Search results for

“4.3”

624 results found

Post

Replies

Boosts

Views

Activity

4.3 Design Spam - Roadblock
Hi, I am stuck at Design Spam, I have done numerous revisions but still i am getting We still noticed your app shares a similar binary, metadata, and/or concept as apps submitted to the App Store by other developers, with only minor differences. from app review team. The app which I am trying to submit is a simple social media app, and its been almost a month it could not pass the review. I have updated meta data, updated assets but still app is getting rejected. Has anyone faced similar case, if yes then how did they solved it? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks
Topic: App Store Distribution & Marketing SubTopic: App Review
1
0
373
Nov ’24
Reply to App Review rejected due to Guideline 4.3(a) - Design - Spam App Store Distribution & Marketing
Thanks Jay_limbani for this topic, I'm facing this issue as well. Let me borrow your topic to ask Apple App Review Team to assit me, hope you don't mind. Appreciate and thank you. Submission ID : c845d491-a9e6-46b2-81d1-acb659cf55c6 Dear App Review Team, I hope this message finds you well. Harmonian is not just another app; it’s a heartfelt effort to create a platform where individuals facing life’s challenges can find support, guidance, and hope. It is a unique, ad-free space focused on fostering mental well-being, empathy, and positive engagement—unlike entertainment-driven or generic platforms. Our mission is to make a meaningful difference by helping people connect, share, and uplift one another in a safe and harmonious environment. I understand your concerns under Guideline 4.3(a) regarding similarities with other apps. While certain features may seem familiar, I assure you that Harmonian is fundamentally different in its purpose, execution, and user experience. It is built with a focus on pers
Topic: App Store Distribution & Marketing SubTopic: App Review Tags:
Nov ’24
Seeking Assistance to Address Guideline 4.3(a) Rejection - App Concept and Functionality Concerns
Hello Apple Developer Community, I hope this message finds you well. My app submission was recently rejected under Guideline 4.3(a) due to the App Review Team's determination that my app shares similarities in binary, metadata, and concept with apps submitted by other developers, with only minor differences. The feedback I received stated: We still found that your app shares a similar binary, metadata, and concept as apps submitted to the App Store by other developers, with only minor differences. Since we do not accept spam apps on the App Store, we encourage you to review your app concept and submit a unique app with distinct content and functionality. I have already made significant efforts to differentiate my app by implementing unique features and functionality tailored to my audience. However, I’d like to better understand: What specific aspects of my app might be contributing to the similarity concerns? How can I further highlight the unique features and functionality of my app to meet Apple's
Topic: App Store Distribution & Marketing SubTopic: App Review Tags:
1
0
392
Nov ’24
App rejection - Guideline 4.3(a) - Design - Spam
Hello, i have built an app in Unity, the first app I’ve attempted to submit to the App Store. It is a unique app that links to our web shop. Each time the submission is rejected due to “Guideline 4.3(a) - Design - Spam” with some generic info: “We noticed your app shares a similar binary, metadata, and/or concept as apps previously submitted by a terminated Apple Developer Program account. Submitting similar or repackaged apps is a form of spam that creates clutter and makes it difficult for users to discover new apps.” Quite bizarre since this is the first time submitting the app! Nobody ever responds to emails to give further information, frustrating considering you pay £79 for this service…
Topic: App Store Distribution & Marketing SubTopic: App Review
2
0
661
Nov ’24
App Review rejected due to Guideline 4.3(a) - Design - Spam App Store Distribution & Marketing
Hello, My app was rejected because of App Review Guideline 4.3(a). The guideline says: Don’t create multiple Bundle IDs of the same app. If your app has different versions for specific locations, sports teams, universities, etc., consider submitting a single app and provide the variations using in-app purchase. The original answer is: We noticed your app shares a similar binary, metadata, and/or concept as apps submitted to the App Store by other developers, with only minor differences. Submitting similar or repackaged apps is a form of spam that creates clutter and makes it difficult for users to discover new apps. I am very confused. I just bought a Mac and iPhone So I don't have other apps in the Apple App Store. I created my app all by myself and did not repacked another apps or similar procedure. I have only one bundle id. There is one app with a similar concept in the store which unfortunately has the name weapon mods for gmod. So I renamed my app for iOS to map addons for gmod to addons for g
Topic: App Store Distribution & Marketing SubTopic: App Review Tags:
2
0
875
