Hello, I am currently developing an application that requires barcode scanning using Apple’s Vision framework (VNBarcodeSymbology). I noticed that the framework supports several GS1 DataBar symbologies, such as: VNBarcodeSymbology.gs1DataBar VNBarcodeSymbology.gs1DataBarExpanded VNBarcodeSymbology.gs1DataBarLimited However, I could not find any explicit reference to support for GS1 DataBar Stacked (both regular and expanded variants). Could you confirm whether GS1 DataBar Stacked is currently supported in VisionKit's DataScannerViewController or VNBarcodeObservation? If not, are there any plans to include support for this symbology in a future iOS update? This functionality is critical for my use case, as GS1 DataBar Stacked barcodes are widely used in retail, pharmaceuticals, and logistics, where space constraints prevent the use of standard GS1 DataBar formats. I appreciate any clarification on this matter and would be happy to provide additional details if needed.

I'm working on my Swift Student Challenge submission and developing a Vision framework-based image classifier. I want to ensure I'm following best practices for training data and follow to guidelines for what images I use to train my image classifier. What types of images can I use for training my model? Are there specific image databases or resources recommended by Apple that are safe to use for Swift Student Challenge submissions? Currently considering images used from wikipedia, and my own images

I am trying to run TinyLlama directly using Swift Playgrounds for iOS. I have tried multiple solutions, like libraries (LLM.swift, swift-transformers, ...) which never worked due to import issues, and also tried importing an exported mlmodel. For the later, I followed the article about Llama 3.1 on CoreML. It was hard to understand how to do the inference with it, but I was able to export a mlpackage, that I then placed in a xcode project to generate the mlmodelc (compiled model) and the model class. I had to go with the first version described in the article, without optimizations, as I got errors during model loading with the flexible input shapes. I was able to run the model for one token generation. But my biggest problem is that, though the mlmodelc is only 550 MiB, th model loads 24+GiB of memory, largely exceeding what I can have on an iOS device. Is there a way to use do LLM inferences on Swift Playgrounds at a reasonable speed (even 1 token / s would be sufficient)?

