Hi, we were recently approved for the com.apple.developer.web-browser.public-key-credential entitlement and have added it to our app. It initially worked as expected for a couple of days, but then it stopped working. We're now seeing the same error as before adding the entitlement:
Told not to present authorization sheet: Error Domain=com.apple.AuthenticationServicesCore.AuthorizationError Code=1 "(null)"
ASAuthorizationController credential request failed with error: Error Domain=com.apple.AuthenticationServices.AuthorizationError Code=1004 "(null)"
Do you have any insights into what might be causing this issue?
Thank you!
General
RSS for tagPrioritize user privacy and data security in your app. Discuss best practices for data handling, user consent, and security measures to protect user information.
Selecting any option will automatically load the page
Post
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Hi! We are developing an authentication plugin for macOS that integrates with the system's authentication flow. The plugin is designed to prompt the user for approval via a push notification in our app before allowing access. The plugin is added as the first mechanism in the authenticate rule, followed by the default builtin:authenticate as a fallback.
When the system requests authentication (e.g., during screen unlock), our plugin successfully displays the custom UI and sends a push notification to the user's device. However, I've encountered the following issue:
If the user does not approve the push notification within ~30 seconds, the system resets the screen lock (expected behavior).
If the user approves the push notification within approximately 30 seconds but doesn’t start entering their password before the timeout expires, the system still resets the screen lock before they can enter their password, effectively canceling the session.
What I've Tried:
Attempted to imitate mouse movement after the push button was clicked to keep the session active.
Created a display sleep prevention assertion using IOKit to prevent the screen from turning off.
Used the caffeinate command to keep the display and system awake.
Tried setting the result as allow for the authorization request and passing an empty password to prevent the display from turning off.
I also checked the system logs when this issue occurred and found the following messages:
___loginwindow: -[LWScreenLock (Private) askForPasswordSecAgent] | localUser = >timeout
loginwindow: -[LWScreenLock handleUnlockResult:] _block_invoke | ERROR: Unexpected _lockRequestedBy of:7 sleeping screen
loginwindow: SleepDisplay | enter
powerd: Process (loginwindow) is requesting display idle___
These messages suggest that the loginwindow process encounters a timeout condition, followed by the display entering sleep mode. Despite my attempts to prevent this behavior, the screen lock still resets prematurely.
Questions:
Is there a documented (or undocumented) system timeout for the entire authentication flow during screen unlock that I cannot override?
Are there any strategies for pausing or extending the authentication timeout to allow for complex authentication flows like push notifications?
Any guidance or insights would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!
Hello Apple Developer Community,
We have been experiencing a persistent notification issue in our application, Flowace, after updating to macOS 15 and above. The issue is affecting our customers but does not occur on our internal test machines.
Issue Description
When users share their screen using Flowace, they receive a repetitive system notification stating:
"Flowace has accessed your screen and system audio XX times in the past 30 days. You can manage this in settings."
This pop-up appears approximately every minute, even though screen sharing and audio access work correctly. This behavior was not present in macOS 15.1.1 or earlier versions and appears to be related to recent privacy enhancements in macOS.
Impact on Users
The frequent pop-ups disrupt workflows, making it difficult for users to focus while using screen-sharing features.
No issues are detected in Privacy & Security Settings, where Flowace has the necessary permissions.
The issue is not reproducible on our internal test machines, making troubleshooting difficult.
Our application is enterprise level and works all the time, so technically this pop only comes after a period of not using the app.
Request for Assistance
We would like to understand:
Has anyone else encountered a similar issue in macOS 15+?
Is there official Apple documentation explaining this new privacy behavior?
Are there any interim fixes to suppress or manage these notifications?
What are Apple's prospects regarding this feature in upcoming macOS updates?
A demonstration of the issue can be seen in the following video: https://youtu.be/njA6mam_Bgw
Any insights, workarounds, or recommendations would be highly appreciated!
Thank you in advance for your help.
Best,
Anuj Patil
Flowace Team
I have developed a sample app following the example found Updating your app package installer to use the new Service Management API and referring this discussion on XPC Security.
