MacOS Version: 14.7.2 macOS SDKs: macOS 14.5 -sdk macosx14.5 I am working on a sample program for validation Against: Team Identifier Developer ID I started with validating Team Identifier, but my validation is not working and it is allowing to launch programs which are not matching the team identifier in the signature. Below is my code: func verifyExecutableWithLCR(executablePath: String, arguments: [String]) -> Bool { let task = Process() task.launchPath = executablePath task.arguments = arguments if #available(macOS 14.4, *) { print("launchRequirementData is available on this system.") do { let req = try OnDiskCodeRequirement.allOf { TeamIdentifier("ABCDEFGHI") //SigningIdentifier("com.***.client.***-Client.****") } let encoder = PropertyListEncoder() encoder.outputFormat = .xml let requirementData = try encoder.encode(req) task.launchRequirementData = requirementData print("launchRequirementData is set.") try task.run() print("[SUCCESS] Executable passed the code signature verification.") return true } catch { print("[ERROR] Code signature verification failed: \(error.localizedDescription)") return false } } else { print("[WARNING] launchRequirement is not available on this macOS version.") return false } } Could you please help me in identifying whay am I doing wrong here?

Hi, I have been recently debugging the BGContinuedProcessingTask API and encountered some of the following issues. I hope you can provide some answers: First, let me explain my understanding of this API. I believe its purpose is to allow an app to trigger tasks that can be represented with progress indicators and require a certain amount of time to complete. After entering the background, these tasks can continue to be completed through the BGContinuedProcessingTask, preventing the system from terminating them before they are finished. In the launchHandler of the registration process, we only need to do a few things: Determine whether the actual business processing is still ongoing. Update the progress, title, and subtitle. Handle the expirationHandler. Set the task as completed. Here are some issues I encountered during my debugging process: After I called register and submit, the BGContinuedProcessingTask could not be triggered. The return values from my API calls were all normal. I tried different device models, and some could trigger the task normally, such as the 15 Pro Max and 12 Pro Max. However, there were also some models, such as the 17 Pro, 15 Pro, and 15, that could not trigger the task properly. Moreover, there was no additional error information to help locate the issue. The background task failed unexpectedly, but my app was still running normally. As I mentioned above, my launchHandler only retrieves the actual business status and updates it. If a background task fails unexpectedly while the app is still running normally, it can mislead users and degrade the user experience of the app. Others have also mentioned the issue of inconsistent behavior on devices that do not support Dynamic Island. On devices that support Dynamic Island, when a task is triggered in the foreground, the app does not immediately display a pop-up notification within the app. However, on devices that do not support Dynamic Island, the app directly displays a pop-up notification within the app, and this notification does not disappear when switching between different screens within the same app. The user needs to actively swipe up to dismiss it. I think this experience is too intrusive for users. I would like to know whether this will be maintained in the future or if there is a plan to fix it. On devices that do not support Dynamic Island, using the beta version 26.1 of the system, if the system is in dark mode but the app triggers a business interface in white, the pop-up notification will have the same color as the current page, making it difficult to read the content inside the pop-up. Users can actively stop background tasks by using the stop button, or the system can also stop tasks automatically when resources are insufficient or when a task is abnormal. However, according to the current API, all these actions are triggered through the expirationHandler. Currently, there is no way to distinguish whether the task was stopped by the user, by the system due to resource insufficiency, or due to an abnormal task. I would like to know whether there will be more information provided in the future to help distinguish these different scenarios. I believe that the user experience issues mentioned in points 2 and 3 are the most important. Please help to answer the questions and concerns above. Thank you!

Hello, My app (daemon) time to time need to know list of GUI login sessions. According to the recommendation, I am using getutxent(). https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/qa/qa1133/_index.html However, I have faced with unclear behaviour in case of running "Migration Assistant". It can be re-created without my app. Steps to recreate: login as 'user #1' start "Migration Assistant" quit "Migration Assistant" new login prompt will be opened login as 'user #2' In spite the session of 'user #1' is closed, the command line tool "who", which gathers information from /var/run/utmpx, reports opened sessions of 'user #1'. Is it bug or feature? Thank you in advance!

