I am working on a lung cancer scanning app in for iOS with a CoreML model and when I test my app on a physical device, the model results in the same prediction 100% of the time. I even changed the names around and still resulted in the same case. I have listed my labels in cases and when its just stuck on the same case (case 1) My code is below: https://github.com/ShivenKhurana1/Detect-to-Protect-App/blob/main/DetectToProtect/SecondView.swift I couldn't add the code as it was too long so I hope github link is fine!

Hello, I'm trying to write a model with PyTorch and convert it to CoreML. I wrote another models and that works succesfully, even the one that gave the problem is, but I can't visualize it with XCode to know where is running. The error that appear is: There was a problem decoding this Core ML document validator error: unable to open file for read Anyone knows why is this happening? Thanks a lot, Álvaro Corrochano

Our app is downloading a zip of an .mlpackage file, which is then compiled into an .mlmodelc file using MLModel.compileModel(at:). This model is then run using a VNCoreMLRequest. Two users – and this after a very small rollout - are reporting issues running the VNCoreMLRequest. The error message from their logs: Error Domain=com.apple.CoreML Code=0 "Failed to build the model execution plan using a model architecture file '/private/var/mobile/Containers/Data/Application/F93077A5-5508-4970-92A6-03A835E3291D/Documents/SKDownload/Identify-image-iOS/mobile_img_eu_v210.mlmodelc/model.mil' with error code: -5." The URL there is to a file inside the compiled model. The error is happening when the perform function of VNImageRequestHandler is run. (i.e. the model compiled without an error.) Anyone else seen this issue? Its only picked up in a few web results and none of them are directly relevant or have a fix. I know that a CoreML error Code=0 is a generic error, but does anyone know what error code -5 is? Not even sure which framework its coming from.

I've been trying to get some basic models to work on an M2 with tensor metal 1.2 and keras 2.15 and 2.18 and they all fail to work as expected. I'm running models copy/pasted from common tutorials like Jason Brownlee ML Mastery Object Classification tutorial using CIFAR-10. When run with the GPU I can't get any reasonable results. Under keras 2.15 the best validation accuracy ends up being around 10-15%. Under keras 2.18, the validation goes off the rails around epoch 5 with wildly low accuracy and loss values that are reported as "nan". Epoch 4/25 782/782: 19s 24ms/step - accuracy: 0.3450 - loss: 2.8925 - val_accuracy: 0.2992 - val_loss: 1.9869 Epoch 5/25 782/782: 19s 24ms/step - accuracy: 0.2553 - loss: nan - val_accuracy: 0.0000e+00 - val_loss: nan Running the same code on the CPU using keras 2.15 using tf.config.experimental.set_visible_devices([], 'GPU') yields a reasonable result with the validation accuracy around 75% as expected. Running the same code on keras 2.15 on a linux instance with just the CPU provides similar results. The tutorial can be found here: https://machinelearningmastery.com/object-recognition-convolutional-neural-networks-keras-deep-learning-library/ The only places I've deviated from the provided tutorial is using sdg = tf.keras.optimizers.legacy.SGD(learning_rate=lrate, momentum=0.9, nesterov=False) I did this at the advice of the warning: WARNING:absl:At this time, the v2.11+ optimizer `tf.keras.optimizers.SGD` runs slowly on M1/M2 Macs, please use the legacy Keras optimizer instead, located at `tf.keras.optimizers.legacy.SGD`. Is there something special that I need to do to make this work? I've followed the instructions here: https://developer.apple.com/metal/tensorflow-plugin/ I've purged the venv a few times and started from scratch, but all with similarly terrible results. Here are my platform details: Chip: Apple M2 Memory: 16 GB macOS : Sequoia 15.2 Python venv: 3.11 Jupyter Lab Version: 4.3.3 TensorFlow versions: 2.15, 2.18 tensorflow-metal: 1.2.0 Thanks for any assistance or advice.

