Hello, I hope you're all doing well! I'm currently working on integrating new iOS 26 features into my app, and so far, the process has been really exciting. However, I've encountered an issue when updating the badge of a UIBarButtonItem, and I’m hoping to get some insights or suggestions. The app has two UIViewController instances in the navigation stack, each containing a UIBarButtonItem. On the first controller, the badge is set to 1, and on the second, the badge is set to 2. In the second controller, there is a "Reset" button that sets the badge of the second controller to nil. However, when I tap the "Reset" button, instead of setting the badge to nil, it sets the value to 1. I would appreciate any ideas or suggestions on how to solve this problem. Maybe I am using the badge API incorrectly. Thank you! class ViewController: UIViewController { var cartButtonItem: UIBarButtonItem! override func viewDidLoad() { super.viewDidLoad() configureNavigationItem() } func configureNavigationItem() { cartButtonItem = UIBarButtonItem(image: UIImage(resource: .cartNavBar), style: .plain, target: self, action: #selector(showCartTab)) cartButtonItem.tintColor = UIColor.systemBlue cartButtonItem.badge = .count(1) navigationItem.rightBarButtonItem = cartButtonItem } @objc func showCartTab() { // Add second view controller in navigation stack performSegue(withIdentifier: "Cart", sender: nil) } } class CartViewController: UIViewController { var cartButtonItem: UIBarButtonItem! override func viewDidLoad() { super.viewDidLoad() configureNavigationItem() } func configureNavigationItem() { cartButtonItem = UIBarButtonItem(image: UIImage(resource: .cartNavBar), style: .plain, target: nil, action: nil) cartButtonItem.tintColor = UIColor.systemBlue cartButtonItem.badge = .count(2) navigationItem.rightBarButtonItem = cartButtonItem } func updateBadge() { cartButtonItem.badge = nil } @IBAction func resetButtonPressed(_ sender: Any) { updateBadge() } }

I’m trying to understand the exact role of the return value in the UITextFieldDelegate method textFieldShouldReturn(_:). From my experiments in Xcode, I observed: Returning true vs false does not seem to cause any visible difference (e.g., the keyboard does not automatically dismiss either way). I know that in shouldChangeCharactersIn returning true allows the system to insert the character, and returning false prevents it. That’s clear. For textFieldShouldReturn, my current understanding is that returning true means “let the OS handle the Return press,” and returning false means “I’ll handle it myself.” My confusion: what is it that the OS actually does when it “handles” the Return press? Does UIKit do anything beyond calling this delegate method? If the system is supposed to dismiss the keyboard when returning true, why doesn’t it happen automatically? I’d appreciate clarification on the expected use of this return value — specifically, what default behavior the system performs (if any) when we return true. Thanks!

On testing my app with tvOS 18, I have noticed the Siri Remote back button no longer provides system-provided behavior when interacting with tab bar controller pages. Instead of moving focus back to the tab bar when pressed, the back button will close the app, as if the Home button was pressed. This occurs both on device and in the Simulator. Create tvOS project with a tab bar controller. Create pages/tabs which contain focusable items (ie. buttons) Scroll down to any focusable item (ie. a button or UICollectionView cell) Hit the Siri Remote back button. See expect behavior below: Expected behavior: System-provided behavior should move focus back to the tab bar at the top of the screen. Actual results: App is closed and user is taken back to the Home Screen. Has anyone else noticed this behavior?

