A Summary of the WWDC25 Group Lab

Is there a modifier to make section headers non-sticky? You can use the automatic .listStyle(.automatic) or opt for a lazy stack instead and apply your decorators. For examples, refer to Grouping data with lazy stack views. .listStyle(.automatic) results in in .insetGrouped, so that's a different look. I tried the LazyVStack approach and this worked well for a screen that was pretty custom-styled anyway. Side note: LazyVStack made me a little upset by applying the spacing not only between rows, but also after the section header; requiring dancing around with the spacing and paddings to get the correct look; I wished for a separation of spacing between sections, spacing between rows and spacing between [section header/rows/section footer]. But I'm wondering if this is a well-rounded approach for Views that just want a plain styled data list. It's certainly more feasible with the delicate separators-going-all-the-way-through-to-the-edge-of-the-screen gone in iOS 26, but still, custom-rebuilding all the

The API highlighted by @RickMaddy is one of the only choices, in addition to the newer excludedActivitySectionTypes property. It's worth though taking a step back and looking at your core premises: We are currently developing an enterprise iOS application and are in the process of implementing Data Leakage Protection (DLP) features. In broad terms, an app generally does not have the right level of visibility to understand the mix of user intention and corporate data policies. An app is not an island, and may be only one of several apps to get specific work tasks done. That's why the right thing here is that the device needs to be managed by the enterprise through MDM, so there's a higher level view of what the enterprise intends to allow and disallow through its chosen policies. There's a chain of trust to this — if an enterprise doesn't trust the device by managing it at the device level, then why should it trust a potentially unknown device with an unmanaged app with its sensitive enterprise data? There is

Is there a modifier to make section headers non-sticky? You can use the automatic listStyle .listStyle(.automatic) or opt for a lazy stack instead and apply your decorators. For examples, refer to Grouping data with lazy stack views. Is there a way to get a blurry material behind the section headers when they are sticking to the top bar? You can provide a background for your section header. However you can't provide a material for the scrollEdgeEffectStyle apart from either hard or soft ScrollEdgeEffectStyle. Can you give safeAreaBar(edge:alignment:spacing:content:) a try and disable the scroll edge effect using scrollEdgeEffectHidden. That would allow you provide a view as a custom bar.

I’ve updated to iPadOS 18.6 on the devices currently available to me, and the Local Network permission now appears to be working correctly in the extension. I’ll be able to run the full test suite in our lab environment within 24 hours to confirm this. If everything checks out, I’ll mark this as resolved.

I've only been able to get simultaneous animations playing on a rigged model by using hard-coded FromToByAnimations and ensuring that the animations do not have any collisions in terms of which joints they are animating. Then when using playAnimation, passing a blend layer offset to the each animation group. But I have not tried this approach of using Blend shapes from Blender

Hello! I was able to get a couple of patterns down for glass in charts; some through views and others with chart-specific protocols. here's an example .annotation: extension Charting.Views.Stock.Selection { struct Annotation: View { private let low: Double private let high: Double private let open: Double private let close: Double private let gain: Bool private var time: String public init(_ data: Charting.Model.Candle) { self.low = data.low self.high = data.high self.open = data.open self.close = data.close self.gain = data.gain self.time = data.date.formatted(.dateTime.hour().minute().timeZone(.exemplarLocation)) } @Environment(.colorScheme) private var colors var body: some View { VStack(alignment: .leading) { Group { HStack { Text(Low).font(.caption) Spacer() Text(low, format: .currency(code: USD)) } HStack { Text(High).font(.caption) Spacer() Text(high, format: .currency(code: USD)) } Divider() HStack { Text(Open).font(.caption) Spacer() Text(open, format: .currency(code: USD)) } HStack { Text(C

Thank you! So you are right, I was not starting the daemon, just loading it. I am also able to manually run it, but it required full-disk-access to the Terminal app! We also are creating a FAT binary to run on both Intel and Apple Silicon, so I will test that next. By the way, the examples are seriously lacking in detail - even your example. It took a long time to reproduce simply because there are missing steps. For example, the creating a new application DOES NOT create an Info.plist. That took a while to figure out. Telling someone to delete a key that shows up in that file doesn't really make any sense, particularly when they are not called the same thing in the Info tab in the project settings. Another thing is that once I added the ES code, it would not build because you also need to link the library for it. There were a few other things as well - such as telling me to delete main.storybook, or other things that actually had no extension showing in the project file list. Finally, my main confusion left

Thank you for responding! metadata.json from the .fmadapter package: { adapterIdentifier: fmadapter-foundation-lab-9799725, author: Foundation Lab, baseModelSignature: 9799725ff8e851184037110b422d891ad3b92ec1, creatorDefined: {}, description: Tool adapter., license: , loraRank: 32, speculativeDecodingDraftTokenCount: 5 } Code used to load the adapter: // From test-adapter-minimal.swift:39 let adapter = try SystemLanguageModel.Adapter(fileURL: adapterURL) // Also tried the name-based initializer: adapter = try await SystemLanguageModel.Adapter(name: adapterName) Please help make progress here. Thank you!

It is as-designed that a watchOS app can only start a new extended runtime session (WKExtendedRuntimeSession) when it runs in the foreground and is active, and that it can only schedule one session at a time. (Note that a frontmost app can run in the foreground, but is not active.) For anything beyond that, I’d suggest that you file a feedback report with your use case. Specific to smart alarms, we introduced AlarmKit in WWDC25, which is available in iOS 26 but can forward the alarm presentation to a paired watch when an alarm occurs. You might take a look if that fits your use case. Best, —— Ziqiao Chen  Worldwide Developer Relations.