StoreKit

RSS for tag

Support in-app purchases and interactions with the App Store using StoreKit.

StoreKit Documentation

Posts under StoreKit subtopic

Post

Replies

Boosts

Views

Activity

SKStoreReviewController.requestReview limits not working?
We're currently having an issue with our app where the review prompt is displaying for the user too often. I know the documentation says that: If the person hasn’t rated or reviewed your app on this device, StoreKit displays the ratings and review request a maximum of three times within a 365-day period. If the person has rated or reviewed your app on this device, StoreKit displays the ratings and review request if the app version is new, and if more than 365 days have passed since the person’s previous review. From this post I can see that there's an updated API that is recommended AppStore.requestReview(in:). Is there a currently known bug with the SKStoreReviewController version that would cause the review prompt to display outside of the limitations? Locally we're seeing a limit of 3 prompts in the same session but a few days later, we get the same 3 prompt limit when it's should have been limited for another year. Does using the AppStore version just fix our issue? Is it actually a different API?
0
0
33
21h
original_transaction_id associated to web_order_line_item_id of auto-renewable subscription changed
Our app offers auto-renewable subscriptions using StoreKit Original API for In-App Purchase and App Store Server Notifications V1. Starting around 2025-03-15, we found some cases where original_transaction_id which was associated to web_order_line_item_id of already purchased subscription had changed in the receipt information of verifyReceipt response or App Store Server Notifications V1. The detailed steps are: Around February 2025, re-purchase from the app the same subscription product which was canceled and expired some time ago, using StoreKit Original API for In-App Purchase Receive the following 2 notifications from App Store Server Notifications V1 almost at the same time INITIAL_BUY DID_CHANGE_RENEWAL_STATUS In both notifications, latest_receipt_info contains the receipt for the re-purchased subscription period with new original_transaction_id and web_order_line_item_id pending_renewal_info contains both new original_transaction_id and original one which was generated at first purchase, and original one has "is_in_billing_retry_period": "1" Starting around 2025-03-15, the following happens When we receive another "DID_CHANGE_RENEWAL_STATUS" notification from App Store Server Notifications V1, original_transaction_id which is associated to web_order_line_item_id of the re-purchased subscription period has changed back to the original one (the one which was generated at first purchase) in latest_receipt_info. When we call verifyReceipt with the receipt obtained from appStoreReceiptURL, the response does not seem to contain new original_transaction_id which was generated at re-purchase We have some questions regarding this original_transaction_id behavior. When a user re-purchase the same subscription product which was canceled and expired some time ago, it seems that new original_transaction_id is generated. Is this an expected behavior? If yes, it seems that, at some point, original_transaction_id which is associated to web_order_line_item_id of the re-purchased subscription changed back to the original original_transaction_id which had been generated at first purchase. Is this an expected behavior? What triggers the original_transaction_id change to the original one? Is it related to some user actions or subscription status change?
4
0
476
1d
watchOS-Only App First Submission — IAP Rejected Multiple Times, Works in TestFlight Sandbox but Not in Review
Hi everyone, I'm submitting my watchOS-only app and its In-App Purchase for the very first time (both app and IAP submitted simultaneously). After multiple rejections, I still can't resolve the issue and would appreciate any guidance. Environment: App type: watchOS-only (no iOS companion app) First submission of both the app and IAP IAP type: Non-Consumable, Product Apple ID: 6770497337 The problem: The reviewer (App Review) states that the IAP product information cannot be retrieved in the review environment. According to the reviewer, they are testing in the production environment, not the sandbox. However: In my TestFlight build, the app correctly retrieves the IAP product I have successfully completed the full purchase flow using a sandbox account All business agreements (including Paid Apps Agreement) are accepted and active in The Bundle ID and Product ID are correctly configured in both Xcode and App Store Connect Current IAP status in App Store Connect: Overall status: "Developer Action Needed" All localizations (English US/UK/AU/CA, Japanese, Simplified Chinese, Traditional Chinese): "Rejected" No specific rejection reason is shown anywhere in App Store Connect Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you! 🙏
1
0
45
1d
Non-Consumable IAP stuck in ‘Developer Action Required’ – cannot link to version page
My Non-Consumable IAP was rejected with Guideline 3.1.1 and now has status ‘Developer Action Required’. The problem: On the version page in App Store Connect, the ‘In-App Purchases and Subscriptions’ section does not appear at the bottom. I cannot link the IAP to a new version submission. Every time I submit a new binary, Apple approves the app version but rejects the IAP afterward — even though I have no way to attach it to the version in the first place. This seems to be a circular issue: the IAP doesn’t appear on the version page because of its current status, but the only way to fix the status is to submit it with a new version. Has anyone experienced this and found a solution? Any help appreciated!​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​
0
0
50
3d
DID_FAIL_TO_RENEW (v2 Notifcation)
Hello, I would like to understand the possible end-user journey when a subscription transitions into the DID_FAIL_TO_RENEW state. During this period—when the App Store continues to retry billing for up to 60 days, or until the user resolves the billing issue or cancels the subscription is the user allowed to purchase the same subscription again? If so, my understanding is that this would follow a resubscribe flow, rather than an initial purchase flow. Could you please confirm and provide further details on how this scenario is expected to behave?
