With macOS Tahoe, Launchpad has been replaced by an App Library–style mode within Spotlight. While the alleged intention is UX consistency across the Apple ecosystem, the result is both a catastrophic usability regression and a radical break in consistency with iOS and iPadOS. Predefined App Library categorization is functionally incoherent: On iOS and now macOS, Apple’s predefined App Library categories place apps with seemingly identical functionality into unrelated groups—for example, 3D scanning tools scattered across Education, Utilities, and Productivity. Instead of making apps easier to find, this effectively creates a labyrinth that users must traverse to locate apps whose names and icons they may not recall. However Apple defines its app categories, they are not only inconsistent but also hopelessly inadequate for the long tail of real-world applications and user workflows. Loss of user control: Launchpad enabled users to group and organize applications according to their workflows.
Search results for
A Summary of the WWDC25 Group Lab
10,084 results found
Selecting any option will automatically load the page
Post
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Hello, I'm running into an issue with a complex macOS application (non-AppStore) structure involving an unsandboxed system daemon and a sandboxed SSO Extension attempting to communicate via XPC Mach service. The macOS app is composed of three main components: Main App: unsandboxed, standard macOS application. System Daemon: unsandboxed executable installed with a .plist to /Library/LaunchDaemons/ and loaded by launchd. It exposes an XPC Mach Service. SSO Extension: a sandboxed Authentication Services Extension (ASAuthorizationProviderExtension). Main App to System Daemon communication works perfectly. The unsandboxed main app can successfully create and use an XPC connection to the System Daemon's Mach service. But SSO Extension cannot establish an XPC connection to the System Daemon's Mach service, despite using the recommended temporary exception entitlement. I have added the following entitlement to the SSO Extension's entitlements file: com.apple.security.temporary-exception.mach-lookup.global-name my.xp
Summary While parallel testing Core Location on the new iOS 26.1 beta (23B5044i), I observed what I believe to be a regression of the issue described here: https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/779192 Specifically, user positioning underground subway stations is noticeably inaccurate on the beta, whereas the same scenarios remain accurate on the unupgraded device below. I work with the MTA (New York City) and work with the OP of that thread. Happy to provide additional testing or details if helpful. Please let me know what else you need. Test Info Riding NYCT from Wall St to 34th St Penn Station on the 2 train carrying two iphones Recording: https://limewire.com/d/dpTWi#pDC3GRYIdE Expected: Consistent underground positioning comparable to prior releases. Actual: Degraded/inaccurate underground positioning on iOS 26.1 beta. Test Devices Left Screen: iPhone 15 Pro Max - iOS 26.1 beta (23B5044i) Right Screen: iPhone 11 - iOS 18.6.2 (22G100) Blue dots show location set by CoreLocation. Red dot on iph
Topic:
App & System Services
SubTopic:
Maps & Location
Tags:
Beta
Core Location
Maps and Location
Testing
you guys literally need update this video of introducing the swifui webview. these apis even not exist... https://developer.apple.com/videos/play/wwdc2025/231/
CLLocation.sourceInformation.isSimulatedBySoftware not detecting third-party location spoofing tools
Summary CLLocationSourceInformation.isSimulatedBySoftware (iOS 15+) fails to detect location spoofing when using third-party tools like LocaChange, despite Apple's documentation stating it should detect simulated locations. Environment iOS 18.0 (tested and confirmed) Physical device with Developer Mode enabled Third-party location spoofing tools (e.g., LocaChange etc.) Expected Behavior According to Apple's documentation, isSimulatedBySoftware should return true when: if the system generated the location using on-device software simulation. Actual Behavior Tested on iOS 18.0: When using LocaChange sourceInformation.isSimulatedBySoftware returns false This occurs even though the location is clearly being simulated. Steps to Reproduce Enable Developer Mode on iOS 18 device Connect device to Mac via USB Use LocaChange to spoof location to a different city/country In your app, request location updates and check CLLocation.sourceInformation?.isSimulatedBySoftware Observe that it returns false or sourceIn
Topic:
App & System Services
SubTopic:
Maps & Location
Tags:
Security
Core Location
Maps and Location
I have an app that has a Core Data store for dates with descriptions that I'd like to present in a widget with countdown calculations. In the app I have a button that just equates an active calculation to the currently selected item in the database (using an EnvironmentObject). I gather I can't use this mechanism inside a widget, right? The user could put tons of items into the database - so I'm sure I don't want to have an editable widget allowing them to pick. I suppose I could create an intent and allow an independent entering from the app - but that seems rather user hostile since they've already entered it for the app - and I'm still trying to support iOS15 which doesn't support that. I did create an App Group and have the Core Data store available from within the widget, but I don't see how to allow the user to choose which date is active. I also want multiple widgets to be able to point to different dates. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!
