General: Forums topic: StoreKit Forums tag: In-App Purchase App Store Pathway Simple and safe In-App Purchases Auto-renewable subscriptions In-App Purchase documentation Getting started with In-App Purchase using StoreKit views documentation Supporting business model changes by using the app transaction documentation Testing at all stages of development with Xcode and the sandbox documentation App Store Server Notifications documentation App Store Server API documentation Simplifying your implementation by using the App Store Server Library documentation TN3185: Troubleshooting In-App Purchases availability in Xcode technote TN3186: Troubleshooting In-App Purchases availability in the sandbox technote TN3188: Troubleshooting In-App Purchases availability in the App Store technote Understanding StoreKit workflows sample code Implementing a store in your app using the StoreKit API sample code What’s new in StoreKit and In-App Purchase video

Hi, We've implemented age assurance logic in our app using the DeclaredAgeRange framework to comply with regulations in Brazil (Digital ECA, effective March 17, 2026) and Utah (App Store Accountability Act, effective May 6, 2026). Our implementation calls AgeRangeService.shared.isEligibleForAgeFeatures on app launch to determine whether the current user is subject to age assurance requirements, and proceeds to call requestAgeRange(ageGates:) accordingly. However, after monitoring in production since the Brazil enforcement date, we've consistently observed isEligibleForAgeFeatures returning false for users in regulated regions, with no age range data being returned. What we'd like to clarify: Is isEligibleForAgeFeatures currently returning true for users in Brazil in production (not sandbox)? For Utah — given that HB 498 pushed the developer compliance deadline to May 6, 2027, will isEligibleForAgeFeatures reflect the original May 6, 2026 activation date or the revised 2027 date? Is there a known rollout schedule or gradual activation plan for these regions that would explain why the flag remains false even after the legal enforcement dates have passed? We've seen similar reports from other developers on these forums, so it seems this may be a widespread issue rather than an implementation problem on our end. Any official guidance on the current status of the API in regulated regions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.

I purchased a subscription within my TestFlight macOS build. I would like to access a screen to manage subscriptions and cancel it. How can I do that? I can't find this screen. In the App Store app I can only see my personal purchases.

Hi, Feedback: FB23494579 Using StoreView / ProductView on iOS 27.0 simulator / device hub throws the following error: Error: Accessing State<ProductViewEventConfiguration>'s value without being installed on a View. This will create a new ProductViewEventConfiguration instance each time. Environment macOS 26.5.2 (25F84) Xcode 27.0 beta 2 (27A5209h) Simulator / Device Hub - iPhone 17 Pro (iOS 27.0) Screenshot

Hi, I’m testing an iOS app with auto-renewable subscriptions in the Apple sandbox environment. The app has its own account system. A user can create/log in with different accounts inside the app. The issue I’m seeing is this: I subscribe to the Pro plan using one sandbox Apple ID. Then I log out of the app. I create or log in with a different account inside the app, but still on the same iPhone / same sandbox Apple ID. Inside the app, this new app account is not marked as subscribed. When I try to subscribe again, StoreKit returns: “Item already owned” So Apple recognizes that the Apple ID already owns the subscription, but our app account does not have Pro access yet. The only way to resolve this is to provide a “Restore Purchase” option, so the current app account can restore the subscription already owned by the Apple ID. My questions are: Is this expected behavior for auto-renewable subscriptions? Can this happen in production too, or is it mainly a sandbox behavior? If a user has multiple accounts inside the app but uses the same Apple ID, is the subscription considered owned by the Apple ID and restorable across those app accounts? Is it acceptable/recommended to keep a small “Already subscribed? Restore purchase” option visible on the paywall at all times? If the app wants to prevent the same Apple subscription from being used across multiple internal app accounts, what is the recommended approach? For brand new Apple IDs that have never subscribed before, the normal purchase flow works correctly. Thank you.

