Our application has initiated an NSURLSession data task, and we have received an initiation ID. However, Application not received callback on the subsequent activity: the task has not been requested, has not timed out, and no error callback has been received. [06/17 09:29:40:559][ 0x282a7d8c0] Requested TaskIdentifier 120 2025-06-17 09:29:40.623337 +0530 nsurlsessiond SUBMITTING: com.apple.CFNetwork-cc-166-373-Task .<120>:A71666 default 2025-06-17 09:29:40.631280 +0530 dasd Submitted Activity: com.apple.CFNetwork-cc-166-373-Task .<120>:A71666 at priority 10 default Seen couple of rejection with for CPUUsagePolicy and MemoryPressurePolicy 2025-06-17 09:29:40.989360 +0530 dasd com.apple.CFNetwork-cc-166-373-Task .<120>:A71666:[ {name: CPUUsagePolicy, policyWeight: 5.000, response: {Decision: Must Not Proceed, Score: 0.00, Rationale: [{[Max allowed CPU Usage level]: Required:90.00, Observed:95.00},]}} {name: MemoryPressurePolicy, policyWeight: 5.000, response: {Decision: Must Not Proceed, Score: 0.00, Rationale: [{[memoryPressure]: Required:1.00, Observed:2.00},]}} ], FinalDecision: Must Not Proceed} default 2025-06-17 10:55:22.500277 +0530 dasd com.apple.CFNetwork-cc-166-373-Task .<120>:A71666:[ {name: MemoryPressurePolicy, policyWeight: 5.000, response: {Decision: Must Not Proceed, Score: 0.00, Rationale: [{[memoryPressure]: Required:1.00, Observed:2.00},]}} ], FinalDecision: Must Not Proceed} default And more an hour later then it throws with an error BUT NEVER indicated the same to client 2025-06-17 10:55:27.426549 +0530 WAVE PTX Task .<120> is for <>.<>.<120> default 2025-06-17 10:55:27.776951 +0530 nsurlsessiond Task .<120> summary for task failure {transaction_duration_ms=5147145, response_status=-1, connection=0, reused=1, request_start_ms=0, request_duration_ms=0, response_start_ms=0, response_duration_ms=0, request_bytes=0, response_bytes=0, cache_hit=false} default 2025-06-17 10:55:27.777096 +0530 nsurlsessiond NDSession <714296D7-20F9-4A0A-8C31-71FB67F39A56> Task .<120> for client will be retried after error Error Domain=_nsurlsessiondErrorDomain Code=6 UserInfo={NSErrorFailingURLStringKey=, NSErrorFailingURLKey=, _NSURLErrorRelatedURLSessionTaskErrorKey=, _NSURLErrorFailingURLSessionTaskErrorKey=} - code: 6 default Then It got resumed and says successful but never got any callback on the same to client 2025-06-17 10:55:28.877245 +0530 nsurlsessiond NDSession <714296D7-20F9-4A0A-8C31-71FB67F39A56> Task .<120> resuming default 2025-06-17 10:55:55.225456 +0530 nsurlsessiond Task .<120> received response, status 401 content K default 2025-06-17 10:55:55.250371 +0530 nsurlsessiond Task .<120> finished successfully default Please refer feedback for diagnose logs: https://feedbackassistant.apple.com/feedback/18173303

When I try to implement the new Background Task options in the same way as they show in the WWDC video (on watchOS) likes this: let config = URLSessionConfiguration.background(withIdentifier: "SESSION_ID") config.sessionSendsLaunchEvents = true let session = URLSession(configuration: config) let response = await withTaskCancellationHandler {       try? await session.data(for: request) } onCancel: {       let task = session.downloadTask(with: request))       task.resume() } I'm receiving the following error: Terminating app due to uncaught exception 'NSGenericException', reason: 'Completion handler blocks are not supported in background sessions. Use a delegate instead.' Did I forget something?

I was excited about the new APIs added to Network.framework in iOS 26 that offer structure concurrency support out of the box and a more modern API design in general. However I have been unable to use them to create a device-to-device QUIC connection. The blocker I ran into is that NetworkListener's run method requires the network protocol to conform to OneToOneProtocol, whereas QUIC conforms to MultiplexProtocol. And there doesn't seem to be any way to accept an incoming MultiplexProtocol connection? Nor does it seem possible to turn a UDP connection into a QUIC connection using NetworkConnection.prependProtocols() as that also only works for network protocols conforming to OneToOneProtocol. I suspect this is an accidental omission in the API design (?), and already filed a Feedback (FB18620438). But maybe I am missing something and there is a workaround or a different way to listen for incoming QUIC connections using the new NetworkListener? QUIC.TLS has methods peerAuthenticationRequired(Bool) and peerAuthenticationOptional(Bool), which makes me think that peer to peer QUIC connections are intended to be supported? I would also love to see documentation for those methods. For example I wonder what exact effect peerAuthenticationRequired(false) and peerAuthenticationOptional(false) would have and how they differ.

