Hello Apple Developer Team, I’m currently using Apple MapKit JS as the main map provider for our logistics, telematics, and HR platform TADMIN, and we are extremely satisfied with its reliability, accuracy, and visual quality. We would now like to expand our Apple integration by migrating our backend reverse geolocation services to Apple as well. However, our current usage requirements significantly exceed the standard 25,000 daily service request limit. At this stage, we already need between 250,000 and 350,000 reverse geocoding requests per day, and this number will continue to grow rapidly. Our TADMIN Tracking product processes live GPS data from connected vehicle telematics boxes, and each vehicle sends an average of 1.5 pings per minute in normal mode. We currently manage around 140 vehicles and are already in discussions with new customers that will add over 1,000 additional vehicles to the platform soon. As our customer base continues to expand, we expect this growth trend to accelerate significantly over the coming months. We already make extensive use of caching to minimize redundant geolocation calls. For example, we reuse location data when vehicles remain within a defined radius. However, since trucks rarely stay stationary for long, there is still a constant flow of new coordinates that require reverse geolocation. To give you a broader picture: TADMIN is a comprehensive SaaS ecosystem for the transport and logistics industry, combining HR management, telematics and tracking, dispatching, and data analysis into one integrated platform. The Tracking module is just one part of this system and serves as the live data backbone for our dispatching, HR, and telematics analytics modules. We would therefore like to increase our quotas for: Service Requests (especially Reverse Geocoding) Snapshot Requests, which we use for our Geofence Alerts. These are sent via push notification and email, and we would love to include the snapshot images in the emails for a clear and visually rich presentation MapKit JS Views, since we also use MapKit JS heavily in our web dashboards, for example in our tracking portal Higher quotas would allow us to rely even more on Apple services, including Autocomplete and Geocoding for customer-facing address searches inside our applications. We already have three apps published on the App Store, with a fourth one scheduled for release this week, and I will soon be upgrading my Apple Developer account to an Organization Account for our company. We are currently evaluating providers for this next stage of integration, as we are preparing a new major version of our TADMIN software, which will introduce a reworked telematics backend. Our goal is to migrate to Apple’s geolocation and map services as part of this new release. Could you please advise how we can best address this use case, for example through higher quotas or an adjusted configuration? Thank you very much for your time and support. Best regards, Timo Köhler Founder & CTO, TADMIN GmbH

Hello, We are a software and hardware development company for the forestry and environmental sectors. We have been based in Quebec (Canada) for over 30 years now. Our Canadian market covers Quebec, Ontario, and the Maritime provinces in the east. We are currently expanding across Canada and into the northern United States. We are on Android platforms with several map and data entry applications. To ensure the success of our expansion, we aim to become part of the Apple family, which is why we are contacting you today. We have developed our own GNSS receiver to increase the location accuracy of our users. This device is called GSFGPS. It uses Bluetooth BLE to communicate with mobile devices and a high-precision GPS that transmits its position using the NMEA protocol. We would like this device to be compatible with an iPhone/iPad. We have developed a mock location application in MAUI (multi-platform). Based on our interpretation of your documentation, we understand that the concept of mock location does not exist at Apple. How can we ensure that our Bluetooth GNSS device is compatible with your iPhone/iPad devices and that they can use the position of the Bluetooth device rather than the internal GPS of your devices? We are a reseller for Juniper Systems, and we know that they have an app on the App Store that has the same features as our product. https://junipersys.com/index.php/support/article/14709 We look forward to your follow-up and recommendations.

Hi, We are using beacon ranging methods to detect beacon in foreground and background in our app. We are using beacon's UUID, major and minor values to create a beacon region and then calling locationManager.startRangingBeacons to range beacons. We listen for beacon updates via the didRangeBeacons delegate method to get beacon data emitted. However, we've observed some inconsistent behavior: The beacon region frequently reports exit events even when the device is within close proximity (approximately 1.5 to 2 meters). There are instances where no beacon updates are received for extended periods (up to 15–20 minutes), despite the beacon being nearby. Generally, The distance between the device and the beacon is approximately 1.5 - 2 meters. What could be the reason for this behaviour and how can we avoid it and continuously receive beacon updates when the beacon is near without any delay? Thanks

