It appears that we are able to read the currently logged-in Platform SSO user by reading the AltSecurityIdentities field in the dscl repository for the user. However, that seems to be something that could easily be spoofed by just having an external process write a new AltSecurityIdentities value. It also feels "hacky" to just read that value directly from the dscl repository for this purpose. Our application would like to read the user that is logged in to Platform SSO so we can report it up to our security service as the "device logged in user". Is there an API-based approach to retrieving the true user that is logged in via Platform SSO from within the context of my application?

Issue Summary We are seeing consistently high latency when calling DCAppAttestService.shared.attestKey(_:clientDataHash:). The call routinely takes 4–5 seconds in the development environment and 7–8 seconds in production. In contrast, other DeviceCheck operations execute very quickly on the same setup (e.g., DCDevice.generateToken takes ~100ms, and generateAssertion takes ~80ms). Environment Details Platform: iOS (reproduced on physical devices) Framework: DeviceCheck / App Attest Entitlements: com.apple.developer.devicecheck.appattest-environment set appropriately for each environment (development / production) Execution Flow: generateKey (or keychain lookup) $\rightarrow$ attestKey $\rightarrow$ generateAssertion Representative Timings (Development / Physical Device) ensureKey (keychain reuse): 5 ms generateDeviceToken: 91 ms attestKey (Apple API execution): 5,196 ms generateAssertion: 76 ms Total Wall Time: ~5,505 ms Steps to Reproduce On a physical iPhone, invoke DCAppAttestService.shared.generateKey() (or retrieve an existing keyId). Generate a client challenge hash (SHA256). Invoke attestKey(_:clientDataHash:completionHandler:) with the keyId and hash. Observe the multi-second delay before the completion handler returns the attestation statement. Questions & Guidance Requested Expected Baseline: Is 4–8 seconds for a successful attestKey call considered expected behavior for Apple’s attestation servers, or does this indicate an anomaly? Environment & Regional Latency: Are there known factors (e.g., server geographic routing, network handshakes, or environment differences) that cause attestKey to be noticeably slower in production compared to development? Mitigation / Best Practices: Since attestation is recommended once per key/device lifecycle upon key generation, are there specific architectural patterns Apple recommends to avoid blocking UI or onboarding flows during this high-latency step? Note: We can supply full sysdiagnose logs, device model/iOS version breakdowns, and code snippets if required.

Hello! I develop a voicemail app service and I use MMI codes to let users enable/disable call forwarding to their voicemail number. For example, the app opens the Phone app with a code such as: **21*<phone number># This is expected behavior and is required for the service to work. However on iOS 27, those links are now blocked with a “Malicious link blocked” warning, saying that the link may forward incoming calls/messages. Is there any supported way for apps with a legitimate use case like this to request an exemption, or otherwise avoid this warning?

Hi everyone! We recently integrated "Sign in with Apple" into our application using standard social login flows. For the vast majority of our users, the integration works perfectly—we receive the user's email during sign-in and sign-up. However, we are noticing an edge case where a small subset of users are returning an ID token that is completely missing the email. We can't seem to reproduce this error ourselves during testing. Every time we test a sign-up or sign-in, the email payload is included exactly as expected. My Questions: Is there a specific reason why Apple would omit the email claim from the ID token? Any insights or guidance would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!

