iOS 18.2, Swift, Xcode 16.2 I have a Core Data model with two entities - WarehouseArea (of which there is only one object) and StockReeipt (of which there are a couple of hundred thousand). Each StockReceipt must be linked to a WarehouseArea, and a WarehouseArea can be linked to zero, one or many StockReceipts. My problem is that when I create and add one more StockReceipt, the Core Data save takes over 3 seconds to complete. I don't understand why this is so slow. Saving the initial 200,000 StockReceipts only takes 5-6 seconds. When I enable SQL logging I can see that when the WarehouseArea attribute is being set on a StockReceipt, Core Data fetches all of the other StockReceipts (I don't know why) but that only takes 0.2 seconds and none of those StockReceipts are modified, so there shouldn't be any need to process them when saving the context. I have prepared a test project which can be found at https://github.com/DaleReilly/CoreDataSaveTester . Running the project will produce NSLog output showing the times before and after the slow save. Please help me understand what is going on in the background and tell me if there is any way I can speed this up?

My question Is there a way to perform an iCloud keychain reset in order to be able to test CKErrorUserDidResetEncryptedDataKey ? I found this section in the CloudKit documentation https://developer.apple.com/documentation/cloudkit/encrypting-user-data#Handle-a-User-Keychain-Reset I want to be prepared for the zoneNotFound / CKErrorUserDidResetEncryptedDataKey case. However, I can't find a way to actually reproduce this error with an iCloud (test-) user and can't find any Apple documentation on how to perform sucha "User Keychain Reset". The only thing that almost looked like it I came across was in the Keychain.app's Settings "Reset Default Keychains…". However, performing this didn't seem to affect the CloudKit data used in our App at all. I've been trying to do this with an Apple account that has 2FA active and a recovery account assigned. We're only targetting >= iOS 18, macOS >= 15.

Hello, I recently published an app that uses Swift Data as its primary data storage. The app uses concurrency, background threads, async await, and BLE communication. Sadly, I see my app incurs many fringe crashes, involving EXC_BAD_ACCESS, KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS, EXC_BREAKPOINT, etc. I followed these guidelines: One ModelContainer that is stored as a global variable and used throughout. ModelContexts are created separately for each task, changes are saved manually, and models are not passed around. Threads with different ModelContexts might manipulate and/or read the same data simultaneously. I was under the impression this meets the usage requirements. I suspect perhaps the issue lies in my usage of contexts in a single await function, that might be paused and resumed on a different thread (although same execution path). Is that the case? If so, how should SwiftData be used in async scopes? Is there anything else particularly wrong in my approach?

