Im having trouble enabling Live Activities in a new app. The option is not available in Xcode or in the developer portal. Is there something I have to do to activate this option?

Hello, I'm trying to create a widget using the WidgetKit framework. In this part, I'm using Intents along with a DynamicOptionsProvider. As shown in the Medium article below, I want to present multiple options when "Edit Widget" is tapped: https://levelup.gitconnected.com/swiftui-configurable-widget-to-let-our-user-choose-4a54e398f42f However, in this example, the options are provided statically. What I want to achieve is to display a list of devices based on the selected HomeId after the user selects a Home. I’ve set up the interface accordingly, but when I select a Home, the device list does not update. How can I make this work? The two options should be dependent on each other.

We are currently using Live Activities in our app and supporting both of the following use cases: Starting a Live Activity directly from the app using ActivityKit APIs. Starting a Live Activity from the backend using the start token. In the first case (initiated from the app), the OS generates an update token, and we are able to continuously update the Live Activity via our backend—even if the user has not explicitly provided "Allow" or "Always Allow" consent from the lock screen. This works as expected. In the second case (initiated from the backend), if the user does provide consent ("Allow" or "Always Allow") from the lock screen, we receive the update token and can continue updating the Live Activity. However, if the user does not provide consent, the OS does not provide the update token, and we are unable to send further updates. Question: Is it possible to receive the update token from the OS when the Live Activity is started from the backend, without the user explicitly providing "Allow" or "Always Allow" consent from the lock screen? We would appreciate any clarification or official documentation related to this behavior. Thank you!

Just wanted to clarify some expected behaviors here. It seems that there are two distinct behaviors for Live Activity flows for freshly installed apps. When you start a Live Activity for the first time and the user hasn't yet clicked on Allow/Don't Allow in the activity interface, there are two different sequences: Starting a Live Activity locally Request a Live Activity locally via Swift Live Activity starts .pushTokenUpdates is immediately triggered, even if the Allow/Don't Allow buttons appear under the Activity UI Starting a Live Activity via push-to-start Send a push-to-start notification to launch a Live Activity Live Activity starts .pushTokenUpdates is not triggered, and .pushToken returns nil. If a user clicks on Allow in the Activity UI, only then is .pushTokenUpdates triggered.

There seems to be a long running issue with WidgetKit where some users don't see the widget when trying to add to their Home Screen. (even after opening the app for the first time). I have been able to reproduce myself intermittently, and typically restarting the phone or re-installing the app fixes the problem. However, some of my users have encountered this and end up requesting refunds because they think the app is broken. Has anybody else experienced this issue? Would be great to get this bug resolved as it's frustrating for users.

In our widget we include a button with an intent, making a network call to refresh some shared data in its perform(). Whether the call finishes in time or not is not important to us, what matters more is that the widget gets reloaded at the end and displays whatever data it has available with its transition animation. On iOS18.0 we see the widget being reloaded but on the latest version 18.4 this doesn't happen anymore. Going through the logs, on both devices we see this same flow: default 2025-04-10 15:05:26.853674 +0300 WidgetRenderer_Default Evaluating dispatch of UIEvent: 0x300e002a0; type: 0; subtype: 0; backing type: 11; shouldSend: 1; ignoreInteractionEvents: 0, systemGestureStateChange: 0 default 2025-04-10 15:05:26.853691 +0300 WidgetRenderer_Default Sending UIEvent type: 0; subtype: 0; to windows: 1 default 2025-04-10 15:05:26.853702 +0300 WidgetRenderer_Default Sending UIEvent type: 0; subtype: 0; to window: <WidgetRenderer.WidgetWindow: 0x5689b4000>; contextId: 0x8E401B8A default 2025-04-10 15:05:26.853735 +0300 SpringBoard Evaluating dispatch of UIEvent: 0x300af9420; type: 0; subtype: 0; backing type: 11; shouldSend: 1; ignoreInteractionEvents: 0, systemGestureStateChange: 0 default 2025-04-10 15:05:26.853836 +0300 SpringBoard Sending UIEvent type: 0; subtype: 0; to windows: 1 default 2025-04-10 15:05:26.853864 +0300 SpringBoard Sending UIEvent type: 0; subtype: 0; to window: <_UISystemGestureWindow: 0xb5a20d000>; contextId: 0x5A4C4C23 default 2025-04-10 15:05:26.854862 +0300 SpringBoard Evaluating dispatch of UIEvent: 0x300aeeca0; type: 0; subtype: 0; backing type: 11; shouldSend: 1; ignoreInteractionEvents: 0, systemGestureStateChange: 0 default 2025-04-10 15:05:26.854866 +0300 WidgetRenderer_Default [Timeline[<edited-bundle-identifier>::<edited-bundle-identifier>.<Widget>:widget:systemMedium::321.00/148.00/20.20:(null)]--A76785AED3F9::0xb5bc4c000)] Handle action default 2025-04-10 15:05:26.854892 +0300 SpringBoard Sending UIEvent type: 0; subtype: 0; to windows: 1 default 2025-04-10 15:05:26.854901 +0300 SpringBoard Sending UIEvent type: 0; subtype: 0; to window: <SBHomeScreenWindow: 0xb5ad60000>; contextId: 0x71D69FA2 default 2025-04-10 15:05:26.855015 +0300 WidgetRenderer_Default Handle action: <private> default 2025-04-10 15:05:26.855360 +0300 SpringBoard Allowing tap for icon view '<private>' default 2025-04-10 15:05:26.855376 +0300 SpringBoard Not allowing tap gesture to begin because we're not editing, the custom view controller's user interaction is enabled, and the effective icon alpha isn't zero. default 2025-04-10 15:05:26.856940 +0300 SpringBoard Icon touch ended: <private> default 2025-04-10 15:05:26.857474 +0300 backboardd contact 1 presence: none default 2025-04-10 15:05:26.857826 +0300 chronod Received action <private> for interaction <WidgetRenderSession--4632871937259503361-scene::C1F20222-CC99-45CC-B074-A76785AED3F9::0xb5bc4c000-[<edited-bundle-identifier>::<edited-bundle-identifier>.<Widget>:widget:systemMedium::321.00/148.00/20.20:(null)]> default 2025-04-10 15:05:26.858381 +0300 chronod [<WidgetRenderSession--4632871937259503361-scene::C1F20222-CC99-45CC-B074-A76785AED3F9::0xb5bc4c000-[<edited-bundle-identifier>::<edited-bundle-identifier>.<Widget>:widget:systemMedium::321.00/148.00/20.20:(null)]>] Handle interaction: <private> default 2025-04-10 15:05:26.858436 +0300 chronod Pausing reloads for: [<edited-bundle-identifier>::<edited-bundle-identifier>.<Widget>:widget] default 2025-04-10 15:05:26.869525 +0300 chronod [0xd180b2440] activating connection: mach=true listener=false peer=false name=com.apple.linkd.registry default 2025-04-10 15:05:26.870054 +0300 WidgetRenderer_Default Evaluating dispatch of UIEvent: 0x300e002a0; type: 0; subtype: 0; backing type: 11; shouldSend: 0; ignoreInteractionEvents: 0, systemGestureStateChange: 0 default 2025-04-10 15:05:26.870124 +0300 SpringBoard Evaluating dispatch of UIEvent: 0x300af9420; type: 0; subtype: 0; backing type: 11; shouldSend: 0; ignoreInteractionEvents: 0, systemGestureStateChange: 0 default 2025-04-10 15:05:26.870198 +0300 SpringBoard Evaluating dispatch of UIEvent: 0x300aeeca0; type: 0; subtype: 0; backing type: 11; shouldSend: 0; ignoreInteractionEvents: 0, systemGestureStateChange: 0 default 2025-04-10 15:05:26.871831 +0300 linkd Accepting XPC connection from PID 129 for service "com.apple.linkd.registry" default 2025-04-10 15:05:26.871840 +0300 linkd [0x410cbe6c0] activating connection: mach=false listener=false peer=true name=com.apple.linkd.registry.peer[129].0x410cbe6c0 info 2025-04-10 15:05:26.876032 +0300 chronod Client requested ( "<LNFullyQualifiedActionIdentifier: 0xd17321b40, bundleIdentifier: <edited-bundle-identifier>, actionIdentifier: ReloadBalanceIntent>" ), got { } default 2025-04-10 15:05:26.877178 +0300 chronod [0xd180b2440] invalidated because the current process cancelled the connection by calling xpc_connection_cancel() default 2025-04-10 15:05:26.877377 +0300 linkd [0x410cbe6c0] invalidated because the client process (pid 129) either cancelled the connection or exited Then it followa with this on iOS18.4 : error 2025-04-10 15:21:32.964920 +0300 chronod [<WidgetRenderSession-7817322460413849944-scene::B5E4D7C4-91E1-4656-8175-C3C3C1CB894D::0xc733b8000-[<edited-bundle-identifier>::<edited-bundle-identifier>.<Widget>:widget:systemLarge::364.00/382.00/23.00:(null)~(null)]>] Encountered error when handling interaction: ChronoKit.InteractiveWidgetActionRunner.Errors.runnerClientError(Error Domain=WFLinkActionWorkflowRunnerClientErrorDomain Code=1 "There is no metadata for ReloadBalanceIntent in `<edited-bundle-identifier>`" UserInfo={NSLocalizedDescription=There is no metadata for ReloadBalanceIntent in `<edited-bundle-identifier>`}) default 2025-04-10 15:21:32.964958 +0300 chronod [<edited-bundle-identifier>::<edited-bundle-identifier>.<Widget>:widget] Resuming reloads. Reload state paused -> clean info 2025-04-10 15:21:32.965013 +0300 chronod [interactionFailed] All diagnostics are disabled. Whereas on iOS18.0 it follows with a simplified error: error 2025-04-10 15:05:26.879005 +0300 chronod [<WidgetRenderSession--4632871937259503361-scene::C1F20222-CC99-45CC-B074-A76785AED3F9::0xb5bc4c000-[<edited-bundle-identifier>::<edited-bundle-identifier>.<Widget>:widget:systemMedium::321.00/148.00/20.20:(null)]>] Encountered error when handling interaction: Error Domain=ChronoKit.InteractiveWidgetActionRunner.Errors Code=1 default 2025-04-10 15:05:26.879065 +0300 chronod Resuming reloads for: [<edited-bundle-identifier>::<edited-bundle-identifier>.<Widget>:widget] but afterwards we see many lines describing the reload process. So it turns out that the intent fails(?) to execute on both OSes but iOS18.0 triggers a reload even so, which fits our purposes. What could the issue be? The intent is pretty standard, it contains only the title, localizedDescription and is defined only inside the widget.

I am experiencing an issue with my watchOS app. My application updates a shared file, accessible by both the main app and the WidgetKit extension, during a WatchConnectivity background task. Following this update, I call reloadAllTimelines(). This functionality worked as expected on watchOS 10, even without Developer Mode enabled. However, after updating my device to watchOS 11.5, this API appears to be broken. My reasons for believing this API is broken are threefold: The functionality worked reliably on watchOS 10. On watchOS 11.5, enabling "WidgetKit Developer Mode" (found under Settings > Developer) resolves the issue, and my complications update correctly. When I enter watch face edit mode, the snapshot/preview displayed (which utilizes the same underlying logic as the timeline API) shows the correct data. This indicates that the data has been successfully received from the phone, and the widget is indeed reading the updated shared file. Despite this, the actual widget view during its resting phase never updates. It's worth noting that TimelineReloadPolicy functions as expected, but I cannot rely on this for my use case. My widget requires immediate updates upon receiving new data. Apple, please investigate this behavior.

New features in WatchOS 26 with configurable widgets make it more important than ever that apps adopt IntentConfiguration options where applicable. I develop an app with an Apple Watch complication/widget on many many user's Watch faces around the world. I've completed updating my code to support WidgetKit and remove ClockKit. However, I face huge issues adding support for users to configure their widget/complications. If I update a widget to go from StaticConfiguration to IntentConfiguration, even when keeping the "kind" string the same, the widget disappears from the Watch face. This is an unacceptable user experience meaning I can't proceed with the migration. The problem is users will expect me to offer configuration in the Watch face soon for their widget/complication. Currently this process is done in a sub-optimal way in the app itself. A similar issue exists on iOS where the widget will just "freeze" indefinitely is migrated. This issue still occurs on the iOS 26 and WatchOS 26 betas. So how to move this forward. This has been discussed previously here: https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/661247 I've mentioned it at WidgetKit labs I've filed feedback last year: FB13880020 I've filed feedback this year: FB18180368 It seems really important this gets fixed for developers to adopt these new features, is there any other migration route I'm missing or a workaround that would mitigate this seemingly big problem.

I have start new live activity with push notifications,but sometimes this code"activity.pushTokenUpdates" can not callback to me,so I can't update the activity with push notifications. And I already click “Allow” button in my live activity widget.How can I solve this problem. Here are my code： fileprivate func observeLiveActivityForRemoteCreate() { // obverser pushToStartToken Task { if #available(iOS 17.2, *) { var beforeToken = "" for await pushToken in Activity<HLPlatformActivityAttributes>.pushToStartTokenUpdates { let pushTokenStr = pushToken.map{String(format: "%02.2hhx", arguments: [$0])}.joined() // avoid send duplication if beforeToken == pushTokenStr { return } beforeToken = pushTokenStr // send pushToStartToken to service await HLPlatformLiveActivityBridge.registerLiveActivity(withAttributesName: self.activityAttributesName, pushToStartToken: pushToken, seq: seqCreate(), pushType: .jPush) } }else { // Fallback on eralier versions } // obverser live activity update Task { for await activity in Activity<HLPlatformActivityAttributes>.activityUpdates { if let businessLiveActivityId = activity.attributes.businessLiveActivityId, let liveActivityId = activity.attributes.liveActivityId { Task { var beforeToken = "" for await pushToken in activity.pushTokenUpdates { // here the problem：sometimes pushToken not update to me let pushTokenStr = pushToken.map{String(format: "%02.2hhx", arguments: [$0])}.joined() // avoid send duplication if beforeToken == pushTokenStr { return } beforeToken = pushTokenStr // send pushToken to service } } Task { for await stateUpdate in activity.activityStateUpdates { if stateUpdate == .active { // live activity create } } } } } } }

Project structure is: App target + widget extension + widget intent extension All share a common appgroup group.com.x.y and all file handling is done using FileManager.default.containerURL(forSecurityApplicationGroupIdentifier: "group.com.x.y") so that only the shared container is used. Using the Main app target, a font "Chewy-Regular.ttf" is downloaded and saved to the shared AppGroup container. Font can now be loaded via CTFontManagerRegisterFontsForURL and displayed in a Main App Text view Text("Testing...").font(Font.custom("Chewy-Regular", size: 20)) Now add a Widgetkit widget instance that uses this font. In 'getTimeLine() and getSnapShot() of IntentTimelineProvider we load the font again via CTFontManagerRegisterFontsForURL (this needs to happen again probably because widget runs in a separate process from the main app?). On simulator, the widget will show the correct font. BUT On iPhone7 real device, the widget will show the 'redacted placeholder view'. It seems that something is crashing. I see in the device console : error 14:39:07.567120-0800 chronod No configuration found for configured widget identifier: D9BF75EE-4A04-441A-8C85-1507F7ECE379 fault 14:39:07.625600-0800 widgetxExtension -[EXSwiftUI_Subsystem beginUsing:withBundle:] unexpectedly called multiple times. error 14:39:07.672733-0800 chronod Encountered an error reading the view archive for &amp;lt;private&amp;gt;; error: &amp;lt;private&amp;gt; error 14:39:07.672799-0800 chronod [co.appevolve.onewidget.widgetx:widgetx:small:1536744920620481560@148.0/148.0/20.2] reload: could not decode view error 14:39:07.674984-0800 kernel Sandbox: chronod(2128) deny(1) file-read-metadata /private/var/mobile/Containers/Shared/AppGroup/9B524570-1765-4C24-9E0C-15BC3982F0DC/downloadedFonts/Chewy/Chewy-Regular.ttf error 14:39:07.675762-0800 kernel Sandbox: chronod(2128) deny(1) file-read-data /private/var/mobile/Containers/Shared/AppGroup/9B524570-1765-4C24-9E0C-15BC3982F0DC/downloadedFonts/Chewy/Chewy-Regular.ttf error 14:39:07.708914-0800 chronod [u 8D2C83B3-A6CB-432E-A9D4-9BC8F7056B10:m (null)] [&amp;lt;private&amp;gt;(&amp;lt;private&amp;gt;)] Connection to plugin invalidated while in use. fault 14:39:07.710284-0800 widgetxExtension -[EXSwiftUI_Subsystem beginUsing:withBundle:] unexpectedly called multiple times. error 14:39:07.803468-0800 chronod Encountered an error reading the view archive for &amp;lt;private&amp;gt;; error: &amp;lt;private&amp;gt; It seems that it's a permission issue, and the textview can't access the font file it needs when the widget is rendering. Notes: 1) Font is definitely registered because I can see them in for fontFamily in UIFont.familyNames {             for fontName in UIFont.fontNames(forFamilyName: fontFamily) {                 print(fontName) &amp;amp;#9;&amp;amp;#9;&amp;amp;#9;&amp;amp;#9;&amp;amp;#9;&amp;amp;#9;&amp;amp;#9;&amp;amp;#9;... in both the Main App target and the Widget Extension target 2) If I make make the font part of the app bundle and add to 'Fonts provided by application' , the are loaded absolutely fine in the Main App and the Widget on simulator and iPhone 7 real device. 3) I do see this error sometimes in the Widget extension target log, don't know if it's related. widgetxExtension[1385:254599] [User Defaults] Couldn't read values in CFPrefsPlistSource&amp;lt;0x28375b880&amp;gt; (Domain: group.co.appevolve.onewidget, User: kCFPreferencesAnyUser, ByHost: Yes, Container: (null), Contents Need Refresh: Yes): Using kCFPreferencesAnyUser with a container is only allowed for System Containers, detaching from cfprefsd 4) I suspected something to do with app groups, so I tried to copy the font into the Widget Extension container and load from there, but had the same result. Please help! Thank you.

I noticed that with iOS 18, when adding a widget to the Control Center, there is now some "grouping system". I'm interested in the Capture group, which contains native widgets from Apple as well as third party apps like Instagram and Blackmagic cam, widgets in this group open the camera. My widget also opens the camera in my app, how can I add it to this group?

I would like to add a Live Activity to my app, but unfortunately I always get an error message. When I go into the Identifiers via the Developer Portal and look at my app, there is no Activity Kit or Live Activity in the Capabilites that I could activate. In XCode I don't see the option for Signing & Capabilities either... Can anyone help me how to add this correctly? Thanks in advance!

Do we need to include a 1x, 2x, and 3x version of each asset shown on the widget? Can we instead just supply a single 3x version and have the system display this for all device types? We are concerned about our growing app size

I've noticed that the when starting live activities via a remote push-to-start notification, the live activity widget consistently succeeds in displaying on the lock screen. However push-to-update token is not always received by the task observing the pushTokenUpdates async-sequence. Task { print("listening for pushTokenUpdates") for await pushToken in activity.pushTokenUpdates { let token = pushToken.map {String(format: "%02x", $0)}.joined() print("Push token: \(token)") } } The log will print "listening for pushTokenUpdates" however occasionally the "Push token: ___" line will not be present even when the widget has displayed on screen. This happens even if the "allow" button has been selected on live activities for that app. The inconsistent behavior leads me to believe there is an issue at the ActivityKit level. Would appreciate any feedback in debugging this!

Confusion Based on the fact that the subscription is requested on a Activity type, I assumed that the push-to-start tokens would be different. But the push-to-start token for WidgetExtensionAttributes and WidgetExtensionAttributesOther were identical. This is misleading. The code below prints identical tokens even though the name of the token and their underlying schema are different. Code Sample func getTokens() { Task { if let data = Activity<func getTokens() { Task { if let data = Activity<WidgetExtensionAttributes>.pushToStartToken { print("exists:", data.hexadecimalString) } else { print("requesting pushToStartToken") for await ptsToken in Activity<WidgetExtensionAttributes> .pushToStartTokenUpdates { let ptsTokenString = ptsToken.hexadecimalString print("new:", ptsTokenString) } } } Task { if let data = Activity<WidgetExtensionAttributesOther>.pushToStartToken { print("other exists:", data.hexadecimalString) } else { print("other requesting pushToStartToken") for await ptsToken in Activity<WidgetExtensionAttributesOther> .pushToStartTokenUpdates { let ptsTokenString = ptsToken.hexadecimalString print("other new:", ptsTokenString) } } } }>.pushToStartToken { print("exists:", data.hexadecimalString) } else { print("requesting pushToStartToken") for await ptsToken in Activity<WidgetExtensionAttributes> .pushToStartTokenUpdates { let ptsTokenString = ptsToken.hexadecimalString print("new:", ptsTokenString) } } } Task { if let data = Activity<WidgetExtensionAttributesOther>.pushToStartToken { print("other exists:", data.hexadecimalString) } else { print("other requesting pushToStartToken") for await ptsToken in Activity<WidgetExtensionAttributesOther> .pushToStartTokenUpdates { let ptsTokenString = ptsToken.hexadecimalString print("other new:", ptsTokenString) } } } } Activity Types struct WidgetExtensionAttributesOther: ActivityAttributes { public struct ContentState: Codable, Hashable { var age: Int } var addresses: [String] } struct WidgetExtensionAttributes: ActivityAttributes { public struct ContentState: Codable, Hashable { var emoji: String } var name: String } Docs After much investigation I noticed the wording of the docs kind of hint that the push-to-start token is per ActivityKit as it says: An asynchronous sequence you use to observe changes to the token for starting a Live Activity with an ActivityKit push notification. But docs and the API don't align well. Questions Is it correct that the push-to-start token is per app? If so then is there a reason that that API designers decided to still have to pass a specific type and not just make a request without passing a type? Should I maybe file a radar? Is it correct to say push-to-start is per app, while update tokens are per instance. i.e. if I have two soccer matches, then unless the push-to-start token was refreshed by the OS, then both would use the same push-to-start token, however each match would have a unique update token?