Nov ’24
App Review rejected due to Guideline 4.3(a) - Design - Spam
Hello, My app was rejected because of App Review Guideline 4.3(a). The guideline says: Don’t create multiple Bundle IDs of the same app. If your app has different versions for specific locations, sports teams, universities, etc., consider submitting a single app and provide the variations using in-app purchase. The original answer is: We noticed your app shares a similar binary, metadata, and/or concept as apps submitted to the App Store by other developers, with only minor differences. Submitting similar or repackaged apps is a form of spam that creates clutter and makes it difficult for users to discover new apps. I am very confused. I just bought a Mac and iPhone and ported my Android app Travel Trivia from Weltraumerei to iOS. So I don't have other apps in the Apple App Store. I created my app all by myself and did not repacked another apps or similar procedure. I have only one bundle id. There is one app with a similar concept in the store which unfortunately has the name Travel Trivia. So I ren
Topic: App Store Distribution & Marketing SubTopic: App Review Tags:
2
0
1.1k
Nov ’24
App Review
HI Team! I had submitted an update for my game which was already live. I didn’t change any designs in the game, I just removed the bugs and added a 'Rate Us' button link. Still, my game is being flagged at 4.3, even though it was previously live and running fine on the app store.
Topic: App Store Distribution & Marketing SubTopic: App Review
1
0
271
Nov ’24
1st App - iOS App Rejection Due to 4.3 Design: Spam
Very first app, rejected for Spam? It seems this is quite common. This 4.3 spam reason, generally means the app is considered low quality or it's already saturated, right? There are only a handful of Free dinosaur sound apps, so I can't see the saturated reasoning. My app arguably looks better and has a better UI, the rest are pretty dated or are pretty basic. My app has a video for each dinosaur, with is unique to my app, compared to all the others. All sounds are original, the rest use royalty free sources. I'm really at a loss as to why it's considered spam, compared to what's already up there. Any tips on how to get my app approved? I'm not exactly sure how to make it better or more unique than the competition. Thanks
Topic: App Store Distribution & Marketing SubTopic: App Review
1
0
439
Oct ’24
Appealing 4.3 Design-Spam
Hi, Our business has recently been dealing with getting our app rejected for 4.3 Design Spam. I've sent an appeal and sent a follow up as we weren't hearing back. For context, we've been getting this as our rejection w.o any specific reasons for us to address. We've been in the app store over 3 years and have been compliant throughout and to suddenly get this while trying to push new content, fixes, and updates to our new users has put a hindrance to our business. All our code and designs were build in house (and or used from open source sdks) and we have mechanics that are unique to our app. We want to continue to be compliant, but to just be left in the dark isn't exactly productive of both of our times. Thank You
Topic: App Store Distribution & Marketing SubTopic: App Review Tags:
3
0
496
Oct ’24
4.3 Design-Spam
Im Enrik Sulaj , a new developer and i have a small problem . App store review team is automated by bots, and since i cant find an solution to my problem . One of my games got rejected many times for different reasons , i solved all 8 reasons my game got rejected . In the end i got a big surprise , 4.3 Design-Spam . Even that my app is unique , inovation idea in tap to earn coin games it got rejected . I think Apple want only the old creators and the best ones , and for the new creators they make the road really hard .I have another game that got rejected for the samereason even that is a new idea in car games , and guess what , the app review team is not helpful , they say the game is repackaged and duplicated . In fact i created the games with new assets , also i created assets and the assets are never used before .I m honest , as a new creator im starting to hate Apple , not as a company , but it has bad employes and bots that dont help you . Its the truth . Apple need to do something to fix this
Topic: App Store Distribution & Marketing SubTopic: App Review Tags:
2
0
950
Oct ’24
App Review-4.3 spam
Our team has recently encountered a tricky issue: our game app was rejected during the App Store review process due to Guideline 4.3(a) - Design - Spam. We firmly believe this to be a miscarriage of judgment, as our game app is entirely self-developed and does not copy or imitate any other app. We've noted that the App Store review team may have considered our app to share similar binaries, metadata, and/or concepts with other apps on the App Store. However, we would like to emphasize that our team has invested a significant amount of time, effort, and creativity in developing this app. Despite our best efforts, our app was still rejected. We are sincerely seeking help and advice from the Apple Developer Forums community. Have any other developers encountered a similar situation, and if so, how did you resolve it?