0
0
156
5d
SKPaymentQueue.restoreCompletedTransactions returns 0 transactions for auto-renewable subscriptions on iOS 26.4
Is anybody else seeing this? Since iOS 26.4, calling SKPaymentQueue.restoreCompletedTransactions() no longer returns any transactions for active auto-renewable subscriptions. The success callback is invoked correctly, but the transactions array is empty. The same device and the same Apple ID return the expected transactions on iOS 26.3.1 and earlier. Environment Affected: iOS 26.4.x (confirmed on 26.4.2) Working: iOS 26.3.1 and earlier Product type: Auto-renewable subscriptions Deployment target: iOS 14.0 Steps to reproduce Have an active auto-renewable subscription on an Apple ID (sandbox or production) Run on a device with iOS 26.4 or later Call SKPaymentQueue.default().restoreCompletedTransactions() (or the equivalent via a wrapper such as RMStore) Observe the paymentQueueRestoreCompletedTransactionsFinished delegate callback Expected behaviour The delegate receives the restored transactions via paymentQueue(_:updatedTransactions:) before paymentQueueRestoreCompletedTransactionsFinished is called, as documented. Actual behaviour paymentQueueRestoreCompletedTransactionsFinished is called immediately with no prior transaction updates. The transactions array is empty.
0
0
83
5d
Can't verify my identity for sandbox can not receive verification code
I'm trying to use a sandbox account, and am stuck on the verification stage. My primary number (my personal iPhone phone number) has been used too many time, as I've used it to set up many devices. My personal mobile number is tied to a physical SIM in my iPhone 12 Pro. Now I'm trying to use a Freedom Mobile eSIM, and can successfully send and received texts to/from myself, other people, to/from Freedom Mobile as well. Setting up the sandbox account (my email address with a +3 at the end of it) I choose USE A DIFFERENT NUMBER and my eSIM number is shown along with my "Freedom" description of the eSIM right below it. The Verification Code page appears, but I never get a verification code. I click on DID NOT GET A VERIFICATION CODE? and try trigger a phone call and do not get that either. I've reset my eSIM, I've reset my iPhone's networking, I've rebooted my phone many times, I've un/re-installed the app and TestFlight. I'm willing to try anything here, but is it possible because my personal mobile number (which is tied to my personal Apple ID) not having any spare slots (or whatever we call them) that is why the eSIM is also being impeded, although not telling me that is why? Can Apple increase the number of verifications I can do with my primary mobile number? So I can nevermind this eSIM? Can Apple try text me on my eSIM, and see if there is some sort of generic Apple issue with it and not just this sandbox system?
2
0
246
5d
AppTransaction.shared throws StoreKitError code=2 in macOS TestFlight while deviceVerificationID is available
I am implementing device authentication for a macOS app. Our iOS app uses App Attest, but App Attest is not available on macOS, so we are evaluating StoreKit's AppTransaction plus AppStore.deviceVerificationID as the macOS equivalent signal. The issue: in a macOS app installed through TestFlight, AppStore.deviceVerificationID is available, but AppTransaction.shared throws StoreKitError code=2. I reproduced this in a focused standalone macOS test app with no backend and no custom dependencies. Environment: Platform: macOS Distribution: TestFlight App Store Connect app ID: 6769568350 Bundle ID: com.soundcity.AppTransactionProbe App version: 1.0 Build: 1 Observed output from the TestFlight-installed app: Bundle ID: com.soundcity.AppTransactionProbe App version: 1.0 Build: 1 deviceVerificationID available: true deviceVerificationID prefix: CA91ED5D... AppTransaction.shared threw error: StoreKitError; domain=StoreKit.StoreKitError; code=2 The relevant code path is essentially: import StoreKit let deviceVerificationID = try? AppStore.deviceVerificationID let appTransaction = try await AppTransaction.shared In the TestFlight-installed build: AppStore.deviceVerificationID succeeds. AppTransaction.shared throws StoreKitError code=2. Questions: Is AppTransaction.shared expected to work for macOS apps distributed through TestFlight? If yes, what does StoreKitError code=2 indicate in this context, and what setup might be missing? If no, is there an Apple-supported way to obtain an AppTransaction JWS, or equivalent signed App Store/TestFlight app-install assertion, for macOS TestFlight builds? For macOS apps that need a device-bound trust signal comparable to iOS App Attest, is AppStore.deviceVerificationID intended to be used without AppTransaction.shared, or should these APIs be used together? I have a focused Xcode test project that demonstrates the issue and can share it if helpful.
0
0
133
1w
Wrong value for storekit custom purchase link allowed regions entitlement
Greetings fellow devs, After accepting the Alternative Terms Addendum for Apps in the EU and adding the Storekit External Purchases or Offers capability via App Store Connect in our app identifier, the entitlement showing up in xcode is com.apple.developer.storekit.custom-purchase-link.allowed-regions and has the value 'jp'. How can we change the value for that entitlement to 'gr'? We tried changing it in xcode, but we get the error <Provisioning profile "iOS Team Provisioning Profile: [app identifier]" doesn't match the entitlements file's value for the com.apple.developer.storekit.custom-purchase-link.allowed-regions entitlement.>. In Certificates, Identifiers and Profiles in the developer account there is no way to configure that capability. We sent a request to support and they only gave a link to documentation and to the forum here. We have a completed every business agreement requested and we have chosen Greece as the organisation region and the app's availability region wherever possible. We haven't found anywhere that Japan would be chosen to explain the entitlement given. So where can this entitlement about allowed regions be configured? Xcode version is 16.4 and iOS minimum deployments is 18
2
0
223
1w
StoreKit2 does not provide an update when subscription was cancelled
I am testing a situation when user cancels auto renewable subscription (via StoreKit->Manage Transactions window). The problem is StoreKit2 does not provide an update when subscription was cancelled. I started using demo from apple developer.apple.com/documentation/storekit/in-app_purchase/implementing_a_store_in_your_app_using_the_storekit_api to test this behaviour in order to get rid of possible mistakes in my implementation, but result is the same - when user cancels subscription app does not receive any storekit events (change in renewal info, update in current entitlements, transaction status - nothing) and only after app's relaunch it fetches everything from scratch and finally updates UI. I tried to wait for up to 20 minutes to check whether this update in transaction (subscription) status will be delivered to the app - still nothing. So the problem, as I see it, is that if user cancels subscription and then does not relaunch the app he can continue to use the app for free for a long time. In this regard I have several questions: is it expected behavior of StoreKit2? If yes - why? Does it happen in Test Flight mode or in production env as well? If it's not expected behavior then is it correct to fix it with checking (lets say once in an hour) user's current entitlements (I tried and it seems to work ok) or there are better solutions?