Note: in this post I discuss sceneDidEnterBackground/WillResignActive but I assume any guidance provided would also apply to the now deprecated applicationDidEnterBackground/applicationWillResignActive and SwiftUI's ScenePhase (please call out if that's not the case!). A common pattern for applications with sensitive user data (banking, health, private journals, etc.) is to obsurce content in the app switcher. Different apps appear to implement this in two common patterns. Either immediately upon becoming inactive (near immediately upon moving to task switcher) or only upon becoming backgrounded (not until you've gone to another app or back to the home screen). I’d like to make sure we’re aligned with Apple’s intended best practices and am wondering if an anti-pattern of using sceneWillResignActive(_:) may be becoming popularized and has minor user experience inconviences (jarring transitions to the App Switcher/Control Center/Notification Center and when the system presents alerts.) Our applications current implementation uses sceneDidEnterBackground(_:) to obscure sensitive elements instead of sceneWillResignActive(_:), based on the recomendations from tech note QA1838 and the documentation in sceneDidEnterBackground(_:) ... Shortly after this method [sceneWillEnterBackground] returns, UIKit takes a snapshot of your scene’s interface for display in the app switcher. Make sure your interface doesn’t contain sensitive user information. Both QA1838 and the sceneDidEnterBackground documentation seem to indicate backgrounding is the appropriate event to respond to for this pattern but I am wondering if "to display in the app switcher" may be causing confusion since your app can also display in the app switcher upon becoming inactive and if some guidance could be added to sceneWillResignActive that it is not nesscary to obsure content during this state (if that is true). In our testing, apps seems to continue to play any in-progress animations when entering the app switcher from the application (inactive state), suggesting no snapshot capture. We also discovered that it appears sceneWillResignActive not always be called (it usually is) but occasionally you can swipe into the app switcher without it being called but that sceneDidEnterBackground is triggered more consistently. It appears the Wallet app behaves as I'd expect with sceneDidEnterBackground on card details screens as well (ejecting you to the card preview if you switch apps) but will keep you on the card details screen upon becoming inactive. Questions: Is sceneDidEnterBackground(_:) still Apple’s recommended place to obscure sensitive content, or should apps handle this earlier (e.g. on inactive)? Would it actually be recommended against using sceneWillResignActive active given it seems to not be gauranteed to be called? Ask: Provide an updated version of QA1838 to solidfy the extrapolation of applicationDidEnterBackground -> sceneDidEnterBackground Consider adding explicit guidance to sceneWillResignActive documentation

This is probably abusing the system more than it should be but maybe it is somehow possible. I have: An objective-C based storyboard iPad OS app. I'm beginning to adopt SwiftUI. I have a hosting controller with a content view that has a lazygrid of cards, which have an NSManagedObject for data. On tapping a card, a detail view opens, if in multi-tasking, a new window, if not, pushing the navigation controller (this detail view still exists in UIKit/ObjC, and is handled by sending a notification with the ObjectID, which then triggers a storyboard segue to the detail.) I have zoom transitions on all my things. They work great in Obj.C, especially now with the bar button source. On my iPhone target, I still have an old tableview, and I'm able to zoom properly - if someone changes the detail view's managed object (through a history menu), the zoom context looks up where the tableview is, and scrolls to it while popping. I'd like to somehow do this on the lazygrid - first) to just have an individual card be the zoom source, it should be able to know what the source view is to say in the prepareForSegue method just to zoom at all. and second) if the detail has changed the current ObjectID (which gets passed around as a notification), to somehow scroll the lazygrid to the right object before popping. I've looked at https://developer.apple.com/tutorials/SwiftUI/interfacing-with-uikit but this seems like swiftUI is the host. I have it the other way around, uikit hosting swiftUI pushing uikit. TIA for any pointers

