func oneStepForward(_ input: Int) -> Int { return input + 1 } func oneStepBackward(_ input: Int) -> Int { return input - 1 } func chooseStepFunction(backward: Bool) -> (Int) -> Int { return backward ? oneStepBackward : oneStepForward //Error. type of expression is ambiguous without a type annotation } Why am I getting this error ? If I change this function to the following it works and will compile. func chooseStepFunction(backward: Bool) -> (Int) -> Int { if backward { return oneStepBackward } else { return oneStepForward } } // Why am I getting the error in the previous version while it works in the second version ? Thx in advance.

Hello, While watching WWDC25: Code-along: Elevate an app with Swift concurrency at timestamp 25:48, I noticed something in the slide/diagram that might be incorrect. The diagram shows ExtractSticker twice, but based on the code context and spoken explanation, I think it was meant to be ExtractSticker and ExtractColor. Reasoning: The surrounding code and narration describe the use of async let and a Sendable Data object. From the flow, one task extracts a sticker while the other extracts a color, so it seems like the diagram is inconsistent. I do understand that with @concurrent, having two ExtractSticker operations on the same Data is technically possible (with two concurrent process executing their respective ExtractSticker) — but that would be a different meaning than what the talk was describing. Since concurrency is already a subtle and error-prone topic, I thought it was worth pointing this out. If I’m mistaken, I’d love clarification. Otherwise, this could be a small correction to keep things aligned and clearer for everyone. Minor point overall, but Swift 6’s concurrency model is doing a fantastic job at helping us write safer code—so thank you to the team for that! (Attaching screenshots for reference)

I filed the following issue on swiftlang/swift on GitHub (Aug 8th), and a followup the swift.org forums, but not getting any replies. As we near the release of Swift 6.2, I want to know if what I'm seeing below is expected, or if it's another case where the compiler needs a fix. protocol P1: Equatable { } struct S1: P1 { } // Error: Conformance of 'S1' to protocol 'P1' crosses into main actor-isolated code an can cause data races struct S1Workaround: @MainActor P1 { } // OK // Another potential workaround if `Equatable` conformance can be moved to the conforming type. protocol P2 { } struct S2: Equatable, P2 { } // OK There was a prior compiler bug fix which addressed inhereted protocols regarding @MainActor. For Equatable, one still has to use @MainActoreven when the default actor isolation is MainActor. Also affects Hashable and any other protocol inheriting from Equatable.

I came across a code let myFruitBasket = ["apple":"red", "banana": "yellow", "budbeeri": "dark voilet", "chikoo": "brown"] Can we have range for keys and values of dictionary, it will be convenient for keys print(myFruitBasket.keys[1...3]) // banana, budbeeri, chikoo same for values print(myFruitsBasket.values[1...3]) // yellow, voilet, brown

Hello I want to implement customisation to swift argumentparser, Here are following changes want to do it in my cli changing default footer present in help command output currently help command output coming like this OVERVIEW: clisample USAGE: clisample <subcommand> OPTIONS: --version show the version. -h, --help show the help. SUBCOMMANDS: logs (default) Export logs for clisample processes. See 'clisample --help' for more information.' so instead of See 'clisample --help' for more information.' I want my own string For more details, run 'clisample help <subcommand>' customise error string getting from validation error Error: Missing value for '-t <time>' Help: -t <time> Time window (e.g. 10h, 30m, 2d). Usage: clisample logs --time <time> See 'clisample logs --help' for more information. so I want error output with example and customised footer, like this Error: Missing value for '-t <time>' Help: -t <time> Time window (e.g. 10h, 30m, 2d). Usage: clisample logs --time <time> Example: clisample logs -t 5m For more details, run 'clisample help <subcommand>' Is this changes possible from anyway?