Summary While parallel testing Core Location on the new iOS 26.1 beta (23B5044i), I observed what I believe to be a regression of the issue described here: https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/779192 Specifically, user positioning underground subway stations is noticeably inaccurate on the beta, whereas the same scenarios remain accurate on the unupgraded device below. I work with the MTA (New York City) and work with the OP of that thread. Happy to provide additional testing or details if helpful. Please let me know what else you need. Test Info Riding NYCT from Wall St to 34th St Penn Station on the 2 train carrying two iphones Recording: https://limewire.com/d/dpTWi#pDC3GRYIdE Expected: Consistent underground positioning comparable to prior releases. Actual: Degraded/inaccurate underground positioning on iOS 26.1 beta. Test Devices Left Screen: iPhone 15 Pro Max - iOS 26.1 beta (23B5044i) Right Screen: iPhone 11 - iOS 18.6.2 (22G100) Blue dots show location set by CoreLocation. Red dot on iphone 11 shows the actual location of both devices as I was able to manually place while travelling through a station. Placement through tunnels is not easy to verify and not usually indicated. Timestamps Comparison of when train was actually observed in a station vs when 26.1 and 18.6.2 CoreLocation updated to the station Fulton St 1:48 iOS 26.1 correctly updates (correctly) 2:16 iOS 18.6.2 updates (28sec late) Park Place 4:12 train arrives 4:15 iOS 18.6.2 updates to ~near Park Place 5:04 iOS 18.6.2 updates to Park Place (correctly) 6:07 iOS 26.1 update to ~near Park Place (over 2 mins late) Chambers St 6:02 train arrives / iOS 18.6.2 updates (correctly) 6:14 iOS 26.1 updates to ~near Chambers 6:18 iOS 26.1 update to Chambers (correctly) Franklin St 6:52 train arrives 6:55 iOS 18.6.2 updates (correctly) x:xx iOS 26.1 does not update Canal St: 7:16 train arrives 7:18 iOS 18.6.2 updates (correctly) x:xx iOS 26.1 does not update Houston St 7:54 train arrives 8:00 iOS 18.6.2 updates (correctly) x:xx iOS 26.1 does not update Christopher St 8:37 iOS 26.1 presumably between Houston St and Christopher St 8:40 train arrives / iOS 18.6.2 updates (correctly) x:xx iOS 26.1 does not update 14 St 9:22 train arrives 9:28 iOS 18.6.2 updates (correctly) 11:01 as train departs station iOS 26.1 updates (1.5 mins late)

Summary CLLocationSourceInformation.isSimulatedBySoftware (iOS 15+) fails to detect location spoofing when using third-party tools like LocaChange, despite Apple's documentation stating it should detect simulated locations. Environment iOS 18.0 (tested and confirmed) Physical device with Developer Mode enabled Third-party location spoofing tools (e.g., LocaChange etc.) Expected Behavior According to Apple's documentation, isSimulatedBySoftware should return true when: "if the system generated the location using on-device software simulation. " Actual Behavior Tested on iOS 18.0: When using LocaChange sourceInformation.isSimulatedBySoftware returns false This occurs even though the location is clearly being simulated. Steps to Reproduce Enable Developer Mode on iOS 18 device Connect device to Mac via USB Use LocaChange to spoof location to a different city/country In your app, request location updates and check CLLocation.sourceInformation?.isSimulatedBySoftware Observe that it returns false or sourceInformation is nil Compare with direct Xcode location simulation (Debug → Simulate Location) which correctly returns true

Hello, We are a software and hardware development company for the forestry and environmental sectors. We have been based in Quebec (Canada) for over 30 years now. Our Canadian market covers Quebec, Ontario, and the Maritime provinces in the east. We are currently expanding across Canada and into the northern United States. We are on Android platforms with several map and data entry applications. To ensure the success of our expansion, we aim to become part of the Apple family, which is why we are contacting you today. We have developed our own GNSS receiver to increase the location accuracy of our users. It uses Bluetooth BLE to communicate with mobile devices and a high-precision GPS that transmits its position using the NMEA protocol. We would like this device to be compatible with an iPhone/iPad. We have developed a mock location application in MAUI (multi-platform). Based on our interpretation of your documentation, we understand that the concept of mock location does not exist at Apple. How can we ensure that our Bluetooth GNSS device is compatible with your iPhone/iPad devices and that they can use the position of the Bluetooth device rather than the internal GPS of your devices? We are a reseller for Juniper Systems, and we know that they have an app on the App Store that has the same features as our product. https://junipersys.com/index.php/support/article/14709 We look forward to your follow-up and recommendations.