I was generating models using the code:- import Foundation import CreateML import TabularData import CoreML .... func makeTheModel(columntopredict:String,training:DataFrame,colstouse:[String],numberofmodels:Int) -> [MLLinearRegressor] { var returnmodels = [MLLinearRegressor]() var result = 0.0 for i in 0...numberofmodels { let pms = MLLinearRegressor.ModelParameters(validation: .split(strategy: .automatic)) do { let tm = try MLLinearRegressor(trainingData: training, targetColumn: columntopredict) returnmodels.append(tm) } catch let error as NSError { print("Error: \(error.localizedDescription)") } } return returnmodels } Which worked absolutely fine with Sonoma, but upon upgrading the OS to 15.3.1, it does absolutely nothing. I get no error messages, I get nothing, the code just pauses. If I look at CPU usage, as soon as it hits the line let tm = try MLLinearRegressor(trainingData: training, targetColumn: columntopredict) the CPU usage drops to 0% What am I doing wrong? Is there a flag I need to set somewhere in Xcode? This is on an M1 MacBook Pro Any help would be greatly appreciated

Based on the documentation, it appears that MLTensor can be used to perform tensor operations using the ANE (Apple Neural Engine) by wrapping the tensor operations with withMLTensorComputePolicy with a MLComputePolicy initialized with MLComputeUnits.cpuAndNeuralEngine (it can also be initialized with MLComputeUnits.all to let the OS spread the load between the Neural Engine, GPU and CPU). However, when using the Instruments app, it appears that the tensor operations never get executed on the Neural Engine. It would be helpful if someone can guide me on the correct way to ensure that the Nerual Engine is used to perform the tensor operations (not as part of a CoreML model file). based on this example, I've created a simple code to try it: import Foundation import CoreML print("Starting...") let semaphore = DispatchSemaphore(value: 0) Task { await withMLTensorComputePolicy(.init(MLComputeUnits.cpuAndNeuralEngine)) { let v1 = MLTensor([1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0]) let v2 = MLTensor([5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0]) let v3 = v1.matmul(v2) await v3.shapedArray(of: Float.self) // is 70.0 let m1 = MLTensor(shape: [2, 3], scalars: [ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ], scalarType: Float.self) let m2 = MLTensor(shape: [3, 2], scalars: [ 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ], scalarType: Float.self) let m3 = m1.matmul(m2) let result = await m3.shapedArray(of: Float.self) // is [[58, 64], [139, 154]] // Supports broadcasting let m4 = MLTensor(randomNormal: [3, 1, 1, 4], scalarType: Float.self) let m5 = MLTensor(randomNormal: [4, 2], scalarType: Float.self) let m6 = m4.matmul(m5) print("Done") return result; } semaphore.signal() } semaphore.wait() Here's what I get on the Instruments app: Notice how the Neural Engine line shows no usage. Ive run this test on an M1 Max MacBook Pro.

Hey guys, I've been having difficulties transferring my Xcode project to a Swift playground (.swiftpm) for the Swift Student Challenge. I keep getting these errors as well as none of the views being able to find the model in scope: "TrashDetector 1.mlmodel: No predominant language detected. Set COREML_CODEGEN_LANGUAGE to preferred language." Unexpected duplicate tasks: Target 'TrashQuest' (project 'TrashQuest') has write command with output /Users/kmcph3/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/TrashQuest-glvzskunedgtakfrdmsxdoplondj/Build/Intermediates.noindex/TrashQuest.build/Debug-iphonesimulator/TrashQuest.build/0a4ef2429d66360920ddb4f16e65e233.sb I've gone through multiple post with these exact problems, but they all seem to be talking about ".playground" files due to the "Resources" folder (mind you I did try exactly what they said). Is there anyone that can help??? (Quick side note, why does it need to be a swiftpm file for the SSC??? Like why can't we just send the zip of our Xcode project??)

Hello, I have a CoreML model and I want to convert it to a PyTorch model. Any ideas if this is possible and if so how?

I have exported a Pytorch model into a CoreML mlpackage file and imported the model file into my iOS project. The model is a Music Source Separation model - running prediction on audio-spectrogram blocks and returning separated audio source spectrograms. Model produces correct results vs. desktop+GPU+Python but the inference on iPhone 15 Pro Max is really, really slow. Using Xcode model Performance tool I can see that the inference isn't automatically managed between compute units - all of it runs on CPU. The Performance tool notation hints all that ops should be supported by both the GPU and Neural Engine. One thing to note, that when initializing the model with MLModelConfiguration option .cpuAndGPU or .cpuAndNeuralEngine there is an error in Xcode console: `Error(s) occurred compiling MIL to BNNS graph: [CreateBnnsGraphProgramFromMIL]: Failed to determine convolution kernel at location at /private/var/containers/Bundle/Application/2E3C4AFF-1FA4-4C95-AAE4-ECEBC0FB0BF9/mymss.app/mymss.mlmodelc/model.mil:2453:12 @ CreateBnnsGraphProgramFromMIL` Before going back hammering the model in Python, are there any tips/strategies I could try in CoreMLTools export phase or in configuring the model for prediction on iOS? My export toolchain is currently Linux with CoreMLTools v8.1, export target iOS16.

