“eskimo”

But things are working on a real device? Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com

[quote='878795022, yonaries, /thread/777992?answerId=878795022#878795022, /profile/yonaries'] Was anyone able to solve this issue? [/quote] I’m not directly involved in this, so I can’t offer any insights myself. However, I was able to check on the state of the above-mentioned bug (FB21575784). Unfortunately it hasn’t yet yielded anything actionable. The logging supplied with the bug report didn’t contain the info we were expecting, and we’re still waiting for a response to our request for more info. @ayoy , If you get a chance, please open up Feedback Assistant and check out the state of FB21575784. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com

AFAICT this capability is not available for Enterprise distribution. I ran through the process described in Finding a Capability’s Distribution Restrictions and, for my Enterprise test team, it only shows Development and Ad Hoc under Provisioning Support. I recommend that you run through this process yourself, just to be sure. Given that, there’s nothing we can do about this here on the forums. Normally I recommend that folks escalate entitlement issues via Apple > Developer > Contact Us > Development and Technical > Entitlements. However, in this case there might be a better path. You wrote: [quote='817971021, liujitong, /thread/817971, /profile/liujitong'] After prior alignment with Apple engineers [/quote] Does that mean you’ve been discussing this issue with someone at Apple already? If so, that’s proabbly your best path forward. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com

[quote='818199021, dispacthMain, /thread/818199, /profile/dispacthMain'] whats the best way to setup few DNS search domains when using NETransparentProxyProvider. [/quote] There isn’t one. I mean, transparent proxies are kinda meant to be transparent, and monkeying with search domains is anything but (-: However, there are other options in this space. For example, if your product is deployed in a managed environment, you can instruct the site admin to include these search domains. In an unmanaged environment you might be able to apply these settings using NEDNSSettingsManager. It’s focus is on encrypted DNS settings (NEDNSOverHTTPSSettings or NEDNSOverTLSSettings). I’ve never tried it with standard DNS settings (NEDNSSettings) but I can’t see anything that would explicitly block that. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com

[quote='818192021, timboudreau, /thread/818192, /profile/timboudreau'] If there were some sort of signed token, or similar mechanism, that could be bundled or acquired by the running plugin extension [/quote] You should feel free to file an enhancement request for that, but I want to set some expectations here [1]. Apple systems enforce security at process boundaries. If such an API existed: It’d be impossible for the OS to determine whether you’re plug-in made this call, as opposed to some other code in the host app process. Once you had such a token, it’d be impossible for you to prevent some other code in the host app process from ‘stealing’ it [2]. Keep in mind that this “other code” isn’t just the host app itself, but it also includes: Any other plug-in that the host app might load Any code ‘accidentally’ loaded by the host app or these plug-ins [3] The long-term direction here is clear: To meet platform security goals plug-ins must run in a separate process. This is strictly enforced on iOS and it’s gen

[quote='818202021, chenxiyuan, /thread/818202, /profile/chenxiyuan'] process B can no longer be launched directly. [/quote] Correct. [quote='818202021, chenxiyuan, /thread/818202, /profile/chenxiyuan'] This issue is particularly prominent because process B has a window and a Dock icon [/quote] If program B works when run independently, rather than as a child process, then you shouldn’t start it as a child process. Instead launch it as a separate app. There are a variety of ways you can do that, but the two most common are: If you want the program to be running all the time, enable that via Service Management framework. Otherwise, start it with NSWorkspace. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com

[quote='818174021, AmirSwiss, /thread/818174, /profile/AmirSwiss'] Is DeviceActivityReportExtension intentionally sandboxed so Screen Time data cannot be exported to the containing app? [/quote] Yes. See this thread. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com

You can expect that most uploads will be notarised quickly. Occasionally, some uploads are held for in-depth analysis and may take longer to complete. As you notarise your apps, the system will learn how to recognise them, and you should see fewer delays. For lots of additional info about notarisation, see Notarisation Resources. Specifically, it links to a Q&A with the notary service team that’s quite instructive. [quote='878814022, James21180, /thread/818070?answerId=878814022#878814022, /profile/James21180'] It’s frustrating when there is no feedback to understand what’s going on. [/quote] Indeed. I’ve recently filed my own bug requesting better feedback in this case (r. 170230393). Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com

[quote='818029021, Kuroglo, /thread/818029, /profile/Kuroglo'] Could DTS help enable notarization for my team? [/quote] No, sorry. I suspect you might’ve found this post already but, if not, have a read. As I mention there, I’m not able to escalate this. While I’m usually quite happy to wade into other team’s ponds, this specific issue has to be handled through official channels. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com

Let’s focus this discussion on your other thread. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com

Thanks for all that extra info. So, it’s definitely correlated with iOS 26.3. Which is strange, because I can’t think of any iOS 26.3 aligned change to local network privacy that would affect this. You could file a bug about this issue, but I’m not sure it’d get traction. As you noted in your first post, this whole process is a bit of a kludge, and it’s hard to argue that we should fix this (in contrast to FB12846267, which we definitely should fix, but haven’t yet). But if you do file a bug, please post your bug number, just for the record. At this point I think it might be worth considering different approaches. I zenned on that a bit today and I wasn’t able to come up with anything I’m truly happy with. One approach that I like is to have your UI test use some sort of IPC mechanism to the app, have the app connect to the accessory under test, and then proxy the UI test’s requests to that accessory. Unfortunately I couldn’t think of a good way to do that. It is possible to set up an IPC channel between apps

Your setup, prohibiting Wi-Fi and enabling peer-to-peer, is contradictory — peer-to-peer Wi-Fi is a ‘subclass’ of Wi-Fi — so I’m not surprised you’re seeing weird results. [quote='878519022, nikhil2701, /thread/817831?answerId=878519022#878519022, /profile/nikhil2701'] But there are some cases where I want to allow only peer to peer. [/quote] I don’t think that’s feasible without how the networking stack currently works. Well, assuming you’re talking about Apple peer-to-peer Wi-Fi, which is what includePeerToPeer controls. You could change tack and set up your connection with Wi-Fi Aware. IIUC such a connection will never run over infrastructure Wi-Fi. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com

[quote='878529022, ski4funSonoma, /thread/817488?answerId=878529022#878529022, /profile/ski4funSonoma'] Including the sample code in the helper [/quote] Ah, I think you misunderstood that test. I was suggesting that you temporarily add that code to the app, with some sort of debug UI wired up to call it. That has two benefits: If it fails in the app context then there’s something weird going on. If it works in the app context, it should cause Xcode to embed libswiftCompatibilitySpan.dylib which might then ‘fix’ your helper tool. And if that second point is true, it confirms the nature of the problem and suggests a path to a workaround. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com

If it’s a QUIC connection and the logs has a com.apple.WebKit.Networking subsystem, it’s almost certainly HTTP/3. Have you tried the HTTP Traffic instrument? See Analyzing HTTP traffic with Instruments. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com

That looks like a very straightforward sandbox violation. I think this is NFS specific, because my understanding is that other network file systems can be mounted within your app’s container. I’m going to consult with a colleague about this, but I suspect that this is ultimately going to end up being a bug report. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com