Hi, Feedback ID - FB24176019 I am investigating a Sign in with Apple issue affecting my production application and would appreciate guidance on what Apple may be rejecting during the token exchange. The authorization stage succeeds and Apple returns an authorization code to our callback. The failure occurs when the authorization code is exchanged at: https://appleid.apple.com/auth/token The production OAuth implementation uses Better Auth 1.6.13. Apple configuration: Primary App ID / Bundle ID: com.whatsupplier.uk Services ID / client_id: com.whatsupplier.uk.signin Registered return URL: https://www.whatsupp.uk/api/auth/callback/apple We have checked the client secret JWT and confirmed: alg = ES256 kid matches the active Apple key iss matches our Apple Team ID sub = com.whatsupplier.uk.signin aud = https://appleid.apple.com iat/exp are valid the JWT signature verifies locally against the configured Apple private key the signature is P1363/raw r||s rather than ASN.1 DER the private key is EC / prime256v1 the redirect_uri exactly matches the registered return URL the token request uses application/x-www-form-urlencoded The unusual behaviour is reproducible: The real Better Auth token exchange reaches Apple's /auth/token endpoint but Apple responds: HTTP 400 error: invalid_client We created a diagnostic request directly to the same Apple token endpoint using the same configured credentials and a deliberately invalid authorization code. Apple responds: HTTP 400 error: invalid_grant "The code has expired or has been revoked." This indicates Apple accepts the client credentials/JWT in the direct request and proceeds as far as validating the authorization code. We also performed an A/B test using the exact same generated client-secret JWT: Test A: grant_type code redirect_uri client_id client_secret Result: invalid_grant Test B: grant_type code redirect_uri client_id client_secret code_verifier Result: invalid_grant Therefore code_verifier alone does not change Apple's classification. We then captured the observable shape of the real Better Auth token request and compared it with a direct request. The client_id, redirect_uri, grant_type, client-secret JWT claims, URLSearchParams/form encoding and absence of an Authorization header were consistent. Despite this, the real framework-generated exchange returns invalid_client while the direct diagnostic request is accepted at the client-authentication stage and returns invalid_grant. Could Apple advise what additional property of the token request could cause this difference in classification? In particular, is there any server-side state or request characteristic used by Sign in with Apple that could cause an otherwise valid client_secret to be classified as invalid_client only during the real authorization-code exchange? I have also prepared detailed diagnostic evidence and can submit the requested sensitive request information through Feedback Assistant rather than posting JWTs, authorization codes, or other credentials publicly. Thank you.

Case #20000132024383 has been filed with Developer Support; posting here as well for visibility Hi Apple Developer Support team, We are experiencing a release-blocking issue: Sign in with Apple always fails server-side with AKAuthenticationServerError -24000 for our bundle com.dadilo.app, on all devices and all Apple IDs we have tested, while the same devices and accounts use Sign in with Apple successfully in other apps. IDENTIFIERS Team ID: HF53KC83Z3 (Individual - Nguyen Duy Mao) Bundle ID: com.dadilo.app (App ID resource 96Q4FAZ8PF) App Store Connect app: "Dadilo: Giup viec nha" - Apple ID 6782634291 (unreleased; TestFlight builds 1.0.0 (120-126)) Client: native ASAuthorizationAppleIDProvider request (Flutter sign_in_with_apple plugin). No web/Services-ID flow is involved. SYMPTOM Every Sign in with Apple attempt completes the system sheet (Face ID/password succeeds, scope selection is shown), then iOS shows the alert "Sign-Up Not Completed". The app's ASAuthorizationControllerDelegate receives ASAuthorizationError code 1001. No credential is ever issued. Device syslog at the exact moment of each failure (captured 2026-08-07 and 2026-08-08): akd: SRP authentication with server failed! Error Domain=com.apple.AppleIDAuthSupport Code=2 AKRemoteViewController did complete with authorization (null), error Domain=com.apple.AppleIDAuthSupport Code=2, NSUnderlyingError Domain=AKAuthenticationServerError Code=-24000 akd: Creating AKAuthenticationServerResponse with status contents: (null) akd: Invalid/missing value for key acname: (null); Invalid value for key ut: (null); Invalid value for key authType: (null) The server rejects the request and returns an EMPTY payload; -24000 is the client's reaction to it. An initial tap sometimes logs AKAuthenticationError -7003 first. REPRODUCTION - fails in EVERY combination Devices: iPad mini (iPad16,2, iPadOS 26.5.2) and an iPhone (iOS 26.x) - fails on both Apple IDs: 2 different accounts (2FA enabled, adult, region Vietnam) - fails on both Builds: TestFlight 1.0.0 builds 122, 124, 125, 126 - fails on all Request shape: the standard request (email + fullName scopes, SHA-256 nonce) AND a minimal request (no scopes, no nonce) both fail identically DECISIVE CONTROL TEST (2026-08-08) On the SAME iPad, SAME Apple ID, SAME network, minutes after our app failed,le authorization for another app (ChatGPT - never previously authorized on this account) succeeded normally. So fresh-authorization SRP works for this erver issues credentials for other bundles but rejects com.dadilo.app specifically. Existing authorizations (Notion, Grab, Shopee, Goodnotes) alsocounts. ALREADY VERIFIED / RULED OUT Entitlement com.apple.developer.applesignin = [Default] present in the binary; the provisioning profile contains the entitlement (decoded and checked); the authorization sheet opens and biometric completes, so the entitlement is honored App ID capability APPLE_ID_AUTH enabled, APPLE_ID_AUTH_APP_CONSENT = PRIMARY_APP_CONSENT (verified via App Store Connect API); no grouped-app configuration conflicts on the team Program License Agreement issued 2026-06-18, accepted 2026-06-21; no pendi Test Apple IDs are healthy: 2FA on, adult birthdays, no Family restrictionh Apple with other apps No stale authorizations: this app is not listed in Settings > Sign in with- Capability re-provisioning attempted 2026-08-08: deleted and re-created APnerated a brand-new App Store provisioning profile, rebuilt and re-tested(build 125) - identical -24000 failure Apple System Status showed no Sign in with Apple outage during any test REQUEST AKAuthenticationServerError -24000 is not publicly documented. Everything clecks out, and the failure is 100% reproducible for this bundle ID only.Please inspect the server-side Sign in with Apple configuration/state for co3 and advise what is rejecting credential issuance.The app is complete and ready for App Store submission; Sign in with Apple ier Guideline 4.8, so this issue is blocking our first release. Fullidevicesyslog captures from both days are available on request. Thank you, Nguyen Duy Mao Team HF53KC83Z3