Dear Apple Developer Team, I am writing to request the addition of GS1 DataBar Stacked (both regular and expanded variants) to the barcode symbologies supported by the Vision framework (VNBarcodeSymbology) and VisionKit's DataScannerViewController. Currently, Vision supports several GS1 DataBar formats, such as: VNBarcodeSymbology.gs1DataBar VNBarcodeSymbology.gs1DataBarExpanded VNBarcodeSymbology.gs1DataBarLimited However, GS1 DataBar Stacked is widely used in industries such as retail, pharmaceuticals, and logistics, where space constraints prevent the use of the standard GS1 DataBar format. Many businesses rely on this symbology to encode GTINs and other product data, but Apple's barcode scanning API does not explicitly support it. Why This Feature Matters: Essential for Small Packaging: GS1 DataBar Stacked is commonly used on small product labels where a standard linear barcode does not fit. Widespread Industry Adoption: Many point-of-sale (POS) systems and inventory management tools require this symbology. Improves iOS Adoption for Enterprise Use: Adding support would make Apple’s Vision framework a more viable solution for businesses that currently rely on third-party barcode scanning SDKs. Feature Request: Please add GS1 DataBar Stacked and GS1 DataBar Expanded Stacked to the recognized symbologies in: VNBarcodeSymbology (for Vision framework) DataScannerViewController (for VisionKit) This addition would enhance the versatility of Apple’s barcode scanning tools and reduce the need for third-party libraries. I appreciate your consideration of this request and would be happy to provide more details or test implementations if needed. Thank you for your time and support! Best regards

Hello, I am currently developing an application that requires barcode scanning using Apple’s Vision framework (VNBarcodeSymbology). I noticed that the framework supports several GS1 DataBar symbologies, such as: VNBarcodeSymbology.gs1DataBar VNBarcodeSymbology.gs1DataBarExpanded VNBarcodeSymbology.gs1DataBarLimited However, I could not find any explicit reference to support for GS1 DataBar Stacked (both regular and expanded variants). Could you confirm whether GS1 DataBar Stacked is currently supported in VisionKit's DataScannerViewController or VNBarcodeObservation? If not, are there any plans to include support for this symbology in a future iOS update? This functionality is critical for my use case, as GS1 DataBar Stacked barcodes are widely used in retail, pharmaceuticals, and logistics, where space constraints prevent the use of standard GS1 DataBar formats. I appreciate any clarification on this matter and would be happy to provide additional details if needed.

I'm working on my Swift Student Challenge submission and developing a Vision framework-based image classifier. I want to ensure I'm following best practices for training data and follow to guidelines for what images I use to train my image classifier. What types of images can I use for training my model? Are there specific image databases or resources recommended by Apple that are safe to use for Swift Student Challenge submissions? Currently considering images used from wikipedia, and my own images

Good evening, I am encountering an issue when trying to use this method: modelAssetWithSpecificationData:blobMapping:error: I provide the specification data and a blobMapping. In the generated spec I can see the weights are referenced with this way: @model_path/weights/weight.bin In model.mlmodel. I populate my blob mapping with the content of weights.bin with a URL that matches the above string. However, I don't believe the blobMapping is ever being accessed because I get the following error: Error: compiler error: Encountered an error while compiling a neural network model: in operation const_0_to_fp16: Cannot interpret @model_path when ModelPath is unset I can confirm that the operation is the first use of weights in the model.mlmodel I have not yet found a way to set ModelPath or to change that string. Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.

I am trying to run TinyLlama directly using Swift Playgrounds for iOS. I have tried multiple solutions, like libraries (LLM.swift, swift-transformers, ...) which never worked due to import issues, and also tried importing an exported mlmodel. For the later, I followed the article about Llama 3.1 on CoreML. It was hard to understand how to do the inference with it, but I was able to export a mlpackage, that I then placed in a xcode project to generate the mlmodelc (compiled model) and the model class. I had to go with the first version described in the article, without optimizations, as I got errors during model loading with the flexible input shapes. I was able to run the model for one token generation. But my biggest problem is that, though the mlmodelc is only 550 MiB, th model loads 24+GiB of memory, largely exceeding what I can have on an iOS device. Is there a way to use do LLM inferences on Swift Playgrounds at a reasonable speed (even 1 token / s would be sufficient)?