I'm developing a SwiftUI app using SwiftData and encountering a persistent issue: Error Message: Thread 1: Fatal error: Duplicate keys of type 'Bland' were found in a Dictionary. This usually means either that the type violates Hashable's requirements, or that members of such a dictionary were mutated after insertion. Details: Occurrence: The error always occurs on the first launch of the app after installation. Specifically, it happens approximately 1 minute after the app starts. Inconsistent Behavior: Despite no changes to the code or server data, the error occurs inconsistently. Data Fetching Process: I fetch data for entities (Bland, CrossZansu, and Trade) from the server using the following process: Fetch Bland and CrossZansu entities via URLSession. Insert or update these entities into the SwiftData context. The fetched data is managed as follows: func refleshBlandsData() async throws { if let blandsOnServer = try await DataModel.shared.getBlands() { await MainActor.run { blandsOnServer.forEach { blandOnServer in if let blandOnLocal = blandList.first(where: { $0.code == blandOnServer.code }) { blandOnLocal.update(serverBland: blandOnServer) } else { modelContext.insert(blandOnServer.bland) } } } } } This is a simplified version of my StockListView. The blandList is a @Query property and dynamically retrieves data from SwiftData: struct StockListView: View { @Environment(\.modelContext) private var modelContext @Query(sort: \Bland.sname) var blandList: [Bland] @Query var users: [User] @State private var isNotLoaded = true @State private var isLoading = false @State private var loadingErrorState = "" var body: some View { NavigationStack { List { ForEach(blandList, id: \.self) { bland in NavigationLink(value: bland) { Text(bland.sname) } } } .navigationTitle("Stock List") .onAppear { doIfFirst() } } } // This function handles data loading when the app launches for the first time func doIfFirst() { if isNotLoaded { loadDataWithAnimationIfNotLoading() isNotLoaded = false } } // This function ensures data is loaded with an animation and avoids multiple triggers func loadDataWithAnimationIfNotLoading() { if !isLoading { isLoading = true Task { do { try await loadData() } catch { // Capture and store any errors during data loading loadingErrorState = "Data load failed: \(error.localizedDescription)" } isLoading = false } } } // Fetch data from the server and insert it into the SwiftData model context func loadData() async throws { if let blandsOnServer = try await DataModel.shared.getBlands() { for bland in blandsOnServer { // Avoid inserting duplicate keys by checking for existing items in blandList if !blandList.contains(where: { $0.code == bland.code }) { modelContext.insert(bland.bland) } } } } } Entity Definitions: Here are the main entities involved: Bland: @Model class Bland: Identifiable { @Attribute(.unique) var code: String var sname: String @Relationship(deleteRule: .cascade, inverse: \CrossZansu.bland) var zansuList: [CrossZansu] @Relationship(deleteRule: .cascade, inverse: \Trade.bland) var trades: [Trade] } CrossZansu: @Model class CrossZansu: Equatable { @Attribute(.unique) var id: String var bland: Bland? } Trade: @Model class Trade { @Relationship(deleteRule: .nullify) var user: User? var bland: Bland } User: class User { var id: UUID @Relationship(deleteRule: .cascade, inverse: \Trade.user) var trades: [Trade] } Observations: Error Context: The error occurs after the data is fetched and inserted into SwiftData. This suggests an issue with Hashable requirements or duplicate keys being inserted unintentionally. Concurrency Concerns: The fetch and update operations are performed in asynchronous tasks. Could this cause race conditions? Questions: Could this issue be related to how @Relationship and @Attribute(.unique) are managed in SwiftData? What are potential pitfalls with Equatable implementations (e.g., in CrossZansu) when used in SwiftData entities? Are there any recommended approaches for debugging "Duplicate keys" errors in SwiftData? Additional Info: Error Timing: The error occurs only during the app's first launch and consistently within the first minute.

I get the following fatal error when the user clicks Save in AddProductionView. Fatal error: Duplicate keys of type 'AnyHashable' were found in a Dictionary. This usually means either that the type violates Hashable's requirements, or that members of such a dictionary were mutated after insertion. As far as I’m aware, SwiftData automatically makes its models conform to Hashable, so this shouldn’t be a problem. I think it has something to do with the picker, but for the life of me I can’t see what. This error occurs about 75% of the time when Save is clicked. I'm using Xcode 16.2 and iPhone SE 2nd Gen. Any help would be greatly appreciated… Here is my code: import SwiftUI import SwiftData @main struct MyApp: App { var body: some Scene { WindowGroup { ContentView() .modelContainer(for: Character.self, isAutosaveEnabled: false) } } } @Model final class Character { var name: String var production: Production var myCharacter: Bool init(name: String, production: Production, myCharacter: Bool = false) { self.name = name self.production = production self.myCharacter = myCharacter } } @Model final class Production { var name: String init(name: String) { self.name = name } } struct ContentView: View { @State private var showingSheet = false var body: some View { Button("Add", systemImage: "plus") { showingSheet.toggle() } .sheet(isPresented: $showingSheet) { AddProductionView() } } } struct AddProductionView: View { @Environment(\.dismiss) private var dismiss @Environment(\.modelContext) var modelContext @State var production = Production(name: "") @Query var characters: [Character] @State private var characterName: String = "" @State private var selectedCharacter: Character? var filteredCharacters: [Character] { characters.filter { $0.production == production } } var body: some View { NavigationStack { Form { Section("Details") { TextField("Title", text: $production.name) } Section("Characters") { List(filteredCharacters) { character in Text(character.name) } HStack { TextField("Character", text: $characterName) Button("Add") { let newCharacter = Character(name: characterName, production: production) modelContext.insert(newCharacter) characterName = "" } .disabled(characterName.isEmpty) } if !filteredCharacters.isEmpty { Picker("Select your role", selection: $selectedCharacter) { Text("Select") .tag(nil as Character?) ForEach(filteredCharacters) { character in Text(character.name) .tag(character as Character?) } } .pickerStyle(.menu) } } } .toolbar { Button("Save") { //Fatal error: Duplicate keys of type 'AnyHashable' were found in a Dictionary. This usually means either that the type violates Hashable's requirements, or that members of such a dictionary were mutated after insertion. if let selectedCharacter = selectedCharacter { selectedCharacter.myCharacter = true } modelContext.insert(production) do { try modelContext.save() } catch { print("Failed to save context: \(error)") } dismiss() } .disabled(production.name.isEmpty || selectedCharacter == nil) } } } }