Undefined symbols for architecture arm64: "_swift_coroFrameAlloc", referenced from: NvMobileCore.Constraint.isActive.modify : Swift.Bool in NvMobileCore[5] NvMobileCore.Constraint.isActive.modify : Swift.Bool in NvMobileCore[5] NvMobileCore.NvMobileCoreManager.delegate.modify : NvMobileCore.NvPublicInterface? in NvMobileCore[53] NvMobileCore.NvMobileCoreManager.delegate.modify : NvMobileCore.NvPublicInterface? in NvMobileCore[53] NvMobileCore.NvMobileCoreManager.language.modify : Swift.String in NvMobileCore[53] NvMobileCore.NvMobileCoreManager.language.modify : Swift.String in NvMobileCore[53] ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture arm64 clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)

Error: "Attrubute can only be applied to types not declarations" on line 2 : @unchecked @unchecked enum ReminderRow : Hashable, Sendable { case date case notes case time case title var imageName : String? { switch self { case .date: return "calendar.circle" case .notes: return "square.and.pencil" case .time: return "clock" default : return nil } } var image : UIImage? { guard let imageName else { return nil } let configuration = UIImage.SymbolConfiguration(textStyle: .headline) return UIImage(systemName: imageName, withConfiguration: configuration) } var textStyle : UIFont.TextStyle { switch self { case .title : return .headline default : return .subheadline } } }

Xcode downloaded a crash report for my app that crashed when trying to insert a String into a Set<String>. Apparently there was an assertion failure ELEMENT_TYPE_OF_SET_VIOLATES_HASHABLE_REQUIREMENTS. I assume that this assertion failure happened because the hash of the new element didn't match the hash of an equal already inserted element, but regardless, I don't understand how inserting a simple string could trigger this assertion. Here is essentially the code that leads to the crash. path is any file system directory, and basePath is a directory higher in the hierarchy, or path itself. var scanErrorPaths = Set<String>() func main() { let path = "/path/to/directory" let basePath = "/path" let fileDescriptor = open(path, O_RDONLY) if fileDescriptor < 0 { if (try? URL(fileURLWithPath: path, isDirectory: false).checkResourceIsReachable()) == true { scanErrorPaths.insert(path.relativePath(from: basePath)!) return } } extension String { func relativePath(from basePath: String) -> String? { if basePath == "" { return self } guard let index = range(of: basePath, options: .anchored)?.upperBound else { return nil } return if index == endIndex || basePath == "/" { String(self[index...]) } else if let index = self[index...].range(of: "/", options: .anchored)?.upperBound { String(self[index...]) } else { nil } } } crash.crash

I have c++ macOs app(Xcode +14) and I try to add call to swift code. I can't find any simple c++ xcodeproj call to swift code. I create new simple project and fail to build it with error when I try to include #include <SwiftMixTester/SwiftMixTester-Swift.h>: main.m:9:10: error: 'SwiftMixTester/SwiftMixTester-Swift.h' file not found (in target 'CppCallSwift' from project 'CppCallSwift') note: Did not find header 'SwiftMixTester-Swift.h' in framework 'SwiftMixTester' (loaded from '/Users/yanivsmacm4/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/CppCallSwift-exdxjvwdcczqntbkksebulvfdolq/Build/Products/Debug') . Please help.

I can't find any simple c++ xcodeproj call to swift struct using modern c++ swift mix. there is the fibonacci example that is swift app call to c++. Base on fibonacci example I create new simple project and fail to build it with error when I try to include #include <SwiftMixTester/SwiftMixTester-Swift.h> What is wrong? Is it the right place to ask this? Any work project link? Xcode 26.