Hello! I have a swift program that tracks the location of a ball (through the back camera). It seems to be working fine, but the only issue is the run time, particularly my concatenate, normalize, and argmax functions, which are meant to be a 1 to 1 copy of the PyTorch argmax function and the following python lines: imgs = np.concatenate((img, img_prev, img_preprev), axis=2) imgs = imgs.astype(np.float32)/255.0 imgs = np.rollaxis(imgs, 2, 0) inp = np.expand_dims(imgs, axis=0) # used to pass into model However, I need my program to run in real time and in an ideal world, I want it to run way under real time. Below is a run down of the run times that result from my code: Starting model inference Setup took: 0.0 seconds Resize took: 0.03741896152496338 seconds Concatenation took: 0.3359949588775635 seconds Normalization took: 0.9906361103057861 seconds Model prediction took: 0.3425499200820923 seconds Argmax took: 28.17007803916931 seconds Postprocess took: 0.054128050804138184 seconds Model inference took 29.934185028076172 seconds Here are the concatenateBuffers, normalizeBuffers, and argmax functions that I use: func concatenateBuffers(_ buffers: [CVPixelBuffer?]) -> CVPixelBuffer? { guard buffers.count == 3, let first = buffers[0] else { return nil } let width = CVPixelBufferGetWidth(first) let height = CVPixelBufferGetHeight(first) let targetChannels = 9 var concatenated: CVPixelBuffer? let attrs = [kCVPixelBufferCGImageCompatibilityKey: kCFBooleanTrue] as CFDictionary CVPixelBufferCreate(kCFAllocatorDefault, width, height, kCVPixelFormatType_32BGRA, attrs, &concatenated) guard let output = concatenated else { return nil } CVPixelBufferLockBaseAddress(output, []) defer { CVPixelBufferUnlockBaseAddress(output, []) } guard let outputData = CVPixelBufferGetBaseAddress(output) else { return nil } let outputPtr = UnsafeMutablePointer<UInt8>(OpaquePointer(outputData)) // Lock all input buffers at once buffers.forEach { buffer in guard let buffer = buffer else { return } CVPixelBufferLockBaseAddress(buffer, .readOnly) } defer { buffers.forEach { CVPixelBufferUnlockBaseAddress($0!, .readOnly) } } // Process each input buffer for (frameIdx, buffer) in buffers.enumerated() { guard let buffer = buffer, let inputData = CVPixelBufferGetBaseAddress(buffer) else { continue } let inputPtr = UnsafePointer<UInt8>(OpaquePointer(inputData)) let bytesPerRow = CVPixelBufferGetBytesPerRow(buffer) let totalPixels = width * height // Process all pixels in one go for this frame for i in 0..<totalPixels { let y = i / width let x = i % width let inputOffset = y * bytesPerRow + x * 4 let outputOffset = i * targetChannels + frameIdx * 3 // BGR order to match numpy outputPtr[outputOffset] = inputPtr[inputOffset + 2] // B outputPtr[outputOffset + 1] = inputPtr[inputOffset + 1] // G outputPtr[outputOffset + 2] = inputPtr[inputOffset] // R } } return output } func normalizeBuffer(_ buffer: CVPixelBuffer?) -> MLMultiArray? { guard let input = buffer else { return nil } let width = CVPixelBufferGetWidth(input) let height = CVPixelBufferGetHeight(input) let channels = 9 CVPixelBufferLockBaseAddress(input, .readOnly) defer { CVPixelBufferUnlockBaseAddress(input, .readOnly) } guard let inputData = CVPixelBufferGetBaseAddress(input) else { return nil } let shape = [1, NSNumber(value: channels), NSNumber(value: height), NSNumber(value: width)] guard let output = try? MLMultiArray(shape: shape, dataType: .float32) else { return nil } let inputPtr = inputData.assumingMemoryBound(to: UInt8.self) let bytesPerRow = CVPixelBufferGetBytesPerRow(input) let ptr = UnsafeMutablePointer<Float>(OpaquePointer(output.dataPointer)) let totalSize = width * height for c in 0..<channels { for idx in 0..<totalSize { let h = idx / width let w = idx % width let inputIdx = h * bytesPerRow + w * channels + c ptr[c * totalSize + idx] = Float(inputPtr[inputIdx]) / 255.0 } } return output } func argmax(_ array: MLMultiArray) -> MLMultiArray? { let shape = array.shape.map { $0.intValue } guard shape.count == 3, shape[0] == 1, shape[1] == 256, shape[2] == 230400 else { return nil } guard let output = try? MLMultiArray(shape: [1, NSNumber(value: 230400)], dataType: .int32) else { return nil } let ptr = UnsafePointer<Float>(OpaquePointer(array.dataPointer)) let outputPtr = UnsafeMutablePointer<Int32>(OpaquePointer(output.dataPointer)) let channelSize = 230400 for pos in 0..<230400 { var maxValue = -Float.infinity var maxIndex: Int32 = 0 for channel in 0..<256 { let value = ptr[channel * channelSize + pos] if value > maxValue { maxValue = value maxIndex = Int32(channel) } } outputPtr[pos] = maxIndex } return output } Are there any glaring areas of inefficiencies that can be reduced to allow for under real time processing whilst following the same logic as found in the python code exactly? Would using Obj-C speed things up for some reason? Are there any tools I can use so I don't have to write these functions myself? Additionally, in the classes init, function, I tried to check the compute units being used since I feel 0.34 seconds for a singular model prediction is also far too long, but no print statements are showing for some reason: init() { guard let loadedModel = try? BallTrackerModel() else { fatalError("Could not load model") } let config = MLModelConfiguration() config.computeUnits = .all guard let configuredModel = try? BallTrackerModel(configuration: config) else { fatalError("Could not configure model") } self.model = configuredModel print("model loaded with compute units \(config.computeUnits.rawValue)") } Thanks!

Hey everyone, I want to add an if statement that would do something along the lines of this: if confidence = 100% { } How could I do this? I already have a createML model. Thank you, Oliver

Hello! I have a TrackNet model that I have converted to CoreML (.mlpackage) using coremltools, and the conversion process appears to go smoothly as I get the .mlpackage file I am looking for with the weights and model.mlmodel file in the folder. However, when I drag it into Xcode, it just shows up as 4 script tags (as pictured) instead of the model "interface" that is typically expected. I initially was concerned that my model was not compatible with CoreML, but upon logging the conversions, everything seems to be converted properly. I have some code that may be relevant in debugging this issue: How I use the model: model = BallTrackerNet() # this is the model architecture which will be referenced later device = self.device # cpu model.load_state_dict(torch.load("models/balltrackerbest.pt", map_location=device)) # balltrackerbest is the weights model = model.to(device) model.eval() Here is the BallTrackerNet() model itself: import torch.nn as nn import torch class ConvBlock(nn.Module): def __init__(self, in_channels, out_channels, kernel_size=3, pad=1, stride=1, bias=True): super().__init__() self.block = nn.Sequential( nn.Conv2d(in_channels, out_channels, kernel_size, stride=stride, padding=pad, bias=bias), nn.ReLU(), nn.BatchNorm2d(out_channels) ) def forward(self, x): return self.block(x) class BallTrackerNet(nn.Module): def __init__(self, out_channels=256): super().__init__() self.out_channels = out_channels self.conv1 = ConvBlock(in_channels=9, out_channels=64) self.conv2 = ConvBlock(in_channels=64, out_channels=64) self.pool1 = nn.MaxPool2d(kernel_size=2, stride=2) self.conv3 = ConvBlock(in_channels=64, out_channels=128) self.conv4 = ConvBlock(in_channels=128, out_channels=128) self.pool2 = nn.MaxPool2d(kernel_size=2, stride=2) self.conv5 = ConvBlock(in_channels=128, out_channels=256) self.conv6 = ConvBlock(in_channels=256, out_channels=256) self.conv7 = ConvBlock(in_channels=256, out_channels=256) self.pool3 = nn.MaxPool2d(kernel_size=2, stride=2) self.conv8 = ConvBlock(in_channels=256, out_channels=512) self.conv9 = ConvBlock(in_channels=512, out_channels=512) self.conv10 = ConvBlock(in_channels=512, out_channels=512) self.ups1 = nn.Upsample(scale_factor=2) self.conv11 = ConvBlock(in_channels=512, out_channels=256) self.conv12 = ConvBlock(in_channels=256, out_channels=256) self.conv13 = ConvBlock(in_channels=256, out_channels=256) self.ups2 = nn.Upsample(scale_factor=2) self.conv14 = ConvBlock(in_channels=256, out_channels=128) self.conv15 = ConvBlock(in_channels=128, out_channels=128) self.ups3 = nn.Upsample(scale_factor=2) self.conv16 = ConvBlock(in_channels=128, out_channels=64) self.conv17 = ConvBlock(in_channels=64, out_channels=64) self.conv18 = ConvBlock(in_channels=64, out_channels=self.out_channels) self.softmax = nn.Softmax(dim=1) self._init_weights() def forward(self, x, testing=False): batch_size = x.size(0) x = self.conv1(x) x = self.conv2(x) x = self.pool1(x) x = self.conv3(x) x = self.conv4(x) x = self.pool2(x) x = self.conv5(x) x = self.conv6(x) x = self.conv7(x) x = self.pool3(x) x = self.conv8(x) x = self.conv9(x) x = self.conv10(x) x = self.ups1(x) x = self.conv11(x) x = self.conv12(x) x = self.conv13(x) x = self.ups2(x) x = self.conv14(x) x = self.conv15(x) x = self.ups3(x) x = self.conv16(x) x = self.conv17(x) x = self.conv18(x) # x = self.softmax(x) out = x.reshape(batch_size, self.out_channels, -1) if testing: out = self.softmax(out) return out def _init_weights(self): for module in self.modules(): if isinstance(module, nn.Conv2d): nn.init.uniform_(module.weight, -0.05, 0.05) if module.bias is not None: nn.init.constant_(module.bias, 0) elif isinstance(module, nn.BatchNorm2d): nn.init.constant_(module.weight, 1) nn.init.constant_(module.bias, 0) Here is also the meta data of my model: [ { "metadataOutputVersion" : "3.0", "storagePrecision" : "Float16", "outputSchema" : [ { "hasShapeFlexibility" : "0", "isOptional" : "0", "dataType" : "Float32", "formattedType" : "MultiArray (Float32 1 × 256 × 230400)", "shortDescription" : "", "shape" : "[1, 256, 230400]", "name" : "var_462", "type" : "MultiArray" } ], "modelParameters" : [ ], "specificationVersion" : 6, "mlProgramOperationTypeHistogram" : { "Cast" : 2, "Conv" : 18, "Relu" : 18, "BatchNorm" : 18, "Reshape" : 1, "UpsampleNearestNeighbor" : 3, "MaxPool" : 3 }, "computePrecision" : "Mixed (Float16, Float32, Int32)", "isUpdatable" : "0", "availability" : { "macOS" : "12.0", "tvOS" : "15.0", "visionOS" : "1.0", "watchOS" : "8.0", "iOS" : "15.0", "macCatalyst" : "15.0" }, "modelType" : { "name" : "MLModelType_mlProgram" }, "userDefinedMetadata" : { "com.github.apple.coremltools.source_dialect" : "TorchScript", "com.github.apple.coremltools.source" : "torch==2.5.1", "com.github.apple.coremltools.version" : "8.1" }, "inputSchema" : [ { "hasShapeFlexibility" : "0", "isOptional" : "0", "dataType" : "Float32", "formattedType" : "MultiArray (Float32 1 × 9 × 360 × 640)", "shortDescription" : "", "shape" : "[1, 9, 360, 640]", "name" : "input_frames", "type" : "MultiArray" } ], "generatedClassName" : "BallTracker", "method" : "predict" } ] I have been struggling with this conversion for almost 2 weeks now so any help, ideas or pointers would be greatly appreciated! Let me know if any other information would be helpful to see as well. Thanks! Michael

import coremltools as ct from coremltools.models.neural_network import quantization_utils # load full precision model model_fp32 = ct.models.MLModel(modelPath) model_fp16 = quantization_utils.quantize_weights(model_fp32, nbits=16) model_fp16.save("reduced-model.mlmodel") I'm testing it with the model from one of Apple's source codes(GameBoardDetector), and it works fine, reduces the model size by half. But there are several problems with my model(trained on CreateML app using Full Network): Quantizing to float 16 does not work(new file gets created with reduced only 0.1mb). Quantizing to below 16 values cause errors, and no file gets created. Here are additional metadata and precisions of models. Working model's additional metadata and precision: Mine's additional metadata and precision:

基于iPhone 14 Max相机，实现模型识别，并在识别对象周围画一个矩形框。宽度和高度使用激光雷达计算，并在实时更新的图像上以厘米为单位显示。 swift code