Our product (rockhawk.ca) uses the Multipeer Connectivity framework for peer-to-peer communication between multiple iOS/iPadOS devices. My understanding is that MC framework communicates via three methods: 1) infrastructure wifi (i.e. multiple iOS/iPadOS devices are connected to the same wifi network), 2) peer-to-peer wifi, or 3) Bluetooth. In my experience, I don't believe I've seen MC use Bluetooth. With wifi turned off on the devices, and Bluetooth turned on, no connection is established. With wifi on and Bluetooth off, MC works and I presume either infrastructure wifi (if available) or peer-to-peer wifi are used. I'm trying to overcome two issues: Over time (since iOS 9.x), the radio transmit strength for MC over peer-to-peer wifi has decreased to the point that range is unacceptable for our use case. We need at least 150 feet range. We would like to extend this support to watchOS and the MC framework is not available. Regarding #1, I'd like to confirm that if infrastructure wifi is available, MC uses it. If infrastructure wifi is not available, MC uses peer-to-peer wifi. If this is true, then we can assure our customers that if infrastructure wifi is available at the venue, then with all devices connected to it, range will be adequate. If infrastructure wifi is not available at the venue, perhaps a mobile wifi router (battery operated) could be set up, devices connected to it, then range would be adequate. We are about to test this. Reasonable? Can we be assured that if infrastructure wifi is available, MC uses it? Regarding #2, given we are targeting minimum watchOS 7.0, would the available networking APIs and frameworks be adequate to implement our own equivalent of the MC framework so our app on iOS/iPadOS and watchOS devices could communicate? How much work? Where would I start? I'm new to implementing networking but experienced in using the MC framework. I'm assuming that I would write the networking code to use infrastructure wifi to achieve acceptable range. Many thanks! Tim

Hi, I am having a ton of issues with the new multicast/network entitlements requirements on MacOS. Basically, since my app didn't request these new entitlements until recently, if the app had been installed without these permissions enabled, it will not pick up the new permissions once they are enabled. The only options I had were to create a new user, and install the app under the new user, which works, but is not a real solution for users. This is really problematic, as there is no way currently to remove or change these network permissions once they are established. Is there a way to fix this? Or some other workarounds I am missing? Thanks Also via the documentation: TN3179: Understanding local network privacy | Apple Developer Documentation "There's no guarantee that it'll actually trigger the alert” And "On macOS there’s no way to reset your program’s Local Network privilege to the undetermined state (FB14944392). One alternative is to run your program in a virtual machine (VM). To retest, restore the VM from a snapshot taken before you installed your program.”

I filed FB19631435 about this just now. Basically: starting with 15.6, we've had reports (internally and outternally) that after some period of time, networking fails so badly that it can't even acquire a DHCP lease, and the system needs to be rebooted to fix this. The systems in question all have at least 2 VPN applications installed; ours is a transparent proxy provider, and the affected system also had Crowdstrike's Falcon installed. A customer system reported seemingly identical failures on their systems; they don't have Crowdstrike, but they do have Cyberhaven's. Has anyone else seen somethng like this? Since it seems to involve three different networking extensions, I'm assuming it's due to an interaction between them, not a bug in any individual one. But what do I know? 😄

I want to configure one aspect of my networking configuration (the QUIC keepalive interval). This only seems to be configurable via Network.framework’s nw_quic_set_keepalive_interval. Is there any way to apply this to a URLSession? Or do I need to implement the whole connection management myself using Network.framework?

There is no available API that allows you to connect to Android. The current APIs that are provided are not compatible outside of the Apple Ecosystem. For example, Android requires you to set a service name and a password where iOS sets a service and a PIN authentication strategy in a specific format that’s not compatible. It looks like the implementation is not following the Wifi Aware Specifications. To enable cross platform interoperability while providing security, could you adopt the same strategy as with Bluetooth and enable iOS users to enable the sharing and subscription of services with Everyone.

