Hi,
I’m using a Local Push Connectivity Extension and encountering an issue with DispatchSourceTimer.
In my extension, I create a DispatchSourceTimer that is supposed to fire every 1 second. It works as expected at first. However, when the app is in the foreground and the device is locked, the timer eventually stops firing after 1–3 hours.
The extension process is still alive, and no errors are thrown
Has anyone experienced this behavior?
Is this a known limitation for timers inside NEAppPushProvider, or is the extension being deprioritized silently by the system?
Any insights or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
Processes & Concurrency
RSS for tagDiscover how the operating system manages multiple applications and processes simultaneously, ensuring smooth multitasking performance.
Selecting any option will automatically load the page
Post
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
When I run my app with XCode on my iPhone, and then moved into the background, I'm getting a EXC_BREAKPOINT exception after a few minutes, seemingly when iOS attempts to call my app with a BGAppRefreshTask:
Thread 23 Queue: com.apple.BGTaskScheduler (com.mycompany.MyApp.RefreshTask) (serial)
0 _dispatch_assert_queue_fail
12 _pthread_wqthread
Enqueued from com.apple.duet.activityscheduler.client.xpcqueue (Thread 23)
0 dispatch_async
20 start_wqthread
I can't quite understand the reason from this crash. In the background task, I'm attempting to update live activities. In the process, it might encounter code that calls MainActor and manipulate @Observable objects. Might that be the reason?
Topic:
App & System Services
SubTopic:
Processes & Concurrency
Tags:
Swift
Background Tasks
Observation
Hi,
I have a hard time getting my head wrapped around the possibilities of running a app or a task in a app in the background.
I have a app where I utilize MusicKit to create a playlist in Apple Music, and add songs to the playlist. Now the songs added are picked from choices made by the user, and the total number of songs to add is 75, and that takes some time. And if the user switches to a different app or the phone is locked, the add songs logic stops, and then starts again as soon as the app is active again.
What I am trying to achieve is of course for this to keep processing also when the app is not active, so basically to keep it running in the background.
But this is where I struggle to understand how I can do that - The available choice seems to be BGTaskScheduler, but that just does not seem correct. From what I understand it just schedules a task, and it will be processed whenever the app or phone "feels like it" (again, my understanding, might be wrong), and that won't work in my scenario. I want the task to start when the user taps a button, and just keep running until it is finished, regardless of if the app is active or not.
Any pointers, tips, advices out there on how I can achieve this?
Topic:
App & System Services
SubTopic:
Processes & Concurrency
Desired Behavior
I want the app to be able to handle multiple Push-to-Start notifications even when it is completely terminated. Each Live Activity should:
Be successfully displayed upon receiving a Push-to-Start notification.
Trigger background tasks to send its update token to the server, regardless of the time interval between notifications.
Problem
I am facing an issue with iOS Live Activities when using Push-to-Start notifications to trigger Live Activities in an app that has been completely terminated. Here’s the detailed scenario:
When the app is completely terminated and I send the first Push-to-Start notification:
The Live Activity is successfully displayed.
didFinishLaunchingWithOptions` is triggered, and background tasks execute correctly, including sending the update token to the server.
When I send consecutive Push-to-Start notifications in quick succession (e.g., within a few seconds or minutes):
Both notifications successfully display their respective Live Activities.
Background tasks are executed correctly for both notifications.
However, when there is a longer interval (e.g., 10 minutes) between two Push-to-Start notifications:
The first notification works perfectly—it displays the Live Activity, triggers didFinishLaunchingWithOptions, and executes background tasks.
The second notification successfully displays the Live Activity but fails to execute any background tasks, such as sending the update token to the server.
My HypothesisI
suspect that iOS might impose a restriction where background runtime for Push-to-Start notifications can only be granted once within a certain time frame after the app has been terminated.
Any insights into why this issue might be occurring or how to ensure consistent background task execution for multiple Push-to-Start notifications would be greatly appreciated!
I have an app that I'm using for my own purposes and is not in the app store. I would like to run an http server in the background for more than the allotted 3 minutes to allow persistent communications with a connected Bluetooth device. The Bluetooth device would poll the service at intervals. Is this possible to do? This app does not need app store approval since it's only for personal use.
Topic:
App & System Services
SubTopic:
Processes & Concurrency
Tags:
Foundation
IOBluetooth
Core Bluetooth
My app does really large uploads. Like several GB. We use the AWS SDK to upload to S3.