2
3
685
1w
Can I use Product.products(for:) for display-only on EU storefronts with External Purchase?
I'm implementing EU external purchase using ExternalPurchaseCustomLink. No IAP transactions are offered on EU storefronts — payment happens entirely on our external website. I want to call Product.products(for:) on EU storefronts solely to fetch localized product metadata (displayName, displayPrice, currency formatting) for display. Product.purchase() will never be called. Is it acceptable to use Product.products(for:) for read-only product info display on EU storefronts where only external purchase is offered?
2
0
185
1w
StoreKit 2: Transaction.all and Transaction.currentEntitlements return empty for valid non-consumable purchases in production
FB: https://feedbackassistant.apple.com/feedback/22556883 We're seeing a small number of production users where both Transaction.currentEntitlements and Transaction.all return zero transactions for a valid, active, non-refunded non-consumable IAP. This makes it impossible to restore the purchase via any StoreKit 2 API. Environment: Xcode 26.4 (Build 17E192) iOS 26.4.1 Direct call to SK2 Transactions.all & Flutter in_app_purchase package v3.2.3 (uses SK2 on iOS 15+) Non-consumable IAP (one-time purchase) What we observe: AppStore.sync() triggers but the purchase stream returns 0 transactions Transaction.all returns empty Transaction.currentEntitlements also returns empty User is confirmed on the correct Apple ID Issue reproduces on both iPhone and Mac for the same Apple ID Issue appears to have started recently for users who previously had no problems Debug log from affected production user: [2026-04-20T08:50:10.744115Z] init: iapAvailable=true [2026-04-20T08:50:10.744566Z] init: isPremium=false [2026-04-20T08:50:10.744567Z] init: triggering silent restorePurchases [2026-04-20T08:50:45.974566Z] restore: started [2026-04-20T08:50:45.986848Z] restore: sk2Transactions count=0 [2026-04-20T08:50:45.993004Z] restore: sk2Direct isVerified=false active=null [2026-04-20T08:50:45.993011Z] restore: sk2Direct inconclusive — falling back to standard restore [2026-04-20T08:51:16.000851Z] restore: timed out after 30s — fallback isPremium=false [2026-04-20T08:51:16.000910Z] restore: completed — succeeded=false foundPurchase=false Unable to reproduce in sandbox — Transaction.all works correctly there. Appears specific to production for a small subset of users. Has anyone else seen this?
19
3
1.3k
1w
App Subscription "Confirm with Apple Device" UI
My tvOS app includes the purchase of subscriptions, and I am updating the code with Storekit 2.0. I have seen other apps that present the "Confirm with Apple Device" UI upon selection of a product, but for me I only ever see an alert confirming the purchase. I have tested this using Xcode storekit data and a sandbox account. I have also attempted using Storekit views and passing the UIWindowScene to the purchase(confirmIn: ) parameter, but neither made any difference. Is there some limitation that prevents that UI from showing in debug builds?
0
0
107
1w
Advanced Commerce API pending purchases (consumable)
Hey! App is approved for Advanced Commerce API and have generic product id (Consumable) for digital items purchasing. Uncertain on ho to test flow of pending purchase changing it's status to failed. As by docs BE side handling creating jws for purchase (also creates order to keep track of which items user bought) app with signed jws initiate purchase via product.purchase (send data for advancedCommercialData in options). If product purchase returns status .pending (still no transaction created) I notify BE that for that item (using item SKU) user has pending status for purchase, so that when user attempts to buy this exact item we do not create order duplicate. So the first question - do we need to check if user already made an attempt to buy this item and if item purchasing is pending decline another attempt of buying it? If user sends several requests to buy item under similar SKU for advanced commerce api do all of them will be charged or only one (does apple check SKU value when making a purchase of consumable product via advanced commerce api)? Another question is how to test purchase returns pending status for consumable item via advanced commerce api and then for that item (by SKU) changes status from pending to success? How to know (and eventually) test that after purchase of item via advanced commerce api firstly returns .pending status and then changes to .failure? I want to prevent users from trying to create order duplicates for single item, so when product purchase returns pending status I sent to BE id of item and order for this item on BE side will be marked as pending. So if user tries to buy this exact item once more and status of order on BE still .pending no new purchase will be initiated. So I need to know when purchase changes it's status to failed and then delete pending order on BE side, so that user will have an ability to initiate purchase for this item once more. How to tell whether .pending status for item changes to failed, will I be able in case of failed gather SKU that I previously passed in advancedCommercialData)?
0
0
132
1w
First auto-renewable subscriptions stuck In Review and no In-App Purchases section on version page
My first auto-renewable subscriptions have been stuck in “In Review” for almost two weeks. Apple’s notice says the first subscription must be submitted with a new app version and selected from the “In-App Purchases and Subscriptions” section on the version page. However, my version page does not show that section, even after creating a new version in Prepare for Submission. The only place I can see the subscriptions is from the Subscriptions side tab. The app itself has already been approved, but StoreKit does not return the products in production, so my paywall cannot sell subscriptions. Has anyone found a working fix for this, or does Apple need to manually reset/review the subscription state?