The app is working fine, I have used Swift NSXPCConnection in favour of xpc_connection_create_mach_service used in the example. (I am running app directly from Xcode)
I am trying to set up security requirements for the client connection using setCodeSigningRequirement on the connection instance.
But it fails for even basic requirement connection.setCodeSigningRequirement("anchor apple").
Error is as follows.
cannot open file at line 46986 of [554764a6e7]
os_unix.c:46986: (0) open(/private/var/db/DetachedSignatures) - Undefined error: 0
xpc_support_check_token: anchor apple error: Error Domain=NSOSStatusErrorDomain Code=-67050 "(null)" status: -67050
I have used codesign -d --verbose=4 /path/to/executable to check the attributes I do get them in the terminal.
Other way round, I have tried XPC service provider sending back process id (pid) with each request, and I am probing this id to get attributes using this code which gives all the details.
func inspectCodeSignature(ofPIDString pidString: String) {
guard let pid = pid_t(pidString) else {
print("Invalid PID string: \(pidString)")
return
}
let attributes = [kSecGuestAttributePid: pid] as CFDictionary
var codeRef: SecCode?
let status = SecCodeCopyGuestWithAttributes(nil, attributes, [], &codeRef)
guard status == errSecSuccess, let code = codeRef else {
print("Failed to get SecCode for PID \(pid) (status: \(status))")
return
}
var staticCode: SecStaticCode?
let staticStatus = SecCodeCopyStaticCode(code, [], &staticCode)
guard staticStatus == errSecSuccess, let staticCodeRef = staticCode else {
print("Failed to get SecStaticCode (status: \(staticStatus))")
return
}
var infoDict: CFDictionary?
if SecCodeCopySigningInformation(staticCodeRef, SecCSFlags(rawValue: kSecCSSigningInformation), &infoDict) == errSecSuccess,
let info = infoDict as? [String: Any] {
print("🔍 Code Signing Info for PID \(pid):")
print("• Identifier: \(info["identifier"] ?? "N/A")")
print("• Team ID: \(info["teamid"] ?? "N/A")")
if let entitlements = info["entitlements-dict"] as? [String: Any] {
print("• Entitlements:")
for (key, value) in entitlements {
print(" - \(key): \(value)")
}
}
} else {
print("Failed to retrieve signing information.")
}
var requirement: SecRequirement?
if SecRequirementCreateWithString("anchor apple" as CFString, [], &requirement) == errSecSuccess,
let req = requirement {
let result = SecStaticCodeCheckValidity(staticCodeRef, [], req)
if result == errSecSuccess {
print("Signature is trusted (anchor apple)")
} else {
print("Signature is NOT trusted by Apple (failed anchor check)")
}
}
var infoDict1: CFDictionary?
let signingStatus = SecCodeCopySigningInformation(staticCodeRef, SecCSFlags(rawValue: kSecCSSigningInformation), &infoDict1)
guard signingStatus == errSecSuccess, let info = infoDict1 as? [String: Any] else {
print("Failed to retrieve signing information.")
return
}
print("🔍 Signing Info for PID \(pid):")
for (key, value) in info.sorted(by: { $0.key < $1.key }) {
print("• \(key): \(value)")
}
}
If connection.setCodeSigningRequirement does not works I plan to use above logic as backup.
Q: Please advise is there some setting required to be enabled or I have to sign code with some flags enabled.
Note: My app is not running in a Sandbox or Hardened Runtime, which I want.
Why are we doing this nonsense?
We want to be able to run builds in a sandbox such that they can only see the paths they are intended to depend on, to improve reproducibility.
With builds with a very large number of dependencies, there's a very large number of paths added to the sandbox, and it breaks things inside libsandbox.
Either it hits some sandbox length limit (sandbox-exec: pattern serialization length 66460 exceeds maximum (65535), Nix issue #4119, worked around: Nix PR 12570), or it hits an assert (this report; also Nix issue #2311).