It seemed like using BGContinuedProcessingTask to complete a set of uploads for a particular item may improve UX as well as performance and reliability.
When I tried to get BGContinuedProcessingTask working with the AWS SDK I found that the task would fail after maybe 30 seconds. It looked like this was because the app stopped receiving updates from the AWS upload and the task wants consistent updates. The AWS SDK always uses a background URLSession and this is not configurable. I understand the background URLSession runs in a separate process from the app and maybe that is why progress updates did not continue when the app was in the background.
Is it expected that BGContinuedProcessingTask and background URLSession are not really compatible? It would not be shocking since they are 2 separate background APIs.
Would the Apple recommendation be to use a normal URLSession for this, in which case AWS would need to change their SDK?
Or does Apple think that BGContinuedProcessingTask should just not be used with uploads? In other words use an upload specific API.
Thanks!
Topic:
App & System Services
SubTopic:
Processes & Concurrency
Tags:
iOS
Beta
Background Tasks
CFNetwork
Purpose
I want to use launchd to run a shell script asynchronously every minute, but I'm encountering an issue where the job does not run, and I receive the error "Bootstrap failed: 5: Input/output error". I need help identifying the cause of this issue and how to configure launchd correctly.
What I've done
Created the shell script (test_ls_save.sh)
The script is designed to list the contents of the desktop and save the output to a specified directory.
#!/bin/bash
DATE=$(date +%Y-%m-%d_%H-%M-%S)
SAVE_DIR=/Users/test/Desktop/personal/log_gather
FILE_NAME="ls_output_$DATE.log"
ls ~/Desktop > "$SAVE_DIR/$FILE_NAME"
echo "ls output saved to $SAVE_DIR/$FILE_NAME"
File permissions (ls -l output): -rwxr-xr-x 1 test staff 1234 Feb 17 10:00 /Users/test/Desktop/personal/log_gather/exec/test_ls_save.sh
Created the launchd plist file (com.test.logTest.plist)
The plist file is configured to execute the shell script every minute.
<key>Label</key>
<string>com.test.logTest</string>
<key>ProgramArguments</key>
<array>
<string>/bin/bash</string>
<string>-c</string>
/Users/test/Desktop/personal/log_gather/exec/test_ls_save.sh
</array>
<key>StartInterval</key>
<integer>60</integer> <!-- Run every minute -->
File permissions (ls -l output): -rwxr-xr-x 1 test staff 512 Feb 17 10:00 /Users/test/Library/LaunchAgents/com.test.logTest.plist
Ran the job with launchctl
I used the following command to load the plist file into launchd:
sudo launchctl bootstrap gui/$(id -u) /Users/test/Library/LaunchAgents/com.test.logTest.plist
pc spec
MacBook Pro
Apple M1
16 GB RAM
macOS 15.3 (Build 24D60)
what I know
The configuration has been set, but the launchd job is not running every minute as expected.
I don't believe there is a mistake with the path.
When I check the job using launchctl list, the job does not appear in the list.
I don't know where the error log files are supposed to be. I checked /var/log/system.log, but there are no error logs.
The .sh file runs fine by itself, but it cannot be executed via launchctl.
Want to ask
What could be the cause of the launchd job not running as expected?
Also, is there a way to check where the logs are being output?
If there is an error in the plist file configuration, which part should be modified?
Specifically, what improvements should be made regarding environment variables and path settings?
If my information is not enough, please tell me what is not enough!
Hi,
I'm trying to create a launch daemon that uses XPC to receive requests from an unprivileged app. Ultimately both components will be written in Go. For now I'm trying to write a PoC in Objective-C to make sure I get everything right, so I'm compiling / signing from the CLI, and writing plist files by hand -- I'm not using XCode.
My current daemon code is pretty much the same as the boilerplate code that XCode generates when creating a new 'XPC Service':
#import <stdio.h>
#include <xpc/xpc.h>
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
xpc_rich_error_t error;
dispatch_queue_t queue = dispatch_queue_create("com.foobar.daemon", DISPATCH_QUEUE_SERIAL);
xpc_listener_t listener = xpc_listener_create(
"com.foobar.daemon",
queue,
XPC_LISTENER_CREATE_NONE,
^(xpc_session_t _Nonnull peer) {
xpc_session_set_incoming_message_handler(peer, ^(xpc_object_t _Nonnull message) {
int64_t firstNumber = xpc_dictionary_get_int64(message, "firstNumber");
int64_t secondNumber = xpc_dictionary_get_int64(message, "secondNumber");
// Create a reply and send it back to the client.