I get this message when trying to save my Models. CoreData: error: SQLCore dispatchRequest: exception handling request: <NSSQLSaveChangesRequestContext: 0x303034540> , I/O error for database at /var/mobile/Containers/Data/Application/726ECA8C-6C67-4BFE-89E7-AFD8A83CAA5D/Library/Application Support/default.store. SQLite error code:1, 'no such table: ZCALENDARMODEL' with userInfo of { NSFilePath = "/var/mobile/Containers/Data/Application/726ECA8C-6C67-4BFE-89E7-AFD8A83CAA5D/Library/Application Support/default.store"; NSSQLiteErrorDomain = 1; } SwiftData.DefaultStore save failed with error: Error Domain=NSCocoaErrorDomain Code=256 "The file “default.store” couldn’t be opened." UserInfo={NSFilePath=/var/mobile/Containers/Data/Application/726ECA8C-6C67-4BFE-89E7-AFD8A83CAA5D/Library/Application Support/default.store, NSSQLiteErrorDomain=1} The App has Recipes and Calendars and the user can select a Recipe for each Calendar day. The recipe should not be referenced, it should be saved by SwiftData along with the Calendar. import SwiftUI import SwiftData enum CalendarSource: String, Codable { case created case imported } @Model class CalendarModel: Identifiable, Codable { var id: UUID = UUID() var name: String var startDate: Date var endDate: Date var recipes: [String: RecipeData] = [:] var thumbnailData: Data? var source: CalendarSource? // Computed Properties var daysBetween: Int { let days = Calendar.current.dateComponents([.day], from: startDate.midnight, to: endDate.midnight).day ?? 0 return days + 1 } var allDates: [Date] { startDate.midnight.allDates(upTo: endDate.midnight) } var thumbnailImage: Image? { if let data = thumbnailData, let uiImage = UIImage(data: data) { return Image(uiImage: uiImage) } else { return nil } } // Initializer init(name: String, startDate: Date, endDate: Date, thumbnailData: Data? = nil, source: CalendarSource? = .created) { self.name = name self.startDate = startDate self.endDate = endDate self.thumbnailData = thumbnailData self.source = source } // Convenience initializer to create a copy of an existing calendar static func copy(from calendar: CalendarModel) -> CalendarModel { let copiedCalendar = CalendarModel( name: calendar.name, startDate: calendar.startDate, endDate: calendar.endDate, thumbnailData: calendar.thumbnailData, source: calendar.source ) // Copy recipes copiedCalendar.recipes = calendar.recipes.mapValues { $0 } return copiedCalendar } // Codable Conformance private enum CodingKeys: String, CodingKey { case id, name, startDate, endDate, recipes, thumbnailData, source } required init(from decoder: Decoder) throws { let container = try decoder.container(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self) id = try container.decode(UUID.self, forKey: .id) name = try container.decode(String.self, forKey: .name) startDate = try container.decode(Date.self, forKey: .startDate) endDate = try container.decode(Date.self, forKey: .endDate) recipes = try container.decode([String: RecipeData].self, forKey: .recipes) thumbnailData = try container.decodeIfPresent(Data.self, forKey: .thumbnailData) source = try container.decodeIfPresent(CalendarSource.self, forKey: .source) } func encode(to encoder: Encoder) throws { var container = encoder.container(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self) try container.encode(id, forKey: .id) try container.encode(name, forKey: .name) try container.encode(startDate, forKey: .startDate) try container.encode(endDate, forKey: .endDate) try container.encode(recipes, forKey: .recipes) try container.encode(thumbnailData, forKey: .thumbnailData) try container.encode(source, forKey: .source) } } import SwiftUI struct RecipeData: Codable, Identifiable { var id: UUID = UUID() var name: String var ingredients: String var steps: String var thumbnailData: Data? // Computed property to convert thumbnail data to a SwiftUI Image var thumbnailImage: Image? { if let data = thumbnailData, let uiImage = UIImage(data: data) { return Image(uiImage: uiImage) } else { return nil // No image } } init(recipe: RecipeModel) { self.name = recipe.name self.ingredients = recipe.ingredients self.steps = recipe.steps self.thumbnailData = recipe.thumbnailData } } import SwiftUI import SwiftData @Model class RecipeModel: Identifiable, Codable { var id: UUID = UUID() var name: String var ingredients: String var steps: String var thumbnailData: Data? // Store the image data for the thumbnail static let fallbackSymbols = ["book.pages.fill", "carrot.fill", "fork.knife", "stove.fill"] // Computed property to convert thumbnail data to a SwiftUI Image var thumbnailImage: Image? { if let data = thumbnailData, let uiImage = UIImage(data: data) { return Image(uiImage: uiImage) } else { return nil // No image } } // MARK: - Initializer init(name: String, ingredients: String = "", steps: String = "", thumbnailData: Data? = nil) { self.name = name self.ingredients = ingredients self.steps = steps self.thumbnailData = thumbnailData } // MARK: - Copy Function func copy() -> RecipeModel { RecipeModel( name: self.name, ingredients: self.ingredients, steps: self.steps, thumbnailData: self.thumbnailData ) } // MARK: - Codable Conformance private enum CodingKeys: String, CodingKey { case id, name, ingredients, steps, thumbnailData } required init(from decoder: Decoder) throws { ... } func encode(to encoder: Encoder) throws { var container = encoder.container(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self) try container.encode(id, forKey: .id) try container.encode(name, forKey: .name) try container.encode(ingredients, forKey: .ingredients) try container.encode(steps, forKey: .steps) try container.encode(thumbnailData, forKey: .thumbnailData) } }

