“codesign”

I have found that you can also check whether your app executable contains the aps-environment string. For example: grep -n -a aps-environment Payload/MyApp.app/MyApp It did not contain the string before the fix and it did after. This is probably similar to codesign -d --entitlements :- Payload/MyApp.app

Thank you @benjfromlondon for showing me the way! I had the same issue while building using the Xcode@5 in Azure Pipelines although the project was otherwise configured as it should and as many StackOverflow threads indicated it should. I will add below more information about how I fixed the issue and troubleshooting. The fix The Xcode@5 Azure Pipelines task does not sign the archive by default: # Signing & provisioning #signingOption: 'nosign' # 'nosign' | 'default' | 'manual' | 'auto'. Signing style. Default: nosign. #signingIdentity: # string. Optional. Use when signingOption = manual. Signing identity. So I added the following to my Yaml pipeline: (signingOption, signingIdentity and provisioningProfileName) - task: Xcode@5 displayName: 'Build IPA' inputs: actions: 'clean build' configuration: 'Release' sdk: 'iphoneos' xcWorkspacePath: 'ios/MyApp.xcworkspace' workingDirectory: '$(Build.SourcesDirectory)' scheme: 'MyApp' packageApp: true signingOption: 'manual' signingIdentity: 'iPhone Distribution' pr

I’m not exactly an expert on MDM stuff, but my understanding is that the CodeRequirement property is a requirement. It doesn’t have to be the designated requirement of the code in question. Thus, you can create a profile with this property set to a custom requirement, one that’ll accept a development-signed app built by any of your team members. For more background on this, see TN3127 Inside Code Signing: Requirements. Consider this: % codesign -d -r - Test777163 Executable=/Users/quinn/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/Test777163-cihuekycmkocddfnmmrztacqdito/Build/Products/Debug/Test777163 designated => identifier Test777163 and anchor apple generic and certificate leaf[subject.CN] = Apple Development: Quinn Quinn (7XFU7D52S4) and certificate 1[field.1.2.840.113635.100.6.2.1] /* exists */ % cat custom.txt identifier Test777163 and anchor apple generic and certificate leaf[subject.OU] = SKMME9E2Y8 and certificate 1[field.1.2.840.113635.100.6.2.1] /* exists */ % codesign -v -vvv -R custo

System Extensions framework is meant to be called from a GUI application. Is that the case here? I see a lot of folks try to use the framework from a command-line tool (or daemon or whatever) that’s pretending to be a GUI app, and that often ends badly. I'm using a gui container app, it's just the default App macos template from xcode with the init for the App class changed to start the system extension. Check that you’re container app has a reasonable structure and that the sysex is embedded within that: Seems almost identical:  tree Applications/dns-proxy-tests.app Applications/dns-proxy-tests.app └── Contents ├── Info.plist ├── Library │ └── SystemExtensions │ └── com.myteam.dns-proxy-tests.ne.systemextension │ └── Contents │ ├── Info.plist │ ├── MacOS │ │ └── com.myteam.dns-proxy-tests.ne │ ├── _CodeSignature │ │ └── CodeResources │ └── embedded.provisionprofile ├── MacOS │ ├── __preview.dylib │ ├── dns-proxy-tests │ └── dns-proxy-tests.debug.dylib ├── PkgInfo ├── Resources ├── _CodeSignature │ └── CodeR

Error 1 in the OSSystemExtensionErrorDomain is OSSystemExtensionErrorUnknown. That doesn’t sound good. [quote='829698022, conectado, /thread/776759?answerId=829698022#829698022, /profile/conectado'] after that I don't see any of the delegate being called [/quote] And that’s also not good. System Extensions framework is meant to be called from a GUI application. Is that the case here? I see a lot of folks try to use the framework from a command-line tool (or daemon or whatever) that’s pretending to be a GUI app, and that often ends badly. Check that you’re container app has a reasonable structure and that the sysex is embedded within that: QNE2DNSProxyMac.app/ Contents/ Info.plist Library/ SystemExtensions/ com.example.apple-samplecode.QNE2DNSProxyMac.SysEx.systemextension/ Contents/ Info.plist MacOS/ com.example.apple-samplecode.QNE2DNSProxyMac.SysEx _CodeSignature/ CodeResources embedded.provisionprofile MacOS/ QNE2DNSProxyMac … _CodeSignature/ CodeResources embedded.provisionprofile Check that the app is si

The devil is in the details here. First, this: [quote='776479021, baxterjo, /thread/776479, /profile/baxterjo'] from a VScode terminal and I am getting permissions prompts. [/quote] A VS Code terminal is not Terminal. The exception carved out for Terminal doesn’t apply to other terminal-ish apps. What’ll actually happen in the VS Code case is gonna depend on how it implemented its terminal environment. It’s possible that the system will see VS Code as the responsible code for your program and thus VS Code’s Local Network privilege will apply. However, it’s also possible for programs to do things that break that responsibility chain, in which case your program will look like a tool being run in a background context. What happens then is complex. Regardless, this is something to talk about with the VS Code folks. Coming back to Terminal, that exception works as documented, at least in my experience. Consider my built copy of the TLSTool sample code: % codesign -d -vvv `which TLSTool` … Authority=Develo

codesign wants too access my certain key in my keychain