Hi, I am unable to sign into the sandbox account on the simulator. Settings > Developer > Sandbox Apple Account > Sign in Xcode: 26.6 (17F113) Xcode Simulator: 16.0 (1063.4) I have even tried on Device Hub on Xcode 27. I vaguely remember being able to sign into the simulator using Questions: Is anyone able to sign into Sandbox account on the simulator / device hub? Is there any workaround? Is this a known issue?

Hello Applet, I’m experiencing an issue with StoreKit on a TestFlight build. My app uses auto-renewable subscriptions through StoreKit and RevenueCat. Configuration already verified: App installed through TestFlight (not debug). Bundle Identifier: com.ciborgu.vytalai Paid Applications agreement is active. In-App Purchase capability is enabled. Three auto-renewable subscriptions exist in App Store Connect. Product IDs match exactly between App Store Connect, RevenueCat and the application. RevenueCat initializes successfully. A Sandbox test account has been created. Tested on a physical iPhone. Device restarted and app reinstalled from TestFlight. VPN and iCloud Private Relay disabled. When attempting to purchase a subscription, the Apple payment sheet never appears. Our diagnostics indicate that StoreKit does not return any available products for the configured Product IDs, preventing the purchase sheet from opening. Expected Product IDs: vytalai_premium_monthly vytalai_premium_yearly vytalai_premium_yearly_intro Could you please verify if there is any issue with the App Store Connect configuration, StoreKit availability, or the processing state of these subscriptions on Apple’s side? If additional logs or diagnostics are required, I can provide them. Thank you. I have already contacted Apple Developer Support regarding this same issue. Previously, I was advised to schedule a technical support meeting. However, when I requested the meeting, my request was declined because of the subject of my issue, so I was unable to speak with an Apple engineer. Since I have now completed all the recommended troubleshooting and the issue still persists, I would greatly appreciate it if this case could be reviewed by the appropriate technical team or a StoreKit engineer. Thank you for your assistance.

Hi everyone, I’m having an issue where my TestFlight build cannot load auto-renewable subscription products from App Store Connect. The app is built with Flutter and uses StoreKit 2 through an in-app purchase implementation. The same subscription system works correctly on Google Play Billing and returns product details/prices there, but on iOS StoreKit returns no subscription products. I tested this on a real iPhone installed from TestFlight, not from Xcode debug and not using a local StoreKit configuration. The app requests four auto-renewable subscription product IDs. The IDs in code exactly match the product IDs in App Store Connect. The app diagnostics show: Platform: iOS StoreKit mode: StoreKit 2 Store available: true Requested IDs: 4 subscription product IDs Returned IDs: none Missing IDs: all requested product IDs Error source: app_store Error code: storekit_no_response Error message: StoreKit: Failed to get response from platform. Store note: The store accepted the query, but did not return details for these product IDs. Things I have already checked: Product IDs match exactly between Flutter code and App Store Connect Bundle ID matches the App Store Connect app record In-App Purchase capability is enabled Subscriptions are in one subscription group Subscription availability is set for all countries/regions The TestFlight build is installed on a real device Local StoreKit configuration was removed StoreKit reports store availability as true App Store Connect / In-App Purchase keys are configured for backend verification The same product-loading flow works on Google Play The current App Store Connect status for the subscriptions is: Subscriptions: Ready to Submit / Ready for Review Localizations: Prepare for Submission Also, the bank information is not submitted yet. My question is: can StoreKit in TestFlight return subscription product details while the first auto-renewable subscriptions are still only “Ready to Submit” and have not yet been submitted with an app version for review? Or will StoreKit return no products until: The first subscriptions are attached to an app version and submitted for review Subscription localizations are fully prepared/submitted Paid agreements, tax, and banking are fully completed Since StoreKit is available and accepts the product query, but returns zero products, I’m trying to understand whether this is expected App Store Connect behavior or if there is another configuration issue I should check. Thanks.

We offer an in-app way for customers to request an Apple refund for an auto-renewable subscription using StoreKit2. Everything worked during testing and verification in the Sandbox and TestFlight phases, but now consistently fails in Production. We present the refund sheet on a button press: .refundRequestSheet(for: transactionID, isPresented: $isPresenting) { result in switch result { case .success(let status): // .success / .userCancelled handled here case .failure(let error): // -> .failed for every user } } We log the outcome of all the requests, success and cancel behaves as expected. Since RefundRequestError only has .duplicateRequest .failed and the localizedDescription is generic, we don't know why it is failing. We have already checked that the transaction are for verified, not revoked, non-upgraded and active subscriptions. The issue only happens in Production. Is there any way to get more information about why a refund request fails or what other configuration needs to verified for this to work? Is there an eligibility window or other non-specified limit that might result in these errors?

Hi, I'm trying to run our StoreKit unit tests with Xcode26.5 on an iOS26.5 simulator. Host computer has macOS26.5. All tests are failing and in the console I see logs such as [SKTestSession] Error saving configuration file: Error Domain=SKInternalErrorDomain Code=3 "(null)" [SKTestSession] Error deleting all transactions: Error Domain=SKInternalErrorDomain Code=3 "(null)" [SKTestSession] Error clearing overrides: Error Domain=SKInternalErrorDomain Code=3 "(null)" [SKTestSession] Error setting value to 1 for identifier 2 for jp.unext.mediaplayer: Error Domain=SKInternalErrorDomain Code=3 "(null)" And the simulator asks me to provide my AppleID. Tests have been broken since at least 26.4 The release notes claims that it has been fixed but not for me. https://developer.apple.com/documentation/ios-ipados-release-notes/ios-ipados-26_5-release-notes#StoreKit-Testing-in-Xcode Does anyone else have the same issue? Reported FB22774836 just in case.

FB: https://feedbackassistant.apple.com/feedback/22556883 We're seeing a small number of production users where both Transaction.currentEntitlements and Transaction.all return zero transactions for a valid, active, non-refunded non-consumable IAP. This makes it impossible to restore the purchase via any StoreKit 2 API. Environment: Xcode 26.4 (Build 17E192) iOS 26.4.1 Direct call to SK2 Transactions.all & Flutter in_app_purchase package v3.2.3 (uses SK2 on iOS 15+) Non-consumable IAP (one-time purchase) What we observe: AppStore.sync() triggers but the purchase stream returns 0 transactions Transaction.all returns empty Transaction.currentEntitlements also returns empty User is confirmed on the correct Apple ID Issue reproduces on both iPhone and Mac for the same Apple ID Issue appears to have started recently for users who previously had no problems Debug log from affected production user: [2026-04-20T08:50:10.744115Z] init: iapAvailable=true [2026-04-20T08:50:10.744566Z] init: isPremium=false [2026-04-20T08:50:10.744567Z] init: triggering silent restorePurchases [2026-04-20T08:50:45.974566Z] restore: started [2026-04-20T08:50:45.986848Z] restore: sk2Transactions count=0 [2026-04-20T08:50:45.993004Z] restore: sk2Direct isVerified=false active=null [2026-04-20T08:50:45.993011Z] restore: sk2Direct inconclusive — falling back to standard restore [2026-04-20T08:51:16.000851Z] restore: timed out after 30s — fallback isPremium=false [2026-04-20T08:51:16.000910Z] restore: completed — succeeded=false foundPurchase=false Unable to reproduce in sandbox — Transaction.all works correctly there. Appears specific to production for a small subset of users. Has anyone else seen this?

This is a StoreKit / ExternalPurchaseCustomLink clarification. Apple DTS asked me to post the follow-up question here. We are designing an SDK for apps that support EU external purchase. In EU storefronts, the app will use ExternalPurchaseCustomLink only: No App Store In-App Purchase will be offered to users. No Product.purchase() will be called. No SKPaymentQueue.add(_:) will be called. The actual purchase will happen only on our external website through the ExternalPurchaseCustomLink flow. Question: In this EU ExternalPurchaseCustomLink-only setup, is it acceptable and supported to call Product.products(for:) / SKProductsRequest only to fetch product display metadata from App Store Connect? The metadata would only be used to display the product list UI, for example: product title / display name localized price currency / priceLocale formatting information The returned Product / SKProduct would not be used to start an App Store purchase. Or should apps avoid Product.products(for:) / SKProductsRequest entirely in EU storefronts where only ExternalPurchaseCustomLink is offered, and use their own product catalog instead?