Dear Apple Developer Support, I am experiencing a critical issue with Developer ID certificates issued for Turkish (C=TR) developer accounts that prevents code signing on macOS. Issue Summary All Turkish Developer ID certificates issued on October 4, 2025, contain an Apple proprietary extension (OID 1.2.840.113635.100.6.1.13) marked as critical that both OpenSSL and codesign cannot handle. Technical Details Team ID: 4B529G53AG Certificate Country: TR (Turkey) Issue Date: October 4, 2025 macOS Version: 15.6.1 (24G90) Problematic Extension OID: 1.2.840.113635.100.6.1.13 (marked as critical) Evidence I have verified this issue across THREE different Turkish Developer ID certificates: Serial: 21F90A51423BA96F74F23629AD48C4B1 Serial: 461CBAF05C9EDE6E Serial: 184B6C2222DB76A376C248EC1E5A9575 All three certificates contain the same critical extension. Error Messages OpenSSL: error 34 at 0 depth lookup: unhandled critical extension Codesign: unable to build chain to self-signed root for signer errSecInternal
Topic:
Code Signing
SubTopic:
Certificates, Identifiers & Profiles
I am trying to add webhook subscriptions for TestFlight build processing completion and TestFlight beta build review completion events. These were showcased in the WWDC25 session: https://developer.apple.com/videos/play/wwdc2025/324/ Currently, I am able to receive webhook events for distribution updates, and the corresponding checkmark option is available in the App Store Connect portal. However, there is no checkmark option in the portal to subscribe to beta build-related events. In the video, there is clearly a checkmark option for the beta review event subscription (at 4:55). The current documentation also does not mention beta processing and beta review event subscriptions. It only lists the event types that are visible in the web portal: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/appstoreconnectapi/webhookeventtype When I try to add the BUILD_BETA_DETAIL_EXTERNAL_BETA_STATE_UPDATED event (as shown in the video at 6:10) via the PATCH API request, I get the below error. errors: [ { id: ****-****-*
Topic:
App Store Distribution & Marketing
SubTopic:
App Store Connect API
Tags:
Developer Tools
App Store Connect
App Store Connect API
Summary: The minus.capsule and minus.capsule.fill SF Symbols do not render in my project. Other SF Symbols (e.g., plus.capsule and minus.circle) render correctly in the same context. Steps to Reproduce 1. Add an Image(systemName: minus.capsule) or Image(systemName: minus.capsule.fill) to a SwiftUI view. 2. Run the app on the latest macOS. Expected Result The minus capsule symbols should render consistently, similar to plus.capsule. Actual Result minus.capsule and minus.capsule.fill do not render at all. Additional Testing • Replaced minus.capsule with minus.circle: renders correctly. • Swapped the right-hand plus.capsule symbol in my slider with minus.capsule: the symbol fails to render in that position as well. That rules out clipping or layout issues.
Thank you, I've created FB20529610 and attached *.xctestproducts.zip build artifact, I hope that allows you to reproduce the issue? When you say @DTS Engineer Be sure to include links to failing builds in the report. you mean the url when opening the build via AppStoreConnect, right? (Like https://appstoreconnect.apple.com/teams/{teamit}/apps/}appid}/ci/builds/{buildid}/summary ) Because when looking at it in xcode there is no share button or copy url, is there?