Hello! I have a TrackNet model that I have converted to CoreML (.mlpackage) using coremltools, and the conversion process appears to go smoothly as I get the .mlpackage file I am looking for with the weights and model.mlmodel file in the folder. However, when I drag it into Xcode, it just shows up as 4 script tags instead of the model "interface" that is typically expected. I initially was concerned that my model was not compatible with CoreML, but upon logging the conversions, everything seems to be converted properly. I have some code that may be relevant in debugging this issue: How I use the model: model = BallTrackerNet() # this is the model architecture which will be referenced later device = self.device # cpu model.load_state_dict(torch.load("models/balltrackerbest.pt", map_location=device)) # balltrackerbest is the weights model = model.to(device) model.eval() Here is the BallTrackerNet() model itself import torch.nn as nn import torch class ConvBlock(nn.Module): def __init__(self, in_channels, out_channels, kernel_size=3, pad=1, stride=1, bias=True): super().__init__() self.block = nn.Sequential( nn.Conv2d(in_channels, out_channels, kernel_size, stride=stride, padding=pad, bias=bias), nn.ReLU(), nn.BatchNorm2d(out_channels) ) def forward(self, x): return self.block(x) class BallTrackerNet(nn.Module): def __init__(self, out_channels=256): super().__init__() self.out_channels = out_channels self.conv1 = ConvBlock(in_channels=9, out_channels=64) self.conv2 = ConvBlock(in_channels=64, out_channels=64) self.pool1 = nn.MaxPool2d(kernel_size=2, stride=2) self.conv3 = ConvBlock(in_channels=64, out_channels=128) self.conv4 = ConvBlock(in_channels=128, out_channels=128) self.pool2 = nn.MaxPool2d(kernel_size=2, stride=2) self.conv5 = ConvBlock(in_channels=128, out_channels=256) self.conv6 = ConvBlock(in_channels=256, out_channels=256) self.conv7 = ConvBlock(in_channels=256, out_channels=256) self.pool3 = nn.MaxPool2d(kernel_size=2, stride=2) self.conv8 = ConvBlock(in_channels=256, out_channels=512) self.conv9 = ConvBlock(in_channels=512, out_channels=512) self.conv10 = ConvBlock(in_channels=512, out_channels=512) self.ups1 = nn.Upsample(scale_factor=2) self.conv11 = ConvBlock(in_channels=512, out_channels=256) self.conv12 = ConvBlock(in_channels=256, out_channels=256) self.conv13 = ConvBlock(in_channels=256, out_channels=256) self.ups2 = nn.Upsample(scale_factor=2) self.conv14 = ConvBlock(in_channels=256, out_channels=128) self.conv15 = ConvBlock(in_channels=128, out_channels=128) self.ups3 = nn.Upsample(scale_factor=2) self.conv16 = ConvBlock(in_channels=128, out_channels=64) self.conv17 = ConvBlock(in_channels=64, out_channels=64) self.conv18 = ConvBlock(in_channels=64, out_channels=self.out_channels) self.softmax = nn.Softmax(dim=1) self._init_weights() def forward(self, x, testing=False): batch_size = x.size(0) x = self.conv1(x) x = self.conv2(x) x = self.pool1(x) x = self.conv3(x) x = self.conv4(x) x = self.pool2(x) x = self.conv5(x) x = self.conv6(x) x = self.conv7(x) x = self.pool3(x) x = self.conv8(x) x = self.conv9(x) x = self.conv10(x) x = self.ups1(x) x = self.conv11(x) x = self.conv12(x) x = self.conv13(x) x = self.ups2(x) x = self.conv14(x) x = self.conv15(x) x = self.ups3(x) x = self.conv16(x) x = self.conv17(x) x = self.conv18(x) # x = self.softmax(x) out = x.reshape(batch_size, self.out_channels, -1) if testing: out = self.softmax(out) return out def _init_weights(self): for module in self.modules(): if isinstance(module, nn.Conv2d): nn.init.uniform_(module.weight, -0.05, 0.05) if module.bias is not None: nn.init.constant_(module.bias, 0) elif isinstance(module, nn.BatchNorm2d): nn.init.constant_(module.weight, 1) nn.init.constant_(module.bias, 0) I have been struggling with this conversion for almost 2 weeks now so any help, ideas or pointers would be greatly appreciated! Thanks! Michael