smb big sur

Game development is complex. 😉And what should those be if not classes? Structs? Stateless functions? There's just no way around a decent object model, and personally I find GK's class hierarchy almost too condensed.I'm working on GameplayKit demos over the coming weeks/months. Don't expect big new tutorials and demos from Apple - what you see in the beta is usually what you get (ie consider how Adventure is still the main and almost only SpriteKit demo today). The community will provide the rest.Currently I'm finishing a GKMinmaxStrategist demo. Follow TilemapKit.com or my Twitter account for updates.

Hello I'm no profecional on apple computers I just do what I can to survibe on this world,at your question MAYBE on my own words, on my own ideas I don't want to cause comflite with any body I just want to expres my ideas maybe help you.maybe you have some kind of virues I know that apple don't have virus but lets call like that,so times on my computer I want to do things and looks like some one is controling my computer,so I desconect the cable or vires I clean the history and Recent Iteams on the desk top I destroy any file my pc is encryted ( there is too many ways that some one can atack your pc one of them that I see when I use my computer and then I stop using I alwasy disconect the internet or turn off the vireles when I come back I just conect the cable or turn on the vireless but when I turn on the vireles or take out the cable internet I always clean history search top left of the screen.so If I was you, I will do this disconect cable internet or turn off win fithen I make another user account with

Unfortunately, the relationship between the indexes and the values isn't fixed.Maybe it'll be clearer if I explain the Obj-C construct I'm converting. The old code has a large number of C-style arrays, some as ivars, some as local variables. They're indexed by integers, but in most cases the indexes are cases of a number of enums. Something like: typedef enum: NSUInteger { CompassPointNorth = 1, CompassPointSouth, CompassPointEast, CompassPointWest, CompassPointCount } CompassPoint; … MyDirection* directions [CompassPoint]; … for (i = 0; i < CompassPointCount; i++) directions [i] = [[MyDirection alloc] init… ];and so on.I can use Swift arrays and enums instead, but then I have to use '.rawValue' everywhere to index the array, and there's a big danger of using the wrong enum in any given case, since converting to an Int basically discards type checking. I can use Swift dictionaries instead, with an enum-valued key, and I get strict type checking, but then I have to use ! on every subscripting opera

Sorry it took so long for me to get back to this - I marked ahltorp's answer as correct as it's the only thing that I found so far that could improve the speed and I got similar results to that reported by ahltorp. The bottom line is my double nested loop drops from 250 ms to 65 ms using ahltorp's suggestion.Details below:To recap, my question is essentially: What is the fastest way to run an empty double nested loop in Swift through the children nodes of an SKSpriteNode in debug mode?My system is currently XCode Beta 7.0 (so Swift 2), a Mac Mini 2012, and an iPad MiniI initialized the loop like this:let dummyNode = SKSpriteNode()for var i = 0; i < 200; ++i{ dummyNode.addChild( SKSpriteNode() )}I then ran 100 cycles of the following code and manually clocked it using a break point before and after: for object1 in dummyNode.children { for object2 in dummyNode.children { } }Now using ahltorp's suggestion I ran this: let objects = Array(dummyNode.children) for object1 in objects { for object2 in objects { } }

JR:DTS is for code level support only, meaning they don't get into code signing or pre-reviews, etc. You contact them with a specific issue in a specific project, then hand over a working project that demonstrates the issue, when asked. Don't expect a lot of dialog, so try to stay on topic.I've used DTS twice in the past and both times they solved things for me, but it took up to two weeks one time. I just made sure to be concise with my problem and patient with the process....seeing as I'd tried to solve one problem for 3 months, by just working on other things and coming back to it when I had new info, etc., a couple more weeks wasn't a big deal at that time. It's a bit like having a one-on-one at WWDC, but the interaction is remote and things don't happen as quite as fast. You get two incidents per year with your dev account and lose them if you don't use them...they don't carry over, but you get two more the next time. Some devs will use them right at the end for certain lower priority issues, bu

It seems like it would be a fairly big leap to allow this. Normally, you need to add protocol conformance explicitly to each type. These protocol conformance protocol extensions would essentially be declaring protocol conformance for all types that implement another protocol. While this would be convenient in many cases, it also makes the system substantially more complex, since protocol conformance would no longer be fully explicit, but could instead happen through spooky action at a distance.A workaround is to extend a protocol with an implementation for when Self implements another protocol. In that case, each type would still have to opt in to conformance and be able to override the implementation, but you can still write the default implementation once:extension CustomStringConvertible where Self: Test { ... }

I think that is not possible. The only big problem with turning off the screen is when you need Siri in your app. Siri waits too long before the text appears on the screen. The iPhone filters much better the background noise. But on the watch it thinks that you are not finished yet with your spoken text and waits before it analyzes the text. And then the screen turns off before you can check it.

Ok, after seeking help on both the raywenderlich and this forum and getting none, I've kind of given up. There may not be an answer. So I am thinking about a complete rewrite and I would like some opinion on this. First of all, I know that Apple is phasing out Objective C and I will have to learn Swift sooner or later. But I have heard that it is similar to Microsoft C# which I know very well. So maybe not so bad to learn. What I would like to know from all of you is do you think it is a good idea to just start over and rewrite the entire app in Swift? It's not a trivial app. There are lots of custom mathematical functions. Is it a big job to port over all those functions to Swift? There are also lots of images. Has anyone ever done anything like this?I'm going to also post this on the Apple forum.Thanks for your opinion.

Hahaha! That is pretty funny. I've always said that developers should always have the FIRST taste of all the fun, and YES I KNOW developer programs are for app makers and all that blah blah. But like aasatt said, why get us all hyped up and make this big announcement of an official release at WWDC, then leave us hanging. I'm also aware that people are going to tell me that I shouldn't be running beta on my daily device. Well to me that's the best way to do what I do with betas! I'm in the Military as well so I'm not always home long enough to fire up additional components to do what I need, so I put it on the device I use the most with the expectations of bugs and apps not working. I just didn't expect they'd leave out Apple Music for us on the official release date and push it to iOS 8. Just my opinion though.

Now that I re-read the question, I see that there is the thought that the application receipt, in_app array is showing the incomplete transactions - this is not the case. As I mentioned in my previous response, the in_app array is a living history of purchases made by the user with the app. In a different forum posting, the question was asked - how big can the application receipt grow to. I checked with StoreKit engineering and there is no limit.rich kubota - rkubota@apple.comdeveloper technical support CoreOS/Hardware/MFI