Sign in with Apple never completes for our app. The authorization sheet presents, the user confirms, and we get ASAuthorizationError 1000. The akd log shows the local entitlement check PASSING and the failure happening server-side. Environment: native ASAuthorizationAppleIDProvider (no web flow, no Services ID), TestFlight build, iOS 26. New App ID created 2026-08-06. akd, abridged — local check passes: akd Requesting password only: NO akd Client has default access level in SiwA entitlement akd Client has underage-users access level in SiwA entitlement sheet presents, user confirms: akd presenting authorization UI for request akd Remote view sent a user response event akd Attempting authorization with response then the server rejects it, after returning HTTP 200: akd Adding passwordlessToken: NO, and idmsDataToken: NO, to auth-params akd No password, but CK is available. Will ask for ck-based auth. akd Performing SRP request with context akd Task ... received response, status 200 content K akd AppleIDAuthSupport: setError: 2:M2 missing (bad password) akd Invalid/missing value for key acname: (null) akd SRP authentication with server failed! Domain=com.apple.AppleIDAuthSupport Code=2 akd Error performing auth request: Domain=AKAuthenticationError Code=-7003 What we have already ruled out: Sign in with Apple enabled on the App ID, configured as "Enable as a primary App ID" (verified in the portal UI, not just via the App Store Connect API). Provisioning profiles deleted and regenerated AFTER enabling the capability, twice, the second time a full day later. The embedded .mobileprovision in the shipped build contains com.apple.developer.applesignin = (Default). The signed binary carries the entitlement (codesign -d --entitlements on the archive). More than 24 hours elapsed since enabling the capability, per the guidance on -7003 in thread 789697. requestedScopes tried as both [.email] and [.fullName, .email]. App deleted and reinstalled; device restarted. Reproduced on a SECOND device (an iPad) that had never had the app installed. Control: a third-party App Store app created a brand-new Sign in with Apple association (it prompted for name, so first-time consent) on the same device and same Apple ID, minutes after our failure, so the account and device can create new associations. Question: what causes Apple's identity service to reject the SRP exchange for one client while accepting it for others on the same device and account? Is there additional App ID or account state we cannot see from the portal? Happy to provide the full akd log.

