the best way to achieve this?

As far as I can tell, there’s no equivalent to Core Data’s NSFetchedResultsController in SwiftData. It would be very helpful to have a way to respond to sets of changes in a ModelContext outside of a SwiftUI view. For instance, this is very helpful when using a Model-View-ViewModel architecture. The @Query property wrapper is great for use in a SwiftUI view, but sometimes it’s helpful to process data outside of the view itself. The fetch() method on ModelContext is helpful for one-time operations, but as far as I can't tell it doesn't address receiving changes on an ongoing basis. Am I missing some equivalent for this use case? Also filed as feedback FB12288916

Hi, I've been using Core Data + CloudKit via NSPersistentCloudKitContainer for several years now. Back then I just created my Core Data AND CloudKit fields by hand. Now the time has come for a little lightweight migration to a new Core Data model, let's say I just needed to add one String attribute. So I've done the Core Data local migration as usual, then added this to container code: try? persistentContainer.initializeCloudKitSchema(options: NSPersistentCloudKitContainerSchemaInitializationOptions()) Run. And everything worked great. but… Now I've noticed that CloudKit created new CKAsset fields for each String attribute that I had in Core Data (about 5 new CKAsset fields). Is this normal!? Why? ! Is it safe to deploy these changes to prod? ty. ChatGPT said: "This field is used internally by CloudKit to handle large string values. If the string value is small enough, it is stored in the normal String field, but if it exceeds the size limit (about 1KB), the string is automatically stored as a CKAsset."

I'm building a macOS + iOS SwiftUI app using Xcode 14.1b3 on a Mac running macOS 13.b11. The app uses Core Data + CloudKit. With development builds, CloudKit integration works on the Mac app and the iOS app. Existing records are fetched from iCloud, and new records are uploaded to iCloud. Everybody's happy. With TestFlight builds, the iOS app has no problems. But CloudKit integration isn't working in the Mac app at all. No existing records are fetched, no new records are uploaded. In the Console, I see this message: error: CoreData+CloudKit: Failed to set up CloudKit integration for store: <NSSQLCore: 0x1324079e0> (URL: <local file url>) Error Domain=NSCocoaErrorDomain Code=4099 "The connection to service named com.apple.cloudd was invalidated: failed at lookup with error 159 - Sandbox restriction." UserInfo={NSDebugDescription=The connection to service named com.apple.cloudd was invalidated: failed at lookup with error 159 - Sandbox restriction.} I thought it might be that I was missing the com.apple.security.network.client entitlement, but adding that didn't help. Any suggestions what I might be missing? (It's my first sandboxed Mac app, so it might be really obvious to anyone but me.)

Since publishing new record types to my CloudKit schema in production, a previously unchanged record type has stopped indexing new records. While records of this type are successfully saved without errors, they are not returned in query results—they can only be accessed directly via their recordName. This issue occurs exclusively in the Production environment, both in the CloudKit Console and our iOS app. The problem began on July 21, 2025, and continues to persist. The issue affects only new records of this specific record type; all other types are indexing and querying as expected. The affected record's fields are properly configured with the appropriate index types (e.g., QUERYABLE) and have been not been modified prior to publishing the schema. With this, are there any steps I should take to restore indexing functionality for this record type in Production? There have been new records inserted, and I would prefer to not have to reset the production database, if possible.

Hi, would it be possible that instead of crashing when calling fetchHistory that function simply throws an error instead? fetchHistory seems to crash when it cannot understand the models if they are not compatible etc… which is understandable, but it makes it really difficult to handle and debug, there's not a lot of details, and honestly I would just rather that it throws an error and let me ignore a history entry that might be useless rather than crashing the entire app. Thank you!

