“translate scheme”

Hello Quinn,many thanks for the information about using the IP_BOUND_IF.In our application software we have the same issue for the UDP broadcast as described by prashant_telangi We use an UDP broadcast message to a dedicated IP port to detect a specific device type in the network. This was working so far from MacOS 10.5 up to MacOS 10.10. With MacOS 10.11 it does no longer work.To analyze the issue I have created a small test program which I compile on MacOS 10.10 and run it on MacOS 10.11I start the test program with./testUdpBroadcast 10.0.0.88 255.255.255.255then the setsockopt for IP_BOUND_IF will not be used and if I start the test program with./testUdpBroadcast 10.0.0.88 255.255.255.255 en2then the setsockopt for IP_BOUND_IF will be used.For MacOS 10.10 both variants result in an UDP broadcast message being sent.For MacOS 10.11 both variants result in an error message sendto() failed: No route to host/* * Test program to test the UDP broadcast on MacOS 10.11. * build: * gcc -Wall testUdpBroadcast.c -o te

@Everyone,I'm seeing this problem on Xcode Version 7.0.1 (7A1001) with ios 9.0.2 (iphone 6plus) and 38mm watch Version 2.0 (13S344).I upgraded my devices this am and repaired the iphone and watch. I then tried to debug using my watch scheme. It workedonce and then consistently failed. Each time, the watchkitextension took a long time to connect and displayed a running message in Xcode window. However, the watch displayed spinning circles and never responded.Does anyone know if radars filed were fixed?

Have you actually tried that URL scheme on the most recent versions of iOS, or are you dealing with second hand documentation?

For our Jenkins build, we've been resetting the entire simulator between runs.export DEV_NAME=UITest5s xcrun simctl list devices | grep $DEV_NAME | awk '{print $1}' | xargs xcrun simctl delete xcrun simctl create $DEV_NAME 'iPhone 5s' '9.0' xcrun simctl erase $DEV_NAME xcodebuild -workspace your.xcworkspace -scheme UITests -sdk iphonesimulator9.0 -destination name=UITest5s testWe're still in the process of stress testing our Jenkins build, but with a single non-trivial UI test, we've gone through a hundred runs with 2 failures due to what look like some kind of build failure.

If you want to control accessories which are not HomeKit compatible, you need a HomeKit bridge which translates commands from the HomeKit Accessory Protocol (HAP) to the RS232 protocol.

Is 'other drive' your current boot drive or not?What happens if you abandon the MAS install scheme and manually download via https://developer.apple.com/downloads/...then mount that image and drag Xcode to your choice of location?

The signatures should be considered to match, resulting in an invalid redeclaration.I don't think people realistically need both variants. Do you?I do think that we should be able to translate between tuples and not-tuples willy-nilly, in order to reuse common parameter lists with no friction. This is one of the ways that tuples have stopped me from having to create too many structs.If I could define the typealiases in my protocols, and not have to copy-paste it across my implementors instead, and then use the copy-pasted signature in the protocol itself, that would be pleasant.

>I've now installed the (registered developer) release version of XCode 7.0.1 over the prior betasNot sure what that means. The betas are normally installed with a different naming scheme. Release versions normally install over themselves.Or have you been juggling names for both? If so, that may have something to do w/the current IDE state/issues.

I'm not a Core Location expert but it is my understanding that your app receives the Location option under its Settings entry because it has, at some point, called one of the location APIs. This was added in iOS 8 - previously the location settings for all apps could only be configured from the Privacy settings.We know about that, but we want to open general settings instead of apllication settings.I'm afraid that there is not a documented URL scheme to do that. You should describe your use case in an enhancement request so that such a URL scheme can be considered for inclusion in a future version of the iOS SDK.

The Build command builds all the targets in the currently selected scheme. It will also build all actions (Analyze/Test/Run/Profile/Archive) whose checkmarks are selected (see the Build item in the left column of the Edit Scheme dialog). Note the checkbox at top Parallelize Build, this allows Xcode to build your project much faser since it can build more than one action at a time. After making a major change and building, later builds may be faster and some parts won't need to be re-built.The Build For option can be used if a parallell build would take a lot of time and you just want to do a partial build to, for example, do an Analyze.

Objective-C has naming conventions that are used in a lot of cases with by-reference parameters (getFoo:, fooAndReturnBar:, etc.), so I'd expect a lot of them to translate fairly naturally (C APIs, of course, don't name anything at all, so they're going to be equally unclear before and after). If there are cases that end up reading badly, I suppose we could do something like extend the out keyword with a parameter that allows it to be given a different name in Swift, like so:- (NSString *)foo:(out(bar) NSString **)bar; to: func foo() -> (String, bar: String)We should see what kinds of badly-reading constructions we can find in the Cocoa API first, though, before deciding whether additions like this are necessary. Do you have any examples?