The other options for sandboxing on macOS are not viable; we acknowledge sandbox-exec and sandbox_init_with_parameters are deprecated; App Sandbox is inapplicable because we aren't an app.
Our use case is closer to a browser, and all the browsers use libsandbox internally.
We could possibly use SystemExtension or a particularly diabolical use of Virtualization.framework, but the former API requires notarization which is close to a no-go for our use case as open source software: it is nearly impossible to develop the software on one's own computer, and it would require us to ship a binary blob (and have the build processes to produce one in infrastructure completely dissimilar to what we use today); it also requires a bunch of engineering time.
Today, we can pretend that code signing/notarization doesn't exist and that we are writing an old-school Unix daemon, because we are one.
The latter is absolutely diabolical and hard to implement.
See this saga about the bug we are facing: Nix issue #4119, Nix issue #2311, etc.
What is going wrong
I can't attach the file fail.sb as it is too large (you can view the failing test case at Lix's gerrit, CL 2870) and run this:
$ sandbox-exec -D _GLOBAL_TMP_DIR=/tmp -f fail.sb /bin/sh
Assertion failed: (diff <= INSTR_JUMP_NE_MAX_LENGTH), function push_jne_instr, file serialize.c, line 240.
zsh: abort sandbox-exec -D _GLOBAL_TMP_DIR=/tmp -f fail.sb /bin/sh
Or a stacktrace:
stacktrace.txt
Credits
Full credits to Jade Lovelace (Lix) for writing the above text and filing a bug.
This is submitted under FB16964888
Hi,
when creating a CryptoTokenKit extension according to https://developer.apple.com/documentation/cryptotokenkit/authenticating-users-with-a-cryptographic-token, it is neccessary to register it under the securityagent in order to make the CTK usable before login. i.e. we want to run
sudo -u _securityagent /Applications/HostApp.app/Contents/MacOS/HostApp
However, even with the empty application the command fails with
illegal hardware instruction sudo -u _securityagent /Applications/HostApp.app/Contents/MacOS/HostApp
I see that it always crashes when the HostApp is sandboxed, but it does not work even without sandboxing (i am sharing the error report message below).
i actually noticed that when the HostApp is sandboxed and I run the above command, the extension starts to be usable even before login, even though i see the HostApp crash. The same does not happen without the sandbox
So I am curious how to in fact properly register the CTK extension under security agent? Also am not sure how to unregister it from the _securityagent
thank you for your help
Version: 1.0 (1)
Code Type: X86-64 (Native)
Parent Process: Exited process [9395]
Responsible: Terminal [399]
User ID: 92
Date/Time: 2025-03-21 18:54:03.0684 +0100
OS Version: macOS 15.3.2 (24D81)
Report Version: 12
Bridge OS Version: 9.3 (22P3060)
Anonymous UUID: 41F9918C-5BCA-01C7-59C2-3E8CFC3F8653
Sleep/Wake UUID: 8AB66C75-3C32-41D4-9BD4-887B0FB468FE
Time Awake Since Boot: 4300 seconds
Time Since Wake: 1369 seconds
System Integrity Protection: enabled
Crashed Thread: 0 Dispatch queue: WMClientWindowManager
Exception Type: EXC_BAD_INSTRUCTION (SIGILL)
Exception Codes: 0x0000000000000001, 0x0000000000000000
Termination Reason: Namespace SIGNAL, Code 4 Illegal instruction: 4
Terminating Process: exc handler [9396]
Application Specific Signatures:
API Misuse
Thread 0 Crashed:: Dispatch queue: WMClientWindowManager
0 libxpc.dylib 0x7ff80667b2bd _xpc_api_misuse + 113