Hello Devs, I'm encountering a persistent INTERNAL_ERROR (HTTP 500) when making Server-to-Server API calls to CloudKit, specifically when trying to hit the /users/current endpoint, even after meticulously verifying all client-side components. I'm hoping someone might have insight into what could cause this. Context: Goal: Authenticate to CloudKit from a Vercel Serverless Function (Node.js) to perform operations like record queries. Problem Endpoint: POST https://api.apple-cloudkit.com/database/1/iCloud.com.dannybaseball.Danny-Baseball/production/public/users/current Key Generation Method: Using the CloudKit Dashboard's "Tokens &amp; Keys" -&gt; "New Server-to-Server Key" flow, where I generate the private key using openssl ecparam -name prime256v1 -genkey -noout -out mykey.pem, then extract the public key using openssl ec -in mykey.pem -pubout, and paste the public key material (between BEGIN/END markers) into the dashboard. The private key was then converted to PKCS#8 format using openssl pkcs8 -topk8 -nocrypt -in mykey.pem -out mykey_pkcs8.pem. Current Setup Being Tested (in a Vercel Node.js function): CLOUDKIT_CONTAINER: iCloud.com.dannybaseball.Danny-Baseball CLOUDKIT_KEY_ID: 9368dddf141ce9bc0da743b9f69bc3eda132b9bb3e62a4167e428d4f320b656e (This is the Key ID generated from the CloudKit Dashboard for the public key I provided). CLOUDKIT_P8_KEY (Environment Variable): Contains the base64 encoded string of the entire content of my PKCS#8 formatted private key file. Key Processing in Code: const p8Base64 = process.env.CLOUDKIT_P8_KEY; const privateKeyPEM = Buffer.from(p8Base64, 'base64').toString('utf8'); // This privateKeyPEM string starts with "-----BEGIN PRIVATE KEY-----" and ends with "-----END PRIVATE KEY-----" const privateKey = crypto.createPrivateKey({ key: privateKeyPEM, format: 'pem' }); // This line SUCCEEDS without DECODER errors in my Vercel function logs. Use code with caution. JavaScript Request Body for /users/current: "{}" Signing String (message = Date:BodyHash:Path): Date: Correct ISO8601 format (e.g., "2025-05-21T19:38:11.886Z") BodyHash: Correct SHA256 hash of "{}", then Base64 encoded (e.g., "RBNvo1WzZ4oRRq0W9+hknpT7T8If536DEMBg9hyq/4o=") Path: Exactly /database/1/iCloud.com.dannybaseball.Danny-Baseball/production/public/users/current Headers: X-Apple-CloudKit-Request-KeyID: Set to the correct Key ID. X-Apple-CloudKit-Request-ISO8601Date: Set to the date used in the signature. X-Apple-CloudKit-Request-SignatureV1: Set to the generated signature. X-Apple-CloudKit-Environment: "production" Content-Type: "application/json" Observed Behavior &amp; Logs: The Node.js crypto.createPrivateKey call successfully parses the decoded PEM key in my Vercel function. The request is sent to CloudKit. CloudKit responds with HTTP 500 and the following JSON body (UUID varies per request): { "uuid": "xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx", "serverErrorCode": "INTERNAL_ERROR" } Use code with caution. Json This happens consistently. Previously, with other key pairs or different P8 processing attempts, I was getting AUTHENTICATION_FAILED (401) or local DECODER errors. Now that the key parsing is successful on my end with this current key pair and setup, I'm hitting this INTERNAL_ERROR. Troubleshooting Done: Verified Key ID (9368dddf...) is correct and corresponds to the key generated via CloudKit Dashboard. Verified Container ID (iCloud.com.dannybaseball.Danny-Baseball) is correct. Successfully parsed the private key from the environment variable (after base64 decoding) within the Vercel function. Meticulously checked the signing string components (Date, BodyHash, Path) against Apple's documentation. Path format is /database/1////. Ensured all required headers are present with correct values. Local Node.js tests (bypassing Vercel but using the same key data and signing logic) also result in this INTERNAL_ERROR. Question: What could cause CloudKit to return an INTERNAL_ERROR (500) for a /users/current request when the client-side key parsing is successful and all request components (path, body hash for signature, date, headers) appear to conform exactly to the Server-to-Server Web Services Reference? Are there any known subtle issues with EC keys generated via openssl ecparam (and then converted to PKCS#8) that might lead to this, even if crypto.createPrivateKey parses them in Node.js? Could there be an issue with my specific Key ID or container that would manifest this way, requiring Apple intervention? Any insights or suggestions would be greatly appreciated. I can provide more detailed logs of the request components if needed. Thank you!