iOS Development environment Xcode 16.4, macOS 15.6.1 (24G90) Run-time configuration: iOS 17.2+ Short Description After having successfully established an NWConnection (either as UDP or TCP), and subsequently receiving the error code: UDP Connection failed: 57 The operation couldn't be completed. (Network.NWError error 57 - Socket is not connected), available Interfaces: [enO] via NWConnection.stateUpdateHandler = { (newState) in ... } while newState == .failed the data connection does not restart by itself once cellular (RF) telephony coverage is established again. Detailed Description Context: my app has a continuous cellular data connection while in use. Either a UDP or a TCP connection is established depending on the user settings. The setup data connection works fine until the data connection gets disconnected by loss of connection to a available cellular phone base station. This disconnection simply occurs in very poor UMTS or GSM cellular phone coverage. This is totally normal behavior in bad reception areas like in mountains with signal loss. STEPS TO REPRODUCE Pre-condition App is running with active data connection. Action iPhone does loss the cellular data connection previously setup. Typically reported as network error code 57. Observed The programmed connection.stateUpdateHandler() is called in network connection state '.failed' (OK). The self-programmed data re-connection includes: a call to self.connection.cancel() a call to self.setupUDPConnection() or self.setupConnection() depending on the user settings to re-establish an operative data connection. However, the iPhone's UMTS/GSM network data (re-)connection state is not properly identified/notified via NWConnection API. There's no further network state notification by means of NWConnection even though the iPhone has recovered a cellular data network. Expected The iPhone or any other means automatically reconnects the interrupted data connection on its own. The connection.stateUpdateHandler() is called at time of the device's networking data connection (RF) recovering, subsequently to a connection state failed with error code 57, as the RF module is continuously (independently from the app) for available telephony networks. QUESTION How to systematically/properly detect a cellular phone data network reconnection readiness in order to causally reinitialize the NWConnection data connection available used in app. Relevant code extract Setup UDP connection (or similarly setup a TCP connection) func setupUDPConnection() { let udp = NWProtocolUDP.Options.init() udp.preferNoChecksum = false let params = NWParameters.init(dtls: nil, udp: udp) params.serviceClass = .responsiveData // service type for medium-delay tolerant, elastic and inelastic flow, bursty, and long-lived connections connection = NWConnection(host: NWEndpoint.Host.name(AppConstant.Web.urlWebSafeSky, nil), port: NWEndpoint.Port(rawValue: AppConstant.Web.urlWebSafeSkyPort)!, using: params) connection.stateUpdateHandler = { (newState) in switch (newState) { case .ready: //print("UDP Socket State: Ready") self.receiveUDPConnection(). // data reception works fine until network loss break case .setup: //print("UDP Socket State: Setup") break case .cancelled: //print("UDP Socket State: Cancelled") break case .preparing: //print("UDP Socket State: Preparing") break case .waiting(let error): Logger.logMessage(message: "UDP Connection waiting: "+error.errorCode.description+" \(error.localizedDescription), available Interfaces: \(self.connection.currentPath!.availableInterfaces.description)", LoggerLevels.Error) break case .failed(let error): Logger.logMessage(message: "UDP Connection failed: "+error.errorCode.description+" \(error.localizedDescription), available Interfaces: \(self.connection.currentPath!.availableInterfaces.description)", LoggerLevels.Error) // data connection retry (expecting network transport layer to be available) self.reConnectionServer() break default: //print("UDP Socket State: Waiting or Failed") break } self.handleStateChange() } connection.start(queue: queue) } Handling of network data connection loss private func reConnectionServer() { self.connection.cancel() // Re Init Connection - Give a little time to network recovery let delayInSec = 30.0. // expecting actually a notification for network data connection availability, instead of a time-triggered retry self.queue.asyncAfter(deadline: .now() + delayInSec) { switch NetworkConnectionType { case 1: self.setupUDPConnection() // UDP break case 2: self.setupConnection() // TCP break default: break } } } Does it necessarily require the use of CoreTelephony class CTTelephonyNetworkInfo or class CTCellularData to get notifications of changes to the user’s cellular service provider?