Hello, I have a problem with the Retention Message API. The default message is not displayed to users when they try to cancel their subscription in the device's Settings app. The API configuration was made with Revenue Request. The request to use this API was approved by Apple for our account. After configuring it for the Sandbox environment, everything worked as expected the image and text were displayed to users. Later, I applied the same configuration to the Production environment. I received the Approved status for the message, but after purchasing the subscription from the App Store, although I can see the subscription in Settings, the retention message is not displayed when I attempt to cancel it. I have tried different Apple accounts from different regions (both EU and non-EU) and tested from physical locations without using a VPN. Also, for clarification, we do not use real-time communication only the default retention message. For additional information: I also tried configuring this message from App Store Connect, as shown in WWDC 2026, but this section is not available under the Subscriptions category. When I deactivate and then reactivate the message, I notice that the deactivated state shows the text status "Waiting for sync (0/9)", while the active state shows "Approved". All other assets have an Approved state. In my case, the message is configured for all subscription types without any filters or other restrictions. What could be causing this problem, and how can I fix it? It seems that the issue is not on my side.

I have a new app (first version, not yet approved) with one auto-renewable subscription. Earlier in development, the subscription loaded and I could complete a sandbox purchase (the StoreKit sheet showed "Sandbox", the price, and my sandbox account). To resolve an App Store Connect submission deadlock, I deleted that subscription and created a new one with a new Product ID. Since then, the new subscription does NOT appear in the sandbox: StoreKit returns no products, so getOfferings (via RevenueCat) returns 0 packages — both during App Review and on my own development build signed into a sandbox account. Configuration (all verified): Subscription is "Ready to Submit" / "Waiting for Review" Available in all territories Paid Apps Agreement active; banking and tax complete Bundle ID and shared secret unchanged from when it worked App Review keeps rejecting under Guideline 2.1(b) ("プレミアムをはじめる" / purchase button unresponsive) because the product never loads. Questions: For a newly created IAP on a not-yet-approved app, how long does it take to become available in the sandbox? Is there a known propagation delay (24h+)? Does re-creating the product with a new Product ID reset or delay sandbox availability? Is anything required for a new product to be served in the sandbox before the app's first version is approved? Any guidance appreciated. Thanks!

I'm using Product.products(for:) to get my auto-renewable subscription on watchOS: let products = try await Product.products(for: [<##Identifier##>]) However, it doesn't return any value, and doesn't throw errors. The console shows an error: Could not parse product: missingValue(for: [StoreKit.ProductResponse.Key.billingPlanType], expected: StoreKit.BackingValue) Is this a bug or I did't configure something well? This product has been approved by App Review.

I’m trying to submit the first release of my iOS app together with the app’s first consumable in-app purchases, and I’m stuck in what looks like an App Store Connect state issue. My app was already rejected by App Review because the in-app purchases did not appear inside the app when the reviewer opened the paywall. Current setup: First app release Current app version page: iOS App Version 1.0.2 Current attached build: 5 App has never been released before 4 consumable IAPs: com.glowup.credits.100 com.glowup.credits.500 com.glowup.credits.1000 com.glowup.credits.2500 What I see in App Store Connect: All 4 IAPs show Waiting for Review On the iOS App Version 1.0.2 page, the In-App Purchases and Subscriptions section does not appear at all Because of that, I cannot explicitly select or attach the IAPs from the version page What I’ve already done: Uploaded a new build and attached build 5 to version 1.0.2 Removed my local StoreKit configuration file so the app now uses live App Store / StoreKit only Confirmed RevenueCat is configured correctly and sees the offering/packages RevenueCat logs show the products exist remotely, but StoreKit cannot fetch any live products and returns an “offerings empty / none of the products could be fetched” type error RevenueCat also reports the products are still in WAITING_FOR_REVIEW My questions: If the IAPs already show Waiting for Review, are they automatically linked to the current app submission? Is it expected that the In-App Purchases and Subscriptions section can disappear from the app version page in this state? For a first-release app that was already rejected, is attaching a new build and clicking Update Review enough, or is there another step required to associate the IAPs with the resubmission? Has anyone seen App Review reject an app for missing IAPs while the IAPs were still pending review and not yet fetchable from StoreKit? Any guidance from someone who has dealt with this exact first-release + first-IAP submission flow would help a lot.