0
1
87
1w
StoreKit 2: currentEntitlements fails for Thai users on iOS 26
On devices configured to use the Buddhist calendar (primarily Thai users) Transaction.currentEntitlements returns an empty async sequence even when the customer holds a legitimate, non-revoked, non-expired entitlement for a non-consumable in-app purchase or subscription. The same transaction is correctly returned by Transaction.all. Switching the device calendar back to Gregorian immediately restores correct behavior: the entitlement is yielded by currentEntitlements again. No reinstall, sign-out, or AppStore.sync() is required. The defect is purely client-side, deterministic, and reproducible at will. Is this a known bug introduced in iOS 26? It is causing me significant problems with in-app purchase validation and restore flows in that market. Is anyone else experiencing this issue?
1
1
277
1w
Production StoreKit silently omits one approved auto-renewable subscription product — sandbox returns it correctly, sudden onset 2026-05-09
Hi all, Reporting an active production issue in case anyone else is seeing the same pattern, or has insight into what could cause this. Symptom As of 2026-05-09 morning, one specific auto-renewable subscription product is silently absent from Production StoreKit responses on our live App Store build. The product is still 'Approved' in App Store Connect, all metadata is intact, no error code is returned — the product simply does not appear in the products array. The other 3 products in the same subscription group continue to work normally. 100% of production users are affected. Setup App: live on App Store, version 1.0.0 (build 8) Subscription group with 4 auto-renewable products: standard_monthly_799 ✅ returns correctly standard_annual_6999 ✅ returns correctly unlimited_monthly_1299 ❌ MISSING from production response unlimited_annual_9999 ✅ returns correctly SDK: purchases_flutter (RevenueCat) → StoreKit Same physical device, same code, same RC config behaves correctly in Sandbox — all 4 products are returned and a sandbox purchase of unlimited_monthly_1299 succeeds. Timeline 2026-05-08: working correctly, purchases succeeding normally 2026-05-09 morning: product silently disappears from production StoreKit responses No app update was submitted between those dates No App Store Connect changes were made Onset was simultaneous across all production users at one timestamp What I've verified App Store Connect: Product status: Approved All territories enabled, all prices configured (no N/A in any territory) Subscription group correctly contains all 4 products No 'Submit for Review' pending changes Product attached to live app version 1.0.0 (8) Tax category: Match to parent app Family Sharing: Off (consistent with the working products) Paid Applications Agreement: Status: Active Banking and Tax forms: Active RevenueCat dashboard: All 4 products show Store Status: Approved Default offering contains all 4 packages iOS attachment for the affected product is intact No warnings or sync errors Sandbox StoreKit (today): flutter run (debug) on physical device → all 4 products returned flutter run --release on physical device → all 4 products returned Sandbox purchase of unlimited_monthly_1299 succeeds Production StoreKit (today, broken): App Store-downloaded 1.0.0 (8) on multiple users' devices Multiple Apple IDs / multiple devices / multiple regions — all reproduce Only unlimited_monthly_1299 affected; other 3 products fine Why this looks server-side Sudden simultaneous onset across all users No code or config change preceded onset Sandbox unaffected, only Production affected Single product affected, not the whole subscription group or app No error returned — silent omission only Cannot reproduce with locally signed builds, only with App Store-distributed binary This pattern is consistent with a server-side product indexing or fronting issue specific to one product in Production StoreKit. As a developer I don't have visibility into Apple's product-serving infrastructure to investigate further — looking for guidance from anyone who has seen this before. Questions for the community Has anyone else seen a single auto-renewable subscription silently drop out of Production StoreKit responses while remaining Approved in ASC, with no error code returned? Is there any internal product-state flag (beyond what's exposed in the ASC UI) that could cause Production StoreKit to silently omit a product? Anything similar to a hidden 'review hold' or 'price tier reconciliation' state? Has the asymmetry between RevenueCat package identifiers (Standard uses RC's $rc_monthly/$rc_annual default identifiers, Premium uses custom premium_monthly/premium_annual identifiers) ever been implicated in this kind of failure? RC support has been notified, but worth asking publicly. For anyone who has resolved a similar issue: what action ended up clearing it — ASC re-save, RC re-sync, Apple Support escalation, or did it self-resolve after Apple-side cache propagation? Filings in progress ASC Contact Us ticket: filed Apple DTS technical incident: filed RevenueCat support ticket: filed Feedback Assistant report: in progress Will update this thread with the resolution path once we have one. Thanks, — Kin Pong Lo (developer, Alice: AI English Tutor)
0
0
157
1w
SKStoreReviewController.requestReview limits not working?
We're currently having an issue with our app where the review prompt is displaying for the user too often. I know the documentation says that: If the person hasn’t rated or reviewed your app on this device, StoreKit displays the ratings and review request a maximum of three times within a 365-day period. If the person has rated or reviewed your app on this device, StoreKit displays the ratings and review request if the app version is new, and if more than 365 days have passed since the person’s previous review. From this post I can see that there's an updated API that is recommended AppStore.requestReview(in:). Is there a currently known bug with the SKStoreReviewController version that would cause the review prompt to display outside of the limitations? Locally we're seeing a limit of 3 prompts in the same session but a few days later, we get the same 3 prompt limit when it's should have been limited for another year. Does using the AppStore version just fix our issue? Is it actually a different API?