xpc_object_t reply = xpc_dictionary_create_reply(message);
xpc_dictionary_set_int64(reply, "result", firstNumber + secondNumber);
xpc_rich_error_t replyError = xpc_session_send_message(peer, reply);
if (replyError) {
printf("Reply failed, error: %s", xpc_rich_error_copy_description(replyError));
}
});
},
&error);
if (error != NULL) {
printf("ERROR: %s\n", xpc_rich_error_copy_description(error));
exit(1);
}
printf("Created listener: %s", xpc_listener_copy_description(listener));
// Resuming the serviceListener starts this service. This method does not return.
dispatch_main();
return 0;
}
I'm compiling, signing and installing my daemon with the following commands:
build_foobar() {
clang -Wall -x objective-c -o com.foobar.daemon poc/main.m
codesign --force --verify --verbose --options=runtime \
--identifier="com.foobar.daemon" \
--sign="Mac Developer: Albin Kerouanton (XYZ)" \
--entitlements=poc/entitlements.plist \
com.foobar.daemon
}
install_foobar() {
sudo cp com.foobar.daemon /Library/PrivilegedHelperTools/com.foobar.daemon
sudo cp poc/com.foobar.daemon.plist /Library/LaunchDaemons/com.foobar.daemon.plist
sudo launchctl bootout system/com.foobar.daemon || true
sudo launchctl bootstrap system /Library/LaunchDaemons/com.foobar.daemon.plist
}
Here's the content of my entitlements.plist file:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN" "http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd">
<plist version="1.0">
<dict>
<key>com.apple.application-identifier</key>
<string>ABCD.com.foobar.daemon</string>
</dict>
</plist>
And finally, here's my launchd plist file:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN" "http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd">
<plist version="1.0">
<dict>
<key>Label</key>
<string>com.foobar.daemon</string>
<key>Program</key>
<string>/Library/PrivilegedHelperTools/com.foobar.daemon</string>
<key>ProgramArguments</key>
<array>
<string>/Library/PrivilegedHelperTools/com.foobar.daemon</string>
</array>
<key>RunAtLoad</key>
<false/>
<key>StandardOutPath</key>
<string>/tmp/com.foobar.daemon.out.log</string>
<key>StandardErrorPath</key>
<string>/tmp/com.foobar.daemon.err.log</string>
<key>Debug</key>
<true/>
</dict>
</plist>
Whenever I start my service using sudo launchctl start com.foobar.daemon, it exits with the following error message:
ERROR: Unable to activate listener: failed at listener activation with error 1 - Operation not permitted
System logs don't show anything interesting -- they're just repeating the same error message. I tried to add / remove some properties from both the entitlement and the launchd plist file but to no avail.
Any idea what's going wrong?
Testing Environment:
iOS Version: 26.0 Beta 7
Xcode Version: 17.0 Beta 6
Device: iPhone 16 Pro
Description:
We are implementing the new BGContinuedProcessingTask API and are using the wildcard identifier notation as described in the official documentation. Our Info.plist is correctly configured with a permitted identifier pattern, such as com.our-bundle.export.*.
We then register a single launch handler for this exact wildcard pattern. We are performing this registration within a UIViewController, which is a supported pattern as BGContinuedProcessingTask is explicitly exempt from the "register before applicationDidFinishLaunching" requirement, according to the BGTaskScheduler.h header file. The register method correctly returns true, indicating the registration was successful.
However, when we then try to submit a task with a unique identifier that matches this pattern (e.g., com.our-bundle.export.UUID), the BGTaskScheduler.shared.submit() call throws an NSInternalInconsistencyException and terminates the app. The error reason is: 'No launch handler registered for task with identifier com.our-bundle.export.UUID'.
This indicates that the system is not correctly matching the specific, unique identifier from the submit call to the registered wildcard pattern handler. This behavior contradicts the official documentation.
Steps to Reproduce:
Create a new Xcode project.
In Signing & Capabilities, add "Background Modes" (with "Background processing" checked) and "Background GPU Access".
Add a permitted identifier (e.g., "com.company.test.*") to BGTaskSchedulerPermittedIdentifiers in Info.plist.
In a UIViewController's viewDidLoad, register a handler for the wildcard pattern. Check that the register method returns true.
