《App Store Review Guidelines》 5.1.1 Data Collection and Storage(iv)SafariViewContoller must be used to visibly present information to users; the controller may not be hidden or obscured by other views or layers. Additionally,an app may not use SafariViewController to track users without their knowledge and consent.As above,does it mean that privacy policy pages have to be displayed using SFSafariViewContoller?Can I use WKWebView to display the privacy policy pages in my app?
Search results for
5.1.1
400 results found
Selecting any option will automatically load the page
Post
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
I submitted the very first version of my app two weeks ago and it was accepted with no problems within 24 hours. Fast forward a week later, I submit for an app update review with basically little to no changes, and its rejected for the following reasons:Guidelines 2.3.7 - Performance - Accurate Metadata We noticed that your app name or subtitle to be displayed on the App Store includes the following trademarked term or popular app name, which is not appropriate for use in these metadata items. Specifically, your app name or subtitle included the term, Fortnite.First of all, why wasn't this a problem when I submitted a week ago? So I end up changing the app name the the subtitle and then resubmit for review EXACTLY as they requested me to do so. After waiting 5 days for them to re-review it, I get another rejection because of the following reasons:Guideline 3.2.2 - Business - Other Business Model Issues - Unacceptable The NEWS FEED feature in your app displays or promotes third-party apps, which is not appropr
When your app asks for permission to use CLLocation it will indicate you are asking for permission even while the app is in the background. You will need to give a reason for that in the info.plist. There are various guidelines (5.1.1 (ii)) on the appropriate use of data.
Topic:
App Store Distribution & Marketing
SubTopic:
App Review
Tags:
When i upload builds to app store they given the feedback as We noticed that your app requests the user’s consent to access their camera, microphone, and location but does not clarify the use of this feature in the permission modal alert, But i haven't request any permissions to use user's content in my application. Actually i don't need it, so how can i prevent my application to request the user's consent to access their features?
Hello Claude,This is the mesage I got:Guideline 5.1.1 - Legal - Privacy - Data Collection and StorageWe noticed that your app requires users to register with personal information that is not directly relevant to your app’s core functionality.Specifically, gender is not an optional field in your app’s registration.Do you think if we do the things mentioned above, our binary will be accepted?
Topic:
App Store Distribution & Marketing
SubTopic:
App Review
Tags:
See the ASRGs 5.1.1 (ii) Data Collection and Storage
Topic:
App Store Distribution & Marketing
SubTopic:
App Review
Tags:
See 5.1.1 Data Collection and Storage in the ASRGs.No one here can promise what App Review will/won't approve/reject otherwise.
Topic:
App Store Distribution & Marketing
SubTopic:
App Review
Tags:
Did some greping and finding.~/Library/Developer/Xcode/iOS DeviceSupport/[build #]/Symbols/Developer/Applications/ for build versions ranging from 5.1.1 to 7.1.2 contain the MobileReplayer.app.I can see in the device logs where my app was deployed, but I have no record of this app being pushed. Curioser.
Topic:
Developer Tools & Services
SubTopic:
Developer Forums
Tags:
We submitted an update for our app about 1.5 weeks back. This is our fifth update and never had this issue. We developed a dating app and we required that users fill out their profile because we do not want half incomplete profiles due to UX. However, if a user does not want to share information about themselves they have the option to chose other. The only field that is required is height because it’s an integer. Accord to the guidelines I can only require information if it’s a core functionality. We know it’s our core functionality because of the profiles are half empty not only does it ruin the UX but also will start messing up our alogorithm. Not only that, I downloaded other dating apps and they require users to fill out their profiles or they do not let them forward. I even sent them the video of other apps to show it’s a common practice and also information why we require information as a part of our core functionality but we keep getting rejected. We definitely would love some insight.
>Is this allowed by the developer guidelines?If you mean ASRG's 5.1.1 (ii), you may need to talk in more detail about your app, thanks.
Topic:
App Store Distribution & Marketing
SubTopic:
App Review
Tags:
Hi guys,In order to use CloudKit methods like fetchUserRecordID the end user has to enable Look Me Up feature. But recently Apple App review board told us that asking the user to enable Look Me Up does not comply with the App Store Review Guidelines. 5.1.1, below.What is App Store compliant way to use CloudKit?Legal - 5.1.1The app requires users to enable Look Me Up access in iCloud in order to access non account-based features. Apps cannot require personal information prior to allowing access to app content and features that are not associated specifically to the user.Thanks
Why - see the ASRGs 3.2.2 Unacceptable ; 5.1.1 Data Collection and StorageI think Apples hopes you submit an app that showcases the platform, offering unique, lasting benefit to users...there is no store-centric distribution scheme for limited, one-off event support. >What workaround options can we have to make this a private/invitation only appHow about no app at all - a modern HTML5 website would provide both iOS and Android support out of the box, with no need to run any app store gauntlet.
Topic:
App Store Distribution & Marketing
SubTopic:
App Review
Tags:
Did clean no difference.Changed build settings for signing to state Don't Code Sign as this app is not going to be delivered via apple web site.Still get code signing error stating required in SDK 5.1I cant seem to get round this problem.It looks like Ive got to look for another development tool that can build and deliver to 5.1.1
Topic:
Developer Tools & Services
SubTopic:
Xcode
Tags:
The old iPads have to be running iOS 5.1.1 or later, as only those iOS versions include support for apps containing 64-bit slices. And Apple now requires submitted apps to include 64-bit support. Apps built with earlier versions of Xcode run just fine on iOS 11 devices as long as they include 64-bit support (an arm64 slice). IIRC, Xcode 5.1 or 6.x can build apps compatible with both iOS 5.1.1 and 64-bit iOS 11 devices. You can have multiple versions of Xcode installed on your Mac (or you may need to use an older Mac running a older release of OS X), and use the newer releases of Xcode to install test apps built with older releases on newer devices.
Topic:
App Store Distribution & Marketing
SubTopic:
General
Tags:
I understand that Apple may not accept this into the store for general distribution but I would at least like to deliver the app to the iPad which is the original build and cannot run any iOS later than 5.1.1. Does Xcode generate an App package that I can manually copy and install to the iPad?
Topic:
Developer Tools & Services
SubTopic:
Xcode
Tags: