Popping Sound

Question, if I am writing async code in the notification service extension, I understand it terminates after 30 seconds. Correct, though I always recommend that anyone setting up things like timeouts use a shorter value just in case. So I'd probably build around ~25s, not 30s. If I want to wait until these async methods finish before calling the content handler, I believe an option I have is to use dispatch groups. However, I am open to other solutions if there are better options. What are you actually waiting on? In general, I've become very nervous anytime I see code that uses dispatch groups because they seem to be used as a slightly awkward band-aid trying to make something work that doesn't really want to work. Case in point here, the main reason an NSE would be waiting is network activity, in which case the simpler solution would be to simply set the right timeout on that network activity. Having said that.... My question is, if I use dispatch groups, is there any issue in using the main queue here? Or

The main point here is that to be able to change the style of a map in iOS 14, you must use MKMapView. Another thing to note is that SwiftUI's Map and MKMapView actually rely on the same underlying technologies. The key difference is that MKMapView (UIKit) gives you much more granular control, whereas the SwiftUI Map is a higher-level, declarative wrapper that, in iOS 14, simply doesn't expose the needed map style API. Remember, SwiftUI was only a year old at that point, so it didn't have half the features it does today, including proper integration with other frameworks. Regarding tracking and user-following: you can definitely replicate this behaviour using MKMapView. It just takes a bit more code, but a quick skim through the documentation will point you in the right direction. You can make use of view properties and delegate methods to handle your tracking logic as needed, as well as any additional features you want to implement. For example, you can set userTrackingMode to .follow or .followWithHeading,

I’m a newbie on this and playing with Arduino Nano with Matter examples, which, by default, generate Matter Bridges named Matter Accessory. I’ve found that the best way to delete test matter devices is to delete the Bridge within the devices. Long click the accessory, choose Accessory Settings from the pop-up menu, scroll down to Bridge and select that. Now you’ll be in the bridge setting and can scroll down there to get to delete bridge. What I don’t know how to do is delete bridges, like those shown here, when you don’t have an associated accessory (device) interface.

Okay, after more research and reading these articles: Use a braille display with VoiceOver on iPhone Change your VoiceOver settings on iPhone It sounds like braille displays just use the VoiceOver output and whether it reads parentheses is part of the device's Verbosity › Punctuation setting. Then looking into whether I can set that programmatically, I came across this .speechAlwaysIncludesPuncturation() modifier, which may do exactly what I want. I'll give that a try report back! 🤞

At the time of posting, this problem still persist. I had to downgrade the Swift Version Language that the Swift Compiler uses from Swift 6 to Swift 5. As soon as I invoke this function, I get hosed and the app crashes: UNUserNotificationCenter.current().requestAuthorization(options: [.alert, .sound, .badge]) { granted, error in // ... } I hear that this is a known Apple Bug. Is this true?

Bumping this because I haven't found where access these tools either! I'm surprised the announcement only mentioned AAX/Pro Tools and Davinci Resolve. (And no mention of Logic Pro?) Please add support AU/VST3 versions to supports DAWs like REAPER, which has become a go-to audio editor for higher order ambisonic and spatial work.

I can give you a good answer for this: [quote='790333021, jonayuan, /thread/790333, /profile/jonayuan'] When exactly does the biometric authentication permission pop-up appear for users - is it when calling canEvaluatePolicy(…) or evaluatePolicy(…)? [/quote] The latter. The purpose of canEvaluatePolicy(…) is to tell you whether a policy is supported or not. It’s the act of evaluating that policy that triggers side effects, like a biometrics user interaction. [quote='790333021, jonayuan, /thread/790333, /profile/jonayuan'] Do I need to include a privacy string in my app to use the LAContext's canEvaluatePolicy(…) function? [/quote] Now, that’s a more subtle question. There’s an implicit assumption in the API that folks would only call canEvaluatePolicy(…) because they want to, at some point, evaluate a policy, and that obviously requires a privacy string. It’s easy to imagine the Local Authentication implementation requiring the privacy string in your unusal case. Your tests confirm that the current i