Immediately after, try to submit a BGContinuedProcessingTaskRequest with a unique identifier that matches the pattern.
Expected Results:
The submit call should succeed without crashing, and the task should be scheduled.
Actual Results:
The app crashes immediately upon calling submit(). The console shows an uncaught NSInternalInconsistencyException with the reason: 'No launch handler registered for task with identifier com.company.test.UUID'.
Workaround:
The issue can be bypassed if we register a new handler for each unique identifier immediately before submitting a request with that same unique identifier. This strongly suggests the bug is in the system's wildcard pattern-matching logic.
I'm working on a Mac app that receives a process ID via NSXPCConnection, and I'm trying to figure out the best way to determine whether that process is a native macOS app like Safari—with bundles and all—or just a script launched by something like Node or Python. The executable is signed with a Team ID using codesign.
I was thinking about getting the executable's path as one way to handle it, but I’m wondering if there’s a more reliable method than relying on the folder structure.
Topic:
App & System Services
SubTopic:
Processes & Concurrency
Tags:
XPC
Inter-process communication
I'm developing a macOS console application that uses ODBC to connect to PostgreSQL. The application works fine when run normally, but fails to load the ODBC driver when debugging with LLDB(under root works fine as well).
Error Details
When running the application through LLDB, I get this sandbox denial in the system log (via log stream):
Error 0x0 0 0 kernel: (Sandbox) Sandbox: logd_helper(587) deny(1) file-read-data /opt/homebrew/lib/psqlodbcw.so
The application cannot access the PostgreSQL ODBC driver located at /opt/homebrew/lib/psqlodbcw.so(also tried copy to /usr/local/lib/...).
Environment
macOS Version: Latest Sequoia
LLDB: Using LLDB from Xcode 16.3 (/Applications/Xcode16.3.app/Contents/Developer/usr/bin/lldb)
ODBC Driver: PostgreSQL ODBC driver installed via Homebrew
Code Signing: Application is signed with Apple Development certificate
What is the recommended approach for debugging applications that need to load dynamic libraries?
Are there specific entitlements or configurations that would allow LLDB to access ODBC drivers during debugging sessions?
Any guidance would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you for any assistance!
How can I return the results of a Spotlight query synchronously from a Swift function?
I want to return a [String] that contains the items that match the query, one item per array element.
I specifically want to find all data for Spotlight items in the /Applications folder that have a kMDItemAppStoreAdamID (if there is a better predicate than kMDItemAppStoreAdamID > 0, please let me know).
The following should be the correct query:
let query = NSMetadataQuery()
query.predicate = NSPredicate(format: "kMDItemAppStoreAdamID > 0")
query.searchScopes = ["/Applications"]
I would like to do this for code that can run on macOS 10.13+, which precludes using Swift Concurrency. My project already uses the latest PromiseKit, so I assume that the solution should use that. A bonus solution using Swift Concurrency wouldn't hurt as I will probably switch over sometime in the future, but won't be able to switch soon.
I have written code that can retrieve the Spotlight data as the [String], but I don't know how to return it synchronously from a function; whatever I tried, the query hangs, presumably because I've called various run loop functions at the wrong places.
In case it matters, the app is a macOS command-line app using Swift 5.7 & Swift Argument Parser 1.5.0. The Spotlight data will be output only as text to stdout & stderr, not to any Apple UI elements.
Hello im creating an expo module using this new API, but the problem i found currently testing this functionality is that when the task fails, the notification error doesn't go away and is always showing the failed task notification even if i start a new task and complete that one.
I want to implement this module into the production app but i feel like having always the notification error might confuse our users or find it a bit bothersome.
Is there a way for the users to remove this notification?
Best regards!
I work for a large medical device company.
We have a 1st party BLE enabled medical device that must be very battery efficient. To this end, if a connection is lost, the BLE radio is powered down after 60 seconds and will only turn back on when a physical button on the device is pressed.
I've been tasked with connecting to the device, staying connected to the device, and being able to retrieve data from the device upon a timed action. For instance, this could include a data read and transmission while they sleep. The key part of this is staying reliably connected for extended periods of time.
This is a BYOD setup, and we cannot control power profiles.
I would very much appreciate any information, recommendations, and/or insights into solving this problem.
Thanks!