On MacOS 26 Tahoe, we are getting a background warning message stating, “App is running in the background…” Is this expected behavior on the new OS? Thanks Asutos

Problem summary I have a macOS helper app that is launched from a sandboxed main app. The helper: has com.apple.security.app-sandbox = true and com.apple.security.inherit = true in its entitlements, is signed and embedded inside the main app bundle (placed next to the main executable in Contents/MacOS), reports entitlement_check = 1 (code signature contains sandbox entitlement, implemented via SecStaticCode… check), sandbox_check(getpid(), NULL, 0) returns 1 (runtime sandbox enforcement present), APP_SANDBOX_CONTAINER_ID environment variable is not present (0). Despite that, Cocoa APIs return non-container home paths: NSHomeDirectory() returns /Users/<me>/ (the real home). [[NSFileManager defaultManager] URLsForDirectory:inDomains:] and URLForDirectory:inDomain:appropriateForURL:create:error: return paths rooted at /Users/<me>/ (not under ~/Library/Containers/<app_id>/Data/...) — i.e. they look like non-sandboxed locations. However, one important exception: URLForDirectory:... for NSItemReplacementDirectory (temporary/replacement items) does return a path under the helper's container (example: ~/Library/Containers/<app_id>/Data/tmp/TemporaryItems/NSIRD_<helper_name>_hfc1bZ). This proves the sandbox is active for some FileManager APIs, yet standard directory lookups (Application Support, Documents, Caches, and NSHomeDirectory()) are not being redirected to the container. What I expect The helper (which inherits the sandbox and is clearly sandboxed) should get container-scoped paths from Cocoa’s FileManager APIs (Application Support, Documents, Caches), i.e. paths under the helper’s container: /Users/<me>/Library/Containers/<app_id>/Data/.... What I tried / diagnostics already gathered Entitlements & code signature codesign -d --entitlements :- /path/to/Helper.app/Contents/MacOS/Helper # shows com.apple.security.app-sandbox = true and com.apple.security.inherit = true Runtime checks (Objective-C++ inside helper): extern "C" int sandbox_check(pid_t pid, const char *op, int flags); NSLog(@"entitlement_check = %d", entitlement_check()); // SecStaticCode check NSLog(@"env_variable_check = %d", (getenv("APP_SANDBOX_CONTAINER_ID") != NULL)); NSLog(@"runtime_sandbox_check = %d", sandbox_check(getpid(), nullptr, 0)); NSLog(@"NSHomeDirectory = %s", NSHomeDirectory()); NSArray *urls = [[NSFileManager defaultManager] URLsForDirectory:NSApplicationSupportDirectory inDomains:NSUserDomainMask]; NSLog(@"URLsForDirectory: %@", urls); Observed output: entitlement_check = 1 env_variable_check = 0 runtime_sandbox_check = 1 NSHomeDirectory = /Users/<me> URLsForDirectory: ( "file:///Users/<me>/Library/Application%20Support/..." ) Temporary/replacement directory (evidence sandbox active for some APIs): NSURL *tmpReplacement = [[NSFileManager defaultManager] URLForDirectory:NSItemReplacementDirectory inDomain:NSUserDomainMask appropriateForURL:nil create:YES error:&err]; NSLog(@"NSItemReplacementDirectory: %@", tmpReplacement.path); Observed output (example): /Users/<me>/Library/Containers/<app_id>/Data/tmp/TemporaryItems/NSIRD_<helper_name>_hfc1bZ Other facts Calls to NSHomeDirectory() and URLsForDirectory: are made after main() to avoid "too early" initialization problems. Helper is placed in Contents/MacOS (not Contents/Library/LoginItems). Helper is a non-GUI helper binary launched by the main app (not an XPC service). macOS version: Sequoia 15.6 Questions Why do NSHomeDirectory() and URLsForDirectory: return the real /Users/<me>/... paths in a helper process that is clearly sandboxed (entitlement + runtime enforcement), while NSItemReplacementDirectory returns a container-scoped temporary path? Is this behavior related to how the helper is packaged or launched (e.g., placement in Contents/MacOS vs Contents/Library/LoginItems, or whether it is launched with posix_spawn/fork+exec vs other APIs)? Are there additional entitlements or packaging rules required for a helper that inherits sandbox to have Cocoa directory APIs redirected to the container (for Application Support, Documents, Caches)? *Thanks in advance — I can add any requested logs