Topic:
Developer Tools & Services
SubTopic:
Xcode Cloud
Tags:
I have been working on an app for the past few months, and one issue that I have encountered a few times is an error where quick subsequent deletions cause issues with detached tasks that are triggered from some user actions. Inside a Task.detached, I am building an isolated model context, querying for LineItems, then iterating over those items. The crash happens when accessing a Transaction property through a relationship. var byTransactionId: [UUID: [LineItem]] { return Dictionary(grouping: self) { item in item.transaction?.id ?? UUID() } } In this case, the transaction has been deleted, but the relationship existed when the fetch occurred, so the transaction value is non-nil. The crash occurs when accessing the id. This is the error. SwiftData/BackingData.swift:1035: Fatal error: This model instance was invalidated because its backing data could no longer be found the store. PersistentIdentifier(id: SwiftData.PersistentIdentifier.ID(backing: SwiftData.PersistentIdentifier.PersistentIdentifierBacki
Not sure if I completely understand what you are trying to achieve, but an interactive widget can include a button or toggle, which, when tapped, can perform a task like retrieving data from your Core Data store in a shared App Group container, and doing calculation. This is detailed in Adding interactivity to widgets and Live Activities. The built-in Clock widget in iOS provides a configuration UI that allows selecting a city from a long list. Does it fit your use case? If a configureable widget doesn't fit, providing a button in your widget for users to tap and launch your app to do the configuration may be a choice? Best, —— Ziqiao Chen Worldwide Developer Relations.
Topic:
App & System Services
SubTopic:
Widgets & Live Activities
Tags:
Summary: Expanding HealthKit to support the full spectrum of smart scale metrics will allow Apple Health to remain the central hub for health data, align with user expectations, and future-proof the framework as body composition analysis evolves. Description: With the growing adoption of smart body composition scales (e.g. segmental impedance scanners, multi-frequency analyzers, and body pods), users are generating a wide variety of clinically relevant metrics that currently cannot be stored natively in HealthKit. At present, HealthKit supports a core set of body composition values (Body Mass, BMI, Body Fat %, Lean Mass, Height, Waist Circumference). While useful, these do not capture the full picture modern devices provide, leading to fragmentation: • Users can see dozens of metrics in the device app, but only a handful flow into Health. • Developers must resort to metadata fields, which are inconsistent across apps and not accessible in Apple’s Health app UI. This gap undermines HealthKit’s role as
Until recently, I was able to upload my app with iTMSTransporter version 4.1.0 with the following command: /usr/local/itms/bin/iTMSTransporter -m upload -jwt {x.y.z} -v eXtreme -assetFile /Users/abc/Downloads/build.ipa -assetDescription /Users/abc/Downloads/AppStoreInfo.plist Starting this week, with iTMSTransporter version 4.1.0, the command fails with the following error: [2025-09-03 11:38:02 GET] <main> ERROR: No value present Package Summary: 1 package(s) were not uploaded because they had problems: /Users/abc/Downloads/build.ipa - Error Messages: No value present The same command still works when using the iTMSTransporter bundled with the Transporter app (version 4.0), so the issue appears to be specific to 4.1. Any guidance or confirmation from others experiencing this would be much appreciated.
I'm currently testing this on a physical device (12 Pro Max, iOS 26). Through shortcuts, I know for a fact that I am able to successfully trigger the perform code to do what's needed. In addition, if I just tell siri the phrase without my unit parameter, and it asks me which unit, I am able to, once again, successfully call my perform. The problem is any of my phrases that I include my unit, it either just opens my application, or says I can't understand Here is my sample code: My Entity: import Foundation import AppIntents struct Unit: Codable, Identifiable { let nickname: String let ipAddress: String let id: String } struct UnitEntity: AppEntity { static var typeDisplayRepresentation: TypeDisplayRepresentation { TypeDisplayRepresentation( name: LocalizedStringResource(Unit, table: AppIntents) ) } static let defaultQuery = UnitEntityQuery() // Unique Identifer var id: Unit.ID // @Property allows this data to be available to Shortcuts, Siri, Etc. @Property var name: String // By not including @Property, this
Topic:
App & System Services
SubTopic:
Widgets & Live Activities
Tags:
Siri and Voice
Intents
App Intents