Hello! I have a swift program that tracks the location of a ball (through the back camera). It seems to be working fine, but the only issue is the run time, particularly my concatenate, normalize, and argmax functions, which are meant to be a 1 to 1 copy of the PyTorch argmax function and the following python lines: imgs = np.concatenate((img, img_prev, img_preprev), axis=2) imgs = imgs.astype(np.float32)/255.0 imgs = np.rollaxis(imgs, 2, 0) inp = np.expand_dims(imgs, axis=0) # used to pass into model However, I need my program to run in real time and in an ideal world, I want it to run way under real time. Below is a run down of the run times that result from my code: Starting model inference Setup took: 0.0 seconds Resize took: 0.03741896152496338 seconds Concatenation took: 0.3359949588775635 seconds Normalization took: 0.9906361103057861 seconds Model prediction took: 0.3425499200820923 seconds Argmax took: 28.17007803916931 seconds Postprocess took: 0.054128050804138184 seconds Model inference took 29.934185028076172 seconds Here are the concatenateBuffers, normalizeBuffers, and argmax functions that I use: func concatenateBuffers(_ buffers: [CVPixelBuffer?]) -> CVPixelBuffer? { guard buffers.count == 3, let first = buffers[0] else { return nil } let width = CVPixelBufferGetWidth(first) let height = CVPixelBufferGetHeight(first) let targetChannels = 9 var concatenated: CVPixelBuffer? let attrs = [kCVPixelBufferCGImageCompatibilityKey: kCFBooleanTrue] as CFDictionary CVPixelBufferCreate(kCFAllocatorDefault, width, height, kCVPixelFormatType_32BGRA, attrs, &concatenated) guard let output = concatenated else { return nil } CVPixelBufferLockBaseAddress(output, []) defer { CVPixelBufferUnlockBaseAddress(output, []) } guard let outputData = CVPixelBufferGetBaseAddress(output) else { return nil } let outputPtr = UnsafeMutablePointer<UInt8>(OpaquePointer(outputData)) // Lock all input buffers at once buffers.forEach { buffer in guard let buffer = buffer else { return } CVPixelBufferLockBaseAddress(buffer, .readOnly) } defer { buffers.forEach { CVPixelBufferUnlockBaseAddress($0!, .readOnly) } } // Process each input buffer for (frameIdx, buffer) in buffers.enumerated() { guard let buffer = buffer, let inputData = CVPixelBufferGetBaseAddress(buffer) else { continue } let inputPtr = UnsafePointer<UInt8>(OpaquePointer(inputData)) let bytesPerRow = CVPixelBufferGetBytesPerRow(buffer) let totalPixels = width * height // Process all pixels in one go for this frame for i in 0..<totalPixels { let y = i / width let x = i % width let inputOffset = y * bytesPerRow + x * 4 let outputOffset = i * targetChannels + frameIdx * 3 // BGR order to match numpy outputPtr[outputOffset] = inputPtr[inputOffset + 2] // B outputPtr[outputOffset + 1] = inputPtr[inputOffset + 1] // G outputPtr[outputOffset + 2] = inputPtr[inputOffset] // R } } return output } func normalizeBuffer(_ buffer: CVPixelBuffer?) -> MLMultiArray? { guard let input = buffer else { return nil } let width = CVPixelBufferGetWidth(input) let height = CVPixelBufferGetHeight(input) let channels = 9 CVPixelBufferLockBaseAddress(input, .readOnly) defer { CVPixelBufferUnlockBaseAddress(input, .readOnly) } guard let inputData = CVPixelBufferGetBaseAddress(input) else { return nil } let shape = [1, NSNumber(value: channels), NSNumber(value: height), NSNumber(value: width)] guard let output = try? MLMultiArray(shape: shape, dataType: .float32) else { return nil } let inputPtr = inputData.assumingMemoryBound(to: UInt8.self) let bytesPerRow = CVPixelBufferGetBytesPerRow(input) let ptr = UnsafeMutablePointer<Float>(OpaquePointer(output.dataPointer)) let totalSize = width * height for c in 0..<channels { for idx in 0..<totalSize { let h = idx / width let w = idx % width let inputIdx = h * bytesPerRow + w * channels + c ptr[c * totalSize + idx] = Float(inputPtr[inputIdx]) / 255.0 } } return output } func argmax(_ array: MLMultiArray) -> MLMultiArray? { let shape = array.shape.map { $0.intValue } guard shape.count == 3, shape[0] == 1, shape[1] == 256, shape[2] == 230400 else { return nil } guard let output = try? MLMultiArray(shape: [1, NSNumber(value: 230400)], dataType: .int32) else { return nil } let ptr = UnsafePointer<Float>(OpaquePointer(array.dataPointer)) let outputPtr = UnsafeMutablePointer<Int32>(OpaquePointer(output.dataPointer)) let channelSize = 230400 for pos in 0..<230400 { var maxValue = -Float.infinity var maxIndex: Int32 = 0 for channel in 0..<256 { let value = ptr[channel * channelSize + pos] if value > maxValue { maxValue = value maxIndex = Int32(channel) } } outputPtr[pos] = maxIndex } return output } Are there any glaring areas of inefficiencies that can be reduced to allow for under real time processing whilst following the same logic as found in the python code exactly? Would using Obj-C speed things up for some reason? Are there any tools I can use so I don't have to write these functions myself? Additionally, in the classes init, function, I tried to check the compute units being used since I feel 0.34 seconds for a singular model prediction is also far too long, but no print statements are showing for some reason: init() { guard let loadedModel = try? BallTrackerModel() else { fatalError("Could not load model") } let config = MLModelConfiguration() config.computeUnits = .all guard let configuredModel = try? BallTrackerModel(configuration: config) else { fatalError("Could not configure model") } self.model = configuredModel print("model loaded with compute units \(config.computeUnits.rawValue)") } Thanks!