Dear Apple Support Team, My app, io.cylonix.sase, has a BGAppRefreshTask (io.cylonix.sase.ios.refresh) that is canceled by dasd ~9ms after submission from a Network Extension. Please help identify the cause and suggest a solution. App Details: App ID: io.cylonix.sase iOS Version: 17.1.1 (iPhone Xs Max) Network Extension: saseWgNetworkExtension with packet-tunnel-provider entitlement Use Case: VPN app; Network Extension records file receipts in shared group UserDefaults and schedules BGAppRefreshTask to wake the main app. App Usage: High (frequently used) System State: Sufficient resources (not low on battery or memory) Issue: The task is submitted but canceled immediately with priority 10. It has never run, so rate-limiting is not an issue. ` debug 22:09:37.952749-0700 dasd Best binding found for evaluator 0x16d541720: <private> debug 22:09:37.954483-0700 dasd Invoking selector backgroundTaskSchedulerPermittedIdentifiersWithContext:tableID:unitID:unitBytes: on <LSApplicationRecord 0x724844650> default 22:09:37.955563-0700 dasd CANCELED: bgRefresh-io.cylonix.sase.ios.refresh:ABDAFA at priority 10 <private>!

I'm trying to launch a command line app from my objective C application (sandboxed) using NSTask and I keep getting "launch path not accessible" Here is the path: [task setLaunchPath:@"/usr/local/bin/codeview"]; I have set the appropriate attributes for codeview and it is working perfectly when I use it from the command line and /usr/local/bin IS in the $PATH I know I have NSTask configured correctly because this WILL work: [task setLaunchPath:@"/usr/bin/hexdump"]; With the exception being that I'm using a command already in /usr/bin. But I can't copy codeview into /usr/bin due to SIPS. I've tried moving codeview to various other non-SIPS protected locations all to no avail. Must all NSTask commands come from /usr/bin? Where might I put codeview so that it can be launched. Today I'm going to use an older computer and disable SIPS to put my command in /usr/bin and see if that works. If it does. I will do it on my main machine.

I need to check how long we can run an app in background which act as a consumer of data / control filter. What is the max time we get to run our app in background without any of these app strategies? https://developer.apple.com/documentation/backgroundtasks/choosing-background-strategies-for-your-app

Hello, https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/802443 https://developer.apple.com/documentation/servicemanagement/updating-helper-executables-from-earlier-versions-of-macos https://developer.apple.com/documentation/ServiceManagement/updating-your-app-package-installer-to-use-the-new-service-management-api#Run-the-sample-launch-agent Read these. Earlier we had a setup with SMJobBless, now we have migrated to SMAppService. Everything is working fine, the new API seems easier to manage, but we are having issues with updating the daemon. I was wondering, what is the right process for updating a daemon from app side? What we are doing so far: App asks daemon for version If version is lower than expected: daemon.unregister(), wait a second and daemon.register() again. The why? We have noticed that unregistering/registering multiple times, of same daemon, can cause the daemon to stop working as expected. The daemon toggle in Mac Settings -> Login Items & Extensions can be on or off, but the app can still pickup daemon running, but no daemon running in Activity monitor. Registration/unregistration can start failing and nothing helps to resolve this, only reseting with sfltool resetbtm and a restart seems to does the job. This is usually noticeable for test users, testing same daemon version with different app builds. In production app, we also increase the bundle version of daemon in plist, in test apps we - don't. I haven't found any sources of how the update of pre-bundled app daemon should work. Initial idea is register/unregister, but from what I have observed, this seems to mess up after multiple registrations. I have a theory, that sending the daemon a command to kill itself after app update, would load the latest daemon. Also, I haven't observed for daemon, with different build versions to update automatically. What is the right way to update a daemon with SMAppService setup? Thank you in advance.

Hello, I have a question regarding the behavior of BGProcessingTaskRequest when the app is force-quit by the user via the App Switcher. Based on common understanding and various discussions — including the following Apple Developer Forum threads: Waking up an iOS app after app is … | Apple Developer Forums Will BGAppRefreshTaskRequest will … | Apple Developer Forums Background fetch after app is forc… | Apple Developer Forums …it is widely understood that iOS prevents background execution (such as background fetch, push notifications, or BGTaskScheduler) after a user force-quits an app via the App Switcher. However, in my app, I have observed that a scheduled BGProcessingTaskRequest still executes even after the app has been explicitly terminated via App Switcher. The task is scheduled using submit(_:error:), and it is clearly running some time after the app has been closed by the user. That said, the task does run, but it appears to operate under tighter constraints — for example, it may be allowed to run for a shorter duration, and network requests appear to be more restricted compared to when the app is not force-quit. My questions are: Are there any documented or undocumented exceptions that allow this kind of behavior after force-quit? Could this be a bug or a behavior change in recent iOS versions? (I am observing this on iOS 18.3, 18.4, and 18.5) Any insights, experiences, or clarifications from Apple engineers or fellow developers would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!