Replies
0
Boosts
0
Views
33
Activity
21h
original_transaction_id associated to web_order_line_item_id of auto-renewable subscription changed
Our app offers auto-renewable subscriptions using StoreKit Original API for In-App Purchase and App Store Server Notifications V1. Starting around 2025-03-15, we found some cases where original_transaction_id which was associated to web_order_line_item_id of already purchased subscription had changed in the receipt information of verifyReceipt response or App Store Server Notifications V1. The detailed steps are: Around February 2025, re-purchase from the app the same subscription product which was canceled and expired some time ago, using StoreKit Original API for In-App Purchase Receive the following 2 notifications from App Store Server Notifications V1 almost at the same time INITIAL_BUY DID_CHANGE_RENEWAL_STATUS In both notifications, latest_receipt_info contains the receipt for the re-purchased subscription period with new original_transaction_id and web_order_line_item_id pending_renewal_info contains both new original_transaction_id and original one which was generated at first purchase, and original one has "is_in_billing_retry_period": "1" Starting around 2025-03-15, the following happens When we receive another "DID_CHANGE_RENEWAL_STATUS" notification from App Store Server Notifications V1, original_transaction_id which is associated to web_order_line_item_id of the re-purchased subscription period has changed back to the original one (the one which was generated at first purchase) in latest_receipt_info. When we call verifyReceipt with the receipt obtained from appStoreReceiptURL, the response does not seem to contain new original_transaction_id which was generated at re-purchase We have some questions regarding this original_transaction_id behavior. When a user re-purchase the same subscription product which was canceled and expired some time ago, it seems that new original_transaction_id is generated. Is this an expected behavior? If yes, it seems that, at some point, original_transaction_id which is associated to web_order_line_item_id of the re-purchased subscription changed back to the original original_transaction_id which had been generated at first purchase. Is this an expected behavior? What triggers the original_transaction_id change to the original one? Is it related to some user actions or subscription status change?
Replies
4
Boosts
0
Views
476
Activity
1d
watchOS-Only App First Submission — IAP Rejected Multiple Times, Works in TestFlight Sandbox but Not in Review
Hi everyone, I'm submitting my watchOS-only app and its In-App Purchase for the very first time (both app and IAP submitted simultaneously). After multiple rejections, I still can't resolve the issue and would appreciate any guidance. Environment: App type: watchOS-only (no iOS companion app) First submission of both the app and IAP IAP type: Non-Consumable, Product Apple ID: 6770497337 The problem: The reviewer (App Review) states that the IAP product information cannot be retrieved in the review environment. According to the reviewer, they are testing in the production environment, not the sandbox. However: In my TestFlight build, the app correctly retrieves the IAP product I have successfully completed the full purchase flow using a sandbox account All business agreements (including Paid Apps Agreement) are accepted and active in The Bundle ID and Product ID are correctly configured in both Xcode and App Store Connect Current IAP status in App Store Connect: Overall status: "Developer Action Needed" All localizations (English US/UK/AU/CA, Japanese, Simplified Chinese, Traditional Chinese): "Rejected" No specific rejection reason is shown anywhere in App Store Connect Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you! 🙏
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
45
Activity
1d
Non-Consumable IAP stuck in ‘Developer Action Required’ – cannot link to version page
My Non-Consumable IAP was rejected with Guideline 3.1.1 and now has status ‘Developer Action Required’. The problem: On the version page in App Store Connect, the ‘In-App Purchases and Subscriptions’ section does not appear at the bottom. I cannot link the IAP to a new version submission. Every time I submit a new binary, Apple approves the app version but rejects the IAP afterward — even though I have no way to attach it to the version in the first place. This seems to be a circular issue: the IAP doesn’t appear on the version page because of its current status, but the only way to fix the status is to submit it with a new version. Has anyone experienced this and found a solution? Any help appreciated!​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​
Replies
0
Boosts
0
Views
50
Activity
3d
Auto renewing subscription removed from sale entering "Grace period"
When an auto renewing subscription is "Developer removed from sale", any auto renewal should fail. Will this make the subscription enter billing "Grace Period"? Our expectation is that the rewal would fail without entering a "Grace Period".
Replies
2
Boosts
1
Views
675
Activity
5d
DID_FAIL_TO_RENEW (v2 Notifcation)
Hello, I would like to understand the possible end-user journey when a subscription transitions into the DID_FAIL_TO_RENEW state. During this period—when the App Store continues to retry billing for up to 60 days, or until the user resolves the billing issue or cancels the subscription is the user allowed to purchase the same subscription again? If so, my understanding is that this would follow a resubscribe flow, rather than an initial purchase flow. Could you please confirm and provide further details on how this scenario is expected to behave?
Replies
0
Boosts
0
Views
156
Activity
5d
SKPaymentQueue.restoreCompletedTransactions returns 0 transactions for auto-renewable subscriptions on iOS 26.4
Is anybody else seeing this? Since iOS 26.4, calling SKPaymentQueue.restoreCompletedTransactions() no longer returns any transactions for active auto-renewable subscriptions. The success callback is invoked correctly, but the transactions array is empty. The same device and the same Apple ID return the expected transactions on iOS 26.3.1 and earlier. Environment Affected: iOS 26.4.x (confirmed on 26.4.2) Working: iOS 26.3.1 and earlier Product type: Auto-renewable subscriptions Deployment target: iOS 14.0 Steps to reproduce Have an active auto-renewable subscription on an Apple ID (sandbox or production) Run on a device with iOS 26.4 or later Call SKPaymentQueue.default().restoreCompletedTransactions() (or the equivalent via a wrapper such as RMStore) Observe the paymentQueueRestoreCompletedTransactionsFinished delegate callback Expected behaviour The delegate receives the restored transactions via paymentQueue(_:updatedTransactions:) before paymentQueueRestoreCompletedTransactionsFinished is called, as documented. Actual behaviour paymentQueueRestoreCompletedTransactionsFinished is called immediately with no prior transaction updates. The transactions array is empty.