SwiftData delete isn't working, when I attempt to delete a model, my app crashes and I get the following error: SwiftData/PersistentModel.swift:359: Fatal error: Cannot remove My_App.Model2 from relationship Relationship - name: model2, options: [], valueType: Model2, destination: Model2, inverseName: models3, inverseKeypath: Optional(\Model2.models3) on My_App.Model3 because an appropriate default value is not configured. I get that it's saying I don't have a default value, but why do I need one? Isn't @Relationship .cascade automatically deleting the associated models? And onto of that, why is the error occurring within the do block, shouldn't it be caught by the catch, and printed? I have put together a sample project below. import SwiftUI import SwiftData @main struct MyApp: App { var body: some Scene { WindowGroup { ContentView() .modelContainer(for: Model3.self) } } } @Model class Model1 { var name: String @Relationship(deleteRule: .cascade, inverse: \Model2.model1) var models2: [Model2] = [] init(name: String) { self.name = name } } @Model class Model2 { var name: String var model1: Model1 @Relationship(deleteRule: .cascade, inverse: \Model3.model2) var models3: [Model3] = [] init(name: String, model1: Model1) { self.name = name self.model1 = model1 } } @Model class Model3 { var name: String var model2: Model2 init(name: String, model2: Model2) { self.name = name self.model2 = model2 } } struct ContentView: View { @Query var models1: [Model1] @Environment(\.modelContext) var modelContext var body: some View { NavigationStack { List(models1) { model1 in Text(model1.name) .swipeActions { Button("Delete", systemImage: "trash", role: .destructive) { modelContext.delete(model1) do { try modelContext.save() //SwiftData/PersistentModel.swift:359: Fatal error: Cannot remove My_App.Model2 from relationship Relationship - name: model2, options: [], valueType: Model2, destination: Model2, inverseName: models3, inverseKeypath: Optional(\Model2.models3) on My_App.Model3 because an appropriate default value is not configured. } catch { print(error.localizedDescription) } } } } .toolbar { Button("Insert", systemImage: "plus") { modelContext.insert(Model3(name: "model3", model2: Model2(name: "model2", model1: Model1(name: "model1")))) } } } } }