I have a sample that stop working on IOS 26, using the latest XCode and IOS sdk, the onTapGesture event is no longer happening. Maybe this is no longer the way to drop pins on the map. Also not working on the iPhone 17 sim or iPhone 16 max pro device upgrading to IOS 26 Thanks, any help Sample: import SwiftUI import MapKit import CoreLocation import Foundation struct Pin: Identifiable { let id = UUID() let coordinate: CLLocationCoordinate2D } struct ContentTestPinDropView: View { @State private var pins: [Pin] = [] var body: some View { MapReader { reader in Map(selection: .constant(nil)) { ForEach(pins) { pin in Marker("Pin", coordinate: pin.coordinate) } } .onTapGesture { screenPoint in if let coordinate = reader.convert(screenPoint, from: .local) { pins.append(Pin(coordinate: coordinate)) } } } } }

Hello, I am developing with the Nearby Interaction framework using third-party UWB accessories (Murata SR040/SR150). I observed a difference between U1-based and U2-based iPhones: iPhone 12 Pro (U1 chip) NINearbyObject.direction returns valid 3D vector (x, y, z). Distance and direction both work as expected. iPhone 15 Pro and iPhone 16 Pro (U2 chip) NINearbyObject.direction is always nil. Only distance is returned (around 0.35–0.40 m in my test). Effectively behaves as "distance-only mode". Environment: Hardware: iPhone 12 Pro, iPhone 15 Pro iOS version: 18.5 Accessory: Murata UWB SR040 / SR150 App: Using NINearbyAccessoryConfiguration with BLE-based discovery Info.plist includes NSNearbyInteractionUsageDescription Camera assistance was tested both ON and OFF Expectation: I expected the U2 chip to behave consistently with U1, i.e. provide direction vectors when possible. Instead, on iPhone 15 Pro, direction is always unavailable (nil) while distance is returned correctly. Questions: Is this an intentional limitation for U2 chip + third-party accessories? Is there a new requirement (e.g. certification, firmware update, capability flags) to enable direction on U2 devices? Could this be related to NIDeviceCapability or the new Extended Distance Measurement (EDM) mode in U2? Thanks in advance for any clarification.

I am using Xcode 16 to test ARGeoTracking in India with a recorded session from the U.S. (where ARGeotracking is supported), the app remains stuck at "Attaching to App" on my iPad. I've tried two different methods to include the AR session video: placing it in the project folder and adding it to the Shared folder, but neither has resolved the issue.

We are using MapKit JS Look Around and initializing it like this: window.lookAround = new mapkit.LookAround( document.getElementById('container'), new mapkit.Coordinate(listingLocation[1], listingLocation[0]), {openDialog: false}) ; This results in a Look Around scene being displayed correctly but the camera heading is not pointing towards the lat/lng that is passed to initialization. The example lat/lng that we're using is: lat=30.004195, lng=-95.59973 This lat/lng corresponds to the address: 11943 Laurel Meadow Dr, Tomball, TX 77377. The camera is pointing to the other side of the street to house number 11946. If you look for that address in Apple Maps the Look Around points to the correct house. Is there a way to either specify the heading so that Look Around points in the correct heading? Sample link: https://s.hartech.io/zFP2KnsCbsP

I am encountering a coordinate rendering issue using MKMapView in my iOS app. I have a GPS coordinate in WGS84 format, which corresponds to a location in Hong Kong. When my device is physically located in Hong Kong, MKMapView displays the map with the "Apple Maps" label, and the WGS84 coordinate is rendered at the correct position. However, when the device is in Mainland China, MKMapView switches to display "Amap" (Gaode Maps) branding, and the same WGS84 coordinate is rendered at an incorrect position. I understand that Amap in Mainland China uses the GCJ-02 coordinate system, while Apple Maps typically uses WGS84. This discrepancy suggests a potential coordinate system mismatch, but I cannot definitively confirm which map type (and corresponding coordinate system) MKMapView is actually using in different regions. My key questions are: How can I programmatically or visually confirm the underlying map type (Apple Maps vs. Amap) and its coordinate system within MKMapView? Is there a way to simulate the Apple Maps environment for testing when physically located in Mainland China?