Hi all, I’m encountering a consistent issue with SwiftData on watchOS when using CloudKit sync. After enabling: let config = ModelConfiguration(schema: schema, cloudKitDatabase: .automatic) …the app terminates ~30–60 seconds into a WKExtendedRuntimeSession. This happens specifically when: Always-On Display is OFF The iPhone is disconnected or in Airplane Mode The app is running in a WKExtendedRuntimeSession (e.g., used for meditation tracking) The Xcode logs show a warning: Background Task ("CoreData: CloudKit Setup"), was created over 30 seconds ago. In applications running in the background, this creates a risk of termination. It appears CloudKit sync setup is being triggered automatically and flagged by the system as an unmanaged long-running task, leading to termination. Workaround: Switching to: let config = ModelConfiguration(schema: schema, cloudKitDatabase: .none) …prevents the issue entirely — no background task warning, no crash. Feedback ID submitted: FB17685611 Just wanted to check if others have seen this behavior or found alternative solutions. It seems like something Apple may need to address in SwiftData’s CloudKit handling on watchOS.

I see a chunk load error in the browser console. I already reported this: FB17664487

Starting 20th March 2025, I see an increase in bandwidth and latency for one of my CloudKit projects. I'm using NSPersistentCloudKitContainer to synchronise my data. I haven't changed any CloudKit scheme during that time but shipped an update. Since then, I reverted some changes from that update, which could have led to changes in the sync behaviour. Is anyone else seeing any issues? I would love to file a DTS and use one of my credits for that, but unfortunately, I can't because I cannot reproduce it with a demo project because I cannot travel back in time and check if it also has an increase in metrics during that time. Maybe an Apple engineer can green-light me filing a DTS request, please.

I'm calling a method with the context as parameter, within the context's perform block – is this really not legal in Swift 6? actor MyActor { func bar(context: NSManagedObjectContext) { /* some code */ } func foo(context: NSManagedObjectContext) { context.performAndWait { self.bar(context: context) // WARN: Sending 'context' risks causing data races; this is an error in the Swift 6 language mode // 'self'-isolated 'context' is captured by a actor-isolated closure. actor-isolated uses in closure may race against later nonisolated uses // Access can happen concurrently } } } The warning appears when I call a method with a context parameter, within the performAndWait-block. Background: In my app I have methods that takes in API data, and I need to call the same methods from multiple places with the same context to store it, and I do not want to copy paste the code and have hundreds of lines of duplicate code. Is there a well-known "this is how you should do it" for situations like this? This is related to a previous post I made, but it's a bit flimsy and got no response: https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/770605