Topic: App Store Distribution & Marketing SubTopic: App Review Tags:
3
0
752
Oct ’24
App Rejection 4.3 Spam
Greetings, We have been rejected in the review of our App for a code non-compliance with 4.3 Design guidelines. Our App appears to be similar to others, and indeed it is similar in functionality and appearance. The others that are similar have been developed by us as well, these being customisations that are specifically targeted at the companies or accounts we deal with. The truth is that we have gone through several reviews of the other Apps before when we submitted them for publication at the time. We know that there are other development companies that customise Apps for different brands and in these cases there has been no reason for rejection by the Apple Store. We are beginning to think that there may be certain factors that are directly influencing the rejection of this App: The mockups or screenshots we are using are similar to those of another App we have published with the same functionalities. The backgrounds of the App have a gem of colours similar to that of the other App. And now we wo
Topic: App Store Distribution & Marketing SubTopic: App Review Tags:
0
0
705
Oct ’24
Rejected Due to 4.3(a) Design - Spam
Hello everyone, I updated a new version to fix bugs and add more levels, but Apple rejected it citing spam design 4.3(a). Everything in the game is created by my team, and we did not copy or imitate any other product. We discovered that a studio has unpacked our game and stolen all our images, sounds, and many other files, even the file names match ours. Our game was released over a month before theirs, while they just released their first version a week ago. Despite being the original version, our game was rejected for spam. Currently, our game is generating $10k daily in IAP and we are spending a lot on ads. We are in urgent need of updating the game. I’m really frustrated that this issue has not been resolved yet. I have submitted all the information and evidence to the Apple Review Board, but I haven’t received any response so far.
Topic: App Store Distribution & Marketing SubTopic: App Review Tags:
1
0
562
Oct ’24
Reply to Apple Practices Concerning Published Apps and Their Updates
Welcome to the forum. But the forum is not really intended for such warnings. It is to help solve issues. The fact is not that reviewer does not want you to update, it is that in the new review, he/she has evaluated your games as spam (for good reason or not, that's a question we cannot answer). Have you answered to the review explaining why you consider your apps are not spam ? You have certainly read the guidelines; it may help you understand the reason for rejection and better explain in your comments: 4.3 Spam (a) Don’t create multiple Bundle IDs of the same app. If your app has different versions for specific locations, sports teams, universities, etc., consider submitting a single app and provide the variations using in-app purchase. (b) Also avoid piling on to a category that is already saturated; the App Store has enough fart, burp, flashlight, fortune telling, dating, drinking games, and Kama Sutra apps, etc. already. We will reject these apps unless they provide a unique, high-quality exper
Topic: App Store Distribution & Marketing SubTopic: App Review Tags:
Oct ’24
4.3 Design Spam - Roadblock
Hi, I am stuck at Design Spam, I have done numerous revisions but still i am getting We still noticed your app shares a similar binary, metadata, and/or concept as apps submitted to the App Store by other developers, with only minor differences. from app review team. The app which I am trying to submit is a simple social media app, and its been almost a month it could not pass the review. I have updated meta data, updated assets but still app is getting rejected. Has anyone faced similar case, if yes then how did they solved it? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks
Topic: App Store Distribution & Marketing SubTopic: App Review
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
373
Activity
Nov ’24
Reply to App Review rejected due to Guideline 4.3(a) - Design - Spam App Store Distribution & Marketing
Thanks Jay_limbani for this topic, I'm facing this issue as well. Let me borrow your topic to ask Apple App Review Team to assit me, hope you don't mind. Appreciate and thank you. Submission ID : c845d491-a9e6-46b2-81d1-acb659cf55c6 Dear App Review Team, I hope this message finds you well. Harmonian is not just another app; it’s a heartfelt effort to create a platform where individuals facing life’s challenges can find support, guidance, and hope. It is a unique, ad-free space focused on fostering mental well-being, empathy, and positive engagement—unlike entertainment-driven or generic platforms. Our mission is to make a meaningful difference by helping people connect, share, and uplift one another in a safe and harmonious environment. I understand your concerns under Guideline 4.3(a) regarding similarities with other apps. While certain features may seem familiar, I assure you that Harmonian is fundamentally different in its purpose, execution, and user experience. It is built with a focus on pers