Hi, we are currently investigating an issue with Kerberos support in one of our apps. The apps are deployed as managed apps via MDM, together with the new extensible SSO Kerberos profile. In this scenario, Ivanti EPMM is used as MDM, and the extensible SSO configuration has placeholders for the actual user principal name that get filled with the users actual information from our directory. In general, the setup works fine, the Kerberos tickets are requested and supplied to the device, and the SSO extension is providing them to the service. However, in our test MDM environment we enroll i.e. iPad test devices with different test users from our directory and change those users during testing to switch between defined personas. We observed that the credentials acquired by the Kerberos SSO extension dialogue persist even after MDM unenrollment, and even after a device reset. Even if we enroll back to MDM with another user, the previous principal name shows in the SSO extension dialogue and cannot be changed. To us, this seems like a design issue. We use same Apple ID when running these tests, so I suspect that the credential caching could be at Keychain level. Regardless of where they are cached, since the configuration was a managed one, I would expect it to clear the credentials after unenrollment and at least after a device reset. We found some article regarding macOS on the internet, which seems to go into a similar direction however the author states that the credentials could be removed with MDM removal. https://automatica.com.au/2026/01/remove-additional-platform-single-sign-on-credentials-saved-in-macos-when-using-psso-with-microsoft-365-entra-and-company-portal/ Question: How are we supposed to get Kerberos SSO credentials cleared on iOS devices? Is this a known issue, or something that does not work as designed?

We have observed significant UI changes to the SFUnlock login experience in the latest macOS Golden Gate Beta. After entering the account password at the SFUnlock screen,user has to click on Use Password button once and then click on the OK button to proceed to the desktop and for the login process to continue successfully. This behaviour is consistently reproducible in our testing. We would like to understand: 1.Is this a known issue with the current macOS Golden Gate Beta? 2.Is this expected behaviour due to the UI redesign, or is it considered a bug? 3.If it is a known issue, is there a fix planned for an upcoming beta or the final release? Any information or guidance would be appreciated. Thank you.

We have a macOS application that adds entries to the Authorization Database (system.login.console) as part of its setup. We observed that after upgrading from macOS Tahoe to the macOS Golden Gate beta, the entries added by our application were removed, and the default system.login.console configuration was restored. Is this expected behavior in the current Golden Gate beta, or is it a known issue? If it is a known issue, is there an expectation that it will be addressed in a future beta release? Additionally, is there any recommended approach for preserving or restoring application-specific Authorization Database entries across major macOS upgrades? It would be of great help if there is any suggested approach for the same.

Trying to find the best place to get guidance from Apple on this issue. Apple support has suggested this Forum. We are trying to get our BIMI to show in iOS devices but so far in the inbox it does not show. But the email header indicates all is good, BIMI=pass. Not sure where to turn to next. My ticket is 20000127527288 with Apple support. But where to get appropriate feedback on our issue is what I'm looking for guidance.

