Search results for

“4.3”

625 results found

Post

Replies

Boosts

Views

Activity

Request Authorization at Launch Time not triggering request authorisation popup
Since a recent upgrade - Xcode 9.4, WatchOS 4.3, iOS 11.4, the Request Authorization at Launch Time in my watchApp is no longer generating the request authorization pop-up on the phone.My requests are appearing as if the user had provided authorization.Yes, I have uninstalled the app and rebooted all devices many times to see if there was something left hanging around.In itself, that's not a problem, as I want my users to accept Notifications, they are intrinsic to my app, but the problem is that the Simulator is not requesting authorization and denying it incenter.requestAuthorization(options: [.alert, .sound]) { (granted, error) in print(granted: (granted), error: (error!)) } }
2
0
1.2k
Jun ’18
About Guideline 4.2.6
In Guideline 4.2.6.Apps created from a commercialized template or app generation service will be rejected unless they are submitted directly by the provider of the app’s content. These services should not submit apps on behalf of their clients and should offer tools that let their clients create customized, innovative apps that provide unique customer experiences.This Guideline is very similar to Guideline 4.3.How to comply with Guideline 4.2.6 without violating Guideline 4.3?Is it possible to just use the tool to create an similar app and submit it using the client's developer account?Is there an impact if the customer's developer account is an individual developer account and not an enterprise developer account?
0
0
1k
Jun ’18
No crypto user for encrypted APFS volume!
After an update to High Sierra, I'm trying to unlock my volume (disk1s1) but cannot anymore. This is the info from terminal:APFS Container (1 found) | +-- Container disk1 C8022E32-744D-414E-9246-29ADDB0357F3 ==================================================== APFS Container Reference: disk1 Size (Capacity Ceiling): 500068036608 B (500.1 GB) Minimum Size: 500068036608 B (500.1 GB) Capacity In Use By Volumes: 485282820096 B (485.3 GB) (97.0% used) Capacity Not Allocated: 14785216512 B (14.8 GB) (3.0% free) | +-< Physical Store disk0s2 438AD64B-835E-418D-B0DF-32A3A0B7500A | ----------------------------------------------------------- | APFS Physical Store Disk: disk0s2 | Size: 500068036608 B (500.1 GB) | +-> Volume disk1s1 6C587DE6-9C8D-3792-9144-34FBE59AE9F6 | --------------------------------------------------- | APFS Volume Disk (Role): disk1s1 (No specific role) | Name: Macintosh HD (Case-insensitive) | Mount Point: Not Mounted | Capacity Consumed: 382597644288 B (382.6 GB) | FileVault: Yes (Locked) | +
1
0
8.9k
Jun ’18
Reply to Rejected - Guideline 4.2 - Minimal functionality
You've seen it and App Review has seen it, so we're left to our imagination what they witnessed that prompted your exact rejection, but I'd speculate that a tilt-puzzle is hardly original/unique these days. MazeTilt, HydroTilt, Tilt-to-Live, FallDown, Tilt Tilt Ladybug, Block tilt Escape, Gate Tilt, tilt The Box, Time Tilt Ball....on and on, the store seems well saturated, since at least 2010. Maybe they've just had enough...surprised they didn't just flag it w/4.3.
Jun ’18
Reply to Guideline 4.3 -- made from template... but they are not.
Here is the list of our apps that got Guideline 4.3 rejection so far...• https://itunes.apple.com/app/id926102392?ls=1&mt=8 (approved after one month)• https://itunes.apple.com/app/id1272669652?ls=1&mt=8 (approved after giving up the obsolete version and IP commentary book reader (id1217317638))• https://itunes.apple.com/app/id978926628?ls=1&mt=8 (no new update is allowed)• https://itunes.apple.com/app/id325361059?ls=1&mt=8 (no new update is allowed)• https://itunes.apple.com/app/id560440657?ls=1&mt=8 (approved after several phone calls)• https://itunes.apple.com/app/id1020070997?ls=1&mt=8 (no new update is allowed)• https://itunes.apple.com/app/id1217317638?ls=1&mt=8 (no new update is allowed)• https://app-liv.jp/320090110/(told to remove on the phone because it violates Guideline 4.3)
May ’18
Guideline 4.3 - Design wrong rejections
Earlier I had about 20 similar travel apps. All of them received a rejection for the reason of Guideline 4.3 - Design Spam. Later, according to Apple recommendations, I have combined all similar apps into the one container app.Now, when I try to publish any new apps or updates I get the same rejection (Guideline 4.3 - Design). It looks like an automatic rejection for everything that I try to upload. I have to constantly ask for a re-check. After the moderator team re-checks the app, the app is passed successfully without any rejection.Last time I tried to publish stickers app. This app is based on a Sticker Pack App template in Xcode and has unique and exclusive stickers for iMessage. And this app gets the same rejection. I'm sure that after my request this stickers app will pass successfully. But I do not understand why I have to ask for a re-check every time.New apps and updates still get wrong rejection after I fixed everything that Apple requested (combined all similar apps into the one
8
0
4.9k
May ’18
Reply to Guideline 4.3 -- made from template... but they are not.
If you are talking about FastFinga 3, I already got approved from Hasegawa san from Apple Review Board. He clearly said that Handwriting Keyboard is not similar to FastFinga 3 because Handwriting Keyboard is a keyboard extension, although he ordered me to remove FastFinga version 2 because keeping multiple versions is against Guideline 4.3 and not allowed on App Store.Even he said that I still doubt Handwriting Keyboard was rejected because of FastFinga 3. I think the review team is very confused and not operating well. FastFinga is more like a drawing app. Handwriting Keyboard is a keyboard extension, which contains handwriting recognition engine. It is like Apple's built-in Simplified Chinese Handwriting Keyboard.
May ’18
Reply to Guideline 4.3 -- made from template... but they are not.
I got another Guideline 4.3 rejeciton today.This time it is a keyboard extension that enables Japanese and English handwriting (handwriting recogniton) system wide.View on App StoreI immediately appealed to the review board, but even the appeal was rejected just in an hour. They said they gave us all the reasons (yes, made from a template as usual) and my request for detailed explanation was denied.-----We got a phone call on June 6. Finally they decided that the app is unique enough to be appoved. It took several weeks to get attention from the review board this time again. The resolution centre was purly waste of time. It did not resolve anything.
May ’18
Reply to 4.3 Design Guidelines - Apple please reconsider how this is enforced.
I have loyal users of many years. Not many, but they have supported Apple's products for many years.Apple just keep on damaging user experience by rejecting the updates because of guideline 4.3.I have to explain to users that I can't update our productivity apps because Apple just don't allow updates even though the updates are ready to be released only if Apple allow to do so.The apps are keeps on crashing on users' phone and users are unable to access their data accumulated on their phone for several years. I don't understand why Apple keep on damaging tthier reputation by donig this.I am not being harrassed by Apple, but users are.
May ’18
Reply to DisplayLink not working in MacOs 10.13.4 bata update
DisplayLink is aware of this ploblemhere is official statemant:http://www.displaylink.com/downloads/macosImportant Information about macOS 10.13.4 updateWe have become aware that installing macOS release Version 10.13.4 will cause DisplayLink connected displays to go blank after the OS upgrade, with the current DisplayLink driver [4.1] installed. Functionality such as Ethernet and audio, where implemented, is unaffected. We have alerted Apple to this issue and are working hard to find a resolution. These features continue to work as expected in 10.13.3.In the meantime, we have a new driver [4.3] that will enable clone mode, but not mirror or extended mode displays in 10.13.4. If you require mirror or extended mode displays, we recommend that you stay on macOS 10.13.3 or earlier at this time.
Topic: App & System Services SubTopic: Core OS Tags:
May ’18
How this dev is able to get his same apps approved?
I have been searching for newly released apps and came across following account:https://itunes.apple.com/us/developer/free-las-vegas-casino-card-games/id1038615411?mt=8Appannie link:https://www.appannie.com/apps/ios/publisher/1038615411/Every 3 days a new apps is being published.While the app title limit is 30 charcters but his newest releases have 50 characters in app names in English which is very surprising as the web page on itunesconnect never allows to save if app title > 30 charsTotal 128 apps live till nowAll apps are same. Not even similar but same.All apps have same descriptionUnrelated words in app title and some questionable keywords too like casino, HuuugeSame screenshots with just minor modificationsSame app size.15th April app released: https://itunes.apple.com/app/id11748533741st May app releases: https://itunes.apple.com/app/id1174853378Both above apps have size of 35.8MB and same screenshots and description of app. Only minor difference in the app icon. Like these, there are so many pairs
0
0
626
May ’18
Reply to 4.3 Design Guidelines - Apple please reconsider how this is enforced.
We did this as well. We removed all but one app in our series, submitted it and it was rejected for 4.3.In our case, we had initially consolidated our series into a container. We removed everything but the container and sold it for one month. The sales as expected were horrible because the marketing suffers terribly and the app icon is super-generic. We've been selling for years and know roughly what to expect for any given week in the app store. The container sold far worse than our series of apps individually. The sales of the container were also worse than our top selling app by itself. So, we decided to discontinue the container and sell only our top seller. This where we are now -- rejected for 4.3 design spam with no other apps like it in the store.We've only received the 4.3 templated response in the resolution center. Last week we had call with the App Store. We had the impression from the call that this course of action was OK (though they wouldn't say definitively), so we
Apr ’18
Request Authorization at Launch Time not triggering request authorisation popup
Since a recent upgrade - Xcode 9.4, WatchOS 4.3, iOS 11.4, the Request Authorization at Launch Time in my watchApp is no longer generating the request authorization pop-up on the phone.My requests are appearing as if the user had provided authorization.Yes, I have uninstalled the app and rebooted all devices many times to see if there was something left hanging around.In itself, that's not a problem, as I want my users to accept Notifications, they are intrinsic to my app, but the problem is that the Simulator is not requesting authorization and denying it incenter.requestAuthorization(options: [.alert, .sound]) { (granted, error) in print(granted: (granted), error: (error!)) } }
Replies
2
Boosts
0
Views
1.2k
Activity
Jun ’18
About Guideline 4.2.6
In Guideline 4.2.6.Apps created from a commercialized template or app generation service will be rejected unless they are submitted directly by the provider of the app’s content. These services should not submit apps on behalf of their clients and should offer tools that let their clients create customized, innovative apps that provide unique customer experiences.This Guideline is very similar to Guideline 4.3.How to comply with Guideline 4.2.6 without violating Guideline 4.3?Is it possible to just use the tool to create an similar app and submit it using the client's developer account?Is there an impact if the customer's developer account is an individual developer account and not an enterprise developer account?
Replies
0
Boosts
0
Views
1k
Activity
Jun ’18
No crypto user for encrypted APFS volume!
After an update to High Sierra, I'm trying to unlock my volume (disk1s1) but cannot anymore. This is the info from terminal:APFS Container (1 found) | +-- Container disk1 C8022E32-744D-414E-9246-29ADDB0357F3 ==================================================== APFS Container Reference: disk1 Size (Capacity Ceiling): 500068036608 B (500.1 GB) Minimum Size: 500068036608 B (500.1 GB) Capacity In Use By Volumes: 485282820096 B (485.3 GB) (97.0% used) Capacity Not Allocated: 14785216512 B (14.8 GB) (3.0% free) | +-< Physical Store disk0s2 438AD64B-835E-418D-B0DF-32A3A0B7500A | ----------------------------------------------------------- | APFS Physical Store Disk: disk0s2 | Size: 500068036608 B (500.1 GB) | +-> Volume disk1s1 6C587DE6-9C8D-3792-9144-34FBE59AE9F6 | --------------------------------------------------- | APFS Volume Disk (Role): disk1s1 (No specific role) | Name: Macintosh HD (Case-insensitive) | Mount Point: Not Mounted | Capacity Consumed: 382597644288 B (382.6 GB) | FileVault: Yes (Locked) | +
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
8.9k
Activity
Jun ’18
Reply to Rejected - Guideline 4.2 - Minimal functionality
You've seen it and App Review has seen it, so we're left to our imagination what they witnessed that prompted your exact rejection, but I'd speculate that a tilt-puzzle is hardly original/unique these days. MazeTilt, HydroTilt, Tilt-to-Live, FallDown, Tilt Tilt Ladybug, Block tilt Escape, Gate Tilt, tilt The Box, Time Tilt Ball....on and on, the store seems well saturated, since at least 2010. Maybe they've just had enough...surprised they didn't just flag it w/4.3.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Jun ’18
Reply to Guideline 4.3 -- made from template... but they are not.
Here is the list of our apps that got Guideline 4.3 rejection so far...• https://itunes.apple.com/app/id926102392?ls=1&mt=8 (approved after one month)• https://itunes.apple.com/app/id1272669652?ls=1&mt=8 (approved after giving up the obsolete version and IP commentary book reader (id1217317638))• https://itunes.apple.com/app/id978926628?ls=1&mt=8 (no new update is allowed)• https://itunes.apple.com/app/id325361059?ls=1&mt=8 (no new update is allowed)• https://itunes.apple.com/app/id560440657?ls=1&mt=8 (approved after several phone calls)• https://itunes.apple.com/app/id1020070997?ls=1&mt=8 (no new update is allowed)• https://itunes.apple.com/app/id1217317638?ls=1&mt=8 (no new update is allowed)• https://app-liv.jp/320090110/(told to remove on the phone because it violates Guideline 4.3)
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
May ’18
Reply to WatchOS public beta,
Yes I also have the Betas Profile installed, and after installing a few weeks ago it updated after installing the profile, but nothing since then. Under about my watch has version 4.3 (15T212) is that the latest.
Topic: App & System Services SubTopic: Core OS Tags:
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
May ’18
Guideline 4.3 - Design wrong rejections
Earlier I had about 20 similar travel apps. All of them received a rejection for the reason of Guideline 4.3 - Design Spam. Later, according to Apple recommendations, I have combined all similar apps into the one container app.Now, when I try to publish any new apps or updates I get the same rejection (Guideline 4.3 - Design). It looks like an automatic rejection for everything that I try to upload. I have to constantly ask for a re-check. After the moderator team re-checks the app, the app is passed successfully without any rejection.Last time I tried to publish stickers app. This app is based on a Sticker Pack App template in Xcode and has unique and exclusive stickers for iMessage. And this app gets the same rejection. I'm sure that after my request this stickers app will pass successfully. But I do not understand why I have to ask for a re-check every time.New apps and updates still get wrong rejection after I fixed everything that Apple requested (combined all similar apps into the one
Replies
8
Boosts
0
Views
4.9k
Activity
May ’18
Reply to Guideline 4.3 -- made from template... but they are not.
If you are talking about FastFinga 3, I already got approved from Hasegawa san from Apple Review Board. He clearly said that Handwriting Keyboard is not similar to FastFinga 3 because Handwriting Keyboard is a keyboard extension, although he ordered me to remove FastFinga version 2 because keeping multiple versions is against Guideline 4.3 and not allowed on App Store.Even he said that I still doubt Handwriting Keyboard was rejected because of FastFinga 3. I think the review team is very confused and not operating well. FastFinga is more like a drawing app. Handwriting Keyboard is a keyboard extension, which contains handwriting recognition engine. It is like Apple's built-in Simplified Chinese Handwriting Keyboard.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
May ’18
Reply to Guideline 4.3 -- made from template... but they are not.