I have BGProcessingTask & BGAppRefreshTask working fine. The main purpose of my use of BGProcessingTask is to upload a file to AWS S3 using multipart/form-data. I have found that any file above about 2.5MB times out after running almost four minutes. If I run the same RESTful api using curl or Postman, I can upload a 25MB file in 3 seconds or less. I have tried to deliberately set .earliestBeginDate to 01:00 or 02:00 local time on the iPhone, but that does not seem to help. I use the delegate (yes, I am writing in Objective C) - URLSession:task:didSendBodyData:totalBytesSent:totalBytesExpectedToSend: and find that the iOS system uploads about 140kB every 15 seconds or so. I am looking for recommendations or insight into how I might enable uploads of 25MB files. I would be happy it I could do just one a day for my use case. I provide code on how I set up the NSURLSession and NSURLSessionDownloadTask, as it is my guess that if there is something that needs to be modified it is there. I have to believe there is a solution for this since I read in many posts here and in StackOverflow how developers are using this functionality for uploading many, many files. NSURLSessionConfiguration *sConf = [NSURLSessionConfiguration backgroundSessionConfigurationWithIdentifier:bkto.taskIdentifier]; sConf.URLCache = [NSURLCache sharedURLCache]; sConf.waitsForConnectivity = YES; sConf.allowsCellularAccess = NO; sConf.networkServiceType = NSURLNetworkServiceTypeVideot; sConf.multipathServiceType = NSURLSessionMultipathServiceTypeNone; sConf.discretionary = YES; sConf.timeoutIntervalForResource = kONEHOURINTERVAL; sConf.timeoutIntervalForRequest = kONEMINUTEINTERVAL; sConf.allowsExpensiveNetworkAccess = NO ; sConf.allowsConstrainedNetworkAccess = NO; sConf.sessionSendsLaunchEvents = YES; myURLSession = [NSURLSession sessionWithConfiguration:sConf delegate:self delegateQueue:nil]; And then later in the code... NSMutableURLRequest *request = [NSMutableURLRequest requestWithURL:[NSURL URLWithString:pth]]; request.HTTPMethod = kHTTPPOST; request.HTTPBody = [NSData my body data]; request.timeoutInterval = 60; [request setValue:@"*/*" forHTTPHeaderField:@"Accept"]; [request setValue:@"en-us,en" forHTTPHeaderField:@"Accept-Language"]; [request setValue:@"gzip, deflate, br" forHTTPHeaderField:@"Accept-Encoding"]; [request setValue:@"ISO-8859-1,utf-8" forHTTPHeaderField:@"Accept-Charset"]; [request setValue:@"600" forHTTPHeaderField:@"Keep-Alive"]; [request setValue:@"keep-alive" forHTTPHeaderField:@"Connection"]; NSString *contType = [NSString stringWithFormat:@"multipart/form-data; boundary=%@",bnd]; [request setValue:contType forHTTPHeaderField:@"Content-Type"]; [request addValue:[NSString stringWithFormat:@"%lu",(unsigned long)myData.length] forHTTPHeaderField:@"Content-Length"]; and here are a few lines from my logs to show the infrequent multi-part uploads of only small chunks of data by the iOS system: -[BKSessionManager URLSession:task:didSendBodyData:totalBytesSent:totalBytesExpectedToSend:]: bytesSent = 393,216 -[BKSessionManager URLSession:task:didSendBodyData:totalBytesSent:totalBytesExpectedToSend:]: totalBytesSent = 393,216 -[BKSessionManager URLSession:task:didSendBodyData:totalBytesSent:totalBytesExpectedToSend:]: task = BackgroundDownloadTask <76A81A80-4703-4686-8742-A0048EB65108>.<2>, time Fri Mar 7 16:25:27 2025 -[BKSessionManager URLSession:task:didSendBodyData:totalBytesSent:totalBytesExpectedToSend:]: bytesSent = 131,072 -[BKSessionManager URLSession:task:didSendBodyData:totalBytesSent:totalBytesExpectedToSend:]: totalBytesSent = 524,288 -[BKSessionManager URLSession:task:didSendBodyData:totalBytesSent:totalBytesExpectedToSend:]: task = BackgroundDownloadTask <76A81A80-4703-4686-8742-A0048EB65108>.<2>, time Fri Mar 7 16:25:42 2025 -[BKSessionManager URLSession:task:didSendBodyData:totalBytesSent:totalBytesExpectedToSend:]: bytesSent = 131,072 -[BKSessionManager URLSession:task:didSendBodyData:totalBytesSent:totalBytesExpectedToSend:]: totalBytesSent = 655,360 -[BKSessionManager URLSession:task:didSendBodyData:totalBytesSent:totalBytesExpectedToSend:]: task = BackgroundDownloadTask <76A81A80-4703-4686-8742-A0048EB65108>.<2>, time Fri Mar 7 16:25:56 2025 -[BKSessionManager URLSession:task:didSendBodyData:totalBytesSent:totalBytesExpectedToSend:]: bytesSent = 131,072 -[BKSessionManager URLSession:task:didSendBodyData:totalBytesSent:totalBytesExpectedToSend:]: totalBytesSent = 786,432