Topic: App Store Distribution & Marketing SubTopic: App Review Tags:
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Nov ’24
Seeking Assistance to Address Guideline 4.3(a) Rejection - App Concept and Functionality Concerns
Hello Apple Developer Community, I hope this message finds you well. My app submission was recently rejected under Guideline 4.3(a) due to the App Review Team's determination that my app shares similarities in binary, metadata, and concept with apps submitted by other developers, with only minor differences. The feedback I received stated: We still found that your app shares a similar binary, metadata, and concept as apps submitted to the App Store by other developers, with only minor differences. Since we do not accept spam apps on the App Store, we encourage you to review your app concept and submit a unique app with distinct content and functionality. I have already made significant efforts to differentiate my app by implementing unique features and functionality tailored to my audience. However, I’d like to better understand: What specific aspects of my app might be contributing to the similarity concerns? How can I further highlight the unique features and functionality of my app to meet Apple's
Topic: App Store Distribution & Marketing SubTopic: App Review Tags:
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
392
Activity
Nov ’24
App rejection - Guideline 4.3(a) - Design - Spam
Hello, i have built an app in Unity, the first app I’ve attempted to submit to the App Store. It is a unique app that links to our web shop. Each time the submission is rejected due to “Guideline 4.3(a) - Design - Spam” with some generic info: “We noticed your app shares a similar binary, metadata, and/or concept as apps previously submitted by a terminated Apple Developer Program account. Submitting similar or repackaged apps is a form of spam that creates clutter and makes it difficult for users to discover new apps.” Quite bizarre since this is the first time submitting the app! Nobody ever responds to emails to give further information, frustrating considering you pay £79 for this service…
Topic: App Store Distribution & Marketing SubTopic: App Review
Replies
2
Boosts
0
Views
661
Activity
Nov ’24
App Review rejected due to Guideline 4.3(a) - Design - Spam App Store Distribution & Marketing
Hello, My app was rejected because of App Review Guideline 4.3(a). The guideline says: Don’t create multiple Bundle IDs of the same app. If your app has different versions for specific locations, sports teams, universities, etc., consider submitting a single app and provide the variations using in-app purchase. The original answer is: We noticed your app shares a similar binary, metadata, and/or concept as apps submitted to the App Store by other developers, with only minor differences. Submitting similar or repackaged apps is a form of spam that creates clutter and makes it difficult for users to discover new apps. I am very confused. I just bought a Mac and iPhone So I don't have other apps in the Apple App Store. I created my app all by myself and did not repacked another apps or similar procedure. I have only one bundle id. There is one app with a similar concept in the store which unfortunately has the name weapon mods for gmod. So I renamed my app for iOS to map addons for gmod to addons for g
Topic: App Store Distribution & Marketing SubTopic: App Review Tags:
Replies
2
Boosts
0
Views
875
Activity
Nov ’24
App Review rejected due to Guideline 4.3(a) - Design - Spam
Hello, My app was rejected because of App Review Guideline 4.3(a). The guideline says: Don’t create multiple Bundle IDs of the same app. If your app has different versions for specific locations, sports teams, universities, etc., consider submitting a single app and provide the variations using in-app purchase. The original answer is: We noticed your app shares a similar binary, metadata, and/or concept as apps submitted to the App Store by other developers, with only minor differences. Submitting similar or repackaged apps is a form of spam that creates clutter and makes it difficult for users to discover new apps. I am very confused. I just bought a Mac and iPhone and ported my Android app Travel Trivia from Weltraumerei to iOS. So I don't have other apps in the Apple App Store. I created my app all by myself and did not repacked another apps or similar procedure. I have only one bundle id. There is one app with a similar concept in the store which unfortunately has the name Travel Trivia. So I ren