Hey everyone, I want to add an if statement that would do something along the lines of this: if confidence = 100% { } How could I do this? I already have a createML model. Thank you, Oliver

Hello! I have a TrackNet model that I have converted to CoreML (.mlpackage) using coremltools, and the conversion process appears to go smoothly as I get the .mlpackage file I am looking for with the weights and model.mlmodel file in the folder. However, when I drag it into Xcode, it just shows up as 4 script tags (as pictured) instead of the model "interface" that is typically expected. I initially was concerned that my model was not compatible with CoreML, but upon logging the conversions, everything seems to be converted properly. I have some code that may be relevant in debugging this issue: How I use the model: model = BallTrackerNet() # this is the model architecture which will be referenced later device = self.device # cpu model.load_state_dict(torch.load("models/balltrackerbest.pt", map_location=device)) # balltrackerbest is the weights model = model.to(device) model.eval() Here is the BallTrackerNet() model itself: import torch.nn as nn import torch class ConvBlock(nn.Module): def __init__(self, in_channels, out_channels, kernel_size=3, pad=1, stride=1, bias=True): super().__init__() self.block = nn.Sequential( nn.Conv2d(in_channels, out_channels, kernel_size, stride=stride, padding=pad, bias=bias), nn.ReLU(), nn.BatchNorm2d(out_channels) ) def forward(self, x): return self.block(x) class BallTrackerNet(nn.Module): def __init__(self, out_channels=256): super().__init__() self.out_channels = out_channels self.conv1 = ConvBlock(in_channels=9, out_channels=64) self.conv2 = ConvBlock(in_channels=64, out_channels=64) self.pool1 = nn.MaxPool2d(kernel_size=2, stride=2) self.conv3 = ConvBlock(in_channels=64, out_channels=128) self.conv4 = ConvBlock(in_channels=128, out_channels=128) self.pool2 = nn.MaxPool2d(kernel_size=2, stride=2) self.conv5 = ConvBlock(in_channels=128, out_channels=256) self.conv6 = ConvBlock(in_channels=256, out_channels=256) self.conv7 = ConvBlock(in_channels=256, out_channels=256) self.pool3 = nn.MaxPool2d(kernel_size=2, stride=2) self.conv8 = ConvBlock(in_channels=256, out_channels=512) self.conv9 = ConvBlock(in_channels=512, out_channels=512) self.conv10 = ConvBlock(in_channels=512, out_channels=512) self.ups1 = nn.Upsample(scale_factor=2) self.conv11 = ConvBlock(in_channels=512, out_channels=256) self.conv12 = ConvBlock(in_channels=256, out_channels=256) self.conv13 = ConvBlock(in_channels=256, out_channels=256) self.ups2 = nn.Upsample(scale_factor=2) self.conv14 = ConvBlock(in_channels=256, out_channels=128) self.conv15 = ConvBlock(in_channels=128, out_channels=128) self.ups3 = nn.Upsample(scale_factor=2) self.conv16 = ConvBlock(in_channels=128, out_channels=64) self.conv17 = ConvBlock(in_channels=64, out_channels=64) self.conv18 = ConvBlock(in_channels=64, out_channels=self.out_channels) self.softmax = nn.Softmax(dim=1) self._init_weights() def forward(self, x, testing=False): batch_size = x.size(0) x = self.conv1(x) x = self.conv2(x) x = self.pool1(x) x = self.conv3(x) x = self.conv4(x) x = self.pool2(x) x = self.conv5(x) x = self.conv6(x) x = self.conv7(x) x = self.pool3(x) x = self.conv8(x) x = self.conv9(x) x = self.conv10(x) x = self.ups1(x) x = self.conv11(x) x = self.conv12(x) x = self.conv13(x) x = self.ups2(x) x = self.conv14(x) x = self.conv15(x) x = self.ups3(x) x = self.conv16(x) x = self.conv17(x) x = self.conv18(x) # x = self.softmax(x) out = x.reshape(batch_size, self.out_channels, -1) if testing: out = self.softmax(out) return out def _init_weights(self): for module in self.modules(): if isinstance(module, nn.Conv2d): nn.init.uniform_(module.weight, -0.05, 0.05) if module.bias is not None: nn.init.constant_(module.bias, 0) elif isinstance(module, nn.BatchNorm2d): nn.init.constant_(module.weight, 1) nn.init.constant_(module.bias, 0) Here is also the meta data of my model: [ { "metadataOutputVersion" : "3.0", "storagePrecision" : "Float16", "outputSchema" : [ { "hasShapeFlexibility" : "0", "isOptional" : "0", "dataType" : "Float32", "formattedType" : "MultiArray (Float32 1 × 256 × 230400)", "shortDescription" : "", "shape" : "[1, 256, 230400]", "name" : "var_462", "type" : "MultiArray" } ], "modelParameters" : [ ], "specificationVersion" : 6, "mlProgramOperationTypeHistogram" : { "Cast" : 2, "Conv" : 18, "Relu" : 18, "BatchNorm" : 18, "Reshape" : 1, "UpsampleNearestNeighbor" : 3, "MaxPool" : 3 }, "computePrecision" : "Mixed (Float16, Float32, Int32)", "isUpdatable" : "0", "availability" : { "macOS" : "12.0", "tvOS" : "15.0", "visionOS" : "1.0", "watchOS" : "8.0", "iOS" : "15.0", "macCatalyst" : "15.0" }, "modelType" : { "name" : "MLModelType_mlProgram" }, "userDefinedMetadata" : { "com.github.apple.coremltools.source_dialect" : "TorchScript", "com.github.apple.coremltools.source" : "torch==2.5.1", "com.github.apple.coremltools.version" : "8.1" }, "inputSchema" : [ { "hasShapeFlexibility" : "0", "isOptional" : "0", "dataType" : "Float32", "formattedType" : "MultiArray (Float32 1 × 9 × 360 × 640)", "shortDescription" : "", "shape" : "[1, 9, 360, 640]", "name" : "input_frames", "type" : "MultiArray" } ], "generatedClassName" : "BallTracker", "method" : "predict" } ] I have been struggling with this conversion for almost 2 weeks now so any help, ideas or pointers would be greatly appreciated! Let me know if any other information would be helpful to see as well. Thanks! Michael