I'm experiencing app crashes when calling the CLMonitor initialization function: let monitor = await CLMonitor("my_monitor") According to WWDC 2023: Meet Core Location Monitor, when creating a CLMonitor object with the same identifier, it should access the existing monitor without any mention of app crashes or buggy behavior. However, in my actual testing, attempting to create a CLMonitor object with the same identifier immediately causes an app crash. Here's part of the crash log: Last Exception Backtrace: 0 CoreFoundation 0x19c4ab21c __exceptionPreprocess + 164 (NSException.m:249) 1 libobjc.A.dylib 0x199945abc objc_exception_throw + 88 (objc-exception.mm:356) 2 Foundation 0x19b7a9670 -[NSAssertionHandler handleFailureInMethod:object:file:lineNumber:description:] + 288 (NSException.m:252) 3 CoreLocation 0x1aa25cbb4 +[CLMonitor _requestMonitorWithConfiguration:locationManager:completion:] + 516 (CLMonitor.mm:516) 4 libswiftCoreLocation.dylib 0x22bf6085c CLMonitor.init(_:) + 488 (CLMonitor.swift:280) 5 libswiftCoreLocation.dylib 0x22bf604b9 <deduplicated_symbol> + 1 6 MiniPlengi 0x106372ec9 closure #1 in static CLMonitor.loplatMonitor.getter + 1 (CLMonitor+Extensions.swift:31) 7 MiniPlengi 0x1062ce325 0x106290000 + 254757 8 MiniPlengi 0x1062f6a29 specialized thunk for @escaping @isolated(any) @callee_guaranteed @async () -> (@out A) + 1 (/<compiler-generated>:0) 9 MiniPlengi 0x1062ce325 0x106290000 + 254757 10 libswift_Concurrency.dylib 0x1a7f75241 completeTaskWithClosure(swift::AsyncContext*, swift::SwiftError*) + 1 (Task.cpp:537) Furthermore, even though I've written code to create CLMonitor objects based on a singleton structure to handle these crash cases, the app still crashes: extension CLMonitor { static var loplatMonitor: CLMonitor { get async { struct Static { static var monitor: CLMonitor? static var initializationTask: Task<CLMonitor, Never>? } // If already initialized if let monitor = Static.monitor { return monitor } // If there's an initialization task in progress, wait for its result if let task = Static.initializationTask { return await task.value } // Create new initialization task let task = Task { let monitor = await CLMonitor("my_monitor") Static.monitor = monitor Static.initializationTask = nil // Clean up task after completion return monitor } Static.initializationTask = task return await task.value } } } Is the CLMonitor API still in a stabilization phase and not recommended for production release? I would appreciate guidance on the correct usage. If these issues are expected to persist, I'm wondering if I should continue using the existing CLCircularRegion API instead. Any insights or recommendations would be greatly appreciated.

Reported as FB20357097 In SwiftUI, an empty .safeAreaInset modifier attached to a Map causes the map to become zoomed out to planet level. Minimal reproduction: import SwiftUI import MapKit @main struct map_region_safe_area_inset_bugApp: App { var body: some Scene { WindowGroup { Map { // Any Map content MapCircle(center: .init(latitude: 35.6895, longitude: 139.6917), radius: 1000) } .safeAreaInset(edge: .top) { // No content, `EmptyView()`, `Color.clear` } } } } Note: ZStack { } inside the safeAreaInset prevents the bug. Empty safeAreaInset (bug) Non-empty

I am having a problem with the following scenario. The user opens the Maps app, then selects a location like a store or restaurant, then tap on share and then on my app. On iOS 26, my app stopped showing altogether. After changing the NSExtensionActivationRule to TRUEPREDICATE to accept all, I see this difference between the OS versions. iOS 18.5 (lldb) po extensionContext?.inputItems ▿ Optional<Array<Any>> ▿ some : 1 element - 0 : <NSExtensionItem: 0x60000000c5d0> - userInfo: { NSExtensionItemAttachmentsKey = ( "<NSItemProvider: 0x600002930d20> {types = (\n \"public.plain-text\"\n)}", "<NSItemProvider: 0x600002930c40> {types = (\n \"com.apple.mapkit.map-item\"\n)}", "<NSItemProvider: 0x600002930bd0> {types = (\n \"public.url\"\n)}" ); NSExtensionItemAttributedContentTextKey = {length = 329, bytes = 0x7b5c7274 66315c61 6e73695c 616e7369 ... 656e7472 61616c7d }; "com.apple.UIKit.NSExtensionItemUserInfoIsContentManagedKey" = 0; } iOS 26 (lldb) po extensionContext?.inputItems ▿ Optional<Array<Any>> ▿ some : 1 element - 0 : <NSExtensionItem: 0x60000000cbd0> - userInfo: { NSExtensionItemAttachmentsKey = ( "<NSItemProvider: 0x60000293afb0> {types = (\n \"public.url\"\n)}", "<NSItemProvider: 0x60000293bf70> {types = (\n \"public.plain-text\"\n)}" ); "com.apple.UIKit.NSExtensionItemUserInfoIsContentManagedKey" = 0; } Please notice how iOS 26 is no longer sending com.apple.mapkit.map-item. Is there an alternative way to read the info from the map location shared to my app?