I'm using SwiftData with CloudKit and have been trying to migrate from SchemaV1 to SchemaV2, but it seems reducing the Entities crashes my app. // Example of migrating from V1 to V2 // Dropping `Person` because it's no longer needed do { // SchemaV1: Person.self, Author.self // SchemaV2: Author.self let schema = Schema(versionedSchema: SchemaV2.self) return try ModelContainer( for: schema, migrationPlan: AppSchemaMigrationPlan.self, configurations: ModelConfiguration( cloudKitDatabase: .automatic) ) } catch { fatalError("Could not create ModelContainer: \(error)") } Is it possible to drop Entities in the Schema Migration Plan? How can I delete the Person model from my Schema and CloudKit?

I am attempting to migrate a cloudkit module that calls on manual cloudkit methods for fetching record zone changes, modifying records, etc to one that utilizes CKSyncEngine. I've got a basic implementation working with just a create method for one of my data models, however it seems like the sync engine keeps calling sync events on the same pending changes. Here is my current flow: The user will hit some button that lets them fill out a form to create a data model. The user saves the form. This triggers a method that takes the resulting data model and queues it to the sync engine's state (engine.state.add(pendingRecordZoneChanges: pendingChanges) I have my delegate method nextRecordZoneChangeBatch(_ context:...) implemented where it fetches the corresponding data model using the record ID and returns a batch containing the corresponding populated record from the data model. I have the handleEvent(_ event:...) delegate method implemented where I handle both .fetchRecordZoneChanges and .sentRecordZoneChanges. I have set up .sentRecordZoneChanges to merge the server record into my local record (and persisted locally) so that the record change tags are the same. After this last portion, it seems that the sync engine continues to keep pushing syncs/updates and I end up with numerous handleEvent(_ event:) calls that keep returning savedRecords (and occasionally failedRecordSaves). Am I missing some step to remove the record from the changes after the sync engine recognizes that I have properly saved the record to the server?

