“Apple Maps Guides”

The thing is com.apple.developer.nfc.readersession.iso7816.select-identifiers Info.plist record is also needed in order to work with smart cards through CoreNFC API, but the specific A000000308000010000100 is not required in this record, whereas it seems to be the case with CryptoTokenKit API. It seems weird to me that this behavior occurs on every smart card, independently of what it contains, whereas an AID it the Info.plist record should be needed only if corresponds to an application in the smart card. I can ensure this issue happens on a smart card which does not contain any application with the A000000308000010000100 ID. I understand by reading the Apple documentation (https://support.apple.com/en-gb/guide/deployment/depd0b888248/web), that PIV smart cards have a native support from iOS 16.1. Thus, I believe it is not a coincidence that this AID, which seems to be mandatory for every smart card, is related to PIV. Could it be possible that there is a kind of system default CryptoTokenK

I’m not entirely sure who allocates AID values, but some rummaging around on the ’net confirms that AID A000000308000010000100 is definitely associated with PIV. As to your current issue, the doc comments in for the -[TKSmartCardSlotManager createNFCSlotWithMessage:completion:] method says: Warning Caller requires com.apple.developer.nfc.readersession.iso7816.select-identifiers Info.plist record which specifies application identifiers of the NFC cards link which suggests that your solution is the right one. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com

OK. And sorry to keep asking questions, but I need to understand where you’re heading so that I can check if there’s a path forward. Consider this user scenario: The user creates a network in your app. They then create virtual machine A that uses that network. And set up a port forwarding for A. They then start A. Once A is up and running, they create a new virtual machine B. And configure it to use that same network. And set up a different port forwarding for B. Then, with A still running, they start B. Is that a realistic user scenario that you’re trying to support? Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com

I got the exact same mails and i got this mail today ' Thank you for your reply. As noted in the original notification, manipulating App Store chart rankings, user reviews, or search index is a violation of the Apple Developer Program License Agreement (DPLA) and may result in the loss of your Developer program membership. We suggest you conduct internal investigations to ensure you and any third-parties you may work with are in compliance with the DPLA and App Store Review Guidelines. We also encourage you to closely monitor your app activities. If you notice any unusual activity in the future, please follow these steps: Sign in to App Store Connect > Contact Us > Report a Concern > Report a Fraud Concern. We are unable to provide additional information at this time. Thank you for your efforts to make the App Store a safe and enjoyable experience for users and a great opportunity for all developers to be successful.' and I'm completely lost on what to do now. I had an app go viral and got m

Thanks for the clarification. Before we get further into this, I want to better understand the big picture. I’m already talking with you about this in your other thread. I’m going to follow up there shortly [1]. Once we drive that to a conclusion, I can come back here if necessary. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com [1] Well, it’s be in an hour or so, because right now it’s lunchtime!

[quote='884410022, Richie_Wu, /thread/820894?answerId=884410022#884410022, /profile/Richie_Wu'] I am not able to reproduce it [/quote] Hmmm, that makes things tricky. My experience is that investigations like this go a lot quicker when the product developer is able to reproduce the problem. I recommend that you work with the affected customers to see if there’s anything unique about their environment than triggers the issue. You can approach this problem from both ends: Try to add stuff that they have to your environment. Try to remove stuf that you don’t have from their environment. I also recommend that you ask affected customers to retest with the latest seed of the macOS 26.5 beta. While I don’t have a specific bug fix I can point to, it’s a good idea in general. [quote='884410022, Richie_Wu, /thread/820894?answerId=884410022#884410022, /profile/Richie_Wu'] I shared few system diagnose logs in the FB ticket. [/quote] Thanks. I took a look at the sysdiagnose log and searched for the kernel: bpf26 attached

[quote='884401022, ParinK124, /thread/822456?answerId=884401022#884401022, /profile/ParinK124'] The app in general is slow. [/quote] Ah, OK. There are limits to what you can do about that. I use Swift Playground on my iPad (A16), and it’s not too bad. But there’s almost 5 years of CPU improvements between it and your iPad (8th gen). I think it’d be worthwhile you filing a bug about the performance problems you’re seeing. It’s possible that the Swift Playground team might be able to optimise things at their end. If your issues are general, attach a video recording of you using the app and then point out the parts where you think things are too slow. OTOH, if there’s an issue with some specific action, you can just describe that action in text. If you do provide a recording, record it from some other device, like your iPhone. Normally we suggest folks include a screen recording, but the act of recording the screen can hurt performance and thus undermine the thrust of your bug. If you do file a bug, please post

I'm using SSH into the host itself to try to use virtualization tools to run macOS VMs. OK. So lemme see if I understand this correctly: You have a host Mac. And a VM product that you can run as a command-line tool. You’ve configured that product to run a Mac guest. You SSH into that Mac to run your command-line tool. You’re testing two configurations. In the first, the host is configured to autologin to the GUI. In that case you’re able to consistently start the VM. In the second case… Actually, I’m not sure about this. Is the second case, do you: Manually log in to the host GUI, and then SSH in and run your test? Or not log in to the GUI at all, and then SSH in and run your test? ps It’s better to reply as a reply, rather than in the comments; see Quinn’s Top Ten DevForums Tips for this and other titbits. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com

[quote='884502022, iceboy, /thread/822626?answerId=884502022#884502022, /profile/iceboy'] If I do not set kSecAttrAccount right now, is it possible that I cannot read the keychain items correctly? [/quote] It’s hard to answer this because you’ve phrased it as a negative question. So, lemme rephrase it: If I’m using the data protection keychain (the default on iOS, something you have to opt in to on macOS), And I create a generic password keychain item without specifying kSecAttrAccount, Will I be able to access that item’s contents using SecItemCopyMatching? The answer to that is “Yes.” At the end of this post I’ve included some code that I used to test this. (Sorry it’s in Swift. I built this by cobbling together various existing bits of code that were all written in Swift, and I don’t have time today to convert them to Objective-C.) Having said that, my advice is that, when you creating a generic password item you always populate both kSecAttrService and kSecAttrAccount. If you don’t have a sensible value t

@App Review My app (id 1611398578) is also stuck In Review for a week now after being approved. In App Store Connect -> App Review all the submissions show as Approved. I also got the email and notification that the submissions were approved a week ago (iOS and macOS). I contacted Apple Support and have two open case IDs (102865508515 and 102865870578). I was told the issue has been expedited but there are still no updates or replies from Apple at all and I am stuck and helpless. Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Same here. WWDC is near but no one at Apple care about verification process.