Replies
0
Boosts
0
Views
83
Activity
5d
Can't verify my identity for sandbox can not receive verification code
I'm trying to use a sandbox account, and am stuck on the verification stage. My primary number (my personal iPhone phone number) has been used too many time, as I've used it to set up many devices. My personal mobile number is tied to a physical SIM in my iPhone 12 Pro. Now I'm trying to use a Freedom Mobile eSIM, and can successfully send and received texts to/from myself, other people, to/from Freedom Mobile as well. Setting up the sandbox account (my email address with a +3 at the end of it) I choose USE A DIFFERENT NUMBER and my eSIM number is shown along with my "Freedom" description of the eSIM right below it. The Verification Code page appears, but I never get a verification code. I click on DID NOT GET A VERIFICATION CODE? and try trigger a phone call and do not get that either. I've reset my eSIM, I've reset my iPhone's networking, I've rebooted my phone many times, I've un/re-installed the app and TestFlight. I'm willing to try anything here, but is it possible because my personal mobile number (which is tied to my personal Apple ID) not having any spare slots (or whatever we call them) that is why the eSIM is also being impeded, although not telling me that is why? Can Apple increase the number of verifications I can do with my primary mobile number? So I can nevermind this eSIM? Can Apple try text me on my eSIM, and see if there is some sort of generic Apple issue with it and not just this sandbox system?
Replies
2
Boosts
0
Views
246
Activity
5d
AppTransaction.shared throws StoreKitError code=2 in macOS TestFlight while deviceVerificationID is available
I am implementing device authentication for a macOS app. Our iOS app uses App Attest, but App Attest is not available on macOS, so we are evaluating StoreKit's AppTransaction plus AppStore.deviceVerificationID as the macOS equivalent signal. The issue: in a macOS app installed through TestFlight, AppStore.deviceVerificationID is available, but AppTransaction.shared throws StoreKitError code=2. I reproduced this in a focused standalone macOS test app with no backend and no custom dependencies. Environment: Platform: macOS Distribution: TestFlight App Store Connect app ID: 6769568350 Bundle ID: com.soundcity.AppTransactionProbe App version: 1.0 Build: 1 Observed output from the TestFlight-installed app: Bundle ID: com.soundcity.AppTransactionProbe App version: 1.0 Build: 1 deviceVerificationID available: true deviceVerificationID prefix: CA91ED5D... AppTransaction.shared threw error: StoreKitError; domain=StoreKit.StoreKitError; code=2 The relevant code path is essentially: import StoreKit let deviceVerificationID = try? AppStore.deviceVerificationID let appTransaction = try await AppTransaction.shared In the TestFlight-installed build: AppStore.deviceVerificationID succeeds. AppTransaction.shared throws StoreKitError code=2. Questions: Is AppTransaction.shared expected to work for macOS apps distributed through TestFlight? If yes, what does StoreKitError code=2 indicate in this context, and what setup might be missing? If no, is there an Apple-supported way to obtain an AppTransaction JWS, or equivalent signed App Store/TestFlight app-install assertion, for macOS TestFlight builds? For macOS apps that need a device-bound trust signal comparable to iOS App Attest, is AppStore.deviceVerificationID intended to be used without AppTransaction.shared, or should these APIs be used together? I have a focused Xcode test project that demonstrates the issue and can share it if helpful.
Replies
0
Boosts
0
Views
133
Activity
1w
StoreKit 2 returns empty products array on device (iPhone) even though IAP is Ready to Submit
Hi, I'm experiencing an issue with StoreKit 2 in my iOS app where Product.products(for:) always returns an empty array on a real iPhone device. 📱 Environment iOS: 26 Device: iPhone 16 pro max Xcode: 26.5 StoreKit: StoreKit 2
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
79
Activity
1w
StoreKit 2 returns empty products array on device (iPhone) even though IAP is Ready to Submit
Hi, I’m experiencing an issue with StoreKit 2 in my iOS app where Product.products(for:) always returns an empty array on a real iPhone device. iOS: 26 Device: iPhone 16 pro Max Xcode: 26.5 StoreKit: StoreKit 2
Replies
0
Boosts
0
Views
94
Activity
1w
Wrong value for storekit custom purchase link allowed regions entitlement
Greetings fellow devs, After accepting the Alternative Terms Addendum for Apps in the EU and adding the Storekit External Purchases or Offers capability via App Store Connect in our app identifier, the entitlement showing up in xcode is com.apple.developer.storekit.custom-purchase-link.allowed-regions and has the value 'jp'. How can we change the value for that entitlement to 'gr'? We tried changing it in xcode, but we get the error <Provisioning profile "iOS Team Provisioning Profile: [app identifier]" doesn't match the entitlements file's value for the com.apple.developer.storekit.custom-purchase-link.allowed-regions entitlement.>. In Certificates, Identifiers and Profiles in the developer account there is no way to configure that capability. We sent a request to support and they only gave a link to documentation and to the forum here. We have a completed every business agreement requested and we have chosen Greece as the organisation region and the app's availability region wherever possible. We haven't found anywhere that Japan would be chosen to explain the entitlement given. So where can this entitlement about allowed regions be configured? Xcode version is 16.4 and iOS minimum deployments is 18
Replies
2
Boosts
0
Views
223
Activity
1w
StoreKit2 does not provide an update when subscription was cancelled
I am testing a situation when user cancels auto renewable subscription (via StoreKit->Manage Transactions window). The problem is StoreKit2 does not provide an update when subscription was cancelled. I started using demo from apple developer.apple.com/documentation/storekit/in-app_purchase/implementing_a_store_in_your_app_using_the_storekit_api to test this behaviour in order to get rid of possible mistakes in my implementation, but result is the same - when user cancels subscription app does not receive any storekit events (change in renewal info, update in current entitlements, transaction status - nothing) and only after app's relaunch it fetches everything from scratch and finally updates UI. I tried to wait for up to 20 minutes to check whether this update in transaction (subscription) status will be delivered to the app - still nothing. So the problem, as I see it, is that if user cancels subscription and then does not relaunch the app he can continue to use the app for free for a long time. In this regard I have several questions: is it expected behavior of StoreKit2? If yes - why? Does it happen in Test Flight mode or in production env as well? If it's not expected behavior then is it correct to fix it with checking (lets say once in an hour) user's current entitlements (I tried and it seems to work ok) or there are better solutions?