1 libxpc.dylib 0x7ff80665f0e4 xpc_connection_set_target_uid + 187
2 WindowManagement 0x7ffd0b946693 -[WMClientWindowManager _createXPCConnection] + 1011
3 WindowManagement 0x7ffd0b947361 -[WMClientWindowManager _xpcConnection] + 65
4 WindowManagement 0x7ffd0b9447c9 __31-[WMClientWindowManager stages]_block_invoke + 41
5 libdispatch.dylib 0x7ff8067af7e2 _dispatch_client_callout + 8
6 libdispatch.dylib 0x7ff8067bca2c _dispatch_lane_barrier_sync_invoke_and_complete + 60
7 WindowManagement 0x7ffd0b9446fc -[WMClientWindowManager stages] + 268
8 AppKit 0x7ff80b1fd0b7 __54-[NSWMWindowCoordinator initializeStageFramesIfNeeded]_block_invoke + 30
9 libdispatch.dylib 0x7ff8067af7e2 _dispatch_client_callout + 8
10 libdispatch.dylib 0x7ff8067b0aa2 _dispatch_once_callout + 20
11 AppKit 0x7ff80b1fd060 -[NSWMWindowCoordinator initializeStageFramesIfNeeded] + 296
12 AppKit 0x7ff80a3b3701 -[NSWindow _commonInitFrame:styleMask:backing:defer:] + 888
13 AppKit 0x7ff80a3b2f77 -[NSWindow _initContent:styleMask:backing:defer:contentView:] + 1222
14 AppKit 0x7ff80a3b2aa9 -[NSWindow initWithContentRect:styleMask:backing:defer:] + 42
15 SwiftUI 0x7ff917f321e0 0x7ff91776f000 + 8139232
16 SwiftUI 0x7ff917a8e2f2 0x7ff91776f000 + 3273458
17 SwiftUI 0x7ff917bccfba 0x7ff91776f000 + 4579258
18 SwiftUI 0x7ff917f2ca8e 0x7ff91776f000 + 8116878
19 SwiftUI 0x7ff917f24a65 0x7ff91776f000 + 8084069
20 SwiftUI 0x7ff917f21540 0x7ff91776f000 + 8070464
21 SwiftUI 0x7ff91849e9f1 0x7ff91776f000 + 13826545
22 SwiftUICore 0x7ffb13103ea5 0x7ffb12c81000 + 4730533
23 SwiftUICore 0x7ffb13102e0f 0x7ffb12c81000 + 4726287
24 SwiftUI 0x7ff91849e903 0x7ff91776f000 + 13826307
25 SwiftUI 0x7ff91849bc1c 0x7ff91776f000 + 13814812
26 AppKit 0x7ff80a54f191 -[NSApplication _doOpenUntitled] + 422
27 AppKit 0x7ff80a4efc59 __58-[NSApplication(NSAppleEventHandling) _handleAEOpenEvent:]_block_invoke + 237
28 AppKit 0x7ff80a963818 __102-[NSApplication _reopenWindowsAsNecessaryIncludingRestorableState:withFullFidelity:completionHandler:]_block_invoke + 101
29 AppKit 0x7ff80a4ef6fa __97-[NSDocumentController(NSInternal) _autoreopenDocumentsIgnoringExpendable:withCompletionHandler:]_block_invoke_3 + 148
30 AppKit 0x7ff80a4eee8f -[NSDocumentController(NSInternal) _autoreopenDocumentsIgnoringExpendable:withCompletionHandler:] + 635
31 AppKit 0x7ff80a96373d -[NSApplication _reopenWindowsAsNecessaryIncludingRestorableState:withFullFidelity:completionHandler:] + 269
32 AppKit 0x7ff80a3a6259 -[NSApplication(NSAppleEventHandling) _handleAEOpenEvent:] + 529
33 AppKit 0x7ff80a3a5eb9 -[NSApplication(NSAppleEventHandling) _handleCoreEvent:withReplyEvent:] + 679
34 Foundation 0x7ff807a4b471 -[NSAppleEventManager dispatchRawAppleEvent:withRawReply:handlerRefCon:] + 307
35 Foundation 0x7ff807a4b285 _NSAppleEventManagerGenericHandler + 80
36 AE 0x7ff80e0e4e95 0x7ff80e0da000 + 44693
37 AE 0x7ff80e0e4723 0x7ff80e0da000 + 42787
38 AE 0x7ff80e0de028 aeProcessAppleEvent + 409
39 HIToolbox 0x7ff81217b836 AEProcessAppleEvent + 55
40 AppKit 0x7ff80a39ee6a _DPSNextEvent + 1725
41 AppKit 0x7ff80adf38b8 -[NSApplication(NSEventRouting) _nextEventMatchingEventMask:untilDate:inMode:dequeue:] + 1290
42 AppKit 0x7ff80a38faa9 -[NSApplication run] + 610
43 AppKit 0x7ff80a362d34 NSApplicationMain + 823
44 SwiftUI 0x7ff9177a7da1 0x7ff91776f000 + 232865
45 SwiftUI 0x7ff917af0d40 0x7ff91776f000 + 3677504
46 SwiftUI 0x7ff917d8fef8 0x7ff91776f000 + 6426360
47 Crescendo CryptoTokenKit 0x10b1baf6e static HostApp.$main() + 30
