Prerequisite: After the MDM APP issues the command, the camera on the phone is no longer visible (unusable). After upgrading to iOS 26.1, the isSourceTypeAvailable: UIImagePickerControlSourceTypeCamera method keeps returning true when the camera is unavailable. The isSourceTypeAvailable: UIImagePickerControlSourceTypeCamera method on iOS 26.0.1 is normal, returning false when the camera is unavailable and true when it is available.

When our Bluetooth device is scanned and a connection is initiated through the app on the iPhone 17, the air log shows that the iPhone sends an LL_LENGTH_REQ to execute the Data Length Update Procedure. However, our peripheral does not support the Bluetooth LE Data Length Extension, so it responds with an LL_UNKNOWN_RSP PDU with the UnknownType field set to LL_LENGTH_REQ. After receiving the LL_UNKNOWN_RSP, the iPhone 17 does not proceed with the subsequent Bluetooth LE service discovery process. The connection is maintained until the peripheral actively disconnects. Once the peripheral disconnects and continues broadcasting Bluetooth signals, the iPhone 17 repeatedly tries to connect to the peripheral and executes the aforementioned process, even if the app has been terminated. According to the Bluetooth 4.2 core specification ([Vol. 6] Part B, Section 5.1.9), which can be found here: https://www.bluetooth.com/specifications/specs/core-specification-amended-4-2/, the iPhone should accept the LL_UNKNOWN_RSP and terminate the Data Length Update Procedure after receiving it, proceeding with the subsequent operations using the default minimum parameters. Phenomenon: When the app calls the - (void)connectPeripheral:(CBPeripheral *)peripheral options:(nullable NSDictionary<NSString *, id> *)options method, the connection result callback is never received. After a period of approximately 10 seconds, it fails with a callback, displaying the message: central did fail to connect to peripheral: <TY : 45E4A697-31AE-9B5A-1C38-53D7CA624D8C, Error Domain=CoreBLEErrorDomain Code=400 "(null)">.

Prerequisite: After the MDM APP issues the command, the camera on the phone is no longer visible (unusable). After upgrading to iOS 26.1, the isSourceTypeAvailable: UIImagePickerControlSourceTypeCamera method keeps returning true when the camera is unavailable. The isSourceTypeAvailable: UIImagePickerControlSourceTypeCamera method on iOS 26.0.1 is normal, returning false when the camera is unavailable and true when it is available. Please fix this method to determine If the isSourceTypeAvailable: UIImagePickerControlSourceTypeCamera method cannot determine whether the camera is available, please provide an available judgment method.

Hi everyone, I’m working on a custom camera implementation in iOS using native code. My goal is to capture unprocessed, realistic images directly from the camera — without any filters or post-image processing applied by the system. I’ve implemented RAW image capture using the native camera APIs (AVFoundation) and successfully received .dng files. However, even the RAW outputs don’t look like the real environment — the colors, tone, and exposure still seem processed or corrected in some way. I’ve tried various configurations such as photoSettings.rawPhotoPixelFormatType, experimenting with AVCaptureDevice and AVCapturePhotoOutput settings, and reviewing ProRAW and standard RAW behavior, but I’m still not getting truly unprocessed results that reflect the actual sensor data. Has anyone experienced similar results when capturing RAW images on iOS, or found a way to bypass Apple’s image signal processing (ISP) pipeline for more realistic captures? Any insights or references from Apple’s camera framework behavior would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!

Hi everyone, I submitted an app for review and was met with a rejection for unresolved issues. This was what was asked in the rejection: Provide detailed answers to the following questions: -Does your app interact with any hardware? Would that be referring to the camera/microphone of the device? My app uses haptics when you select an option. I didn't see anything in connect where I needed to specify the use of haptics. Also, does this mean that when the reviewer answers me I have to resubmit as a version 1.1? I'm not sure what I would need to change. This is my first app so I'm not entirely sure on the procedure.

Hi everyone, I am developing a .NET MAUI Mac Catalyst app (sandboxed) that communicates with a custom vendor-specific HID USB device. Within the Catalyst app, I am using a native iOS library (built with Objective-C and IOKit) and calling into it via P/Invoke from C#. The HID communication layer relies on IOHIDManager and IOUSBInterface APIs. The device is correctly detected and opened using IOHIDManager APIs. However, IOHIDDeviceRegisterInputReportCallback never triggers — I don’t receive any input reports. To investigate, I also tried using low-level IOKit USB APIs via P/Invoke from my Catalyst app, calling into a native iOS library. When attempting to open the USB interface using IOUSBInterfaceOpen() or IOUSBInterfaceOpenSeize(), both calls fail with: kIOReturnNotPermitted (0xe00002e2). — indicating an access denied error, even though the device enumerates and opens successfully. Interestingly, when I call IOHIDDeviceSetReport(), it returns status = 0, meaning I can successfully send feature reports to the device. Only input reports (via the InputReportCallback) fail to arrive. I’ve confirmed this is not a device issue — the same hardware and protocol work perfectly under Windows using the HIDSharp library, where both input and output reports function correctly. What I’ve verified •Disabling sandboxing doesn’t change the behavior. •The device uses a vendor-specific usage page (not a standard HID like keyboard/mouse). •Enumeration, open, and SetReport all succeed — only reading input reports fails. •Tried polling queues, in queues Input_Misc element failed to add to the queues. •Tried getting report in a loop but no use.