The following is verbatim of a feedback report (FB19809442) I submitted, shared here as someone else might be interested to see it (I hate the fact that we can't see each other's feedbacks). On iOS 16, TextKit 2 calls NSTextLayoutFragment's draw(at:in:) method once for the first paragraph, but for every other paragraph, it calls it continuously on every scroll step in the UITextView. (The first paragraph is not cached; its draw is called again when it is about to be displayed again, but then it is again called only once per its lifecycle.) On iOS 17, the behavior is similar; the draw method gets called once for the 1st and 2nd paragraph, and for every other paragraph it again gets called continuously as a user scrolls a UITextView. On iOS 18 (and iOS 26 beta 4), TextKit 2 calls the layout fragment's draw(at:in:) on every scroll step in the UITextView, for all paragraphs. This results in terrible performance. TextKit 2 is promised to bring many performance benefits by utilizing the viewport - a new concept that represents the visible area of a text view, along with a small overscroll. However, having the draw method being constantly called almost negates all the performance benefits that viewport brings. Imagine what could happen if someone needs to add just a bit of logic to that draw method. FPS drops significantly and UX is terribly degraded. I tried optimizing this by only rendering those text line fragments which are in the viewport, by using NSTextViewportLayoutController.viewportBounds and converting NSTextLineFragment.typographicBounds to the viewport-relative coordinate space (i.e. the coordinate space of the UITextView itself). However, this patch only works on iOS 18 where the draw method is called too many times, as the viewport changes. (I may have some other problems in my implementation, but I gave up on improving those, as this can't work reliably on all OS versions since the underlying framework isn't calling the method consistently.) Is this expected? What are our options for improving performance in these areas?

In iOS 26, with the introduction of the new prominent style buttons like system done, how to apply the tint color for these buttons in globally at app level. We are only able to set for individual buttons using barButtonItem.tintColor and need a way to apply globally. We’ve tried: UIBarButtonItem.appearance().tintColor UIBarButtonItem.appearance(whenContainedInInstancesOf: [UINavigationController.self]).tintColor but nothing worked. sample code: let doneButton = UIBarButtonItem(barButtonSystemItem: .done, target: nil, action: nil) doneButton.tintColor = .systemPink Is there a new recommended way to globally style UIBarButtonItem with the prominent style in iOS 26?

At WWDC the scroll edge effect was presented as a variable blur combined with a soft gradient. Since beta 4 the bottom scroll edge effect has no blur, the top bar sometimes has, but sometimes does not. Even in my own app I have two views with totally different results. This was not changed back in beta 5, so I assume this is not a bug but an intended change. It's hard to design for such a moving target. Especially the missing bottom blur looks bad in a lot of places in my app and I'm debating not shipping the new design if this does not get resolved. Is there any guidance how this effect is supposed to look now? At this point it just seems random and there's no way adjust the way it looks. Phone: Top blur, bottom no blur Settings: Top blur, bottom no blur Notes: No blur at all Music: No blur at all My own app: No top blur My own app: Top blur

I am building a centralized event handling system for UIKit controls and gesture recognizers. My current approach registers events using static methods inside a handler class, like this: internal class TWOSInternalCommonEventKerneliOS { internal static func RegisterTouchUpInside(_ pWidget: UIControl) -> Void { pWidget.addTarget( TWOSInternalCommonEventKerneliOS.self, action: #selector(TWOSInternalCommonEventKerneliOS.WidgetTouchUpInsideListener(_:)), for: .touchUpInside ) } @objc internal static func WidgetTouchUpInsideListener(_ pWidget: UIView) -> Void { print("WidgetTouchUpInside") } } This works in my testing because the methods are marked @objc and static, but I couldn’t find Apple documentation explicitly confirming whether using ClassName.self (instead of an object instance) is officially supported. Questions: Is this approach (passing ClassName.self as the target) recommended or officially supported by UIKit? If not, what is the safer alternative to achieve a similar pattern, where event registration can remain in static methods but still follow UIKit conventions? Would using a shared singleton instance as the target (e.g., TWOSInternalCommonEventKerneliOS.shared) be the correct approach, or is there a better pattern? Looking for official guidance to avoid undefined behavior in production.

I’ve been testing out PaperKit from beta 1 up until 3, then took a break and on my return at beta 7 I find that the .drawing property of the PaperMarkup data model has been removed, i.e. a PKDrawing can no longer be added / modified on PaperKit. Also, the shape recognition feature seems to have been removed. I see this as a tremendous drawback. I filed feedback already: FB19893338 Please bring it back.