Topic: App Store Distribution & Marketing SubTopic: App Review Tags:
Replies
2
Boosts
0
Views
1.1k
Activity
Nov ’24
App Review
HI Team! I had submitted an update for my game which was already live. I didn’t change any designs in the game, I just removed the bugs and added a 'Rate Us' button link. Still, my game is being flagged at 4.3, even though it was previously live and running fine on the app store.
Topic: App Store Distribution & Marketing SubTopic: App Review
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
271
Activity
Nov ’24
1st App - iOS App Rejection Due to 4.3 Design: Spam
Very first app, rejected for Spam? It seems this is quite common. This 4.3 spam reason, generally means the app is considered low quality or it's already saturated, right? There are only a handful of Free dinosaur sound apps, so I can't see the saturated reasoning. My app arguably looks better and has a better UI, the rest are pretty dated or are pretty basic. My app has a video for each dinosaur, with is unique to my app, compared to all the others. All sounds are original, the rest use royalty free sources. I'm really at a loss as to why it's considered spam, compared to what's already up there. Any tips on how to get my app approved? I'm not exactly sure how to make it better or more unique than the competition. Thanks
Topic: App Store Distribution & Marketing SubTopic: App Review
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
439
Activity
Oct ’24
Reply to Appealing 4.3 Design-Spam
My games also the same , rejected for 4.3 even that not violating anything . Do not give up and try again , i dont know what to do for this . The team is not helpful , they dont tell us how to fix it
Topic: App Store Distribution & Marketing SubTopic: App Review Tags:
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Oct ’24
Appealing 4.3 Design-Spam
Hi, Our business has recently been dealing with getting our app rejected for 4.3 Design Spam. I've sent an appeal and sent a follow up as we weren't hearing back. For context, we've been getting this as our rejection w.o any specific reasons for us to address. We've been in the app store over 3 years and have been compliant throughout and to suddenly get this while trying to push new content, fixes, and updates to our new users has put a hindrance to our business. All our code and designs were build in house (and or used from open source sdks) and we have mechanics that are unique to our app. We want to continue to be compliant, but to just be left in the dark isn't exactly productive of both of our times. Thank You
Topic: App Store Distribution & Marketing SubTopic: App Review Tags:
Replies
3
Boosts
0
Views
496
Activity
Oct ’24
4.3 Design-Spam
Im Enrik Sulaj , a new developer and i have a small problem . App store review team is automated by bots, and since i cant find an solution to my problem . One of my games got rejected many times for different reasons , i solved all 8 reasons my game got rejected . In the end i got a big surprise , 4.3 Design-Spam . Even that my app is unique , inovation idea in tap to earn coin games it got rejected . I think Apple want only the old creators and the best ones , and for the new creators they make the road really hard .I have another game that got rejected for the samereason even that is a new idea in car games , and guess what , the app review team is not helpful , they say the game is repackaged and duplicated . In fact i created the games with new assets , also i created assets and the assets are never used before .I m honest , as a new creator im starting to hate Apple , not as a company , but it has bad employes and bots that dont help you . Its the truth . Apple need to do something to fix this
Topic: App Store Distribution & Marketing SubTopic: App Review Tags:
Replies
2
Boosts
0
Views
950
Activity
Oct ’24
App Review-4.3 spam
Our team has recently encountered a tricky issue: our game app was rejected during the App Store review process due to Guideline 4.3(a) - Design - Spam. We firmly believe this to be a miscarriage of judgment, as our game app is entirely self-developed and does not copy or imitate any other app. We've noted that the App Store review team may have considered our app to share similar binaries, metadata, and/or concepts with other apps on the App Store. However, we would like to emphasize that our team has invested a significant amount of time, effort, and creativity in developing this app. Despite our best efforts, our app was still rejected. We are sincerely seeking help and advice from the Apple Developer Forums community. Have any other developers encountered a similar situation, and if so, how did you resolve it?