I've already submitted this as a bug report to Apple, but I am posting here so others can save themselves some troubleshooting. This is submitted as FB14337982 with an attached complete Xcode project to replicate. In iOS 17 we use a ModelActor to download data which is saved as an Event, and then save it to SwiftData with a relationship to a Location. In iOS 18 22A5307d we are seeing that this code no longer persists the relationship to the Location, but still saves the Event. If we put a breakpoint in that ModelActor we see that the object graph is correct within the ModelActor stack trace at the time we call modelContext.save(). However, after saving, the relationship is missing from the default.store SQLite file, and of course from the app UI. Here is a toy example showing how inserting an Employee into a Company using a ModelActor gives unexpected results in iOS 18 22A5307d but works as expected in iOS 17. It appears that no relationships data survives being saved in a ModelActor.ModelContext. Also note there seems to be a return of the old bug that saving this data in the ModelActor does not update the @Query in the UI in iOS 18 but does so in iOS 17. Models @Model final class Employee { var uuid: UUID = UUID() @Relationship(deleteRule: .nullify) public var company: Company? /// For a concise display @Transient var name: String { self.uuid.uuidString.components(separatedBy: "-").first ?? "NIL" } init(company: Company?) { self.company = company } } @Model final class Company { var uuid: UUID = UUID() @Relationship(deleteRule: .cascade, inverse: \Employee.company) public var employees: [Employee]? = [] /// For a concise display @Transient var name: String { self.uuid.uuidString.components(separatedBy: "-").first ?? "NIL" } init() { } } ModelActor import OSLog private let logger = Logger(subsystem: Bundle.main.bundleIdentifier!, category: "SimpleModelActor") @ModelActor final actor SimpleModelActor { func addEmployeeTo(CompanyWithID companyID: PersistentIdentifier?) { guard let companyID, let company: Company = self[companyID, as: Company.self] else { logger.error("Could not get a company") return } let newEmployee = Employee(company: company) modelContext.insert(newEmployee) logger.notice("Created employee \(newEmployee.name) in Company \(newEmployee.company?.name ?? "NIL")") try! modelContext.save() } } ContentView import OSLog private let logger = Logger(subsystem: Bundle.main.bundleIdentifier!, category: "View") struct ContentView: View { @Environment(\.modelContext) private var modelContext @Query private var companies: [Company] @Query private var employees: [Employee] @State private var simpleModelActor: SimpleModelActor! var body: some View { ScrollView { LazyVStack { DisclosureGroup("Instructions") { Text(""" Instructions: 1. In iOS 17, tap Add in View. Observe that an employee is added with Company matching the shown company name. 2. In iOS 18 beta (22A5307d), tap Add in ModelActor. Note that the View does not update (bug 1). Note in the XCode console that an Employee was created with a relationship to a Company. 3. Open the default.store SQLite file and observe that the created Employee does not have a Company relationship (bug 2). The relationship was not saved. 4. Tap Add in View. The same code is now executed in a Button closure. Note in the XCode console again that an Employee was created with a relationship to a Company. The View now updates showing both the previously created Employee with NIL company, and the View-created employee with the expected company. """) .font(.footnote) } .padding() Section("**Companies**") { ForEach(companies) { company in Text(company.name) } } .padding(.bottom) Section("**Employees**") { ForEach(employees) { employee in Text("Employee \(employee.name) in company \(employee.company?.name ?? "NIL")") } } Button("Add in View") { let newEmployee = Employee(company: companies.first) modelContext.insert(newEmployee) logger.notice("Created employee \(newEmployee.name) in Company \(newEmployee.company?.name ?? "NIL")") try! modelContext.save() } .buttonStyle(.bordered) Button("Add in ModelActor") { Task { await simpleModelActor.addEmployeeTo(CompanyWithID: companies.first?.persistentModelID) } } .buttonStyle(.bordered) } } .onAppear { simpleModelActor = SimpleModelActor(modelContainer: modelContext.container) if companies.isEmpty { let newCompany = Company() modelContext.insert(newCompany) try! modelContext.save() } } } }

What is the idiomatic way to use a ModelContext in a document based SwiftData app from a background thread? The relevant DocumentGroup initializers do not give us direct access to a ModelContainer, only to a ModelContext. Is it safe to take its modelContext.container and pass it around (for creating a ModelContext on it on a background thread) or to construct a ModelActor with it? Is it safe to e.g. put a ModelActor so created into the environment of the root view of the window and execute various async data operations on it in Tasks throughout the app, as long as these are dispatched from within the window whose root view's ModelContext was used for getting the ModelContainer?