Hi, We are looking for guidance on synchronizing a user’s login keychain passphrase after changing that user’s local account password, when the user is not currently logged in. Context We have an MDM product for macOS, and we sometimes need to change a local account password while that user is not logged in. Updating the account password itself from our privileged daemon is fine. The hard part is keeping their login keychain in sync — that only seems to work when we run as that user, in their own session. So we perform the keychain update from a per-user LaunchAgent, not from root. What works (user is logged in) From the user’s LaunchAgent we run: # 1) Change account password (if not already changed) dscl . -passwd "/Users/<username>" "<currentPassword>" "<newPassword>" # 2) Sync login keychain passphrase security set-keychain-password -o "<currentPassword>" -p "<newPassword>" login.keychain-db With correct current/new secrets, this succeeds when the helper is running as that user while they are logged in. What fails (user is not logged in) Starting the same LaunchAgent for that user fails with: Bootstrap failed: 125: Domain does not support specified action So we cannot get user-context execution for the keychain update while the user is not logged in. Approaches we already tried Post-login LaunchAgent — We stage the current/new passwords and install a LaunchAgent that runs after the user logs in to migrate the keychain. By the time the user is logged in and the agent runs, macOS has already created a new login keychain and renamed the previous one (e.g. login.keychain-db-renamed-N). At that point we can no longer reliably migrate/restore the original keychain. sudo -u <username> security set-keychain-password … from a root daemon — Led to Keychain Access / keychain state corruption in our testing; we do not consider this a production path. Delete the login keychain — Works as a reset, but discards saved credentials. Acceptable for some admin reset flows; not acceptable for a password change where we know both secrets and want to preserve the keychain. Ask Is there a supported way to update login.keychain-db for a user who is not logged in, given known current and new passphrases, without deleting the keychain? If so, what is that way? If not is there a way to merge the old login keychain as we have the old password too? Also please confirm whether updating another user’s login keychain from root / sudo -u is unsupported, so we can exclude it from product design. Happy to provide sanitized logs (error 125, security failures, renamed keychain timelines) if useful. Thanks.

We ship a credential provider extension (ASCredentialProviderViewController, ProvidesPasskeys = true) backed by a USB CCID smart card token. It works on iOS 26.6. On iOS 27.0, TKSmartCard.beginSession() inside the extension never returns during a passkey request. The CryptoTokenKit log shows why. When a passkey request starts, AuthenticationServicesAgent takes an exclusive session on the reader to check whether it is a hardware security key. The check takes about 7 ms and comes back negative — our token has no FIDO applet. The agent then keeps the session for the rest of the request anyway. Our extension asks for the card 0.2 s later and gets queued behind it: 14:24:13.687776 usbsmartcardreaderd session requested by pid 2116 (1 now queued) 14:24:13.687793 usbsmartcardreaderd session busy (held by pid 2095); notifying holder 14:24:13.687849 AuthenticationServicesAgent got request for used session, setting flag to release it ASAP 14:24:34.884294 AuthenticationServicesAgent got request for used session, setting flag to release it ASAP 14:25:19.851779 AuthenticationServicesAgent got request for used session, setting flag to release it ASAP 14:26:12.501296 AuthenticationServicesAgent endSession 14:26:12.502320 usbsmartcardreaderd session granted to pid 2116 pid 2095 is the agent, pid 2116 is our extension. The system tells the holder three times that someone is waiting; it is released 118.8 s later, when the passkey request itself times out — by which point the card is useless to us. So it deadlocks: the agent holds the card until the request finishes, and the request cannot finish until we get the card to sign the assertion. One detail suggests this is not deliberate. The agent takes the session twice in a row and runs the identical check both times. The first one it releases after a second; the second one is the one that sticks. We saw the same pattern on two different days. We have not found any point in the request where the card is free. Things that do not work: grabbing it as early as viewDidLoad; grabbing it in provideCredentialWithoutUserInteraction before any UI appears; holding it in the containing app and handing it over once the extension starts (the queue is FIFO and the agent is ahead of us); and simply waiting, since the block lasts exactly as long as the request does. Has anyone else hit this? Has anyone shipped a smart-card-backed credential provider on iOS 27 and found a way around it? Is there any way to stop the system from claiming an attached reader while a passkey request is in flight — a setting, an Info.plist key, something on the relying party side, anything at all? We would happily take an ugly workaround at this point. And if you hit this and got nowhere either, that is useful to hear too — it would tell us this is not specific to our token. Questions Once the check has come back negative, the reader is known not to be a security key. Is there a supported way to make the agent release it at that point, or for an extension to declare that it needs exclusive access? Can this be turned off from Safari or from the relying party side? For an assertion (navigator.credentials.get): does hints: ["client-device"], or leaving usb out of transports in allowCredentials, stop the agent from claiming the reader? If so, that is a real mitigation for anyone who controls their own relying party. (authenticatorSelection.authenticatorAttachment only exists on registration options, so it is not available here.) Is TKSmartCard.beginSession() meant to block indefinitely, with no timeout and no cancellation? It bridges beginSessionWithReply:, so Swift concurrency cancellation does not reach it either. Failing with an error after a bounded wait would at least make this diagnosable instead of presenting as a hang. Filed as FB24171032 with a minimal sample project and full logs. Hardware, in case it matters: Aktiv Rutoken ECP, USB CCID. Any CCID reader without a FIDO applet should behave the same. iPhone 15 Pro on iOS 27.0 fails; iPhone 17 Pro on iOS 26.6 works, same binary and same token.