48 Crescendo CryptoTokenKit 0x10b1bd2f9 main + 9 (HostApp.swift:24)
49 dyld 0x7ff8065c82cd start + 1805
I am developing a background program that is included in the app as an extension. I would like to include logic to check the teamID and code signature validity of the program I created to ensure that it has not been tampered with. Is this possible?
Hi,
I am creating a custom login window, so I am using SFAuthorizationpluginView, here I want to hide Submit Arrow botton which gets displayed beside username and password text feild
, is there a way to hide this, please suggest.
Hello,
I’m planning to develop a custom referral-based attribution system for my app. The goal is to log the number of installs that come from unique referral links and then track subsequent in‑app analytics (for example, when a user reaches level 5 in a game). I’d also like to capture the user’s country to further segment these analytics.
I want to build this system myself—without relying on third‑party services (such as AppsFlyer or Branch) since I only need a few key data points and want to keep costs low. However, I’m aware of the privacy restrictions in iOS and want to ensure that my implementation complies with Apple’s guidelines.
Specifically, I would appreciate guidance on the following:
Permissible Signals:
Is it acceptable to log signals like IP address (or a suitably anonymized version), device model, and timestamp to help correlate the referral click to a successful install and subsequent in‑app events?
Are there any other recommended non‑PII signals that can be used to confirm a referral install without risking rejection during App Review?
Best Practices:
What are the best practices for handling and transmitting these signals (e.g., should IP addresses be truncated or hashed)?
How can I ensure that my system remains compliant with Apple’s App Tracking Transparency and other privacy guidelines?
I’d appreciate any insights or references to relevant documentation that might help me build this system without getting rejected by Apple.
Thank you in advance for your assistance!
can i get transferid by /auth/usermigrationinfo api before transfered app?
https://developer.apple.com/documentation/sign_in_with_apple/transferring-your-apps-and-users-to-another-team#Generate-the-transfer-identifier
I am developing a sample authorization plugin to sync the user’s local password to the network password. During the process, I prompt the user to enter both their old and new passwords in custom plugin. After the user enters the information, I use the following code to sync the passwords:
try record.changePassword(oldPssword, toPassword: newPassword)
However, I have noticed that this is clearing all saved keychain information, such as web passwords and certificates. Is it expected behavior for record.changePassword to clear previously stored keychain data?
If so, how can I overcome this issue and ensure the keychain information is preserved while syncing the password?
Thank you for your help!
I have Authorisation Plugin which talks using XPC to my Launch Daemon to perform privileged actions.
I want to protect my XPC service narrowing it to be called from known trusted clients.
Now since I want authorisation plugin code which is from apple to call my service, I cannot use my own team id or app group here.
I am currently banking on following properties of client connection.
Apple Team ID : EQHXZ8M8AV
Bundle ID starting with com.apple.
Client signature verified By Apple.