Hello, First of all, I've already made a bug report here : https://feedbackassistant.apple.com/feedback/19731998 I'm facing a problem while using UIGraphicsImageRenderer to create an image, that is use to create a UIColor with a pattern via UIColor(patternImage:). It's well displayed for iOS 18.2 and lower, whereas the whole color is blank with iOS 26. -> Please find a sample project linked to the bug report ViewController.swift post that illustrates the issue, in the ViewController.swift file. I'll also link screenshots of the sample app, one built with iOS 18.2 and another with iOS 26.0. Reproduction steps : I create an image with UIGraphicsImageRenderer : let image = UIGraphicsImageRenderer().image { context in // Do anything here } Then I use this image to create a UIColor : UIColor(patternImage: image) I apply this color to the fillColor of a CAShapeLayer : shapeLayer.fillColor = UIColor(patternImage: image) Expected result : Run on iOS 26 and lower and the layer filled with the pattern color is correctly displayed, as it is on iOS 18.2 and lower. Observed result : Run on iOS 26 and the layer is filled with a blank/white color instead of the intended pattern color. Has anyone been facing the problem ? Thanks, Thibault Poujat

In iPadOS 26, Apple introduced macOS-style window control buttons (close, minimize, fullscreen) for iPad apps running in a floating window. I'm working on a custom toolbar (UIView) positioned near the top of the window, and I'd like to avoid overlapping with these new controls. However, I haven't found any public API that exposes the frame, layout margins, or safe area insets related to this new UI region. I've checked the window's safeAreaInsets, additionalSafeAreaInsets, and UIWindowSceneDelegate APIs, but none of them seem to reflect the area occupied by these buttons. Is there an officially supported way to: Get the layout information (frame, insets, or margins) of the window control buttons on iPadOS 26? Or, is there a system-defined guideline or padding value we should use to avoid overlapping this new UI? Any clarification or guidance would be appreciated!

Issue Description: When toggling between the system keyboard and a custom input view, the keyboard height reported in subsequent keyboard notifications becomes incorrect!!! specifically missing the predictive text/suggestion bar height. Environment: Device: iPhone 11 Expected keyboard height: 346pt Actual reported height: 301pt (missing 45pt suggestion bar) Reproduction Steps: Present system keyboard → Height correctly reported as 346pt Switch to custom input view → Custom view displayed Switch back to system keyboard(no suggestion bar) → Height correctly reported as 301pt Trigger keyboard frame change → Height still incorrectly reported as 301pt despite suggestion bar being visible Expected Behavior: Keyboard height should consistently include the suggestion bar height (346pt total). Actual Behavior: After switching from custom input view, keyboard height excludes suggestion bar height (301pt instead of 346pt). key code private func bindEvents() { customTextField.toggleInputViewSubject.sink { [weak self] isShowingCustomInput in guard let strongSelf = self else { return } if isShowingCustomInput { strongSelf.customTextField.inputView = strongSelf.customInputView strongSelf.customInputView.frame = CGRect(x: 0, y: 0, width: strongSelf.view.frame.size.width, height: strongSelf.storedKeyboardHeight) } else { strongSelf.cusTextField.inputView = nil } strongSelf.customTextField.reloadInputViews() strongSelf.customTextField.becomeFirstResponder() }.store(in: &cancellables) }

In our app we have a UICollectionView with Drag&Drop functionality enable and collection view is covering the entire screen. When we drag a collection view item to the edge of the screen it does not scroll the UICollectionView instead that our item turns into the app icon and scrolling blocked. It is happening only if Stage Manager is enabled in the device and if Stage Manager is disabled it is working fine. This issue we are facing after iOS 18.6 release, before 18.6 it was working fine i.e, collection view was scrolling to next items when we dragging an item to edge of the screen, similar to the iOS calendar app when we drag an event to edge it starts scrolling the date. And in iOS 26 if we drag an item to edge, Springboard is getting crashed.