Topic:
App & System Services
SubTopic:
Processes & Concurrency
Tags:
External Accessory
iOS
Application Services
Core Bluetooth
I am considering to use the BGAppRefreshTask mechanism, and while I think I have read and understood all documentation and hints in this forum about it (especially the limitations), the one thing I do not understand is: how can I debug it? I cannot find a way to trigger the BGAppRefreshTask execution reliably and immediately. I would have expected the Xcode Debug->Simulate Background Fetch menu to do this for me, but it only sends the app into the background.
I am working with the unmodified (except for a few added print()) ColorFeed sample code project from Apple, which schedules a task 15min into the future when it goes to the background. Using a real device, I have not managed to trigger execution of the BGAppRefreshTask more often than once a day so far.
Surely, there must be a way to trigger it much more often solely for debugging and development purposes (I am totally happy with all restrictions for the final app).
So what detail am I missing here?
Dear Apple:
We are developing an app for file sharing between mobile devices. We want to create an iOS app that can continue sharing files with other devices even when it is running in the background. We are using WLAN channels for file sharing. Could you please advise on which background persistence measures we should use to ensure the iOS app can maintain file transfer when it goes to the background? Thank you.
In iOS Background Execution limits, I see this:
When the user ‘force quits’ an app by swiping up in the multitasking UI, iOS interprets that to mean that the user doesn’t want the app running at all. iOS also sets a flag that prevents the app from being launched in the background. That flag gets cleared when the user next launches the app manually.
However, I see that when I close an app on iPadOS 26 with the red X, the app doesn't appear in the multitasking UI. So are they treated as force closes and prevented from running background tasks?
So i am pretty new to Xcode, but i have been using Python and other language for some while. But I am quite new to the game of view and view control. So it may be that i have over complicated this a bit - and it may be that I have some wrong understanding of the dependencies and appcontroller (that i thought would be a good idea). So here we have a main file we call it app.swift, we have a startupmanager.swift, a appcoordinator and a dependeciescontainer. But it may be that this is either a overkill - or that I am doing it wrong.
So my thought was that i had a dependeciecontainer, a appcoordinator for the views and a startupmanager that controll the initialized fetching. I have controlled the memory when i run it - checking if it is higher, lower eg - but it was first when i did my 2 days profile i saw a lot of new errors, like this: Fikser(7291,0x204e516c0) malloc: xzm: failed to initialize deferred reclamation buffer (46). and i also get macro errors, probably from the @Query in my feedview.
So my thought was that a depencecie manager and a startupmanager was a good idea together with a app coordinator.
But maybe I am wrong - maybe this is not a good idea? Or maybe I am doing some things twice? I have added a lot of prints and debugs for checking. But it seems that it starts off to heavy?
import SwiftUI
import Combine
@MainActor
class AppCoordinator: ObservableObject {
@Published var isLoggedIn: Bool = false
private var authManager: AuthenticationManager = .shared
private var cancellables = Set<AnyCancellable>()
private let startupManager: StartupManager
private let container: DependencyContainer
@Published var path = NavigationPath()
enum Screen: Hashable, Identifiable {
case profile
case activeJobs
case offers
case message
var id: Self { self }
}
init(container: DependencyContainer) {
self.container = container
self.startupManager = container.makeStartupManager()
setupObserving()
startupManager.start()
print("AppCoordinator initialized!")
}
private func setupObserving() {
authManager.$isAuthenticated
.receive(on: RunLoop.main)
.sink { [weak self] isAuthenticated in
self?.isLoggedIn = isAuthenticated
}
.store(in: &cancellables)
}
func userDidLogout() {
authManager.logout()
path.removeLast(path.count)
}
func showProfile() {
path.append(Screen.profile)
}
func showActiveJobs() {
path.append(Screen.activeJobs)
}
func showOffers() {
path.append(Screen.offers)
}
func showMessage() {
path.append(Screen.message)
}
@ViewBuilder
func viewForDestination(_ destination: Screen) -> some View {
switch destination {
case .profile:
ProfileView()
case .activeJobs:
ActiveJobsView()
case .offers:
OffersView()
case .message:
ChatView()
}
}
@ViewBuilder
func viewForJob(_ job: Job) -> some View {
PostDetailView(
job: job,
jobUserDetailsRepository: container.makeJobUserDetailsRepository()
)
}
@ViewBuilder
func viewForProfileSubview(_ destination: ProfileView.ProfileSubviews) -> some View {
switch destination{
case .personalSettings:
PersonalSettingView()
case .historicData:
HistoricDataView()
case .transactions:
TransactionView()
case .helpCenter:
HelpcenterView()
case .helpContract:
HelpContractView()
}
}
enum HomeBarDestinations: Hashable, Identifiable {
case postJob
case jobPosting
var id: Self { self }
}
@ViewBuilder
func viewForHomeBar(_ destination: HomeBarView.HomeBarDestinations) -> some View {
switch destination {
case .postJob:
PostJobView()
}
}
}
import Apollo
import FikserAPI
import SwiftData
class DependencyContainer {
static var shared: DependencyContainer!