Summary After setting a single auto-renewable subscription product (not the app) to "Developer Removed from Sale" in App Store Connect, the next scheduled renewal for an existing active subscriber failed with DID_FAIL_TO_RENEW v2 and expirationIntent = 5 ("expired for some other reason"). I expected expirationIntent = 4 ("product wasn't available for purchase at the time of renewal"), since the product was, in fact, not available for purchase. I would like to confirm whether 5 is the documented/expected value for this scenario, and how to deterministically distinguish "developer removed product from sale" from other renewal failures using the notification payload. Reproduction / observed sequence Day 15: Changed product annual_promo (auto-renewable subscription) status from "Approved" to "Developer Removed from Sale" in App Store Connect. The app itself remained Approved and on sale. Other subscription products in the same group remained Approved. Day 16: An existing active subscriber on that product had a scheduled automatic renewal date. Result: Renewal did not occur. We received a DID_FAIL_TO_RENEW v2 notification. Payload (relevant fields): JWSRenewalInfoDecodedPayload.expirationIntent = 5 JWSRenewalInfoDecodedPayload.autoRenewStatus = 0 Questions Is expirationIntent = 5 the correct/expected value when a renewal fails because the developer removed the product from sale? Or should it have been 4 ("product wasn't available for purchase at the time of renewal")? If 5 is intentional, what is the engineering rationale for not using 4 in this scenario? Given that expirationIntent = 5 is documented as a catch-all ("some other reason"), which other fields in the DID_FAIL_TO_RENEW payload (e.g., subtype, autoRenewStatus, gracePeriodExpiresDate, signedTransactionInfo) should we inspect to deterministically classify the failure cause and isolate "developer removed product from sale" from billing failure / customer cancel / price-increase not accepted / etc.? Context I'm aware of the docs page In-App Purchase statuses and Set availability for an auto-renewable subscription, but they describe the status semantics, not the resulting notification payload. Product has been reverted to "Approved" to avoid further impact on subscribers while this is clarified. Thanks in advance.