Topic: App Store Distribution & Marketing SubTopic: App Review Tags:
Replies
3
Boosts
0
Views
752
Activity
Oct ’24
App Rejection 4.3 Spam
Greetings, We have been rejected in the review of our App for a code non-compliance with 4.3 Design guidelines. Our App appears to be similar to others, and indeed it is similar in functionality and appearance. The others that are similar have been developed by us as well, these being customisations that are specifically targeted at the companies or accounts we deal with. The truth is that we have gone through several reviews of the other Apps before when we submitted them for publication at the time. We know that there are other development companies that customise Apps for different brands and in these cases there has been no reason for rejection by the Apple Store. We are beginning to think that there may be certain factors that are directly influencing the rejection of this App: The mockups or screenshots we are using are similar to those of another App we have published with the same functionalities. The backgrounds of the App have a gem of colours similar to that of the other App. And now we wo
Topic: App Store Distribution & Marketing SubTopic: App Review Tags:
Replies
0
Boosts
0
Views
705
Activity
Oct ’24
Rejected Due to 4.3(a) Design - Spam
Hello everyone, I updated a new version to fix bugs and add more levels, but Apple rejected it citing spam design 4.3(a). Everything in the game is created by my team, and we did not copy or imitate any other product. We discovered that a studio has unpacked our game and stolen all our images, sounds, and many other files, even the file names match ours. Our game was released over a month before theirs, while they just released their first version a week ago. Despite being the original version, our game was rejected for spam. Currently, our game is generating $10k daily in IAP and we are spending a lot on ads. We are in urgent need of updating the game. I’m really frustrated that this issue has not been resolved yet. I have submitted all the information and evidence to the Apple Review Board, but I haven’t received any response so far.
Topic: App Store Distribution & Marketing SubTopic: App Review Tags:
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
562
Activity
Oct ’24
Reply to Apple Practices Concerning Published Apps and Their Updates
Welcome to the forum. But the forum is not really intended for such warnings. It is to help solve issues. The fact is not that reviewer does not want you to update, it is that in the new review, he/she has evaluated your games as spam (for good reason or not, that's a question we cannot answer). Have you answered to the review explaining why you consider your apps are not spam ? You have certainly read the guidelines; it may help you understand the reason for rejection and better explain in your comments: 4.3 Spam (a) Don’t create multiple Bundle IDs of the same app. If your app has different versions for specific locations, sports teams, universities, etc., consider submitting a single app and provide the variations using in-app purchase. (b) Also avoid piling on to a category that is already saturated; the App Store has enough fart, burp, flashlight, fortune telling, dating, drinking games, and Kama Sutra apps, etc. already. We will reject these apps unless they provide a unique, high-quality exper
Topic: App Store Distribution & Marketing SubTopic: App Review Tags:
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Oct ’24