Title Why doesn’t this async function see external changes to an inout Bool in Release builds (but works in Debug)? Body I have a small helper function that waits for a Bool flag to become true with a timeout: public func test(binding value: inout Bool, timeout maximum: Int) async throws { var count = 0 while value == false { count += 1 try await Task.sleep(nanoseconds: 0_100_000_000) if value == true { return } if count > (maximum * 10) { return } } } I call like this: var isVPNConnected = false adapter.start(tunnelConfiguration: tunnelConfiguration) { [weak self] adapterError in guard let self = self else { return } if let adapterError = adapterError { } else { isVPNConnected = true } completionHandler(adapterError) } try await waitUntilTrue(binding: &isVPNConnected, timeout: 10) What I expect: test should keep looping until flag becomes true (or the timeout is hit). When the second task sets flag = true, the first task should see that change and return. What actually happens: In Debug builds this behaves as expected: when the second task sets flag = true, the loop inside test eventually exits. In Release builds the function often never sees the change and gets stuck until the timeout (or forever, depending on the code). It looks like the while value == false condition is using some cached value and never observes the external write. So my questions are: Is the compiler allowed to assume that value (the inout Bool) does not change inside the loop, even though there are await suspension points and another task is mutating the same variable? Is this behavior officially “undefined” because I’m sharing a plain Bool across tasks without any synchronization (actors / locks / atomics), so the debug build just happens to work? What is the correct / idiomatic way in Swift concurrency to implement this kind of “wait until flag becomes true with timeout” pattern? Should I avoid inout here completely and use some other primitive (e.g. AsyncStream, CheckedContinuation, Actor, ManagedAtomic, etc.)? Is there any way to force the compiler to re-read the Bool from memory each iteration, or is that the wrong way to think about it? Environment (if it matters): Swift: [fill in your Swift version] Xcode: [fill in your Xcode version] Target: iOS / macOS [fill in as needed] Optimization: default Debug vs. Release settings I’d like to understand why Debug vs Release behaves differently here, and what the recommended design is for this kind of async waiting logic in Swift.

I’m stuck with repeated production crashes in my SwiftUI app and I can’t make sense of the traces on my own. The symbolicated reports show the same pattern: Crash on com.apple.CFNetwork.LoaderQ with EXC_BAD_ACCESS / PAC failure Always deep in CFNetwork, most often in URLConnectionLoader::loadWithWhatToDo(NSURLRequest*, _CFCachedURLResponse const*, long, URLConnectionLoader::WhatToDo) No frames from my code, no sign of AuthManager or tokens. What I’ve tried: Enabled Address Sanitizer, Malloc Scribble, Guard Malloc, Zombies. Set CFNETWORK_DIAGNOSTICS=3 and collected Console logs. Stress-tested the app (rapid typing, filter switching, background/foreground, poor network with Network Link Conditioner). Could not reproduce the crash locally. So far: Logs show unrelated performance faults (I/O on main thread, CLLocationManager delegate), but no obvious CFNetwork misuse. My suspicion is a URLSession lifetime or delegate/auth-challenge race, but I can’t confirm because I can’t trigger it. Since starting this investigation, I also refactored some of my singletons into @State/@ObservedObject dependencies. For example, my app root now wires up AuthManager, BackendService, and AccountManager (where API calls happen using async/await) as @State properties: @State var authManager: AuthManager @State var accountManager: AccountManager @State var backendService: BackendService init() { let authManager = AuthManager() self._authManager = .init(wrappedValue: authManager) let backendService = BackendService(authManager: authManager) self._backendService = .init(wrappedValue: backendService) self._accountManager = .init(wrappedValue: AccountManager(backendService: backendService)) } I don’t know if this refactor is related to the crash, but I am including it to be complete. Apologies that I don’t have a minimized sample project — this issue seems app-wide, and all I have are the crash logs. Request: Given the crash location (URLConnectionLoader::loadWithWhatToDo), can Apple provide guidance on known scenarios or misuses that can lead to this crash? Is there a way to get more actionable diagnostics from CFNetwork beyond CFNETWORK_DIAGNOSTICS to pinpoint whether it’s session lifetime, cached response corruption, or auth/redirect? Can you also confirm whether my dependency setup above could contribute to URLSession or backend lifetime issues? I can’t reliably reproduce the crash, and without Apple’s insight the stack trace is effectively opaque to me. Thanks for your time and help. Happy to send multiple symbolicated crash logs at request. Thanks for any help. PS. Including 2 of many similar crash logs. Can provide more if needed. Atlans-2025-07-29-154915_symbolicated (cfloader).txt Atlans-2025-08-08-124226_symbolicated (cfloader).txt

