column

I've come across a very similar problem, did anyone ever find a solution?What appears to be happening is that all of the first tilegroup's tiles are being drawn first, and then the second tilegroup's tiles. This works fine if there are no overlaps, and allows batch texture rendering, but won't work in similar cases. I can't see any flags to change, and that problem along with some problems with hexagons means I'll have to roll my own unless anyone knows better.I think the way I'm going to do it is to have SKNodes for the map rows with z's increasing from back to front, and for each column there will be +z as the map goes to the right. I think that means that batching will be affected, so maybe performance will be a problem but first it needs to render correctly, then I can worry about possible performance issues.

As per the documentation: https://developer.apple.com/library/content/documentation/LanguagesUtilities/Conceptual/iTunesConnect_Guide/Appendices/Properties.htmlthe App File Size information should be available once the app is approved by Apple and is available for download.However recently I've been experiencing the same issue of not being able to see the Download Size column of the app. Not sure if this functionality is broken.

1. For a view-based table view, you do not use column bindings:developer.apple.com/library/content/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/TableView/PopulatingViewTablesWithBindings/PopulatingView-TablesWithBindings.htmlAll you need to do is bind the table view content to (in your case as in the above document) an array controllers' arrangedObjects.2. If you bind the table content this way, you do not implement tableView:objectValueForTableColumn:row: because the objectValue for each row is found via the binding.This objectValue is set as the value of the objectValue property of the NSTableCellView for each row/column.Note that there are 3 distinct mechanisms for getting the objectValue property of the NSTableCellView set correctly:a. By binding the table view content. (In essence, the data source isn't used.)b. By not binding the table view content, but implementing the tableView:objectValueForTableColumn:row: delegate method.c. By not binding the table view content, but setting the cell's objectValue proper

Your reply was quite helpful and I quit trying to figure how to get bindings working with this. Too much behind the scenes magic wasting my time.Once I knew I was looking for a solution avoiding bindings, I found a couple gems in the TableViewPlayground sample code that I am pretty sure are not explicitly mentioned in the documentation. Below are details of what I had to do to get a tableView operating without bindings, which IMO, is far easier than bindings once you are aware of the process.VERY IMPORTANT KEYS to building View based DATASOURCE TableViews1. USE BASIC UI items (NSButton), NOT NSTableCellView2. Contrary to #1, you can use NSTableCellView for TextFields, imageViews IF... see below.3. Add your basic UI Items directly to the NSTableColumn, delete provided the NSTableCellView.4. Carefully implement tableView:inTableView viewForTableColumn:inTableColumn row:inRow.Maybe (probably) I am blind, but I trusted the default mechanisms in Interface Builder regardingbuilding tables. Well, they are probably a

A lot of what you said in that last post is kinda sorta correct, but not quite so because you haven't fully absorbed all of the documentation and behavior yet.For example, NSTableCellView is a general-purpose container for the subviews of a cell in a table view. For convenience, it comes with text and image properties that can be connected to a text field and image subview, and has built-in behavior to lay these subviews out in a standard way. In a new table view created in IB, you get cells with just a text field subview (no image), because this matches the default table view created in the old days when we used NSCell-based table views. There are also standard cells in the IB object palette, one with just a text field, and one with an image view as well.If your table cell starts out with a text field you don't need, for example when you want only a checkbox, then it's fine to just delete the text field. This is an extra step, but the cell contains a text field in the vast majority of cases, so it's a reason

The above example is from a raw plist - you can do that in Xcode, but only if needed and you understand how to edit without damaging/malforming the file and it's contents so that Xcode is kept happy. Select the plist in the navigator, then right-click and choose 'open as > source code' (vs. plist), if you must.The view you see with rows, columns and the occasional drop-down, is the 'normal' view that caters to typical edits.In that example, assuming you know the key you want to add*, use the + below, add a new row, then select the leftmost field and start typing the name - Xcode will attempt to auto-fill based on your lead (you don't have to use only known keys/strings, so you are free to create custom when they apply). If you find the key you want, commit, then move to the column on the right to indicate it's value.*note that sometimes a native key you're looking for has been updated and goes by a different name or is new and not listed - be ready to adapt.

What does the whole window mean? The content area? The title bar and other chrome? Are there any parts of the window that don't flicker?Calling reloadData will cause the entire table view to be erased to its background color before the rows are re-drawn, so obviously the table view itself is going to flicker. If more of the window content is getting erased, I'd start to suspect that the table view is incorrectly sized. (You might not notice, normally, because all the columns could be visible, but the table view itself could be wider.)I'd suggest you try using Xcode's view debugger to examine the structure of your window:developer.apple.com/library/content/documentation/DeveloperTools/Conceptual/debugging_with_xcode/chapters/special_debugging_workflows.html