My laptop (M1 Pro, macOS 15.3.2) is connected to a dual stack network via Wi-Fi. The home.arpa. domain is supplied as a search domain via both DHCPv4 (options 15 and 119) and DHCPv6 (option 24). "Details…" for the network connection in System Settings show this domain under the DNS tab. The laptop uses a Forwarding DNS Resolver of my router, which in turn forwards requests for home.arpa. (including subdomains) to a local DNS server (CoreDNS) which is authoritative for this zone. The DNS server is configured via the following zone file: $ORIGIN home.arpa. $TTL 3600 @ IN SOA @ nobody.invalid. (1 3600 1200 604800 3600) @ NS @ @ AAAA ….1 gateway A ….1 gateway AAAA …::1 b._dns-sd._udp PTR @ lb._dns-sd._udp PTR @ db._dns-sd._udp PTR @ _services._dns-sd._udp PTR _smb._tcp _smb._tcp PTR Media._smb._tcp Media._smb._tcp SRV 0 0 445 gateway Media._smb._tcp TXT ("path=/media" "u=guest") Output of dig(1) looks like: $ dig @….1 -t PTR lb._dns-sd._udp.home.arpa. ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 43291 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;lb._dns-sd._udp.home.arpa. IN PTR ;; ANSWER SECTION: lb._dns-sd._udp.home.arpa. 1993 IN PTR home.arpa. ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: home.arpa. 2771 IN NS home.arpa. $ dig @….1 -t PTR _services._dns-sd._udp.home.arpa. ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 9057 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;_services._dns-sd._udp.home.arpa. IN PTR ;; ANSWER SECTION: _services._dns-sd._udp.home.arpa. 3600 IN PTR _smb._tcp.home.arpa. ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: home.arpa. 3600 IN NS home.arpa. $ dig @….1 -t PTR _smb._tcp.home.arpa. ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 44220 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;_smb._tcp.home.arpa. IN PTR ;; ANSWER SECTION: _smb._tcp.home.arpa. 3599 IN PTR Media._smb._tcp.home.arpa. ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: home.arpa. 3599 IN NS home.arpa. $ dig @….1 -t SRV Media._smb._tcp.home.arpa. ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 45878 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;Media._smb._tcp.home.arpa. IN SRV ;; ANSWER SECTION: media._smb._tcp.home.arpa. 3600 IN SRV 0 0 445 gateway.home.arpa. ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: home.arpa. 3600 IN NS home.arpa. $ dig @….1 -t A gateway.home.arpa. ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 2782 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;gateway.home.arpa. IN A ;; ANSWER SECTION: gateway.home.arpa. 86400 IN A 192.168.99.1 ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: home.arpa. 3578 IN NS home.arpa. $ dig @….1 -t AAAA gateway.home.arpa. ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 17297 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;gateway.home.arpa. IN AAAA ;; ANSWER SECTION: gateway.home.arpa. 3600 IN AAAA fd6f:9784:5753::1 ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: home.arpa. 3600 IN NS home.arpa. Output of dns-sd(1): /usr/bin/dns-sd -test … Testing for error returns when various strings are > 63 bytes: PASSED Running basic API input range tests with various pointer parameters set to NULL: Basic API input range tests: PASSED $ dns-sd -m -F Looking for recommended browsing domains: DATE: ---Fri 11 Apr 2025--- 8:50:17.846 ...STARTING... Timestamp Recommended Browsing domain 8:50:17.847 Added (More) local 8:50:17.847 Added arpa - > home $ dns-sd -B _smb._tcp home.arpa. Browsing for _smb._tcp.home.arpa. DATE: ---Fri 11 Apr 2025--- 8:59:10.044 ...STARTING... $ dns-sd -L Media _smb._tcp home.arpa. Lookup Media._smb._tcp.home.arpa. DATE: ---Fri 11 Apr 2025--- 9:15:53.328 ...STARTING... $ dns-sd -Q _smb._tcp.home.arpa. PTR IN DATE: ---Fri 11 Apr 2025--- 9:16:52.208 ...STARTING... Timestamp A/R Flags IF Name Type Class Rdata 9:16:52.210 Add 40000002 0 _smb._tcp.home.arpa. PTR IN 0.0.0.0 No Such Record 9:16:52.222 Add 2 0 _smb._tcp.home.arpa. PTR IN 0.0.0.0 No Such Record Similarly, when I open Finder->Network I see home.arpa but it's empty. Of interest is that on the DNS server side I see the following requests being made: 2025-04-11 09:03:15 container,info,debug [INFO] […]:56541 - 21555 "SOA IN _afpovertcp._tcp.home.arpa. udp 44 false 512" NXDOMAIN qr,aa,rd 112 0.000755089s 2025-04-11 09:03:15 container,info,debug [INFO] […]:56077 - 58266 "SOA IN _smb._tcp.home.arpa. udp 37 false 512" NOERROR qr,aa,rd 105 0.001012632s 2025-04-11 09:03:15 container,info,debug [INFO] […]:45274 - 45976 "SOA IN _rfb._tcp.home.arpa. udp 37 false 512" NXDOMAIN qr,aa,rd 105 0.000762339s 2025-04-11 09:03:15 container,info,debug [INFO] […]:54387 - 32090 "SOA IN _adisk._tcp.home.arpa. udp 39 false 512" NXDOMAIN qr,aa,rd 107 0.001058132s 2025-04-11 09:03:15 container,info,debug [INFO] […]:35855 - 51155 "SOA IN _tcp.home.arpa. udp 32 false 512" NOERROR qr,aa,rd 100 0.000664963s I suppose that an attempt to locate services is made but it's unsuccessful and I'm not sure why. What further debugging can I attempt?