This is what I have come up with.
func isClientTrusted(connection: NSXPCConnection) -> Bool {
let clientPID = connection.processIdentifier
logInfo("🔍 Checking XPC Client - PID: \(clientPID)")
var secCode: SecCode?
var secStaticCode: SecStaticCode?
let attributes = [kSecGuestAttributePid: clientPID] as NSDictionary
let status = SecCodeCopyGuestWithAttributes(nil, attributes, [], &secCode)
guard status == errSecSuccess, let code = secCode else {
logInfo("Failed to get SecCode for PID \(clientPID)")
return false
}
let staticStatus = SecCodeCopyStaticCode(code, [], &secStaticCode)
guard staticStatus == errSecSuccess, let staticCode = secStaticCode else {
logInfo("Failed to get SecStaticCode")
return false
}
var signingInfo: CFDictionary?
let signingStatus = SecCodeCopySigningInformation(staticCode, SecCSFlags(rawValue: kSecCSSigningInformation), &signingInfo)
guard signingStatus == errSecSuccess, let info = signingInfo as? [String: Any] else {
logInfo("Failed to retrieve signing info")
return false
}
// Extract and Verify Team ID
if let teamID = info["teamid"] as? String {
logInfo("XPC Client Team ID: \(teamID)")
if teamID != "EQHXZ8M8AV" { // Apple's official Team ID
logInfo("Client is NOT signed by Apple")
return false
}
} else {
logInfo("Failed to retrieve Team ID")
return false
}
// Verify Bundle ID Starts with "com.apple."
if let bundleID = info["identifier"] as? String {
logInfo("XPC Client Bundle ID: \(bundleID)")
if !bundleID.hasPrefix("com.apple.") {
logInfo("Client is NOT an Apple system process")
return false
}
} else {
logInfo("Failed to retrieve Bundle Identifier")
return false
}
// Verify Apple Code Signature Trust
var trustRequirement: SecRequirement?
let trustStatus = SecRequirementCreateWithString("anchor apple" as CFString, [], &trustRequirement)
guard trustStatus == errSecSuccess, let trust = trustRequirement else {
logInfo("Failed to create trust requirement")
return false
}
let verifyStatus = SecStaticCodeCheckValidity(staticCode, [], trust)
if verifyStatus != errSecSuccess {
logInfo("Client's signature is NOT trusted by Apple")
return false
}
logInfo("Client is fully verified as Apple-trusted")
return true
}
Q: Just wanted community feedback, is this correct approach?
I am developing an Authorisation Plugin which talks to Launch daemons over XPC.
Above is working neat, now I have to decide on how to get it installed on a machine.
Installation requires.
Plugin Installation
Launch Daemon Installation
Both require
Moving binary and text (.plist) file into privileged system managed directory.
Firing install/load commands as root (sudo).
I have referred this post BSD Privilege Escalation on macOS, but I am still not clear how to approach this.
Q: My requirement is:
I can use .pkg builder and install via script, however I have some initialisation task that needs to be performed. User will enter some details talk to a remote server and get some keys, all goes well restarts the system and my authorisation plugin will welcome him and get him started.
If I cannot perform initialisation I will have to do it post restart on login screen which I want to avoid if possible.
I tried unconventional way of using AppleScript from a SwiftUI application to run privileged commands, I am fine if it prompts for admin credentials, but it did not work.
I don't want that I do something and when approving it from Apple it gets rejected.
Basically, how can I provide some GUI to do initialisation during installation or may be an app which helps in this.
Q: Please also guide if I am doing elevated actions, how will it affect app distribution mechanism. In Read Me for EvenBetterAuthorizationSample I read it does.
Thanks.
I have a launch daemon that's using the Endpoint Security framework which also is causing high memory usage (in Activity Monitor memory column shows for example 2GB and Real Memory 11MB) when building a big project in Xcode. Is it some kind of memory caching by the system? leaks -forkCorpse seems to not show any leaks.
How can I attach with heap or Instruments without the process being killed with "ENDPOINTSECURITY, Code 2 EndpointSecurity client terminated because it failed to respond to a message before its deadline"?
Hi everyone,
I’ve been working on storing keys and passwords in the macOS Keychain using the Keychain Services API. Specifically, I’m leveraging SecAccessControlCreateWithFlags to bind items to access control flags, and overall, it’s been working smoothly.