Replies
2
Boosts
3
Views
685
Activity
1w
Can I use Product.products(for:) for display-only on EU storefronts with External Purchase?
I'm implementing EU external purchase using ExternalPurchaseCustomLink. No IAP transactions are offered on EU storefronts — payment happens entirely on our external website. I want to call Product.products(for:) on EU storefronts solely to fetch localized product metadata (displayName, displayPrice, currency formatting) for display. Product.purchase() will never be called. Is it acceptable to use Product.products(for:) for read-only product info display on EU storefronts where only external purchase is offered?
Replies
2
Boosts
0
Views
185
Activity
1w
StoreKit 2: Transaction.all and Transaction.currentEntitlements return empty for valid non-consumable purchases in production
FB: https://feedbackassistant.apple.com/feedback/22556883 We're seeing a small number of production users where both Transaction.currentEntitlements and Transaction.all return zero transactions for a valid, active, non-refunded non-consumable IAP. This makes it impossible to restore the purchase via any StoreKit 2 API. Environment: Xcode 26.4 (Build 17E192) iOS 26.4.1 Direct call to SK2 Transactions.all & Flutter in_app_purchase package v3.2.3 (uses SK2 on iOS 15+) Non-consumable IAP (one-time purchase) What we observe: AppStore.sync() triggers but the purchase stream returns 0 transactions Transaction.all returns empty Transaction.currentEntitlements also returns empty User is confirmed on the correct Apple ID Issue reproduces on both iPhone and Mac for the same Apple ID Issue appears to have started recently for users who previously had no problems Debug log from affected production user: [2026-04-20T08:50:10.744115Z] init: iapAvailable=true [2026-04-20T08:50:10.744566Z] init: isPremium=false [2026-04-20T08:50:10.744567Z] init: triggering silent restorePurchases [2026-04-20T08:50:45.974566Z] restore: started [2026-04-20T08:50:45.986848Z] restore: sk2Transactions count=0 [2026-04-20T08:50:45.993004Z] restore: sk2Direct isVerified=false active=null [2026-04-20T08:50:45.993011Z] restore: sk2Direct inconclusive — falling back to standard restore [2026-04-20T08:51:16.000851Z] restore: timed out after 30s — fallback isPremium=false [2026-04-20T08:51:16.000910Z] restore: completed — succeeded=false foundPurchase=false Unable to reproduce in sandbox — Transaction.all works correctly there. Appears specific to production for a small subset of users. Has anyone else seen this?
Replies
19
Boosts
3
Views
1.3k
Activity
1w
App Subscription "Confirm with Apple Device" UI
My tvOS app includes the purchase of subscriptions, and I am updating the code with Storekit 2.0. I have seen other apps that present the "Confirm with Apple Device" UI upon selection of a product, but for me I only ever see an alert confirming the purchase. I have tested this using Xcode storekit data and a sandbox account. I have also attempted using Storekit views and passing the UIWindowScene to the purchase(confirmIn: ) parameter, but neither made any difference. Is there some limitation that prevents that UI from showing in debug builds?
Replies
0
Boosts
0
Views
107
Activity
1w
Advanced Commerce API pending purchases (consumable)
Hey! App is approved for Advanced Commerce API and have generic product id (Consumable) for digital items purchasing. Uncertain on ho to test flow of pending purchase changing it's status to failed. As by docs BE side handling creating jws for purchase (also creates order to keep track of which items user bought) app with signed jws initiate purchase via product.purchase (send data for advancedCommercialData in options). If product purchase returns status .pending (still no transaction created) I notify BE that for that item (using item SKU) user has pending status for purchase, so that when user attempts to buy this exact item we do not create order duplicate. So the first question - do we need to check if user already made an attempt to buy this item and if item purchasing is pending decline another attempt of buying it? If user sends several requests to buy item under similar SKU for advanced commerce api do all of them will be charged or only one (does apple check SKU value when making a purchase of consumable product via advanced commerce api)? Another question is how to test purchase returns pending status for consumable item via advanced commerce api and then for that item (by SKU) changes status from pending to success? How to know (and eventually) test that after purchase of item via advanced commerce api firstly returns .pending status and then changes to .failure? I want to prevent users from trying to create order duplicates for single item, so when product purchase returns pending status I sent to BE id of item and order for this item on BE side will be marked as pending. So if user tries to buy this exact item once more and status of order on BE still .pending no new purchase will be initiated. So I need to know when purchase changes it's status to failed and then delete pending order on BE side, so that user will have an ability to initiate purchase for this item once more. How to tell whether .pending status for item changes to failed, will I be able in case of failed gather SKU that I previously passed in advancedCommercialData)?