I am looking for help diagnosing a Sign in with Apple failure that occurs after Face ID and before a credential is returned. Environment iPhone 15 Pro iOS 26.2 Xcode 26.3 TestFlight distribution builds Team ID 42U……D944 Bundle IDs com.vybers.vybers-ios com.vybers.vybers Reproduction Install the app from TestFlight. Tap Sign in with Apple. Complete Face ID. Face ID succeeds but the authorization sheet reports that registration could not be completed. The app receives no ASAuthorizationAppleIDCredential and no identityToken. The same behavior occurs Across multiple builds. On multiple physical devices. With multiple Apple IDs. In both Bundle IDs belonging to the same team. In Apple's official Juice sample app using the official Sign in with Apple flow. Control experiment The same iPhone successfully signs in with Apple in a newly downloaded unrelated App Store app. The relevant device log captured immediately after the failure includes Apple server response HTTP 200 AppleIDAuthSupport setError 2M2 missing bad password SRP authentication with server failed AKRemoteViewController did complete with authorization null AKAuthenticationServerError Code=-24000 The “bad password” text is confusing but the Apple ID works in unrelated apps and the failure happens after successful Face ID. The application server is never contacted because no credential or identityToken is produced. Could this be caused by a team-scoped Sign in with Apple/AuthKit registration or synchronization problem rather than by the client implementation or server-side token verification In particular I would appreciate guidance on Checking the Sign in with Apple registration for the team. Checking whether multiple client IDs in one team can become stale or out of sync. Whether an individual Developer Program membership changes any requirement for this flow. Which diagnostic information Apple needs to investigate the AuthKit backend response. I can provide the full Team ID build details signing entitlements and a sysdiagnose through a private support case.

iPadOS 27.0 developer beta not auto-dismissing "Use security key" system popup after authentication. iPadOS 26.6 did not require the user to "X" the popup after auth. I restored to iPadOS 26.6 on same device which seems to confirm that it is iPadOS 27.0 developer beta related. Is this a known issue in the 27 betas, or an intended behaviour change to remote authorization UI dismissal that apps should adapt to? Thank you for any info you might share on this.

Hi all, I tried to implement Apple Login in my Expo App for iOS (as I also want to use Google login and Apple makes Apple login mandatory in this case). But I always get an error when I try to sign in. Problem Sign in with Apple never completes. The system sheet appears, the user taps "Continue", then the sheet shows "Sign up not completed" and the API returns: ASAuthorizationError with message "The user canceled the authorization attempt" (no error code is provided; the error object is otherwise empty) This happens on every attempt, with no user cancellation involved. What I have already verified App ID capability: APPLE_ID_AUTH is enabled with setting APPLE_ID_AUTH_APP_CONSENT = PRIMARY_APP_CONSENT (verified via App Store Connect API and visible as enabled in the Developer Portal UI). Provisioning profile: freshly generated AFTER enabling the capability. Decoded profile contains: com.apple.developer.applesigninDefault Signed binary: I downloaded the built IPA and inspected it. codesign -d --entitlements shows: com.apple.developer.applesignin = ["Default"] The embedded.mobileprovision inside the IPA is the newly generated one. No app extensions: the IPA contains no PlugIns directory, so there is no bundled extension missing the entitlement. Not account-specific: reproduced with two different Apple IDs (both with two-factor authentication enabled). Not bundle-ID or distribution-specific: reproduced with both com.enplace.app.dev (Ad Hoc) and com.enplace.recipes (App Store build distributed via TestFlight). No stale authorization: Settings > Apple Account > Sign in with Apple lists no entry for this app. Agreements: "Free Apps" agreement is active. Expected signInAsync() returns a credential with an identityToken. Actual Promise rejects with "The user canceled the authorization attempt" without any user cancellation, on every attempt, on all tested configurations. Environment Device: iPhone SE (Touch ID), iOS 26.5.2 Framework: React Native / Expo SDK 56 with expo-apple-authentication (wraps ASAuthorizationController; no custom native code involved) The app bundles no app extensions Capability was enabled on 2026-07-28; still failing on 2026-07-29 Has anyone found the actual cause for this? Several older threads describe the same symptom, but none of them ends with a resolution.