I am building an app that uses the SMAppService to register a LaunchDaemon that is bundled with my .app. I've got a priming flow created which walks the user through approving the service so that it will start on login. However, I need to also be able to upgrade this background service if the user updates the app. To do this, I think I need to call unregisterAndReturnError and then registerAndReturnError. From my testing, this seems to work correctly, but I have a concern. Will the user ever be prompted to re-authorize the LaunchDaemon that I am registering? If so, under what circumstances will that happen, and what does it look like (so that I can guide the user through it)?

I have been experimenting with the BGContinuedProcessingTask API recently (and published sample code for it https://github.com/infinitepower18/BGContinuedProcessingTaskDemo) I have noticed that if I lock the phone, the code that runs as part of the task stops executing. My sample code simply updates the progress each second until it gets to 100, so it should be completed in 1 minute 40 seconds. However, after locking the phone and checking the lock screen a few seconds later the progress indicator was in the same position as before I locked it. If I leave the phone locked for several minutes and check the lock screen the live activity says "Task failed". I haven't seen anything in the documentation regarding execution of tasks while the phone is locked. So I'm a bit confused if I encountered an iOS bug here?

What’s the recommended way to recursively walk through a directory tree using File Coordination? From what I understand, coordinating a read of a directory only performs a “shallow” lock; this would mean that I’d need to implement the recursive walk myself rather than use FileManager.enumerator(at:includingPropertiesForKeys:options:errorHandler:) plus a single NSFileCoordinator.coordinate(with:queue:byAccessor:) call. I’m trying to extract information from all files of a particular type, so I think using NSFileCoordinator.ReadingOptions.immediatelyAvailableMetadataOnly on each file before acquiring a full read lock on it (if it’s the right file type) would make sense. Am I on the right track?

When using conformance to ObservableObject and then doing async work in a Task, you will get a warning courtesy of Combine if you then update an @Published or @State var from anywhere but the main thread. However, if you are using @Observable there is no such warning. Also, Thread.current is unavailable in asynchronous contexts, so says the warning. And I have read that in a sense you simply aren't concerned with what thread an async task is on. So for me, that begs a question. Is the lack of a warning, which when using Combine is rather important as ignoring it could lead to crashes, a pretty major bug that Apple seemingly should have addressed long ago? Or is it just not an issue to update state from another thread, because Xcode is doing that work for us behind the scenes too, just as it manages what thread the async task is running on when we don't specify? I see a lot of posts about this from around the initial release of Async/Await talking about using await MainActor.run {} at the point the state variable is updated, usually also complaining about the lack of a warning. But ow years later there is still no warning and I have to wonder if this is actually a non issue. On some ways similar to the fact that many of the early posts I have seen related to @Observable have examples of an @Observable ViewModel instantiated in the view as an @State variable, but in fact this is not needed as that is addressed behind the scenes for all properties of an @Observable type. At least, that is my understanding now, but I am learning Swift coming from a PowerShell background so I question my understanding a lot.