Verbatim of a feedback report (FB18431713) I submitted, duplicated here since we can't see each other's feedbacks, and I wanted a centralized place to track the resolution of this as I'm surely not the only one facing this. When building the app using Xcode 26 beta 2 and running it in an iOS 26 simulator, I'm experiencing a retain cycle in the UINavigationController. From the data I saw in Xcode's memory graph debugger, it seems that _UIViewControllerOneToOneTransitionContext is retaining it. I base this on the fact that the line connecting a view controller and _UIViewControllerOneToOneTransitionContext has a "strong" reference, as indicated in Xcode. (However, I'm reporting this as a retain cycle in UINavigationController, as that's what seems to hold onto this transition-context.)

I have a UIKit app where I've adopted SwiftData and I'm struggling with a crash coming in from some of my users. I'm not able to reproduce it myself and as it only happens to a small fraction of my user base, it seems like a race condition of some sort. This is the assertion message: SwiftData/DefaultStore.swift:453: Fatal error: API Contract Violation: Editors must register their identifiers before invoking operations on this store SwiftData.DefaultStore: 00CF060A-291A-4E79-BEC3-E6A6B20F345E did not. (ID is unique per crash) This is the ModelActor that crashes: @available(iOS 17, *) @ModelActor actor ConsumptionDatabaseStorage: ConsumptionSessionStorage { struct Error: LocalizedError { var errorDescription: String? } private let sortDescriptor = [SortDescriptor(\SDConsumptionSession.startTimeUtc, order: .reverse)] static func createStorage(userId: String) throws -> ConsumptionDatabaseStorage { guard let appGroupContainer = FileManager.default.containerURL(forSecurityApplicationGroupIdentifier: UserDefaults.defaultAppGroupIdentifier) else { throw Error(errorDescription: "Invalid app group container ID") } func createModelContainer(databaseUrl: URL) throws -> ModelContainer { return try ModelContainer(for: SDConsumptionSession.self, SDPriceSegment.self, configurations: ModelConfiguration(url: databaseUrl)) } let databaseUrl = appGroupContainer.appendingPathComponent("\(userId).sqlite") do { return self.init(modelContainer: try createModelContainer(databaseUrl: databaseUrl)) } catch { // Creating the model storage failed. Remove the database file and try again. try? FileManager.default.removeItem(at: databaseUrl) return self.init(modelContainer: try createModelContainer(databaseUrl: databaseUrl)) } } func isStorageEmpty() async -> Bool { (try? self.modelContext.fetchCount(FetchDescriptor<SDConsumptionSession>())) ?? 0 == 0 // <-- Crash here! } func sessionsIn(interval: DateInterval) async throws -> [ConsumptionSession] { let fetchDescriptor = FetchDescriptor(predicate: #Predicate<SDConsumptionSession> { sdSession in if let startDate = sdSession.startTimeUtc { return interval.start <= startDate && interval.end > startDate } else { return false } }, sortBy: self.sortDescriptor) let consumptionSessions = try self.modelContext.fetch(fetchDescriptor) // <-- Crash here! return consumptionSessions.map { ConsumptionSession(swiftDataSession: $0) } } func updateSessions(sessions: [ConsumptionSession]) async throws { if #unavailable(iOS 18) { // Price segments are duplicated if re-inserted so unfortunately we have to delete and reinsert sessions. // On iOS 18, this is enforced by the #Unique macro on SDPriceSegment. let sessionIds = Set(sessions.map(\.id)) try self.modelContext.delete(model: SDConsumptionSession.self, where: #Predicate<SDConsumptionSession> { sessionIds.contains($0.id) }) } for session in sessions { self.modelContext.insert(SDConsumptionSession(consumptionSession: session)) } if self.modelContext.hasChanges { try self.modelContext.save() } } func deleteAllSessions() async { if #available(iOS 18, *) { try? self.modelContainer.erase() } else { self.modelContainer.deleteAllData() } } } The actor conforms to this protocol: protocol ConsumptionSessionStorage { func isStorageEmpty() async -> Bool func hasCreditCardSessions() async -> Bool func sessionsIn(interval: DateInterval) async throws -> [ConsumptionSession] func updateSessions(sessions: [ConsumptionSession]) async throws func deleteAllSessions() async } The crash is coming in from line 30 and 41, in other words, when trying to fetch data from the database. There doesn't seem to be any common trait for the crashes. They occur across iOS versions and device types. Any idea what might cause this?