I am having a problem with the following scenario. The user opens the Maps app, then selects a location like a store or restaurant, then taps on share and then on my app. On iOS 26, my app stopped showing as an option to receive the location altogether. After changing the NSExtensionActivationRule to TRUEPREDICATE to accept all, I see this difference between the OS versions. iOS 18.5 (lldb) po extensionContext?.inputItems ▿ Optional<Array<Any>> ▿ some : 1 element - 0 : <NSExtensionItem: 0x60000000c5d0> - userInfo: { NSExtensionItemAttachmentsKey = ( "<NSItemProvider: 0x600002930d20> {types = (\n \"public.plain-text\"\n)}", "<NSItemProvider: 0x600002930c40> {types = (\n \"com.apple.mapkit.map-item\"\n)}", "<NSItemProvider: 0x600002930bd0> {types = (\n \"public.url\"\n)}" ); NSExtensionItemAttributedContentTextKey = {length = 329, bytes = 0x7b5c7274 66315c61 6e73695c 616e7369 ... 656e7472 61616c7d }; "com.apple.UIKit.NSExtensionItemUserInfoIsContentManagedKey" = 0; } iOS 26 (lldb) po extensionContext?.inputItems ▿ Optional<Array<Any>> ▿ some : 1 element - 0 : <NSExtensionItem: 0x60000000cbd0> - userInfo: { NSExtensionItemAttachmentsKey = ( "<NSItemProvider: 0x60000293afb0> {types = (\n \"public.url\"\n)}", "<NSItemProvider: 0x60000293bf70> {types = (\n \"public.plain-text\"\n)}" ); "com.apple.UIKit.NSExtensionItemUserInfoIsContentManagedKey" = 0; } Please notice how iOS 26 stopped sending com.apple.mapkit.map-item Is it no longer possible to get a MKMapItem item out of the extension contents from the Maps app? I would appreciate any pointers on how to extract the info of the shared location from the Maps app.

In the last few months we have seen a lot of the following errors in which it fails to retrieve location information. This seems to happen across multiple browsers and feels related to apple/mac OS more than the browsers. Error: "CoreLocationProvider: CoreLocation framework reported a kCLErrorLocationUnknown failure." Any suggestions or an ETA on when this can be fixed? I have seen other threads/posts on this but wanted a new one to highlight the issue is prevalent.

We developed an IMDF indoor map for a client (paid work) which we submitted to Apple a few months ago. Our client is wondering how many months the approval process will take. Also, we would like to get paid for the work. Any estimate from that team would be appreciated. Thank you

Pinned 2 homes address for the same contact Steps Initial check in Apple Maps No saved places or pinned addresses appear. Open Personal Contacts You have two addresses stored in your contact card: Main and Home. Pin & Edit “Main” You pinned the Main address in Maps. Refined the location on the map. Renamed it (but still saved under the type “My Home”). Open “Home” Address in Contacts Refined the location again. Changed the type to “My Home.” Attempted to rename, but no option to change the label. Final Saved Places View Shows two entries both called “Main.” Opening either of them displays the same details for the Home address. Saved Places list only shows the full address text, without the ability to rename them inside Maps. Results Both addresses appear duplicated with the same name (“Main”), even though they point to different underlying addresses. When selecting either entry, Apple Maps incorrectly shows the same Home address details. The Saved Places section does not allow renaming; it defaults to showing the full address string. Issues Identified Sync Conflict Between Contacts & Maps Apple Maps pulls labels/types from Contacts, but the edits don’t update consistently across apps. Duplicate Naming Bug Both “Main” and “Home” collapse into “Main” in Saved Places, making them indistinguishable. One-to-One Mapping Failure Regardless of which saved place you open, Maps shows the same Home entry, meaning the system isn’t correctly binding each saved place to its respective contact address. Renaming Limitation Apple Maps doesn’t allow renaming saved addresses directly — it relies on Contacts. Since Contacts only supports preset labels (Home, Work, School, etc.), custom naming is blocked.

Hello, CLServiceSession is not on macOS. Does anyone have a drop-in CLServiceSession like replacement for macOS that wraps CLLocationManager? I would like to migrate to the latest for the other platforms. FWIW I filed FB17910626 Thanks!

We have a that relies on accurate GPS location but we’ve noticed that every now and then the location ‘jumps’ a few hundred meters to a different location but reports horizonal accuracy less than 10m. we think the device is picking up a rough location from a local WiFi rather than internal gps sensors. can we a) disable WiFi location Updates? b) identify WiFi location Updates? thank You