Hi all, I just enabled Sign in with Apple for my app for the first time. The app is built with FlutterFlow using its native Authenticate with Apple action. When I tap Sign in with Apple, nothing happens: the Apple authorization sheet never appears. To investigate further, I created a custom action that directly calls: SignInWithApple.getAppleIDCredential(...) and catches any exception. It consistently returns: SignInWithAppleAuthorizationException( AuthorizationErrorCode.unknown, The operation couldn't be completed. (Error Domain=com.apple.AuthenticationServices.AuthorizationError Code=1000) ) The app is distributed through TestFlight and the issue occurs on a real device. I'm wondering whether anyone has experienced the same behavior after enabling Sign in with Apple on a new App ID. If so: Did the issue resolve itself after some time? Was there any Apple-side propagation delay involved? Or was there an additional FlutterFlow or Apple Developer configuration that I might be missing? What I've already verified ✅ Sign in with Apple capability is enabled on the App ID. ✅ Distribution certificate is valid. ✅ Provisioning profile was regenerated after enabling the capability and lists Sign in with Apple under Enabled Capabilities. ✅ Firebase Authentication has the Apple provider enabled. ✅ Google Sign-In works correctly in the same TestFlight build. ✅ Tested only on a physical device via TestFlight. ✅ Rebuilt and redeployed the app from FlutterFlow after every configuration change. ✅ Disabled Firebase App Check enforcement for Authentication as a test (no change). Any suggestions or similar experiences would be greatly appreciated.