After updating to 15.2 I am seeing frequent crashes in my in-development app related to SwiftData. For instance, I have a 100% reproducible crash when I make the app lose and regain focus. There is also a crash that seem to be triggered by a modelContext.save() call in one of my ModelActors. With both of these crashes, the issue seems to be around keeping SwiftData models up to date. The first item in the stacktrace that is not machinecode is always some getter on a SwiftData collection or object. In the console, these crashes are accompanied by output along the lines of: === AttributeGraph: cycle detected through attribute 820680 === precondition failure: setting value during update: 930592 error: the replacement path doesn't exist: "/var/folders/b7/0dw7ztp13fgfxlj19by851tw0000gn/T/swift-generated-sources/@__swiftmacro_10SpaceDebug8TodoListV5todos33_5575DE008494C519BB9FA49C405133E1LL5QueryfMa_.swift" error: the replacement path doesn't exist: "/var/folders/b7/0dw7ztp13fgfxlj19by851tw0000gn/T/swift-generated-sources/@__swiftmacro_10SpaceDebug8TodoListV5todos33_5575DE008494C519BB9FA49C405133E1LL5QueryfMa_.swift" Can't show file for stack frame : <DBGLLDBStackFrame: 0x35a57c4e0> - stackNumber:27 - name:TodoList.todos.getter. The file path does not exist on the file system: /var/folders/b7/0dw7ztp13fgfxlj19by851tw0000gn/T/swift-generated-sources/@__swiftmacro_10SpaceDebug8TodoListV5todos33_5575DE008494C519BB9FA49C405133E1LL5QueryfMa_.swiftCan't show file for stack frame : <DBGLLDBStackFrame: 0x35a57c4e0> - stackNumber:27 - name:TodoList.todos.getter. The file path does not exist on the file system: /var/folders/b7/0dw7ztp13fgfxlj19by851tw0000gn/T/swift-generated-sources/@__swiftmacro_10SpaceDebug8TodoListV5todos33_5575DE008494C519BB9FA49C405133E1LL5QueryfMa_.swiftCan't show file for stack frame : <DBGLLDBStackFrame: 0x35a5a82f0> - stackNumber:62 - name:TodoList.todos.getter. The file path does not exist on the file system: /var/folders/b7/0dw7ztp13fgfxlj19by851tw0000gn/T/swift-generated-sources/@__swiftmacro_10SpaceDebug8TodoListV5todos33_5575DE008494C519BB9FA49C405133E1LL5QueryfMa_.swift Has anyone run into something similar? I'm looking for suggestions on how to debug this. Cheers, Bastiaan

Hi there We're using CloudKit in our app which, generally, syncs data perfectly between devices. However, recently the sync has stopped working (some changes will never sync and the sync is delayed for several days even with the app open on all devices). CloudKit's logs show the error „You can't save and delete the same record" and „Already have a mirrored relationship registered for this key", etc. We’ve a hunch that this issue is related to a mirrored relationship of one database entity. Our scenario: We've subclassed the database entities. The database model (which we can't share publicly) contains mirrored relationships. We store very long texts in the database (similar to a Word document that contains markup data – in case that’s relevant). Deleting all data and starting with a completely new container and bundle identifier didn’t help (we tried that multiple times). This issue occurs on macOS (15.2（24C101) as well on iOS (18.2). Any hints on how to get the sync working again? Should we simply avoid mirrored relationships? Many thanks

Hey, For some reason I see crashes for my iOS app related to CloudKit entitlements. The crash happens on start up and it says: "CKException - Application has malformed entitlements. Found value "*" for entitlement com.apple.developer.icloud-services, expected an array of strings" I have checked my entitlements of the same build on App Store Connect and it shows "com.apple.developer.icloud-services: ( "CloudKit" )" So I am not sure why users are having this issue. I haven't been able to reproduce it. Does anyone have any idea why this is happening? Thanks

My app has been in the App Store a few months. In that time I've added a few updates to my SwiftData schema using a MigrationPlan, and things were seemingly going ok. But then I decided to add CloudKit syncing. I needed to modify my models to be compatible. So, I added another migration stage for it, changed the properties as needed (making things optional or adding default values, etc.). In my tests, everything seemed to work smoothly updating from the previous version to the new version with CloudKit. So I released it to my users. But, that's when I started to see the crashes and error reports come in. I think I've narrowed it down to when users update from older versions of the app. I was finally able to reproduce this on my end, and Core Data is throwing an error when loading the ModelContainer saying "CloudKit integration requires that all attributes be optional, or have a default value set." Even though I did this in the latest schema. It’s like it’s trying to load CloudKit before performing the schema migration, and since it can’t, it just fails and won’t load anything. I’m kinda at a loss how to recover from this for these users other than tell them to delete their app and restart, but obviously they’ll lose their data that way. The only other idea I have is to setup some older builds on TestFlight and direct them to update to those first, then update to the newest production version and hope that solves it. Any other ideas? And what can I do to prevent this for future users who maybe reinstall the app from an older version too? There's nothing special about my code for loading the ModelContainer. Just a basic: let container = try ModelContainer( for: Foo.self, Bar.self, migrationPlan: SchemaMigration.self, configurations: ModelConfiguration(cloudKitDatabase: .automatic) )