Hi everyone, We’re currently using CKSyncEngine to sync all our locally persisted data across user devices (iOS and macOS) via iCloud. We’ve noticed something strange and reproducible: On iOS, when the CKSyncEngine is initialized with manual sync behavior, both manual calls to fetchChanges() and sendChanges() happen nearly instantly (usually within seconds). Automatic syncing is also very fast. On macOS, when the CKSyncEngine is initialized with manual sync behavior, fetchChanges() and sendChanges() are also fast and responsive. However, once CKSyncEngine is initialized with automatic syncing enabled on macOS: sendChanges() still appears to transmit changes immediately. But automatic fetching becomes significantly slower — often taking minutes to pick up changes from the cloud, even when new data is already available. Even manual calls to fetchChanges() behave as if they’re throttled or delayed, rather than performing an immediate fetch. Our questions: Is this delay in automatic (and post-automatic manual) fetch behavior on macOS expected, or possibly a bug? Are there specific macOS constraints that impact CKSyncEngine differently than on iOS? Once CKSyncEngine has been initialized in automatic mode, is fetchChanges() no longer treated as a truly manual trigger? Is there a recommended workaround to enable fast sync behavior on macOS — for example, by sticking to manual sync configuration and triggering sync using a CKSubscription-based mechanism when remote changes occur? Any guidance, clarification, or experiences from other developers (or Apple engineers) would be greatly appreciated — especially regarding maintaining parity between iOS and macOS sync performance. Thanks in advance!

I have a Core Data app on the App Store that places its persistent store in the default location within the Application Support directory. At some point, I add widgets to the app while utilizing SwiftData. I create a widget extension and the app group to link both targets. I migrate my persistent store from the default location to the app group container directory. Now, the SwiftData code pointing to the shared container in the widget extension can query data. Here's the sample project for illustration up to this point. Then, I decided to get rid of the Core Data code entirely. Move everything in the main target to SwiftData. I need to keep my persistence controller object, however, because I can never assume that the entirety of my user base has migrated. I do need to ditch the Core Data model file. Otherwise, my new SwiftData models would conflict with the auto-generated ones from that file. But once I do that, my migration code breaks. I can't set up a persistent container without the model. And I need the container for migration. SwiftData has no native interface to migrate the store to a new location. There is a line in the documentation stating that the framework copies the store to an app group container automatically. But I wasn't able to verify that claim.