With my UDP Flow Copier working as demonstrated by the fact that it is proxying DNS traffic successfully, I am finally writing tests to verify UDP packet filtering. I'm sending packets to a public UDP echo server and reading the response successfully. In my initial testing however the TransparentProxyProvider System Extension is not intercepting my UDP traffic. handleNewUDPFlow() is being called for DNS but not for my test case UDP echo sends and receives. I've tried sending UDP with both GCDAsyncSocket and NWConnection as: connection = NWConnection(host: host, port: port, using: .udp) Is there some other criteria for UDP datagrams to be intercepted? Google search suggests this might be a known issue for connected or async UDP sockets.

we use the api as NEHotspotConfigurationManager.shared.apply(hotspotConfig) to join a wifi, but we find that in in iphone 17+, some user report the time to join wifi is very slow the full code as let hotspotConfig = NEHotspotConfiguration(ssid: sSSID, passphrase: sPassword, isWEP: false) hotspotConfig.joinOnce = bJoinOnce if #available(iOS 13.0, *) { hotspotConfig.hidden = true } NEHotspotConfigurationManager.shared.apply(hotspotConfig) { [weak self] (error) in guard let self else { return } if let error = error { log.i("connectSSID Error while configuring WiFi: \(error.localizedDescription)") if error.localizedDescription.contains("already associated") { log.i("connectSSID Already connected to this WiFi.") result(["status": 0]) } else { result(["status": 0]) } } else { log.i("connectSSID Successfully connected to WiFi network \(sSSID)") result(["status": 1]) } } Normally it might only take 5-10 seconds, but on the iPhone 17+ it might take 20-30 seconds.

(iOS 17.3) I'm using the Apple supplied iOS sample project "ConfiguringAWiFiAccessoryToJoinTheUsersNetwork" as a base to write an App to configure an existing WiFi device using the NEHotspotConfiguration API's. I have almost everything working, and can join the network and send a packet to the device to configure it. I know that it is working as the device responds properly to what I send it. But I am not able to receive the response back from the device to the packet sent. (Only need 1 packet sent and 1 packet received) However. If I run a packet sniffer on the phone before running my test App, then I do get a response. No packet sniffer running, no response. When I do a debugDescription on the NWConnection after it reaches ".ready", I notice that when the sniffer is running I'm using loopback lo0: [C1 connected 192.168.4.1:80 tcp, url: http://192.168.4.1:80, attribution: developer, path satisfied (Path is satisfied), viable, interface: lo0] and I get a packet response in the NWConnection receiveMessage callback. But with no sniffer running, I get interface en0: [C1 connected 192.168.4.1:80 tcp, url: http://192.168.4.1:80, attribution: developer, path satisfied (Path is satisfied), viable, interface: en0[802.11], ipv4, dns, uses wifi] and there is no callback to the receiveMessage handler and the NWconnection eventually times out. The interface used seems to be the only difference that I can see when I have a sniffer running. Any ideas as to why I can't see a response in "normal" operation?

Hello, Recently I am trying to add stub dns server to my Network Extension (a VPN app), after some research on this forum, and since my language is C, I have the following plan: create a udp socket which use setsockopt(IP_BOUND_IF) to bound the socket to the utun if index obtained, and also bind to the address of the utun address I set(let's say 192.168.99.2), then listen on the udp port 53 which is ready to handle dns request. configure the dns server to 192.168.99.2 in the provider's Network Settings, thus iOS system will send udp query to the udp socket created in step 1, and it can then do some split dns function such as resolve using local interface (cellular or wifi), or some nameserve which will be routed to the VPN tunnel (will create new UDP socket and do IP_BOUND_IF to ensure the traffic will enter the VPN tunnel), and the result should be return to the system and then the non VPP apps. But I observer weird issue, indeed I can get the system send the dns request to the listening udp socket and I can get the result write to the system(address like 192.168.99.2:56144, the port should be allocated by the iOS system's DNS component) without any failure(I did get some error before due to I using the wrong utun if index, but fixed it later), but it seems non VPN app like browser can't get the resolved ip for domains. I want to ask is this limited by the sandbox? or any special sock opt I need to do. Thanks. PS: in the provider's network settings, all the system's traffic will be point to the utun, which means the VPN process will process all the traffic. the reason I do not set the dns server to utun peers side which is my userspace networking stack's ip (192.168.99.1) is the stack is not be able to leverage some dns libraries due to architecture issue. (it's fd.io vpp which we ported to apple platform).