Hello, I have a few questions regarding the documentation here: Can this method described in the article be built with Xcode 26 and run on iOS 26? Or is it restricted to run only on iOS 26, since AppExtensionPoint appears to be available starting from iOS 26? Does this approach allow two apps under the same Team ID to communicate with each other? Does this approach also allow two apps under different Team IDs to communicate with each other? Is it mandatory to implement EXAppExtensionBrowserViewController and obtain user consent before using this method to exchange information? In our implementation, we followed the documentation. Inside EXAppExtensionBrowserViewController, we were able to see the Generic Extension from another app and enabled the permission. However, we still get the following error: Failed to connect: Error Domain=NABUExtensionConnector Code=1 "No matching extension found" UserInfo={NSLocalizedDescription=No matching extension found} Could someone clarify whether this is expected behavior, or if we are missing an additional configuration step? Thanks in advance!

Hi, I built an Electron app that uses puppeteer-cluster to open a bundled version of Chrome. Everything works before packaging/signing with electron builder. Transporter does not report any issues and the app opens in TestFlight. the Chrome.app is signed separately before running builder hardenedRuntime = false However, a permission error occurs when cluster attempts to launch Chrome: Error: Unable to launch browser, error message: Failed to launch the browser process! [0601/152740.225314:ERROR:bootstrap.cc(65)] bootstrap_check_in org.chromium.crashpad.child_port_handshake.9915.63117.BUEXLMXFWPLCEONM: Permission denied (1100) [0601/152740.226091:ERROR:file_io.cc(94)] ReadExactly: expected 4, observed 0 [0601/152740.229808:ERROR:bootstrap.cc(65)] bootstrap_check_in org.chromium.crashpad.child_port_handshake.9913.63115.VVKELOQUCWUYPFMQ: Permission denied (1100) [0601/152740.230244:ERROR:file_io.cc(94)] ReadExactly: expected 4, observed 0 [9911:45571:0601/152740.506968:ERROR:named_platform_channel_mac.cc(44)] bootstrap_check_in com.google.chrome.for.testing.apps.52995c87946bbcc94fc9a27df1478a13: Permission denied (1100) [9911:62467:0601/152740.507564:FATAL:mach_port_rendezvous.cc(281)] Check failed: kr == KERN_SUCCESS. bootstrap_check_in com.google.chrome.for.testing.MachPortRendezvousServer.9911: Permission denied (1100) at Cluster.<anonymous> (/Applications/MyApp.app/Contents/Resources/app.asar/node_modules/puppeteer-cluster/dist/Cluster.js:119:23) at Generator.throw (<anonymous>) at rejected (/Applications/MyApp.app/Contents/Resources/app.asar/node_modules/puppeteer-cluster/dist/Cluster.js:6:65) at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:105:5) I'm wondering if it's an issue with entitlements, or something more. The entitlements.mas.plist (aside from identifiers): com.apple.security.app-sandbox com.apple.security.cs.allow-jit com.apple.security.cs.allow-unsigned-executable-memory com.apple.security.cs.allow-dyld-environment-variables com.apple.security.network.client com.apple.security.network.server com.apple.security.files.user-selected.read-write com.apple.security.cs.disable-executable-page-protection com.apple.security.files.user-selected.executable I've spent many hours searching for a solution. Any help or insight would be greatly appreciated.

For a macOS GUI application (with a UIKit or AppKit entry point), I want to reliably capture diagnostic logs sent to stderr — especially useful when the app is launched from a terminal script or runs in the background, and traditional GUI elements (like alert dialogs) may not be viable. This is to log startup failures or even success messages for later inspection. However, when the app is launched via open MyApp.app, stderr redirection like open MyApp.app 2> log.txt does not capture any output — the file is created, but remains empty. The only way I can capture stderr reliably is by bypassing the bundle and directly launching the binary inside with ./MyApp.app/Contents/MacOS/MyApp 2> ~/log.txt This logs as expected, but is not the user-friendly or typical way to launch apps on macOS. Double-clicking the app in Finder also does not show any stderr output. Is there any recommended or supported way to redirect or access stderr output when launching a .app bundle via open, or any best practice for logging critical failures from a GUI app when terminal output isn't visible?