The following complex migration consistently crashes the app with the following error: SwiftData/PersistentModel.swift:726: Fatal error: What kind of backing data is this? SwiftData._KKMDBackingData<SwiftDataMigration.ItemSchemaV1.ItemList> My app relies on a complex migration that involves these optional 1 to n relationships. Theoretically I could not assign the relationships in the willMigrate block but afterwards I am not able to tell which list and items belonged together. Steps to reproduce: Run project Change typealias CurrentSchema to ItemSchemaV2 instead of ItemSchemaV1. Run project again -> App crashes My setup: Xcode Version 16.2 (16C5032a) MacOS Sequoia 15.4 iPhone 12 with 18.3.2 (22D82) Am I doing something wrong or did I stumble upon a bug? I have a demo Xcode project ready but I could not upload it here so I put the code below. Thanks for your help typealias CurrentSchema = ItemSchemaV1 typealias ItemList = CurrentSchema.ItemList typealias Item = CurrentSchema.Item @main struct SwiftDataMigrationApp: App { var sharedModelContainer: ModelContainer = { do { return try ModelContainer(for: ItemList.self, migrationPlan: MigrationPlan.self) } catch { fatalError("Could not create ModelContainer: \(error)") } }() var body: some Scene { WindowGroup { ContentView() } .modelContainer(sharedModelContainer) } } This is the migration plan enum MigrationPlan: SchemaMigrationPlan { static var schemas: [any VersionedSchema.Type] { [ItemSchemaV1.self, ItemSchemaV2.self] } static var stages: [MigrationStage] = [ MigrationStage.custom(fromVersion: ItemSchemaV1.self, toVersion: ItemSchemaV2.self, willMigrate: { context in print("Started migration") let oldlistItems = try context.fetch(FetchDescriptor<ItemSchemaV1.ItemList>()) for list in oldlistItems { let items = list.items.map { ItemSchemaV2.Item(timestamp: $0.timestamp)} let newList = ItemSchemaV2.ItemList(items: items, name: list.name, note: "This is a new property") context.insert(newList) context.delete(list) } try context.save() // Crash indicated here print("Finished willMigrate") }, didMigrate: { context in print("Did migrate successfully") }) ] } The versioned schemas enum ItemSchemaV1: VersionedSchema { static var versionIdentifier = Schema.Version(1, 0, 0) static var models: [any PersistentModel.Type] { [Item.self] } @Model final class Item { var timestamp: Date var list: ItemSchemaV1.ItemList? init(timestamp: Date) { self.timestamp = timestamp } } @Model final class ItemList { @Relationship(deleteRule: .cascade, inverse: \ItemSchemaV1.Item.list) var items: [Item] var name: String init(items: [Item], name: String) { self.items = items self.name = name } } } enum ItemSchemaV2: VersionedSchema { static var versionIdentifier = Schema.Version(2, 0, 0) static var models: [any PersistentModel.Type] { [Item.self] } @Model final class Item { var timestamp: Date var list: ItemSchemaV2.ItemList? init(timestamp: Date) { self.timestamp = timestamp } } @Model final class ItemList { @Relationship(deleteRule: .cascade, inverse: \ItemSchemaV2.Item.list) var items: [Item] var name: String var note: String init(items: [Item], name: String, note: String = "") { self.items = items self.name = name self.note = note } } } Last the ContentView: struct ContentView: View { @Query private var itemLists: [ItemList] var body: some View { NavigationSplitView { List { ForEach(itemLists) { list in NavigationLink { List(list.items) { item in Text(item.timestamp.formatted(date: .abbreviated, time: .complete)) } .navigationTitle(list.name) } label: { Text(list.name) } } } .navigationTitle("Crashing migration demo") .onAppear { if itemLists.isEmpty { for index in 0..<10 { let items = [Item(timestamp: Date.now)] let listItem = ItemList(items: items, name: "List No. \(index)") modelContext.insert(listItem) } try! modelContext.save() } } } detail: { Text("Select an item") } } }

Hello, I’m upgrading my app from Core Data to SwiftData. Due to my old setup the Core Data store has an explicitly name like „Something.sqlite“, because it was defined via NSPersistentContainer(name: "Something") before switching to SwiftData. Now my goal is to migrate the Core Data stack to SwiftData, while moving it to an App Group (for Widget support) as well as enable iCloud sync via CloudKit. Working Migration without App Group & CloudKit I’ve managed to get my migration running without migrating it to an App Group and CloudKit support like so: @main struct MyAppName: App { let container: ModelContainer init() { // Legacy placement of the Core Data file. let dataUrl = URL.applicationSupportDirectory.appending(path: "Something.sqlite") do { // Create SwiftData container with migration and custom URL pointing to legacy Core Data file container = try ModelContainer( for: Foo.self, Bar.self, migrationPlan: MigrationPlan.self, configurations: ModelConfiguration(url: dataUrl)) } catch { fatalError("Failed to initialize model container.") } } var body: some Scene { WindowGroup { ContentView() } .modelContainer(container) } } How To Migrate to App Group & CloudKit? I’ve already tried to use the ModelConfiguration with a name, but it seems to only look for a .store file and thus doesn’t copy over the Core Data contents. let fullSchema = Schema([Foo.self, Bar.self]) let configuration = ModelConfiguration("Something", schema: fullSchema) Can someone help me how to do this migration or point me into the right direction? I can’t find anything relating this kind of migration …