For years our iOS apps have experienced a networking problem, which blocks them connecting to our servers via their API endpoint domains. How can we recover after the scenario described below? Using 3rd party error logging solutions, which have different endpoint domains, we can record the error: NSUnderlyingError": Error Domain=kCFErrorDomainCFNetwork Code=-1200 "(null)" UserInfo={_kCFStreamPropertySSLClientCertificateState=0, _kCFNetworkCFStreamSSLErrorOriginalValue=-9816, _kCFStreamErrorDomainKey=3, _kCFStreamErrorCodeKey=-9816, _NSURLErrorNWPathKey=satisfied (Path is satisfied), viable, interface: pdp_ip0[lte], ipv4, dns, expensive, uses cell}, "_NSURLErrorFailingURLSessionTaskErrorKey": LocalDataTask <DEDBFA4D-810D-4438-A6A0-95E3B9668B9E>.<308>, "_kCFStreamErrorDomainKey": 3, "_NSURLErrorRelatedURLSessionTaskErrorKey": <__NSSingleObjectArrayI 0x301f82e60>( LocalDataTask <DEDBFA4D-810D-4438-A6A0-95E3B9668B9E>.<308> ) "NSLocalizedDescription": An SSL error has occurred and a secure connection to the server cannot be made., "NSLocalizedRecoverySuggestion": Would you like to connect to the server anyway? -9816 is the "server closed session with no notification" error based on comments in CoreFoundation source files. Subsequent API endpoint calls to the same domain return the same error. The SSL error occurs most prevalently after a server outage. However, despite our best efforts, we have been unable to replicate triggering the problem for development purposes via experiments with our server. When the error occurs the users report that: Fully closing (i.e. not just sending to background) and reopening the app does NOT clear connectivity to our server being blocked. Problem seems more prevalent when using mobile/cell data. Switching from mobile/cell data to WIFI resolves the connection problem and then switching back to mobile/cell data shows the problem again. So the underlying problem is not cleared. All other apps on the same device and mobile/cell data or WIFI connection, like Safari, have no problems connecting to the Internet. Deleting and reinstalling, or updating (when an update is available) resolves the problem. Or after waiting a few days the problem seems to resolve itself. The last two point above suggest that something is persisted/cached in the app preventing it from connecting properly with subsequent network attempts. Notes: We have one shared instance of the URLSession in the app for its networking because we are aware of the perils of multiple URLSession instances. We recently added conditions to call the URLSession await reset() method when detecting the SLL errors before repeating the request. It is debatable whether this reduces the problem as we still see logged cases with the subsequent requests hitting the same -9816 error. URLSession configuration: let config = URLSessionConfiguration.default config.timeoutIntervalForResource = 22 config.timeoutIntervalForRequest = 20 config.requestCachePolicy = .reloadIgnoringLocalCacheData config.urlCache = nil

I'm trying to use ThreadNetwork API to manage TheradNetworks on device (following this documentation: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/threadnetwork/), but while some functions on THClient work (such as getPreferedNetwork), most don't (storeCredentials, retrieveAllCredentials). When calling these functions I get the following warning/error: Client: -[THClient getConnectionEntitlementValidity]_block_invoke - Error: -[THClient storeCredentialsForBorderAgent:activeOperationalDataSet:completion:]_block_invoke:701: - Error: Error Domain=NSCocoaErrorDomain Code=4099 "The connection to service with pid 414 named com.apple.ThreadNetwork.xpc was invalidated from this process." UserInfo={NSDebugDescription=The connection to service with pid 414 named com.apple.ThreadNetwork.xpc was invalidated from this process.} Error Domain=NSCocoaErrorDomain Code=4099 "The connection to service with pid 414 named com.apple.ThreadNetwork.xpc was invalidated from this process." UserInfo={NSDebugDescription=The connection to service with pid 414 named com.apple.ThreadNetwork.xpc was invalidated from this process.} Failed to store Thread credentials: Couldn’t communicate with a helper application. STEPS TO REPRODUCE Create new project Add Thread Network capability via Xcode UI (com.apple.developer.networking.manage-thread-network-credentials) Trigger storeCredentials let extendedMacData = "9483C451DC3E".hexadecimal let tlvHex = "0e080000000000010000000300001035060004001fffe002083c66f0dc9ef53f1c0708fdb360c72874da9905104094dce45388fd3d3426e992cbf0697b030d474c2d5332302d6e65773030310102250b04106c9f919a4da9b213764fc83f849381080c0402a0f7f8".hexadecimal // Initialize the THClient let thClient = THClient() // Store the credentials await thClient.storeCredentials(forBorderAgent: extendedMacData!, activeOperationalDataSet: tlvHex!) { error in if let error = error { print(error) print("Failed to store Thread credentials: \(error.localizedDescription)") } else { print("Successfully stored Thread credentials") } } NOTES: I tried with first calling getPreferedNetwork to initiate network permission dialog Tried adding meshcop to bojur services Tried with different release and debug build configurations