In my code I use a binding that use 2 methods to get and get a value. There is no problem with swift 5 but when I swift to swift 6 the compiler fails : Here a sample example of code to reproduce the problem : `import SwiftUI struct ContentView: View { @State private var isOn = false var body: some View { VStack { Image(systemName: "globe") .imageScale(.large) .foregroundStyle(.tint) Text("Hello, world!") Toggle("change it", isOn: Binding(get: getValue, set: setValue(_:))) } .padding() } private func getValue() -&gt; Bool { isOn } private func setValue(_ value: Bool) { isOn = value } }` Xcode compiler log error : 1. Apple Swift version 6.1.2 (swiftlang-6.1.2.1.2 clang-1700.0.13.5) 2. Compiling with the current language version 3. While evaluating request IRGenRequest(IR Generation for file "/Users/xavierrouet/Developer/TestCompilBindingSwift6/TestCompilBindingSwift6/ContentView.swift") 4. While emitting IR SIL function "@$sSbScA_pSgIeAghyg_SbIeAghn_TR". for &lt;&lt;debugloc at "&lt;compiler-generated&gt;":0:0&gt;&gt;Stack dump without symbol names (ensure you have llvm-symbolizer in your PATH or set the environment var LLVM_SYMBOLIZER_PATH` to point to it): 0 swift-frontend 0x000000010910ae24 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&amp;, int) + 56 1 swift-frontend 0x0000000109108c5c llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() + 112 2 swift-frontend 0x000000010910b460 SignalHandler(int) + 360 3 libsystem_platform.dylib 0x0000000188e60624 _sigtramp + 56 4 libsystem_pthread.dylib 0x0000000188e2688c pthread_kill + 296 5 libsystem_c.dylib 0x0000000188d2fc60 abort + 124 6 swift-frontend 0x00000001032ff9a8 swift::DiagnosticHelper::~DiagnosticHelper() + 0 7 swift-frontend 0x000000010907a878 llvm::report_fatal_error(llvm::Twine const&amp;, bool) + 280 8 swift-frontend 0x00000001090aef6c report_at_maximum_capacity(unsigned long) + 0 9 swift-frontend 0x00000001090aec7c llvm::SmallVectorBase::grow_pod(void*, unsigned long, unsigned long) + 384 10 swift-frontend 0x000000010339c418 (anonymous namespace)::SyncCallEmission::setArgs(swift::irgen::Explosion&amp;, bool, swift::irgen::WitnessMetadata*) + 892 11 swift-frontend 0x00000001035f8104 (anonymous namespace)::IRGenSILFunction::visitFullApplySite(swift::FullApplySite) + 4792 12 swift-frontend 0x00000001035c876c (anonymous namespace)::IRGenSILFunction::visitSILBasicBlock(swift::SILBasicBlock*) + 2636 13 swift-frontend 0x00000001035c6614 (anonymous namespace)::IRGenSILFunction::emitSILFunction() + 15860 14 swift-frontend 0x00000001035c2368 swift::irgen::IRGenModule::emitSILFunction(swift::SILFunction*) + 2788 15 swift-frontend 0x00000001033e7c1c swift::irgen::IRGenerator::emitLazyDefinitions() + 5288 16 swift-frontend 0x0000000103573d6c swift::IRGenRequest::evaluate(swift::Evaluator&amp;, swift::IRGenDescriptor) const + 4528 17 swift-frontend 0x00000001035c15c4 swift::SimpleRequest&lt;swift::IRGenRequest, swift::GeneratedModule (swift::IRGenDescriptor), (swift::RequestFlags)17&gt;::evaluateRequest(swift::IRGenRequest const&amp;, swift::Evaluator&amp;) + 180 18 swift-frontend 0x000000010357d1b0 swift::IRGenRequest::OutputType swift::Evaluator::getResultUncached&lt;swift::IRGenRequest, swift::IRGenRequest::OutputType swift::evaluateOrFatalswift::IRGenRequest(swift::Evaluator&amp;, swift::IRGenRequest)::'lambda'()&gt;(swift::IRGenRequest const&amp;, swift::IRGenRequest::OutputType swift::evaluateOrFatalswift::IRGenRequest(swift::Evaluator&amp;, swift::IRGenRequest)::'lambda'()) + 812 19 swift-frontend 0x0000000103576910 swift::performIRGeneration(swift::FileUnit*, swift::IRGenOptions const&amp;, swift::TBDGenOptions const&amp;, std::__1::unique_ptr&lt;swift::SILModule, std::__1::default_deleteswift::SILModule&gt;, llvm::StringRef, swift::PrimarySpecificPaths const&amp;, llvm::StringRef, llvm::GlobalVariable**) + 176 20 swift-frontend 0x0000000102f61af0 generateIR(swift::IRGenOptions const&amp;, swift::TBDGenOptions const&amp;, std::__1::unique_ptr&lt;swift::SILModule, std::__1::default_deleteswift::SILModule&gt;, swift::PrimarySpecificPaths const&amp;, llvm::StringRef, llvm::PointerUnion&lt;swift::ModuleDecl*, swift::SourceFile*&gt;, llvm::GlobalVariable*&amp;, llvm::ArrayRef&lt;std::__1::basic_string&lt;char, std::__1::char_traits, std::__1::allocator&gt;&gt;) + 156 21 swift-frontend 0x0000000102f5d07c performCompileStepsPostSILGen(swift::CompilerInstance&amp;, std::__1::unique_ptr&lt;swift::SILModule, std::__1::default_deleteswift::SILModule&gt;, llvm::PointerUnion&lt;swift::ModuleDecl*, swift::SourceFile*&gt;, swift::PrimarySpecificPaths const&amp;, int&amp;, swift::FrontendObserver*) + 2108 22 swift-frontend 0x0000000102f5c0a8 swift::performCompileStepsPostSema(swift::CompilerInstance&amp;, int&amp;, swift::FrontendObserver*) + 1036 23 swift-frontend 0x0000000102f5f654 performCompile(swift::CompilerInstance&amp;, int&amp;, swift::FrontendObserver*) + 1764 24 swift-frontend 0x0000000102f5dfd8 swift::performFrontend(llvm::ArrayRef&lt;char const*&gt;, char const*, void*, swift::FrontendObserver*) + 3716 25 swift-frontend 0x0000000102ee20bc swift::mainEntry(int, char const**) + 5428 26 dyld 0x0000000188a86b98 start + 6076 Using Xcode 16.4 / Mac OS 16.4