In WatchOS 26 you can now configure Apple Watch Widgets that use AppIntents instead of having a preconfigured option via AppIntentRecommendation. This is demonstrated in the Weather Details Widget. In that, the Intent has been set up such that the options have icons for each parameter. How can I update my Intent code to offer this? struct DataPointsWidgetIntent: AppIntent, WidgetConfigurationIntent { static var title: LocalizedStringResource = "Data Points Widget Configuration" static var description = IntentDescription("Configure the individual data point display for Widgets.") static var isDiscoverable: Bool { return false} init() {} func perform() async throws -> some IntentResult { print("DataPointsWidgetIntent perform") return .result() } @Parameter(title: "Show Individual Data Points", default: true) var showDataPoints: Bool? @Parameter(title: "Trend Timescale", default: .week) var timescale: TimescaleTypeAppEnum? static var parameterSummary: some ParameterSummary { Summary("Test Info") { \.$showDataPoints \.$timescale } } } enum TimescaleTypeAppEnum: String, AppEnum { case week case fortnight static var typeDisplayRepresentation = TypeDisplayRepresentation(name: "Trend Timescale") static var caseDisplayRepresentations: [Self: DisplayRepresentation] = [ .week: "Past Week", .fortnight: "Past Fortnight" ] }

I'm currently seeing that OS gets a new push-to-start token immediately after receiving the first notification. Should my server immediately invalidate the push-to-start token upon usage? Or invalidating the push-to-start token should only be done if my iOS device gets a new one and then I have to send it back to my server.

I'm looking to maximise my Watch app's widget to be as up to date as possible. If we imagined the app was a simple step counter, and we wanted to display the users count as up to date as possible. We can conclude: We don't care about widget timelines beyond the current entry as we can't predict the future! We need to refresh the count as often as possible The refresh should be very quick with a straightforward HealthKit query, no networking or heavy work needed. We will assume the user has the complication/widget on their active Watch face. With the standard WidgetKit APIs we can expire the timeline after 15 minutes and in my experimentation a Watch app can usually update its widget timeline at that frequency if it's on the Watch face. I'm experimenting with two methods to try and improve refreshes further A user's step count might not have recently changed when the timeline update is called. I was therefore looking into the HealthKit enableBackgroundDelivery API (which requires the HealthKit Background Delivery entitlement to be enabled) to get updates limited to once an hour from a HKObserverQuery, I can then call the WidgetCenter.shared.reloadAllTimelines() from there. WatchOS also support the BGAppRefreshTaskRequest(identifier:"") and .backgroundTask(.appRefresh) APIs. I can request updates once every 15 minutes here too and then call the WidgetCenter.shared.reloadAllTimelines(). With option 1, this update opportunity is great as it will specifically update when there's new steps so even once an hour this would be helpful (A real shame to be limited to once an hour even if this used up WidgetKit standard reload budgets: FB13879817, FB11677132, FB10016177). But I can't determine if this update takes away one of the standard timeline expiration updates that already run 4 times an hour? Could I observe additional Health types to get additional updates? Do I need the Background Modes Capability as well as the HealthKit Background Delivery for this in Xcode or just the HealthKit one? With option 2, I can't find a suitable option in the (short) list of supported background modes in Xcode. Does not selecting any mean my app will get 0 refreshes from this route and so should not be implemented in my use case?

I'm building a set of widgets that feature various emoji flags. However, when displayed in tinted mode, the emojis appear as solid white. Is there a way to control or override the rendering mode of emojis in this context? Any guidance would be very much appreciated. Thank you!

Hi. I need some help in starting the live activity in terminated state using push notification. I have developed an app which does not sleep and always run even in the background state. It is pressure calculator. From sensor, it will receive the pressure and display the values in the app. Whenever the pressure reaches a certain point, it should display the alert in the dynamic island. As of now, it is displaying live activity in the foreground state. Working partially fine in the background state. But not working in the terminated state. but in the documentation it have been mentioned we can start the live activity using push notification from any state. Please help me to find a solution.