Hello, We already have an existing iOS app on this Apple Developer team that successfully uses Sign in with Apple. However, Sign in with Apple consistently fails for our second and newer App ID, com.siremo.flare, before any Apple credential or identity token is returned. Both apps belong to the same Apple Developer team and have equivalent Sign in with Apple configurations. App information: Affected app: Flare Affected Bundle ID: com.siremo.flare Working existing Bundle ID: com.siremo.aily Team ID: JYGN9K53XA Distribution: iOS Simulator and TestFlight TestFlight build: 0.2.3 (2) Developer Support case: 102947765951 Symptoms: In the iOS Simulator, the Sign in with Apple sheet becomes unresponsive after entering the Apple ID password. In TestFlight on physical devices, the system sheet displays “Sign Up Not Completed”. No Apple credential or identity token is returned to the app. Firebase Authentication and our backend authentication code are never reached. Console output from a reproduction using Apple’s native SwiftUI SignInWithAppleButton: Authorization failed: Error Domain=AKAuthenticationError Code=-7003 "(null)" UserInfo={AKClientBundleID=com.siremo.flare} ASAuthorizationController credential request failed with error: Error Domain=com.apple.AuthenticationServices.AuthorizationError Code=1001 "(null)" The user did not cancel the authorization request. What we have verified: Sign in with Apple is enabled for com.siremo.flare in Certificates, Identifiers & Profiles. Apple Developer Support confirmed that Sign in with Apple is enabled for this App ID under case 102947765951. We removed and re-added the Sign in with Apple capability in Xcode and the Developer Portal. We regenerated the provisioning profile, created a new Archive, and distributed a new TestFlight build. The issue persists. We inspected the entitlements embedded in the actual archived Flare app: application-identifier = JYGN9K53XA.com.siremo.flare com.apple.developer.applesignin = [Default] The embedded provisioning profile contains the same application identifier and Sign in with Apple entitlement. The issue reproduces with multiple Apple ID accounts and multiple physical devices. Flare is our second app and newer App ID on this Apple Developer team. Our existing app, com.siremo.aily, successfully completes Sign in with Apple using: the same Apple Developer team the same physical device the same Apple ID an equivalent native Sign in with Apple implementation an equivalent entitlement and provisioning configuration Only the newer App ID, com.siremo.flare, fails with AKAuthenticationError -7003 and AuthorizationError 1001. We reproduced the same failure using Apple’s native SwiftUI SignInWithAppleButton. This rules out our custom ASAuthorizationController delegate, controller retention, presentation-anchor implementation, and custom button implementation. Our diagnostic logging confirms that the failure occurs before the Apple authorization callback succeeds and before an identity token is issued. Firebase Authentication and our backend are downstream of this callback and are therefore not involved in the failure. The combination of: AKAuthenticationError -7003 AKClientBundleID=com.siremo.flare AuthorizationError 1001 without a user cancellation the “Sign Up Not Completed” system message an existing App ID on the same team working correctly only the second and newer App ID failing the failure reproducing with Apple’s native SignInWithAppleButton appears similar to other reports where existing App IDs continue to work while newly registered App IDs fail, despite having valid Sign in with Apple capabilities, entitlements, and provisioning profiles. Could an Apple engineer please compare the server-side Sign in with Apple registration state of: Working: JYGN9K53XA.com.siremo.aily Failing: JYGN9K53XA.com.siremo.flare and verify whether the newer App ID was correctly registered and propagated in the Sign in with Apple backend? If the registration is incomplete, stuck, or inconsistent, could it be repaired or re-provisioned on Apple’s side? We can provide reproduction timestamps, Archive entitlement dumps, provisioning profile details, screenshots, and additional diagnostic logs if needed. Thank you.

Hi everyone, I am working on an iOS application that utilizes a Broadcast Upload Extension (ReplayKit) to perform local, on-device screen analysis. Currently, we are using RPSystemBroadcastPickerView to allow the user to initiate the broadcast session. However, for our specific tracking use case, requiring the user to manually tap the "Start Broadcast" button every time creates a significant friction point in the user experience. My questions are: Is there any private API, entitlement, or MDM (Mobile Device Management) configuration that allows an app to programmatically start a ReplayKit screen recording session completely in the background without explicit human intervention (e.g., without tapping a button in the UI)? If this is strictly prohibited for consumer apps on the App Store due to privacy guidelines, are there any exceptions or enterprise-level profiles available for supervised devices that bypass the mandatory RPSystemBroadcastPickerView user interaction? My understanding is that Apple enforces this manual trigger and the red status bar indicator for strict security and privacy reasons, but I am looking for an official confirmation on whether any programmatic workaround exists for this in modern iOS versions (iOS 15+). Thank you in advance for your time and clarification!

We are evaluating using the WeatherKit REST API for our app in Mainland China. To ensure compliance with local data protection regulations (such as PIPL / Data Security Law), we need to clarify how location data (latitude and longitude) is routed and stored during WeatherKit API calls. Could someone from Apple or the community clarify the following two questions regarding WeatherKit API calls made within Mainland China: When our server queries the WeatherKit REST API using a location's latitude and longitude from Mainland China, is this coordinate data routed to/processed on servers located outside Mainland China? Data Storage (At-rest): Does Apple store or log these queried coordinates on servers located outside Mainland China? Any official documentation, guidelines, or insights regarding WeatherKit's infrastructure setup for Mainland China would be greatly appreciated.