I've noticed that in iOS 26, Navigation Bar Items' Image Insets parameters as set in Xcode are not being read correctly. Specifically, it appears that on iOS 26 beta, negative inset numbers are being read as positive. Feedback report FB19838333 includes a sample project demonstrating this bug.

I have a question about how UIKit expects us to handle interaction events at scale. From what I understand so far: For UIControls (UIButton, UISwitch, UITextField, etc.), we explicitly register with addTarget(_:action:for:). For gestures, we add UIGestureRecognizer instances to views. For UIView subclasses, we can override touch methods like touchesBegan/touchesEnded. All of this must be done on the main thread, since UIKit isn’t thread-safe. Now here’s my main concern If I have a complex UI with hundreds or thousands of widgets, am I expected to perform these registrations individually for each widget and each high-level event (tap, long press, editing changed, etc.)? Or does UIKit provide a more centralized mechanism? In short: Is per-widget, per-event registration the “normal” UIKit approach, or are there best practices for scaling event handling without writing thousands of addTarget or addGestureRecognizer calls? Thanks!

Hello, I have a number of UIViewControllers that are presented as follows: vc.modalPresentationStyle = UIModalPresentationStyle.popover vc.modalTransitionStyle = UIModalTransitionStyle.coverVertical self.present(vc, animated: true, completion: nil) The VC is designed from a Storyboard where I set the 'view' of the VC to have a .clear 'backgroundColor', I have a smaller 'Alert View' added as a subview which is what the user interacts with. In iOS 13 - iOS 18 this would present modally, not take up the entire screen and allow the user to see relevant context from the screen underneath. In iOS 26 Beta 5 and every beta prior the system injects a 'UIDropShadowView' in the View Hierarchy, this view has a solid color backdrop, either white/black depending on light/dark mode. This causes all underlying content to be blocked and essentially forces a full screen modal presentation despite the existing design. I am looking for a way to remove this solid color. I'm not sure if it's intentional or a bug / oversight. I have been able to remove it in a hacky way, I cycle the view hierarchy to find 'UIDropShadowView' and set it's backdrop to transparent. However when you swipe down to partially dismiss the view it turns to Liquid Glass when it is around 75% dismissed and then resets the background color to white/black. I tried creating a custom UIViewControllerTransitioningDelegate so that I could re-implement the existing behaviour but it's incredibly difficult to mimic the partial dismiss swipe down effect on the VC. I have also tried changing my presentation to: vc.modalPresentationStyle = UIModalPresentationStyle.overFullScreen vc.modalTransitionStyle = UIModalTransitionStyle.crossDissolve This works but then the user loses the ability to interactively swipe to dismiss. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you!

An app built on Xcode 26 (beta4) presents various UIViewCOntrollers. Presentation of any UIViewController that contains a UIToolbar leads to a UIKit crash when run on an iOS 18.5 device, it does not crash when run on iOS 26. The exception logged: *** Terminating app due to uncaught exception 'NSInvalidUnarchiveOperationException', reason: 'Could not instantiate class named TtGC5UIKit17UICoreHostingViewVCS_21ToolbarVisualProvider8RootView because no class named TtGC5UIKit17UICoreHostingViewVCS_21ToolbarVisualProvider8RootView was found; the class needs to be defined in source code or linked in from a library (ensure the class is part of the correct target)' Anyone else seen this? I've submitted a bug report via Feedback Assistant, including a minimal Xcode workspace that reproduces the crash, hoping this will get some attention.