In this code, I use in some places required init?(coder: (NSCoder?)) { // Init some properties super.init(coder: coder!) } And in other places required init?(coder: NSCoder) { super.init(coder: coder) // Init some properties } Both seem to work. Is there a preferred one ? In which cases ? Or should I always use the second one ? And can super be called at anytime ?

I think have done everything by the book. I added a small Swift file to my Objective-C project. This is code in the project, not in a framework, so I did not use the public keyword: import Foundation @objc TestClass: NSObject { @objc init(){} } Adding this file prompted creating a bridging header and it should have added TestClass into it. I added the import to the Objective-C .m file. This didn't produce an error so the file must be there: #import "SoftServePro-Bridging-Header.h" I made a property for an instance of the class in the .h file: @property(nonatomic,strong) TestClass *test; I cleaned the project and did one compile for the precompiler to populate the bridging header. I have set Defines Module to Yes in Build Settings -> Packaging. I added a line in the .m code to create a TestClass: self.test=[[TestClass alloc]init]; And for my trouble I get the error message Now, this looks to me like TestClass is not in my bridging header because if it were it should know exactly what TestClass is, not just consider it a forward declaration. I haven't figured out any way to look at the actual contents of the bridging header after precompile, so I don't know if TestClass is there or not. The ONLY thing that I have not followed is that the documentation I have read says to put the bridging header in the same folder as the .xcodeproj file, but Xcode put it in with all the source code files (one folder down) and who am I to argue with Xcode??

For a simple, resourceless cocoa apps I used to manually setup the application lifecycle (mimicking what's documented here: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/appkit/nsapplication), so my main.swift would look like: import Cocoa let delegate = SomeDelegate() _ = NSApplication.shared NSApp.delegate = delegate NSApp.run() This triggers a warning in Xcode 26.2: "Main actor-isolated conformance of SomeDelegate cannot be used in nonisolated context; this is an error in Swift 6 language mode". so what is the recommended way to refactor above so that it is Swift 6 compliant?