Hi everyone — I’m developing an iOS passkey/password manager where the private key material must be stored on a physical device (NFC card / USB token). I’m hitting a hard limitation: CoreNFC is not available for use from app extensions, which prevents an appex (e.g. password/credential provider or other extension) from talking directly to an NFC card during an authentication flow.  My questions: 1. Is there any plan to make CoreNFC (or some limited NFC-API) available to app extensions in a future iOS version? If not, could Apple clarify why (security/entitlements/architecture reasons)? 2. Are there any recommended/approved workarounds for a passkey manager extension that needs to access a physical NFC token during authentication? (For example: background tag reading that launches the containing app, or some entitlement for secure NFC card sessions.) I’ve read about background tag reading, but that seems to be about system/OS handling of tags rather than giving extensions direct NFC access.  3. Is the only supported pattern for my use case to have the containing app perform NFC operations and then share secrets with the extension via App Groups / Keychain Sharing / custom URL flow? (I’m already evaluating App Groups / Keychain access groups for secure sharing, but I’d like official guidance.)  Implementation details that may help responders: • Target: iOS (latest SDK), building a Credential Provider / password manager extension (appex). • Intended physical token: NFC smartcard / ISO7816 contactless (so CoreNFC APIs like NFCISO7816Tag would be ideal). • Security goals: private key never leaves the physical token; extension should be able to trigger/sign during a browser/app AutoFill flow. Possible alternatives I’m considering (open to feedback): designing the UX so that the extension opens the main app (only possible for Today widget in a supported way) which runs the NFC flow and stores/returns a short-lived assertion to the extension. Are any of these patterns sanctioned / recommended by Apple for credential providers?  Thanks — any pointers to docs, entitlement names, or example apps/samples would be extremely helpful.

Problem Description: Since Our USB hubs are capable of sending Vendor Defined Messages (VDMs) over a USB Type-C cable connection, they can programmatically place iOS, iPadOS, and macOS devices into DFU mode—without requiring any physical button interaction. Recently, we identified an issue when invoking DFU mode on an iPhone 15 using this method. Upon entering DFU mode, the device enumerates with USB Product ID 0x1881 (“Debug USB” – KIS interface). At that point, the deviceinterfaced daemon (launched by launchd) immediately detects the device and claims exclusive access to the USB interface. As a result, when our API Service attempts to communicate with the device through standard IOKit methods, it fails with the following error: 0xe00002c5 ((iokit/common) exclusive access and device already open) This prevents our libraries from reading the iBoot string (USB serial number string) that Apple devices normally expose in standard or recovery modes—information that includes ECID, CPID, CPRV, CPFM, BDID, and SCEP. This creates a significant barrier, as our API service becomes unable to perform subsequent device restoration operations as we missed the critical information. Request for Guidance: I’ve included the following context for your analysis and review. Using the launchctl unload command can temporarily stop it; however, I’d like to know if there’s an API-level mechanism to programmatically prevent deviceinterfaced from claiming access from within our API Service. Could you please advise on the following points? 1.  Managing deviceinterfaced Access • What is the proper way to stop or prevent deviceinterfaced from claiming exclusive access in this case, so that the API Service can read device information and starts restoring the device from that point? • Is there a recommended method or entitlement that allows third-party services to communicate with Apple devices while they are in Debug USB (KIS) mode? 2.  Guidelines and API Access • Are there any Apple-supported APIs or developer guidelines that would permit controlled access to the iBoot interface without conflicting with deviceinterfaced?

Since I updated my iPhone 13 to this new update I have two problems First: the battery discharges too fast or it gets stuck and doesn't discharge until I turn it off and turn it back on. Second: I see in my screen time a page that I had never seen is called imasdk.googleapis.com which I had never occupied and they tell me that it is a failure of the new update I hope you can help me fix that, since this mobile phone is new and already brings the faults by the ios

Im running macOS Tahoe and I have the proper nvram boot-args , however when I try to poke the log stream im not getting any verb information related to the card im using. The audio system im using is AppleHDA.kext from the Beta 1 KDK. I've tried asking AI it doesn't make a difference what it suggests to me..... In the meantime of while im asking for assistance what ill do is go ahead and let it template me a kernel extension that I guess just traffics it to the Log for me and hopefully this isn't filtered out as what I suspect is it saying is happening is is that it actually masks some of the information. Why am I doing this? not For the Linux Driver its so I can see from the Log where it came from as this is what the developer said he did GitHub/davidjo/snd_hda_macbookpro is the kabylake iMac.