relationshipKeyPathsForPrefetching in SwiftData does not seem to work here when scrolling down the list. Why? I would like all categories to be fetched while posts are fetched - not while scrolling down the list. struct ContentView: View { var body: some View { QueryList( fetchDescriptor: withCategoriesFetchDescriptor ) } var withCategoriesFetchDescriptor: FetchDescriptor<Post> { var fetchDescriptor = FetchDescriptor<Post>() fetchDescriptor.relationshipKeyPathsForPrefetching = [\.category] return fetchDescriptor } } struct QueryList: View { @Query var posts: [Post] init(fetchDescriptor: FetchDescriptor<Post>) { _posts = Query(fetchDescriptor) } var body: some View { List(posts) { post in VStack { Text(post.title) Text(post.category?.name ?? "") .font(.footnote) } } } } @Model final class Post { var title: String var category: Category? init(title: String) { self.title = title } } @Model final class Category { var name: String init(name: String) { self.name = name } }

I am trying to read and write a text file from an App written in Swift in XCode directly to the "iCloud Drive" folder in Files on the iPhone. The app worked readlly reading and writing to the Documents folder in the App container, and then readily to the "On My iPhone" folder in Files after adding 2 lines to the plist that I found in a search online. But I have been unable to get to the iCloud Drive folder. I found an item called "Enabling Document Storage in iCloud Drive" in "iCloud Design Guide" with additional plist entries that states "These settings allow iCloud Drive to provide public access to the files stored in your app’s container": NSUbiquitousContainers iCloud.com.example.MyApp NSUbiquitousContainerIsDocumentScopePublic NSUbiquitousContainerSupportedFolderLevels Any NSUbiquitousContainerName MyApp I think I changed the MyApp items appropriately. I have enabled iCloud in my App and the XCode General, and Signing entries. But this does not work. There are no error messages and no "Steps" shown in the "Capabilities" entry in Xcode. A little help? :-)

In a CloudKit private database, the Owner creates a custom zone and performs the following actions: Creates CKRecord1 with CKShare1 and invites Participant1 to it. Creates CKRecord2 with CKShare2 and invites Participant2 to it. Creates CKRecordShared, which should be accessible to both Participant1 and Participant2. How can I achieve step 3? I observed that: Setting a regular reference from CKRecord1 (or CKRecord2) to CKRecordShared does not automatically make CKRecordShared accessible to Participant1 (or Participant2). CKRecordShared can only have one parent, so it cannot be directly linked via parent reference to both Participant1 and Participant2 at the same time. One potential solution I see is to have the Owner create a separate CKShare for CKRecordShared and share it explicitly with each participant. However, this approach could lead to user errors, as it requires careful management of multiple shares for each participant. Is there a better way to handle this scenario, ensuring that CKRecordShared is accessible to multiple participants without introducing unnecessary complexity or potential errors?

Hi, I've been using Core Data + CloudKit via NSPersistentCloudKitContainer for several years now. Back then I just created my Core Data AND CloudKit fields by hand. Now the time has come for a little lightweight migration to a new Core Data model, let's say I just needed to add one String attribute. So I've done the Core Data local migration as usual, then added this to container code: try? persistentContainer.initializeCloudKitSchema(options: NSPersistentCloudKitContainerSchemaInitializationOptions()) Run. And everything worked great. but… Now I've noticed that CloudKit created new CKAsset fields for each String attribute that I had in Core Data (about 5 new CKAsset fields). Is this normal!? Why? ! Is it safe to deploy these changes to prod? ty. ChatGPT said: "This field is used internally by CloudKit to handle large string values. If the string value is small enough, it is stored in the normal String field, but if it exceeds the size limit (about 1KB), the string is automatically stored as a CKAsset."

why not working?