Hello, I'm developing a consumer iOS app (Capacitor + RevenueCat SDK) and I've been blocked for several weeks on a StoreKit issue: subscription products are never returned to the device, so the Apple payment sheet cannot open. I previously contacted Apple Support. I was told to request a phone call, but my call request was declined because of the topic (StoreKit / in-app purchases). I'm posting here hoping someone from Apple or the community can help. App details App name: Vytal AI Bundle ID: com.ciborgu.vytalai App Store Connect App ID: 6767160542 Team ID: JZF7CR3W8Z Distribution: TestFlight (physical iPhone, France) iOS deployment target: 15+ Subscription product IDs (auto-renewable) vytalai_premium_monthly vytalai_premium_yearly vytalai_premium_yearly_intro All three are in subscription group "Vytal AI" on the correct ASC app (not a typo bundle). Cleared for Sale is ON. Paid Apps Agreement is active. In-App Purchase capability is enabled on the App ID (checkbox is grayed out / locked, which I understand is normal). Problem On a real device via TestFlight: RevenueCat SDK configures successfully (public iOS API key present in build). Purchases.getProducts({ productIdentifiers: [...] }) returns { products: [] } — zero products. Because StoreKit returns an empty array, the Sandbox payment sheet never appears when the user taps Subscribe. This is NOT a UI issue — the native SDK call to Apple returns no products. What I've already verified Bundle ID in signed IPA matches ASC app: com.ciborgu.vytalai Subscriptions exist only on the correct app (not on an old typo bundle com.ciborgue.vytalai) Removed duplicate ASC app; old App ID cannot be deleted ("in use by App Store") but has no IAPs Regenerated EAS provisioning profile for com.ciborgu.vytalai Sandbox tester account configured on device (Settings → App Store → Sandbox Account) Tested without VPN / iCloud Private Relay Reinstalled app from TestFlight after ASC changes Waited for propagation after metadata / availability updates Associated Domains enabled (for deep links) — separate from IAP SDK / integration @revenuecat/purchases-capacitor 13.x Direct StoreKit fetch via Purchases.getProducts() (not only RevenueCat offerings) Same result: 0 products from Apple Expected vs actual Expected: StoreKit returns 3 subscription products in Sandbox; payment sheet opens on purchase. Actual: products array is always empty; no payment sheet. Questions Why would StoreKit return 0 products for valid auto-renewable subscriptions on TestFlight when metadata is "Waiting for Review" / in review — shouldn't Sandbox still return products per TN3186? Is there an ASC configuration state (availability, subscription group localization, missing review screenshot on yearly products, etc.) that causes StoreKit to return zero products even in Sandbox? Is there an internal flag or propagation delay on Apple's side I should ask to be reset for this app/bundle? I'm happy to provide additional logs, a sysdiagnose, or a short screen recording from TestFlight showing the empty product response. Thank you for any guidance — this is blocking App Review (Guideline 2.1) and I cannot test IAP at all. Nathan

Hello, I'm developing a Capacitor/Next.js iOS app with RevenueCat for auto-renewable subscriptions. On a real iPhone via TestFlight, StoreKit never returns my subscription products, so the Apple payment sheet never appears. App TestFlight builds tested: 110, 111, 112 (iOS 1.1.0) In-App Purchase capability enabled on App ID Paid Applications Agreement: active Banking/tax: active Subscription product IDs (auto-renewable, same subscription group) vytalai_premium_monthly vytalai_premium_yearly vytalai_premium_yearly_intro (exit offer) What happens Install app from TestFlight on physical iPhone Navigate to paywall App calls RevenueCat → Purchases.getProducts() with the 3 product IDs above StoreKit returns 0 products (or configure/getProducts times out) UI shows: "Apple Store: 0 subscriptions on this device — Sandbox popup cannot open" Tapping subscribe does not open the Apple payment sheet Fallback prices appear (3.49 / 29.99) instead of live App Store prices (3,49 € / 29,99 €), which suggests StoreKit is not returning products. What we already verified Correct bundle ID in build metadata NEXT_PUBLIC_REVENUECAT_API_KEY_IOS (appl_*) embedded in EAS production build Provisioning profile regenerated and active Subscription metadata corrected (was Rejected, now Waiting for Review) All 3 subscriptions attached to app version submission RevenueCat offering "default" with monthly, annual, and annual_intro packages App Store Server Notifications URL configured to RevenueCat Legal pages open in-app (no external cookie banner on native) Testing on TestFlight only (not Safari/web) App Review context We received Guideline 2.1(b) rejections because: Error on purchase page Exit offer (50% OFF / €1.91 per month equivalent) referenced product vytalai_premium_yearly_intro which was not submitted for review initially — now added and submitted with the app version. Question Even with subscriptions in "Waiting for Review" state and metadata completed, should StoreKit Sandbox/TestFlight return these products on device so we can test the payment sheet before approval? If not, what exact App Store Connect state is required for StoreKit to return products on TestFlight? Any guidance on why getProducts would return 0 for valid product IDs on a TestFlight build would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.

StoreKit getProducts returns 0 subscriptions on TestFlight for product IDs vytalai_premium_monthly, vytalai_premium_yearly, vytalai_premium_yearly_intro (bundle com.ciborgu.vytalai, build 112+). All metadata submitted, Paid Apps Agreement active. Please check why Sandbox catalog is empty for this app.