Hello. I'm developing on a cross-platform app to help user connect enterprise network and found it difficult in macOS. The issue is, I guided user to install profile, but the authentication won't start immediately even the cable is plugged in or the WLAN is connected. There is still some manual operation to be done: Ethernet: Select the correct profile, and click the Connect button. Wlan: Click the Connect button. (The profile contains SSID so need't select the correct profile) Obviously, the operation is still not easy for users to understand and follow. So, is there any method to auto connect 802.1x network using the selected profile in terminal or by code? I mean, the manual operation is not necessary, maybe you can tell me a better solution. BTW, I found it possible to connect WLAN and auto select the correct profile by using this command networksetup -setairportnetwork en1 MY_SSID, but it could be very slow since the authentication seemed start 30 sec after connecting the SSID. So I believe it not the best solution.

We use as content filter in our app to monitor flows, we gather data about the flow and block flows deemed suspicious. Our content filter is activated/deactivated by a UI app but the flows are reported via XPC to a separate daemon process for analysis. As of macOS 15, we are seeing cases where flows are missing or flows are not received at all by the content filter. The behaviour is not consistent, some devices seem to receive flows normally but others don't. It appears Intel devices are much less prone to showing the problem, whereas Arm devices routinely exhibit missing flows. On macOS 14 or earlier, there is no sign of missing flows. Testing on earlier beta versions of macOS 15 did not appear to show the problem, however I can't rule out if issue was present but it wasn't spotted. Experimenting with simple examples of using a content filter (e.g. QNE2FilterMac) does not appear to reproduce the issue. Questions, What has changed between macOS 14 and 15 that could be the cause of the lack of flows? Is our approach to using an app activated content filter reporting to a daemon connected via XPC unsupported?

When the machine connects to the network cable through the Thunderbolt interface using the docking station, if the Network Extension shown in the following code is running at this time, after unplugging and reinserting the docking station, the machine will not be able to obtain a valid IP address through DHCP until the system is restarted. @interface MyTransparentProxyProvider : NETransparentProxyProvider @end @implementation MyTransparentProxyProvider - (void)startProxyWithOptions:(NSDictionary *)options completionHandler:(void (^)(NSError *))completionHandler { NETransparentProxyNetworkSettings *objSettings = [[NETransparentProxyNetworkSettings alloc] initWithTunnelRemoteAddress:@"127.0.0.1"]; // included rules NENetworkRule *objIncludedNetworkRule = [[NENetworkRule alloc] initWithRemoteNetwork:nil remotePrefix:0 localNetwork:nil localPrefix:0 protocol:NENetworkRuleProtocolAny direction:NETrafficDirectionOutbound]; NSMutableArray<NENetworkRule *> *arrIncludedNetworkRules = [NSMutableArray array]; [arrIncludedNetworkRules addObject:objIncludedNetworkRule]; objSettings.includedNetworkRules = arrIncludedNetworkRules; // apply [self setTunnelNetworkSettings:objSettings completionHandler: ^(NSError * _Nullable error) { // TODO } ]; if (completionHandler != nil) completionHandler(nil); } - (BOOL)handleNewFlow:(NEAppProxyFlow *)flow { return NO; } @end This problem will not occur if the IP of the DNS server or all UDP ports 53 are excluded in the Network Extension. @interface MyTransparentProxyProvider : NETransparentProxyProvider @end @implementation MyTransparentProxyProvider - (void)startProxyWithOptions:(NSDictionary *)options completionHandler:(void (^)(NSError *))completionHandler { NETransparentProxyNetworkSettings *objSettings = [[NETransparentProxyNetworkSettings alloc] initWithTunnelRemoteAddress:@"127.0.0.1"]; // included rules NENetworkRule *objIncludedNetworkRule = [[NENetworkRule alloc] initWithRemoteNetwork:nil remotePrefix:0 localNetwork:nil localPrefix:0 protocol:NENetworkRuleProtocolAny direction:NETrafficDirectionOutbound]; NSMutableArray<NENetworkRule *> *arrIncludedNetworkRules = [NSMutableArray array]; [arrIncludedNetworkRules addObject:objIncludedNetworkRule]; // excluded rules NENetworkRule *objExcludedNetworkRule = [[NENetworkRule alloc] initWithRemoteNetwork:[NWHostEndpoint endpointWithHostname:@"" port:@(53).stringValue] remotePrefix:0 localNetwork:nil localPrefix:0 protocol:NENetworkRuleProtocolUDP direction:NETrafficDirectionOutbound]; NSMutableArray<NENetworkRule *> *arrExcludedNetworkRules = [NSMutableArray array]; [arrExcludedNetworkRules addObject:objExcludedNetworkRule]; objSettings.includedNetworkRules = arrIncludedNetworkRules; objSettings.excludedNetworkRules = arrExcludedNetworkRules; // apply [self setTunnelNetworkSettings:objSettings completionHandler: ^(NSError * _Nullable error) { // TODO } ]; if (completionHandler != nil) completionHandler(nil); } - (BOOL)handleNewFlow:(NEAppProxyFlow *)flow { return NO; } @end Is MyTransparentProxyProvider in what place do wrong? To handle the connection on port 53, it is necessary to add the implementation of NEDNSProxyProvider? In -[MyTransparentProxyProvider handleNewFlow:] how to reverse DNS? getnameinfo() doesn't work, it returns EAI_NONAME.