I got another Guideline 4.3 rejeciton today.This time it is a keyboard extension that enables Japanese and English handwriting (handwriting recogniton) system wide.View on App StoreI immediately appealed to the review board, but even the appeal was rejected just in an hour. They said they gave us all the reasons (yes, made from a template as usual) and my request for detailed explanation was denied.-----We got a phone call on June 6. Finally they decided that the app is unique enough to be appoved. It took several weeks to get attention from the review board this time again. The resolution centre was purly waste of time. It did not resolve anything.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
May ’18
Reply to 4.3 Design Guidelines - Apple please reconsider how this is enforced.
Those of us without an AppAnnie account couldn't see the link. Maybe the release dates are updates? He might be trying to consolidate apps and got a reprieve from the 4.3 requirements for updates
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
May ’18
Reply to 4.3 Design Guidelines - Apple please reconsider how this is enforced.
I have loyal users of many years. Not many, but they have supported Apple's products for many years.Apple just keep on damaging user experience by rejecting the updates because of guideline 4.3.I have to explain to users that I can't update our productivity apps because Apple just don't allow updates even though the updates are ready to be released only if Apple allow to do so.The apps are keeps on crashing on users' phone and users are unable to access their data accumulated on their phone for several years. I don't understand why Apple keep on damaging tthier reputation by donig this.I am not being harrassed by Apple, but users are.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
May ’18
Reply to 4.3 Design Guidelines - Apple please reconsider how this is enforced.
that is why I had given Appannie link where we can see the release date of the app. Even though copyright is 2017 but release date is this month and its same app so many times. 4.3 is being torn apart by this guy but how?http://prntscr.com/jemzzd
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
May ’18
Reply to DisplayLink not working in MacOs 10.13.4 bata update
DisplayLink is aware of this ploblemhere is official statemant:http://www.displaylink.com/downloads/macosImportant Information about macOS 10.13.4 updateWe have become aware that installing macOS release Version 10.13.4 will cause DisplayLink connected displays to go blank after the OS upgrade, with the current DisplayLink driver [4.1] installed. Functionality such as Ethernet and audio, where implemented, is unaffected. We have alerted Apple to this issue and are working hard to find a resolution. These features continue to work as expected in 10.13.3.In the meantime, we have a new driver [4.3] that will enable clone mode, but not mirror or extended mode displays in 10.13.4. If you require mirror or extended mode displays, we recommend that you stay on macOS 10.13.3 or earlier at this time.
Topic: App & System Services SubTopic: Core OS Tags:
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
May ’18
How this dev is able to get his same apps approved?
I have been searching for newly released apps and came across following account:https://itunes.apple.com/us/developer/free-las-vegas-casino-card-games/id1038615411?mt=8Appannie link:https://www.appannie.com/apps/ios/publisher/1038615411/Every 3 days a new apps is being published.While the app title limit is 30 charcters but his newest releases have 50 characters in app names in English which is very surprising as the web page on itunesconnect never allows to save if app title > 30 charsTotal 128 apps live till nowAll apps are same. Not even similar but same.All apps have same descriptionUnrelated words in app title and some questionable keywords too like casino, HuuugeSame screenshots with just minor modificationsSame app size.15th April app released: https://itunes.apple.com/app/id11748533741st May app releases: https://itunes.apple.com/app/id1174853378Both above apps have size of 35.8MB and same screenshots and description of app. Only minor difference in the app icon. Like these, there are so many pairs
Replies
0
Boosts
0
Views
626
Activity
May ’18
Reply to 4.3 Design Guidelines - Apple please reconsider how this is enforced.
We did this as well. We removed all but one app in our series, submitted it and it was rejected for 4.3.In our case, we had initially consolidated our series into a container. We removed everything but the container and sold it for one month. The sales as expected were horrible because the marketing suffers terribly and the app icon is super-generic. We've been selling for years and know roughly what to expect for any given week in the app store. The container sold far worse than our series of apps individually. The sales of the container were also worse than our top selling app by itself. So, we decided to discontinue the container and sell only our top seller. This where we are now -- rejected for 4.3 design spam with no other apps like it in the store.We've only received the 4.3 templated response in the resolution center. Last week we had call with the App Store. We had the impression from the call that this course of action was OK (though they wouldn't say definitively), so we
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Apr ’18