Replies
0
Boosts
0
Views
132
Activity
1w
First auto-renewable subscriptions stuck In Review and no In-App Purchases section on version page
My first auto-renewable subscriptions have been stuck in “In Review” for almost two weeks. Apple’s notice says the first subscription must be submitted with a new app version and selected from the “In-App Purchases and Subscriptions” section on the version page. However, my version page does not show that section, even after creating a new version in Prepare for Submission. The only place I can see the subscriptions is from the Subscriptions side tab. The app itself has already been approved, but StoreKit does not return the products in production, so my paywall cannot sell subscriptions. Has anyone found a working fix for this, or does Apple need to manually reset/review the subscription state?
Replies
0
Boosts
1
Views
87
Activity
1w
StoreKit 2: currentEntitlements fails for Thai users on iOS 26
On devices configured to use the Buddhist calendar (primarily Thai users) Transaction.currentEntitlements returns an empty async sequence even when the customer holds a legitimate, non-revoked, non-expired entitlement for a non-consumable in-app purchase or subscription. The same transaction is correctly returned by Transaction.all. Switching the device calendar back to Gregorian immediately restores correct behavior: the entitlement is yielded by currentEntitlements again. No reinstall, sign-out, or AppStore.sync() is required. The defect is purely client-side, deterministic, and reproducible at will. Is this a known bug introduced in iOS 26? It is causing me significant problems with in-app purchase validation and restore flows in that market. Is anyone else experiencing this issue?
Replies
1
Boosts
1
Views
277
Activity
1w
Production StoreKit silently omits one approved auto-renewable subscription product — sandbox returns it correctly, sudden onset 2026-05-09
Hi all, Reporting an active production issue in case anyone else is seeing the same pattern, or has insight into what could cause this. Symptom As of 2026-05-09 morning, one specific auto-renewable subscription product is silently absent from Production StoreKit responses on our live App Store build. The product is still 'Approved' in App Store Connect, all metadata is intact, no error code is returned — the product simply does not appear in the products array. The other 3 products in the same subscription group continue to work normally. 100% of production users are affected. Setup App: live on App Store, version 1.0.0 (build 8) Subscription group with 4 auto-renewable products: standard_monthly_799 ✅ returns correctly standard_annual_6999 ✅ returns correctly unlimited_monthly_1299 ❌ MISSING from production response unlimited_annual_9999 ✅ returns correctly SDK: purchases_flutter (RevenueCat) → StoreKit Same physical device, same code, same RC config behaves correctly in Sandbox — all 4 products are returned and a sandbox purchase of unlimited_monthly_1299 succeeds. Timeline 2026-05-08: working correctly, purchases succeeding normally 2026-05-09 morning: product silently disappears from production StoreKit responses No app update was submitted between those dates No App Store Connect changes were made Onset was simultaneous across all production users at one timestamp What I've verified App Store Connect: Product status: Approved All territories enabled, all prices configured (no N/A in any territory) Subscription group correctly contains all 4 products No 'Submit for Review' pending changes Product attached to live app version 1.0.0 (8) Tax category: Match to parent app Family Sharing: Off (consistent with the working products) Paid Applications Agreement: Status: Active Banking and Tax forms: Active RevenueCat dashboard: All 4 products show Store Status: Approved Default offering contains all 4 packages iOS attachment for the affected product is intact No warnings or sync errors Sandbox StoreKit (today): flutter run (debug) on physical device → all 4 products returned flutter run --release on physical device → all 4 products returned Sandbox purchase of unlimited_monthly_1299 succeeds Production StoreKit (today, broken): App Store-downloaded 1.0.0 (8) on multiple users' devices Multiple Apple IDs / multiple devices / multiple regions — all reproduce Only unlimited_monthly_1299 affected; other 3 products fine Why this looks server-side Sudden simultaneous onset across all users No code or config change preceded onset Sandbox unaffected, only Production affected Single product affected, not the whole subscription group or app No error returned — silent omission only Cannot reproduce with locally signed builds, only with App Store-distributed binary This pattern is consistent with a server-side product indexing or fronting issue specific to one product in Production StoreKit. As a developer I don't have visibility into Apple's product-serving infrastructure to investigate further — looking for guidance from anyone who has seen this before. Questions for the community Has anyone else seen a single auto-renewable subscription silently drop out of Production StoreKit responses while remaining Approved in ASC, with no error code returned? Is there any internal product-state flag (beyond what's exposed in the ASC UI) that could cause Production StoreKit to silently omit a product? Anything similar to a hidden 'review hold' or 'price tier reconciliation' state? Has the asymmetry between RevenueCat package identifiers (Standard uses RC's $rc_monthly/$rc_annual default identifiers, Premium uses custom premium_monthly/premium_annual identifiers) ever been implicated in this kind of failure? RC support has been notified, but worth asking publicly. For anyone who has resolved a similar issue: what action ended up clearing it — ASC re-save, RC re-sync, Apple Support escalation, or did it self-resolve after Apple-side cache propagation? Filings in progress ASC Contact Us ticket: filed Apple DTS technical incident: filed RevenueCat support ticket: filed Feedback Assistant report: in progress Will update this thread with the resolution path once we have one. Thanks, — Kin Pong Lo (developer, Alice: AI English Tutor)
Replies
0
Boosts
0
Views
157
Activity
1w