private let modelContainer: ModelContainer
static func initialize(with modelContainer: ModelContainer) {
shared = DependencyContainer(modelContainer: modelContainer)
}
private init(modelContainer: ModelContainer) {
self.modelContainer = modelContainer
print("DependencyContainer being initialized at ")
}
@MainActor
private lazy var userData: UserData = {
return UserData(apollo: Network.shared.apollo)
}()
@MainActor
private lazy var userDetailsRepository: UserDetailsRepository = {
return UserDetailsRepository(userData: makeUserData())
}()
@MainActor
private lazy var jobData: JobData = {
return JobData(apollo: Network.shared.apollo)
}()
@MainActor
private lazy var jobRepository: JobRepository = {
return JobRepository(jobData: makeJobData(), modelContainer: modelContainer)
}()
@MainActor
func makeUserData() -> UserData {
return userData
}
@MainActor
func makeUserDetailsRepository() -> UserDetailsRepository {
return userDetailsRepository
}
@MainActor
func makeStartupManager() -> StartupManager {
return StartupManager(
userDetailsRepository: makeUserDetailsRepository(),
jobRepository: makeJobRepository(),
authManager: AuthenticationManager.shared,
lastUpdateRepository: makeLastUpdateRepository()
)
}
@MainActor
func makeJobData() -> JobData {
return jobData
}
@MainActor
func makeJobRepository() -> any JobRepositoryProtocol {
return jobRepository
}
@MainActor
private lazy var jobUserData: JobUserData = {
return JobUserData(apollo: Network.shared.apollo)
}()
@MainActor
private lazy var jobUserDetailsRepository: JobUserDetailsRepository = {
return JobUserDetailsRepository(jobUserData: makeJobUserData())
}()
@MainActor
func makeJobUserData() -> JobUserData {
return jobUserData
}
@MainActor
func makeJobUserDetailsRepository() -> JobUserDetailsRepository {
return jobUserDetailsRepository
}
@MainActor
private lazy var lastUpdateData: LastUpdateData = {
return LastUpdateData(apollo: Network.shared.apollo)
}()
@MainActor
private lazy var lastUpdateRepository: LastUpdateRepository = {
return LastUpdateRepository(lastUpdateData: makeLastUpdateData())
}()
@MainActor
func makeLastUpdateData() -> LastUpdateData {
return lastUpdateData
}
@MainActor
func makeLastUpdateRepository() -> LastUpdateRepository {
return lastUpdateRepository
}
}```
Topic:
App & System Services
SubTopic:
Processes & Concurrency
Some users of my Mac app are complaining of redrawing delays. Based on what I see in logs, my GCD timer event handlers are not being run in a timely manner although the runloop is still pumping events: sometimes 500ms pass before a 15ms timer runs. During this time, many keypresses are routed through -[NSApplication sendEvent:], which is how I know it's not locked up in synchronous code.
This issue has not been reported in older versions of macOS.
I start the timer like this:
_gcdUpdateTimer = dispatch_source_create(DISPATCH_SOURCE_TYPE_TIMER, 0, 0, dispatch_get_main_queue());
dispatch_source_set_timer(_gcdUpdateTimer,
dispatch_time(DISPATCH_TIME_NOW, period * NSEC_PER_SEC),
period * NSEC_PER_SEC,
0.0005 * NSEC_PER_SEC);
dispatch_source_set_event_handler(_gcdUpdateTimer, ^{
…redraw…
});
Hello, I'm developing a Mac application that uses a network extension. I'm trying to implement XPC to pass data between my main app and system extension and I'm using the SimpleFirewall demo app as a guide to do this. One thing I can't understand is how the ViewController in the SimpleFirewall main app has access to the class IPCConnection in the SimpleFirewallExtension without it being public and without SimpleFirewallExtension being imported in ViewController.
Topic:
App & System Services
SubTopic:
Processes & Concurrency
Tags:
XPC
System Extensions
Network Extension