Something I want to know and all users of CKSyncEngine care about I'm going to build a full stack solution using CKSyncEngine, but what's the near future and the support and maintenance priorities inside Apple for CKSyncEngine? There is only one short video for CKSyncEngine, in 2023, no updates after that, no future plans mentioned. I'm worried that this technology be deprecated or not activity maintained. This is a complex technology, without being activity maintained (or open-sourced) there will be fatal production issues we the developer cannot solve. The CK developer in the video stated that "many apps" were using the framework, but he did not list any. The only named is NSUbiquitousKeyValueStore, but NSUbiquitousKeyValueStore is too simple a use case. I wonder is apple's Notes.app using it, or going to use it? Is SwiftData using it? API Problems The API design seems a little bit tricky, not designed from a user's perspective. handleEvent doesn't contain any context information about which batch. How do I react the event properly? Let's say our sync code and CKSyncEngine, and callbacks are all on a dedicated thread. Consider this: in nextRecordZoneChangeBatch you provided a batch of changes, let's call this BATCH 1, including an item in database with uuid "***" and name "yyy" before the changes are uploaded, there are new changes from many OTHER BACKGROUND THREADS made to the database. item "***"'s name is now "zzz" handle SentRecordZoneChanges event: I get records that uploaded or failed, but I don't know which BATCH the records belong to. How do I decide if i have to mark "***" as finished uploading or not? If I mark *** as finished that's wrong, the new name "zzz" is not uploaded. I have to compare every field of *** with the savedRecord to decide if I finished uploading or not? That is not acceptable as the performance and memory will be bad. Other questions I have to add recordIDs to state, and wait for the engine to react. I don't think this is a good idea, because recordID is a CloudKit concept, and what I want to sync is a local database. I don't see any rational for this, or not documented. If the engine is going to ask for a batch of records, you can get all record ids from the batch?

In Apple Numbers and similar apps, a user can save a document to iCloud Drive, and collaborate with other users. From what I can gather, it seems to use two mechanisms: the document as a whole is synced via iCloud Drive, but when a collaboration is started, it seems to use CloudKit records to do live updates. I am working on a similar app, that saves documents to iCloud Drive (on Mac, iPad, and iPhone). Currently it only syncs via iCloud Drive, re-reading the entire (often large) document when a remote change occurs. This can lead to a delay of several seconds (up to a minute) for the document to be saved, synced to the server, synced from the server, and re-read. I'm working on adding a "live sync", i.e. the ability to see changes in as near to real-time as feasible, like in Apple's apps. The document as a whole will remain syncing via iCloud Drive. My thought is to add a CloudKit CKRecord-based sync when two or more users are collaborating on a document, recording only the diffs for quick updates. The app would no longer re-read the entire document when iCloud Drive updates it while in use, and would instead read the CloudKit records and apply those changes. This should be much faster. Is my understanding of how Apple does it correct? Does my proposed approach seem sensible? Has anyone else implemented something like this, with iCloud Drive-based documents and a CloudKit live sync? In terms of technologies, I see that Apple now has a Shared with You framework, with the ability to use a NSItemProvider to start the collaboration. Which raises the question, should I use the iCloud Drive document for the collaboration (as I do now), or the CloudKit CKShare diff? I think I'd have to use the document as a whole, both so it works with the Send Copy option, and so a user that doesn't have the document gets it when using Collaborate. Once the collaboration is underway, I'd want to start the CloudKit channel. So I guess I'd save the CKShare to the server, get its URL, and save that in the document, so another user can read that URL as part of their initial load of the document from iCloud Drive? Once two (or more) users have the document via iCloud Drive, and the CKShare via the embedded URL, I should be able to do further live-sync updates via CloudKit. If a user closes the document and re-opens it, they'd get the updates via iCloud Drive, so no need to apply any updates from before the document was opened. Does all this sound reasonable, or am I overlooking some gotcha? I'd appreciate any advice from people who have experience with this kind of syncing.