I have a question regarding the .applicationPassword flag of SecAccessControlCreateWithFlags. While it successfully prompts the user to input a password, there are no apparent password rules, even a simple “1” is accepted.
My questions are:
Is there a way to enforce strong password requirements when using the .applicationPassword flag?
If enforcing strong passwords isn’t possible, is there an alternative approach to provide a predefined strong password during the creation process, bypassing the need for user input?
With SecAccessControlCreateWithFlags, I noticed the item isn’t stored in the traditional file-based Keychain but in an iOS-style Keychain, is there a way to store it in a file-based Keychain while marking it as unexportable?
I appreciate any insights or suggestions.
Thank you!
Neil
News link: https://developer.apple.com/news/?id=12m75xbj
If your app offers Sign in with Apple, you’ll need to use the Sign in with Apple REST API to revoke user tokens when deleting an account.
I'm not good English. I'm confused about the above sentence
Do I have to use REST API unconditionally or can I just delete to the account data?
Topic:
Privacy & Security
SubTopic:
General
Tags:
App Review
Sign in with Apple REST API
Sign in with Apple
I am developing an Authorization plugin for macOS that should be invoked when a user unlocks their device from the lock screen. Based on advice from the other threads in these forums, I have understood that:
The plugin needs to use SFAuthorizationPluginView
The auth db entries to modify are system.login.screensaver and authenticate
I found the NameAndPassword sample and after making some tweaks to it was able to get it to work from screensaver unlock.
I am trying to add Webview-based authentication to the plugin, but have not had any success. The plugin window's width does not change (though the height does) and only a small portion of the HTML gets rendered. Is Webview-based authentication supported with SFAuthorizationPluginView? Are there any alternatives?
Developers of our e-shop are preparing to enable Apple Sign In for account login.
Apple ID verification is conducted via the domain appleid.apple.com, and the responses should be coming back from the following two Apple IP addresses:
IPv4 Address: 17.32.194.6
IPv4 Address: 17.32.194.37
Question is whether these addresses are correct and if they remain unchanged over time. Alternatively, it is existing an official list of IP addresses that may be used for Apple Sign In verification response?
This is necessary to ensure precise network communication settings and protection by F5 security solution.
Thanks a lot for answers.
Hi Apple Developer Team,
I am encountering an issue with the “Sign in with Apple” feature. While implementing this functionality in my dotnet application, I noticed that the user’s first name and last name are not being returned, even though I have explicitly requested the name scope. However, the email and other requested information are returned successfully.
Here are the details of my implementation: 1. Scope Requested: name, email 2. Response Received: Email and other data are present, but fullName is missing or null. 3. Expected Behavior: I expected to receive the user’s first and last name as per the fullName scope.
I have verified the implementation and ensured that the correct scopes are being passed in the request.
Could you please help clarify the following? 1. Are there specific conditions under which Apple may not return the user’s fullName despite the scope being requested? 2. Is there a recommended approach or fallback mechanism to handle this scenario? 3. Could this behavior be related to a limitation or change in the API, or might it be an issue on my end?
I also came to know that for initial sign in the user details will be displayed in the signin-apple payload as Form data but how do I fetch those form-data from the signin-apple request, please suggest
I would greatly appreciate any guidance or solutions to resolve this issue.
Thank you for your support!
Hi,
how can you authenticate a User through Biometrics with iPhone Passcode as Fallback in the Autofill Credential Provider Extension?
In the App it works without a problem. In the Extension I get
"Caller is not running foreground"
Yeah, it isn't, as it's just a sheet above e.g. Safari.
I'd like to avoid having the user setup a Passcode dedicated to my App, especially because FaceID is way faster.
Does anybody know how to achieve iOS native Auth in the extension?
Please let me know, a code sample would be appreciated.
Regards,
Mia
Topic:
Privacy & Security
SubTopic:
General
Tags:
Face ID
Touch ID
Local Authentication
Authentication Services