import coremltools as ct from coremltools.models.neural_network import quantization_utils # load full precision model model_fp32 = ct.models.MLModel(modelPath) model_fp16 = quantization_utils.quantize_weights(model_fp32, nbits=16) model_fp16.save("reduced-model.mlmodel") I'm testing it with the model from one of Apple's source codes(GameBoardDetector), and it works fine, reduces the model size by half. But there are several problems with my model(trained on CreateML app using Full Network): Quantizing to float 16 does not work(new file gets created with reduced only 0.1mb). Quantizing to below 16 values cause errors, and no file gets created. Here are additional metadata and precisions of models. Working model's additional metadata and precision: Mine's additional metadata and precision:

基于iPhone 14 Max相机，实现模型识别，并在识别对象周围画一个矩形框。宽度和高度使用激光雷达计算，并在实时更新的图像上以厘米为单位显示。 swift code

Hello! I have a TrackNet model that I have converted to CoreML (.mlpackage) using coremltools, and the conversion process appears to go smoothly as I get the .mlpackage file I am looking for with the weights and model.mlmodel file in the folder. However, when I drag it into Xcode, it just shows up as 4 script tags instead of the model "interface" that is typically expected. I initially was concerned that my model was not compatible with CoreML, but upon logging the conversions, everything seems to be converted properly. I have some code that may be relevant in debugging this issue: How I use the model: model = BallTrackerNet() # this is the model architecture which will be referenced later device = self.device # cpu model.load_state_dict(torch.load("models/balltrackerbest.pt", map_location=device)) # balltrackerbest is the weights model = model.to(device) model.eval() Here is the BallTrackerNet() model itself import torch.nn as nn import torch class ConvBlock(nn.Module): def __init__(self, in_channels, out_channels, kernel_size=3, pad=1, stride=1, bias=True): super().__init__() self.block = nn.Sequential( nn.Conv2d(in_channels, out_channels, kernel_size, stride=stride, padding=pad, bias=bias), nn.ReLU(), nn.BatchNorm2d(out_channels) ) def forward(self, x): return self.block(x) class BallTrackerNet(nn.Module): def __init__(self, out_channels=256): super().__init__() self.out_channels = out_channels self.conv1 = ConvBlock(in_channels=9, out_channels=64) self.conv2 = ConvBlock(in_channels=64, out_channels=64) self.pool1 = nn.MaxPool2d(kernel_size=2, stride=2) self.conv3 = ConvBlock(in_channels=64, out_channels=128) self.conv4 = ConvBlock(in_channels=128, out_channels=128) self.pool2 = nn.MaxPool2d(kernel_size=2, stride=2) self.conv5 = ConvBlock(in_channels=128, out_channels=256) self.conv6 = ConvBlock(in_channels=256, out_channels=256) self.conv7 = ConvBlock(in_channels=256, out_channels=256) self.pool3 = nn.MaxPool2d(kernel_size=2, stride=2) self.conv8 = ConvBlock(in_channels=256, out_channels=512) self.conv9 = ConvBlock(in_channels=512, out_channels=512) self.conv10 = ConvBlock(in_channels=512, out_channels=512) self.ups1 = nn.Upsample(scale_factor=2) self.conv11 = ConvBlock(in_channels=512, out_channels=256) self.conv12 = ConvBlock(in_channels=256, out_channels=256) self.conv13 = ConvBlock(in_channels=256, out_channels=256) self.ups2 = nn.Upsample(scale_factor=2) self.conv14 = ConvBlock(in_channels=256, out_channels=128) self.conv15 = ConvBlock(in_channels=128, out_channels=128) self.ups3 = nn.Upsample(scale_factor=2) self.conv16 = ConvBlock(in_channels=128, out_channels=64) self.conv17 = ConvBlock(in_channels=64, out_channels=64) self.conv18 = ConvBlock(in_channels=64, out_channels=self.out_channels) self.softmax = nn.Softmax(dim=1) self._init_weights() def forward(self, x, testing=False): batch_size = x.size(0) x = self.conv1(x) x = self.conv2(x) x = self.pool1(x) x = self.conv3(x) x = self.conv4(x) x = self.pool2(x) x = self.conv5(x) x = self.conv6(x) x = self.conv7(x) x = self.pool3(x) x = self.conv8(x) x = self.conv9(x) x = self.conv10(x) x = self.ups1(x) x = self.conv11(x) x = self.conv12(x) x = self.conv13(x) x = self.ups2(x) x = self.conv14(x) x = self.conv15(x) x = self.ups3(x) x = self.conv16(x) x = self.conv17(x) x = self.conv18(x) # x = self.softmax(x) out = x.reshape(batch_size, self.out_channels, -1) if testing: out = self.softmax(out) return out def _init_weights(self): for module in self.modules(): if isinstance(module, nn.Conv2d): nn.init.uniform_(module.weight, -0.05, 0.05) if module.bias is not None: nn.init.constant_(module.bias, 0) elif isinstance(module, nn.BatchNorm2d): nn.init.constant_(module.weight, 1) nn.init.constant_(module.bias, 0) I have been struggling with this conversion for almost 2 weeks now so any help, ideas or pointers would be greatly appreciated! Thanks! Michael

When using CoreML for VAE model prediction, the prediction result shows a distorted display with no error messages. How can this issue be addressed?

After updating to macOS15.2beta, the Yolo11 object detection model exported to coreml outputs incorrect and abnormal bounding boxes. It also doesn't work in iOS apps built on a 15.2 mac. The same model worked fine on macOS14.1. When training a Yolo11 custom model in Python, exporting it to coreml, and testing it in the preview tab of mlpackage on macOS15.2 and Xcode16.0, the above result is obtained.

Hi all, I'm tuning my app prediction speed with Core ML model. I watched and tried the methods in video: Improve Core ML integration with async prediction and Optimize your Core ML usage. I also use instruments to look what's the bottleneck that my prediction speed cannot be faster. Below is the instruments result with my app. its prediction duration is 10.29ms And below is performance report shows the average speed of prediction is 5.55ms, that is about half time of my app prediction! Below is part of my instruments records. I think the prediction should be considered quite frequent. Could it be faster? How to be the same prediction speed as performance report? The prediction speed on macbook Pro M2 is nearly the same as macbook Air M1!