I have an iOS/iPadOS app and 'm trying to communicate with usb smart card reader using CryptoTokenKit on all platforms (ios/ipados/macos). Minimal Repro Code import CryptoTokenKit import SwiftUI struct ContentView: View { @State var status = "" var body: some View { VStack { Text("Status: \(status)") } .padding() .onAppear { let manager = TKSmartCardSlotManager.default if manager != nil { status = "Initialized" } else { status = "Unsupported" } } } } And my entitlement file has only one key: com.apple.security.smartcard = YES Behavior • iPadOS (on device): status = "Initialized" ✅ • macOS (native macOS app, with the required CryptoTokenKit entitlement): status = "Initialized" ✅ • macOS (Designed for iPad, regardless of CryptoTokenKit entitlement): status = "Unsupported" → TKSmartCardSlotManager.default is nil ❌ Expectation Given that the same iPadOS build initializes TKSmartCardSlotManager, I expected the iPad app running in Designed for iPad mode on Apple silicon Mac to behave the same (or to have a documented limitation). Questions Is CryptoTokenKit (and specifically TKSmartCardSlotManager) supported for iPad apps running on Mac in Designed for iPad mode? If support exists, what entitlements / capabilities are required for USB smart-card access in this configuration? If not supported, is Mac Catalyst the correct/only path on macOS to access USB smart-card readers via CryptoTokenKit? Are there recommended alternatives for iPad apps on Mac (Designed for iPad) to communicate with USB smart-card readers (e.g., ExternalAccessory, DriverKit, etc.), or is this scenario intentionally unsupported? Thanks!

Hi, we have developed an application that streams data from two BLE peripherals at a rate of 14.5kbps per peripheral. Until now, our devices streamed in near real time with no lag on all Apple devices with Bluetooth 5.0 or greater. Since the release of the iPhone 17 series and the iPad A16, we have reports from users of the data being streamed at significantly lower rates than expected. Any help here would be greatly appreciated as our customers are being affected by this change.

Device: iPhone [model], iOS 18.6.2 Xcode: 16.0.x Team: Individual paid Apple Developer Program (not Personal Team), shows as my full name in Xcode I’m trying to use CoreNFC via NFCTagReaderSession in a small SwiftUI app (part of a larger project). So far I’ve done: • Enrolled in the Apple Developer Program (individual). • Confirmed that in Certificates, Identifiers & Profiles → Identifiers, my App ID for com.<…> has Near Field Communication Tag Reading enabled. • Created an iOS App Development provisioning profile for that App ID, including: • my Apple Development certificate • my iPhone device • Downloaded the profile, double-clicked it, and set it in Xcode under Signing & Capabilities with: • Team = my full-name team • “Automatically manage signing” off, using the custom profile. • Added the NFC Scan capability in Signing & Capabilities. • Added Privacy - NFC Scan Usage Description (NFCReaderUsageDescription) in Info.plist with a non-empty string. The app builds and runs on device. When I start the session: func beginScanning() { print("NFCTagReaderSession.readingAvailable =", NFCTagReaderSession.readingAvailable) session = NFCTagReaderSession(pollingOption: [.iso14443, .iso15693], delegate: self, queue: nil) session?.alertMessage = "Hold your iPhone near your Ori tag." session?.begin() } func tagReaderSession(_ session: NFCTagReaderSession, didInvalidateWithError error: Error) { print("NFC session invalidated:", error.localizedDescription) } readingAvailable is false, and I immediately see: NFC session invalidated: Session invalidated unexpectedly Earlier in this process I was seeing XPC sandbox messages like: Error Domain=NSCocoaErrorDomain Code=4099 "The connection to service named com.apple.nfcd.service.corenfc was invalidated: failed at lookup with error 159 - Sandbox restriction." Those went away after I created the explicit iOS App Development profile and pointed the target at it, but the session still invalidates right away and readingAvailable never becomes true. Safari can read NDEF URL tags on this device, so the NFC hardware is working. Question: Is there anything else required on the App ID / provisioning / team side to enable CoreNFC with NFCTagReaderSession for an individual (non-enterprise) developer account? Or any known issues where readingAvailable stays false even with NFC Tag Reading enabled and a custom iOS App Development profile? Any hints on what I might still be missing would be greatly appreciated.

We have an app that connects to an external device that we developed in-house that measures electroencephalography (EEG), as well as PPG and IMU. This is not a medical device and we have stated that many times but the app review process keeps rejecting the app for the same reason 1.4.1 - Safety physical harm because they say it is connecting to a medical device. We have submitted documentation for FCC certification for safety but we do not have FDA certification because it is not used for medical purposes - purely wellness. Despite several messages explaining it is not a medical device the response is always the same without actually addressing any of the supporting documents we have sent. Any help to find a way to explain to the Apple team that not all EEG devices are medical and in fact most are NOT FDA approved would be appreciated as it seems like whoever is reviewing the app doesn't understand that.