Hi everyone, I’m encountering what appears to be a system-level issue with NEAppPushProvider extensions being unable to communicate with other devices on the local network, even when the main app has already been granted Local Network permission by the user. Context The following problem occurs in an iPad app running iOS 18.5. The main app successfully requests and is granted Local Network access via NSLocalNetworkUsageDescription in its Info.plist configuration. It can connect to a WebSocket server hosted on the local network without any issues, resolving its address by name. The extension (NEAppPushProvider) uses the same networking code as the app, extended via target membership of a controller class. It attempts to connect to the same hostname and port but consistently fails to establish a connection. The system log shows it properly resolving DNS but being stopped due to "local network prohibited". An extract of the logs from the Unified Logging System: 12:34:10.086064+0200 PushProvider [C526 Hostname#fd7b1452:8443 initial parent-flow ((null))] event: path:start @0.000s 12:34:10.087363+0200 PushProvider [C526 Hostname#fd7b1452:8443 waiting parent-flow (satisfied (Path is satisfied), interface: en0[802.11], ipv4, dns, uses wifi)] event: path:satisfied @0.005s 12:34:10.090074+0200 PushProvider [C526 Hostname#fd7b1452:8443 in_progress parent-flow (satisfied (Path is satisfied), interface: en0[802.11], ipv4, dns, uses wifi)] event: flow:start_connect @0.006s 12:34:10.093190+0200 PushProvider [C526.1 Hostname#fd7b1452:8443 in_progress resolver (satisfied (Path is satisfied), interface: en0[802.11], ipv4, dns, uses wifi)] event: resolver:start_dns @0.009s 12:34:10.094403+0200 PushProvider [C526.1.1 IPv4#f261a0dc:8443 waiting path (unsatisfied (Local network prohibited), interface: en0[802.11], ipv4, uses wifi)] event: path:unsatisfied @0.010s 12:34:10.098370+0200 PushProvider [C526.1.1.1 IPv4#f261a0dc:8443 failed path (unsatisfied (Local network prohibited), interface: en0[802.11], ipv4, uses wifi)] event: null:null @0.014s 12:34:10.098716+0200 PushProvider [C526.1 Hostname#fd7b1452:8443 failed resolver (satisfied (Path is satisfied), interface: en0[802.11], ipv4, dns, uses wifi)] event: resolver:children_failed @0.015s 12:34:10.099297+0200 PushProvider [C526 Hostname#fd7b1452:8443 waiting parent-flow (satisfied (Path is satisfied), interface: en0[802.11], ipv4, dns, uses wifi)] event: flow:child_failed @0.016s What I’ve Confirmed: The extension works perfectly if the DNS is changed to resolve the name to a public IP instead of a local one. The extension always connects by hostname. Devices on the local network can resolve each other’s IP addresses correctly and respond to pings. What I’ve Tried Adding NSLocalNetworkUsageDescription to the main app’s Info.plist, as recommended. Clean building the project again. Removing and reinstalling the app to ensure permission prompts are triggered fresh. Restarting the iPad. Ensuring main app cannot access the local network until the permission is granted. Ensuring the main app has connected to the same hostname and port before the extension attempts a connection Toggling the permission manually in Settings. Apple’s documentation states (TN3179): “In general, app extensions share the Local Network privilege state of their container app.” It also notes that some background-running extension types may be denied access if the privilege is undetermined. But in my case, the main app clearly has Local Network access, and the extension never receives it, even after repeated successful connections by the main app. Question Is this a known limitation with NEAppPushProvider? Is there a recommended way to ensure the extension is able to use the local network permission once the user has granted it on the app? Any feedback, suggestions, or confirmation would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.