During refactoring of an app I made a typo which leads to a misleading error message in Xcode 26.4. I could reproduce it with a small sample code in Swift Playground. Is it a bug which should be reported? Details: I have an array containing two strings. Using a ForEach loop is fine: ForEach(appData.dataArray, id: \.self) { value in Text("\(value.subject)\t\(value.room)") } but with a typo in the Text line I got an error on the ForEach line: ForEach(appData.dataArray, id: \.self) { value in --> Cannot convert value of type '[MyArray]' to expected argument type 'Binding' Text("\(value.subject)\t\(value.subject.room)") } Complete sample code from Swift Playground (macOS 26): import SwiftUI class MyArray : Hashable, Equatable, Identifiable, ObservableObject, Codable { let id = UUID() @Published var subject: String @Published var room : String private enum CodingKeys : String, CodingKey { case subject case room } init(subject : String, room : String) { self.subject = subject self.room = room } func encode(to encoder: Encoder) throws { var container = encoder.container(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self) try container.encode(subject, forKey: .subject) try container.encode(room, forKey: .room) } required init(from decoder: Decoder) throws { let container = try decoder.container(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self) subject = try container.decode(String.self, forKey: .subject) room = try container.decode(String.self, forKey: .room) } static func == (v1: MyArray, v2: MyArray) -> Bool { let result = v1.id == v2.id return result } func hash(into hasher: inout Hasher) { hasher.combine(id) } } public class AppData : ObservableObject { @Published var dataArray : [MyArray] = [] init() { dataArray.append(MyArray(subject: "Foo", room: "Bar")) dataArray.append(MyArray(subject: "Foo", room: "Batz")) } } struct ContentView: View { @EnvironmentObject var appData : AppData var body: some View { ForEach(appData.dataArray, id: \.self) { value in Text("\(value.subject)\t\(value.subject.room)") // to fix the error replace value.subject.room with value.room } } } @main struct MyApp: App { var appData = AppData() var body: some Scene { WindowGroup { ContentView() .environmentObject(appData) } } }

I'm using that repeating timer for processing information repeatedly: actor RepeatingTimer { private var task: Task<Void, Never>? private var isPaused = false func start(duration: Double, onTick: @escaping () -> Void) { task?.cancel() // Cancel any existing timer isPaused = false task = Task { while !Task.isCancelled { // Check if paused if !isPaused { onTick() } // Sleep for the interval try? await Task.sleep(for: .seconds(duration)) } } } func pause() { isPaused = true } func resume() { isPaused = false } func stop() { task?.cancel() task = nil } }` Yet when I call it from another actor with: await timer.start(duration: interval, onTick:{ self.process() }) I get: Sending 'self'-isolated value of non-Sendable type '() -> ()' to actor-isolated instance method 'start(duration:onTick:)' risks causing races in between 'self'-isolated and actor-isolated uses Is there some more stable option for managing repeating timers, or how to solve this error?

I have this simple piece of code that of course correctly ran in Swift 5: func geoRegion()-> CLRegion?{ guard let location=referenceLocation else{ return nil } return CLCircularRegion(center:location.coordinate, radius:50000, identifier:"georeferencing") } func placemarksForAddress(_ address: String) async throws -> [CLPlacemark]?{ if let placemark=placemarkCache[address]{ if placemark.location!.distance(from: referenceLocation!)<100000{ return [placemark] } } do{ guard let geoRegion=self.geoRegion() else { return nil } let placemarks = try await georeferenceQueue.geocodeAddressString( address, in: geoRegion) if placemarks.count>=0{ self.placemarkCache[address]=MKPlacemark(placemark: placemarks[0]) return placemarks } } catch { let placemarks=try await self.placemarkForLocation(referenceLocation) return placemarks } return nil } That now presents error: Sending task-isolated 'geoRegion' to actor-isolated instance method 'geocodeAddressString(_:in:)' risks causing data races between actor-isolated and task-isolated uses

Why doesn’t deinit support async? At the end of a test, I want to wipe data from HealthKit, and it’s delete function is asynchronous.