Testing Environment: iOS: 26.0 Beta 7 Xcode: Beta 6 Description: We are implementing the new BGContinuedProcessingTask API introduced in iOS 26. We have followed the official documentation and WWDC session guidance to configure our project. The Background Modes (processing) and Background GPU Access capabilities have been added in Xcode. The com.apple.developer.background-tasks.continued-processing.gpu entitlement is present and set to in the .entitlements file. The provisioning profile details viewed within Xcode explicitly show that the "Background GPU Access" capability and the corresponding entitlement are included. Despite this correct configuration, when running the app on supported hardware (iPhone 16 Pro), a call to BGTaskScheduler.supportedResources.contains(.gpu) consistently returns false. This prevents us from setting request.requiredResources = .gpu. As a result, when the BGContinuedProcessingTask starts without the GPU resource flag, our internal Metal-based exporter attempts to access the GPU and is terminated by the system, throwing an IOGPUMetalError: Insufficient Permission (to submit GPU work from background). We have performed extensive debugging, including a full reset of the provisioning profile (removing/re-adding capabilities, toggling automatic signing, cleaning build folders, and reinstalling the app), but the issue persists. This strongly suggests a bug in the iOS 26 beta where the runtime is failing to correctly validate a valid entitlement. Additionally, we've observed inconsistent behavior across devices. On an A16-based iPad, the task submits successfully (BGTaskScheduler.submit does not throw an error), but the launch handler is never invoked by the system. On the iPhone 16 Pro, the handler is invoked, but we encounter the supportedResources issue described above. This leads us to ask for clarification on the exact hardware requirements for this feature. We hypothesize that it may be limited to devices that support Apple Intelligence (A17 Pro and newer). Could you please confirm this and provide official documentation on the device support criteria? Steps to Reproduce: Create a new Xcode project. In Signing & Capabilities, add "Background Modes" (with "Background processing" checked) and "Background GPU Access". Add a permitted identifier (e.g., "com.company.test.*") to BGTaskSchedulerPermittedIdentifiers in Info.plist. In application(_:didFinishLaunchingWithOptions:) or a ViewController's viewDidLoad, log the result of BGTaskScheduler.shared.supportedResources.contains(.gpu). Build and run on a physical, supported device (e.g., iPhone 16 Pro). Expected Results: The log should indicate that BGTaskScheduler.shared.supportedResources.contains(.gpu) returns true. Actual Results: The log shows that BGTaskScheduler.shared.supportedResources.contains(.gpu) returns false.

I'm troubleshooting a crash I do not understand. I have a queue called DataQueue which never has anything dispatched to it - it's the sample buffer delegate of an AVCaptureVideoDataOutput. It can call DispatchQueue.main.sync to do some work on the main thread. It works fine no matter what we test, but has some crashes in the field that I need to fix. Here's it crashing: AppleCameraDataDelegate.dataQueue 0 libsystem_kernel.dylib 0x7bdc __ulock_wait + 8 1 libdispatch.dylib 0x4a80 _dlock_wait + 52 2 libdispatch.dylib 0x486c _dispatch_thread_event_wait_slow$VARIANT$mp + 52 3 libdispatch.dylib 0x113d8 __DISPATCH_WAIT_FOR_QUEUE__ + 332 4 libdispatch.dylib 0x10ff0 _dispatch_sync_f_slow + 140 The main thread isn't doing something I asked it to, but appears to be busy: Thread 0 libsystem_kernel.dylib 0x71a4 __psynch_cvwait + 8 1 libsystem_pthread.dylib 0x7fd8 _pthread_cond_wait$VARIANT$mp + 1232 2 grpc 0x2cb670 gpr_cv_wait + 131 (sync.cc:131) 3 grpc 0x119688 grpc_core::Executor::ThreadMain(void*) + 225 (executor.cc:225) 4 grpc 0x2e023c grpc_core::(anonymous namespace)::ThreadInternalsPosix::ThreadInternalsPosix(char const*, void (*)(void*), void*, bool*, grpc_core::Thread::Options const&)::'lambda'(void*)::__invoke(void*) + 146 (thd.cc:146) 5 libsystem_pthread.dylib 0x482c _pthread_start + 104 6 libsystem_pthread.dylib 0xcd8 thread_start + 8 Can anyone help me understand why this is a crash?